WebProNews

Tag: Web Browsers

  • Latest Firefox Beta Available for Testing

    Latest Firefox Beta Available for Testing

    Mozilla announced today that the next major version of Firefox is ready for testing. That would be Firefox 4 beta, and Mozilla says it includes faster start-up time and bookmarking, and that it caters to smoother complex animations. 

    "Firefox 4 Beta is built for the way people use the Web today, offering more control over the browsing experience," the Mozilla team says. "It introduces a fresh new look and features like App Tabs and Panorama to make it easier and more efficient to navigate the Web. Firefox 4 Beta also includes performance enhancements to make everything faster from start-up time to page-load speed and the performance of Web applications and games. Firefox Sync is integrated into the browser with Firefox 4 Beta, giving you access to your Awesome Bar history, bookmarks, open tabs and passwords across computers and smartphones."

    "Firefox 4 Beta also enables developers to create fun Web apps and websites," the team adds. "With full support for HTML5 features in Firefox 4 Beta, developers can create new ways for people to enjoy the Web. This includes WebM and HD video, 3D graphic rendering with WebGL, hardware acceleration and the Mozilla Audio API to help create visual experiences for sound. Director of Product Platform Management Chris Blizzard has a full overview of all developer tools in Firefox 4 Beta."

    Firefox 4

    The beta can be downloaded here. It will be updated every few weeks so new features can be tested. If you’re having problems with your add-ons and the beta, there is an add-on compatibility reporter you can use to test them. 

    The beta is available in over 50 languages, with more to come. While the beta is "feature complete", Mozilla says it will still look for ways to improve upon it for the Firefox 4 final release. 

  • Google Drops Support of Popular Video Codec from Chrome [Update]

    Update: Google has a new post up talking about the move more, and answering some frequently asked questions. 

    Original Article: Google announced that it will no longer support popular video codec H.264 for the HTML5 <video tag> with its Chrome browse. The move has raised some eyebrows. Google basically says it’s about openness and that by removing support for the codec, it will enable innovation. Here’s what Google said

    We expect even more rapid innovation in the web media platform in the coming year and are focusing our investments in those technologies that are developed and licensed based on open web principles. To that end, we are changing Chrome’s HTML5 <video> support to make it consistent with the codecs already supported by the open Chromium project. Specifically, we are supporting the WebM (VP8) and Theora video codecs, and will consider adding support for other high-quality open codecs in the future. Though H.264 plays an important role in video, as our goal is to enable open innovation, support for the codec will be removed and our resources directed towards completely open codec technologies.

    Chrome Dropping CodecComments on the announcement on Google’s Chromium blog include:

    "Whoah, ballsy move Google. Ballsy move. I like it."

    "No…No more codecs!"

    "Thumbs up, Google."

    "Wow, this is the worst thing to happen to web standards I’ve seen in a long time. This just reinforces the notion that Google doesn’t care about users."

    As you can see, opinions vary, which is probably why discussion about it is all over Techmeme at the moment. 

    Joe Mullen at PaidContent says, "Google has essentially declared war against the web’s dominant video format…"

    MG Siegler at TechCrunch writes, "The problem is that Google’s stated stance is now that they’re all about enabling ‘open innovation’ by removing non-open technologies like H.264…But you can’t be hypocritical, Google. Remove Flash too if that’s your real stance….Of course, it’s much more complicated than that. One of the big backers of H.264 is Google’s ever-growing rival, Apple. More specifically, the technology is front and center to much of what iOS has to offer. iOS, which is the main rival to Google’s Android platform."

    Google says the changes will occur in the next couple months, but that they wanted to get the announcement out there so content providers can prepare.  

    It’s worth noting that Firefox doesn’t support H.264 either. This Wikipedia entry has a pretty helpful chart of which browsers support what.

  • Chrome Beta Gets Google Instant, WebGL 3D Tech (And More)

    Google recently held a Chrome event in which it showed off some new things they are doing with their popular web browser (not to mention the opening of the Chrome Web Store and the introduction of Chrome OS). 

    Now, some of the things Google showed off are available in a beta release of the browser. For one, you can turn on Chrome Instant (Google Instant for Chrome’s Omnibox). If turned on, web pages you frequently visit will begin to load as soon as you start typing. Search results and "in-line predictions" will also instantly appear.

    Google is also bringing Chrome’s existing "sandboxing" technology for web pages to the Flash Player Chrome plug-in (on Windows). 

    "The sandbox adds an additional layer of protection to further guard against malicious pages that try to hijack your computer or steal private information from your hard drive," explains Chrome software engineer Carlos Pizano. "Based on this groundwork in the beta, we’ll be bringing the sandboxed Flash Player to Chrome for Mac and Linux in future releases as well."

