WebProNews

Tag: Australia

  • Australia May Ban Ransomware Payments

    Australia May Ban Ransomware Payments

    Australia is considering a measure to ban companies from making ransomware payments to cybercriminals.

    Ransomware is one of the fastest growing cybersecurity threats, and has taken a toll on public and private organizations alike. Most government and law enforcement agencies discourage victims from paying, but The Record is reporting that Australia is considering taking it a step further.

    Australia has been hit hard by several ransomware attacks and the country is clearly trying to discourage further attacks by making it impossible for victims to pay.

    Clare O’Neil, home affairs and cybersecurity minister, confirmed to ABC that the government was considering the proposal.

  • AWS Scores Australian Government Cloud Contract Renewal

    AWS Scores Australian Government Cloud Contract Renewal

    AWS has secured an renewal of its whole-of-government cloud deal with the Australian government, extending the contract by three years.

    AWS initially signed its cloud contract agreement with the Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) in 2019. The contract provides AWS services to federal, state, and territorial departments, agencies, public universities, and government-controlled companies.

    The new agreement builds on the previous one, extending the company’s commitment to Australia’s public sector.

    Under the enhanced agreement, which will start on May 1, 2022, AWS’s public sector customers continue to receive the benefits of the Whole-of Government Agreement via the DTA, or they can choose to purchase directly from AWS or through authorised partners on the AWS Partner Network. This will ensure our public sector customers in Australia will maintain easy access to our reliable and secure cloud services as well as provide greater choice in how they procure them.

    The contract is valued at AU$174 million.

  • ’AUKUS’ — Australia, UK, US Form Security Partnership to Counter China

    ’AUKUS’ — Australia, UK, US Form Security Partnership to Counter China

    Australia, the UK and US have formed a new security partnership in an effort to better counter China.

    Dubbed AUKUS, the partnership between the three countries is aimed at improving cyber capabilities, AI, quantum technologies and other undersea capabilities. The US and UK are interested in helping the Royal Australian Navy acquire nuclear-powered submarines. The arrangement does not mean Australia will become a full-fledged nuclear power, as Australia reaffirmed its commitment to nuclear non-proliferation and not pursuing nuclear weapons.

    Despite the limited scope of the arrangement, a senior US administration official highlighted the advantages of nuclear-powered submarines:

    I do want to underscore that this will give Australia the capability for their submarines to basically — to deploy for longer periods. They’re quieter. They’re much more capable. They will allow us to sustain and to improve deterrence across the Indo-Pacific. 

    The official also highlighted the significance of sharing such technology with Australia, technology the US has only previously shared with the UK.

    I just want to underscore that this is a fundamental decision — fundamental — that binds decisively Australia to the United States and Great Britain for generations. 

    While China was not specifically mentioned in the briefing, sources told Politico the agreement was, at least in part, to counter China’s growing military power.

  • Facebook and Google Bring Fight Over News to the US

    Facebook and Google Bring Fight Over News to the US

    After being forced to work with Australian news publishers, Facebook and Google are going on the offensive in the US.

    Australia introduced legislation to force tech companies to pay for the news they link to and use. Both Facebook and Google vehemently objected, with the former briefly blocking all Australian news from its platform and the latter threatening to pull out of the country. Ultimately, both companies came to an agreement with Australian regulators and news publishers, but they clearly don’t want a repeat in the US.

    According to NBC News, both companies are stepping up their fight against a bill that was introduced in the US to address the perceived inequality between large tech platforms and the news publishers that rely on them. Google has even gone so far as to launch a website touting its support of the news publishing industry.

    To be fair, there are concerns the bill could put too much power in the hands of big publishers, as well as conglomerates that control multiple newspapers and media outlets. Nonetheless, supporters of the bill, such as Sen. Amy Klobuchar, emphasized the need for a level playing field.

    “We have to have an even playing field and allow people to negotiate,” she said in a congressional hearing.

    Not all tech giants are opposed to increased legislation. Microsoft not only sided with the Australian efforts, but has also been assisting EU publishers in efforts to duplicate that success. The company has also outspokenly voiced support for such efforts in the US.

  • Huawei May Be Pivoting to Electric Vehicles

    Huawei May Be Pivoting to Electric Vehicles

    After suffering devastating losses as a result of US sanctions, Huawei may be preparing to pivot to electric vehicles.

