Natalie Kenly and Bree Olson were Charlie Sheen’s former “goddesses.” Now those goddesses share conflicting memories of life with now HIV-positive actor.
Bree Olson slammed Charlie Sheen earlier this week while a guest on Howard Stern’s radio show. Natalie Kenly, however, is standing behind the former Two and a Half Men star, claiming Sheen didn’t silence her with money.
Charlie Sheen's other "goddess" Natalie Kenly defends him against Bree Olson: https://t.co/568p2V7GxO pic.twitter.com/Vhy2qhJc0I
— Us Weekly (@usweekly) November 20, 2015
“The industry that Bree is in, this is devastating to her career,” Kenly, who is now a mother, says. “I think that’s why she’s so angry.”
“I can definitely say that my recollections at the time are greatly different that the ones that she has mentioned,” she adds. “I knew Charlie as the man, and not the myth or the legend. Charlie didn’t pay me to keep quiet about his HIV diagnosis or anything else. I was tested. I’ve been tested several times since then, and I also don’t believe I was around when he was diagnosed or contracted the virus.”
Natalie Kenly isn’t the only person angry about Bree Olson’s recent claims. Charlie Sheen’s rep, Mark Burg recently told People magazine that Sheen wasn’t infected during the time he spent with both Bree Olson and Natalie Kenly.
'Charlie did not pay me': Ex-Sheen ‘goddess’ defends actor against @BreeOlson accusations https://t.co/sdrZCb29Wy pic.twitter.com/lXtSCCsWxd
— New York Daily News (@NYDailyNews) November 20, 2015
“Bree Olson is all over Howard Stern but the truth is she wasn’t in Charlie’s life when he was HIV-positive and so there was no reason to tell her anything,” Burg said.
Why do you suppose Natalie Kenly and Bree Olson are telling such different stories about their time with Charlie Sheen?
Which one do you think is telling the truth?