WebProNews

Tag: Sundar Pichai

  • Google Cloud Is Growing…But So Are Its Losses

    Google Cloud Is Growing…But So Are Its Losses

    Google released income numbers for its cloud division for the first time, and the results are a mixed bag.

    Google reported $13.1 billion in revenue for 2020, an increase from $8.9 billion in 2019. Losses increased as well, however, hitting $5.6 billion. In contrast, losses in 2019 were $4.6 billion and $4.3 billion in 2018.

    While Google Cloud lost billions, it’s worth pointing out that its revenue growth outpaced its losses.

    “Our strong results this quarter reflect the helpfulness of our products and services to people and businesses, as well as the accelerating transition to online services and the cloud,” said CEO Sundar Pichai. “Google succeeds when we help our customers and partners succeed, and we see significant opportunities to forge meaningful partnerships as businesses increasingly look to a digital future.”

    “Our strong fourth quarter performance, with revenues of $56.9 billion, was driven by Search and YouTube, as consumer and business activity recovered from earlier in the year,” said Ruth Porat, CFO of Google and Alphabet. “Google Cloud revenues were $13.1 billion for 2020, with significant ongoing momentum, and we remain focused on delivering value across the growth opportunities we see.”

  • Ford Partners With Google For Cloud, Data, AI and Machine Learning

    Ford Partners With Google For Cloud, Data, AI and Machine Learning

    Ford has named Google its preferred partner in its connected vehicle efforts, also naming Google Cloud as its preferred cloud platform.

    Like virtually every other traditional automaker, Ford is under increased pressure to focus on the next generation of data-driven, connected vehicles — an area where Tesla is seen as having a commanding lead. As a result, many automakers are turning to the world’s leading cloud platforms to help them make the transformation.

    Ford and Google are forming a new collaborate group, Team Upshift, “that will push the boundaries of Ford’s transformation, unlock personalized consumer experiences, and drive disruptive, data-driven opportunities.”

    As part of the partnership, Ford will rely on Google Cloud, and Google’s expertise in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and data. Millions of Ford and Lincoln vehicles across all price points will provide an Android-powered digital experience, along with Google apps and services. Google Assistant, Google Maps and Google Play will all be available, with Android making it possible for developers to build additional apps.

    “As Ford continues the most profound transformation in our history with electrification, connectivity and self-driving, Google and Ford coming together establishes an innovation powerhouse truly able to deliver a superior experience for our customers and modernize our business,” said Jim Farley, President and CEO of Ford.

    “From the first moving assembly line to the latest driver-assist technology, Ford has set the pace of innovation for the automotive industry for nearly 120 years,” said Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet. “We’re proud to partner to apply the best of Google’s AI, data analytics, compute and cloud platforms to help transform Ford’s business and build automotive technologies that keep people safe and connected on the road.”

  • Google Moving Against Second AI Ethics Researcher

    Google Moving Against Second AI Ethics Researcher

    Still mired in controversy over its firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru, Google appears to be repeating history with Margaret Mitchell, its Ethics AI lead.

    Google drew widespread condemnation from critics inside and outside the company for its firing of Dr. Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers. Gebru was forced out following the publication of a paper critical of some of the AI technology Google uses in its products. Google says Gebru resigned, but both Gebru and her team say she was fired after demands she retract the paper.

    The incident prompted CEO Sundar Pichai to send an email to employees, apologizing for what happened and promising the company would do better in the future.

    It would appear that promise may be short-lived, as Google is now taking action against Mitchell. Gebru tweeted the news on Tuesday.

    VentureBeat reached out to Google and received the following statement:

    Our security systems automatically lock an employee’s corporate account when they detect that the account is at risk of compromise due to credential problems or when an automated rule involving the handling of sensitive data has been triggered. In this instance, yesterday our systems detected that an account had exfiltrated thousands of files and shared them with multiple external accounts. We explained this to the employee earlier today. We are actively investigating this matter as part of standard procedures to gather additional details.

    Mitchell has been a vocal critic of Google’s handling of Gebru’s termination, tweeting the following just five hours before Gebru tweeted about the action taken against her:

    One big point of contention is the integrity of the research performed by Google’s scientists and researchers. In an email to Google’s leadership, the company’s AI researchers emphasized what’s at stake:

    Google’s short-sighted decision to fire and retaliate against a core member of the Ethical AI team makes it clear that we need swift and structural changes if this work is to continue, and if the legitimacy of the field as a whole is to persevere.

    This research must be able to contest the company’s short-term interests and immediate revenue agendas, as well as to investigate AI that is deployed by Google’s competitors with similar ethical motives.

    Unfortunately, those concerns seem to have fallen on deaf ears. That letter was sent in mid-December. In late December, however, Google told researchers to “take great care to strike a positive tone” on “sensitive topics,” such as as AI, according to an email obtained by Reuters.

    With Margaret Mitchell, the company’s Ethical AI lead, now potentially on the chopping block, Google is on the verge of losing all credibility among AI researchers.

  • Alphabet and Google Employees Form Union

    Alphabet and Google Employees Form Union

    Alphabet and Google employees have formed a union in response to missteps by management.

    The Alphabet Workers Union (AWU) has been formed with support from the Communications Workers of America (CWA). The union is the first in the company’s history, and one of just a few in the tech industry at large.

    Support for unionization has been growing within Alphabet/Google for some time, and management’s actions have only increased that support. In late 2020, the company was accused of illegally spying on, and eventually firing, employees who were trying to form a union, leading to a complaint by the National Labor Relations Board.

    Google also landed in hot water for firing Dr. Timnit Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers. While the company maintains Dr. Gebru resigned, her colleagues insist the company forced her out. The move drew condemnation from experts inside and outside the company. While CEO Sundar Pichai tried to address the issue in an email to employees, it was widely criticized as being tone-deaf.

    Dr. Gebru’s firing was directly referenced in a statement announcing the formation of the AWU:

    Most recently, the company fired Dr. Timnit Gebru, a leading artificial intelligence researcher, for no reason whatsoever. The firing has caused outrage from thousands of us, including Black and Brown workers who are heartbroken by the company’s actions and unsure of their future at Google.

    The statement also addressed the company’s “Don’t Be Evil” slogan. Once a motto the company proudly displayed and adhered to, it has increasingly become an afterthought, as the company has worked with China, accepted military contracts, mishandled sexual abuse allegations, intimidated workers and more, issues that have further alienated workers:

    Workers who have organized to stop these trends have been met by intimidation, suppression, and blatantly illegal firings, as recently confirmed by the National Labor Relations Board. Instead of listening to workers, Google hired IRI, a notorious anti-union firm, to suppress their organizing. This is how Google’s executives have chosen to interact with workers.

    The only tactic that has ensured workers are respected and heard is collective action. Project Maven was cancelled when thousands of Googlers pledged they would not work on unethical tech. Forced arbitration was ended when Googlers walked out across the globe.

    Employees made it clear the AWU would work to address these issues, and use their collective power to force Google’s hand into making better decisions.

    “This union builds upon years of courageous organizing by Google workers,” said Nicki Anselmo, Program Manager. “From fighting the ‘real names’ policy, to opposing Project Maven, to protesting the egregious, multi-million dollar payouts that have been given to executives who’ve committed sexual harassment, we’ve seen first-hand that Alphabet responds when we act collectively. Our new union provides a sustainable structure to ensure that our shared values as Alphabet employees are respected even after the headlines fade.”

    “This is historic—the first union at a major tech company by and for all tech workers,” said Dylan Baker, Software Engineer. “We will elect representatives, we will make decisions democratically, we will pay dues, and we will hire skilled organizers to ensure all workers at Google know they can work with us if they actually want to see their company reflect their values.”

    It remains to be seen how Alphabet/Google will respond, but management has an opportunity to reset relations with employees and regain some of the respect it has squandered.

  • Google AI Researchers Cite Demands, Want Academic Integrity

    Google AI Researchers Cite Demands, Want Academic Integrity

    Google is experiencing more fallout from its handling of Dr. Timnit Gebru’s dismissal, with the company’s AI researchers making demands.

    The company was cast in the spotlight when news broke that Dr. Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers had left the company. Google claimed Gebru had resigned, but she and her coworkers say she was fired.

    Much of the issue stemmed from Gebru and her fellow researchers authoring a paper that raised concerns about the kind of AI Google uses in a number of projects. The controversy led CEO Sundar Pichai to apologize for how the situation was handled, although even the apology drew criticism for being tone-deaf, both from those inside and outside the company.

    AI researchers within the company are now demanding changes, according to an email seen by Bloomberg. One such demand is that a company vice president, Megan Kacholia, be removed from the reporting chain. The researches said they had “lost trust in her as a leader.”

    The researches also demanded the freedom to pursue research, even if it conflicted with Google’s short-term interests.

    “Google’s short-sighted decision to fire and retaliate against a core member of the Ethical AI team makes it clear that we need swift and structural changes if this work is to continue, and if the legitimacy of the field as a whole is to persevere,” the letter reads.

    “This research must be able to contest the company’s short-term interests and immediate revenue agendas, as well as to investigate AI that is deployed by Google’s competitors with similar ethical motives,” the researchers added.

    Google’s response could have profound impacts on the company’s AI endeavors moving forward. Although it is one of the leading companies in the field, if Google loses the respect of the AI community, it could quickly find itself struggling to attract top talent — especially if that talent has legitimate reason to believe it will be censored.

  • Google Extends Remote Work to September 2021

    Google Extends Remote Work to September 2021

    Google has moved back its return-to-office date from July to September 2021, and is looking to make flexible work a permanent option.

    Google was among the first companies to send its workers home at the outset of the pandemic. Like many companies that pivoted to remote work, Google has pushed back its return-to-office dates as the situation has evolved. The last date set was July, but the company is pushing that back to September, according to the New York Times.

    In an email to employees obtained by the NYT, CEO Sundar Pichai said the company is also looking to introduce a flexible work week post-pandemic. Employees would be expected to be in the office three days a week for collaboration, but could work from home the rest of the week.

    “We are testing a hypothesis that a flexible work model will lead to greater productivity, collaboration, and well-being,” wrote Pichai. “No company at our scale has ever created a fully hybrid work force model — though a few are starting to test it — so it will be interesting to try.”

    Hopefully many more companies follow Google’s example and make remote or flexible work options a standard.

  • Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Sundar Pichai has sent an email to Google employees in an effort to address backlash the company is facing over Dr. Timnit Gebru’s exit.

    Timnit Gebru is one of the leading artificial intelligence ethics researcher in the world, widely respected for her expertise. An issue arose as a result of a research paper Gebru and other researchers were working on. The paper tackled the ethical issues with large-scale AI language models (LLMs), and was approved internally on October 8. According to Gebru, she was later asked to remove her name from the paper because an internal review found it to be objectionable.

    As Gebru later pointed out in an interview with Wiredresearchers must be free to go where the research takes them.

    You’re not going to have papers that make the company happy all the time and don’t point out problems. That’s antithetical to what it means to be that kind of researcher.

    Google’s head of AI, Jeff Dean, said the paper was not submitted with the necessary two-week lead time. Gebru’s team, however, wrote in a blog post supporting Gebru that “this is a standard which was applied unevenly and discriminatorily.”

    As a result, Gebru gave her supervisors some conditions she wanted met, otherwise she would work toward an amicable exit from the company. According to her team, the conditions “were for 1) transparency around who was involved in calling for the retraction of the paper, 2) having a series of meetings with the Ethical AI team, and 3) understanding the parameters of what would be acceptable research at Google.”

    Instead of working with Gebru, her supervisors accepted her “resignation” effective immediately. Gebru’s team is quick to point out that “Dr. Gebru did not resign,” (italics theirs) and was instead terminated.

    The company’s actions brought swift and vocal backlash. Some 2,351 Googlers, along with 3,729 supporters in academia, industry and civil society have signed a petition in support of Gebru at the time of writing. It seems Pichai and Company realize the situation is not going away without being addressed.

    In an email to employees, first published by Axios, Pichai attempted to do damage control, apologizing for what happened and vowing to do better in the future.

    So far, the email has not been met with praise. Gebru took to Twitter to criticize the lack of accountability, as well as the insinuation she was an “angry Black woman” for whom a de-escalation strategy was needed.

    Similarly, others are criticizing Pichai’s email for essentially being tone-deaf. Jack Clark, Open AIPolicy Director, is one such voice.

    In our initial coverage of this situation, we stated: “It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation.”

    In the aftermath of Pichai’s email, that statement continues to ring true.

    Here’s the email in full:

    Hi everyone,

    One of the things I’ve been most proud of this year is how Googlers from across the company came together to address our racial equity commitments. It’s hard, important work, and while we’re steadfast in our commitment to do better, we have a lot to learn and improve. An important piece of this is learning from our experiences like the departure of Dr. Timnit Gebru.

    I’ve heard the reaction to Dr. Gebru’s departure loud and clear: it seeded doubts and led some in our community to question their place at Google. I want to say how sorry I am for that, and I accept the responsibility of working to restore your trust.

    First – we need to assess the circumstances that led up to Dr. Gebru’s departure, examining where we could have improved and led a more respectful process. We will begin a review of what happened to identify all the points where we can learn — considering everything from de-escalation strategies to new processes we can put in place. Jeff and I have spoken and are fully committed to doing this. One of the best aspects of Google’s engineering culture is our sincere desire to understand where things go wrong and how we can improve.

    Second – we need to accept responsibility for the fact that a prominent Black, female leader with immense talent left Google unhappily. This loss has had a ripple effect through some of our least represented communities, who saw themselves and some of their experiences reflected in Dr. Gebru’s. It was also keenly felt because Dr. Gebru is an expert in an important area of AI Ethics that we must continue to make progress on — progress that depends on our ability to ask ourselves challenging questions.

    It’s incredibly important to me that our Black, women, and underrepresented Googlers know that we value you and you do belong at Google. And the burden of pushing us to do better should not fall on your shoulders. We started a conversation together earlier this year when we announced a broad set of racial equity commitments to take a fresh look at all of our systems from hiring and leveling, to promotion and retention, and to address the need for leadership accountability across all of these steps. The events of the last week are a painful but important reminder of the progress we still need to make.

    This is a top priority for me and Google leads, and I want to recommit to translating the energy that we’ve seen this year into real change as we move forward into 2021 and beyond.

    — Sundar

  • Alphabet Beats Estimates On Advertising Rebound

    Alphabet Beats Estimates On Advertising Rebound

    Alphabet reported its third quarter results, beating consensus estimates, amid an increase in advertiser spending.

    Alphabet reported quarterly revenue of $46.2 billion, up from $40.5 billion the year-ago quarter. The company posted an $11.25 billion profit, or $10.12 a share. Executives attributed the results to the company’s investment in emerging technologies, such as AI, as well as a rebound in advertising spending. YouTube, in particular, brought in $5 billion in revenue.

    “We had a strong quarter, consistent with the broader online environment,” said Sundar Pichai, Chief Executive Officer of Alphabet and Google. “It’s also a testament to the deep investments we’ve made in AI and other technologies, to deliver services that people turn to for help, in moments big and small.”

    “Total revenues of $46.2 billion in the third quarter reflect broad based growth led by an increase in advertiser spend in Search and YouTube as well as continued strength in Google Cloud and Play,” said Ruth Porat, Chief Financial Officer of Alphabet and Google. “We remain focused on making the right investments to support long term sustainable value.”

    Alphabet is just the latest company to beat analysts’ estimates. Pinterest reported its results Wednesday, and also reported an outstanding quarter on advertising rebound. Apple likewise reported a record quarter on strong Mac, iPad and Services.

  • Google Sets Aside $1 Billion For News Publishers

    Google Sets Aside $1 Billion For News Publishers

    Google has at times been at odds with news publishers over the years, but is now trying to smooth things over to the tune of $1 billion.

    Google has long been accused of using its search dominance to strong-arm news publishers into letting it use their content without compensation. Google has claimed news publishers benefit far more than Google does by linking to and using their content. In contrast, both Apple and Facebook pay publishers for their news. Recent regulation, however, has increasingly put the pressure on Google to make adjustments.

    In a blog post, CEO Sundar Pichai highlighted Google’s strategy change:

    It’s equally important to Google’s mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. Over the last several years, we’ve taken many steps to support the news industry, from sending 24 billion visits to news websites globally every month, to the Google News Initiative’s $300 million commitment, including emergency funding for local publishers globally to help with the impact of COVID-19 and our Digital Growth Program aimed at small and medium-sized publishers to accelerate their business growth.

    But there is more to do. Today I’m proud to announce Google is building on our long-term support with an initial $1 billion investment in partnerships with news publishers and the future of news.

    This is a welcome development for publishers and may also help the company answer increasing allegations it is improperly using its search monopoly.

  • Google Extends Work From Home Through June 2021

    Google Extends Work From Home Through June 2021

    CEO Sundar Pichai has informed employees that eligible jobs will continue remotely through June 2021.

    As the coronavirus pandemic forced companies to send workers home, many wondered when things would return to normal. As initial measures to contain the pandemic seemed to make headway, companies began setting target dates to return to onsite work.

    Google had initially stated it would reopen offices on July 6, before pushing that back to September 7. Now, in a note the Wall Street Journal has gained access to, Pichai has said that any job not requiring onsite access will remain remote through June 30, 2021.

    “I know it hasn’t been easy,” Mr. Pichai wrote in the note. “I hope this will offer the flexibility you need to balance work with taking care of yourselves and your loved ones over the next 12 months.”

    Although a small number of roles require onsite access, the vast majority of Google’s roles allow for remote work. This makes the company one of the largest to extend work from home policies this far into the future.

  • Google Rethinks Its Plans to Open Offices

    Google Rethinks Its Plans to Open Offices

    Google is pushing back its plans to reopen offices amid a resurgence of the coronavirus pandemic.

    CEO Sundar Pichai had previously stated that offices would open on July 6. In recent weeks, however, several states have seen significant increases in the number of cases, with some also seeing increased hospitalizations.

    As a result, Google has pushed back its reopening date, saying that offices will remain closed until at least September 7. According to Bloomberg, Chris Rackow, Vice President of Global Security, informed employees via a memo.

    “While conditions do vary from state to state, we need to see that the U.S. outlook as a whole is stable before we move forward,” wrote Rackow. “As the recent resurgence of cases demonstrates, Covid-19 is still very much alive in our communities.”

    Many experts have said the pandemic would forever change how companies do business and interact with their employees. Some companies, such as Twitter, have said they plan on allowing employees to work from home forever.

    Only time will tell if Google is able to meet its new September 7 deadline, or if the pandemic will push it back even further.

  • Senator Hawley Questions Google CEO Over China Censorship

    Senator Hawley Questions Google CEO Over China Censorship

    YouTube is in hot water over claims it engaged in censorship on behalf of the Chinese government.

    In a letter to Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Senator Josh Hawley asked for an explanation about the alleged censorship. YouTube has explained the censorship occurred as a result of an error in its enforcement system, but has provided very little information beyond that. Understandably, the explanation is doing little to ease people’s concerns.

    In his letter to Pichai, Hawley says “that Google engineers may have changed the algorithms on YouTube to automatically censor certain criticisms of the Chinese Communist Party. In particular, Google engineers appear to have altered YouTube code to automatically block the Chinese terms for “communist bandit” and “50-cent party”—the latter term referring to a division of the Chinese Communist Party whose purpose is deflecting criticism from the Party by using sockpuppet accounts to spread online propaganda. These reports follow in the wake of Google’s purported ‘mis’-translation last year of the phrase ‘I am sad to see Hong Kong become part of China’ to ‘I am happy to see Hong Kong become part of China.’”

    Senator Hawley gave Pichai till June 12 to respond. It remains to be seen if Google will provide concrete information on the issue.

  • Google Giving Employees $1,000 to Help Work From Home

    Google Giving Employees $1,000 to Help Work From Home

    Google has become the latest company to allow employees to work from home for the rest of the year, and promised to give them $1,000 to help.

    In a blog post on Tuesday, CEO Sundar Pichai outlined the company’s policy, saying that the majority of Googlers will be able to work from home for the rest of the calendar year. For the small number of Googlers whose jobs require onsite work, they will be notified by June 10.

    “Because we still expect that most Googlers will be largely working from home for the rest of this year, we’ll be giving each Googler an allowance of $1,000 USD, or the equivalent value in your country, to expense necessary equipment and office furniture,” writes Pichai.

    In the meantime, the company expects long-term changes in how Googlers work, with more flexibility being the new status quo.

    “Moving ahead, we are looking to develop more overall flexibility in how we work,” says Pichai. “Our campuses are designed to enable collaboration and community—in fact, some of our greatest innovations were the result of chance encounters in the office—and it’s clear this is something many of us don’t want to lose. At the same time, we are very familiar with distributed work as we have many offices around the world and open-minded about the lessons we’ll learn through this period. We continue to study all the data and feedback you’re sharing on your current experience. I believe that ultimately these insights will lead to more flexibility and choice for employees as they consider how to work in the future.”

    This is likely welcome news on all fronts for Googlers, and hopefully the company will find new ways to meet its employees needs in a changed landscape.

  • Should Apple and Google CEOs Be Personally Responsible For Coronavirus Tracking App Privacy?

    Should Apple and Google CEOs Be Personally Responsible For Coronavirus Tracking App Privacy?

    In a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Senator Josh Hawley wants both CEOs to take personal responsibility for customer privacy.

    Apple and Google recently announced their efforts to working on coronavirus tracking apps that will use a common API and eliminate the incompatibilities that often plague iOS and Android interaction. The apps will use Bluetooth and operate on a decentralized model to ensure user privacy.

    Despite assurances by both companies that every effort is being made to protect privacy, Senator Hawley is not convinced. In particular, Hawley is concerned the anonymized data could be paired with other datasets to identify individuals and is calling on Cook and Pichai to put their money where their mouth is, so to speak.

    “Americans are right to be skeptical of this project,” writes Hawley. “Even if this project were to prove helpful for the current crisis, how can Americans be sure that you will not change the interface after the pandemic subsides? Once downloaded onto millions of phones, the interface easily could be edited to eliminate previous privacy protections. And any privacy protection that is baked into the interface will do little good if the apps that are developed to access the interface also choose to collect other information, like real-time geolocation data. When it comes to sticking to promises, Google’s record is not exactly reassuring. Last year a Google representative had to admit, under oath, that Google still tracks location history even when a person turns location history off. As the Associated Press put it, ‘Google wants to know where you go so badly that it records your movements even when you explicitly tell it not to.’”

    Interestingly, Hawley only makes mention of Google’s issues with privacy, as Apple has a well-earned reputation of being one of the strongest privacy advocates in the tech industry. Tim Cook has stated that Apple believes privacy is a fundamental human right, and the company’s actions support that claim. Even so, Hawley wants the executives of both companies to be personally liable for customer privacy, as it relates to any proposed coronavirus tracking app.

    “A project this unprecedented requires an unprecedented assurance on your part,” Hawley continues. “Too often, Americans have been burned by companies who calculated that the profits they could gain by reversing privacy pledges would outweigh any later financial penalty levied against the company. The last thing Americans want is to adopt, amid a global emergency, a tracking program that then becomes a permanent feature in our lives.

    “If you seek to assure the public, make your stake in this project personal. Make a commitment that you and other executives will be personally liable if you stop protecting privacy, such as by granting advertising companies access to the interface once the pandemic is over. The public statements you make now can be enforced under federal and state consumer protection laws. Do not hide behind a corporate shield like so many privacy offenders have before. Stake your personal finances on the security of this project.”

    The senator clearly voices concerns that millions of individuals have expressed in the wake of Apple and Google’s announcement. Hopefully, Senator Hawley’s letter will help ensure both companies do everything possible to protect user privacy.

  • Google Donating $800 Million to Small Businesses Amid Crisis

    Google Donating $800 Million to Small Businesses Amid Crisis

    With the fate of many small businesses on the line, Google is donating some $800 million to assist small businesses during the economic crisis.

    As the global health crisis worsens, companies around the world are closing shop or drastically changing how they conduct business. Many are facing uncertain futures, leading governments and companies to take measures to assist. Google is one of the latest to step up, pledging some $800 million to the effort.

    In a blog post, CEO Sundar Pichai said the company will be donating “$250 million in ad grants to help the World Health Organization (WHO) and more than 100 government agencies globally provide critical information.” This should help combat the spread of misinformation that is plaguing social media.

    In addition, the company is also setting aside “a $200 million investment fund that will support NGOs and financial institutions around the world to help provide small businesses with access to capital. As one example, we’re working with the Opportunity Finance Network in the U.S. to help fill gaps in financing for people and communities underserved by mainstream financial institutions. This is in addition to the $15 million in cash grants Google.org is already providing to nonprofits to help bridge these gaps for SMBs.”

    Google is also providing “$340 million in Google Ads credits available to all SMBs with active accounts over the past year. Credit notifications will appear in their Google Ads accounts and can be used at any point until the end of 2020 across our advertising platforms.” The company is also providing $20 million in Google Cloud credits that researchers can use to access Google’s computing resources.

    Overall, this is a significant effort on the part of Google to stimulate small businesses and help them weather the storm. By making Google Ad credits available, it should provide a relatively risk-free way for small businesses to keep advertising, despite the economic challenges.

  • Google Sued For Collecting Children’s Personal Data

    Google Sued For Collecting Children’s Personal Data

    Google is facing yet another privacy-related issue, with New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas suing the company for collecting children’s personal data.

    The suit stems from Google’s sale of its Chromebook devices to schools for their students’ use, along with the company’s G Suite of office software and email. According to the lawsuit, the company collects vast amounts of personal information, via the services, from students under 13 years-old and without parental consent.

    “Student safety should be the number one priority of any company providing services to our children, particularly in schools,” said Attorney General Balderas. “Tracking student data without parental consent is not only illegal, it is dangerous; and my office will hold any company accountable who compromises the safety of New Mexican children.”

    In a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Balderas expresses his concern about the dangers associated with the alleged data collection:

    “Because the data Google has illegally collected can then be spread across the globe through both legitimate and illegitimate means, I am bringing a lawsuit to immediately stop this practice. Data brokers and marketing technology firms that do business with Google have been credibly accused of targeting children under the age of 13 with age-inappropriate advertising. Worse yet, some of these same firms have suffered significant data breaches, causing personal information to end up for sale on the dark web, hosted in countries well beyond the reach of law enforcement. As Attorney General, I must take swift legal action in order to protect our children.”

    According to Reuters, Google has denied the allegations, calling them “factually wrong,” although they did not elaborate. We will continue to monitor the story and provide updates.

