WebProNews

Tag: Timnit Gebru

  • Google AI Chief Ignites Firestorm Over ‘Marginalized Groups’ Tweet

    Google AI Chief Ignites Firestorm Over ‘Marginalized Groups’ Tweet

    Google AI Chief Jeff Dean ignited a firestorm of comments on Twitter by inviting “marginalized groups” to work with Google researchers.

    Jeff Dean was at the center of the controversial firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru, a world-renowned AI ethics researcher in late 2020. At the time, Google tried to pass the situation off as Gebru resigning, but she and her team made it clear she had been fired, over an issue of academic integrity. Gebru had co-authorized a paper highlighting the dangers of certain times of AI, including the type Google regularly uses. Gebru’s co-lead, Margaret Mitchell, was fired some time later, after her outspoken support for her colleague.

    Google has already faced severe backlash for its actions. Multiple researchers and engineers have quit, independent researchers have started turning down the company’s funding, the company was removed as a sponsor for a high-profile AI conference and its remaining researchers have petitioned the company to respect academic integrity, one of the pivotal points of contention leading to Gebru’s exit.

    With such a background, it’s hard to fathom what Dean was thinking with his recent tweet, in which he said:

    I encourage students from historically marginalized groups who are interested in learning to conduct research in AI/ML, CS or related areas to consider applying for our CSRMP mentorship program! We have 100s of researchers @GoogleAI who are excited to work with you.

    Needless to say, the reaction was swift and severe, with many Twitter users asking how he could possibly expect marginalized groups to trust Google after its actions. The criticism is especially notable since the company is accused of marginalizing a Black woman, and never taking responsibility, let alone attempting to fix it.

    The backlash appears to have been swift enough to cause Dean to remove his tweet, as it is no longer available at time of writing. 

    Google’s mishandling of this situation continues to be an astounding case study of what not to do.

  • Apple Snaps Up Google AI Scientist Who Resigned Over Handling of AI Team

    Apple Snaps Up Google AI Scientist Who Resigned Over Handling of AI Team

    Apple has scored a big win, hiring Samy Bengio after he resigned from Google following the firing of Google’s AI ethics team leaders.

    Google landed in hot water after the controversial firings of Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell. Google was accused of interfering with academic integrity and criticized for its treatment of women and Black employees.

    In the wake of the incidents, some engineers departed the company, citing its handling of the entire situation. Sammy Bengio, however, was the most high-profile departure. As a 14-year veteran of the company, and one of the earliest involved in Google Brain, his departure was seen as a real blow to the company, according to Reuters.

    Google’s loss is Apple gain, as the Cupertino company has hired Bengio. Reuters reports Bengio will be leading a new AI research unit under John Giannandrea, senior vice president of machine learning and AI strategy.

    Despite being first to the market with its Siri virtual assistant, Apple has fallen behind Google and Amazon. It’s a safe bet Bengio’s new role will lead to significant, and much-needed, improvements for Siri. His work may also contribute to Apple’s other projects, including the AI component in the upcoming Apple Car.

  • Nothing to See Here: Google Glosses Over AI Troubles With New Lead

    Nothing to See Here: Google Glosses Over AI Troubles With New Lead

    Google has appointed a new head of its responsible AI research in the wake of the high-profile firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru and action against Margaret Mitchell.

    Google has went from one bad decision to another with its AI team. Things started when the company fired Dr. Timnit Gebru, all the while claiming she resigned. At the heart of the issue was the company taking exception with a research paper Gebru had co-authored that was critical of some of the AI Google uses.

    Gebru’s firing was met with condemnation, both form inside and outside the company. CEO Sundar Pichai sent an email to Google employees that was widely criticized as being tone-deaf and failing to address the underlying issues.

    The company then took action against Margaret Mitchell, locking out her access. Mitchell had been a vocal supporter of Gebru and voiced her own criticism of Google’s actions. Multiple engineers have since quit, citing the company’s dealings with Gebru Mitchell as the reason.

    Google seems eager to put the whole fiasco behind it, and has appointed Dr. Marian Croak to lead its responsible AI research division. Unfortunately for the company, Croak’s appointment is being seen as another example of being tone-deaf. Since Croak is a Black woman, her appointment is being taken as a transparent way to dismiss accusations of misogyny and racism…by putting a Black woman in charge of Gebru’s team.

    Gebru also voiced her frustration that a Black woman was participating in the legitimization of Google’s actions.

    In our initial coverage of this situation we said: “It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation.”

    It’s amazing that, two and a half months later, the company is continuing to demonstrate what not to do.

  • Google Moving Against Second AI Ethics Researcher

    Google Moving Against Second AI Ethics Researcher

    Still mired in controversy over its firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru, Google appears to be repeating history with Margaret Mitchell, its Ethics AI lead.

    Google drew widespread condemnation from critics inside and outside the company for its firing of Dr. Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers. Gebru was forced out following the publication of a paper critical of some of the AI technology Google uses in its products. Google says Gebru resigned, but both Gebru and her team say she was fired after demands she retract the paper.

