WebProNews

Tag: Unions

  • Amazon Ordered to Stop Anti-Union Retaliation

    Amazon Ordered to Stop Anti-Union Retaliation

    Amazon’s anti-union efforts have been dealt a major blow, with a judge ordering the company to stop anti-union retaliation.

    Amazon has a long history of fighting union efforts. The company has been accused of intimidation tactics, has hired Pinkerton detectives to combat unionization, and has been accused of wrongfully firing employees who tried organizing. The company’s actions have even prompted its investors to raise concerns.

    According to Labor 411, Judge Diane Gujarati of the United States District Court for the District of Eastern New York has issued an injunction against Amazon, ordering it to cease and desist from any retaliatory measures, such as firing employees who organize.

    The decision was in response to accusations that Amazon wrongfully fired an employee at its Staten Island location during unionization efforts there.

    “The Judge’s order in this case recognizes Amazon’s unlawful conduct and provides the full force of a federal court injunction to prohibit Amazon from further discharging employees for engaging in protected concerted activity,” said Region 29 Brooklyn Director Teresa Poor. “This relief is critical to ensure that Amazon employees can fully and freely exercise their rights to join together and improve their working conditions, including by forming, assisting, or joining a union.”

  • Amazon Intensifying Anti-Union Efforts After Workers Vote to Unionize

    Amazon Intensifying Anti-Union Efforts After Workers Vote to Unionize

    Amazon is intensifying its anti-union efforts in the wake of Staten Island employees voting to unionize.

    Amazon is notoriously anti-union, resorting to intimidation tactics and Pinkerton detectives to combat union efforts. The company has even been working on an internal app, one that would block pro-union words. In the wake of the Staten Island unionization vote, Amazon is ramping its efforts, according to Motherboard.

    “Amazon’s tactics have gotten very, very intense,” said Madeline Wesley, an Amazon warehouse worker, who was written up on April 10 for “soliciting” co-workers. “They’re getting away with lots of illegal anti-union activity.”

    Amazon has already been forced to walk back some of its previous actions, entering into an agreement with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to email some 1 million employees to inform them of their right to organize.

    According to Motherboard, experts believe Amazon is now in violation those agreements.

    “Amazon is violating the national settlement agreement,” said Seth Goldstein, an attorney who represents Amazon Labor Union workers. “These are blatant attacks on an agreement they were a party to. The core of the matter is Amazon agreed to something but they’re violating it because it suits their purposes for winning the election.”

    Given the company’s past actions, it’s a safe bet it may soon find itself in hot water again.

  • Teamsters Vote to Prioritize Unionizing Amazon Workers

    Teamsters Vote to Prioritize Unionizing Amazon Workers

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters has voted to create a division specifically tasked with assisting Amazon workers.

    Amazon has been the target of increased unionization efforts, efforts which the company has pulled out all the stops to combat. The Teamsters already represent 1.4 million delivery drivers and have been vocal opponents of Amazon’s anti-union tactics.

    The union voted Thursday to create a special division to help workers in Amazon’s logistics businesses, including delivery drivers and warehouse workers. “Special Resolution: Building Worker Power at Amazon” passed with overwhelming support, with 1,562 votes in favor and only nine opposed, according to NBC News.

    “Amazon presents a massive threat to working-class communities and good jobs in the logistics industry,” Randy Korgan, the Teamsters National Director for Amazon, said. “Amazon workers face dehumanizing, unsafe and low-pay jobs, with high turnover and no voice at work.”

    “Amazon workers are calling for safer and better working conditions and with today’s resolution we are activating the full force of our union to support them,” Korgan added.

    Only time will tell if the Teamsters’ efforts will be successful, but the timing is sure to put additional pressure on Amazon as it faces increased regulatory scrutiny.

  • Teamsters May Set Their Sights on Amazon

    Teamsters May Set Their Sights on Amazon

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters may take on Amazon at a time when the company is aggressively combating unionization efforts.

    The Teamsters are the most well-known union in the US, with a long and storied history. The group also boasts some 1.4 million delivery drivers, putting it on a collision course with Amazon.

