WebProNews

Tag: SMX Advanced

  • Mobile Site Speed To Be A Google Ranking Factor?

    Google has clearly had it with sites that have lackluster mobile experiences. This week, the company took to its Webmater Central blog to discuss “several ranking changes” it’s preparing for sites not configured for smartphone users.

    But that’s not all.

    Google’s Matt Cutts spoke at SMX Advanced on Tuesday evening, and implied that Google might roll out a version of its site speed ranking factor for mobile sites. Google officially revealed that site speed was a ranking factor for search over three years ago after placing a great deal of emphasis on speed for quite some time before that.

    Fast forward to 2013, and mobile has grown a lot. Google is making it so you have no excuse to treat your mobile content with less regard than your desktop content. Frankly, sites should be optimizing for mobile anyway, simply for the benefit of their users, but if ignoring the mobile experience is going to cost sites search rankings, perhaps this will light a fire under their butts to do something about poor mobile site performance.

    Here’s the relevant section of Search Engine Land’s liveblogged account of what Cutts said about mobile page speed:

    At Google I/O, there was a session on instant mobile websites – there were page speed recommendations. We’ve said that before about desktop sites, we might start doing the same thing about mobile websites.

    By the way, Cutts said at the event that the smartphone-related changes discussed in the blog post have been approved, but that he’s not sure when they’ll roll out.

  • Google Tests Structured Data Error Reporting In Webmaster Tools

    Google’s Matt Cutts revealed in a Q&A at SMX Advanced on Tuesday night that Google is rolling out a test of a “structured data dashboard,” according to Search Engine Land. Barry Schwartz writes that he announced “a new beta application is testing within Google Webmaster Tools named the Structured Data Dashboard”.

    Google actually announced the launch of the Structured Data Dashboard in Webmaster Tools last July. Our coverage of that is here.

    Search Engine Land provides a link the an application for those who want to test the new tool. It appears that the test is just for “structured data error reporting”.

    Error Reporting

    Presumably, this is part of the dashboard announced last year.

    A couple weeks ago, Google launched some new tools for webmasters to provide it with structured data from their sites. They added support for new types of data with the Data Highlighter and launched the Structured Data Markup Helper.

  • Google: We Haven’t Updated Panda For A Month And A Half

    Back in March, Google launched a Panda refresh. This is something they’ve done numerous times since first launching the update back in early 2011. There was something special about this particular refresh, however, because it marked the beginning of a new era of Panda in which Google will keep the update going regularly, without announcing all the refreshes.

    “Rather than having some huge change that happens on a given day. You are more likely in the future to see Panda deployed gradually as we rebuild the index. So you are less likely to see these large scale sorts of changes,” Google’s Matt Cutts was quoted as saying.

    Matt Cutts appeared in a discussion at SMX Advanced Tuesday evening in which he spoke a bit about Panda, among many other things.

    Interviewer Danny Sullivan asked Cutts how many Panda updates there have been since Google stopped confirming them. His response was that they had one about a month and a half ago, but hadn’t updated it since then because they’re looking at pulling in a new signal that might help some people out of the gray zone.

    This brings to mind recent words from Cutts in an industry-famous video in which he discussed numerous upcoming changes.

    In that, Cutts talked about Google changing its update strategy for Panda. “We’ve also been looking at Panda, and seeing if we can find some additional signals (and we think we’ve got some) to help refine things for the sites that are kind of in the border zone – in the gray area a little bit. And so if we can soften the effect a little bit for those sites that we believe have some additional signals of quality, then that will help sites that have previously been affected (to some degree) by Panda.”

    Panda will apparently be updated about once a month, and roll out slowly throughout the month.

    “What happens is Google will run the update on a particular day, let’s say on the 4th of the month,” explains Barry Schwartz from SMX sister site, Search Engine Land. “Then Google will slowly push out that impact over 10 days or so through the month. Google will typically repeat this cycle over monthly.”

    Hat tip to Matt McGee for liveblogging the discussion.

  • Here’s The Matt Cutts Discussion From SMX Advanced

    Matt Cutts participated in a Q&A session with Danny Sullivan at the SMX Advanced conference. SMX has now made the video available to all via its YouTube channel, so if you couldn’t make the conference, here you go:

    Cutts discusses a variety of things during the session, but he also announced that Google is now rolling out a new algorithm update focusing on spammy queries like “payday loans”. More on that here.

  • Matt Cutts: Nofollow Links Are Small, Single Digit Percentage Of Links On The Web

    Google’s Matt Cutts recently downplayed the significance of social signals in search, compared to links. Search Marketing Expo uploaded a new video to YouTube, featuring a discussion between Cutts and moderator Danny Sullivan, in which he talks about the notion that social signals have replaced links. In short, while social signals may gain power in time, links are still pretty important.