    The incident prompted CEO Sundar Pichai to send an email to employees, apologizing for what happened and promising the company would do better in the future.

    It would appear that promise may be short-lived, as Google is now taking action against Mitchell. Gebru tweeted the news on Tuesday.

    VentureBeat reached out to Google and received the following statement:

    Our security systems automatically lock an employee’s corporate account when they detect that the account is at risk of compromise due to credential problems or when an automated rule involving the handling of sensitive data has been triggered. In this instance, yesterday our systems detected that an account had exfiltrated thousands of files and shared them with multiple external accounts. We explained this to the employee earlier today. We are actively investigating this matter as part of standard procedures to gather additional details.

    Mitchell has been a vocal critic of Google’s handling of Gebru’s termination, tweeting the following just five hours before Gebru tweeted about the action taken against her:

    One big point of contention is the integrity of the research performed by Google’s scientists and researchers. In an email to Google’s leadership, the company’s AI researchers emphasized what’s at stake:

    Google’s short-sighted decision to fire and retaliate against a core member of the Ethical AI team makes it clear that we need swift and structural changes if this work is to continue, and if the legitimacy of the field as a whole is to persevere.

    This research must be able to contest the company’s short-term interests and immediate revenue agendas, as well as to investigate AI that is deployed by Google’s competitors with similar ethical motives.

    Unfortunately, those concerns seem to have fallen on deaf ears. That letter was sent in mid-December. In late December, however, Google told researchers to “take great care to strike a positive tone” on “sensitive topics,” such as as AI, according to an email obtained by Reuters.

    With Margaret Mitchell, the company’s Ethical AI lead, now potentially on the chopping block, Google is on the verge of losing all credibility among AI researchers.

  • Google AI Researchers Cite Demands, Want Academic Integrity

    Google AI Researchers Cite Demands, Want Academic Integrity

    Google is experiencing more fallout from its handling of Dr. Timnit Gebru’s dismissal, with the company’s AI researchers making demands.

    The company was cast in the spotlight when news broke that Dr. Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers had left the company. Google claimed Gebru had resigned, but she and her coworkers say she was fired.

    Much of the issue stemmed from Gebru and her fellow researchers authoring a paper that raised concerns about the kind of AI Google uses in a number of projects. The controversy led CEO Sundar Pichai to apologize for how the situation was handled, although even the apology drew criticism for being tone-deaf, both from those inside and outside the company.

    AI researchers within the company are now demanding changes, according to an email seen by Bloomberg. One such demand is that a company vice president, Megan Kacholia, be removed from the reporting chain. The researches said they had “lost trust in her as a leader.”

    The researches also demanded the freedom to pursue research, even if it conflicted with Google’s short-term interests.

    “Google’s short-sighted decision to fire and retaliate against a core member of the Ethical AI team makes it clear that we need swift and structural changes if this work is to continue, and if the legitimacy of the field as a whole is to persevere,” the letter reads.

    “This research must be able to contest the company’s short-term interests and immediate revenue agendas, as well as to investigate AI that is deployed by Google’s competitors with similar ethical motives,” the researchers added.

    Google’s response could have profound impacts on the company’s AI endeavors moving forward. Although it is one of the leading companies in the field, if Google loses the respect of the AI community, it could quickly find itself struggling to attract top talent — especially if that talent has legitimate reason to believe it will be censored.

  • Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Sundar Pichai has sent an email to Google employees in an effort to address backlash the company is facing over Dr. Timnit Gebru’s exit.

    Timnit Gebru is one of the leading artificial intelligence ethics researcher in the world, widely respected for her expertise. An issue arose as a result of a research paper Gebru and other researchers were working on. The paper tackled the ethical issues with large-scale AI language models (LLMs), and was approved internally on October 8. According to Gebru, she was later asked to remove her name from the paper because an internal review found it to be objectionable.

    As Gebru later pointed out in an interview with Wiredresearchers must be free to go where the research takes them.

    You’re not going to have papers that make the company happy all the time and don’t point out problems. That’s antithetical to what it means to be that kind of researcher.

    Google’s head of AI, Jeff Dean, said the paper was not submitted with the necessary two-week lead time. Gebru’s team, however, wrote in a blog post supporting Gebru that “this is a standard which was applied unevenly and discriminatorily.”

    As a result, Gebru gave her supervisors some conditions she wanted met, otherwise she would work toward an amicable exit from the company. According to her team, the conditions “were for 1) transparency around who was involved in calling for the retraction of the paper, 2) having a series of meetings with the Ethical AI team, and 3) understanding the parameters of what would be acceptable research at Google.”

    Instead of working with Gebru, her supervisors accepted her “resignation” effective immediately. Gebru’s team is quick to point out that “Dr. Gebru did not resign,” (italics theirs) and was instead terminated.

    The company’s actions brought swift and vocal backlash. Some 2,351 Googlers, along with 3,729 supporters in academia, industry and civil society have signed a petition in support of Gebru at the time of writing. It seems Pichai and Company realize the situation is not going away without being addressed.

    In an email to employees, first published by Axios, Pichai attempted to do damage control, apologizing for what happened and vowing to do better in the future.