    Amazon has drawn significant criticism in recent years for its treatment of its workers, including delivery drivers. As recently as February, the company settled with the FTC for some $62 million dollars over its practice of illegally withholding tips from its drivers.

    The company has aggressively fought unionization efforts by its employees, however, successfully defeating an effort by warehouse workers in Alabama. The Teamsters have already come out swinging against the e-commerce giant, urging the House Judiciary to pass antitrust legislation that would target Amazon.

    On Thursday, the union will vote on whether to make unionizing Amazon drivers its top priority, according to The Seattle Times.

    “There is no clearer example of how America is failing the working class than Amazon,” says the resolution that will be voted on.

  • Congress Out To Kill Uber and the Entire Gig Economy Again

    Congress Out To Kill Uber and the Entire Gig Economy Again

    Congress, in a political payoff to unions, have again introduced legislation to effectively make gig economy jobs like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, etc. illegal. The difference this time is that since they now control the House, Senate, and the Presidency it could very well pass. The legislation is modeled after the gig killing bill that was passed in California and that was later overturned via initiative by the people. Unfortunately, at the national level there is no initiative process to overturn Congress.

    Despite the job-killing nature of the bill the Democrat’s press release sings its praises:

    “Top Democrats Introduce Bill to Protect Workers’ Right to Organize and Make our Economy Work for Everyone. Legislation addresses growing income inequality by protecting workers’ right to join a union and negotiate for higher wages and better benefits.”

    The House bill was introduced by House Committee on Education and Labor Chairman Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03), Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (FL-24), Congressman Andy Levin (MI-09), Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), and Congressman Brendan Boyle (PA-02).

    The Senate bill was introduced by Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Chair Patty Murray (D-WA) and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

    The bill mimics the California bill which Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said would effectively end Uber as we know it in California. The company is already losing money and it would be impossible for it to pay a minimum wage of $15 an hour plus benefits to all of its 1 million drivers. It also begs the question, does the Democrat party not realize that the very people who love Uber and who are independent contractors for Uber probably are also majority Democrat voters? After all, the gig economy was popularized by liberal San Francisco based Uber itself.

    Without an initiative process at the national level, the only way to keep the millions of gig jobs alive and to keep rideshare and food delivery readily available would be for their voters to vote the majority party out of office. There really is no middle ground here. In the meantime, if this bill passes Congress and is signed by Biden the gig economy will become illegal.

  • Amazon’s Italy Workers Go On Strike

    Amazon’s Italy Workers Go On Strike

    Amazon’s workers in Italy are going on a 24-hour strike to protest working conditions.

    Workers in several warehouse facilities, including in Tuscany, Florence and Pisa, are going on a 24-hour strike, the first to impact Amazon’s logistics operations in Italy on a national level, according to CNBC.

    The strike comes at a time when Amazon’s importance to the global supply chain is greater than ever, and while the company is facing increased scrutiny and criticism for how it treats its workers. The company has taken aggressive measures to combat unionization, hiring Pinkerton detectives to monitor efforts and going full-court press against unionization in Alabama.

    Salvatore Pellecchia, general secretary of trade union FIT-CISL, told CNBC that 75% of Amazon workers in Italy joined the strike, despite many of them being temporary workers, at the most risk of being replaced.

    “If Amazon does not change its position, we will be forced to organize another strike,” Pellecchia said in a statement. “Amazon has registered a huge increase in turnover and profits thanks to the pandemic, and now must talk with us to give its employee what they are waiting for.”

    The strike is the latest setback for the company, and may encourage other unions to do the same.

  • Amazon Stiffs Drivers $62 Million in Tips

    Amazon Stiffs Drivers $62 Million in Tips

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced Amazon is settling to the tune of $61.7 million for tips it withheld from drivers.

    As part fo the Amazon Flex program, drivers were promised $18–25 per hour for making deliveries. In addition, ads recruiting Flex drivers routinely said: “You will receive 100% of the tips you earn while delivering with Amazon Flex.”