    “If you look at the library of congress, they say they have 151.4 million items,” says Cutts. “That’s roughly 34 million books, and if you convert that to just pure text like OCR, that’s something like ten terabytes. The web capture team at the library of congress says they have 235 terabytes. Now everybody in this room probably ought to be saying to themselves: 235 terabytes for the largest library in the world is not that much data. YouTube gets 72 hours of video uploaded every minute. So the web is the largest source of data we’ve ever seen before.”

    “There’s more data being generated on the web, compared to any other source of data around the web, and I think, the fact is, a lot of people think, ‘Links are dying,’ or ‘Links are not a democracy,’ or ‘It’s impossible to get links that aren’t nofollow,’ or whatever,” says Cutts. “And the fact is, that’s a little bit of a bubble in my opinion, in the SEO industry, because if you look at the actual percentage of Nofollow links on the web, it’s a single digit percentage. In fact, it’s a pretty small single digit percentage. So there’s this perception that, ‘Yes, everything will go social,’ or ‘Links are completely obsolete,’ and I think it’s premature to reach that conclusion.”

    “I don’t doubt that in ten years, things will be more social, and those will be more powerful signals, but I wouldn’t write the epitaph for links quite yet,” he adds.

    You would think that social signals are pretty damn important, looking at Google’s results on any given day, if you’re using Search Plus Your World (and there’s a good chance you are, as it’s the default experience for signed in users). How often have you seen results appear simply because someone you’re connected to through Google+ has +1’d something?

    I don’t necessarily think social is the best indicator of relevance, as I’ve discussed in the past, but I do believe they can carry a lot of weight, and perhaps more importantly, will help you diversify your traffic sources, and not have to depend on the search giant for so much of your traffic.

  • Google Will Soon Ignore Links You Tell It To

    Google’s Matt Cutts gave a keynote “You and A” presentation at SMX Advanced this week, and mentioned that Google is considering offering a tool that would let webmasters disavow certain links.

    Would you find such a tool useful? Let us know in the comments.

    Matt McGee at SMX sister site Search Engine Land liveblogged the conversation. Here’s his quote of Cutts, which was in response to a question about negative SEO:

    The story of this year has been more transparency, but we’re also trying to be better about enforcing our quality guidelines. People have asked questions about negative SEO for a long time. Our guidelines used to say it’s nearly impossible to do that, but there have been cases where that’s happened, so we changed the wording on that part of our guidelines.

    Some have suggested that Google could disavow links. Even though we put in a lot of protection against negative SEO, there’s been so much talk about that that we’re talking about being able to enable that, maybe in a month or two or three.

    We recently wrote about Google’s wording change regarding negative SEO, which seemed to be an admission from the company that this practice is indeed possible. These words from Cutts seem to be further confirmation.

    Rand Fishkin, CEO of SEOmoz, recently issued a challenge to people to show that if you have a strong enough reputation and link profile, you can’t be hurt by negative SEO. That seemed to go pretty well, but not everyone has the reputation of SEOmoz, even if they don’t necessarily have a bad one. Such a tool from Google could go a long way in helping combat negative SEO practices.

    As far as people suggesting that Google could disavow links, Search Engine Land editor Barry Schwartz actually had a pretty good article talking about this last month. “The concept is simple,” he wrote. “You go to your link report in Google Webmaster Tools and have an action button that says ‘don’t trust this link’ or something like it. Google will then take that as a signal to not use that link as part of their link graph and ranking algorithm.”

    “What I can’t understand is why hasn’t Google released it yet,” he wrote. “It is a great way for Google to do mass spam reporting by webmasters and SEOs without calling it spam reporting. You will have all these webmasters rush after a penalty to call out which links they feel are hurting them. Google can take that data to back up their algorithms to on links they already know are spam but also find new links that they might not have caught.”

    He went on to make the point that Google would find more spam this way.

    Once Google launches this tool, assuming that it actually does, it will be very interesting to see how the rankings shake out. It should be an indication of just how important links actually are these days.

    As you may know, Google has sent out a ton of Webmaster Tools warnings this year, and such a tool would help users take quick “manual action” on links rather than spend a ton of time sending link removal requests to other sites. It might even prevent some lawsuits (and the death of the web as we know it).

    According to Cutts, however, not many of the warnings were actually about links.

