WebProNews

Tag: The Royal Wedding

  • Researchers Track British Mood With Twitter

    Researchers in the Intelligent Systems Laboratory at the University of Bristol have presented a paper in which they track the national mood of the United Kingdom through Twitter posts. This is not the first, or even the largest, study to track public mood swings using Twitter. This study, however, is interesting because it specifically shows the increasing public anger leading up the the riots that erupted last year.

    The study looked at 484 million tweets by more than 9.8 million users over a period of 31 months. The study covers the timeframe from July of 2009 to January of this year. Over the course of the last two years the UK has faced three major events: the budget cuts announcement from October 2010, the royal wedding of Prince William in Aprill 2011, and the riots in August 2011.

    From the study abstract:

    Our findings, besides corroborating our choice of method for the detection of public mood, also present intriguing patterns that can be explained in terms of events and social changes. On the one hand, the time series we obtain show that periodic events such as Christmas and Halloween evoke similar mood patterns every year. On the other hand, we see that a significant increase in negative mood indicators coincide with the announcement of the cuts to public spending by the government, and that this effect is still lasting. We also detect events such as the riots of summer 2011, as well as a possible calming effect coinciding with the run up to the royal wedding.

    The study captured standard public mood measurements, such as sadness peaking on Halloween and Joy peaking on Christmas. However, the study captured something I find interesting about the mood of the British public around the time of the riots last year. In the month leading up to the riots, anger can be seen spiking heavily, and the riots are followed by a cathartic lowering of anger. The odd part is that fear during the riots did not have nearly as significant a rise as did anger. Fear did match anger, though, when the budget cuts were announced in October 2010. This suggests to me that the British public fears poverty more than London or Manchester being on fire, but I, like the authors of the study, leave such interpretations to social scientists.

    The study was presented at the Workshop on Social Media Applications in News and Entertainment being held in Lyon, France. The workshop is co-located with the World Wide Web 2012 conference. The authors of the study are Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, Vasileios Lampos, and Nello Cristianini.

  • The Royal Wedding Coverage Volume Highest in U.S.

    “The kind of historic event that only happens once in a generation – the storybook marriage between an anachronistic fascination with the descendants of some very lucky German hemophiliacs and ubiquitous 21st century media hypercoverage.” – Jon Stewart, 4/25/11

    If you are an American and want to hear less about the upcoming Royal Wedding, then it might be better for you to go to the U.K.  Seriously.  Apparently their media coverage of the event is not as aggressive as it is here in the States.

    Say what?

    That’s right, according to a post on the Nielsen blog,  the American news media is covering the Royal Wedding at a higher clip than the Brits.  Since the November 2010 engagement announcement, royal wedding coverage has totaled about .3% of all American news.  This share from traditional media sources is higher than the shares in the U.K. and Australia, combined.

    Now, this statistic isn’t shocking to anyone who frequently watches CNN or other major news outlets here in the States.  Watching many stations, I can’t help but feel like they have decided that the real news is simply too depressing and bleak, so they’re just going to go with fancy British wedding stuff instead.  Sounds like a plan.

    This Nielsen report also includes traditional media online sources from newspapers and magazines.  They studied “buzz factor” from social media outlets as well and found this:

    The study of buzz on social media (blogs, message boards/groups) and traditional media finds that while the United Kingdom creates the greater overall level of consumer buzz about the Royal Wedding, the United States has the highest share of news coverage by traditional news sources, such as the online versions of newspapers and magazines.

    Here is this info in fun convenient graph form:

    The Royal Wedding fever has led to popular websites providing special content and unique pages dedicated entirely to the event.  Earlier this month Yahoo launched a Royal Wedding site with photo galleries, streaming video and a guestbook.  YouTube also announced that they will we streaming the entire event live from their official Royal Wedding channel.  It looks like America has a fever, and the only prescription is more coverage of British socialites.  Or a Kardashian could do something drastic.  That might shift the news cycles.

    Now this isn’t to say that Royal fans in the U.K. aren’t crazy about the wedding.  Remember that thing I said earlier about “Buzz factor?”  Yeah, how’s this for buzz:

    @BritishMonarchy is now officially on Twitter as well, and it is tweeting about the upcoming wedding.  It currently has over 130,000 followers.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8msHZ8wI7Y The Archbishop of Canterbury on the Royal Wedding, speaking in a film produced by Lambeth Palace. 1 day ago via Royal Household · powered by @socialditto

    The Royal Wedding is set for this Friday, April 29th.