    Huawei quickly found itself a target of the Trump administration, amid claims the company represented a national security threat. While all Chinese firms are required to cooperate with Beijing, Huawei was widely believed to have unusually close ties with the government and intelligence community. As a result, the Trump administration banned the company from participating in US networks, and there is no indication the Biden administration will reverse those measures.

    Other countries have followed suit, including the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Sweden. Multiple governments and intelligence agencies have joined the US in branding Huawei a threat.

    The bans and sanction have taken a toll on the company, once an almost unstoppable force in the tech industry. Sanctions against the company have even resulted in it selling its Honor line of smartphones and cutting production of its flagship line, due to not being able to buy enough semiconductors.

    According to Reuters, the company is now exploring a strategic shift to electric vehicle manufacturing as a result of the challenges it’s facing. Reuters sources say the company is preparing to make electric vehicles under its own brand, and the first models could arrive as soon as this year.

    A company spokesman denied the claims, although the denial left plenty of room for interpretation.

    “Huawei is not a car manufacturer. However through ICT (information and communications technology), we aim to be a digital car-oriented and new-added components provider, enabling car OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) to build better vehicles.”

  • Microsoft Bringing Australian-Style Paid News to the EU

    Microsoft Bringing Australian-Style Paid News to the EU

    Microsoft is working to help EU publishers get paid for their news, similar to an Australian law that would enforce the same thing.

    The Australian government began a showdown with Google and Facebook with proposed legislation that would force tech companies to pay for the news they quote and link to. Google has traditionally been opposed to such measures, claiming news publishers benefit far more than it does from its use of their news. Similarly, Facebook has also bitterly opposed the new legislation. While Google ultimately began working out paid deals, Facebook escalated the showdown by blocking Australians from posting or linking to news.

    In the meantime, Microsoft has set itself apart by being willing to cooperate with Australia from the outset. The company even worked with the government to assure legislators it could pick up any additional search volume, should Google be unwilling to play ball.

    The Redmond company is now taking things a step further, working with EU publishers to ensure tech companies pay for the news they use, according to U.S. News & World Report.

    Microsoft is working with lobbying groups, such as the European Publishers Council and News Media Europe, in addition to groups representing magazine and newspaper publishers. While the EU has been working on ways to help publishers better negotiate with tech companies, it’s hardly a level playing field, with the tech companies holding the upper hand.

    Microsoft joining forces with publishers provides a considerable boost to their negotiating position, while also setting Microsoft up to benefit should Google or Facebook be unwilling to come to an agreement.

  • Facebook Faces Fallout From Australian News Ban

    Facebook Faces Fallout From Australian News Ban

    Facebook is already facing fallout from its decision to block Australian news sources, with government sites impacted and calls of bullying.

    Facebook took the unexpected step of completely blocking Australian customers from posting any news articles as a result of proposed legislation that would force the company to pay for such links. Google is similarly impacted by the legislation, but has chosen to start working out deals with news publishers.

    The social media giant is already facing backlash as a result of its decision. ABC News reports that news posts started disappearing from various government agency sites, including the Bureau of Meteorology. Facebook says that was a mistake, as government agencies should not be impacted, and has restored some pages already.

    “As the law does not provide clear guidance on the definition of news content, we have taken a broad definition in order to respect the law as drafted,” a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement.

    The same ABC News report also highlights the Australian scientific community’s concern over Facebook’s actions.

    “For Facebook to block access to the feeds of trusted science and health organisations in Australia during a pandemic and bushfire season is irresponsible and dangerous,” said Science & Technology Australia chief executive Misha Schubert.

    “At a time when the company is taking steps to tackle misinformation on its platform, it’s concerning it has chosen to silence some of this nation’s leading scientific voices.”

    Meanwhile, at least one UK lawmaker is calling the company out for being a bully and says it’s time to get tough, according to Reuters.

    “This action – this bully boy action – that they’ve undertaken in Australia will I think ignite a desire to go further amongst legislators around the world,” said Julian Knight, chair of the British Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.

    “We represent people and I’m sorry but you can’t run bulldozer over that – and if Facebook thinks it’ll do that it will face the same long-term ire as the likes of big oil and tobacco.”

    When we covered Facebook’s decision yesterday, we said: “Given the scrutiny Facebook is already under worldwide, playing hardball with the Australian government is a risky maneuver that may end up backfiring.”

    It would appear Facebook’s risky maneuver is, indeed, backfiring.

  • Facebook Plays Hardball With Australia While Google Plays Nice

    Facebook Plays Hardball With Australia While Google Plays Nice

    Facebook has escalated its disagreement with Australia over proposed legislation that would force it to pay for news.