    The beta also includes WebGL, a new technology for 3D graphics the company showed off at the event. "WebGL is a 3D graphics API for JavaScript that developers can use to create fully 3D web apps," explains software engineer Kenneth Russell. "It is based on the OpenGL ES 2.0 API, which should be familiar to many 3D graphics developers. Google, Mozilla, Apple, Opera and graphics hardware vendors have been working together to standardize WebGL for over a year now, and since the spec is just about final at this point, we wanted to get our implementation out there for feedback."

    One application that utilizes WebGL is the "Body Browser," which Google highlighted at the event. This is actually now available as a Google Labs experiment (it was built by a Googler in their "20% time"). 

    There is a gallery available where you can look at available Chrome experiments for WebGL.

  • Google Instant Coming to Chrome

    At a special event for Chrome today, Google announced that its browser is up to 120 million users, representing 300% growth since January of this year. 

    Chrome Experiences 300% Growth This Year

    In addition to that, the company announced Google Instant for the Chrome omnibox. You can type a single letter, and it will load an actual site in the browser – not just search results like what we’ve seen from Google Instant thus far. Chrome knows the sites that you go to often and adapts the functionality to this. 

    If you go to ESPN.com a lot, you can simply type "E" in the omnibox and it will automatically bring up the site. You can type "T" and get to Twitter, "C" and get to CNN, etc.  It looks like it still shows search results when what you type doesn’t match a site you go to often. 

    Google Instant on Omnibox

    "The most important thing is that it’s all going to be really, really fast," said Google’s Brian Rakowski describing many of the ways Chrome continues to get faster, including loading PDFs, and handling graphic content.

    It’s unclear at this point when exactly Google Instant for the Omnibox will be available to everybody, but we’ll let you know when we know. 

    The company is also expected to announce the launch of the long-awaited Chrome OS at the event. Stay tuned.

     

  • Speed: Recommended for Content, Conversions and Holiday Traffic

    It’s become clear that site speed and performance have become increasingly important on the web, particularly with Google. The company has made a plethora of announcements over the past year or two directly related to making the web faster in general. Most recently, for example, Google announced mod_pagespeed, a tool for webmasters to use to automatically optimize their sties. "It’s like Page Speed, but makes the changes automatically," Google told WebProNews. But that’s only part of a broader initiative. 

    You can work on speeding up your site for Google, and that’s a good idea, but really having a faster site is ideal for users and may even keep you from losing conversions in the long run. We had a conversation with Joshua Bixby, President of site acceleration solutions provider Strangeloop. He also maintains the blog Web Performance Today. We asked him how important speed is to a site when there’s good content. 

    Is Speed As Important As Content?

    "There’s an excellent quote from Fred Wilson, principal of the VC firm Union Square Ventures," Bixby tells us. "He said ‘Speed is more than a feature. Speed is the most important feature.’ If your website or application is slow, people won’t use it – it’s that simple. Study after study has confirmed this. Companies like Amazon, Yahoo, Google, Shopzilla, Microsoft and AOL have proven time after time that when they make their sites faster, they get more page views, more conversions, more revenue, happier visitors. When they make their sites slower, even by just a couple of seconds, they see immediate negative results across the board. What’s even worse: even after they speed their site up again, the negative word of mouth takes months to shake off."

    "Having good content is your bedrock," he adds. "You need it. But if you can’t deliver it quickly to the people who want it, you’re doing your content a huge disservice."

    The Mobile Situation

    With mobile becoming a much greater part of consumers’ everyday browsing habits, this would appear to pose a problem, because let’s face it. Mobile is slow. 

    "The mobile world is like the web was 10 years ago, when site speed barely registered as a critical usability element," says Bixby. "It’s taken until now for speed to get the spotlight. I see mobile following a similar path, but the timeframe will be seriously compressed (i.e. 10 years of progress will take place in about two years)."

    "We tend to improve speed on things we can measure, so the first important step will be measuring and benchmarking mobile web performance across industries," he continues. "We are already seeing some movement on measurement, but this remains difficult for a couple of reasons:

    – Not enough companies have a true mobile web presence. Instead, they’re serving the desktop version of their site to mobile browsers. According to a recent Forrester report, 57% of companies surveyed either don’t have a mobile strategy or are just beginning to work on one.

    – With dozens of mobile browsers in use, each with its own preference for rendering mobile sites, it is incredibly difficult to find a ‘one size fits all’ performance test."

    "When there are a significant number of mobile sites, and when there have been some compelling mobile performance studies, we’ll see the business and development communities rise up and start taking mobile performance seriously," Bixby adds. "In conjunction with that, we will see the transformation vendors start coming out with specific mobile features."

    HTML5 and the Browsers

    Josh Bixby of Strangeloop talks web performance and site speed Much has been made about HTML5’s impact on the web, and it’s becoming a focus of modern web browsers. What impact will it have on overall speed and performance? Maybe not as big of one as people would like in the near-term, but that doesn’t mean it’s not significant. 