     

    @VegasWill that’s the right range. I may pull the stats just to help clarify.
    6 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Update: Here’s his clarification:

    Matt Cutts
    Matt Cutts   15 minutes ago Earlier this year, Google revealed that we sent out over 700,000 messages to site owners in January and February 2012 via our free webmaster console at http://google.com/webmasters . I wanted to clarify a misconception about those messages. A lot of people assumed that most or all of the 700K messages were related to "unnatural link warnings" that some site owners received.

    The reason for sending the 700,000 messages via Webmaster Tools was actually because we started sending out warnings about blackhat techniques. The vast, vast majority of manual actions we take are on pages that are engaging in egregious blackhat SEO techniques, such as automatically created gibberish or cloaking.

    In fact, of the messages that we sent out to site owners, only around 3% were for unnatural or artificial links. So just to be clear, of the 700,000 messages we sent out in January and February, well above 600,000 were for obvious blackhat spam, and under 25,000 of the messages were for unnatural links. #smx   #seo  


    Google Sent Over 700,000 Messages Via Webmaster Tools In Past Two Months
    At SMX West last week Tiffany Oberoi from Google shared that Google has sent over 700,000 messages to webmasters via Google Webmaster Tools in January and February 2012. That is more than the total nu…

    By the way, Google only sends those messages when it’s a penalty, and penalties, as far as Google is concerned, are manual action.

    It will be interesting to see if the new link tool helps a lot of sites recover from algorithm updates like Penguin, and/or prevents a lot of sites from getting hit. Will we see less complaining about Google’s algorithm changes? Somehow, I doubt that. I have no reason to believe we will see less finger pointing.

    Will you use the new link tool if Google provides it? Let us know in the comments.

  • Matt Cutts Gives An Update On Penguin

    Googe’s Matt Cutts participated in a keynote discussion at SMX Advanced, and as you might have guess, the topics of Google’s Penguin and Panda updates came up more than once.

    Matt McGee liveblogged the event for the SMX-affiliated Search Engine Land, and quoted Cutts throughout. Cutts also answered a bunch of questions on Twitter, so some of those tweets will be sprinkled throughout this article.

    The first question was about Penguin. According to this liveblogged account, Cutts said, “We look at it something designed to tackle low-quality content. It started out with Panda, and then we noticed that there was still a lot of spam and Penguin was designed to tackle that. It’s an algorithmic change, but when we use a word like ‘penalty,’ we’re talking about a manual action taken by the web spam team — it wasn’t that.”

     

    @dyksta algo changes can result in abrupt drops, b/c an algo can be launched quickly. To differentiate, check for manual action in console.
    6 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    When asked if Google just did another Penguin update, Cutts said, “No.”

     

    @damienpetitjean no Panda or Penguin updates going out recently, no.
    7 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Cutts does say both Penguin and Panda will happen on nearly a monthly basis:

     

    @GaryLHenderson and that’s a ballpark estimate, but it’s held pretty true for Panda data updates for example.
    6 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Cutts also confirmed that WPMU.org recovered because of the Penguin update, and the site’s cleaning up. He says there’s no white list with Penguin (or Panda).

     

    @RossHudgens and the more general statement is that there is no whitelist for Penguin, just as there is no whitelist for Panda.
    6 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    He also said, “WPMU had a pretty good number of links from lower quality sites.”

    Some comments Cutts made in the past about starting over with your site if you were hit by Penguin, scared some, but this was brought up again during the keynote. “Sometimes you should. It’s possible to recover, but if you’re a fly-by-night spammer, it might be better to start over,” he’s quoted as saying.

     

    @AndyBeal I think the site that set the record most recently had nine completely different things that we flagged on it. Sheesh. cc @jenstar
    7 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

     

    @thompsonpaul I take care of the penguin and he takes care of lots of search results 🙂
    7 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

  • Matt Cutts: Google Doesn’t Use Bounce Rate

    Matt Cutts: Google Doesn’t Use Bounce Rate

    There’s been a lot of talk over the years (especially post Panda update) about whether or not Google uses bounce rate as a ranking signal. In fact, even this morning at SMX Advanced in the SEO Periodic Table session, the topic came up. Here are a couple of tweets from an attendee of that session:

    Bounce rates probably aren’t factored either. Doesn’t mean they aren’t important for UX @markmunroe #smx #11a
    4 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Overall bounce rate may not be important. But Google sure knows when users immediately go back to Google from your site #smx #11a
    4 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Apparently, Google’s Matt Cutts said flat out (via second-hand news) that Google does not use Bounce Rate. Danny Sullivan just tweeted:

    “Google doesn’t use bounce rate” @mattcutts told @tomschmitz yesterday, tom says #smx #11c
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Common thinking seems to have been that bounce rate is not a ranking signal, but this could help put a stop (or at least add a major point of argument) to the debate.