    Australia has been pushing legislation that would force tech companies to pay for news content they link to. Traditionally, Google and Facebook have both been opposed to such a practice, with Google claiming news publishers benefit from it linking to their content. Originally, Google threatened to pull its search from the Australian market altogether, before capitulating and signing major deals with news publishers.

    Facebook on the other hand, appears to be going an entirely different route. The company has decided to restrict Australian consumers and news outlets from posting any links to news articles.

    Campbell Brown, VP Global News Partnerships, explained the company’s stand:

    Today we made an incredibly difficult decision to restrict the availability of news on Facebook in Australia. For the last three years, Facebook has worked closely with the Australian government on regulation that would help better define the relationships between technology companies and news organizations. Regulatory environments conducive to strong collaboration allow us to build innovative and sustainable ways to support journalism for the long term.

    What the proposed law introduced in Australia fails to recognize is the fundamental nature of the relationship between our platform and publishers. Contrary to what some have suggested, Facebook does not steal news content. Publishers choose to share their stories on Facebook. From finding new readers to getting new subscribers and driving revenue, news organizations wouldn’t use Facebook if it didn’t help their bottom lines. But we think we can do more and through the Facebook Journalism Project we have the right resources and team in place to bring innovation to the future of digital news.

    Given the scrutiny Facebook is already under worldwide, playing hardball with the Australian government is a risky maneuver that may end up backfiring.

  • Google Signs Multimillion-Dollar Australian News Deal

    Google Signs Multimillion-Dollar Australian News Deal

    Amid ongoing negotiations with the Australian government over proposed legislation, Google has signaled cooperation by signing a multimillion-dollar news deal.

    The Australian government is working on legislation that would force companies like Google and Facebook to pay for the news they quote and link to. Google has long been opposed to paying for news, claiming that publishers benefit from its actions far more than it does.

    The legislation has been a point of major contention, with Google threatening to pull its search out of Australia altogether if the government proceeds. That threat has opened the door for Microsoft, who has supported the legislation and tried to assure officials it could meet consumer demand in Google’s absence.

    In the latest signal Google is working to appease lawmakers, the company has inked a deal reportedly worth $30 million with Seven West Media, one of Australia’s biggest news publishers, according to Business Insider.

    Seven West Media’s content will be available via Google’s News Showcase platform, which it rolled out in Australia last week. The company is clearly trying to show the legislation is not needed, although it’s unlikely the government will abandon its efforts.

    Beyond Australia, the implications are far-reaching for Google and Facebook both. Should Australia pass the legislation, and especially if Google does not follow through on its threat to withdraw, other countries may pass similar laws. In fact, Microsoft is already pushing for the US to do exactly that.

  • Google Tries to Preempt Australian Law With Paid News Platform

    Google Tries to Preempt Australian Law With Paid News Platform

    Google is launching News Showcase in Australia, in an effort to preempt a new law that would force the company to pay for news.

    Google has been at odds with the Australian government over new regulations that would require the company to pay for the news it quotes or links to in search results. Google is notoriously opposed to paying for news, claiming that publishers benefit far more than it does when it links to their content.

    The dispute has reached the point where Google has threatened to leave the Australian market if the law is enacted. Meanwhile, Microsoft has moved to assure the Australian government that it can not only meet the increased demand caused by a Google exit but also supports the legislation.

    In its latest move, Google is rolling out its paid news platform, News Showcase, within the country in an effort to preempt the Australian government and show the proposed law is unnecessary.

    According to Reuters, News Showcase was previously only available in Germany and Brazil. While it was supposed to roll out in Australia last June, Google postponed it once the government made it apparent it was going to force the company to pay for news.

    The fact that Google is rolling it out now, with seven domestic news publishers on board, seems to be aimed at providing an alternative, more palatable option to the government’s proposal.

    “This provides an alternative to the model put forward by the Australian government,” said Derek Wilding, a professor at the University of Technology Sydney’s Centre for Media Transition.

    “What remains to be seen is if larger publishers sign on to the product,” added Wilding.

  • Microsoft Supports Australian Law Google Is Fighting

    Microsoft Supports Australian Law Google Is Fighting

    Microsoft has come out in full support of a law that could prompt Google to pull out of Australia.

    Google has been arguing against a proposed Australian law that would force the company to pay for news, something it has a long history of trying to get around. The company is so adamant that it doesn’t want to pay for news that it has threatened to pull its search engine from Australia if the law goes through.