    "In terms of overall web page speed, HTML5 will have minimal impact in the immediate future, but far-reaching impact down the road," suggests Bixby. "HTML5 has been touted as a kind of Holy Grail that will save the web by introducing a universal standard that will solve everything from poorly performing proprietary plugins to clunky web apps. The actual truth is much more nuanced than this."

    "Divested of all the hype, HTML5 is a markup language," explains Bixby. "As with any markup language, HTML5’s adoption is dependent on how browser developers and web developers choose to implement it. Right now, there’s a serious disconnect between these two development worlds."

    "For example, Internet Explorer 9 is probably the most HTML5-compliant browser available today, but in a recent Strangeloop study of the top 200 Alexa-ranked retail sites, we found that sites performed no more quickly – and in many cases performed more slowly – in IE9 than they did in IE8," he continues. "We concluded that this is because IE9 is aimed at HTML5 acceleration, but most of the sites we tested do not exploit HTML5’s potential."

    "From a web perspective, HTML5 has significant impact, but this will be an evolution rather than a revolution," says Bixby. "As sites evolve to take advantage of the benefits of HTML5, we’ll start to feel its impact across the web."

    Don’t Lose Holiday Sales Because of Site Performance

    Site performance in general becomes particularly important to e-commerce sites around the holiday season, because this is when sales can really flow in (our out). Black Friday isn’t too far off (not to mention cyber Monday), and as businesses give attractive deals to customers, they’re going to get a ton of traffic. "The impact is always the same: horror stories of outages, down time, lost revenue, etc. This is the day e-tailers dread," Bixby says. "But this year we are seeing a number of forward-thinking retailers start preparing, not just in terms of adding more servers, but also embracing site transformation and we are very excited about how they will fare."

    "It would be really interesting to see a post-holiday breakdown of which e-tailers suffered and which ones triumphed, and then correlate that with those who took an aggressive approach to site optimization," he adds. 

    As far as where we’re headed in the next year or so, Bixby also shared some interesting predictions about browsers, mobile, and performance in general. He thinks Chrome will become the #2 browser in 2011. "IE is here to stay, in terms of worldwide share, but Chrome will soon overtake Firefox and split share with IE. I see a world where Microsoft and Google share the majority of world’s eyeballs, with Safari in third place." He also says Android will become the #1 mobile platform. 

    "Mobile web performance will become as important as desktop web performance," he says. "People will stop focusing on when a web page fully loads as an indicator of site performance, and instead start focusing on when a page starts loading and being useful to visitors."

    "Major initiatives like Google SPDY will start changing the way the internet works at its foundation."

    There’s no question that Google has largely been leading the charge in trying to speed up the web. The question is whether or not it will work. Google and other organizations can do everything they can, but in the grand scheme of things, it’s going to take webmaster cooperation around the Internet. That’s easier said than done.

  • Is This the Web Browser Experience People Want?

    Today, nearly everybody in the tech community is talking about a new web browser called RockMelt, just introduced over the weekend. The browser promises to make it "easy for you to do the things you do every single day on the web."

    This means sharing, keeping up with friends, staying up to date on news and information, and of course search. The browser is built on Chromium, the open source project behind Google’s Chrome.

    "Your friends are important to you, so we built them in," writes the RockMelt Team. "Now you’re able to chat, share that piano-playing-cat video everyone’s going to love, or just see what your friends are up to, regardless of what site you’re on. Your favorite sites are important to you, so we built them in too. Now you can access them from anywhere, without leaving the page you’re on. And RockMelt will tell you when something new happens."

    "Share or tweet links often?" the team continues. "Yeah, us too. No more wading through each site’s goofy share widget or copy-pasting URLs. We built sharing directly into the browser, right next to the URL bar. Like a site or story? Click “Share” and BAM – link shared. You can use it on any site to post to Facebook or tweet about it on Twitter. It’s  just one click away. That easy."

    RockMelt isn’t the first browser to place this kind of emphasis on social and sharing. This is the whole angle of Flock, which has been around for quite some time. In fact, back in the summer, Flock announced a redesign of its browser, which was originally based on Firefox, to a new Chromium-based version. 

    Right now, people can sign up for early access to RockMelt, but while it’s been two years in the making, the team says to expect some bugs because the browser is still a "baby". 

    While it’s hard to say if RockMelt will find mainstream adoption in an increasingly crowded web browser space with continuous enhancements among offerings from the big names like Google, Microsoft, and Apple and other established browsers like Firefox and Opera, the concepts behind RockMelt will be attractive to web users. 

    I’d expect to see more of these kinds of functionalities from the other existing browsers, particularly Chrome, given that not only is it also built on Chromium, but Google has said repeatedly that it will continue to build "social layers" upon its existing products. The browser seems like an obvious place to build such a layer. 

    There are plenty of add-ons out there for other browsers that can add these kinds of features, but RockMelt appears to just be reducing the friction between users and this kind of web experience.  

    Content providers should only benefit from the kinds of sharing features RockMelt promises. Regardless of what sharing buttons or widgets they offer on their own content, users will always have the option to share with their own networks of friends right at their fingertips. 

    Marc Andreessen, who started Netscape, is backing RockMelt, which was developed by Tim Howes and Eric Vishria.

  • Chrome Gets a New Stable Version (No Instant Yet)

    Google, in keeping with its strategy of releasing a new stable version of its Chrome browser every six weeks, has released a new one today. 

    "In this stable release, we’ve focused primarily on hundreds of bug fixes," says Product Manager Jeff Chang. "We’ve also included a few other things that may be of interest to developers, such as full AppleScript support on Mac OS X for UI automation and implementation of the HTML5 parsing algorithm, the File API, and directory upload (via <input type="file" directory>). Also, if you choose to block sites from setting any data in your browser’s content settings for cookies, you can now use a new dialog for managing blocked cookies in bulk."

    Google has a list of bug fixes for Chrome here

    Earlier this month, Statcounter released information (visualized by Pingdom) indicating that Chrome has tripled its market share in the browser space since last year. 

    That stands to increase significantly as Google TV purchases start happening, though the Chrome experience is somewhat limited on Google TV, based on my experience with the interface on Sony’s model at BlogWorld. There was no Chrome extension functionality, for example. That’s a huge selling point of the browser. Still, it’s the default browser on the platform. 

    We’re still waiting for Google Instant to make its way to the a stable version of Chrome. Perhaps in another six weeks. 

  • Google Instant from the Browser

    Google Instant from the Browser

    Upon the announcement of Google Instant, the company said that they would be rolling out the feature to mobile and browsers (search boxes and Chrome Omnibox) in the next few months. We asked Google how it would work with the browser, and they told us, "It’s premature for us to get into details about future implementations."

    We can now see how it works, thanks to a beta developer release, which allows you to enable it. "Just launch your beta/dev/canary release, type about:labs, enable Instant, restart Chrome, and prepare for some interesting browsing," writes Adam Pash at Lifehacker, who provides the following clip, displaying Google Instant functionality from the browser. 

    It seems to work pretty much how we envisioned it, except it appears to bring up sites from your search history, as well as Google search results, as opposed to search results only. 

    This week, Google also added Google Instant functionality to more of its search options in the left panel, such as: videos, news, books, blogs, updates, and discussions (no images for some reason).  

  • Smartphone Users Now Account for Most Mobile Browser and App Users

    New data from comScore indicates that smartphone users now make up the majority of mobile browser and app users, at least in the United States. 

    The firm finds that the number of Smartphone users accessing mobile content through browsers and apps now surpasses that of non-smartphone users, claiming that in the 3 month average ending in August, Smartphone subscribers made up 60% of those who used a downloaded app and 55% of those who used a browser. 

    According to comScore, 75.6 million subscribers 13 and older downloaded apps in August. Smartphone users represented 60.6%, up from 43.6% the previous year.  80.8 million mobile subscribers used their browser, with smartphone subscribers comprising 55.5%, up from 41.4 % last year.

    Smartphone vs Nonsmartphone usage

    "That Smartphone owners now represent the majority of the U.S. mobile audience accessing downloaded applications and browsers represents a watershed moment in the industry,” said comScore SVP of mobile, Mark Donovan. "Although Smartphones still make up less than a quarter of the U.S. mobile market, they are generating the lion’s share of mobile content consumption. With Smartphones’ share of the pie destined to get greater over time, marketers and content providers should begin to shift their focus towards developing with primarily these devices in mind."

    The firm also revealed some interesting stats about demographic. For example, males accounted for 56% of smarphone subscribers, with females accounting for 44% (naturally). 29.2% were between the ages of 25 and 34 (the largest age demographic). 

  • Google Instant in the Browser Means Google Results ALL the Time

    When Google launched Google Instant last week, the company said it would come to mobile and the browser (search boxes and the Chrome Omni box) within the next few months. WebProNews asked Google about how the feature would translate to the browser.

    Specifically, we wondered if using the feature directly from the browser would automatically take over the entire page the user is currently on, with Google results. If the following clip from the German GoogleWatch Blog is any indication, than that is pretty much exactly what it will do.

    The video comes from Google Instant in Chrome Labs in Chromium (the open source browser Chrome is based on). Google Instant has been activated in this capacity as pointed out by MG Siegler at TechCrunch. He says that "most features that come to Chromium, usually find their way to Chrome in relatively short order — though they have to then travel through the different levels of Chrome itself (dev then beta then stable)."