  • SMX Advanced: The Mad Scientists Of Paid Search [Takeaways In Tweets]

    Following the “Periodic Table of SEO” session at SMX Advanced today, was the Mad Scientists of Paid Search session.

    SMX’s description of the session says, “Our mad scientists emerge from their PPC labs, where they’ve been assembling keywords words, bidding strategies and other assorted parts into monster PPC campaigns. Attend this session to see how they’ve successfully enhanced paid search performance with rigorous testing and trial and error. Their creations are abnormally effective!”

    The speakers list was as follows:

    Moderator: Matt Van Wagner, President, Find Me Faster (@mvanwagner)
    Q&A Moderator: Joseph Kerschbaum, Vice President of Client Services, Clix Marketing (@joekerschbaum)
    Speakers:
    Michael Behrens, SVP eMarketing, WebMetro (@MichaelBehrens)
    Benny Blum, Director, Strategy & Analytics, eSearchVision (@bennyblum)
    Ryan Hutchings, Director, Online Marketing, VacationRoost
    Matthew Mierzejewski, Vice President of PPC, RKG

    As usual, attendees tweeted their own takeaways and highlights from the panel. Here’s the best of what was said:

    @webmetro google has multiple options to map KWDS #sem #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via Mobile Web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Tip: Use longer keyword (match length) ** Adgroup + Use keyword with highest ad-rank (Quality x Bid) #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @webmetro is now showing multiple mappings how queries are being mapped to different keywords #11b
    2 hours ago via Mobile Web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Queries triggering more than one kw results in chaotic account behavior, data integrity, and accuracy of modeling & bidding #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @webmeto mapping problems occur at both campaign and ad group levels #11b
    2 hours ago via Mobile Web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    On average multi-mapping happens 10% across accounts #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Match Type length Seems to be the Most over ridden rule #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Force matching through negative keywords & choose match types carefully #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    1 query can trigger multiple keywords across adgroups & campaigns, making account control difficult! #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    #smx #11b if you have multiple ads per ad group and rotate evenly, multiple matching keywords is expected behavior
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Take back control by force matching through negative keywords #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @dan_patterson I’m digging the literal rubbing of shoulders of fellow search marketers #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    You know your business better than Google does (enough said) 🙂 #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Cross serving on a query is a frequent issue. #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Use the Google Ad Preview Tool to identify which adgroup/campaign your keywords are matched too. **it’s not always accurate though #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Solution for wrong matching: insert thousands of negatives 🙁 #11B #smx
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Have a VERY large negative keyword list to force #Google to respect your ad groups and campaigns. #SMX #11B
    2 hours ago via Tweetbot for iOS · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    #AdWords will “interpret on your behalf” to show what they believe the most relevant keyword regardless of your account structure #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    I’m appreciating the sarcasm of speaker #2 #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    It’s not a bug, it’s a feature (said Google) 🙂 #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Just because your ad is showing doesn’t mean it’s showing for what you want! -E #SMX #11B
    2 hours ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    In most cases there is weak correlation between Quality Score and Conversion Rate #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Matthew Mierzejewski from RKG. #SMX #11B bottom ads, bottom ads higher CRT, no difference in CVR. well, at least it brings more volume?
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Root of Google’s CPC decline (it’s not Mobile) it’s Brand Queries & PLA’s #SMX #11B
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    CPC 11% down, because mobile traffic has double (at lower CPC) on last qt. #SMX #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Avoid Adwords Adrank trumping your match types by granular structures with EXTENSIVE negatives #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    RKG’s says they have seen a 51% increae in Brand query clicks and an 85% decline in CPC #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Mobile: Lower engagement, less likely to convert #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Tablet: High PPV for impulse and DR / Ecom, High bounce rate for service / software #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Purchase intent and engagement varies across devices. @bennyblum #smx #11b Bid strategy should reflect this!
    2 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    I’ll be interested to hear if any Google reps respond officially to some of what was said today #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via Silver Bird · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Google rolled out new matching behavior because the system was already doing it..? Interesting thought from the scientists #smx #11B
    2 hours ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Question: Best practice. To group Broad Match keywords with Exact Match – or not? Should we isolate kw’s based on search demand? #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @rpboots I’m sure they will, but I wouldn’t expect “helpful” answers.They are all great politicians. #smx #11b
    2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Google incorrectly matches 10% of your queries due to not following their own processes #SMX #11b
    2 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Microsoft wrote a blog post about the session on its adCenter blog, including a list of tips for “taking back control”:

    • Use negative keywords
    • Force matching through negatives
    • Conducive account structure
    • Tightly themed ad groups
    • Maximize ad group match length rule
    • Easier negative implementation
    • Choose match types carefully
    • Phrase OR Broad (almost duplicate) ?
    • Broad OR Broad Match Modified ?
    • Remove duplicates/ambiguous
    • Maintain campaign budgets

    These were from Michael Behrens’ presentation. Check out their post for a more complete recap.