    Microsoft clearly sees an opportunity, with CEO Satya Nadella assuring Prime Minister Scott Morrison the company is confident it could fill the gap. Microsoft isn’t stopping there, however, even going so far as to support the Australian law at the heart of the issue, according to Reuters.

    “While Microsoft is not subject to the legislation currently pending, we’d be willing to live by these rules if the government designates us,” the software giant said in a statement.

    Microsoft appears to be pushing hard to gain market share Google is on the verge of walking away from. If the company can pull it off, it may well have found a way to make up significant ground in the search engine wars.

  • Microsoft Bing Eyes Opportunity As Google Threatens Australian Exit

    Microsoft Bing Eyes Opportunity As Google Threatens Australian Exit

    As Google threatens to pull its search engine from the Australian market, Microsoft sees an opportunity, even meeting with the Australian PM.

    Google has threatened to completely pull its search engine from the Australian market in response to a proposed change that would force the search giant to pay for news content. Google has long resisted calls for it to pay for news, claiming that publishers benefit far more than it does from the search giant linking to and quoting news articles.

    Australia isn’t having it, however, and plans to force the search giant to pay for the news content it uses. Google has said it would pull out of the market if that happens, leaving the market ripe for Microsoft Bing.

    “I can tell you, Microsoft’s pretty confident, when I spoke to Satya,” Prime Minister Scott Morrison told reporters, according to Reuters.

    “We just want the rules in the digital world to be the same that exist in the real world, in the physical world,” Morrison added.

    Microsoft’s willingness to work with Australia could be a major step forward in the company’s efforts to gain more market share. Currently in distance second place in the search market, Bing could quickly gain ground if its seen as more open to working with publishers and governments.

  • Google Search May Pull Out Of Australia Over News Content

    Google Search May Pull Out Of Australia Over News Content

    Google has taken the extraordinary step of threatening to pull its search engine out of Australia if it’s forced to pay for news content.

    Google has long been at odds with news publishers. Many have tried to get the company to pay for news, but the company has made it a practice to link to and use news content without paying. Google has always claimed that news publishers benefit far more than it does from the arrangement.

    In spite of that, the company has begun caving to pressure. France has ordered Google to pay for news and the company recently set aside $1 billion to help fund partnerships with publishers.

    Google seems unwilling to give into Australia’s demands, however, according to ABC News. According to the report, Google has said it will pull its search engine if Australia moves ahead with its plans to force the company to pay.

    “If this version of the code were to become law, it would give us no real choice but to stop making Google search available in Australia,” Mel Silva, the managing director of Google Australia and New Zealand, told a Senate inquiry. “And that would be a bad outcome not only for us, but also for the Australian people, media diversity, and the small businesses who use our products every day.”

    That stance did not go over well with the government, with Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison saying “we don’t respond to threats.”

    It remains to be seen how things will eventually shake out, but it’s not looking good for Google Australia either way.

  • Huawei Willing to Meet Any Demand From Swedish Government

    Huawei Willing to Meet Any Demand From Swedish Government

    Huawei has signaled it is willing to meet any demand the Swedish government may impose to avoid being banned from the country’s 5G networks.

    Huawei is under increased pressure globally as multiple countries implement bans and restrictions on the Chinese telecoms firm. While the US originally spearheaded the campaign to isolate and restrict Huawei, claiming the company poses a national security threat, other countries have arrived at the same conclusion.

    Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Romania have banned Huawei from their networks, while the UK implemented a ban under pressure from the US. Sweden implemented a ban of their own, on both Huawei and ZTE, over the same kind of concerns the US has cited. Huawei challenged the ban in court and won a temporary reprieve, as the courts ordered the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority to delay its spectrum auction to allow more time for the matter to be resolved.

    Huawei is determined to get back in Sweden’s good graces, and is willing to do whatever it takes according to Reuters.

    “We are even willing to meet extraordinary requirements, such as setting up test facilities for our equipment in Sweden, for example, if they want to,” Kenneth Fredriksen, Huawei’s Executive Vice President, Central East Europe and Nordic Region, told Reuters.

    “We are now in the middle of the court process, but we are willing to have pragmatic discussions.”

    It remains to be seen if Huawei’s overtures will be successful, especially since Sweden’s ban was based on analysis by the country’s military and security experts.