    Amazon also assured customers that any tips they gave would go straight to drivers. There’s only one problem: Amazon didn’t pay its drivers the tips from customers, pocketing nearly $62 million.

    “Rather than passing along 100 percent of customers’ tips to drivers, as it had promised to do, Amazon used the money itself,” said Daniel Kaufman, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Our action today returns to drivers the tens of millions of dollars in tips that Amazon misappropriated, and requires Amazon to get drivers’ permission before changing its treatment of tips in the future.”

    “This theft did not go unnoticed by Amazon’s drivers, many of whom expressed anger and confusion to the company,” said FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra. “But, rather than coming clean, Amazon took elaborate steps to mislead its drivers and conceal its theft, sending them canned responses that repeated the company’s lies. The complaint charges that Amazon executives chose not to alter the practice, instead viewing drivers’ complaints as a ‘PR risk,’ which they sought to contain through deception.”

    To make matters worse, in 2016, Amazon lowered the hourly rate they were paying drivers without notifying them. Instead, Amazon used the tips it had been withholding as a fund to maintain the $18-25 per hour rate, making drivers think they were receiving the same hourly rate.

    In essence, Amazon was ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul,’ stealing from drivers tips to cover for the fact that it had lowered drivers hourly rates without telling them. Amazon only stopped this behavior after it became aware of the FTC’s investigation in 2019.

    The $61.7 million settlement will be used by the FTC to compensate those drivers who were impacted. Amazon is also “prohibited from making any changes to how a driver’s tips are used as compensation without first obtaining the driver’s express informed consent.”

    For a company already accused of illegally firing workers for trying to organize unions, and using Pinkerton detectives to monitor workers and thwart unionization efforts, it’s little wonder that Amazon employees continue working to unionize.

    Amazon’s behavior in this matter is reprehensible, and represents a new low for corporate/worker relations.

  • Amazon Warehouse Workers Voting On Unionization

    Amazon Warehouse Workers Voting On Unionization

    Amazon warehouse workers are preparing to vote on whether to form the company’s first union.

    Amazon is famously opposed to its employees unionizing. The company has gone to extreme measures, even hiring Pinkerton detectives to monitor efforts. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) accused Amazon of threatening, suspending and terminating employees for trying to organize.

    It appears Amazon’s efforts have not been successful, however, as employees at the company’s warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama are moving forward with plans to vote on unionization. The NLRB has scheduled the vote for February 8 through March 29, and will involve approximately 6,000 employees.

    It remains to be seen if the vote will pass. If it does, however, it would be a big step forward for unionization efforts within one of the biggest companies in the US.

  • Amazon Accused of Illegally Firing Employee Over Working Conditions

    Amazon Accused of Illegally Firing Employee Over Working Conditions

    The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has accused Amazon of illegally firing an employee advocating for better working conditions.

    On the heels of news the NLRB accused Google of illegally spying on and firing employees, not to mention its firing of Timnit Gebru, Amazon is now in hot water too.

    Amazon has already made headlines for aggressively working against unionization efforts, even going so far as to hire Pinkertons to monitor employees suspected of organizing. At least six employees claim they were fired in the spring over their efforts to improve working conditions.

    According to BuzzFeed News, however, the NLRB has found that one of those employees, Courtney Bowden, has a legitimate case. In fact, “the agency found merit in her allegations that Amazon threatened, suspended, and ultimately terminated her because she had been talking with coworkers at an Amazon warehouse in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, about pay and other workplace issues, which is a legally protected activity.” At least one of those issues was providing sick pay for part-time employees.

    The case will now go before an administrative law judge March 9, 2021. Given Amazon’s history, its recent actions and the NLRB’s findings, it seems likely the judge may find in Bowden’s favor.

    Either way, this has not been a good week for Big Tech and employee relations.

  • Google Accused of Unlawfully Spying On and Firing Workers

    Google Accused of Unlawfully Spying On and Firing Workers

    The National Labor Relations Board has filed a complaint against Google, accusing the search giant of monitoring employees and firing them without just cause.