    Image: Aqua Teen Hunger Force (via YouTube)

  • SMX Advanced: The Periodic Table Of SEO: 2012 Edition [Live Twitter Reaction]

    SMX Advanced is officially underway in Seattle, and the first session was: The Periodic Table Of SEO: 2012 Edition. SMX’s official description for the session is as follows:

    We introduced the Periodic Table Of SEO last year at SMX Advanced. Since then, new elements have been discovered, such as a penalty for pages top-heavy with ads or boosts for being in Google+. Meanwhile, Google warns that an “over-optimization” penalty may be coming.

    Here’s the speaker list:

    Moderator: Danny Sullivan, Editor-in-Chief, Search Engine Land (@dannysullivan)
    Q&A Moderator: Jonathon Colman, Internet Marketing Manager, REI (@jcolman)
    Speakers:
    Jeff MacGurn, VP of SEO, Covario (@yerrbo)
    Mark Munroe, Senior Director, SEO, Reply (@markemunroe)
    Kristine Schachinger, Founder/Consultant, SitesWithoutWalls.com (@schachin)
    Chris Silver Smith, President, Argent Media (@si1very)

    Here’s what attendees are saying about the session on Twitter (we’ll update as the tweets pour in, so feel free to keep refreshing). It will be almost like being there:

    I have never seen Danny so dressed up! Doesn’t he know he’s in Seattle? #11A #smx
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @mattcutts is being fed grapes while sacrificing paid links backstage. If @dannysullivan says it. It must be true #smx #11a
    6 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    So much Matt Cutts humor. He is keynoting at the event this evening, by the way.

    @si1very about Ranking Factors: Quality/Trust Scores can be assessed separately from prominence #smx #11a
    4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Over 100+ factors can be assessed in quality scores (though not all will be triggered) @si1very #11A #SMX
    4 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Someone in the front row has not muted his or her very annoying computer or phone. Please mute! #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Brands rule, always have and always will #smx #11A
    5 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Privacy Policy important for trust!! #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @si1very says: the high quality sites out there have good “About Us” pages. Low quality sites don’t #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @si1very quality authorship indicators (bylines, bios, social links, etc) are also quantifiable #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    #smx #11a only about 8% of websites have a privacy policy
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @si1very speculates a low-quality writing penalty? Learn how to write well folks. And don’t buy $3 content! #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @si1very Content (and links) above the fold and page width given more importance. #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Users spend 80% of their time looking at info above the page fold. #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Good thing Google is adding its Browser Size tool to Google Analytics, where you can see what content is actually above the fold on your pages.

    SEO may be getting supplanted by User-Centered Design and Usability. We need to do what’s good for users not rankings #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Great #SEO open by @si1very, simple trust signals & the thought that user-centric design is a growing rank factor. #smx #11A
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Microformats are a factor. Users click results with snippets more. And understand what they’re clicking more – @yerrbo #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @yerrbo Talking micro formatting and rich snippets boosting CTR & rankings at #smx #11a
    4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    If you don’t use rich snippets. The online world will turn into a Ben Affleck movie with an Aerosmith ballad. @yerrbo #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Filtering Google’s search results using left nav filters instantly excludes sites that don’t have semantic markup / rich snippets #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Do-Follow, exact keyword anchor text links are seeing lowest correlation to strong rankings. High benefits to non-match #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    If Google offers a search filter and your site does NOT use rich snippet/microformats you will not be in the result #11a #smx via @yerrbo
    3 minutes ago via TweetCaster for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Even Danny’s taking the time to chime in on Twitter:

    Links are the four letter word of the SEO industry even though it has five letters @yerrbo #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Social Signals Test: G+ most, Facebook like least, twitter over time, Pinterest strong overall. @yerrbo #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Using only social signals, a new page with no other links or onsite optimization grew to position 12 quickly. @yerrbo #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Pinterest strong overall. No wonder Bing’s Duane Forrester recommends it so highly as a Penguin recovery tip.