    So far, the email has not been met with praise. Gebru took to Twitter to criticize the lack of accountability, as well as the insinuation she was an “angry Black woman” for whom a de-escalation strategy was needed.

    Similarly, others are criticizing Pichai’s email for essentially being tone-deaf. Jack Clark, Open AIPolicy Director, is one such voice.

    In our initial coverage of this situation, we stated: “It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation.”

    In the aftermath of Pichai’s email, that statement continues to ring true.

    Here’s the email in full:

    Hi everyone,

    One of the things I’ve been most proud of this year is how Googlers from across the company came together to address our racial equity commitments. It’s hard, important work, and while we’re steadfast in our commitment to do better, we have a lot to learn and improve. An important piece of this is learning from our experiences like the departure of Dr. Timnit Gebru.

    I’ve heard the reaction to Dr. Gebru’s departure loud and clear: it seeded doubts and led some in our community to question their place at Google. I want to say how sorry I am for that, and I accept the responsibility of working to restore your trust.

    First – we need to assess the circumstances that led up to Dr. Gebru’s departure, examining where we could have improved and led a more respectful process. We will begin a review of what happened to identify all the points where we can learn — considering everything from de-escalation strategies to new processes we can put in place. Jeff and I have spoken and are fully committed to doing this. One of the best aspects of Google’s engineering culture is our sincere desire to understand where things go wrong and how we can improve.

    Second – we need to accept responsibility for the fact that a prominent Black, female leader with immense talent left Google unhappily. This loss has had a ripple effect through some of our least represented communities, who saw themselves and some of their experiences reflected in Dr. Gebru’s. It was also keenly felt because Dr. Gebru is an expert in an important area of AI Ethics that we must continue to make progress on — progress that depends on our ability to ask ourselves challenging questions.

    It’s incredibly important to me that our Black, women, and underrepresented Googlers know that we value you and you do belong at Google. And the burden of pushing us to do better should not fall on your shoulders. We started a conversation together earlier this year when we announced a broad set of racial equity commitments to take a fresh look at all of our systems from hiring and leveling, to promotion and retention, and to address the need for leadership accountability across all of these steps. The events of the last week are a painful but important reminder of the progress we still need to make.

    This is a top priority for me and Google leads, and I want to recommit to translating the energy that we’ve seen this year into real change as we move forward into 2021 and beyond.

    — Sundar

  • Amazon Accused of Illegally Firing Employee Over Working Conditions

    Amazon Accused of Illegally Firing Employee Over Working Conditions

    The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has accused Amazon of illegally firing an employee advocating for better working conditions.

    On the heels of news the NLRB accused Google of illegally spying on and firing employees, not to mention its firing of Timnit Gebru, Amazon is now in hot water too.

    Amazon has already made headlines for aggressively working against unionization efforts, even going so far as to hire Pinkertons to monitor employees suspected of organizing. At least six employees claim they were fired in the spring over their efforts to improve working conditions.

    According to BuzzFeed News, however, the NLRB has found that one of those employees, Courtney Bowden, has a legitimate case. In fact, “the agency found merit in her allegations that Amazon threatened, suspended, and ultimately terminated her because she had been talking with coworkers at an Amazon warehouse in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, about pay and other workplace issues, which is a legally protected activity.” At least one of those issues was providing sick pay for part-time employees.

    The case will now go before an administrative law judge March 9, 2021. Given Amazon’s history, its recent actions and the NLRB’s findings, it seems likely the judge may find in Bowden’s favor.

    Either way, this has not been a good week for Big Tech and employee relations.

  • Google In Hot Water After Firing High-Profile AI Researcher

    Google In Hot Water After Firing High-Profile AI Researcher

    Google is facing major backlash after firing Dr. Timnit Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers.

    Google has already been accused by the National Labor Relations Board of spying on and terminating employees unlawfully. The accusation stems from the company’s efforts to discourage unionization.

    Now the company has fired Timnit Gebru, a leading, well-respected researcher specializing in AI ethics. Gebru announced her firing via Twitter:

    As Gebru points out, and as Google has stated, the company says it fired her for sending an email to employees in the Bain group, an email that was “inconsistent with the expectations of a Google manager.”

    At the heart of the issue was a research paper Gebru was working on, a paper that received pushback. Gebru provided conditions that she asked Google to meet—in regard to the paper she was working on—otherwise she planned to resign. Rather than negotiate, the company simply accepted her resignation immediately, effectively firing her.

    At the same time, Jeff Dean, the head of Google research, sent out a lengthy email to Google employees explaining why the company chose to fire Gebru. The company blamed its actions on Gebru’s email to the Bain group, in which she detailed the struggles she had experienced as a Black women at the company. Gebru’s email to the Bain group, as well as Dean’s response can be read here.

    It appears Google’s employees aren’t buying the company’s line, not surprising given how well respected Gebru is. To date, over 1,000 people have signed a petition in support of her. In addition, Dr. Alex Hanna, also a Google AI ethics researcher, called out the company for its “chilling” actions against Gebru:

    It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation. Given the scrutiny the company is under, this is certainly not going to help their case.