    According to Reuters, Google is accused of monitoring and questioning employees that were attempting to form a union and were critical of the company’s efforts to discourage such activities. The employees were placed on administrative leave and ultimately fired.

    Google claims the employees breached the company’s policies, and accessed information they were not authorized to. As CNETreports, however, the employees say they didn’t break any rules by accessing the information in question.

    What’s more, the NLRB has found that Google acted unlawfully, both in placing the employees on leave and firing them, as well as in their efforts to investigate the employees, since the efforts were based on deterring unionization.

    Google has increasingly been under fire from its own employees for a wide range of issues, including working with China, taking on military contracts and generally backtracking on its original motto of “don’t be evil.”

    Google has until December 16 to respond, after which the case will go before an administrative law judge on April 12.

  • AFL-CIO President: Facebook Acted As An Illegal Employer Advocate

    AFL-CIO President: Facebook Acted As An Illegal Employer Advocate

    “They acted here as an illegal employer advocate to stop free speech and to stop unionization,” says AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka. “Facebook holds itself out as this champion of free speech. Yet here it is developing a platform that allows employers to totally deny their employee’s free speech. We demand an apology and they should abandon further work on these types of platforms.”

    Richard Trumka, President of the AFL-CIO, blasts Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg for building a platform feature that allows employers to ban certain words related to unionization in employee communications:

    We Demand An Apology From Mark Zuckerberg

    Facebook holds itself out as this champion of free speech. Yet here it is developing a platform that allows employers to totally deny their employee’s free speech. It also allows employers to blacklist (certain speech) which is illegal and to sort of truncate or eliminate their ability to talk about unionization which is also illegal.

    Mark Zuckerberg is doing two things here which are terrible. One he’s doing illegal stuff like blacklisting and making eavesdropping on the employee’s talk of unionization, which is illegal. The second thing is he’s undermining the notion of free speech. It’s only his free speech that he’s been a champion of, not workers free speech. We should have an apology. We demand an apology and they should abandon further work on these types of platforms.

    Facebook Acted As An Illegal Employer Advocate

    We think there needs to be a change to (Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act which was put in place to protect platforms from lawsuits resulting from the content posted by their users). Things like this shouldn’t be allowed to happen. They acted here as more than a platform. They acted here as an illegal employer advocate to stop free speech and to stop unionization. They shouldn’t be shielded from that type of conduct or other conduct similar to that.

    AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka: Facebook Acted As An Illegal Employer Advocate
  • Detroit Bankruptcy Official, Unions Heated

    “Certainly the court must conclude that the bankruptcy filing was a foregone conclusion.”

    After filing for protection more than four months ago, Detroit is now officially bankrupt.

    According to The Huffington Post, Steven Rhodes, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, ruled Tuesday that Detroit is eligible for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection. This allows officials of the Motor City to negotiate in court with bondholders, pension funds, unions, and other stakeholders. Detroit’s liabilities have been estimated at approximately $18 million and many say that bankruptcy is the only way the city can settle its debts.

    “The city cannot legally increase its tax revenues nor can it further reduce its expenses without further endangering health and safety,” Rhodes said.

    Despite heated arguments by pension and union representatives, Rhodes also added that retiree pensions are also on the table for cuts.

    Originally in July, a coalition including police and fire-fighter unions, retired city employees, and others sued to block the filing. They argued that they were not given an opportunity to find another solution to the filing and that the Michigan state constitution explicitly protects pension benefits from being cut. However, Mr. Rhodes ruled that it has long been understood that contracts are generally broken to creditors when a bankruptcy proceeding has begun and that since pension benefits are typically contracts. That means they do not hold any special protection.

    BBC reports that residents of Detroit, like Erma and Gordon MacDonald, say, “If they take my pension away, then we’ll be in bad shape.”

    “I worked hard for Detroit for 20 years, played by the rules, and already made significant sacrifices – taking pay cut after pay cut,” David Allen, 50, said. “In return for risking my life to serve my community, the city promised to take care of my family – but instead the city is retiring us into poverty.”

    Allen is a retired Detroit firefighter who lost the use of his legs during a spinal injury sustained on the job in Detroit.

