WebProNews

Tag: SEO

  • Study Looks At How Well Backlink Tools Work

    Study Looks At How Well Backlink Tools Work

    Stone Temple Consulting has been releasing a lot of great research in the SEO space throughout 2015. They’ve provided thoughtful analysis of Google’s use of Twitter in light of a deal between the two companies, Mobilegeddon, engagement on Google+, and Wikipedia’s Google performance.

    The latest, which should interest many businesses, looks at how well backlink tools perform.

    Do you find significant value in backlink tools? Let us know in the comments.

    “One of the most important pieces of data to SEO professionals is backlinks: not only the information on the sites linking to your own sites pages, but those linking to competitors and others ranking for valued keywords,” a spokesperson for Stone Temple tells WebProNews. “The challenge has been to get accurate complete, data.”

    “Each tool by itself discovered only between 50-60% of all backlinks, but combining the tools in aggregate brings that total to more than 80% of existing links,” the spokesperson says. “The upshot? No one tool does a great job by itself of discovering backlinks, but combining the results of multiple tools is much more helpful to support your SEO efforts.”

    The study specifically analyzed three leading backlink discovery tools: Moz Open Site Explorer, AHREFS Site Explorer, and Majestic SEO.

    They picked 20 sites with strong tendency to link out to other web pages in their content, implemented links that aren’t NoFollow, and have a “reasonable to high degree of prominence”. Specifically, they looked at the following sites: Yahoo.com, WashingtonPost.com, CNET.com, HuffingtonPost.com, Wired.com, BBC.com, TechCrunch.com, TheAtlantic.com, USAToday.com, Slate.com, AdWeek.com, LifeHacker.com, Salon.com, TheDailyBeast.com, SearchEngineLand.com, Newsmax.com, RawStory.com, LifeHack.org, InTheseTimes, and TruthDig.com.

    The main takeaways from the research are that all three tools are competitive with one another when it comes to finding links, but none found all links. Using the tools together is the way to go, and there is evidence that the tools bias toward coverage on higher authority sites according to Stone Temple.

    Stone Temple’s Eric Enge explains the methodology in much more detail here.

    When it comes to links, websites are in store for some major shake-up in the new year when Google finally launches its long-awaited and “huge” Penguin update. This will be huge not in size of its initial impact, but in is ongoing impact on Google search as it will update in real time moving forward.

    Google recently indicated that the update will most likely hit in January, though you never know. They’ve been teasing it for a long time.

    What do you think of backlink tools? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Images via Stone Temple Consulting

  • Google Starts Indexing HTTPS Versions of URLs by Default

    Google Starts Indexing HTTPS Versions of URLs by Default

    Google announced the latest step in its “HTTPS everywhere” initiative in that it will now serve HTTPS versions of URLs by default in its search results.

    Google will start crawling HTTPS equivalents of HTTP pages, even when the HTTPS version isn’t linked to from any page. When both versions are available and have the same content, Google will choose the HTTPS URL in most cases.

    That is if it doesn’t contain insecure dependencies, isn’t blocked from crawling by robots.txt, doesn’t redirect users to or through an insecure HTTP page, doesn’t have a rel=”canonial” link to the HTTP page, doesn’t contain a noindex robots meta tag, and doesn’t have on-host outlinks to HTTP URLs.

    Google says it will also choose to index the HTTPS URL if the sitemap lists the HTTPS URL or doesn’t list the HTTP version and/or the server has a valid TSL certificate.

    Last year, Google started giving sites with HTTPS URLs a boost in rankings. This takes things a significant step forward.

    “Browsing the web should be a private experience between the user and the website, and must not be subject to eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle attacks, or data modification,” says Google’s Zineb Ait Bahajji. “This is why we’ve been strongly promoting HTTPS everywhere.”

    The company notes that while its systems prefer the HTTPS version of a URL by default, webmasters should also make things clearer for other search engines by redirecting their HTTP site to the HTTPS version and implementing the HSTS header on their server.

    Image via Google

  • Google Updates App Indexing Docs

    Google Updates App Indexing Docs

    App Indexing has become a very important thing to take into consideration and pay attention to when it comes to Google search on mobile devices and optimizing for that. This year, Google added it as a ranking signal and even expanded it as one since then. It also plays into other things such as the new Google Now on Tap feature of the latest Android release.

    Google announced in a Google+ update (via Search Engine Roundtable) that it has updated the documentation for app indexing.

    “Our app indexing docs have been spruced up with streamlined overview and instructions (there are no implementation changes),” it said.

    The changes are as follows:

    – Clearer product overview information

    – Better guidance on supporting URLs to your app

    – Emphasized using HTTP URLs and discouraging custom scheme URLs

    – Streamlined instructions on using the App Indexing API

    – Provided details about App Indexing API fields

    – Updated FAQs

    – Created release notes to keep partners updated of changes

    Again, there is no action required on the part of the developer.

    Image via Google

  • Google Penguin Update Probably Coming Next Month

    Google Penguin Update Probably Coming Next Month

    We heard for months that Google’s next Penguin update was likely to happen before the end of the year, but last week, the company finally admitted that this was not going to happen.

    The indication was that they were waiting for the holidays to be over, but it was unclear if that was the only factor. In other words, we don’t really know if it’s actually ready to go and they’re just waiting, or if it’s still not quite ready.

    From the sound of it, it’s still not QUITE ready, but is very close, and the latest word from Google is that it will probably come in January. Still no guarantee though.