    If this is indicative of how Google Instant will work from the browser in general, it’s going to be interesting to see the reactions. If a user wants to just go to a URL, they would theoretically be presented with Google results for that site before they even finish typing, and might be inclined to go through Google to get to the site. 

    "It’s premature for us to get into details about future implementations," Google’s Jake Hubert told us when we asked how the feature would work.

    Google Instant in Chrome Labs in Chromium is only available for Windows for now.

  • WordPress Reveals IE9 Pinning Features

    WordPress Reveals IE9 Pinning Features

    Internet Explorer 9 (beta) was launched to the public this week, and it’s gotten a lot of buzz and high marks. It’s also gotten a lot of web properties doing things to utilize its features. Microsoft’s own Bing features are certainly interesting. 

    WordPress is utilizing the browser’s functionality for both bloggers and blog readers, so its new features should have pretty far reaching impact, within the space of IE9 users. 

    WordPress is taking advantage of the pinning feature of the browser, specifically, with different feature sets for readers and bloggers. Joy Victory explains on the WordPress Blog:

    When you sign in to your blog, you can pin your own site and get extra tasks that make blogging easier and faster. A logged-in user can quickly access links to their dashboard to write a new post, moderate comments, upload a new file, or view blog statistics. (Each task only appears if the user has that task’s capability, such as site administrator’s.) A custom list also displays up to 5 latest posts for the current blog context.

    You can pin someone else’s blog, too. When you do, an icon appears that lets you subscribe to the blog feed, signup for a free blog, read Freshly Pressed, and access WordPress.com Support and forums.

    Pinning features on IE9

    To take advantage of the WordPress pinning capabilities, users simply need to drag the tab onto the taskbar. It will either display as a large WordPress logo or  if you’re a blogger, your "Blavatar" if you’ve uploaded one.

  • IE9 Now Available for Download

    IE9 Now Available for Download

    Microsoft announced that Internet Explorer 9 is now available for download. It’s already getting some pretty positive buzz, particularly for an Internet Explorer release.

    Ed Bott at ZDNet calls it "the most ambitious browser release Microsoft has ever undertaken". Pretty strong words. 

    The download even has its own special domain at BeautyoftheWeb.com

    So what does IE9 do that is so great? 

    It’s faster than IE8 and Firefox, but slower than Safari, Opera, and Chrome by some reports. It has a new system of warning about malicious downloads, and it give you warnings about when your add-ons are slowing down your performance. I could see this feature being either helpful or annoying. 

    Microsoft’s whole angle for the browser is that its "putting sites at the center of the browsing experience", and it uses more of the computer to try and accomplish this. "Before IE9, browsers used perhaps 10% of the PC’s capability," says Microsoft’s Dean Hachamovitch. "IE9 has shown the clear performance benefits with full hardware-acceleration of webpages. Our approach in designing a site-centric web browsing experience also involves using everything available around the browser. We see all the pixels and code that people need for a significantly better browsing experience already there on the screen."

    What IE9 Looks Like

    Users can pin sites to the Windows 7 taskbar, like they would do with applications, creating a shortcut. What’s interesting about this is that sites can actually program "jump lists" for pinned sites, to make common tasks easier for users. They can program notifications when the user pins them in the task bar. How many sites actually take advantage of this remains to be seen. 

    The thinking appears to be along the lines of replacing the browser with OS, almost the opposite of Google’s Chrome OS, which is more about replacing the OS with the browser. Interestingly enough, they both represent the continued merging of the two interfaces. 

    IE9 also uses Aero snap functionality, which will be familiar to regular users of Windows 7. Users can snap to browser windows side by side for convenient double browsing. Tabs are draggable, in or outside of the current window (much like Chrome), and can be snapped. The address bar, called "the one box" is also fairly Chrome-like in that it also serves as a search feature. 

    "The browser supports HTML5 and ‘other modern standards’," says Hachamovitch. "The people who build the web have better ideas for their customers than browsers have been able to deliver to date. With IE9 this situation starts to change. Websites can offer richer experiences because of fully hardware accelerated HTML5. Those richer experiences now blend comfortably and consistently into the consumer’s desktop experiences. The focus should be on the site, not on browsing and browsers."

    You must have Windows 7 or Vista with SP2. It is not compatible with XP.

  • Firefox Panorama Search in the Making

    Microsoft isn’t the only one doing interesting things with its browser. Mozilla’s Aza Raskin has an interesting proof-of-concept video for searching on Firefox Panorama. 

    In July, Raskin revealed "Tab Candy", a Firefox feature designed to make managing tabs easier. It shows an overview of all tabs so they can be quickly located. It also includes other organizational features like tab groups. The feature was later renamed "Panorama".  More on this here.
    "Firefox Panorama (née Tab Candy) gives the best way to browse through your tabs and groups, but is lacking in search," says Raskin. "We are working on fixing that. Search is a feature where speed is the number one priority, so we’ve worked to have the visual aspects of search be lightening fast (almost no animation) and the entry method be instant (just start typing)."
    Here is the video:

    Firefox Panorama Search: Proof Of Concept from Aza Raskin on Vimeo.

     When the Panorama Search feature actually becomes available to use in Firefox still remains to be seen, but it should make for an interesting feature, and possibly boost productivity, which is what Panorama itself is all about.
  • Bing Takes Advantage of IE9’s Capabilities

    As you probably know, Microsoft launched the Internet Explorer 9 (beta) publicly today. It can be downloaded here

    The company also took the opportunity to show off some new enhancements to Bing, to accompany its new browser. Taking advantage of the HTML5 capabilities of IE9, they’ve added some nice new features that are exclusive to Bing use in that particular browser (at least initially). 

    The coolest of the new features, while having little to do with search, is what Bing has done with its homepage. It uses HTML5 to replace the homepage image with a homepage video or an image that you can zoom in and out of. You can see this in action (along with the other new feature) in the following video.

    Bing Gets New IE9-Specific Features

    Other features are more related to search. These include:

    – Smooth transitions from one screen to the next, as you search

    – Previews of images, videos and text are bigger and bolder

    – Bing has an IE9 "jump list", which lets users search various Bing categories like travel or shopping right from the Windows 7 taskbar. 

    – New smooth scrolling that keeps a search box in place and related searches at the side, in case you need to refine as you scroll. 

    – Quick Tabs and Visual Search transitions in a new app-like experience

    The new Bing features for IE9 will be available in preview format for users of IE9 soon. No exact time table was given, but there will be a preview site that users will be able to play around with later this month.

    Are the new Internet Explorer features enough to get you to use Bing? Are the new Bing features enough to get you to use the new Internet Explorer? Are you using both? Neither? Share your thoughts.

  • Google Talks Instant’s Effect on Web History

    As noted in an earlier article, Google Instant may log SERPs for unfinished queries in your browser’s history, if you pause for long enough, before completing your query. WebProNews asked Google about this. 
     
    "For signed-in users with Web History enabled searching on the Google.com homepage or results page, we continue to show all the searches they perform," Google’s Jake Hubert tells us. "With Google Instant, this includes searches when the user pauses for three or more seconds and/or clicks on a search result. These queries are explicitly marked to indicate results were shown for three seconds but had no click."
     
    Maureen O’Connor at Valleywag writes, "The new Google Instant guesses what you’re searching for while you’re typing, and retrieves results before you finish. It’s the T-9 of search engines. And it means buying an "erector set" will make everyone think you have ‘erectile dysfunction.’" If everyone means anybody looking at your web history, she might be right. 
     

    Upon the announcement of Google Instant, the company said that they would be rolling out the feature to mobile and browsers (search boxes and Chrome address bar) in the next few months. I have been wondering exactly how this will work.  

    Will using this feature automatically take over a page the user is currently on with Google results? With the chrome address bar specifically, what if a user just wants to go to a site and not Google? Will they be presented with results before they even have a chance to complete the typing of a URL?
     
    "It’s premature for us to get into details about future implementations," Hubert says. 
     
    That’s fair, but this will be an interesting element of Google Instant to keep an eye on. If it turns out to do that, some webmasters may take issue.
  • Google Adds Analytics Support to Chrome Extensions

    If you have a Google Chrome extension, this news might interest you greatly. Google announced today that it has added support for Google Analytics to the Chrome Extension Gallery

    The move, Google says, will "help you better understand how many people visit your extension pages, where they’re coming from and more."

    Users can specify a Google Analytics profile for each extension. This will start tracking the extension’s page in GA like it was its own site.

    Google Analytics support from Chrome extensions

    "You can also use Google Analytics to track the usage of your extension once it’s installed," says Google software engineer Qian Huang. "Check out this tutorial that explains how to integrate Google Analytics such that you can analyze how users interact with the features of your extensions."

    Browser extensions can be a good way to keep customers engaged with your business, and being able to track that will no doubt help tremendously. 

  • Mozilla Follows Google Into Gaming

    Mozilla Follows Google Into Gaming

    Mozilla announced that Mozilla Labs is undertaking a new intiative with gaming. The effort will be focused primarily on games built, delivered, and played on the Open Web and in the browser. 

    "We want to explore the wider set of technologies which make immersive gaming on the Open Web possible," says Pascal Finette at Mozilla Labs. "We invite the wider community to play with cool, new tech and aim to help establish the Open Web as the platform for gaming across all your Internet connected devices."

    "Modern Open Web technologies introduced a complete stack of technologies such as Open Video, audio, WebGL, touch events, device orientation, geo location, and fast JavaScript engines which make it possible to build complex (and not so complex) games on the Web," says Finette. "With these technologies being delivered through modern browsers today, the time is ripe for pushing the platform.  And what better way than through games?  Traditionally games and game developers have been at the forefront of technology, often pushing the boundaries of what was thought possible."

    Mozilla Labs Gets Into Gaming

    Mozilla is launching an international gaming competition to kickstart the new initiative. The event, called Game On2010, will be open to all developers using open web technologies. 

    Mozilla Labs Gets Into Gaming

    Mozilla’s sudden interest in gaming comes as Google (a direct competitor with Chrome) has begun placing a great deal of resources in the gaming space. In fact, Google’s efforts (at least some of them) are directly related to Chrome, and the Chrome Web Store.

  • Chrome Celebrates 2nd Anniversary with New Stable Version

    Google announced today that it is releasing a new stable version of Chrome, which the company says is even faster and more streamlined. In fact, Google claims it is three times faster on JavaScript performance than it was two year ago, when Chrome was first launched (it’s the two-year anniversary, by the way).

    "We’ve also been working on simplifying the ‘chrome’ of Chrome," says product manager Brian Rakowski. "As you can see, we took the already minimalist user interface and stripped it down a bit more to make it easier to use. We combined Chrome’s two menus into one, revisited the location of the buttons, cleaned up the treatment of the URL and the Omnibox, and adjusted the color scheme of the browser to be easier on the eyes."

    "As always, we’re hard at work on making Chrome even faster, and working on ways to improve graphics performance in the browser through hardware acceleration," adds Rakowski. "With the Chrome Web Store, we hope to make it much easier to find and use great applications on the web. We also ratcheted up the pace of our releases so that we can get new features and improvements to everyone more quickly."

    New Chrome Stable Release

    The new stable version can be downloaded here. Google has a list of all stable and beta channel updates here.

    If you’re more interested in the fact that it is Chrome’s 2nd birthday, you can get more reflection on how far the browser has come in those two short years by reading this celebratory post from Google.

  • Opera Enters Agreement With Telenor for Co-Branded Browsers

    Opera has announced a non-exclusive agreement with the Telenor Group, aimed at stimulating growth of mobile Internet services across Telenor’s business units.

    As part of the agreement, Opera and any of Telenor’s business units may develop a co-branded version of Opera Mini that is adapted to the local operator.

    "Telenor has a vision to provide mobile Internet with a great user experience to everyone. We are confident that this agreement will help us provide Internet to a larger user group across the world," says Morten Karlsen Sørby, EVP and Head of Corporate Development at the Telenor Group. "We are thrilled to work closely with Opera, a company that spun out of Telenor in the late 1990s, and have grown to become one of Norway’s most successful technology exports.”

    "Our goal is simple: help Telenor grow its user base and revenues by delivering an unparalleled Internet experience to every local operator in the Telenor network. Telenor’s strong global position is a result of their relentless commitment to the customer, in markets as diverse as Sweden, Russia, Bangladesh and Hungary,” says Lars Boilesen, CEO, in Opera. "We are proud of our heritage from Telenor’s research labs. Today, we join efforts to give more people the opportunity to fully enjoy the web on their mobile phones."

    The first deployment of Opera Mini in the Telenor network is coming in September.

    Opera says Opera Mini is the world’s most popular mobile browser, with 60 million monthly users.

     

  • Firefox 4 Gets Panorama and Sync

    About a month ago, Firefox Creative Lead Aza Raskin revealed "Tab Candy", a Firefox feature designed to make managing tabs easier. It shows an overview of all tabs so they can be quickly located. It also includes other organizational features like tab groups.

    It has only been available in alpha form, but Raskin announced today that the feature is coming to Firefox 4, and starting today it will be known as Firefox Panorama, rather than Tab Candy.

    Firefox Panorama: How To from Aza Raskin on Vimeo.

    "While there are many directions still left to explore (some of which are covered in the Tab Candy announcement video), there is a strong set of design principle that have and will continue to guide development," says Raskin. "We’ve already see[n] activity from extension authors to extend the capabilities of Panorama, which makes now a perfect time to discuss Panorama’s design principles."

    A Firefox 4 beta can be downloaded here. Mozilla also announced that Sync will be available in the next beta update.

  • As Long As There Are Links, The Web Will Live

    An article from Wired caught a lot of attention this week when it proclaimed that the Web is dead. Obviously, this is a sensational headline and a perfect example of linkbait, but it worked. It received the attention it was looking for, and it is still an interesting and thought-provoking read, though the web is far from dead. 

    Do you think the web is dead?
    Share your thoughts.

    A lot of the criticism over the article deals with a traffic chart it presents, and how misleading it is, but I don’t want to focus on that. That’s been ripped apart enough. look at some of the things author Chris Anderson and Michael Wolff say.

    The article says, "Two decades after its birth, the World Wide Web is in decline, as simpler, sleeker services — think apps — are less about the searching and more about the getting."