    Rhodes continues to assure worried citizens that the court won’t take the pension cuts “lightly” and will exhaust all other options before making any changes. Pensioners on average receive $20,000 a year or less.

    The criteria included in Chapter 9 bankruptcy are that: the city is insolvent (its unable to pay its debts and owes more than it can collect), the bankruptcy filing itself was constitutional, the city is in “service delivery insolvency” (it cannot afford to provide for the health and welfare of residents), and Detroit officials desire to adjust the municipality’s debts and effect a plan of adjustment.

    Another important factor was to establish that city officials negotiated in good faith with creditors before filing for bankruptcy.

    Detroit “could have and should have filed for bankruptcy long before it did, perhaps even years before,” Rhodes said. “Certainly the court must conclude that the bankruptcy filing was a foregone conclusion, at least in 2013.”

    If the city, also known as 8 Mile, had been found ineligible for bankruptcy protection, it would have been sued by thousands of creditors in court for failing to pay its debts. Kevyn Orr, Detroit emergency manager, said that if Detroit didn’t meet Chapter 9 requirements, it would be an “Armageddon-like scenario.”

    “It gives us a chance to move forward with a clean slate and make good decisions that will improve the quality of life for Detroit’s citizens,” current Mayor Dave Bing said about the bankruptcy.

    However, the legal battles continue with the AFSCME, the city’s largest employee union, filing an appeal of Rhodes’ decision immediately after it was announced.

    The city is now home to about 700,000 residents, down from the peak of 1.8 million in 1950, and has more than 150,000 abandoned buildings, including former schools, train stations, and factories.

    image via: YouTube

  • BART Strike: Last-Second Proposals Could Avert Friday Morning Shutdown

    The Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) has until midnight Thursday to arrive at an agreement with its labor unions. Negotiators offered a last second contract proposal Thursday afternoon in an effort to avoid a Friday morning shutdown that will affect some 400,000 riders in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    As of 6pm, BART and union officials were still negotiating. No deal had been reached, and to the frustration of Bay Area residents, union officials hadn’t made an announcement about whether or not they would strike.


    Today marks the end of a 60-day cooling off period ordered by California governor Jerry Brown back in August. Not surprisingly, one of the big points of contention in the negotiations is wage increases. The opposing sides were getting closer to an agreement when an all-day negotiation session fell through Wednesday night due to what BART called a “miscommunication.”

    Union officials claim that management caused Wednesday’s break-down in negotiations by taking back a recent offer. Josie Mooney, chief negotiator for one of the two major labor unions involved said “We were stunned.”
    As negotiations continue, Bay Area commuters hold their breath and hope that they won’t see a repeat of the July strike that slowed automobile traffic on freeways and bridges to a crawl and overtaxed the city’s busses and ferries.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Hoffa Remains Sought by FBI in Michigan

    Hoffa Remains Sought by FBI in Michigan

    The final resting place of teamster official Jimmy Hoffa has remained a mystery for nearly 40 years. Various theories and speculative musings have kept the mystery alive all this time. Not a year goes by that someone doesn’t claim to know where the mob-connected union leader is buried (or interred, or mixed into cement, ect…).

    This week, the FBI has taken one of these tips seriously enough to commence digging operations near a small town north of Detroit. According to the Detroit Free Press, the FBI and Oakland County Sheriff’s Office are surveying a vacant field in Oakland Township, Michigan. The site is where Detroit mob boss Tony Zerilli claimed Hoffa is buried back in January. The FBI told the Free Press that Zerilli’s claims could be credible, based on his family connections at the time of Hoffa’s disappearance.

    Hoffa disappeared on July 30, 1975. His car was found in the parking lot of the Manchus Red Fox Restaurant in Bloomfield Township, a suburb of Detroit. He had allegedly gone to the restaurant to visit mafia leaders, who were later found not to have been at the restaurant. Though Hoffa was declared legally dead in 1982, the FBI has continued to investigate his disappearance.