    Search Engine Roundtable points us to a Google Webmaster Hangout in which Google trends analyst John Mueller says he’ confident it will happen next month. Here’s the quote (as transcribed by the site):

    Um, I don’t want to make any date promises but I am hopeful that things are lined up. Since it was kind of on the edge for this year, I’m pretty confident that that’s good enough for January. But I really don’t want to make any announcements on that.

    As you probably know by now, this Penguin update is supposed to go real-time, so it will continuously update without webmasters having to wait forever for a refresh if they happen to be impacted by it and need to make changes to their site to recover visibility in search results.

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Did Google Take Content From A Site And Link To Itself Instead?

    Did Google Take Content From A Site And Link To Itself Instead?

    As time has progressed over the years, Google has been showing more and more content on search results pages, resulting in people having to click over to third-party websites for fewer and fewer things.

    Do you think Google is improving the web by showing more content in its search results? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Google has been criticized for “scraping” content from websites for years, but it’s clear that the practice is showing no signs of slowing down.

    A recent study from Stone Temple Consulting looked at over 855,000 queries to see how many returned a rich answer box (of which there are several varieties). Based on the new findings, the growth in this type of result has been about 9% since February.

    “From an apples to apples perspective, the numbers grew from 22% in February to 31% now, so the growth was substantial,” a spokesperson for Stone Temple told WebProNews in October.

    Around this time last year, Google began showing song lyrics as one type of rich answer result. We assumed this would be a devastating blow to websites dedicated to this vertical.

    Google’s lyric results typically show some or all of the lyrics to a song, and include a link to Google Play where you can see the full lyrics, subscribe to Google’s service or simply buy the song. In effect, nearly every lyric search is an ad for a product you can buy from Google Play in addition to being an ad for Google Play in general.

    Now, Google has been busted appearing to have “scraped” lyrics to a song directly from one of the lyrics sites these results are replacing while still linking to its own Google Play store rather than the site it got them from. And on a likely high volume search at that.

    Adele’s song Hello is currently one of the most popular songs. When a user searches for “adele hello lyrics” they’re presented with this:

    Screen Shot 2015-12-08 at 9.40.06 AM

    At first glance, it looks just like any other result of this nature, but as others (Yvo Schaap, Barry Schwartz) have pointed out, there are some giveaways that indicate Google got this content from one of the big lyrics sites, Metrolyrics. Those giveaways are the inclusion of the numbers that appear at the end of some of the lines and the “byGuiTheGreat” part.

    The numbers refer to comments on Metrolyrics. While the numbers have increased since Google apparently grabbed the content, you can see that they’re placed at the same locations in the lyrics on Metrolyrics’ site:

    Screen Shot 2015-12-08 at 9.48.33 AM

    And guess who’s been leaving comments on this song on Metrolyrics:

    Screen Shot 2015-12-08 at 9.50.42 AM

    That’s right. GuiTheGreat.

    If Google is indeed getting this content from Metrolyrics, imagine how many page views that site is missing out on for this particular search by Google linking to Google Play instead of Metrolyrics. And what if this is happening for other searches? What if it expands to more categories beyond lyrics?

    In January, SearchMetrics released lists of the top winners and losers of 2014 in terms of search visibility. The “falling stars” list was littered with lyrics sites.

    eLyrics.net saw a 92% drop. LyricsMode and Sing365 each fell 60%. LyricsFreak dropped 59%. MetroLyrics dropped 12%. Last.fm, which links to MetroLyrics for song lyrics saw a decline of 18%.

    Keep in mind, this was only a month after Google began showing the lyrics in the first place, and nearly a year has passed since then – a year which based on Stone Temple’s findings has seen Google increase the amount of rich answers it shows in search results.

    In February, eLyrics.net confirmed its drop in search visibility to WebProNews, calling it “unfortunately true”. Interestingly, it attributed the drop in traffic not as much to Google showing lyrics on search results pages, but to both Panda and Penguin. It said it had not seen drop-off from other search engines, but only Google.

    Asked if the site would be able to survive without search traffic, eLyrics said, “I doubt that, but we are pushing hard to stay online.”

    They also said they had already decreased their number of staff.

    Is Google hurting the web with rich answers? What do you make of the alleged Metrolyrics scraping? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Lead image via Google

  • Google Penguin Update Delayed!

    Google Penguin Update Delayed!

    Well, we’re nearly a week into December now, so time is running out. You’re not going to see Google launc a Penguin update in 2015.

    Are you anxiously anticipating Google’s next Penguin launch? Let us know in the comments.

    Google has kept webmasters and SEOs expecting a new Penguin update before the end of the year for months, but alas, it is not to be.

    Search Engine Land is reporting that Google told them the update won’t be released until next year because of the holidays. Barry Scwhartz reports:

    A Google spokesperson told us today, “With the holidays upon us, it looks like the penguins won’t march until next year.”

    It’s unclear if that means it would be ready otherwise and what element of the holiday season is impeding its launch. It could be people taking vacation, or it could be that Google doesn’t want to upset the apple cart like it did with the infamous Florida update so long ago. It’s most likely the latter, because last year, there was Penguin-related activity around this time.

    But who knows? It could be something else entirely.

    The thing with releasing a significant update around the holidays is that this is obviously a major time of the year for many businesses and drastic shifts in search results can be devastating to those on the wrong end of it. Considering that Google’s updates tend to be far from perfect, it would be a shame to see businesses lose out on a lot of customers because of forces out of their control. If the algorithm were perfect and really only negatively impacted spammers that would be one thing, but what are the chances of that?