    This to me is more a declaration that search is dead or dying, which it is not. There will never be enough "getting" to eliminate all searching. There will always be specific needs that arise, which will require searching, and while the apps we use to do that search may be becoming more diversified, there will still be a need for that one all-encompassing gateway to search (which happens to currently be Google for the majority of people).  Not to mention the fact that we’ll need to search for the apps themselves.

    I’ve talked about this diversification of search numerous times. What it boils down to is that people will not stop using search engines, they will just use them less for certain kinds of searches if they have an app that they like for that particular kind of information. This is already happening.

    The article says, "Ecommerce continues to thrive on the Web, and no company is going to shut its Web site as an information resource. More important, the great virtue of today’s Web is that so much of it is noncommercial. The wide-open Web of peer production, the so-called generative Web where everyone is free to create what they want, continues to thrive, driven by the nonmonetary incentives of expression, attention, reputation, and the like. But the notion of the Web as the ultimate marketplace for digital delivery is now in doubt."

    I would say, not really. How long has search been that "ultimate marketplace"? Isn’t this again, basically saying that search (not the web) is dying (which again it’s not)?

    It comes down to access points and how we get our information, which threatens to reduce time spent with search, but will not eliminate it. That reduced time, is perhaps why Google really needs this "Google Me" thing to work (though we still don’t really know what this will consist of). The more apps or access points that connect you to a Google profile, the more Google can make up for that reduced time you spend searching It makes a case for that newfound interest in social games), and it certainly makes a case for why Google provides mobile ads across third-party apps.

    This is all something that businesses really need to consider. If all of your eggs are in the search marketing basket, you better really start thinking about mobile and apps. Google is still a major factor here. In fact, this is very connected to Google’s recent emphasis on Places, which it has effectively turned into its own mobile app. Notice that other Google features have their own apps as well.

    Google Places Icon - Launch from homescreen

    All of that said, search itself will always be an app. In fact it’s usually more than that. Search is its own hard key on your phone – maybe as important an app as the browser.

    A Web of Links

    Clearly apps are becoming a bigger part of our lives, and may continue to dominate more of our web access, but we’re still connecting with the greater web, and the browser is certainly far from dead.

    Many of the apps we use are just different ways of presenting the web’s information, and ultimately utilize links to other parts of the web. Sometimes, they even take us out of the apps and into the browser. Think about links from feed readers, Twitter, Facebook, Digg, etc. If you read a blog post, starting from some feed-reading app, and you click on a link to another post from that original post, you’re clicking through one of the web’s many paths. As long as content is connected to other content through links, the web will remain alive and well. Many of the most popular apps strongly depend on links to outside content to keep user interest. How popular do you think Facebook or Twitter would be if you couldn’t link to outside content?

    We will see more convergence of the browser and the OS (iOS, Android, Chrome OS, etc.), particularly as data moves more into the cloud, but this is all just the evolution of browsing the web. Never mind the fact that the majority of PCs are far from coming with a web-based operating system at this point. This could change one day, but even then, see the above points. Desktop versions (aka: websites) of many of the apps we use are far more efficient and feature-rich than their mobile app counterparts, which is why people will continue to use those as well.

    The article says, "Openness is a wonderful thing in the nonmonetary economy of peer production. But eventually our tolerance for the delirious chaos of infinite competition finds its limits. Much as we love freedom and choice, we also love things that just work, reliably and seamlessly. And if we have to pay for what we love, well, that increasingly seems OK." To that same point, it also says, "As much as we intellectually appreciate openness, at the end of the day we favor the easiest path. We’ll pay for convenience and reliability, which is why iTunes can sell songs for 99 cents despite the fact that they are out there, somewhere, in some form, for free."

    There is some truth to this, which certainly lends to the fact that apps are indeed popular channels for accessing content. However, that by no means eliminates the web browser for accessing content that apps simply don’t cater to. The web browser is an app, and probably the app that trumps all other apps because of that openness and freedom of choice. When you don’t want to pay for convenience, the web browser will often come through. When there isn’t a known app for what you want, the web browser will often come through.

    Michael Arrington at TechCrunch makes another great point: "Apps are great on mobile phones with small screens. But they are a pain to install and keep synchronized. Eventually having less local software will make sense on phones, too. All you really need is that browser virtual machine and you can pull everything else from the cloud. This is obvious."

    In fact, the article itself says, "If a standard Web browser can act like an app, offering the sort of clean interface and seamless interactivity that iPad users want, perhaps users will resist the trend to the paid, closed, and proprietary."

    It’s entirely possible that these mobile apps are the "shiny objects" of the moment, and eventually users will find that they just have too many of them to keep track of on their phones, and rather than fill up their storage, will just access more of them through their web versions via the web browser.

    Is the web dying? Is search? You tell us.