  • Tasmania Joins Exclusive Club: Runs On 100% Renewable Energy

    Tasmania Joins Exclusive Club: Runs On 100% Renewable Energy

    The Tasmanian government has announced it has made the transition to 100% renewable electricity.

    Guy Barnett, Minister for Energy, issued a statement heralding the milestone achievement for the Australian state:

    Every Tasmanian should be proud that our State is the first in Australia and one of only a handful of jurisdictions in the world to achieve this target, delivering on a key Liberal Government commitment from the 2018 election.

    We have reached 100 per cent thanks to our commitment to realising Tasmania’s renewable energy potential through our nation-leading energy policies and making Tasmania attractive for industry investment, which in turn is creating jobs across the State, particularly in our regions.

    Barnett says the state plans to double its renewable energy generation by 2040, and says the state’s renewable energy projects will help it rebuild its economy post-pandemic.

  • UK and Australia Open Joint Investigation Into Clearview AI

    UK and Australia Open Joint Investigation Into Clearview AI

    The UK and Australia have announced a joint investigation into Clearview AI—to cheers of privacy advocates the world over.

    Clearview quickly made a name for itself as a facial recognition firm that had scraped billions of images from millions of websites. Ignoring platform policies and user agreements, Clearview even scraped images from the top social media companies, including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

    Things only got worse from there, as the company was found to be monitoring police searches to discourage them from talking to journalists. Despite repeatedly insisting it only sold its software to law enforcement and security personnel, information came to light showing the company had allowed investors and friends to access and use the platform as their own plaything. To top it off, Clearview began selling its software to authoritarian regimes.

    It seems the UK and Australia have had enough, as “the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) have opened a joint investigation into the personal information handling practices of Clearview AI Inc., focusing on the company’s use of ‘scraped’ data and biometrics of individuals.”

    This is further bad news for the company, but great news for the average consumer and privacy advocate alike.

  • UK/Huawei Showdown Heats Up

    UK/Huawei Showdown Heats Up

    The ongoing showdown over the UK’s decision to revisit Huawei’s role in the country’s 5G network is heating up.

    In contrast to the US, Australia and New Zealand, the UK is the only one of the so-called “Five Eyes” alliance of countries that formally decided to include Huawei in its 5G network plans, albeit in a limited role. Meanwhile, the fifth member of the Five Eyes, Canada, is still undecided.

    Ultimately, however, multiple factors have forced the UK to revisit its initial decision. US officials have warned that involving Huawei in its network would force the US to reconsider its military and intelligence assets within the UK. On top of that, the US has taken measures to limit Huawei’s access to the semiconductor chips it needs for its equipment, further endangering the UK’s plans.

    Now that the UK is officially reviewing the decision, parties on both sides are mounting increasing pressure. According to CNBC, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has come out in favor of the UK’s security review, telling BBC radio “I trust that the U.K. government will design their networks in ways that protect the networks and make sure that the U.K. has secure 5G networks.”

    On the flip side, Huawei is pulling out the stops to win over public opinion. According to the BBC, the Chinese company is engaging in a newspaper and internet media blitz to remind the British public that it has been in business in the UK for some 20 years.

    Ultimately, there will be winners and losers regardless of what the UK decides. If it continues with its plans to include Huawei, it risks its “special relationship” with the US. If, on the other hand, it bans Huawei as the US has done, it risks alienating one of its biggest trading partners.

  • US Assets Could Be Pulled From UK Over Huawei Deal

    US Assets Could Be Pulled From UK Over Huawei Deal

    The US is reviewing its military and intelligence assets in the UK and may pull them out following the UK’s decision to use Huawei.

    The US has banned Huawei and engaged in a campaign to pressure its allies to do the same, especially those allies that, along with the US, constitute the Five Eyes. Comprised of the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US, the Five Eyes work closely on the international scene and share intelligence. The UK, in particular, shares a very close relationship with the US, a relationship that has been strained with the UK’s decision to include Huawei in its 5G network.

    According to The Telegraph, the UK’s decision may soon result in action on the part of the US. The Telegraph says that half a dozen sources have confirmed that a review is underway to determine what military and intelligence assets in the UK may need to be pulled out.

    “This was not a bluff. You cannot mitigate the danger Boris Johnson is exposing the UK to by letting Huawei into the network,” said one of the sources.

    “This review is not a punishment. This is the White House saying ‘okay, if they’re going to go down this path and put themselves at risk then how do we protect ourselves.’”

