WebProNews

Tag: unionization

  • Amazon Once Again Going Full-Press Against Unionization Efforts

    Amazon Once Again Going Full-Press Against Unionization Efforts

    Amazon is once again ramping up its anti-unionization efforts, posting signs in its ALB1 warehouse in upstate New York, telling workers: “Don’t sign a card.”

    Engadget was the first to break the story, with workers at the warehouse sending pictures of the signs to the outlet. According to one of Engadget’s sources, the digital signs cycle through seven slides, all of which discourage organizing.

    Credit: Engadget

    “It’s on a constant loop while people punch in and punch out of their shifts,” he said, “[when] they go on their breaks, or they go on their lunch. Any time that we’re going to be up towards the front.”

    Amazon has a long history of aggressively fighting unionization efforts, even breaking labor laws to do so. The company has been known to hire Pinkerton detectives to further its efforts and has even made investors uncomfortable with its aggressive tactics.

    It remains to be seen if the National Labor Relations Board will challenge the legality of Amazon’s latest move.

  • Amazon Makes Major Workplace Change in Alleged Attempt to Combat Unionization

    Amazon Makes Major Workplace Change in Alleged Attempt to Combat Unionization

    Amazon is prohibiting off-duty warehouse workers from entering its buildings in an alleged effort to combat unionization.

    According to AP News, Amazon informed its employees via the company’s internal app. Employees are not allowed to come into Amazon’s buildings on their days off or before or after their shifts.

    Amazon has a well-established reputation for aggressively combating organization efforts. The company has been accused of trying to intimidate workers during previous organization attempts and has even resorted to using Pinkerton detectives to keep tabs on such efforts.

    The company denies its latest move has anything to do with combatting organization efforts, insisting it’s more about employee safety.

    “There’s nothing more important than the safety of our employees and the physical security of our buildings,” Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel told AP News. “This policy regarding building access applies to building interiors and working areas. It does not limit employee access to non-working areas outside of our facilities.”

    Employees aren’t buying it, believing the measure is a direct threat to their efforts.

    “On our days off, we come to work and we engage our co-workers in the break rooms,” said Rev. Ryan Brown, an Amazon warehouse worker in Garner, North Carolina, who is working to organize his fellow workers.

    “This was a direct response to that, to try to stop organizing by any means necessary,” Brown said.

  • Tesla Monitored Employee Facebook Group During Unionization Push

    Tesla Monitored Employee Facebook Group During Unionization Push

    New details have emerged about Tesla’s response to unionization efforts, including the fact that the company monitored an employee Facebook group to keep tabs on developments.

    Tech companies have a complicated relationship with unionization efforts. Until recently, unions within the tech industry were almost unheard of and many companies are aggressively fighting recent organization efforts. According to CNBC, Tesla hired a PR firm to help monitor an employee Facebook group, as well as employees’ broader social media, during unionization efforts in 2017.

    MWW PR was the firm Tesla hired. The firm primarily monitored discussions about a sexual harassment lawsuit and allegedly unfair labor practices within the company.

    “MWW consulted with Tesla in 2017-2018 on a broad employee communications engagement during a period of rapid growth at the Company,” a spokesperson told CNBC. “It is a common practice to review media coverage and public social conversation about a company to gain insights into issues and perceptions of stakeholders about the brand.”

    While Tesla may not have broken any laws with its actions, the revelation is not sitting well with many experts.

    “Any organization can engage in ‘social listening,’ using publicly available social media data to gain insights for product development, or to understand voters, public and employee sentiment and more,” Jennifer M. Grygiel, a Syracuse University associate professor, said. “But there are laws in the US that protect the rights of people to organize. If you’re a PR firm, or a manager who has to infiltrate a semi-private group? That’s dishonest. And I doubt Tesla would send a PR firm to figure out how to support workers involved in organizing.”

  • Microsoft President: ‘Our Employees Will Never Need to Organize’

    Microsoft President: ‘Our Employees Will Never Need to Organize’

    Amid a growing trend of unionization among tech company employees, Microsoft believes its employees will never need to do so.

    Company president Brad Smith penned a blog post outlining the company’s approach to employees organizing and labor organizations in general. The company is establishing itself as far more open to working with unions and labor organizations than many of its rivals, although Smith maintains that Microsoft’s “employees will never need to organize to have a dialogue with Microsoft’s leaders.”

    Unionization has become a controversial topic within the tech community, with Amazon, Apple, and others pushing back against unionization efforts. According to Smith, Microsoft believes a proactive approach to engaging with employees, as well as open door policy to leadership, is the key to keeping employees happy.

    “We believe in the importance of listening to our employees’ concerns,” Smith writes. “Our leaders have an open door policy, and we invest in listening systems and employee resource groups that constantly help us understand better both what is working and where we need to improve. But we recognize that there may be times when some employees in some countries may wish to form or join a union.”

