WebProNews

Tag: SEO

  • Study: 45% of Businesses Saw Ranking Changes From Mobile-Friendly Update

    Study: 45% of Businesses Saw Ranking Changes From Mobile-Friendly Update

    So was Google’s mobile-friendly algorithm update (“Mobilegeddon”) overhyped or not? Well, perhaps yes and no. While the initial consensus after the update’s launch was that changes in search rankings were minimal, a recent study indicates that small-to-medium sized enterprises did see some significant changes – just not complete ranking obliteration as the “Mobilegeddon” name suggested.

    Did your site see any rankings shift whatsoever after the mobile-friendly update? Positive or negative? Was your site optimized for mobile? Let us know in the comments.

    Google released an algorithm update on April 21 that began taking the mobile-friendliness of a site into account when ranking that site in search results. It’s still just one of many signals Google uses, and it’s not as significant as relevance or quality, but it is clearly a factor Google is taking very seriously as more searches are performed from mobile devices than on desktop now.

    Ahead of the update there was borderline mass hysteria as reports would have had you believe sites that weren’t optimized for mobile faced the possibility of disappearing from the search results. That didn’t exactly happen. Not only was the weight of this signal over-implied, but many sites rushed to comply with Google’s mobile-friendly guidelines leading up to that date, and ultimately the rankings just didn’t change all that much based on early reports.

    Google’s John Mueller recently had this to say about the update:

    I think one of the difficulties here is that it is a very broad change. So while it’s had a fairly big impact across all the search results, it doesn’t mean that in every search result you will see very big changes. So that is something that affects a lot of different sites, a lot of different queries, but it is not such that the sites disappear from the search results completely if they are not mobile friendly.

    On the one hand, that makes a lot of sense for the sites that aren’t able to go mobile friendly yet, maybe like small businesses who don’t have the time or the money to set their sites for that. These are results that are still fairly relevant in the search results, so we need to keep them in there some how.

    The other aspect that we noticed is that a lot of sites really moved forward on going mobile. So where we expected essentially a little bit of a bigger change, because of maybe bigger sites that weren’t mobile friendly, did take the time to go mobile friendly and with that, they didn’t see that much of a change.

    Since then, digital marketing agency Koozai has released results from a study of 2000 SMEs across the US, finding that businesses experienced a drop in organic rankings and traffic even though they had optimized their sites for mobile, and that many have been left confused by the results.

    The study also suggests that many businesses did indeed see ranking changes, it just wasn’t to the point of “mobile gedddon”. It was more like their sites dropped down a few spots. So, pretty much like Mueller was saying. Still, even these milder drops have led to significant traffic decreases in some cases.

    The study found that 69% of businesses said the suggestion that the update would cause “mobilegeddon” was overhyped, incorrect, and unhelpful. Frankly I’m surprised that number wasn’t higher.

    45% of businesses claimed they had experienced changes to their rankings or traffic as a result of the update, and 41% of those were concerned that they had seen a drop in rankings by at least three places and had noticed a drop in traffic as a result. Some of these saw as much as a 50% decline. 27% said they had seen a drop in rankings even though they had optimized for mobile. 37% were said to be concerned that the update might have an impact on sales, while 44% were not worried as they said most of their sales came from desktops.

    12% were apparently completely oblivious to Google’s mobile-friendly test tool as they said they didn’t even know whether their websites were optimized for mobile or not.

    49% said they didn’t know if sales on their desktops sites had initially come from visitors viewing their products or services on mobile.

    “The hype that the Google mobile update would cause carnage in the search engine rankings missed the larger picture. Exaggerating the impact meant that businesses didn’t anticipate that even small changes in their ranking can have an big impact on their organic mobile search results,” said Ben Norman, CEO of Koozai. “The survey reveals inconsistent effects are being felt by businesses that has resulted in confusion and concern. When a business has optimized for mobile then drops three places, it is understandable that they feel angry that they have acted on Google’s warnings and yet have still experienced a negative impact.”

    “With more than 200 Google ranking factors, many businesses may have dropped in the organic search results when a competitor optimized for mobile because they were better optimized for some of these other ranking factors,” he added. “The survey also uncovered a worrying lack of understanding in the SME community of ecommerce analytics. Many consumers today will research on mobile than go onto purchase on desktop. Many SMEs are missing out on these lead creation opportunities if they don’t know if their ecommerce sites aren’t giving their potential customers a good experience on mobile.”

    A lot of the news out of Google this week has been related to another mobile ranking signal the company announced at the same time it announced the mobile-friendly update. That’s app indexing. While it was initially just for Android, Google announced that it will begin indexing content in iOS apps.

    At its Google I/O developer conference, it also announced “Now on Tap,” which will be built into the next version of Android, and will enable users to get contextually relevant information from Google Now sources. App indexing reportedly figures into this as well, and can give you more opportunities to get your app content in front of users.

    Did you see any effects from the mobile-friendly update? Tell us about them.

  • Mobile Apps Mean More For Search Visibility

    Mobile Apps Mean More For Search Visibility

    If your business doesn’t have a mobile app yet, it might be time to change that…for SEO purposes. Now it’s an even better idea to have an app available for both Android and iOS users. Google is indexing app content across both platforms, and it’s using the implementation of app indexing as a ranking signal for search results.

    Do mobile apps make sense for your business? Do you already have them? Planning to have them developed? Discuss.

    First off, you should know that more Google searches are now taking place on mobile devices than on computers in ten countries. That includes the U.S. and Japan. That means on smartphones specifically. When Google announced this news, it shared a report about search ads getting better for app discovery, so that’s another thing to consider. One in four app users discovers an app through search, according to the report. And Google’s really only just getting started with this whole app indexing thing.

    Google first began testing app indexing in the fall of 2013. Googlebot began indexing content in Android apps, and gave webmasters the ability to let Google know which app they’d like Google to index through their existing sitemaps file and through Webmaster Tools. Over time, they expanded the testing, and at Google I/O last year, they opened up app indexing to all Android developers. Here’s a session from the event, which you might want to take a look at if this is all still new to you.

    Here’s a much shorter overview on getting your Android app in the Google index:

    For more on getting your Android app set up, read this.

    In December, Google said clicks on app deep links jumped by 10x the prior quarter, with 15% of signed-in Google searches on Android now returning deep links. These numbers have likely only increased since then.

    As you probably know, Google announced two new mobile ranking signals in February. One was the famous mobile-friendly update, which looks at the mobile-friendliness of your mobile website. You probably heard it referred to as “mobilegeddon,” though ultimately, it so far hasn’t had a very big impact on rankings in general.

    The other signal Google announced, which it said it had already implemented, was app indexing. That was only for signed in Google users who had the app installed on their Android devices at first, but last month, Google expanded the signal so that users no longer had to have the apps installed. That’s huge.

    “You’ve invested time and effort into making your app an awesome experience, and we want to help people find the great content you’ve created,” said product manager Lawrence Chang in a blog post. “App Indexing has already been helping people engage with your Android app after they’ve installed it — we now have 30 billion links within apps indexed…people searching on Google can also discover your app if they haven’t installed it yet. If you’ve implemented App Indexing, when indexed content from your app is relevant to a search done on Google on Android devices, people may start to see app install buttons for your app in search results. Tapping these buttons will take them to the Google Play store where they can install your app, then continue straight on to the right content within it.”

    “With the addition of these install links, we are starting to use App Indexing as a ranking signal for all users on Android, regardless of whether they have your app installed or not,” he added. “We hope that Search will now help you acquire new users, as well as re-engage your existing ones.”

    This week, Google announced the expansion of app indexing to iOS apps, and there’s no reason to think that the ranking signal won’t apply there as well.

    This isn’t available to all iOS developers just yet, but Google says indexed links from an initial group of apps it’s ben working with will begin appearing on iOS in search results both in the Google App and Chrome for signed-in users globally in the coming weeks.

    Google says it wants to make the technology available to more app developers ASAP, so if you want to get a head start on that, you should add deep linking support to your iOS app, make sure it’s possible to return to search results with one click, provide deep link annotations on your site, and let Google know you’re interested.

    In a separate announcement, Google also revealed that goo.gl short links will now function as a single link for you to use to all your content, whether it’s in your Android app, iOS app, or website.

    “Once you’ve taken the necessary steps to set up App Indexing for Android and iOS, goo.gl URLs will send users straight to the right page in your app if they have it installed, and everyone else to your website. This will provide additional opportunities for your app users to re-engage with your app,” explained Google software engineer Fabian Schlup. “This feature works for both new short URLs and retroactively, so any existing goo.gl short links to your content will now also direct users to your app.”

    You can integrate the URL shortener API into your app’s share flow to take advantage of the feature a well. This way, users will be able to share links that automatically redirect accordingly. Others will be able to embed links in their sites and apps which deep link directly to your app.

    “Take Google Maps as an example,” said Schlup. “With the new cross-platform goo.gl links, the Maps share button generates one link that provides the best possible sharing experience for everyone. When opened, the link auto-detects the user’s platform and if they have Maps installed. If the user has the app installed, the short link opens the content directly in the Android or iOS Maps app. If the user doesn’t have the app installed or is on desktop, the short link opens the page on the Maps website.”

    You can set up app deep linking on goo.gl by participating in app indexing for Android and iOS and using the API with your app’s share flow, email campaigns, etc. That part is optional.

    Last week, Google Search Console (formerly Webmaster Tools) added new reports to show how Google understands and treats app content in search results. This should come in quite handy if you go down the app indexing path.

    Google I/O is just getting underway, so keep an eye out for plenty of content from there that will help you optimize your mobile apps and get more out of app indexing. Here’s the Google Developers YouTube channel, which will likely see uploads of related sessions from the conference eventually.

    Are Google’s app indexing efforts enough to make you get your own mobile apps out there? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via Google

  • Google Starts Indexing iOS App Content

    Google Starts Indexing iOS App Content

    Google just took its App Indexing initiative to the next level with the announcement that it is bringing app indexing to iOS apps.

    This is huge news considering that many app developers build for iOS before Android if they even bother to build for Android at all. Google recently named app indexing as a ranking signal in mobile search results as well.

    Product manager Eli Wald says in a blog post:

    We’ve been helping users discover relevant content from Android apps in Google search results for a while now. Starting today, we’re bringing App Indexing to iOS apps as well. This means users on both Android and iOS will be able to open mobile app content straight from Google Search.

    Indexed links from an initial group of apps we’ve been working with will begin appearing on iOS in search results both in the Google App and Chrome for signed-in users globally in the coming weeks.

    Google says it wants to make the technology available to more app developers ASAP, so if you want to get a head start, you should add deep linking support to your iOS app, make sure it’s possible to return to search results with one click, provide deep link annotations on your site, and let Google know you’re interested.

    For Android, read: How To Set Up App Indexing For Ranking In Google

    Google I/O is about to begin this week, and you can count on there being plenty of content related to this coming from there.

    Last week, Google Search Console (formerly Webmaster Tools) added new reports to show how Google understands and treats app content in search results.

    Image via Google

  • Google Has Replaced Matt Cutts

    Google Has Replaced Matt Cutts

    It looks like Matt Cutts has been officially replaced as the head of web spam at Google. We don’t know who his replacement is, and we might not anytime soon, but the company has confirmed his replacement nevertheless.

    In July, it will be the one-year anniversary of when Cutts announced he was taking leave from Google. It was originally supposed to last at least through the following October. At the time, he wrote on his personal blog:

    I wanted to let folks know that I’m about to take a few months of leave. When I joined Google, my wife and I agreed that I would work for 4-5 years, and then she’d get to see more of me. I talked about this as recently as last month and as early as 2006. And now, almost fifteen years later I’d like to be there for my wife more. I know she’d like me to be around more too, and not just physically present while my mind is still on work.

    So we’re going to take some time off for a few months. My leave starts next week. Currently I’m scheduled to be gone through October. Thanks to a deep bench of smart engineers and spam fighters, the webspam team is in more-than-capable hands. Seriously, they’re much better at spam fighting than I am, so don’t worry on that score.

    At the end of October, Cutts revealed in a tweet that he was extending his leave into 2015:

    In November, Cutts made some comments on a web chat show indicating that he might be interested in doing different work at Google when he decides to go back to work.

    Search Engine Land is now reporting that Google has someone new in the Matt Cutts position of head of web spam, but that this person won’t be “the all-around spokesperson” that Cutts was, so they’re not naming who it is. Danny Sullivan writes:

    Going forward, Google says to continue to expect what’s already been happening while Cutts has been away. Various individual Googlers will keep splitting the role of providing advice and answers to SEOs and publishers in online forums, conferences and other places.

    So far, webmaster trends analyst John Mueller has been the most publicly visible voice of webmaster issues for Google on the internet, regularly hosting lengthy webmaster hangouts and talking about various Google updates and whatnot.

    Matt’s Twitter bio still says, “I’m the head of the webspam team at Google. (Currently on leave).”

    Image via YouTube

  • What Does Google’s New Tweet Section Mean For You?

    What Does Google’s New Tweet Section Mean For You?

    Google and Twitter have been teasing us with a new integration of tweets into Google search results for months, but this week they finally made the official announcement. Real-time tweets are now showing in Google search results on mobile devices with desktop integration to come soon.

    What do you think of the new feature? Do you see any opportunities to help your site or online presence? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    The integration takes the form of a carousel that appears in search results, which lets you swipe sideways to see various tweets. It only appears on some searches, and it’s unclear how and when exactly Google decides to show them. The examples we’ve seen have been for Twitter profile searches, celebrity searches, and newsy/trendy topic searches.

    The placement of the tweets in search results varies. I assume it’s based on now relevant Google feels those tweets are to a particular search. If the search is related to an event, perhaps Google will be more likely to show them toward the top while it’s actually happening. I’m only speculating.

    Google isn’t saying much of anything about how it determines what tweets to show or how it shows them. It’s refusing to answer questions about this, and the blog posts from both Twitter and Google on the integration are pretty short and vague. It’s easy to understand why this would be the case. They don’t want people to game the system and abuse the feature.

    It’s entirely possible that we’re only seeing the very beginning of what Google will ultimately do with its newfound tweet access. We spoke with Stone Temple Consulting’s Eric Enge about the new integration, and he believes Google will be doing a lot of experimenting and potentially evolving its use of the tweets.

    Earlier this year, after Google’s deal with Twitter was announced, we had a conversation with Enge about some studies his company had conducted, including one that analyzed Google’s use of tweets at the time. There were a lot of interesting findings in those, which you can learn more about here. Now that the new integration is live, we wanted to see what Enge thought about it, and if he can see any validations or contradictions to what the study found. Here’s what he told us:

    Right now the integration between Google and Twitter is quite light. Currently, it’s only visible from Smartphone devices. In addition, it’s clear that they are experimenting. For example, when you search on a name, such as “Taylor Swift”, you see tweets that she has put out there. Yet, the initial release showed tweets that mentioned her. This is typical of Google, where they experiment with different implementations to see what works best, before settling on one for the longer term. I expect this experimentation to continue.

    What this means for visibility in the short term is not much at all. This process is in the very early stages. Think of this as Google proving that they can access, process, and leverage the data from the Twitter firehose. I’d expect more substantial integration sometime soon. The whole process may take months to play out.

    What I’d love to see is Google do something involving personalization related to Twitter. I.e., if you share a link in a tweet, and then later search on a related topic, that particular article might rank higher in the search results. I have no way to know if they are getting enough info to implement something like this, but it would be a very cool feature for them to be able to add.

    As you know, our two most well-known studies on Twitter evaluated how Google Indexes tweets, and how to maximize Twitter engagement. The current integration tests between Google and Twitter don’t really feature anything that would dramatically change the conclusions of either of those studies. I think the real story is yet to come.

    Frankly, I expect both studies to change. Twitter indexing could well skyrocket, as our indexing study showed indexation rates for Tweets of just over 7%. Imagine if this jumps to 50% or more. This could be a huge deal!

    In addition, the simple act of rendering tweets in search results will not create a new source of engagement, which is whether or not you are able to get displayed. In particular, how timely are you with Tweeting our news. If you are fast with this, your tweet will get far more attention than ever before.

    Overall, I think this initial integration is big news because it’s the start of a process. I can’t wait to see how the rest of the story unfolds!

    It does seem like Google may use hashtag searches as an indication of when users might want to see tweets. While not all hashtag searches yield twitter results, others mainly related to things that are being talked about a lot at the time do.

    Under Google’s previous Twitter deal, it had a realtime search feature, which included tweets in addition to content from other services. It would be cool if they could bring content from other sources like Instagram, Facebook, etc. into the carousel, at least for hashtag searches as hashtags extend well beyond the Twittervese these days. Either way, Google’s approach seems like all the more reason to include hashtags in tweets for visibility purposes. It is unclear how often people are actually searching Google for hashtags however.

    As you can see in the screenshots, the tweet section displays media (images/gifs/videos) from tweets. This seems like a greater incentive to include media in tweets, as they are more eye catching on the Google results page.

    In terms of which tweets Google chooses to show, it could be taking any variety of factors into account. It does say “Popular on Twitter,” on some carousel results, but it sometimes shows tweets that are only seconds old and haven’t had much time to become too popular, so it’s likely taking other popularity signals into account. Possibly follower count or popularity of shared links, for example.

    In its initial blog post, Google showed an example of a search for Malcolm X, and included a tweet from Stacy Parker LeMelle, who has 10.5K followers. The tweet was just 12 seconds old. Google is likely using the popularity of the actual link being shared as a signal as well. That same tweet included a link from the New York Times, which was no doubt shared plenty of times.

    Ahead of the actual integration launched, we also talked with Conversocial CEO Joshua March about how it might impact the reputations of Twitter users and businesses. It may be early in Google’s integration, but as it stands now, it does make the tweets quite prominent, particularly when they appear at the top of the page. The lessons from that discussion pretty much still apply to what Google has already rolled out.

    “Tweets from customers about issues or bad service experiences could be on the front page,” said March. “If businesses have a social first approach to customer service then they can tackle these quickly and head on, creating positive engagements that will show up instead. This deal has the potential to accelerate the kind of service-related Twitter crises many brands have already experienced.”

    If nothing else, the feature could net some who show up in search results some new Twitter followers.

    What are your initial impressions of the rollout? Do you like Google’s approach? How would you like to see them change it? Share your thoughts in the comments.

  • Google Search Console Gets App Indexing-Friendly

    Google Search Console Gets App Indexing-Friendly

    Earlier this week, Google announced that it has rebranded Google Webmaster Tools as Google Search Console. The company did not announce any new features to accompany the name change, but it didn’t take them long to unveil the first updates to the product under the new brand.

    On Friday, Google announced the addition of new reports to show how Google understands and treats app content in search results. If you have an Android app, you can open Search Console, and enter your app name. You’ll have to use your Google Play account to let it know you have access to the app. If you don’t, you’ll need to ask the owner to verify it and add you. You’ll also have to associate your site with your app, which is required for App Indexing to work. Google notes that it also helps with understanding and ranking app content better.

    There’s a new Search Analytics report, which shows detailed info on top queries, app pages, and traffic by country. It includes a “comprehensive” set of filters so you can narrow down to a specific query type or region, or sort by clicks, impressions, CTR, and positions.

    “Use the Search Analytics report to compare which app content you consider most important with the content that actually shows up in search and gets the most clicks,” Google writes in a blog post. “If they match, you’re on the right track! Your users are finding and liking what you want them to see. If there’s little overlap, you may need to restructure your navigation, or make the most important content easier to find. Also worth checking in this case: have you provided deep links to all the app content you want your users to find?”

    The Crawl Errors report will show the type and number of errors it detects with your app content. There’s also a new alpha version of the Fetch as Google tool for apps to let you see if an app URI works and how Google renders it.

    “It can also be useful for comparing the app content with the webpage content to debug errors such as content mismatch,” says Google. “In many cases, the mismatch errors are caused by blocked resources within the app or by pop-ups asking users to sign in or register. Now you can see and resolve these issues.”

    Google announced app indexing as a ranking signal earlier this year at the same time it announced its mobile-friendly update. It just went into effect earlier. At first it was only for signed in mobile users who had the apps installed on their devices. Google has since expanded the signal to include all Android users. It said in April it had indexed 30 billion links within apps.

    READ: How To Set Up App Indexing For Ranking In Google

    Images via Google

  • Bing Wants To Better Surface Mobile Apps

    Bing Wants To Better Surface Mobile Apps

    Bing is trying to make it easier for mobile application developers to get their apps found in search results. It’s expanding its “Actions Intelligence” to Bing and other Bing-powered search products, such as Cortana, and creating a “massive” index of apps and app actions.

    To make it easier for developers to participate, it’s utilizing standardized markup, which developers can use on their websites to establish the link between content and apps and between content entities and the actions that apps perform on them. Bing is utilizing App Links, which Facebook launched last year as an open source project, and Schema.org.

    They have an new tool in the Bing Webmaster Tools pubic tools area. It’s called the Applinks Markup tester, and shows you how Bing extracts the App Links data from your page and performs a validation process.

    “Establishing a link between apps and your content is not where it stops,” says Vincent Wehren, Product Lead Webmaster and Publisher Experiences at Bing. “More likely than not, searchers are trying to perform an action, complete a task using your app. So how can we establish the relationship between the content (entity), the task (action), and the provider (app) that can complete the task? The Bing intelligence platform is already pretty good at inferring some of this information based on its understanding of your site, but as always, being explicit about these things from the publisher side gives you an edge. Your tool of choice in this case: schema.org.”

    “Expressing the relationship between entity, action, and your app using schema.org is a bit more involved than App Links markup, but it is extremely powerful in that it allows your web page as well as app to rank a whole new range of entity action-oriented queries,” he says. “Naturally, your app developer needs to do also do some work to open the app with in the right location, and this work is usually specific to the platform or device. I dedicated a section of my App Discovery talk at Build 2015 to this very topic. The talk was geared towards enabling app deep linking and app actions on Windows 10 and Cortana. However, the applinks.org website has detailed instructions on the navigation protocol on iOS and Androidas well and Bing is creating an app index that covers all of these platforms.”

    Read this blog post for much more on implementing all of this.

    Bing has already started analyzing the web for App Links and actions markup, and is telling people to get started right away. It’s also readying mobile-friendliness as a ranking signal, not unlike Google, which recently announced app indexing as a ranking signal on Android devices.

    Image via Bing

  • Google Webmaster Tools Changed To Google Search Console

    Google Webmaster Tools Changed To Google Search Console

    Recognizing that a lot of different types of people use Webmaster Tools beyond just traditional webmasters, Google has decided to rebrand its popular product to reflect that. From now on, Google Webmaster Tools will be known as Google Search Console. Here’s the logo:

    “For nearly ten years, Google Webmaster Tools has provided users with constantly evolving tools and metrics to help make fantastic websites that our systems love showing in Google Search,” wrote product manager Michael Fink in a blog post. “In the past year, we sought to learn more about you, the loyal users of Google Webmaster Tools: we wanted to understand your role and goals in order to make our product more useful to you.”

    “It turns out that the traditional idea of the ‘webmaster’ reflects only some of you,” he added. “We have all kinds of Webmaster Tools fans: hobbyists, small business owners, SEO experts, marketers, programmers, designers, app developers, and, of course, webmasters as well. What you all share is a desire to make your work available online, and to make it findable through Google Search. So, to make sure that our product includes everyone who cares about Search, we’ve decided to rebrand Google Webmaster Tools as Google Search Console.”

    Google did not announce any new features beyond the rebranding.

    Google webmaster trends analyst John Muller had this to say on Google+:

    I remember … back when Google Webmaster Tools first launched as a way of submitting sitemap files. It’s had an awesome run, the teams have brought it a long way over the years. It turns out that the traditional idea of the “webmaster” reflects only some of you. We have all kinds of Webmaster Tools fans: hobbyists, small business owners, SEO experts, marketers, programmers, designers, app developers, and, of course, webmasters as well. So, to make sure that our product includes everyone who cares about Search, we’ve decided to rebrand Google Webmaster Tools as Google Search Console .

    The rebranding does seem much more user-friendly than the term Webmaster Tools, which some with limited web experience may have found a little intimidating. In an era where businesses must have and maintain a web presence, the offering is more important than ever, and the rebranding could just lead to more businesses utilizing the Webmaster Tools features.

    Image via Google

  • Mobile-Friendly Update Bing Announced In November Still Hasn’t Rolled Out

    Mobile-Friendly Update Bing Announced In November Still Hasn’t Rolled Out

    In November, Bing principal program manager Mir Rosenberg wrote in a blog post, “We started probing web pages for ‘mobile friendliness’ and ranking web pages accordingly on our users’ mobile phones.”

    Bing had begun using mobile friendliness as a ranking signal for a “small but steadily growing percentage” of mobile queries. Apparently that growth was pretty slow, as a full roll-out is still only on the horizon.

    In a new blog post, Bing’s Shyam Jayasankar announced that Bing “will be rolling out mobile friendliness as a signal in ranking.” Apparently the older announcement was just about future plans, thought it didn’t make it sound that way. Either way, like Google, Bing also cares if your site is mobile-friendly.

    Last month, Bing began labeling results as “mobile-friendly” just like Google started doing last year as it prepared to get sites ready for the algorithmic adjustment.

    Here’s an example of how results might change as a result of the mobile-friendly signal:

    Bing isn’t saying exactly when the update will fully roll out, but you probably won’t need to worry about it too much if you’ve already made your site mobile-friendly for Google users or are in the process of doing so.

    As an added bonus, Bing is working on a tool to help webmasters analyze webpages using its mobile-friendliness classifier. This will become available in a few week. Or you could probably just use Google’s.

    More about Bing’s mobile-friendly efforts here and here.

    Google’s mobile-friendly update didn’t have quite the major impact on search results that many expected. Will Bing’s?

  • Google Says To Reach YouTube Users On How-To Searches

    Google Says To Reach YouTube Users On How-To Searches

    Google is giving marketers some best practices for capitalizing on major growth in how-to searches on YouTube. Believe it or not, these types of searches have seen 70% growth year-over-year. A whopping one hundred million hours of such content has already been watched in North America in 2015, it says.

    In other words, this is an opportunity for businesses who can provide high quality how-to content to attract some eyeballs.

    This information comes from a Think with Google article by David Mogensen, Head of B2B Product Marketing for YouTube and Google Display (via Marketing Land). According to him, people look for how-to videos increasingly on mobile with 91% of smartphone users turning to their devices for ideas while completing a task.

    These searches are on the rise across all age groups, but millennials are especially likely to search YouTube for how-to videos. According to Google, 67% of them agree that they can find a YouTube video on anything they want to learn.

    I guess that’s why Google Helpouts didn’t take off.

    “Being there in these moments may be the single most important thing a marketer can do, but many aren’t,” writes Mogensen. “Marketing is still largely planned against brand moments and milestones, and it is anchored to campaign flights and product launches—not personal moments like these. The reason for this is simple. Most marketing plans are grounded in traditional one-way media: Broadcast from brands to large audiences.” Without signals of intent, traditional media makes it impossible to know whether someone actually needs or wants your product.

    “But when people ask how to do something, that’s a need,” he continues. “That’s someone asking, ‘can you help me out?’ Digital media let brands respond to those questions and be there at the very moment someone needs them most. Brands that successfully do this can win loyalty and drive sales to boot. In fact, nearly one in three millennials say they’ve purchased a product as a result of watching a how-to video.”

    He talks about how Home Depot has a bunch of how tos for home improvement and how Valspar has content about various paint-related subjects.

    Home improvement, beauty, and cooking are among the most popular categories for how-to searches.

    As far as best practices, Google says to identify the “I-wan-to-do moments” in which people have a need that your brand can help with. It says to find these moments across the whole consumer journey and put them at the center of your strategy. You should also figure out what questions and concerns people have related to the types of projects you sell or the projects they’re used for, and then create the content to serve as resources for those, it says.

    Google also suggests looking at when how-to searches occur, and making your videos easier to find by adding descriptive titles, details, and relevant tags to each video. Promoting the videos is another option.

    One thing that Mogensen didn’t really get into that is certainly worth considering is how frequently videos appear in Google search results. You have to imagine that there are plenty of these how-to searches happening right on Google.

    We recently looked at a study on Google Universal Search trends, and video is the most frequent type of universal result Google shows. They appeared in 55% of search results pages analyzed. While the percentage of search results pages showing video results actually fell over the course of 2014, videos appear more often than anything else by far. 80% of videos displayed in Universal Search results came from YouTube.

    Image via Google

  • Is Google’s Panda Not Doing Its Job Well Enough?

    Is Google’s Panda Not Doing Its Job Well Enough?

    Google has been advising webmasters against publishing thin content for years. In fact, the famous/infamous Panda update was designed to weed thin content out of the high rankings of Google’s search results. Obviously that hasn’t completely deterred websites from producing it.

    Do you think the Panda update has done its job well? Let us know what you think in the comments.

    Some webmasters who have been affected by the update are still waiting on Google to launch a Panda refresh. There hasn’t been one that we know of for something like seven months, which is highly unusual for Panda historically. Last week there was some talk that one may have launched, but Google denied this.

    Depending on who you ask, the effectiveness of Panda has always been questionable, which is somewhat disturbing considering it has the power to kill businesses and jobs (not that this is exclusive to Panda). In recent months, the update has really come into question, considering that it apparently had a negative impact on one of the most authoritative blogs in the SEO industry.

    Perhaps it’s taking so long for Google to push out a new Panda update because it knows it has some serious flaws. I’m only speculating.

    The company reportedly just blasted out “mass manual actions,” sending webmasters warnings about thin content. Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable reports:

    it seems like over the weekend, Google has issued mass manual actions over “Thin content with little or no added value.”

    It seems Google went after a content network and located many of the sites participating in this network and then slapping them with thin content manual actions. I do not have confirmation from Google but I received a couple notes about it over the weekend from anonymous sources and there are many threads in the various forums with people complaining about these thin content actions.

    Again, such penalties are nothing new, but that doesn’t mean everybody getting one understands exactly what Google means by “thin content with little or no added value”.

    Google says if you get such a message, it means the search engine has detected “low-quality pages or shallow pages” on your site. This may include auto-generated content, doorway pages, content from other sources (scraped or low-quality guest blog post), or thin affiliate sites.

    This is in addition to the a recent algorithm update that went after doorway pages.

    “These techniques don’t provide users with substantially unique or valuable content, and are in violation of our Webmaster Guidelines,” Google says in a Webmaster help document. “As a result, Google has applied a manual spam action to the affected portions of your site. Actions that affect your whole site are listed under Site-wide matches. Actions that affect only part of your site and/or some incoming links to your site are listed under Partial matches.”

    Here’s a video of Google’s Matt Cutts talking about thin content with little or no added value.

    Google’s recommended actions for resolving your issues include reviewing the auto-generated content, affiliate program, scraped content, and doorway page guideline documentation. Then, check for content on your site that duplicates content from other sites, as well as for thin content pages with affiliate links and doorway pages/auto-generated content. Basically you’ll want to get rid of any of that.

    Google also points to its classic post-Panda launch blog post, which gives you a list of 23 questions to ask yourself about your site and content. These include:

    1. Would you trust the information presented in this article?

    2. Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?

    3. Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?

    4. Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?

    5. Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?

    6. Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?

    7. Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?

    8. Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?

    9. How much quality control is done on content?

    10. Does the article describe both sides of a story?

    11. Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?

    12. Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?

    13. Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?

    14. For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?

    15. Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?

    16. Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?

    17. Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?

    18. Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?

    19. Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?

    20. Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?

    21. Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?

    22. Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?

    23. Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

    It is interesting that Google has to dish out manual penalties for this stuff all this time after the Panda update launched. That combined with the fact that Panda has been MIA for so long really makes you wonder just how effective it really was.

    Anyhow, if you got a manual penalty and get your site to meet these guidelines, you can submit a reconsideration request and wait for a message in Webmaster Tools, which will let you know when Google has reviewed your site. The penalty will be lifted if Google determines that you’ve fixed the issues adequately.

    Have Google’s search results reflected a successful Panda algorithm in your opinion? Share your thoughts.

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Was Google’s Update Really Mobilegeddon?

    Was Google’s Update Really Mobilegeddon?

    It turns out Google’s mobile-friendly update didn’t quite have the doomsday impact that some thought it might. I can’t say I’m shocked. While it’s clearly a significant update, these cries of “mobilegeddon” always felt a little sensational to me. While the importance of having a mobile-friendly site can’t be overstated, the fact is that many sites were already mobile-friendly, and it’s still just one of many signals Google uses in its algorithm.

    Did you notice any significant impact from the update? Let us know in the comments.

    The roll-out of the update completed about a week ago. At the time, Google’s Gary Illyes implied that the amount of sites impacted was relatively low.

    This came with the caveat that while the update had completed its roll-out, Google still hadn’t indexed everything yet.

    This week, 3Q Digital put out a report looking at the effects of the update using the Searchmetrics Mobile SEO Visibility Metric and comparing it with Sessions recorded in Google Analytics. These were the main takeaways:

    – The sites that showed an increase in their Mobile SEO Visibility were leveraging site builds for dedicated mobile sites and responsive designed sites

    – The one dynamically served site hasn’t seen clear benefit nor any detriment to its Mobile SEO Visibility levels

    – Traffic levels for all sites do not yet show clear increased levels

    – We’re only a little over a week since the update was announced; there’s a good chance we’ll begin to see latent traffic increases towards the beginning to middle of May – and beyond

    Google’s John Mueller weighed in on the lack of a major impact from the update in Webmaster Central hangout (via Search Engine Roundtable).

    Here’s what he had to say on the subject:

    I think one of the difficulties here is that it is a very broad change. So while it’s had a fairly big impact across all the search results, it doesn’t mean that in every search result you will see very big changes. So that is something that affects a lot of different sites, a lot of different queries, but it is not such that the sites disappear from the search results completely if they are not mobile friendly.

    On the one hand, that makes a lot of sense for the sites that aren’t able to go mobile friendly yet, maybe like small businesses who don’t have the time or the money to set their sites for that. These are results that are still fairly relevant in the search results, so we need to keep them in there some how.

    The other aspect that we noticed is that a lot of sites really moved forward on going mobile. So where we expected essentially a little bit of a bigger change, because of maybe bigger sites that weren’t mobile friendly, did take the time to go mobile friendly and with that, they didn’t see that much of a change.

    While the immediate impact may not have been felt far and wide in a “mobilegeddon” sense, that doesn’t mean sites won’t continue to see effects from this as other sites continue to make their sites mobile-friendly. Even early winners from the update could find their content knocked back down when competing pages go mobile-friendly in the future.

    As Vivid Seats SEO director Bryson Meunier makes the case, “Mobilegeddon is beginning, not ending.”

    A survey from gShift last month, ahead of the update’s roll-out, found that 52% of businesses polled expected their sites to be impacted by the update. 65% indicated they were factoring mobile SEO into their content strategies, which means that another 35% were not.

    This week, Google announced the launch of the new Search Analytics report in Google Webmaster Tools. While it can be used on a much broader basis, one thing Google suggested using it for is for looking at how your site has been affected by the mobile-friendly update.

    Were you affected by the update in any noticeable way? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Google

  • Google Is Replacing The Most Used Feature In Webmaster Tools

    Google Is Replacing The Most Used Feature In Webmaster Tools

    Google announced the release of the new Search Analytics report in Webmaster Tools, which it promises will deliver webmasters more precise data. It is replacing the Search Queries report, which the company says is the most used feature in Webmaster Tools.

    “If you manage a website, you need a deep understanding of how users find your site and how your content appears on Google’s search results,” says Google’s Zineb Ait Bahajji “Until now, this data was shown in the Search Queries report, probably the most used feature in Webmaster Tools. Over the years, we’ve been listening to your feedback and features requests. How many of you wished they could compare traffic on desktop and mobile? How many of you needed to compare metrics in different countries? or in two different time frames?”

    The new report is designed to help you solve such problems. You can break down your site’s search data and filter it in “many different ways”. Google specifically suggests using it to compare your mobile traffic before and after the big Google Mobile-Friendly update (Mobilegeddon).

    You can use it to find the countries where people search most for your brand by choosing impressions, filtering by your brand name, and grouping results by country.

    These are just a couple examples Google gave, but you should be able to do a lot more with the report than that.

    “There are some differences between Search Analytics and Search Queries,” Bahajji notes. “Data in the Search Analytics report is much more accurate than data in the older Search Queries report, and it is calculated differently. To learn more read out Search Analytics Help Center article’s section about data. Because we understand that some of you will still need to use the old report, we’ve decided to leave it available in Google Webmaster Tools for three additional months. To learn more about the new report, please read our Search Analytics Help Center article.”

    The default view of the report shows your site’s click count coming from Google search results for the previous four weeks. Just select one or more metric checkboxes at the top to change what it shows. Clicks, Impressions, CTR, and Position are the available metrics.

    Images via Google

  • Google Universal Search Trends You Should Be Paying Attention To

    Google Universal Search Trends You Should Be Paying Attention To

    The appearance of Google’s Product Listing Ads (PLAs) in search results grew by 118% throughout last year, according to a new study by Searchmetrics. The study also found that video results are blended into 55% of keyword search results ‒ with four in five of the videos coming from YouTube.

    Have you been seeing more results from Google services lately? Let us know in the comments.

    “Overall a key takeaway is that Google’s own products (Google PLAs, YouTube videos and Google Maps) are becoming more prominent in Universal Search,” a spokesperson for Searchmetrics tells WebProNews.

    The company looked at search results for “millions” of keywords and analyzed the appearance of Shopping, Video, Image, News and Map integrations. Overall, they found that four out of five keywords produced at least one Universal Search integration. Video was the most frequent, appearing in search results for 55% of keywords analyzed. Images appeared in 40%, while PLAs appeared in 16%. News results appeared in 13% and Maps results appeared in 7%.

    Searchmetrics put out this infographic illustrating its findings:

    The Growing Presence of PLAs

    The biggest story here is the increase PLAs have seen, particularly as this has been a hot topic with Google’s European antitrust investigation situation.

    “In the case of Google I am concerned that the company has given an unfair advantage to its own comparison shopping service, in breach of EU antitrust rules,” said EU Commissioner in charge of competition policy Margrethe Vestager last month. “Google now has the opportunity to convince the Commission to the contrary. However, if the investigation confirmed our concerns, Google would have to face the legal consequences and change the way it does business in Europe.”

    According to Searchmetrics, “The share of Google Shopping PLA integrations more than doubled over the year, with the proportion of keywords for which at least one Google Shopping integration was displayed rising from 7.5% to 16% between January and December 2014 (there was a dip in the summer months, possibly because of the seasonal retail market slowdown). In total, Google Shopping PLA integrations account for 44% of all integrations shown across the millions of keywords analyzed – more than any other integration.”

    “The growth in the proportion of keywords for which Google Shopping Integrations are displayed represent increasing opportunities for retailers to buy Product Listing Ads and for Google to generate income from the now paid for Google Shopping service,” said Marcus Tober, CTO and founder of Searchmetrics.

    Video

    The firm’s video findings continue to to validate an increased focus on the medium on the part of businesses and marketers. While the percentage of search results pages showing video results actually fell over the course of 2014, videos appear more often than anything else by far.

    80% of videos displayed in Universal Search results came from YouTube. This certainly illustrates how important YouTube still is to marketing as Facebook has become a huge rival to the service.

    We recently looked at a study from Visible Measures, which found that for brands posting video campaigns to both channels, Facebook dominates viewership in the short term, but YouTube continues do so over the course of the video lifecycle. Search is obviously a big part of that.

    “If something is hot and of the moment, such as a newly released campaign, the Super Bowl, or even a cultural phenomenon like Fifty Shades of Grey, Facebook and similar social media sites are incredibly effective for driving the spread of timely content due to the trending nature of the News Feed,” said Visible Measures CEO Brian Shin. “But the strength of Facebook to promote trending content also highlights how powerful YouTube remains as a platform for continued viewership.”

    “Content discovery on Facebook is very much dependent on the Facebook News Feed, which is a function of what a user’s friends are sharing, as well as recommendations based on trends and a user’s interests. Because discovery is so dependent on sharing, viewership soon after content gets hot’ is strongest on Facebook,” Visible Measures added. “Conversely, YouTube acts as a depository for video and millions of users go there first, or arrive via Google search, to find video content. This user paradigm enables videos to have a much longer shelf-life on YouTube.”

    Meanwhile, a study from Advertiser Perceptions and the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) found that 68% of marketers and agency execs expect their digital video ad budgets to increase over the course of the next year.

    Maps

    While the number of results returning maps content in Universal Search integrations is still much smaller than the numbers for videos, images, and PLAs, it’s worth noting that there’s significant growth here. In January 2014 only 2% of search terms delivered map integrations, but it was at 7% by December.

    “The more frequent appearance of map integrations in search results may be due to the fact that Google is skewing search engine results pages in favor of localized results which are becoming more important as search results become increasingly individual and more searches are conducted on mobile devices,” said Tober.

    Indeed, Google said in a blog post on Tuesday that more Google searches now take place on mobile devices than on computers in 10 countries including the US and Japan.

    What do you think about the direction Google’s search results pages are heading in? Discuss.

    Image via Searchmetrics

  • Is This How Google Is Going To Use Tweets?

    Is This How Google Is Going To Use Tweets?

    It looks like Google’s new Twitter integration might be starting to take effect, with one possible format seen in the wild on Android.

    Are you looking forward to Google utilizing Twitter more? Discuss.

    Earlier this year, it came to light that Google and Twitter struck a new deal that would see Google indexing tweets in real time and that tweets would become more visible in Google’s search results as soon as they’re posted. During Twitter’s earnings conference call last week, CEO Dick Costolo said that the new integration would roll out in May. That was as specific as he got. It looks like some users may already be seeing some of that integration.

    Read: Google’s Twitter Update Is About To Hit: Here’s What Businesses Should Be Thinking About

    Search Engine Land has a screenshot of what appears to be an eight-minute old tweet from Gary Valenciano about the Mayweather/Pacquiao fight, which was apparently surfaced through a related search. It appears under a CNN result and its accompanying “more news for mayweather pacquiao” option. The Twitter result comes with a “feedback” link, indicating that the feature is a work in progress. There’s also a screenshot with a tweet fro Steve Benfrey in results for Carly Fiorina.

    Barry Schwartz, who was tipped with the screenshot by Razorfish’s Dan Martin, writes, “He told me he sees it happening on and off on his Android device for many trending topics right now, such as [maythe4thbewithyou], [Carly Fiorina], [Jimmy Greaves] and other searches. I personally cannot replicate this on any of my devices, but it would not surprise me if Google is now testing this and may roll it out any day.”

    Trying these searches on my own Android device, I’m not seeing the style shown in the screenshot. I did get this for “maythe4thbewithyou,” but that appears to be more app indexing related:

    As you may know, Google also recently turned app indexing into a ranking signal (and even expanded that signal further a couple weeks ago).

    Read: Google Does More With Recently Added Ranking Signal

    The above screenshot actually illustrates how that particular update might also help Twitter, who made the Google deal to drive more traffic to its service, which has been struggling to grow its user base fast enough to please investors. Even if Google doesn’t show sufficient real time tweets as a result of its Twitter integration, it may still point users to fresh Twitter content by way of the Twitter app.

    It’s unclear if anyone is seeing the new Twitter integration on non-Android devices, and to what extent the feature is being seen by users at all.

    Asked about the integration, a Google spokesperson told WebProNews, “As mentioned in Twitter’s earnings call back in January, we’ve partnered to bring their real-time content to Google Search. We’ve started some small experiments in mobile search, but we don’t have more to announce at this point.”

    They didn’t elaborate beyond that. Is this the extent of what the deal is going to bring to the table, or is this just one of multiple possible integrations? My guess is the latter.

    Beyond integrations directly into the search results, it’s possible that Google will also be getting more data from the tweets when it comes to ranking the content that they point to.

    We recently looked at some findings from Stone Temple Consulting, which analyzed Twitter’s past use of tweets, and found links in tweets having a significant impact.

    “Google still loves links. 26% of the tweets with an inbound link from sites other than Twitter got indexed. That is nearly 4 times as much as the overall average rate of indexation,” said Eric Enge in the report, adding that link quantity correlates highly with a tweet getting indexed.

    They found that out of 21 accounts and 91 tweets with with over 100 inbound links, 46% were indexed. The number goes down the less inbound links there are. Those with less than ten links only saw a 7% index rate.

    We later had a discussion with Enge, who said, “As you may know, there are many sites out there that simply replicate lots of tweets on their sites. I am not sure what value they serve, or if any people actually visit such sites. But, some of the links tweets get come from such sites, and my bet is that Google ignores those.”

    “However, there are other sites that may reference tweets within a blog post or article, and link in a clean traditional web link based fashion to the URL for the tweet itself…it is these links that I believe that Google is placing a high value on.”

    It’s also possible that having access to Twitter’s firehose will enable Google to better rank fresh articles based on the Twitter activity they get. They’ll at least be able to look at that as a more significant signal with the real time element coming into play.

    Google completed the roll-out of its big mobile-friendly algorithm update late last week. At the time, the company indicated that it wasn’t finished indexing everything. Google also recently indicated that its doorway page update had completed its roll out.

    Do you see the Twitter integration as a positive for Google results? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Note: This article has been updated from its original form.

  • Google Mobile-Friendly Update Completes Roll-Out

    Google Mobile-Friendly Update Completes Roll-Out

    It appears that Google’s mobile-friendly update has fully rolled out, but as of Friday morning, not all pages had been indexed yet, so it’s possible that you’ll still see effects from it that haven’t taken place just yet. That said, it sounds like the impact of the update is far less significant than the “Mobilegeddon” headlines would have had you believe.

    Google webmaster trends analyst Gary Illyes tweeted that the algorithm is rolled out, but that not all pages were reindexed yet, so they don’t have the new scores yet (via Barry Schwartz):

    And on the impact:

    As we’ve said over and over again leading up to the update, while mobile-friendliness is obviously important ranking signal to consider, it’s still just one of over 200 that Google uses.

    If you haven’t had the chance to go mobile-friendly yet, you can do it anytime, and will send Google the right signal. Learn all about how to do so here.

    Image via Google

  • Google’s Twitter Update Is About To Hit

    Google’s Twitter Update Is About To Hit

    Long story short, what you say and what others say about you on Twitter may start mattering a lot more.

    Do you expect to benefit from Google’s coming Twitter integration? Let us know in the comments.

    We learned in February that Google and Twitter struck a new deal that will see Google indexing tweets in real time. Initial reports indicated that tweets would become visible in Google’s search results as soon as they’re posted, starting in the first half of this year. Now, we’ve got a more specific timeframe.

    In a conference call to discuss Twitter’s earnings, CEO Dick Costolo revealed that the integration will begin its roll-out next month. Given that April is just about over, that could potentially be as early as this week.

    “I don’t have a specific date for you, but now I can at least give you a specific month,” said Costolo. “And that Google deal is all about…that relationship is about driving our total audience strategy. The goal is that people consume content and engage with that content whether they log in or not.”

    Twitter Needs More Eyeballs

    Since going public in 2013, Twitter has faced immense pressure to grow its user base, and that growth has been quite slow. While the company did manage to add 14 million users over the last quarter, it only just surpassed its 300 million monthly active user milestone. For comparison, Facebook just reported 1.44 billion. Twitter has been exploring different ways to grow its MAUs, and much of that has been focused on improving the experience for logged out users.

    Earlier this month, Twitter launched a homepage redesign. For logged in users, the homepage remains the user’s home timeline, but for logged out users, it’s now a user-friendly directory of categorized content. Twitter has for all intents and purposes turned its logged-out homepage into a news site.

    The Google deal is another way (and likely a pretty significant one) to get people to realize more value from the service even if they’ve not been frequent users in the past. The narrative around Twitter’s stock every time the company reports its earnings is always shareholder disappointment, so the importance of the Google deal cannot be overstated from Twitter’s corporate perspective.

    The two companies, as you may know, used to have a similar relationship, but when the original deal expired, the companies were unable to reach an agreement to keep it going.

    “I would say that the way we think about the Google deal now without again — without going into any of the details distinct from the kind of relationship we had in the past is that we’ve got the opportunity now to drive a lot of attention to an aggregate eye balls if you will to these logged out experiences, topics and events that we plan on delivering on the front page of Twitter,” Costolo said on a previous earnings call ahead of the new homepage roll-out. “And that’s one of the reasons this makes a lot more sense for us now.”

    What’s in store?

    Little is known about why exactly that relationship fell apart, but the most logical explanation is that the pre-public Twitter thought it was worth more than what Google was willing to pay for access to Twitter’s firehose of realtime tweets. Google had even built a feature for its search results pages -Realtime Search – around the deal. It used to display a box of scrolling realtime results, which included tweets as well as content from other sources, on search results pages for newsy queries.

    Once the Twitter deal went away, so did the feature, making it clear that the tweets were the only real valuable part of that. This also illustrated how valuable the deal was for Google, as its absence highlighted a failure of Google’s stated mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible. With so much of the world’s information now flooding the internet in real time, Google could hardly make good on that mission without the access it once had.

    Google isn’t expected to implement tweets the same way it used to when the new integration goes into effect.

    “I don’t think that this is what Google is looking for,” search marketer Eric Enge recently told WebProNews. “I suspect that the UI impact will be minimal, but that more tweets will get indexed. However (and this is a big however), what will really be interesting to see is if Google uses tweet data to help drive personalization in one fashion or another. One simple way to do this? Simply favor content that people link to from their tweets in future related search results.”

    “This type of prioritization is similar to what they do with Google+ already,” he added. “This is just speculation on my part, but I think it could be a huge win for Google if this deal gives them enough visibility to allow them to do that.”

    We’ll see if either company makes a big announcement about how Google will handle tweets or if we’ll just start seeing the tweets surface more.

    How Google has been using tweets

    Earlier this year, Enge and his firm Stone Temple Consulting released some findings about how Google indexes tweets currently, which provides some insight into how things may change when the new deal goes into effect. His team analyzed over 133,000 tweets to see how Google indexed them, and found that about 7.4% of them were actually indexed, leaving 92.6% completely left out of the search engine.

    The findings suggested that Twitter accounts with larger follower counts are getting more tweets indexed, though it may be only a correlation. Enge said he doesn’t think Google is looking specifically at follower count, but that other signals are affecting which profiles get indexed more (i.e. links to those accounts’ profiles). Either way, he noted, more value is clearly being placed on the authoritative accounts.

    Out of the accounts with over a million followers that the research looked at, there were 13,435 tweets with 21% of them being indexed by Google. Out of 44,318 tweets in the 10K to 1M follower range, only 10% were indexed. For 80,842 tweets from accounts with less than 10,000 followers, just 4% were indexed.

    Stone Temple said images and/or hashtags seem to increase a tweet’s chances of getting indexed with percentages registering higher than average. Mentions, on the other hand, register negatively. It also points to another of its studies, which showed that links from third-party sites have a significant impact.

    “Google still loves links. 26% of the tweets with an inbound link from sites other than Twitter got indexed. That is nearly 4 times as much as the overall average rate of indexation,” Enge said in the report, adding that link quantity correlates highly with a tweet getting indexed.

    They found that out of 21 accounts and 91 tweets with with over 100 inbound links, 46% were indexed. The number goes down the less inbound links there are. Those with less than ten links only saw a 7% index rate.

    “What our study showed is that Google currently places minimal impact on freshness of tweets today,” Enge told WebProNews in February. “Perhaps when crawling needs to be done to discover them it’s just not worth it, and it might be that the new deal will change that. However, I suspect that it’s not the tweets themselves that Google really values the most, but the content they link to that Google wants to discover more quickly. That said, if they see a tweet getting major engagement, chances probably would go up that this tweet will show up higher in the results.”

    Your reputation on the line?

    Businesses may have reputation-related issues to be concerned about when the deal takes effect.

    “The biggest challenge and opportunity for businesses using Twitter for customer service is that every interaction is now amplified,” Conversocial CEO Joshua March told us last month. “Whether that’s a complaint from a customer or the company’s response, the agreement between Google and Twitter places a greater spotlight on each interaction.”

    “When a customer is searching on Google for a business, Tweets from customers about issues or bad service experiences could be on the front page,” he said. “If businesses have a social first approach to customer service then they can tackle these quickly and head on, creating positive engagements that will show up instead. This deal has the potential to accelerate the kind of service-related Twitter crises many brands have already experienced.”

    The key word there is potential. Until we see Google’s approach to the integration, any of this is only speculative. However, these are important points for businesses to keep in mind as the integration approaches.

    “For companies with a social first approach who are committed to delivering excellent, fast and authentic social customer service, the agreement between Google and Twitter has the ability to spotlight them, and make it very obvious to customers that they care,” said March. “Companies that have successfully integrated various social media into their customer service DNA should be very excited by the agreement. In addition, previously addressed concerns are now searchable, allowing customers to potentially self-help.”

    Businesses are going to have to consider that any tweets related to their brands could become more visible, as could tweets from employees. In fact, even beyond the Google deal, Twitter is doing other things that could inflate visibility through search.

    This goes beyond Google

    Google already has a firehose deal in place with Bing.

    Twitter is also working with Apple. During Tuesday’s conference call, Costolo said, “And finally, we are also working with Apple to surface great Twitter content and accounts directly in Spotlight Search on iOS and OS X, that also makes it easier and quicker to find great things on Twitter. So I would sum up by saying, there is absolutely an opportunity to go and monetize that attention and traffic. We want to make sure we iterate on the experiences to get them right first.”

    Update: Apple’s spotlight search is reportedly already surfacing Twitter content.

    Twitter clearly wants (and needs) to have its content surfaced as much as possible, so look for it to find other partnerships to fuel this as well.

    The company is also experimenting with its own search interface, which could emphasize the power of that to more people as it continues to court and retain new users. We recently looked at a redesign it’s been testing, and while Twitter would not confirm that it will roll out to all users, it’s clearly an improvement from the existing interface, so I would be shocked if it doesn’t.

    There’s not much change in terms of functionality, but the way things are laid out and labeled are significantly improved, and could draw some new attention to Twitter Search. For a deeper dive into this interface, read this.

    Twitter also recently started indexing every public tweet from the last 8 years, so there’s that too.

    Are you looking forward to the Google/Twitter deal taking effect? How should Google approach the data? Discuss.

    Images via Wikimedia Commons, Twitter

  • Impacted By Google’s Mobile-Friendly Update?

    Impacted By Google’s Mobile-Friendly Update?

    On April 21, Google began rolling out its mobile-friendly update, which makes the mobile-friendliness of a site a ranking signal. It has largely become known as “Mobilegeddon” by publications with a flare for the dramatic, as this name was given to it before it even launched or its effects were even felt.

    Were you prepared for the update? Was it “Mobilegeddon” for your site? Have you noticed any change (positive or negative) so far? Let us know in the comments.

    As expected, Searchmetrics has released a list of winners and losers from the update. Given that the update likely hasn’t finished rolling out yet, even Searchmetrics itself cautions that these are only preliminary results.

    Following are the lists, which were first posted on Saturday.

    The preliminary losers:

    Domain Mobile SEO Visibility actual loss in percent Ratio Mobile vs Desktop
    reddit.com 874108 -27% -36%
    nbcsports.com 139213 -28% -40%
    songlyrics.com 111042 -26% -47%
    youngmoney.com 10602 -76% -77%
    fool.com 78599 -27% -49%
    isitdownrightnow.com 83067 -25% -49%
    tested.com 3243 -89% -18%
    sidereel.com 88851 -22% -44%
    census.gov 71234 -23% -53%
    onlinecreditcenter2.com 33026 -38% -39%
    odir.us 75586 -21% -15%
    boxofficemojo.com 39951 -33% -64%
    schoolloop.com 50046 -27% -50%
    interviewmagazine.com 42280 -31% -32%
    locatetv.com 65460 -21% -53%
    fnfismd.com 54730 -23% -30%
    etymonline.com 25169 -39% -77%
    reviewjournal.com 22769 -41% -40%
    thinkexist.com 15514 -49% -68%
    sciencedaily.com 45017 -23% -45%
    majorgeeks.com 40374 -24% -53%
    movie25.ag 16324 -44% -43%
    thefind.com 2448 -84% -49%
    megashare.sc 48082 -20% -64%
    walmartstores.com 27157 -31% -31%
    thefiscaltimes.com 4940 -71% -81%
    brassring.com 38315 -24% -46%
    google.es 5830 -67% -26%
    epguides.com 32037 -27% -53%
    krebsonsecurity.com 10451 -52% -42%
    sheppardsoftware.com 39140 -22% -55%
    upworthy.com 17146 -38% -26%
    jobs.net 34174 -23% -31%
    apples4theteacher.com 30268 -25% -34%
    mmo-champion.com 2948 -78% -77%
    webcrawler.com 36291 -21% -36%
    moreofit.com 35610 -21% -46%
    hid.im 14776 -40% -43%
    webs.com 9237 -51% -54%
    ft.com 27984 -25% -42%
    paroles-musique.com 15220 -37% -62%
    jcpportraits.com 14936 -37% -32%
    lottostrategies.co 2717 -76% -63%
    searchbug.com 8885 -49% -17%
    usps.gov 33186 -20% -25%
    ondvdreleases.com 4058 -68% -17%
    barchart.com 10435 -44% -55%
    genealogybank.com 26451 -24% -53%
    sketchup.com 18633 -30% -19%
    zeropaid.com 2550 -76% -74%
    edx.org 13439 -37% -30%

    The Preliminary winners:

    Domain Mobile SEO Visibility actual gain in percent Ratio Mobile vs Desktop
    tvtropes.org 290528 420% 23%
    foreignaffairs.com 153528 771% 37%
    gq.com 178364 67% 19%
    w3snoop.com 104573 91% 108%
    knowyourmeme.com 153154 32% 13%
    bandcamp.com 272302 13% 12%
    fbschedules.com 133754 31% 11%
    washingtontimes.com 173354 21% 12%
    ipaddress.com 89830 51% 71%
    imgur.com 118307 32% 24%
    free-tv-video-online.info 71972 65% 38%
    quora.com 251746 13% 28%
    lyricsmania.com 229221 14% 12%
    foreignpolicy.com 56583 83% 18%
    wtvr.com 43562 124% 67%
    sports-reference.com 58155 65% 10%
    refinery29.com 100977 29% 19%
    macmillandictionary.com 150033 17% 12%
    hitfix.com 75004 42% 28%
    zacks.com 87375 33% 14%
    motherjones.com 200106 12% 14%
    dslreports.com 82131 32% 28%
    allposters.com 67786 39% 11%
    rt.com 89352 26% 10%
    easycounter.com 38134 87% 15%
    change.org 89739 23% 11%
    newrepublic.com 129003 15% 15%
    boostmobile.com 54172 40% 11%
    stream-tv1.net 18126 548% 151%
    newsweek.com 110915 16% 17%
    iconosquare.com 93694 19% 31%
    watch-series-tv.to 65776 28% 13%
    websta.me 112232 14% 23%
    800-numbers.net 76397 22% 23%
    hypestat.com 30643 81% 172%
    pcgamer.com 77815 21% 24%
    nybooks.com 95426 16% 20%
    advanceautoparts.com 90342 17% 25%
    radio.com 53584 32% 11%
    newmexicocriminallaw.com 13363 4012% 30%
    mp3skull.to 35886 56% 143%
    religionfacts.com 24257 107% 24%
    thinkprogress.org 64598 22% 20%
    wikimedia.org 92805 15% 28%
    microcenter.com 41385 39% 13%
    kochdavis.com 14444 408% 181%
    mixcloud.com 32295 56% 89%
    topix.com 114888 11% 12%
    fox2now.com 35422 42% 23%
    kcci.com 24271 75% 64%
    grist.org 20662 100% 30%
    stemfireandems.com 10752 2072% 49%
    shazam.com 30850 45% 103%
    eurogamer.net 45327 26% 49%

    You can see SearchMetrics’ findings in a PDF here. They’re also updating data as the roll-out continues, so you can see the latest here.

    The effects of “Mobilegeddon” do have the potential to be felt by many sites who haven’t paid attention to Google’s warning. The update was officially announced in February, and was hinted at for months before that. Google has given webmasters time to prepare.

    Small businesses who don’t have the time or resources to dedicate to making their sites mobile-friendly, or even pay attention to the latest happenings in SEO, are likely to be hurt by the update the most. All of that said, this is still just one of over 200 signals Google is taking into account when ranking search results on mobile devices. It’s not everything. It’s also on a URL-by-URL basis, and is supposed to update in near real time, so webmasters can fix pages over time, and potentially increase their rankings without waiting months for Google to recognize these fixes, as they have with some other updates.

    Last week, Lawyer.com, a site which helps people find law firms, announced that it had analyzed the law sites in its database, and found that many of them will likely be affected negatively by Google’s update. 46% of solo firms failed Google’s requirements, it said, while larger firms did a little better with a 33% failure rate.

    The reality is that the update shouldn’t affect any particular vertical more than the next. It’s not like Panda where it is specifically looking at the type of content. It’s strictly looking at technical elements that enable the content to be consumed on a mobile device with ease. Even if your content completely sucks, it can pass Google’s mobile-friendly test. It may not help you with other signals, but that’s a different story.

    Last week, Google put its latest round of guidance related to the update. This included an FAQ. The important takeaways from that included:

    – The update does not affect searches on tablets or desktops, and it’s a page-level change. Only mobile-friendly pages will be able to get a boost as a direct result of the change.

    – Google determines whether or not a page is mobile-friendly every time it’s crawled, so webmasters won’t have to wait for another update after they fix a page for it to get the advantage of the signal. This also means that if you weren’t quite ready for the update today, it shouldn’t be that big a deal as long as you can still fix what need’s fixing.

    – Google is saying now that the roll-out should take “a week or so”. You can’t determine whether or not you’ve been impacted on April 22.

    – If your pages are designed to work well on mobile devices, but aren’t passing Google’s mobile-friendly test, it’s probably because you’re blocking Googlebot for smartphones from crawling resources like JavaScript and CSS. This is the most common reason that happens.

    – You can still link to sites that Google doesn’t consider mobile-friendly without fear of repercussions.

    “It’s not the best experience for mobile visitors to go from a mobile-friendly page to a desktop-only page, but hopefully as more sites become mobile-friendly, this will become less of a problem,” says Google’s Maile Ohye.

    – Mobile-friendliness is assessed the same regardless of whether a site is using responsive design, separate mobile URLs, or dynamic serving.

    – It’s naive to think you don’t need to worry about the signal because you think your audience is desktop-only. More and more people are using mobile devices more as time goes on. Even if they’re mostly desktop-only now, that doesn’t mean it will stay that way.

    – Pages with the old style of object YouTube embeds may register as not mobile-friendly. Make sure pages are using the newer iframe embeds.

    – For tap target size, Google suggests a minimum of 7mm width/height for primary targets and a minimum margin of 5mm between secondary ones.

    You an also read this for additional guidance on how to improve your site’s mobile-friendliness.

    What do you think of Google’s update? Has it made search results better? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Google

  • Google’s Mobile-Friendly Reportedly Hurting Law Sites

    Google’s Mobile-Friendly Reportedly Hurting Law Sites

    This week, Google began rolling out its dreaded mobile-friendly update. It’s unclear exactly how long it will take for the roll-out to complete, but it sounds like it will be at least a full week, based on what Google has said.

    The company did indicate that it has rolled out completely in at least some of its data centers.

    “So that is something where I think you will probably see that change over the course of a week, maybe a week and a half – something like that,” said Google’s John Mueller in a webmaster hangout. “From the first day to the next day, I don’t think you’ll see a big change. But if you compare last week to next week, then you should see a big change.”

    While it’s still early to know what kinds of businesses are going to be impacted most, it does appear that law sites might get hit pretty hard.

    Of course it’s not like the update is targeting any particular vertical, but law firm search engine Lawyer.com says it has reviewed mobile readiness across its database of over 100,000 U.S. law firm sites using Google’s mobile-friendly test on April 21, and found that 46% of solo firms failed Google’s requirements. Larger firms did a bit better with a 33% failure rate. The site says:

    Websites for Texas-based law firms passed Google’s tests 68% of the time compared to only 65% for California-based law firms and 61% for both New York and Florida-based firms. Male owned solo firms passed slightly more often than female owned solo firms with rates of 60% and 58%, respectively. Websites of solo lawyers 50 years or older had a 54% pass rate while sites of younger solo lawyers reached 55%. Personal Injury law firms had the highest pass rate of all major practice areas (67%), while Real Estate firms had a low pass rate at only 57%. Patent law firms, which often have tech savvy partners, surprisingly had a low pass rate of just 44%.

    Home pages of three of the top-five grossing law firms in the U.S. failed Google’s mobile-friendly test; Latham & Watkins, Skadden Arps, and Clifford Chance all have websites that can expect organic search traffic declines until adding responsive design elements. Google has indicated that drops in traffic will not be reflected immediately and may take over a week for indexing to occur.

    “Making the necessary adjustments is extremely important for business websites in any industry,” said Lawyer.com CEO Gerald Gorman. “It is especially important in the legal services industry as most users now start their Lawyer search on Google using a mobile phone or tablet.”

    SEO Clarity is keeping score on what’s happening with the update here. On the third day of the roll-out, it reported that out of 50,000 keywords it analyzed and the associated 60,000 domains appearing in the Top 10 results in Google’s desktop and mobile SERPs, that day showed a 0.5% change in the opposite direction.

    Image via Google

  • Google Penguin Turns 3, Still Frustrates Webmasters

    Google Penguin Turns 3, Still Frustrates Webmasters

    The Google Penguin Update is now three years old (hat tip to Barry Schwartz for keeping tabs on the “holiday”). The update has been the bane of many SEOs’ and webmasters’ existence for all this time, and things really haven’t gotten a whole lot better for some of them, despite promises from Google.

    The reason the update exists – to fight webspam – is important, and it’s certainly a problem that needed to be addressed in the search results, but there’s no consensus on how well it’s been executed, and a great deal of frustration has lingered, largely due to how hard it can be to recover from getting hit by the update, even when the necessary changes have been made to a site.

    The reason it is so hard to recover is that Google refreshes Penguin so infrequently. Affected sites must wait until Google releases Penguin again before they can recover, and that could take months. If you’re trying to run a business and rely on Google for traffic, good luck with that.

    The last Penguin update happened in October, with Google making some adjustments to it over the following couple months, but that’s it. We’re now nearly a third of the way through the year, and nothing so far. In December, Google indicated that the Penguin update would probably just continue indefinitely. That came after Google said the latest Penguin would be a “delight” because it would update more frequently.

    In a recent Webmaster hangout, Google’s John Mueller commented that he doesn’t think either Panda or Penguin are currently updating data regularly. So much for that.

    A few months ago, we had a conversation with link expert Eric Ward about the evolution of links and link building. Asked about how linking has changed compared to the pre-Penguin area, he said, ““Once Google aimed its scope at backlink profiles, and more specifically what it considered to be unnatural backlink profiles, it was truly a game changer. For the first time the links pointing to your site could end up hurting you rather than helping you or simply being ignored. The impact of that change cannot be underestimated.”

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Google “Believes” The Doorway Page Algorithm Update Has Rolled Out

    Google “Believes” The Doorway Page Algorithm Update Has Rolled Out

    Last month, Google announced that it’s cracking down on doorway pages with a new ranking adjustment. At the time, the company said this would launch soon, but didn’t give an exact time frame.

    It appears that now, the update has already been rolled out. SEOs and webmasters have apparently been largely unable to tell if the the update ever launched, but the subject came up in a Webmaster hangout with Google’s John Mueller, in which he said, “I believe that has rolled out, yea.”

    You never really get a firm answer on these things from Mueller. It’s always “I think” or “I believe,” and sometimes that has led to seemingly contradictory statements from Google, but unless we hear otherwise, we’re just going to have to assume that Mueller is right.

    Here’s the video (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable, a known forum tracker, says he’s been tracking a “ton of forums” (both whitehat and blackhat), and people are still asking if the update has really launched.

    In case you’re wondering what this update means exactly, doorway pages have historically been known as pages created specifically to get in search results for various queries, and then send users to a different page.

    This practice has long been against Google’s quality guidelines, but that’s hardly stopped people from trying it. In 2005, Google’s Matt Cutts advised people not to hire an “assclown SEO that makes doorway pages with sneaky redirects,” and that advice still holds up today, apparently more than ever.

    Five years ago, Google started sending webmasters messages when Webmaster Tools detected doorway pages on their sites.

    “We have a long-standing view that doorway pages that [are] created solely for search engines can harm the quality of the user’s search experience,” says Brian White from Google’s Webspam team. “For example, searchers might get a list of results that all go to the same site. So if a user clicks on one result, doesn’t like it, and then tries the next result in the search results page and is taken to that same site that they didn’t like, that’s a really frustrating experience.”

    Google has “freshened” its definition of doorway pages in the Quality Guidelines:

    Doorways are sites or pages created to rank highly for specific search queries. They are bad for users because they can lead to multiple similar pages in user search results, where each result ends up taking the user to essentially the same destination. They can also lead users to intermediate pages that are not as useful as the final destination.

    Here are some examples of doorways:

    Having multiple domain names or pages targeted at specific regions or cities that funnel users to one page

    Pages generated to funnel visitors into the actual usable or relevant portion of your site(s)

    Substantially similar pages that are closer to search results than a clearly defined, browseable hierarchy.

    Remember when Google launched the Panda update, and gave webmasters a list of questions they could ask themselves to determine if a page is high quality? Last month, they provided a list of questions to determine if your pages may be seen as doorway pages:

    • Is the purpose to optimize for search engines and funnel visitors into the actual usable or relevant portion of your site, or are they an integral part of your site’s user experience?
    • Are the pages intended to rank on generic terms yet the content presented on the page is very specific?
    • Do the pages duplicate useful aggregations of items (locations, products, etc.) that already exist on the site for the purpose of capturing more search traffic?
    • Are these pages made solely for drawing affiliate traffic and sending users along without creating unique value in content or functionality?
    • Do these pages exist as an “island?” Are they difficult or impossible to navigate to from other parts of your site? Are links to such pages from other pages within the site or network of sites created just for search engines?

    “Over time, we’ve seen sites try to maximize their ‘search footprint’ without adding clear, unique value,” says White. “These doorway campaigns manifest themselves as pages on a site, as a number of domains, or a combination thereof.”

    According to White, sites with “large and well-established doorway campaigns” may notice a significant impact from the adjustment.

    This update hasn’t received nearly as much as attention as another major Google update that started rolling out this week. Businesses who don’t have mobile-friendly sites are going to start feeling the heat from that one if they haven’t already.