    Testing what social signals help with Google surprise, Google+ was huge, but also Pinterest seems to build good links @yerrbo #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Great analysis of the social explosion of the anti-SOPA “Operation Blackout” by @yerrbo #smx #11a.
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Interesting – Over 10k peices of content collected from social platforms on the SOPA blackout. Less then 15% became popular. #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    68% of content that goes viral on reddit is just an image hosted on imgur #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Almost 70% of what goes viral on reddit is an image. @yerrbo #smx #11a. I’d guess 60% of that are memes!
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    I’d add that the majority of those images are hosting on Imgur (which hit 2 billion page views per month recently). Read here about how Imgur can drive big traffic to product pages (and they don’t even have iPhone and Android apps yet. They’re coming this fall.)

    for sure @yerrbo is a #reddit guy. What time does the narwhal bacon? #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Need to find this Canadian guy who is responsible for 2% of all viral content #11A #smx
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Most content consumed at work hrs. Serious in am. Humorous in pm @yerrbo study of 10k pieces of #some & #SOPA virality #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via TweetCaster for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @markmunroe 2005 SEO was fat, dumb, and happy. Not anymore 🙂 #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    #SEO 2005 buy some links build some doorway pages … not anymore Google is about relevance & trust @markmunroe #smx #11a
    47 seconds ago via TweetCaster for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Google giving answers right in the results. more knowledge graph can mean less clicks. Be fantastic to get clicked! #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    It just occurred to me to check the session’s hashtag on Google+. Not a lot happening there. Not a good sign for Google+ engagement, when the updates aren’t rolling in from an SEO conference.

    <a href=Google+ Engagement” />

    Google has thresholds for their “quality” metrics. You don’t know where you are, and you could plummet at any time. #smx #11a @markmunroe
    4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Google Analytics likely not directly used as a quality indicator @markmunroe #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Bounce rates probably aren’t factored either. Doesn’t mean they aren’t important for UX @markmunroe #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    “If your website sucks, get SUX” (Search UX) “- @markemunroe #smx #11a
    54 seconds ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Overall bounce rate may not be important. But Google sure knows when users immediately go back to Google from your site #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Apparently we are more advanced monkeys @jaredmore #smx #11A
    3 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    “Google has perfect knowledge of how your site performs in the SERPs. You have none” – @markmunroe #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    “Everything starts with a question on the SERPs” – @markmunroe #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Engagement tools help if they’re a response to the search query. Use relevant engagement tools that are specific to search queries #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    #Content can only be judged in response to a #search query. @markmunroe #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Optimize for search experience. Are users finding on your site what they are searching for in Google? Via @markmunroe #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via TweetCaster for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    optimizing for UX not Company Goals? Problem is you get to be too info based, and not sales based. Balance #SMX #11A
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    If you aren’t integrating user-testing and surveys into your strategy, you are missing out on major opportunities #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Site sucks in Google? Maybe SUX issue: bad search user experience, searchers don’t find answer bounce back to results @markmunroe #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    To Google are users’ search needs being met? If yes..good If no..check your goals @markmunroe #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via TweetCaster for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Are we really talking correlation v causation? Must we have this at every SEO conference? #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    correlation is not causation, sounds like @randfish #SMX #11A
    1 minute ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @schachin – “Correlation doesn’t equal Causation.” I feel like I’ve heard some great SEO say that before. @randfishkin #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Anyone at #11a of #smx – it’s FREEZING in here! Can we turn up the heat!
    1 minute ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @schachin – “Observer perception is often incorrect.” #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @si1very @schachin I feel like I’m back in my philosophy logic class! #11a #smx
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    SEO changes but what users want does not #SMX #11A
    2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    When Penguin hit, a lot of people were looking for Penguin-problems that were actually caused by Panda related issues @schachin #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @dannysullivan FYI this room is freeeeeeeeeezing #smx #11a
    1 minute ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @StephStMartin We’re working on turning the cold air down in this session room 🙂 #smx #11a
    2 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Trying to understand the Correlative, Causal, Causation argument in #smx #11a? Go here: http://t.co/8eAi0BAx
    4 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    “Put 10 SEOs in a room and they’ll all have a different opinion” @schachin #smx #11a
    3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    @monicawright we’re getting the same message about Pinterest in #smx #11A
    3 minutes ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Fantastic panel on new ranking factors &indicates Google is, or likely is using. Lots of stuff to implement. #smx #11a http://t.co/Wgv9ZmSH
    1 minute ago via Photos on iOS · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    People of #SMX — please help. Someone picked up my iPhone in the #11A session. I’m desperate. If you have it, pls turn it in to concierge?
    38 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    If you want more of a liveblogged account of the session, Barry Schwartz has one at Search Engine Roundtable.