    Read more: Amazon May Block Pro-Union Words in Upcoming App

    At the same time, should employees wish to unionize, Smith makes it clear that Microsoft will chart a much different path than many other tech companies.

    “We are committed to creative and collaborative approaches with unions when employees wish to exercise their rights and Microsoft is presented with a specific unionization proposal,” Smith continues. “In many instances, employee unionization proposals may open an opportunity for Microsoft to work with an existing union on agreed upon processes for employees to exercise their rights through a private agreement. We are committed to collaborative approaches that will make it simpler, rather than more difficult, for our employees to make informed decisions and to exercise their legal right to choose whether to form or join a union.”

    Microsoft is clearly working hard to proactively address concerns that are causing many of its rivals to draw regulatory scrutiny. The company recently made changes to its cloud policies in response to complaints from that it was unfairly using its position against smaller rivals.

  • Amazon May Block Pro-Union Words in Upcoming App

    Amazon May Block Pro-Union Words in Upcoming App

    Amazon’s anti-union efforts continue to ramp up, with the company investigating the possibility of banning pro-union words in a planned internal app.

    Amazon has a long history of fighting against unionization, even going so far as to hire Pinkerton detectives to thwart organization efforts. The company has also been accused of violating labor laws in an effort to fight unionization at its Bessemer, Alabama warehouse. The company now appears to be taking its efforts even further, investigating the possibility of banning pro-union terminology in a planned app.

    According to The Intercept, the company is in the planning phases of developing a chat app for its workers. The company held a high-level meeting in August 2021 to discuss creating a social media app for workers in an effort to improve morale and sponsor employee happiness.

    As part of the planning, Amazon is looking at blocking a slew of words and phrases, including “union,” “grievance,” “pay raise,” “compensation,” “unfair,” “injustice,” “fairness,” “this is concerning,” and many more.

    “With free text, we risk people writing Shout-Outs that generate negative sentiments among the viewers and the receivers,” read a document seen by The Intercept. “We want to lean towards being restrictive on the content that can be posted to prevent a negative associate experience.”

    The company has said “many” of the words listed in the documents will not be screened out but, given Amazon’s history of fighting against unionization, it’s doubtful many believe that statement.

  • Project Vivian: Google’s Top-Secret Anti-Union Effort

    Project Vivian: Google’s Top-Secret Anti-Union Effort

    More information about Google’s anti-union efforts is coming out, thanks to a ruling by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

    Alphabet and Google employees formed a union in January 2021, but it wasn’t without some coordinated interference on the part of the company. According to Motherboard, an NLRB ruling revealed documents that disclosed the existence of Project Vivian.

    According to the documents, Michael Pfyl, Google’s director of employment law, said Project Vivian’s objective was “to engage employees more positively and convince them that unions suck.”

    The judge in the NLRB case also described evidence in which a Google attorney proposed using a “respected voice to publish an OpEd outlining what a unionized tech workplace would look like, and counseling employees of FB (Facebook), MSFT(Microsoft), Amazon, and google (sic) not to do it.”

    In response to the proposal, Google’s HR director, Kara Silverstein, said the company would need to be careful that “there would be no fingerprints and not Google specific.”

    According to the NLRB, in the US “it is unlawful for an employer to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of their rights.”

    Even if Google didn’t technically break the law, it’s not helping its reputation any. The company has already refused to release 180 documents to the attorney representing four fired employees, employees that organized against the company. It appears Google is even going so far as to defy a judge’s order pertaining to the release of the documents.

  • Amazon Required to Email 1 M Employees About Their Right to Organize

    Amazon Required to Email 1 M Employees About Their Right to Organize

    Amazon has reached a settlement with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requiring the company to email employees about organizing.

    Amazon has drawn ongoing criticism for how it deals with employee efforts to unionize. The company has hired Pinkerton detectives to keep tabs on unionization efforts, and has been accused of bullying workers and violating labor laws at an Alabama warehouse in the lead-up to a vote on unionization.

    According to Business Insider, Amazon has reached a settlement with the NLRB, and one of the stipulations is that it must email approximately 1 million employees to inform them of their right to organize.

    The Teamsters had already created a division specifically tasked with helping Amazon workers successfully unionize. With the NLRB settlement, the tide may finally be turning against the e-commerce giant and its efforts to fight unionization.

  • Teamsters Vote to Prioritize Unionizing Amazon Workers

    Teamsters Vote to Prioritize Unionizing Amazon Workers

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters has voted to create a division specifically tasked with assisting Amazon workers.

    Amazon has been the target of increased unionization efforts, efforts which the company has pulled out all the stops to combat. The Teamsters already represent 1.4 million delivery drivers and have been vocal opponents of Amazon’s anti-union tactics.

    The union voted Thursday to create a special division to help workers in Amazon’s logistics businesses, including delivery drivers and warehouse workers. “Special Resolution: Building Worker Power at Amazon” passed with overwhelming support, with 1,562 votes in favor and only nine opposed, according to NBC News.

    “Amazon presents a massive threat to working-class communities and good jobs in the logistics industry,” Randy Korgan, the Teamsters National Director for Amazon, said. “Amazon workers face dehumanizing, unsafe and low-pay jobs, with high turnover and no voice at work.”

    “Amazon workers are calling for safer and better working conditions and with today’s resolution we are activating the full force of our union to support them,” Korgan added.

    Only time will tell if the Teamsters’ efforts will be successful, but the timing is sure to put additional pressure on Amazon as it faces increased regulatory scrutiny.

  • Teamsters May Set Their Sights on Amazon

    Teamsters May Set Their Sights on Amazon

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters may take on Amazon at a time when the company is aggressively combating unionization efforts.

    The Teamsters are the most well-known union in the US, with a long and storied history. The group also boasts some 1.4 million delivery drivers, putting it on a collision course with Amazon.

    Amazon has drawn significant criticism in recent years for its treatment of its workers, including delivery drivers. As recently as February, the company settled with the FTC for some $62 million dollars over its practice of illegally withholding tips from its drivers.

    The company has aggressively fought unionization efforts by its employees, however, successfully defeating an effort by warehouse workers in Alabama. The Teamsters have already come out swinging against the e-commerce giant, urging the House Judiciary to pass antitrust legislation that would target Amazon.

    On Thursday, the union will vote on whether to make unionizing Amazon drivers its top priority, according to The Seattle Times.

    “There is no clearer example of how America is failing the working class than Amazon,” says the resolution that will be voted on.

  • Amazon Workers Vote No to Unionization

    Amazon Workers Vote No to Unionization

    Amazon has scored a big win in Alabama, as workers voted not to unionize in the biggest unionization push the company has seen in the US.

    Workers at the company’s Bessemer, Alabama warehouse began the process of setting up a union vote earlier this year. Amazon immediately began a full-court press initiative to discourage those efforts, including go so far as to put propaganda in bathroom stalls.

    It appears the company’s efforts were successful, as NPR is reporting the employees have voted not to unionize. The union is filing a legal challenge to the results, and wants a hearing with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The union wants the NLRB “to determine if the results of the election should be set aside because conduct by the employer created an atmosphere of confusion, coercion and/or fear of reprisals and thus interfered with the employees’ freedom of choice.”

    In addition to the bathroom propaganda, Amazon bombarded workers with anti-union text messages and mandatory “information sessions.” A mailbox that was supposed to provide a “convenient, safe and private” place to vote was placed inside an Amazon tent, a move many felt was further intimidation. Similarly, the company asked the county to shorten the timing of the traffic light outside the warehouse. Pro-union organizers believed it was to prevent them from being able to talk to workers sitting in traffic, while Amazon says it was standard practice during holiday and peak season.

    Whatever the case, it appears Amazon’s fight over unionization is far from over. Given the company’s aggressive tactics, tactics that caused its own investors to tell it to back down, the company may have won this battle at the cost of the war.

  • Investors Urging Amazon to Stop Pressuring Workers On Unionization

    Investors Urging Amazon to Stop Pressuring Workers On Unionization

    Investors are reportedly urging Amazon to stop pressuring workers amid the first-ever vote on unionization by the company’s workers.

    Amazon is notoriously anti-union, even going so far as to hire Pinkerton detectives to monitor and impede unionization efforts. The company has also been accused of illegally firing individuals who supported organizing. Most recently, Amazon has made waves with employees, pressuring workers in Bessemer, Alabama to vote against unionization.

    According to The Financial Times, via Bloomberg, some of Amazon’s investors have had enough, urging the company to stop interfering with unionization efforts. The group is made up of more than 70 investors, collectively holding some $20 billion of the company’s shares. The comptrollers for the state of New York and New York City, BMO Global Asset Management, Sweden-based Folksam and Ohman Fonder, as well as the Church of England Pensions Board are just a few of the investors in question.

    “As these workers seek to organize with [the union] for health, safety, and protection, Amazon’s investors are watching,” New York City comptroller Scott Stringer said, according to the FT. “There is power in their unity and power in labour, and they have my full support as they fight for a safe, fair workplace.”

    The investor backlash is just the latest setback Amazon has faced, due to its dealings with employees. The company recently settled a case with the FTC over stealing some $62 million in tips from its Flex drivers. If the company doesn’t make some major changes, it will likely continue to face fallout and backlash from employees, lawmakers and investors alike.