    (via Detroit Free Press)

  • North Dakota Death Rate Highest For Workers, Shows Report

    North Dakota Death Rate Highest For Workers, Shows Report

    The AFL-CIO, the largest union federation in the U.S., this week released its annual report on worker deaths. The report found that 4,693 U.S. workers died while on the job in 2011, and that an estimated 50,000 die each year from “occupational diseases.”

    The report breaks down the demographics of the latest worker death data available. Latino workers were found to have the highest workplace fatality rates, with a rate 14% higher than other workers. North Dakota was also found to be the most dangerous state, with a fatality rate of 12.4 per 100,000 workers.

    “In 2013, it is unacceptable that so many hardworking men and women continue to die on the job,” said Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO President. “No one should have to sacrifice his or her life or health and safety in order to earn a decent living. Yet, elected leaders, business groups and employers have failed to provide adequate health and safety protections for working families. At the same time, too many politicians and business leaders are actively working to dismantle working people’s right to collectively bargain on the job and speak out against unsafe, unjust working conditions. This is a disgrace to all those who have died. America’s workers deserve better.”

    The AFL-CIO’s statement on the report mentioned the recent West Texas fertilizer plant explosion as an example of how, it says, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is underfunded and understaffed. The organization also stated that it believes OSHA penalties are “too low to be taken seriously.”

  • Vegas: 98 Arrests Made During Union Protest

    A protest on Las Vegas Boulevard on Wednesday culminated in the arrest of 98 union protesters.

    According to a Las Vegas Sun report, the protesters were members of Culinary Union Local 226. The protest took place outside the The Cosmopolitan hotel and casino.

    The union states that it has been in contract negotiations with Deutsche Bank, the owner of The Cosmopolitan, for over two years and “have not come to an agreement on major issues.” Worker contracts are scheduled to expire on June 1.

    The arrests came after some of the protesters sat in the middle of Las Vegas Boulevard, blocking traffic for over an hour. The protesters in the road were well aware that the act would likely result in their arrests. According to the Vegas Sun, they were surrounded on walkways and sidewalks by over 2,000 of their fellow protesters.

    FOX5 Vegas – KVVU

    (Image via Culinary Union/Instagram)

  • Scott Walker Death Threats Flood In On Twitter

    Yesterday Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker survived a recall election that began when he pushed through a bill that severely hampered public unions in their bargaining rights. According to Wikipedia the bill, 2011 Wisconsin Act 10, primarily impacted the following areas: collective bargaining, compensation, retirement, health insurance, and sick leave of public sector employees. The bill was passed into law and became effective as of June 29, 2011. The only represented public employees that are exempt from the changes to the collective bargaining law are State Patrol Troopers and State Patrol Inspectors.

    This brought extreme anger from democratic voters and also brought massive protests to Madison. The other thing that really made this famous is that when the bill was proposed, the Democrats in the State Senate didn’t have the votes to filibuster it so they used a law that said at least one member of the opposite party had to be in attendance to vote on the bill. Their next move made headlines as they fled the state and hid out in Illinois so that the state police in Wisconsin couldn’t force them to come back.

    After the act was passed a recall effort began and was successful in getting the number of votes needed. So last night Scott Walker easily defeated his opponent in the recall election and what came next is a disgusting display. Death threats actually started to roll in on Twitter! Check out the disgrace below and form your own opinion on these types of people who would hate on someone for winning an election. Both sides do it and it is disgusting!

    Before I kill Scott walker household family , Imma Hang their mom & set her on fire & make them watch wit choppers to their heads
    1 hour ago via txt · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Somebody gone kill Scott Walker man.
    10 hours ago via TweetCaster for iOS · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    I might just have to kill scott walker n take that charge
    12 hours ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    KILL SCOTT WALKER KILL SCOTT WALKER KILL SCOTT WALKER KILL SCOTT WALKER KILL SCOTT WALKER KILL SCOTT WALKER! Ole Bitch Ass Pig Ass Nigga!!!!
    13 hours ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    If Walker win he best not come to Milwaukee. Niggas will have a bullet with his name on it. Real shit
    13 hours ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Can’t We Just Shoot Scott Walker Hoe Ass .
    12 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite