WebProNews

Tag: Consumer Reports

  • Toyota Prius Tops Best-Value List For Second Year

    Motorists in the U.S. may have noticed the trend in the past few years of more Toyota Prius vehicles on the road. There’s good reason for this trend above the environmental concerns that so often surround conversations about hybrid vehicles: the Prius simply give customers great value for its price.

    Consumer Reports this week announced that the Toyota Prius has topped its best overall new-car value list for 2013. This marks the second year in a row that the Prius has topped the list.

    According to Consumer Reports, the Prius’ fuel economy, performance, and reliability put it once again at the top of the list. The report estimates the Prius’ five-year ownership costs at just $0.47 per mile.

    “The Prius’ 44 mpg overall is the best fuel economy of any non-plug-in car that Consumer Reports has tested,” said Rik Paul, automotive editor at Consumer Reports. “Though it’s not particularly cheap to buy, the Prius’ depreciation is so low that it costs less to own over the first five years than its initial MSRP. We call that a bargain.”

    Toyota’s Avalon Hybrid Limited also earned high marks from Consumer Reports in its large cars value rankings. Other vehicles to be mentioned for their high value include the Honda Fit the Subaru Legacy 2.5i Premium, and the Lexus ES 300h, which topped the luxury cars category.

    On the other end of the spectrum, the Nissan Armada was cited as having the worst value for a new car. Consumer Reports points to the car’s low 13 mpg fuel economy and poor reliability as factors in the ranking. The Armada was scored with $1.20 per mile five-year ownership costs. Other lower-value cars included the Volkswagen Beetle 2.5L and the Nissan Altima 3.5 SL.

    “Just because a car is cheap to buy doesn’t mean it’s a good value,” said Paul. “The Nissan Versa Sedan, for example, is one of the least expensive cars that Consumer Reports has tested. For about $1,500 more, we’d go with a Honda Fit, which is fun to drive, cheaper to own, more reliable, and provides almost twice the value.”

  • Many Americans Still Putting-Off Holiday Shopping

    This year’s Black Friday was a sales success, with customers spending more money on a variety of heavily discounted prices.

    Not everyone has finished up their holiday shopping, however. In fact, a sizable chunk of the American population has yet to even purchase one present.

    A new Consumer Reports survey today shows that 31% of Americans (the ones who plan to buy gifts for the holidays, anyway) had not yet bought any gifts for the holidays as of “early December.” Only about half (51%) of Americans at that time reported that they were at least halfway done with their holiday shopping.

    “Even though this year [there are] less days on the calendar to get their holiday shopping done, there are still quite a bit of procrastinators out there,” said Tod Marks, senior editor and resident shopping expert at Consumer Reports. “The 11 percent who told us they’ve completely finished shopping already have certainly saved themselves the stress of frantically searching for last-minute gifts.”

    Those American putting off their shopping certainly feel the pressure. The Consumer Report survey found that 36% of those surveyed are feeling stressed about holiday shopping. Another 6% felt unsure as to whether they will be ready in time for celebrations, and 3% were “almost certain” they aren’t going to make it.

    The survey also found some interesting statistics on American opinions of the holidays.

    Of those surveyed, 30% stated that their significant other is hardest to shop for, though 25% found it hardest to shop for a parent.

    A large majority of Americans (82%) said that they would prefer a practical gift over a luxury one, while 60% said they would prefer cash over gift cards. A majority of those surveyed (56%) also prefer an artificial Christmas tree over the real deal.

  • Majority of Americans Will Not Shop on Black Friday

    Majority of Americans Will Not Shop on Black Friday

    With stores opening on Thanksgiving day for Black Friday deals this year, consumers are now under more pressure than ever to fit cut-rate shopping into their holiday schedules. Though millions of Americans will line-up and fight over the inexpensive electronics and toys on Friday, it appears that most Americans will not be tempted by this weekend’s sales.

    A new Consumer Reports survey has shown that 56% of Americans do not plant to shop at all this holiday weekend, either in stores or online. Though a majority of Americans will still avoid Black Friday, the 44% who will do some shopping this weekend represent a 14% increase from last year’s Black Friday.

    “Those who intend to go out shopping on Black Friday probably know what to expect, and to them that’s part of the allure,” said Tod Marks, senior editor for Consumer Reports. “However, it’s easy to get caught up in the shopping frenzy and spend more than you really want to. That’s why it’s important to do your homework beforehand, have a plan and stick to it.”

    Of the American majority who will skip shopping this weekend, most of them (70%) cited the large Black Friday crowds as the reason they will opt out. Just over one-third of them (34%) believe that Black Friday deals are “too overhyped” and 30% simply don’t want to get up early. 33% would rather “do something else” such as spend time with family, which 29% of those not shopping this weekend would rather do.

    For those who will brave the cold and the crowds this Friday (and this year, Thursday), a majority (55%) simply can’t resist the low prices and plan to shop this weekend because the specials will be “the best deals of the year.” 43% also cite the “door-buster deals” as the reason for shopping this weekend, while a full 23% of those planning on shopping this Black Friday now consider it to be a tradition.

  • Sprint Tanks in New Consumer Satisfaction Survey

    With smartphone industry growth in North American now slowing, mobile providers in the U.S. are getting creative to scoop up the last few customers who have yet to sign up for mobile plans and to maintain their large subscriber bases. T-Mobile has been wildly successful at this in the past year, with its market share and subscriber base both growing substantially this summer on the back of its “uncarrier” initiatives such as “Jump!

    As T-Mobile quickly rises from its position as the fourth largest mobile provider in the U.S., third place carrier Sprint is heading the opposite direction. The company saw a $1.6 billion loss during its second quarter this year while also losing 2.7 million subscribers.

    This new reality is reflected in a new Consumer Reports survey that shows Sprint is now the lowest-rated carrier out of the big four in the U.S. Though Sprint ranked second in the same survey one year ago, the company has now fallen hard, with consumer ratings of its value, voice network, and 4G service all falling.

    “Our latest cell service satisfaction survey revealed a somewhat precipitous decline by Sprint that shuffled the rankings of the major standard service providers,” said Glenn Derene, team leader for Electronics Content Development at Consumer Reports. “And smaller, no-frills, no-contract and prepaid service providers continue to do a better job of satisfying customers, and provide an increasingly viable alternative to some of the expensive, long-term contracts that many consumers find themselves locked into.”

    Verizon continued to top the customer satisfaction list for major U.S. carriers on the back of high consumer ratings for its data network and customer support. AT&T and T-Mobile came in second and third with average ratings for their services, though AT&T did get what Consumer Reports describes as a “top rating” for its 4G network.

  • Best, Worst Airlines of 2013 Ranked by Consumer Reports

    Flying can be one of the most unpleasant experiences in life. Even if passengers’ eardrums aren’t bombarded by crying babies or some woman singing Whitney Houston songs, the prices, accommodations, and service can often leave a lot to be desired.

    This week, Consumer Reports has shed some light on the variations of the flying experience that can be found on different airlines. The publication has ranked U.S. airlines from best to worst in its latest issue of Consumer Reports magazine. The rankings are based on a survey of 16,000 people conducted in February. The survey included questions about comfort, baggage handling, check-in service, fees, and in-flight entertainment.

    The top-ranked airlines will come as no surprise for frequent flyers. Virgin America topped the list due to its leather seat cushions and free bag checking. Jet Blue and SouthWest also placed highly for their baggage handling and service, though Jet Blue scored higher than SouthWest for cleanliness and comfort.