  • Matt Cutts To Keynote SMX Advanced, Leaves Panda, Florida Apparel At Home

    SMX Advanced gets started on Tuesday in Seattle. In what many, I’m sure, will consider the highlight, Google’s Matt Cutts will keynote.

    Here’s what the SMX site says about it:

    Google software engineer Matt Cutts will be returning to SMX Advanced in 2012. As the head of Google’s web spam team, Matt’s been dealing with webmaster issues for Google since 2000 and is well known to many advanced search marketers from his blog and public speaking.

    Matt will participate in an always popular and engaging “You&A” format keynote, in which he’ll address questions from the SMX Advanced audience. So bring those questions, and don’t miss out on this SMX Advanced tradition!

    Just don’t expect any Panda or Florida t-shirts. Cutts tweeted:

    Almost done packing for #SMX. Leaving T-shirts with pandas or Florida on them at home for this trip. http://t.co/ASJpwdYS
    22 hours ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    He didn’t say anything about Penguin apparel. There are certainly plenty of fashionable options in the market:

    Google results - Penguin shirts

    Hopefully he’ll show up in the “Come at Me Bro” (Google’s first shopping result):

    Come at be bro Penguin shirt

    Either way, I’m sure the subject of Penguin will come up more that once at the event. Google’s Penguin update was designed to tackle webspam. That is Cutts’ department, after all.

  • New Google Panda Update Approved, On the Way

    New Google Panda Update Approved, On the Way

    Google’s Matt Cutts spoke in a Q&A session with Danny Sullivan at SMX Advanced this week, and discussed the Panda update, among other things.

    A lot of sites have been critical of Google for returning results that are scraped versions of their orignal content. Cutts is quoted as saying in a liveblog of the session, “A guy on my team [is] working on that issue. A change has been approved that should help with that issue. We’re continuing to iterate on Panda. The algorithm change originated in search quality, not the web spam team.”

    He says there’s another change coming soon, and that he still doesn’t know when Panda will be launched fully internationally (in other languages). He also says they haven’t made any manual exceptions with Panda.

    You may recall that the Mac blog Cult of Mac was hit by the original Panda update, and then after exchanging some dialogue with Google the site ended up getting some new traffic. Matt says, however, “We haven’t made any manual exceptions. Cult of Mac might have been confused because they started getting all this new traffic from blogging about it, but we haven’t made any manual exceptions.”

    Yesterday we looked at some poll results from Search Engine Roundtable that found 4% of sites were saying they had fully recovered from the Panda update. Some other sites have been finding partial recovery.

    Search Engine Roundtable Shares Panda Poll

    Image credit: Search Engine Roundtable

    On the prospect of sites having recovered from the update, Matt is quoted as saying, “The general rule is to push stuff out and then find additional signals to help differentiate on the spectrum. We haven’t done any pushes that would directly pull things back. We have recomputed data that might have impacted some sites. There’s one change that might affect sites and pull things back.”

    You may also recall Google’s list of questions that webmasters could use to assess the quality of their content. Cutts talked briefly about those questions, saying, “It could help as we recompute data.”

    He also said that what is being called “Panda 2.2” has been approved but has not yet been rolled out. “If we think you’re relatively high quality, Panda will have a smaller impact. If you’re expert enough and no one else has the good content, even if you’ve been hit by Panda that page can still rank.”

    That says a lot about original content.

  • Time to Start Placing More Emphasis on Bing SEO

    Google SEO vs Bing SEO has been a topic of discussion throughout the industry since Bing was launched. The topic got some heavy play last week at the SMX Advanced conference, and with Yahoo and Bing coming together sometime this year, online marketers are going to want to start thinking harder about incorporating Bing into their strategies if they are not already doing so.

    Do you have a strategy for Bing SEO? Yahoo? Discuss here.

    WebProNews spoke with Janet Driscoll Miller of Search Mojo out at SMX, who presented on this topic. As she notes, some businesses actually see better results from Bing than they do from Google, and when Yahoo starts using Bing for search, Bing’s share of the search market is going to grow dramatically (it also powers search in Facebook, let’s not forget).

    Janet discusses a tool Bing has in its Webmaster tools that lets you see the types of links that point into you, and lets you look at their value, so you can go after similar links.

    Bing is actually redesigning its Webmaster Tools, however. WebProNews also spoke with Bing’s Eric Gilmore about this.

    The point is, Google’s Webmaster Tools have been very helpful for site-owners over the years in their conquest for better rankings. Now that Bing is growing in significance, its tools are going to be helpful as well.

    Have you used Bing’s webmaster tools? Did they help your rankings? Comment here.

  • Why Recent Google Algorithm Update is Costing Some Sites

    Google’s recent algorithm update, nicknamed "Mayday" by webmasters got a lot of people riled up, as many claimed it seriously affected their rankings, and potentially their revenues.

    Do you think the update has affected your revenue? Comment here.

    WebProNews spoke with Google’s Matt Cutts at SMX Advanced, and he talked a little bit about Mayday, saying that it was designed to try and spot signals of quality on pages and sites that would be good for users.

    He noted that the update was not part of his Webspam team’s efforts, but was part of general search quality, and that human intervention is not involved. It’s strictly algorithmic.

    Note: Mayday is not the only thing Cutts talks about in the interview above. He also talks Caffeine and video sitemaps. If you have a response to any of this stuff, please feel free to chime in, in the comments.

    Cutts says auto-generated pages and content farms tend to get hit the most by Mayday. His advice to webmasters affected by it, is basically to improve quality. He says to make sure you’re returning the highest quality content for users. Stuff that’s not available anywhere else can be helpful – stuff that’s not duplicate or scraped or lower quality.

    Based on the reactions we’ve seen from disgruntled webmasters, I’m guessing that advice isn’t going to satisfy everyone. Here are a few samples of reader comments from our previous coverage of the update:

    "In conjunction with the drop in Google traffic, I have seen a matching drop in clicks out from my site to other sites. So it’s real, and it’s not been rosy to deal with."

    "Every time they make an improvement something else goes wrong."

    "Yes I have worked hard trying to rank and it keeps changing. Decided to go to other mehtods and forget about Google and their ranking."

    Even Cutts says you shouldn’t just focus on search engines.

    Bruce Clay, who runs a highly regarded marketing firm had some interesting things to say about the update (about 12 minutes into the video):

    Gerben commenting on the interview at our video blog says, "Well, having a portal completely based on User Generated Content is affected by #mayday also, don’t think the explanation is completely correct."

    One reader offered some sound advice: "Never forget the first rules in SEO: It changes all the time. So, Google has made a change, which is not the first one. Do the basics right and you will have a sound long-term strategy."

    I don’t imagine taking Cutts’ advice about improving quality can hurt either way. The worst thing that happens is that the user benefits from better content.

    More on Mayday (including comments from affected webmasters) here

    Do you think your rankings have been affected by the "Mayday" update?
     Let us know.

  • Bing Talks New Webmaster Tools

    Bing Talks New Webmaster Tools

    Microsoft made some significant announcements related to Bing at SMX Advanced in Seattle. Later this summer, Bing will offer a redesigned version of Bing Webmaster Tools based on feedback from webmasters. The tools will provide webmasters with a simplified, more intuitive experience that delivers a comprehensive view of how Bing indexes their sites, a representative for Bing tells WebProNews.

     Highlights include:

    – The Bing Webmaster Tools have been re-engineered from the ground up to offer more data, including enhanced charting functionality, through a modern, improved user interface. The new tools remain web-based, and basic functionality will be available through most web browsers.

    – The tools assess performance in several key areas, including crawl, index and traffic. Each area will offer granular data going back as far as six months with enhanced, on-the-fly adjustable charting, enabling webmasters to focus on the timeline trends that are most meaningful to them.

    – The update also includes a new experience built with Silverlight, featuring rich visual charts to help webmasters quickly analyze several months of data to identify trends and drive insights.

    Update: Bing’s Eric Gilmore tells us about the new Bing Webmaster Tools in the following interview:

     More here.

    Bing also announced social search, which uses public updates from Fan Pages and aggregated data from public updates to deliver real-time results. Doug Caverly talks more about this here.

  • Caffeine Transforms Google From Bus to Limo

    WebProNews spoke with Google’s Matt Cutts out at SMX Advanced today. He talked a little about Caffeine, which Google just announced is complete, nearly a year after its initial announcement at SES, when Matt also spoke with us about it.

    Caffeine, it should be noted, does not change how Google ranks content. It’s all about the speed at which Google can index content. Cutts says you’ll start seeing fresher results. This is separate from Google’s real-time results. You’ll see fresher results outside of that box as well.

    He compared it to having a limo waiting for you to take you where you want to go when you arrive at an airport, as opposed to standing around waiting for a bus to pick you up (the bus would be Google’s old system in this analogy).

    Caffeine allows Google to do a larger amount of indexing, with the capacity to scale it up much more. It helps in letting Google add richer data to go along with other data, meaning not just links and anchor text, but any info Google deems useful.

    Cutts also discusses the recent "Mayday" update, video sitemaps, and more.

    You can read more about Caffeine here.