  • Coronavirus: Senators Express Privacy Concerns Over Google Screening Site

    Coronavirus: Senators Express Privacy Concerns Over Google Screening Site

    It was bound to happen: Senators have expressed concern about Google’s role in developing a site to help screen potential coronavirus patients.

    Google was caught off guard last week when President Trump said the company had 1,700 engineers working on a website designed to help screen potential coronavirus patients. In spite of the surprise, Google quickly got on board with the project and vowed to develop the site Trump had promised.

    Unfortunately for the company, however, Google doesn’t have the best track record with privacy and security. As a result, several senators have raised concerns about the project, in a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Joining Sen. Bob Menendez in sending the letter were Sens. Sherrod Brown, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and Richard Blumenthal.

    “There are numerous privacy concerns about such an endeavor, including: whether people will be required to sign waivers forfeiting their privacy and personal data in order to access the questionnaire; whether Google or any of its subsidiaries will be prohibited from using data received through the website for commercial purposes; and whether Google and any of its subsidiaries will be prohibited from selling any data collected through the website to a third-party.”

    The letter goes on to highlight the valuable nature of the data that will be collected and how much of a target it will be for hackers.

    “To state the obvious, the information Americans enter on this website will be highly valuable to potential hackers, foreign state and nonstate actors with nefarious intent, and other criminal enterprises,” the senators continue. “We are concerned that neither the Administration nor Google has fully contemplated the range of threats to Americans’ personally identifiable information.”

    Both points the letter raises are extremely pertinent. It was recently discovered that Google partnered with the Ascension healthcare group to collect the medical records of millions of American patients, without their knowledge. If patients are going to trust a website Google creates, they need to know their data is going to be used for the advertised purpose and not swallowed up into one of Google’s other commercial endeavors. Likewise, the data will represent a goldmine for hackers, requiring the very best in security technologies and processes.

    The senators certainly aren’t the only individuals questioning whether Google is up to the task—on both fronts.

  • Coronavirus: Google Will Show Businesses That Are Temporarily Closed

    Coronavirus: Google Will Show Businesses That Are Temporarily Closed

    As more restaurants, bars and businesses close in an attempt to blunt the spread of the coronavirus, Google Search and Maps will inform users.

    In a blog post on the company’s site, CEO Sundar Pichai outlined the various steps the company is taking to help fight the spread of the pandemic, including “promoting the ‘Do the Five’ campaign to raise awareness of simple measures people can take to slow the spread of the disease, according to the WHO.”

    Google is also working hard to fight misinformation regarding the pandemic. A big part of that has been removing videos that are dangerous or misleading from YouTube, as well as taking down false information, fake reviews and misleading information on Google Maps.

    The company is also working to help businesses inform customers via Search and Maps when they are temporarily closed as a result of the virus.

    “Based on data from governments and other authoritative sources, Google Search and Maps will now display if a place, like a school or local business, is temporarily closed,” continues Pichai. “In the coming days, we’ll make it possible for businesses to easily mark themselves as ‘temporarily closed’ using Google My Business. We’re also using our artificial intelligence (AI) technology Duplex where possible to contact businesses to confirm their updated business hours, so we can reflect them accurately when people are looking on Search and Maps.”

    These are welcome steps the search giant is taking to help individuals and businesses alike in the face of the pandemic.

  • The Company That Can End Privacy Just Ran Afoul of Twitter

    The Company That Can End Privacy Just Ran Afoul of Twitter

    Clearview AI, the company that made headlines last week for potentially ending privacy as we know it, has incurred the wrath of Twitter, according to The Seattle Times.

    New York Times journalist Kashmir Hill first reported on Clearview AI, a small, little-known startup that allows you to upload a photo and then compare it against a database of more than three billion photos the company has amassed. Clearview’s system will then show you “public photos of that person, along with links to where those photos appeared.”

    Clearview has built its database by scraping Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Venmo and millions of other websites for photos of people, something that is blatantly against most companies’ terms of service. The database is so far beyond anything the government has that some 600 law enforcement agencies have begun using Clearview—without any public scrutiny or a legislative stance on the legality of what Clearview does.

    To make matters even worse, once a person’s photos or social media profile has been scraped and added to the database, there is currently no way to have the company remove it. The only recourse available to individuals is to change the privacy settings of their social media profiles to prevent search engines from accessing them. This will stop Clearview from scraping any additional photos from their profile but, again, it does nothing to address any photos they may already have.