    On the other side of the list, Spirit Airlines scored what Consumer Reports says is one of the lowest overall scores it has ever given. Though Spirit charges much lower airfare than almost any other airline, the company makes up for its low ticket prices by charging flyers for nearly everything they can. This includes fees for flight booking, carry-on bags, checked bags, in-flight snacks, and having a ticket agent print a boarding pass,

  • Tesla Review From Consumer Reports Is Publication’s Best-Ever For A Car

    Tesla Review From Consumer Reports Is Publication’s Best-Ever For A Car

    The 2013 Tesla Model S has received a rave review from Consumer Reports. This was just published (though a subscriptions is required), and is bound to be huge for the car maker.

    The car got a 99 out of 100, which is reportedly the highest it has ever rated a car. Here’s Consumer Reports’ overview:

    The Tesla Model S takes everything you know about cars and stands it on its head. It’s a very agile, super-quick electric luxury sedan (with a hatchback!) that seats seven and gets the equivalent of 84 mpg. Got your attention yet? With the 85 kWh battery, the largest available, it can go between 180 and 225 miles on a charge, depending on the weather. That’s about twice as far as any other electric car. With optional equipment, it can be charged from empty in as little as five hours. Performance all-around is exceptional, with short stops, a superb ride, and an eerily hushed cabin. Almost all controls are done through a quick and capable iPad-like center screen. Tight access and visibility and initial teething pains are demerits, as is the luxury-car price.

    Here’s their quick take:

    “We’ve been testing cars at Consumer Reports for a very long time, but we’ve never seen anything quite like the Tesla Model S,” says Jake Fisher, Director, Auto Testing at Consumer Reports. “This car performs better than anything we’ver ever tested before. Let me repeat that – not just the best electric car, but the best car. It does just about everything really, really well.”

    The car, he says, ties as the quietest car they’ve ever tested, in addition to be extremely energy efficient.

    It turns out that 99 out of 100 was originally 110 out of 100. Matt Hardigree at Gawker’s Jalopnik says:

    I spoke with CR’s Jake Fisher who explained to me that the car actually scored 110 out of a 100-point scale, but that because of the limitations still inherent in owning an electric car (range, access to charging) they regularly subtract about 10% from a car’s score. It’s still the best score they’ve ever given, tied only with the 2007 Lexus LS but that car, according to Fisher, isn’t even in the same league as the Model S.

    The car is designed and built in California. The rear wheel drive vehicle does not use gasoline, and is engineered to perform in both hot and cold climates. It accelerates to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds, according to Tesla (though Consumer Reports said a “lightning quick 5.6 seconds”). More specs here.

  • Energy Drinks May Contain More Caffeine Than You Think

    Consumer Reports today published a report on the level of caffeine in popular energy drinks. Their findings suggest that many of the energy drinks Americans consume on a daily basis have wildly varying levels of caffeine, and in some cases have more than anyone might suspect.

    Consumer Reports purchased 27 popular energy drinks from stores in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey. It tested three lots of each beverage for the caffeine, sugars, and calories found in one serving of the beverage. An average 8-ounce cup of coffee has around 100mg. of caffeine.

    Topping the list is 5-hour Energy Extra Strength, which has an incredible 242mg. of caffeine in just 1.9fl. oz. of liquid. Following that is Rosckstar Energy Shot with 229mg. of caffeine and NOS High Performance with 224mg, though that is a 16fl. oz. beverage.

    Monster Beverage’s Monster X-presso placed fourth highest on the list with 221mg. of caffeine in 6.8fl. oz. of liquid. Regular Monster Energy drinks showed up near the middle of the chart, with 92mg. of caffeine in 8fl. oz. of liquid. This may seem surprising, since Monster Beverage has recently come under fire for the high caffeine content of its drinks.

    Just this week, the family of a 14-year-old girl who died of caffeine toxicity sued Monster Beverage over the death. The lawsuit alleges that the girl consumed two 24fl. oz. cans of Monster Energy drinks in under 24 hours shortly before dying. Going by Consumer Reports’ measurements, that works out to 552mg. of caffeine the girl consumed. Consumer Reports states that “data suggests” healthy adults can consume up to 400mg. of caffeine per day, while children can handle up to 45mg. or 85mg., depending on their weight.

    Oddly enough, a 5-hour Energy drink, the company’s “decaf” shot, also placed as having the least caffeine content of the drinks tested with only 6mg. of caffeine. Red Bull, perhaps the most well-known energy drink in U.S. markets, placed near the middle of the pack with 83mg. of caffeine.

  • Netflix Users Aren’t Really That Keen On Netflix

    Netflix Users Aren’t Really That Keen On Netflix

    Despite vigorous efforts from competitors to dethrone them, Netflix remains the most popular streaming service out there. This is mighty impressive considering the fact that Netflix’s public image went through the wringer last year – with the price hike, and the incredibly short-lived and short-sided Qwikster idea and all.

    In fact, a new report from Consumer Reports found that 81% of their survey respondents said they have used Netflix Instant (streaming service) in the past month. That’s a huge share of the streaming market.

    But here’s the thing: Their survey didn’t just look at subscriber figures, but it also considered customer satisfaction. And in that department, Netflix finished far from the top spot.

    Out of an overall score of 100, Netflix’s subscriber satisfaction score came in at 69. That put Netflix in sixth place on the list of streaming video providers. Vudu took the top spot with a score of 76. In between those two, in order, fell iTunes, Amazon Instant Video, Amazing Prime and Hulu.

    Of course, with such a large user base, Netflix is ripe for plenty of bad feedback. While 81% said they stream using Netflix, only 2-14% used the other services mentioned in the survey.

    According to Consumer Reports, the biggest problem that was cited by those who scored Netflix low on the satisfaction scale was a lack of quality content. It’s true that Netflix has suffered some pretty significant content losses due to failed deals – Starz comes to mind.

    But, Netflix is ramping up the production of original content, which could be a big draw for the service in the future. Between original series like Lilyhammer and upcoming exclusives like the new season of Arrested Development, Netflix could make up for some of the lost studio content with their own shows.

    Just don’t expect any sort of content deal with HBO in the near future.

    Earlier this week, Netflix released their Q2 earnings report which showed a return to profitability.

    [via CNET]

  • Every Poll Ever: Nobody Likes Being Tracked Online

    Internet privacy is steadily becoming the battle meme of 2012 and as the topic permeates the household vocabulary, one fact emerges more salient than any other: people don’t want to be tracked.

    To wit: a Consumer Reports survey released yesterday reveals that 71% of internet users are “very concerned” about the way companies are collecting and distributing user information gathered from their internet activity. Among consumers concerns:

  • 58% weren’t too keen on advertisers targeting children with personalized ads.
  • 56% didn’t like the idea of companies holding onto users’ data.
  • 44% were wary of being targeted for personalized ads because of their browsing interests and online purchases.
  • A separate poll conducted by the Los Angeles Times and USC Dornsife revealed that nobody really trusts the Silicon Valley pantheon with their personal information. In a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 meaning absolute trust and 0 meaning “I wouldn’t trust them to change my lightbulbs,” no company scored above a 5. Apple scored the highest at 4.6; Google followed at 3.8, LinkedIn at 3.0, YouTube at 2.8, Facebook at 2.7, and Twitter bringing up the rear at 2.4. Beyond that, 82% of California voters said they are “very/somewhat concerned” about companies tracking their internet activity.

    If that wasn’t enough, Google’s own Justin Cutroni had a rude awakening when he decided to use Google’s recently released Consumer Surveys tool and asked Google users if they thought businesses should be able to anonymously track your actions on their website. A walloping 84.7% replied with a resounding “No.” It was amusing to see Cutroni attempt to minimize what seemed like a backhanded rebuttal to Google’s own practices: “I was a bit surprised!”

    Poll after poll, the point is clear: nobody wants to be tracked. More polls will surely be conducted in order to show us this fact we already know. So the question is, who among these tech companies is screwing up? If the practice of tracking user information online is really not such a bad thing, then companies like Facebook and Google need to start over with a new stable of handlers because the current ones effectively suck at convincing consumers that they mean no harm. To his credit, Cutroni did remark on the Google Consumer Polls results that Google “really needs to explain what we do and why we do it.”

    Until then, the majority of people are going to operate – possibly correctly – that all data-collecting tech companies are up to no good. Without a satisfying, fear-extinguishing explanation, why should people presume otherwise?

    And if tech companies can’t sufficiently and truthfully explain the practice in a way that allays any concern of consumers, then it probably means that the companies are, in fact, up to no good.

  • $100,000 Later, Still No Reliable Transportation

    A fun story for those of us who think are cars suck because we’re poor and we can’t afford anything better. Consumer Reports purchased the new Fisker Karma, electric hybrid plug-in to test and evaluate for their readers. It cost them nearly $108,000 and as they put it, “It is super sleek, high-tech—and now it’s broken”.

    They only have around 200 miles on the odometer and haven’t finished checking it in to get it ready for their normal series of road tests and intense analysis before they report back to readers what they’ve found. Apparently they pulled it out into the track to calibrate the speedometer, which is a common test, and the transmission deactivated as the dash flashed an alarm claiming there was a “major fault”. That doesn’t sound good?

    After letting it sit, the light went out, but the transmission still wouldn’t engage. That left them with just two options- park and neutral. According to the staff, they don’t recall a time, even after purchasing over 80 automobiles, that one has ever left them stranded like this. So don’t feel bad if your decade-old ride is giving you trouble. It seems even spending $100,000 doesn’t buy you the peace of mind you’d think it would.

    Check out their video:

    The car looks awesome! I don’t feel like this is a good bit of press for an up and coming car company. The dealership was 100 miles away from Consumer Reports test track, so that’s not exactly convenient for anyone. I hope it gets sorted out, I would really like to hear them review the car. As for the rest of us, we can just be happy our POS are getting us to work everyday. Thanks for the entertainment Consumer Reports.

  • AT&T Rated Lowest Service Provider By Consumer Reports

    AT&T Rated Lowest Service Provider By Consumer Reports

    In a year where AT&T was prevented from acquiring T-Mobile, dealt a lawsuit by Sprint, ran afoul with the FCC, and then got ensnared in the Carrier IQ debacle, they have to be eager to put this year behind them.

    Unfortunately, 2011 isn’t over yet and it’s still got some despair in store for AT&T.

    Consumer Reports released the results of their annual satisfaction survey today and, probably to the surprise of exactly no one, AT&T was rated the lowest among the four largest cellphone service providers in the United States for the second year in a row. Ranked worse than Verizon (which scored the highest), Spring, and erstwhile AT&T acquisition T-Mobile, the report deals AT&T some damaging news – and this isn’t even the full report yet so who knows what terrors lurk ahead for AT&T once the entirety of the results go public. Then again, maybe it’s old news to AT&T since they’re on a losing streak lately.

    The report assesses customers’ satisfaction in areas of general service as well as customer-support experience. The full details of the report will be made available in the January 2012 issue of Consumer Reports. If you can’t wait to see all the ways in which the survey damns AT&T, consider what last year’s survey unloaded:

    Over half of the survey respondents who used AT&T as a carrier owned some version of the iPhone, the Apple smart phone that is exclusive to AT&T, at least for now. Consumer Reports data, reflecting all versions of the phone, found that iPhone owners were much less satisfied with their carrier and rated data service (Web and e-mail) lower than owners of smart phones on other carriers that, like the iPhone, have a host of apps to encourage heavy data use.

    “Our survey suggests that an iPhone from Verizon Wireless, which is rumored, could indeed be good news for iPhone fans,” said Paul Reynolds, Electronics Editor for Consumer Reports.

    Not only did the prediction of a Verizon-based iPhone come true but Sprint customers got the opportunity to get their paws on an iPhone, as well, so it will be curious to see if the wider availability of iPhones affected cellphone users’ selection of service provider.

    If you’re an AT&T subscriber, how do you feel about this report? Does it sound pretty familiar to your experience?

  • iPad 2 Gets High Marks from Consumer Reports

    Apple’s iPad 2 with Wi-Fi and 3G was rated the best tablet on the market by Consumer Reports. This is particularly interesting, given Consumer Reports’ recent history of not recommending Apple’s iOS products.

    Last summer, Consumer Reports gave the iPhone 4 a thumbs down, citing the widely-publicized antenna issues. A similar evaluation was given earlier this year for Verizon’s version. Consumer reports had not problem recommending a variety of Android devices.

    Until recently, the iPad didn’t really have much in the way of competition, in terms of tablets, but the iPad 2 has more , and has managed to come out on top. The antenna issues don’t apply to the iPad, so it makes sense.

    “So far Apple is leading the tablet market in both quality and price, which is unusual for a company whose products are usually premium priced,” said Paul Reynolds, Electronics Editor at Consumer Reports. “However, it’s likely we’ll see more competitive pricing in tablets as other models begin to hit the market.”

    The battery life of the iPad 2 seems to be one of the main factors in Consumer Reports’ evaluation. They tested ten tablets by playing the same video clip over and over again until they died. The iPad 2 lasted 12.2 hours. The lowest-ranked tablet (the Archos 70 Internet Tablet) only lasted 3.8 hours.

    Reynolds is certainly right in that pricing will only get much more competitive. In fact, this is one of the main reasons Android has managed to gain so much smartphone market share. The platform is available on a wide range of devices of varying prices – many of them far cheaper than Apple’s iPhones.

    We can expect a similar trend in the tablet market. We’re in the very early stages. Of couse there are also non-Android competitors that will become bigger parts of the equation, like offerings from RIM, HP, and Microsoft.

  • Verizon iPhone 4 Gets Called Out By Consumer Reports

    Consumer Reports blasted the iPhone 4 when it first came out for AT&T, citing reception problems. You may recall Apple’s "antennagate" scandal, where it gave away free bumpers to make up for the issue. Now, Consumer Reports is making a similar case for Verizon’s incarnation of the iPhone 4.

    The nonprofit organization says, "Bottom Line: The Verizon iPhone 4 closely resembles the original AT&T iPhone 4 in many positive respects, including offering great multimedia functionality, a sharp screen, and the best MP3 player we’ve seen on a phone. Unfortunately, it also shares with its sibling the possibility of compromised performance in low-signal conditions when used without a bumper or case."

    "We looked at five other smartphones in the verizon network, and none of them have this problem," said Consumer Reports’ Mike Gikas. "While the Verizon iPhone is highly rated, we’re not adding it to the list of our recommended smartphones."

    While the approval of Consumer Reports clearly hasn’t been a huge obstacle for Apple’s sales in the past, one can’t help but wonder how much better they would have been otherwise. There are a lot of people that look to the organization for guidance on purchases. 

    Consumer Reports has given recommendations for numerous Android devices in the smartphone category. 

    Consumer Reports does have an iPhone app that it launched in the fall. The app, which costs $9.99 provides users with access to ratings, recommendations, brand reliability information, and buying advice for appliances, electronics, children’s products, care care, and home products.

  • Consumer Reports Introduces iPhone App

    Consumer Reports Introduces iPhone App

    Consumer Reports has introduced a new app for iPhone users,which provides access to ratings, recommendations, brand reliability,  and buying advice for appliances, electronics, children’s products, car care, and home products.

    The app, called Consumer Reports Mobile Shopper, is available for download for $9.99

    The app allows users to research purchases by scanning the UPC barcode; searching for the make and model; or browsing through  Consumer Reports expert Ratings.  The information includes model comparisons, user reviews, the CR Best Buy, and CR recommendations.

     

    Consumer-Reports-iPhone

     

    “The new app puts the power of Consumer Reports in consumers’ pockets when they are shopping, allowing them to access Ratings, compare prices, locate better-value retailers and share recommendations with friends," said Jerry Steinbrink, vice president, Publishing, Consumer Reports.  

    "This newest delivery system nicely complements our suite of media offerings."

    *Features of the app include the ability for iPhone users to:

    *Shop online or shop locally:  find the best deals online or at nearby retail stores.

    *Share deals or product ideas with friends and family via email or Facebook .

    Consumer Reports said it is currently working on a version of its app  for Android.

     

     

  • Consumer Reports Recommends Numerous Android Devices

    While Apple may have dominated the headlines with iPads and iPhones, 2010 has been a pretty good year for Android. Now Consumer Reports is recommending a variety of Android devices.

    Android Headlines points to September’s issue of Consumer Reports, which ranks smartphones. Eight different ones made the "Recommend List" including:

    – Motorola Droid
    – HTC Droid Incredible
    – HTC Droid Eris
    – HTC myTouch 3G Slide
    – Google Nexus One
    – HTC Evo 4G
    – HTC Hero
    – Samsung moment

    Android Devices Recommended by Consumer ReportsThis has to rub Apple the wrong way, as the publication declared recently that it could not recommend the iPhone 4, following the "Antennagate" debacle.

    Last week, the NPD Group released a report finding that one in three smartphones shipped in the U.S. are Android devices. This moved Android up over RIM for the first time.

    Meanwhile, as the global smartphone market grew by 50% year over year in the 2nd quarter, according to IDC, Google’s partners saw some growth of their own. HTC and Samsung posted the highest year-over-year growth rates among the top vendors in the space.

  • Consumer Reports Gives iPhone 4 a Thumbs Down

    Today, Consumer Reports called it "official". The iPhone 4 has reception problems. The organization says it reached the conclusion after testing three iPhone 4s purchased from separate retailers, in a controlled environment. Meanwhile, reports have surfaced that a class action lawsuit against  Apple & ATT from iPhone owners has been approved by a federal judge. Not a lot of great news for Apple at the moment, despite the impressive sales of the company’s recent releases.

    RIM’s BlackBerry 6 is due out this summer, and the company gave the public a new sneak peek today:

    A new Google Labs project has been unveiled, and could have huge implications for the future of Android. Google App Inventor provides a way for anybody (with or without developer skills) to create their own Android apps. If this catches on, it could fuel Android growth and inspire all kinds of creativity from the less-technically savvy. We’re having an interesting discussion about this with readers on our Facebook page.

    Microsoft had numerous demos and announcements today from its Worldwide Partner Conference. For one, the company unveiled Dynamics CRM 2011 along with Dynamics Marketplace. The company also unveiled partners (including eBay) for its Windows Azure platform appliance. Microsoft also released Windows Phone Developer Tools and the second public beta of Windows Intune. CEO Steve Ballmer also had some interesting things to say about Windows 7 tablets.

  • Social Network Users Posting Too Much Personal Information

    More than half (52%) of social network users in the U.S. have posted personal information such as their full birth date which can make them vulnerable to cyber attacks, according to a new survey from Consumer Reports.

    Consumer Reports’ State of the Net survey found that 9 percent of social network users experienced some form of abuse within the past year, such as malware infections, scams, identity theft or harassment.

    Users who post personal information, such as their full birth dates, photos and names of children, home address and when they will be away from home, are the most vulnerable to cybercrime.

    Consumer-Reports

    "Many people use social networking sites to share personal information and photos with their friends quickly and easily," said Jeff Fox, Technology Editor for Consumer Reports.

     ."However there are serious risks involved which can be lessened by using privacy controls offered by the sites."

    The survey also found 42 percent of Facebook users post their full birth date, 16 percent post their children’s names, 7 percent their home address and 3 percent information about when they will not be home.