    The coming weeks and months will no doubt be pivotal, in terms of the US and UK’s relationship. It’s also possible that such a review could put more pressure on Johnson to reverse the decision, something many in the British government already want to do.

  • Australia Taking Facebook to Court Over Privacy

    Australia Taking Facebook to Court Over Privacy

    The Australian Information Commissioner has launched legal proceedings against Facebook, accusing the company of repeated breaches of privacy law.

    Facebook allegedly used the personal information of 311,127 Australians, collected through the app This is Your Digital Life, for purposes other than advertised, including disclosing it for political profiling.

    “We consider the design of the Facebook platform meant that users were unable to exercise reasonable choice and control about how their personal information was disclosed,” said Australian Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner Angelene Falk in a statement.

    “Facebook’s default settings facilitated the disclosure of personal information, including sensitive information, at the expense of privacy.

    “We claim these actions left the personal data of around 311,127 Australian Facebook users exposed to be sold and used for purposes including political profiling, well outside users’ expectations.”

    If the lawsuit is successful, the court could impose a penalty of A$1,700,000 ($1.1 million) per instance. Should Facebook face the maximum penalty for all 311,127 instances, the total fine would be A$529 billion.

  • Canada Undecided On Huawei, Will Not ‘Get Bullied’

    Canada Undecided On Huawei, Will Not ‘Get Bullied’

    Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, Navdeep Bains, has said the country will not be pressured into make a decision on Huawei.

    Canada is part of the Five Eyes group of countries that work closely on intelligence. Of the group, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand have banned Huawei from their 5G networks, while the UK has opted to include the Chinese firm in a limited role. Canada has yet to decide, but is warning the country must do what is best for itself.

    According to Bloomberg, Bains told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. “We will make sure that we proceed in a manner that’s in our national interest. We won’t get bullied by any other jurisdictions.”

    “Countries have raised their concerns. We’re engaged with our Five Eyes partners. We know that this is a very important issue,” he added. “But we will make a decision that makes sense for Canadians and protects Canadians.”

    The U.S. has been pressuring its allies, both in the Five Eyes and EU, to ban Huawei. It’s safe to say the U.S. certainly wants to win over its closest ally geographically but, based on Bains’ remarks, that may be easier said than done.

  • 5G Safety Concerns Overblown According to Australian Telcos

    5G Safety Concerns Overblown According to Australian Telcos

    ZDNet is reporting that Australia’s two largest telcos, Optus and Telstra, are downplaying the danger of 5G, indicating it is generally safer than common household items.

    Australia has an electromagnetic energy (EME) safety limit that devices must fall under in order to be used. Household items are usually far below that limit, with microwaves coming in 100 times below the maximum. Responding to concerned citizens and various groups, Australia’s House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications and the Arts launched an inquiry into 5G deployment.

    The two telco giants have cooperated with the inquiry, attempting to ease the committee’s concerns about the new technology.

    “EME in the home from mobile networks is typically below those emitted by standard household devices such as a microwave oven or baby monitor,” Optus wrote in a statement to the committee.

    “Some of these concerns are being fuelled by false and alarmist claims from unreliable sources. Both industry and government need to work harder to counter any misinformation and ensure that the community is armed with the facts to enable it to embrace the technology that will bring so many benefits to people’s lives.”

    In testimony before the committee, Telstra principal of 5G EME strategy Mike Wood echoed those sentiments:

    “Leading up to the public launch of 5G with the 3.5GHz network…. What we found again was that they were getting a much faster response time, because the network was quicker and you could deliver the signal quicker. That meant that the signal was lower and the EME levels were lower — in fact, they were very similar to 3G, 4G and WiFi.

    “What we find is that because 5G’s very efficient, it typically runs at a lower level than an everyday device in your house like a baby monitor or a microwave oven.

    “When we’ve done our tests on our 5G network, they’re typically 1,000 to 10,000 times less than what we get from other devices. So when you add all of that up together, it’s all very low in terms of total emission. But you’re finding that 5G is in fact a lot lower than many other devices we use in our everyday lives.”

    If the two companies’ findings are correct, they should go a long way toward easing people’s minds. One of the biggest challenges to 5G deployment has been the belief that it would expose people to far more radiation and EME than earlier wireless technology.

    One such example is Switzerland, where a number of the cantons have called for a halt on 5G deployment until further studies can be done, in what has been one of the biggest backlashes to the fledgling technology.

    While further studies—especially independent studies by non-telco entities—will need to be done, it’s still reassuring that both Optus and Telstra found no basis for concern.