    At least one company is taking a strong stand against Clearview, namely Twitter. The Seattle Times is reporting that Twitter has sent Clearview a cease-and-desist demanding it stop scraping their site and user profiles for “any reason.” The cease-and-desist further demands that Clearview delete any and all data it has already collected from Twitter.

    Clearview is a prime example of what Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was talking about, in an op-ed he published in the Financial Times, when he said tech companies needed to take responsibility for the technology they create, not just charge ahead because they can. Similarly, Salesforce co-CEO Keith Block recently said the U.S. needed a national privacy law similar to the EU’s GDPR. If Clearview doesn’t make a case for such regulation…nothing will.

    In the meantime, here’s to hoping every other company and website Clearview has scraped for photos takes as strong a stance as Twitter.

  • AI Is More Profound Than Fire or Electricity, Says Google CEO

    AI Is More Profound Than Fire or Electricity, Says Google CEO

    AI is one of the most profound things we are working on as humanity,” says Google CEO Sundar Pichai. “It’s more profound than fire or electricity or any of the other bigger things we have worked on. It has tremendous positive sights to it but it has (potential) real negative consequences. When you think about technologies like facial recognition it can be used to benefit, it can be used to find missing people, but it can also be used for mass surveillance.”

    Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, discussed the massive potential for AI to change the world in a Bloomberg interview at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland:

    AI Is More Profound Than Fire or Electricity

    AI is one of the most profound things we are working on as humanity. It’s more profound than fire or electricity or any of the other bigger things we have worked on. It has tremendous positive sights to it but it has (potential) real negative consequences. When you think about technologies like facial recognition it can be used to benefit, it can be used to find missing people, but it can also be used for mass surveillance. 

    As democratic countries with a shared set of values, we need to build on those values and make sure when we approach AI we are doing it in a way that serves society. That means making sure AI doesn’t have bias, that we build and test it for safety, and we make sure that there is human agency that is ultimately accountable to people. 

    We Need a Common Framework By Which We Approach AI

    About 18 months ago we published a set of principles under which we would develop AI at Google. It’s been very encouraging to see the European Commissioners identifiy AI and sustainability as their top priorities. The US put out a set of principles last week and at the OECD or G20 they are talking about this. I think this is very very encouraging and I think we need a common framework by which we approach AI.

    It’s an early start but I am very encouraged that they have a lot of commonalities and that’s because they are rooted in common human values. So I think it’s a great start but we need to get more specific and evolve it significantly. The European Commission is working on a white paper around AI and I think that’s an important first step. We all need to engage. 

    As a company, we are committed to engaging in the process but it’s going to need everyone from around the world. AI is no different from climate, you can’t get safety by just having one country or a set of countries working on it. You need a global framework to arrive at a safer world there.

    AI Is More Profound Than Fire or Electricity, Says Google CEO Sundar Pichai
  • Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai Supports AI Regulation

    Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai Supports AI Regulation

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly becoming the ‘next big thing’ in the technology industry, with ramifications that are only now being discovered. At least one Silicon Valley giant believes the development of AI needs to be further regulated.

    In an op-ed for the Financial Times, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai lays out the case for stricter regulation over the development of AI. Pichai starts out citing examples of how Google’s AI developments are helping industries, including improving breast cancer screenings, weather forecasting and the company’s latest deal with Lufthansa to reduce the impact of flight delays.

    Pichai then highlights the potential dangers of burgeoning technology, technology that can do a lot of good but also be used to cause tremendous harm. In the realm of AI, he cites deepfakes as an example. Deepfakes are a type of AI-assisted photo and video manipulation designed to make it appear as if someone has said or done something they haven’t by transposing their face or head onto another person’s body. Companies such as Facebook and Reddit have taken measures to minimize the damage deepfakes can do, but experts fear the worst is yet to come as the technology matures and advances.

    As a result of the potential for AI to be used improperly or dangerously, Pichai outlines Google’s stand, including emphasizing the importance of companies taking responsibility for the technology they create, market and benefit from. Rather than simply opening Pandora’s Box and leaving others to sort out the mess, Pichai says companies have the responsibility to make sure the technology they create is used for good.

    “Now there is no question in my mind that artificial intelligence needs to be regulated,” Pichai writes. “It is too important not to.”

    The CEO goes on to highlight the European Union’s GDPR privacy laws as a “strong foundation” for future regulation. Given that Google has often been accused of not respecting user privacy, it’s encouraging to see Pichai cite one of the most comprehensive privacy regulations as a template for moving forward.

    All in all, Pichai’s op-end is a fascinating insight into the thoughts of one of the individuals who has a tremendous influence over the future of AI and well worth a read in its entirety at the Financial Times.