    One article on Penguin and Google’s delay caused a minor stir on Twitter. Jenny Halasz writes, “Google broke the Internet.” The article begins:

    Google told us today that the “penguins won’t march again” this year. Marching is a pretty good description, since marching implies a regimented, formalized, “everyone move out of the way” type of procession. I don’t think it’s any mistake that Google used that verb, because every time Penguin has updated (as infrequent as it’s been), it’s “marched all over” website owners. Whether they knew it was coming or not isn’t the issue, and whether they did anything to deserve it, even less so. The issue is that Google is taking a Third Reich type approach to search (Edit: This is meant to be a joke based on Godwin’s law and the early days of usenet, not to equate Google with Hitler). No longer the open opportunity equalizer that search used to be, increasingly small business owners find themselves pushed out, either because they don’t have the budgets to create buzz the way large companies do, or because they don’t have the money to hire good quality SEOs the way that large companies do.

    Most SEOs who know aren’t surprised that Google isn’t marching their penguins this year. We saw this coming. In fact, I’ll still be surprised if Penguin ever marches again. Google has already admitted that they will not be able to roll out Penguin in its old style; that it will have to be a real time algorithm that can update fluidly with the rest of the index. What most people don’t realize though, is that Google broke the internet.

    Read the whole thing for her thoughts on how Google broke links. Here’s some of the reaction on Twitter (including from Google’s Illyes who interrupted his own vacation to chime in.

    It might ultimately be a good thing that Google has delayed the update at this point, but those anxiously awaiting a chance for recovery probably aren’t too happy about it.

    Either way, the next Penguin is supposed to be “huge” in that it will be a shift to real-time updating, meaning webmasters and SEOs will no longer have to wait forever to recover when impacted.

    Do you want Google to launch the update before the new year? Do you care one way or another? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Google Lists Google My Business Listing Visibility Factors

    Google Lists Google My Business Listing Visibility Factors

    Update: Google has changed language to remove “clicks”. Very interesting.

    Your business listings on Google aren’t going to do much for you if people don’t see them. Just having one isn’t enough. You need to make sure it’s optimized.

    Google employee Rahul J posted on the company’s Advertiser Community site about how to optimize your listing. He gets into fundamentals like selecting the right category, sharing your location and page with customers, asking customers to share their experiences, sharing updates, and including photos.

    Before that, however, he lists four factors that the visibility of your listing depends on. These are: relevance, prominence, distance, and search history.

    For relevance, he says, you should ask yow relevant your category and listing are to the search phrase used by the user. For prominence, he means traffic to your business listing and how established the business is online.

    Distance, of course, refers to the actual physical location in relation to that of the user.

    Search history refers to how many times the listing has been clicked on by users searching with the keyword.

    Regarding that factor, Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable notes, “I believe this is common knowledge in the local SEO world but I don’t think I’ve seen Google come out and say it.”

    Rahul J writes that the four factors are “governed by a dynamic system that decides the search results” and that “no one at Google has any influence over it.”

    Good to know.

  • The Next Big Phase of Google Search Is Coming Early Next Year

    The Next Big Phase of Google Search Is Coming Early Next Year

    Last month, Google announced Accelerated Mobile Pages, a new open source project, which is basically its answer to Facebook’s Instant Articles. Like Instant Articles, the purpose of the project is to enable web pages to load more quickly on mobile devices.

    Google announced on Tuesday that it will begin sending traffic to AMP pages in Google search beginning early next year. They didn’t give a specific date, but said they intend to share “more concrete specifics on timing very soon.” Stay tuned for that. It remains to be seen whether or not these pages will get a ranking boost by default, but given Google’s emphasis on the mobile experience, it seems very likely that AMPs will benefit.

    Are you planning to implement Accelerated Mobile Pages? Let us know in the comments.

    “We want webpages with rich content like video, animations and graphics to work alongside smart ads, and to load instantaneously,” Google explained when the project was announced. “We also want the same code to work across multiple platforms and devices so that content can appear everywhere in an instant—no matter what type of phone, tablet or mobile device you’re using.”

    The program utilizes a new open framework called AMP HTML, which is built on existing web technologies, and is aimed at letting websites build light-weight pages.

    As far as ranking goes, Danny Sullivan said in a tweet last month that AMP pages won’t rank better because they’re AMP, but noted that Google already rewards speedy pages, so they can still benefit.

    Google has already made mobile-friendliness a ranking signal, and the whole point of AMPs is to make for a better mobile experience. It’s hard to imagine a scenario in which AMPs aren’t benefiting in rankings.

    “Thousands of publishers have expressed interest in AMP since the preview launched with the likes of the BBC, Sankei, New York Times, News Corp, Washington Post and more,” write David Besbris (Vice President of Engineering, Google Search) and Richard Gingras (Head of News, Google) in a blog post. “Since then, many others have committed their support to the project, including R7.com and NZN Group in Brazil; CBS Interactive, AOL, Thrillist, Slate, International Business Times/Newsweek, Al Jazeera America and The Next Web in the US; El Universal and Milenio in Mexico; The Globe and Mail and Postmedia in Canada, as well as many more across the globe. The Local Media Consortium (LMC), a partnership of 70+ media companies collectively representing 1,600 local newspapers and television stations, has also voiced their support.”

    The two also announced that Outbrain, AOL, OpenX, DoubleCLick, and AdSense are working within the project’s framework to improve the ad experience for users, publishers, and advertisers. More information on this will come in the near future, they say.

    “Ensuring that traffic to AMP articles is counted just like current web articles is also a major focus of the project,” they write. “comScore, Adobe Analytics, Parse.ly and Chartbeat have all stated that they intend to provide analytics for AMP pages within their tools. They have since been joined by many others: Nielsen, ClickTale and Google Analytics. This development is significant for the AMP Project because publishers developing for AMP will not skip a beat in terms of analytics and measurement — analytics for AMP are real time and will work within your existing provider.”

    According to Google, there are over 4,500 developers expressing interest in AMP with over 250 contributions of new code, samples, and documentation having been made. Discussions are also underway related to analytics and template features.

    With Google Search the mobile experience has been they key narrative throughout 2015, and it looks like that will continue throughout next year, largely driven by AMP.

    Has this development been on your radar thus far? What do you think of the project? Discuss.

    Image via Google/AMPProject.org

  • Google Confirms Next Penguin Will Be ‘Huge’

    Google Confirms Next Penguin Will Be ‘Huge’

    As far as we know, webmasters can expect Google’s Penguin update to make a return before the year is over. It’s possible that this won’t be the case, but based on previous comments from Googlers, it should be.

    Are you anxiously anticipating Google’s next Penguin launch? Let us know in the comments.

    The SEO and webmaster communities have been waiting for Google to launch a new Penguin refresh for a long time. Google has been promising a new version that will update in real time, so those impacted by it won’t have to wait for Google to push another one to have any hope of recovery. It will instead be constantly updating.

    A couple months ago, Google’s John Mueller said he expected Penguin to be here before the end of the year. Google’s Gary Illyes said it was in the “foreseeable future” and that he “hoped” it would be here before the end of the year.

    Late last month, Illyes talked about it a little on Twitter with curious parties, tweeting that the update was still not ready for primetime.

    He did, however, indicate it was still on track for this year:

    Illyes also indicated at the time that it was not too late for Penguin to acknowledge disavow files.

    This week, Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points to further comments from Illyes on Twitter confirming that the next Penguin will indeed update in real time, and will be an actual update to the algorithm as opposed to a data refresh. He calls it a “huge change”.

    Assuming that the update does come before the end of the year, that gives us roughly five weeks, so it should be very soon, but it’s not a given.

    It is worth noting (as he does) that Illyes does not actually work on Penguin, even if he’s the one giving the webmaster community the most information about it.

    The update will be quite welcome to webmasters waiting for a chance to recover from previous iterations of Penguin, but even more significantly, those impacted by the algorithm in the future won’t have to wait so long to see the fruits of any potential recovery efforts. At least in theory.

    Are you looking forward to the Penguin launch? Discuss.

  • Google is Eyeing Mobile Affiliate Networks

    Google is Eyeing Mobile Affiliate Networks

    This year Google has been making a tremendous amount of moves to improve the mobile user experience. They’ve added features and new ranking signals, and cracked down on certain practices.

    As an extension of that last element, Google has been talking about going after mobile affiliate networks that hurt the user experience.

    Google’s Andrey Lipattsev talked a little about this in a Google hangout, as Search Engine Land reports:

    Andrey Lipattsev said this issue “is very close to my heart right now.” His team is working with him to detect these “mobile affiliate traffic driving networks” that “users are just being bounced from one place to another.” He said sometimes publishers add these networks to their site on purpose to make extra money but sometimes the publishers and even the advertisers are unaware of it.

    Last month, Google warned webmasters that it will take action on sites caught engaging in “sneaky mobile redirects,” referring to URLs that load one thing from the desktop, but redirect users to different content from mobile search results.

    Image via Google

  • Google Updates Search Quality Rater Guidelines

    Google Updates Search Quality Rater Guidelines

    Google announced that it has updated its guidelines for search quality raters. The reason behind this (much like the reason for many of the company’s announcements) is the increasing use of mobile devices.

    The company says it recently completed a “major” revision of the guidelines with mobile in mind.

    “Developing algorithmic changes to search involves a process of experimentation,” says Google search growth and analysis senior product manager Mimi Underwood. “Part of that experimentation is having evaluators—people who assess the quality of Google’s search results—give us feedback on our experiments. Ratings from evaluators do not determine individual site rankings, but are used help us understand our experiments. The evaluators base their ratings on guidelines we give them; the guidelines reflect what Google thinks search users want.”

    “In 2013, we published our human rating guidelines to provide transparency on how Google works and to help webmasters understand what Google looks for in web pages,” Underwood adds. “Since that time, a lot has changed: notably, more people have smartphones than ever before and more searches are done on mobile devices today than on computers. We often make changes to the guidelines as our understanding of what users wants evolves, but we haven’t shared an update publicly since then.”

    You can see the update here.

    Google says it won’t update the public document with every little change, but will try to do so for the big ones.

    Image via Google

  • Facebook Lets Google Index Mobile App

    Facebook Lets Google Index Mobile App

    Google is now reportedly indexing Facebook’s mobile app as part of its app indexing efforts.

    Google has been encouraging app developers to utilize its app indexing resources to enable mobile users to get to content within apps from Google search results. Google has even made app indexing a ranking signal.

    Apparently Facebook wasn’t getting involved until now. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Facebook is now allowing Google to crawl in-app content. Of course the content is the same stuff Google was already accessing on the web version, such as public profile information. From the report:

    The agreement means that results from Google searches on smartphones will display some content from Facebook’s app, including public profile information. The listings will appear as “deep links” that will take users to the relevant part of the Facebook app, the spokeswoman said.

    Google can’t show content shared through logged-in and private Facebook app sessions, meaning it is still locked out of most information inside the walled garden of Facebook’s social network. For those searches, users will have to use Facebook’s search service, which it recently updated.

    Facebook has been going to great lengths to improve its own search service. The company recently announced some major improvements to search across personal connections and public posts, and is now testing in-profile search.

    It’s unclear from the Journal’s report whether Google is indexing Facebook’s app on just Android, just iOS, or both. The ability to index Android apps has been around for a longer time, but Google recently expanded its efforts to include iOS.

    For more on app indexing, view our related coverage here.

    Image via Google Play

  • Bing Announces Its Own Mobile-Friendly Tool

    Bing Announces Its Own Mobile-Friendly Tool

    As you’re probably aware, Google made mobile-friendliness a ranking signal earlier this year. Since (and even before) doing so, the company has provided webmasters with a tool that lets them check their pages to ensure that they are indeed mobile-friendly. This is something that’s probably largely taken for granted as Google doesn’t give you tools that let you know if you pass the test for all of its signals.

    Bing has also indicated it will take mobile-friendliness into account when ranking web pages, and today announced the launch of its own mobile-friendliness tool.

    “The Mobile Friendliness Test tool runs checks on all of these key factors and additionally checks for and reports on resources that are needed to analyze the page fully but that we weren’t able to crawl due to robots.txt constraints,” Bing says. “This way rendering issues (as seen in the page preview) can be fixed by webmasters by updating robots.txt in such a way that Bing can accurately determine the mobile-friendliness of the sites.”

    “When you submit the URL of a page to be analyzed to the Mobile Friendliness Test tool, our Bing Mobile crawler fetches and renders the page, extracting important features that are used by the tool to determine how the page performs against each of the above factors,” it adds. “The outcomes are then aggregated into a consolidated mobile-friendliness verdict for the page.”

    Bing lists the following as factors it considers with regard to mobile-friendliness: viewport and zoom control configuration; width of page content; readability of text on the page; spacing of links and other elements on page; use of incompatible plug-ins. You can get more details about each of these here.

    Image via Bing

  • Overstock Hurt By Google Search Changes Again

    Overstock Hurt By Google Search Changes Again

    Overstock.com has had a lot of financial trouble over the years as a direct result of how its content shows up in Google search results. It is perhaps one of the best examples of how drastically a reliance on Google traffic can hurt a business when things go wrong.

    Overstock released its financials for Q3 this week, with earnings down a reported 11% thanks in part to algorithmic changes at Google. This wasn’t the only problem the company pointed to, but it was a significant one.

    In the actual earnings report, Overstock said, “We are experiencing some slowing of our overall revenue growth which we believe is due in part to changes that Google made in its natural search engine algorithms, to which we are responding. While we work to adapt to Google’s changes, we are increasing our emphasis on other marketing channels, such as sponsored search and display ad marketing, which are generating revenue growth but with higher associated marketing expenses than natural search.”

    CEO Dr. Patrick Byrne told investors on a conference call, “Third of the problem was the Google search change, as it affects everybody. It affected — it was a little bit different this year than it was in previous years in some respects in who it helped and who it hurt. But we think we’ve already learned our way out of that.”

    These comments did not thing to help the company’s stock price, which immediately tanked by 17%.

    Overstock was famously penalized by Google for its search tactics in 2011. The company had been encouraging websites and colleges to post links to Overstock pages so students could get discounts. Before the penalty hit, the program had already been stopped, but thanks to a slow removal of links from some participating sites, Google caught wind of it and dealt a major blow to the company, leading to an ugly financial year for Overstock. They went from having top position search results to page five and six results.

    That debacle happened because of what Overstock did. These were unnatural links, and the company learned the hard way that Google won’t stand for them. This time, they just got hit by the algorithm as so many often do.

    Image via Overstock

  • Google My Business Gets Special Hours Feature

    Google My Business Gets Special Hours Feature

    Google My Business is getting a new feature that lets you pre-schedule specific hours for holidays or special events. Now that we’re into November, the feature couldn’t have come any sooner.

    When a business provides special hours to Google My Business for a known holiday in their region, Google will tell customers they’re seeing holiday-specific opening hours. If you don’t provide special hours for a known holiday in your region (even if you update your regular hours), Google will add a disclaimer to let customers know that “hours might differ” for the holiday.

    “The holiday season is fast approaching and with it customers looking for last minute gifts,” says Google’s Marissa Nordahl in the Google and Your Business Help Forum (via Rise Insight).”They are wondering when they can visit your business and counting on your business information being correct on Google.”

    “Special Hours are not just for the holidays,” she says. “With Special Hours in Google My Business, merchants can pre-schedule exceptional hours up to 365 days in advance. This feature is particularly useful for special events where normal business hours do not apply. Simply use Google My Business to tell us the date with special hours, and we’ll display those instead of the regular business hours for that date. No need to return and reupload your hours, we’ll display your regular hours automatically after the date you specified for your special event.”

    There’s a Google Help Center article about setting up special hours here. You can only use the feature if you’ve provided regular hours of course.

    Images via Google

  • Google Mobile-Friendly Algorithm Gets Update

    Google Mobile-Friendly Algorithm Gets Update

    Google had been hinting for months that app-install interstitials would become a negative ranking signal in search results, and about two months ago, they made it official.

    Google announced that it was updating the Mobile-Friendly algorithm and test, advising sites against showing app install interstitials “that hide a significant amount of content on the transition from the search result page”.

    As you probably know, Google introduced the mobile-friendly ranking signal earlier this year. It provided sites with a helpful mobile-friendly test tool so that they can make sure their pages were up to snuff. If a page passed the test, it would be good as far as that particular signal is concerned. The interstitials element adds a new factor to mobile-friendliness that will cause some that previously passed the test to now fail.

    Google announced this week that the new addition is now officially live in the algorithm.

    Google’s latest announcement was made at 2:24 (Eastern) on Monday. Have you seen any changes yet? Let us know in the comments.

    In a post on Google+, the company says:

    Starting today, pages with an app install interstitial that hide a significant amount of content on the transition from the search result page won’t be considered mobile-friendly.

    Instead of full page interstitials, we recommend that webmasters use more user-friendly formats such as app install banners. We hope that this change will make it easier for searchers to see the content of the pages they are looking for.

    For a little more background, Google had this to say about it in September:

    After November 1, mobile web pages that show an app install interstitial that hides a significant amount of content on the transition from the search result page will no longer be considered mobile-friendly. This does not affect other types of interstitials. As an alternative to app install interstitials, browsers provide ways to promote an app that are more user-friendly.>

    App install banners are supported by Safari (as Smart Banners) and Chrome (as Native App Install Banners). Banners provide a consistent user interface for promoting an app and provide the user with the ability to control their browsing experience. Webmasters can also use their own implementations of app install banners as long as they don’t block searchers from viewing the page’s content.

    Ahead of the announcement, Google shared results of some internal testing it did with its Google+ app showing that an app install interstitial negatively impacted the user experience. Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman was very vocal about his opposition to Google’s position on the matter.

    After Google shared its study results, Stoppelman said on Twitter, “Google says stop pushing App downloads yet its own team push apps using same ‘bad’ designs. Is this about protecting consumers or protecting their search monopoly?”

    He later wrote a guest post for Search Engine Land asking the same question. In that, he said, “While many users find apps by browsing inside an app store, another critical way they discover new apps is through mobile search engines, like Google. In this way, mobile search indeed serves a critical function to users: offering a bridge from the less desirable world of mobile Web browsing to a new world inside apps.”

    He went on to discuss how apps threaten Google’s search business. After that, LinkedIn publicly questioned Google’s findings as well. They started off by saying that nobody wants Google+ for one thing.

    “Naturally, an interstitial that interrupts the user experience to promote something that most people don’t want is bound to backfire,” wrote Omar Restom, mobile product manager at LinkedIn. “Google shouldn’t extrapolate based on this one case. ”

    “Google admits that it was showing their interstitial even to users who already have the app – that’s bad mojo and fundamentally bad audience targeting,” he added. “Again, Google should only have shown this promo to people who actually want and need the app. The Google+ Team also violated Google’s own SEO policy by showing this interstitial on SEO Pages.”

    He went on to make the case that LinkedIn’s interstitials work better because of better targeting and better creatives. Restom also backed up his argument with some numbers, comparing clickthrough rate, bounce rate and incremental app downloads driven between Google+ and LinkedIn.

    Do you agree with Yelp and LinkedIn about Google’s findings? Do you think Google is doing the right thing with this ranking signal? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Images via Google

  • Google Gives Webmasters A New Warning

    Google Gives Webmasters A New Warning

    Google is warning webmasters that they will take action if they catch a site engaging in “sneak mobile redirects”. This refers to a URL that loads one thing from the desktop, but redirects users to different content from mobile search results.

    Do you see this often while using Google Search? Do you think it’s a major problem? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    That’s the nutshell version, but as with most of these things, it’s not always that simple. Thankfully, Google is aware of that.

    For one, there are legitimate reasons to show mobile users different content than desktop users, though typically this will come in the form of an altered, mobile-optimized version of the same content. Google is fine with that and claims it understands such modifications “very well”.

    There are also times when sneak mobile redirects are actually happening without the webmaster’s knowledge or explicit consent. This can come from what Google refers to as advertising schemes that redirect mobile suers specifically as well as from a site being a target of hacking. In these cases, sites still face action from Google, but as long as they’re set up with Search Console, webmasters should be able to stay on top of any such issues that arise.

    “It’s a violation of the Google Webmaster Guidelines to redirect a user to a page with the intent of displaying content other than what was made available to the search engine crawler (more information on sneaky redirects),” Google’s Vincent Courson and Badr Salmi El Idrissi write in a blog post. “To ensure quality search results for our users, the Google Search Quality team can take action on such sites, including removal of URLs from our index. When we take manual action, we send a message to the site owner via Search Console. Therefore, make sure you’ve set up a Search Console account.”

    “Be sure to choose advertisers who are transparent on how they handle user traffic, to avoid unknowingly redirecting your own users,” they add. “If you are interested in trust-building in the online advertising space, you may check out industry-wide best practices when participating in ad networks. For example, the Trustworthy Accountability Group’s (Interactive Advertising Bureau) Inventory Quality Guidelines are a good place to start. There are many ways to monetize your content with mobile solutions that provide a high quality user experience, be sure to use them.”

    To detect if your site is doing any sneaky mobile redirects, Google says to check if you are redirected when you navigate your site on your smartphone, listen to users, and monitor users in your analytics data. You can look at the average time on site by mobile users. As Google notes, if you notice that a significant drop in this metric from mobile users only, you might have a problem.

    “To be aware of wide changes in mobile user activity as soon as they happen, you can for example set up Google Analytics alerts,” the Googlers write. “For example, you can set an alert to be warned in case of a sharp drop in average time spent on your site by mobile users, or a drop in mobile users (always take into account that big changes in those metrics are not a clear, direct signal that your site is doing mobile sneaky redirects).”

    If you’ve already detected sneaky redirects on your site, Google advises you to make sure your site isn’t hacked and conduct an audit of third-party scripts/elements on your site.

    You can look at Google’s Security Issues tool in Search Console. Google will give you information there if it has found your site to be hacked. The company also suggests looking at its resources on typical symptoms of hacked sites and its case studies on the subject.

    In terms of conducting an audit of third-party scripts/elements, they suggest the following three steps: remove the ones you don’t control one by one from the redirecting pages; check your site on a mobile device or through emulation between each removal and see when the redirect stops; if you find one that you think is responsible for the sneaky redirect, remove it from your site and “debug” the issue with the provider.

    More information about how to go about doing these things is available here.

    Have you ever found a third-party to responsible for unintentional “sneaky” redirects on your site? How did you solve the problem? Discuss.
    Image via Google

  • Google Penguin Update Still On For This Year

    Google Penguin Update Still On For This Year

    The SEO and webmaster communities have been waiting for Google to launch a new Penguin refresh for a long time. Google has been promising a new version that will update in real time, so those impacted by it won’t have to wait for Google to push another one to have any hope of recovery. It will instead be constantly updating.

    About a month ago, Google’s John Mueller said he expected Penguin to be here before the end of the year. Google’s Gary Illyes said it was in the “foreseeable future” and that he “hoped” it would be here before the end of the year.

    Illyes has since been talking about it a little on Twitter with curious parties. Last week, he tweeted (via Search Engine Roundtable) that it’s still not ready for primetime.

    It does look like the update is still on track for this year, however. Illeys tweeted that he still expects as much.

    Illyes also indicated on Twitter this week that it’s not too late for Penguin to acknowledge disavow files.

    As Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points out, however, if everything goes according to plan, it should never again be too late because the update will continue in real time once it finally comes.

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Google RankBrain: 10 Things We Know About It

    Google revealed in an interview with Bloomberg Business published on Monday that it has a new ranking signal called RankBrain and that it considers it to be the third most important out of hundreds.

    In a nutshell, RankBrain is a machine learning-based signal that helps Google better deal with queries it hasn’t seen before, which actually makes up a substantial amount of the queries the search engine sees day-to-day.

    If this interests you, you’ll definitely want to check out the interview. We also covered it here, but if you’re more interested in an at-a-glance takeaway, here’s a quick list of ten things we know about RankBrain based on what Greg Corrado, a senior research scientist at Google, told Bloomberg.

    10 Things we know about Google’s RankBrain signal

    1. RankBrain is the third most important ranking signal in Google Search.

    2. RankBrain was deployed several months ago.

    3. RankBrain uses artificial intelligence to put written language into mathematical entities (vectors) that computers can understand.

    4. If RankBrain sees a word/phrase it doesn’t know, the machine guesses what words/phrases might have similar meanings.

    5. RankBrain specifically helps with never-before-seen search queries.

    6. RankBrain is better than humans (even Googlers) at guessing which results Google would rank number one for various queries.

    7. RankBrain is the first Google search ranking signal that actually learns on its own.

    8. Turning RankBrain off is as damaging to users as turning off half of Wikipedia pages.

    9. RankBrain is so effective, Google engineers were surprised at how well it worked.

    10. Machine learning is a major focus of Google right now, which probably means we’ll see RankBrain itself and other endeavors in this area improve greatly in the future.

    Image via Google

  • RankBrain: Google’s 3rd Most Important Ranking Signal

    RankBrain: Google’s 3rd Most Important Ranking Signal

    RankBrain is reportedly the third most important signal Google’s search algorithms use when determining what content to show users in search results. Out of over 200 signals, this is one of the most powerful. And we’ve never heard of it until now.

    RankBrain was revealed in a Bloomberg Business interview with Greg Corrado, a senior research scientist at Google. It was introduced into Google’s search algorithm on a wide scale earlier this year, and according to the Corrado, it quickly became the third most important signal out of “hundreds”.

    Do you feel like Google’s search results have become significantly better this year? Have you noticed much difference? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    So what it is exactly? It’s apparently the first Google ranking signal that actually learns.

    For more of a quick “at-a-glance” look at what we know about RankBrain, go here.

    Corrado told Bloomberg, “The other signals, they’re all based on discoveries and insights that people in information retrieval have had, but there’s no learning.”

    According to the article, a “very large fraction” of Google queries are interpreted by the artificial intelligence system known as RankBrain. It also helps Google deal with “the 15 percent of queries a day it gets which its systems have never seen before,” such as “ambiguous queries, like ‘What’s the title of the consumer at the highest level of a food chain?’” the report explains.

    “RankBrain uses artificial intelligence to embed vast amounts of written language into mathematical entities — called vectors — that the computer can understand,” it says. “If RankBrain sees a word or phrase it isn’t familiar with, the machine can make a guess as to what words or phrases might have a similar meaning and filter the result accordingly, making it more effective at handling never-before-seen search queries.”

    According to the report, RankBrain has performed better than Corrado and company have expected, and has had a ten percent better success rate than humans at Google asked to guess which results Google would rank number one for various queries. Corrado even indicated that based on experiments Google has run, turning RankBrain off is as damaging to users as turning off half of Wikipedia pages.

    RankBrain is only one of many ways Google is increasingly turning to machine learning to improve its products. Google CEO Sundar Pichai discussed the company’s efforts several times throughout Alphabet’s Q3 earnings conference call last week.

    In prepared remarks (via a transcript of the call from SeekingAlpha), he told listeners, “Our investments in machine learning and artificial intelligence are a priority for us. Machine learning has long powered things like voice search, translation, and much more. And our machine learning is hard at work in mobile services like Now on Tap, which quickly assist you by providing additional useful information for whatever you’re doing, right in the moment, anywhere on your phone. If you’re an Android user that runs Marshmallow, try it out by long pressing the home button, when you’re in the Map, it’s very cool.”

    “Another example is the Google photos app, which leverages powerful machine learning technology to help people discover, organize and share their photos,” he added. ” It’s a great product that people love. In fact, in just a few months since we launched it at Google I/O, photos is now used by over a 100 million users who have collectively uploaded more than 50 billion photos and videos.”

    During the Q&A portion of the call, Pichai said, “On mobile search – to me – increasingly we see – we already announced that or 50% of our searchers are on mobile. Mobile gives us very unique opportunities in terms of better understanding users and over time as we use things like machine learning, I think we can make great strides. So my long-term view on this is, it is ask compelling or in fact even better than the desktop, but it will take us time to get there, and we’re going to be focused to be get that.”

    In response to a later question, he said, “Machine learning is core transformative way by which we are rethinking everything we are doing. We’ve been investing in this area for a while. We believe we are state-of-the-art here. And the progress particularly in the last two years has been pretty dramatic. And so we are – we are thoughtfully applying it across all our products, be it search, be it ads, be it YouTube and Play et cetera. And we are in early days, but you will see us in a systematic manner, think about how we can apply machine learning to all these areas.”

    Clearly machine learning is going to permeate more and more of the overall Google experience as time goes on, and with RankBrain having become such an important factor to search in such a short amount of time, we’d have to expect Google’s search experience to continue to improve rapidly.

    RankBrain has reportedly been deployed for a “few months”.

    So as a webmaster/site owner, is there anyway you can take advantage of this third most important ranking signal? Unfortunately, there’s probably not a lot you can do to directly influence how RankBrain views your content. That said, the signal could very well help Google better point people to your content as it better understands what users are looking for, particularly when it comes to long tail searches, which still account for a substantial number of queries Google sees on a regular basis.

    As for which signals are more important to Google than RankBrain, Google won’t come out and say, but experts in the field like Danny Sullivan think they’re most likely links (the signal that put Google on the map in the first place) and words (as in the words users enter in searches and the words on website’s page).

    Do you expect RankBrain to have an effect on SEO strategy? Share your thoughts in the comments.

  • Google Rich Answers Increasing, Can You Take Advantage?

    Google Rich Answers Increasing, Can You Take Advantage?

    Earlier this year, Stone Temple Consulting released a study looking at Google’s rich answers in search. These are the results that appear on search results pages giving the user a direct answer on the page, reducing the likelihood that they’ll need to click through to a third-party site.

    Do you think rich answers are making Google better? Let us know in the comments.

    The results often appear at the top of the page, but not always. The study highlights several types of rich answers, including the “knowledge boxes,” carousel results, and rich snippet results.

    The firm has now updated the research after finding significant growth in how often Google displays these.

    This type of search result has long made some webmasters uneasy because the more Google displays these, the less people will have to find what they’re looking for on other websites, which one would assume means less referrals. Google, of course, takes the position that it puts the users above websites, so this isn’t really something the company appears to be all that concerned about. Google’s job is to give users what they’re looking for as quickly as possible, and this is one way it can do that.

    Google has been criticized for “scraping” this content from websites for years, but it’s clear that the practice is showing now signs of slowing down.

    The initial study looked at over 855,000 queries to see how many returned a rich answer box. Based on the new findings, the growth in this type of results has been about 9% since February.

    “From an apples to apples perspective, the numbers grew from 22% in February to 31% now, so the growth was substantial,” a spokesperson for Stone Temple tells WebProNews.

    They look at growth in various types of rich answers including simple ones (with no titles or pictures), those with titles, and those with no attribution whatsoever. It’s that third group that saw the largest growth (32.5%) and could make webmasters the most uneasy.

    The study points to this as growth in Google’s own raw knowledge, which includes things like public domain information and data licensed by Google, such as song lyrics, which is actually an area where third-party sites have suffered.

    The study also examines results with sliders, tabs, tables, charts, images, and forms. All of these types saw growth. Results with maps and results with list ellipses actually declined.

    The study includes some interesting case studies on specific sites whose information was used in rich answers. It also gets into tests performed by Stone Temple, which led to them getting their site included in these results.

    “A lot of the times when you see these rich answer results in the SERPs, you see very high authority sites like Wikipedia,” says Stone Temple’s Eric Enge in the study. “That leads many to believe that the Google algo for generating rich answers is based on authority. However, we took a close look at the authority of all the domains used in the rich answers in our data set.”

    “Not only are 54% of the domains used Moz Domain Authority (‘DA’) of 60 or less, you can actually see some sites with a DA less than 20 used by Google,” he adds. “So low DA is not a deal killer for having your site used by Google to generate a rich answer. Note, when Google extracts a rich answer from a third party web site, they refer to this as a ‘featured snippet.’”

    Despite the fact that these answers may drive down referrals to third-party sites, it’s still most likely going to benefit you to be there for visibility’s sake. They do include links and it’s obviously going to be better to be featured in this manner than appearing down among the rest of the results that probably aren’t even being looked at in most cases.

    In fact, case studies presented in Stone Temple’s report point to increased traffic from rich answer appearances. Still, you have to wonder if the top result would get just as much traffic or more if there were no rich answer at all.

    As mentioned, Stone Temple managed to successfully appear in some rich answers as a result of some testing. Based on this, they advise sites to follow four steps: Identify a simple question; Provide a direct answer; Offer value added info; Make it easy for users (and Google to find).

    They actually did this by creating videos that answered specific questions (but also covered “quite a bit more”), published them with full transcripts, made sure clear responses (for users and for Google) to the questions were provided, and shared links to the pages on Google+ and submitted them to Search Console. Two out of five of the pages they tried showed in just three days.

    So it can be done. Take a look at the study for much more detail on all these findings.

    Do you have content that appears in Google’s rich answers? Do you see these results as a threat or as helpful? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Image via Stone Temple Consulting