WebProNews

Tag: SEO

  • Google Will Announce The Long-Anticipated Penguin Update

    Google Will Announce The Long-Anticipated Penguin Update

    Well, here we are halfway through April, and still no sign of that long-anticipated Penguin update. Google has been hinting at rolling this thing out for many months. At one point it was supposed to happen before the end of last year, but it kept getting pushed back. Google just hasn’t been ready to launch it yet.

    Early last month, Google’s Gary Illyes, who had been hinting at date possibilities for quite some time, said he would no longer give any timeframes as he kept being wrong.

    We still don’t have a timeframe, but at least we’ll know when the time finally does come. Google’s John Mueller said in a Google+ hangout (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    I am pretty sure when we start rolling out [Penguin] we will have a message to kind of post but at the moment I don’t have anything specific to kind of announce.

    Waiting on Google to push the new Penguin has grown increasingly frustrating for businesses impacted by the update in the past, who have lost search visibility and traffic and have no way to recover until the next one comes. Once the next one does come, it will supposedly be continuous, meaning that sites will no longer have to wait so long to recover in the future if they make the necessary adjustments.

    Read this interview Illyes did with Stone Temple a while back for more comments on the the pending update.

  • Google: Those Unnatural Link Penalties Are About The Product Reviews We Warned You About

    Google: Those Unnatural Link Penalties Are About The Product Reviews We Warned You About

    As previously reported, Google handed out a bunch of penalties over the weekend for unnatural outbound links. Now, the company has clarified that this is directly tied to product reviews that violate its guidelines.

    If you were affected by this, you can’t say you weren’t warned. Beyond this being pretty much common knowledge for years, Google posted a warning of sorts to its webmaster blog last month. In that, it laid out “best practices” for bloggers and companies when it comes to the latter giving the former free products, and the former reviewing them.

    It was this post Google’s John Mueller referenced in response to people complaining in the Google forums (via Search Engine Roundtable). In one thread, he said:

    In particular, if a post was made because of a free product (or free service, or just paid, etc), then any links placed there because of that need to have a rel=nofollow attached to them. This includes links to the product itself, any sales pages (such as on Amazon), affiliate links, social media profiles, etc. that are associated with that post. Additionally, I imagine your readers would also appreciate it if those posts were labeled appropriately. It’s fine to keep these kinds of posts up, sometimes there’s a lot of useful information in them! However, the links in those posts specifically need to be modified so that they don’t pass PageRank (by using the rel=nofollow).

    Once these links are cleaned up appropriately, feel free to submit a reconsideration request, so that the webspam team can double-check and remove the manual action.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable links you to several separate threads in which Mueller responds similarly, but you get the gist.

    Image via iStock

  • Google Penalizes Sites For Unnatural Links

    Google Penalizes Sites For Unnatural Links

    Google reportedly handed out a bunch of penalties over the weekend for unnatural outbound links. These are unnatural links going from your site to others.

    According to Search Engine Land, many of these were issued over the weekend, but it’s unclear if there were many for unnatural inbound links (as in the sites being linked to by the links in question).

    While Google hasn’t issued a statement, a lot of webmasters have reportedly received the messages in Search Console.

    In the Google Search Console help center, Google displays this video discussing what it means by unnatural links from your site:

    The video is nearly three years old, so presumably not much has changed here in terms of how Google defines this penalty. On the same page, Google has this to say about it:

    If you see this message on the Manual Actions page, it means that Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative outbound links. Buying links or participating in link schemes in order to manipulate PageRank is a violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines.

    As a result, Google has applied a manual spam action to the affected portions of your site. Actions that affect your whole site are listed under Site-wide matches. Actions that affect only part of your site and/or some incoming links to your site are listed under Partial matches.

    Over at Search Engine Roundtable, there are six links to different threads in Google’s forums with people complaining about the penalty.

    Image via iStock

  • HTTPS Launched For All Custom Domains On WordPress.com

    HTTPS Launched For All Custom Domains On WordPress.com

    Automattic announced that they’re launching free HTTPS for all custom domains hosted on WordPress.com. WordPress.com has supported encryption for WordPress.com subdomains since 2014, but now it’s being expanded to over a million custom domains.

    The company says users will see secure encryption automatically deployed on every new site within minutes.

    “We are closing the door to un-encrypted web traffic (HTTP) at every opportunity,” writes Automattic’s Chief Systems Wrangler.

    As he notes, encryption provides more than security.

    “Protocol enhancements like SPDY and HTTP/2 have narrowed the performance gap between encrypted and un-encrypted web traffic, with encrypted HTTP/2 outperforming un-encrypted HTTP/1.1 in some cases,” he writes.

    Google announced HTTPS as a ranking signal in 2014. Back in December, the search engine started indexing HTTPS versions of URLs by default.

    Earlier this year, Moz found that HTTPS URLs made up 25% of page-one Google results across 10,000 queries.

  • Google Drops the Google+ From Business Reviews

    Google Drops the Google+ From Business Reviews

    Google is reportedly no longer requiring users to have Google+ accounts to leave reviews. Given that Google+’s popularity never really caught on, this could open up the door for local businesses to get a lot more reviews on Google for better or for worse.

    Google has of course been removing the Google+ integration it spent several years building into many of its products, and this is just the latest example. For the most part, users have not seemed to be incredibly thrilled with Google+ being thrust upon their various Google experiences. The YouTube comment integration was particularly unpopular, but Google got rid of that last summer.

    According to reports, all users need to leave reviews on businesses is a Google account. They’re still required to leave a first and last name.

    More Google users leaving more reviews? I can’t imagine that Yelp, a frequent critic of Google, is thrilled with this news.

    Local search guy Mike Blumenthal who reported on the change (via Search Engine Land) also notes that Google has fixed a bug that prevented reviews from being left on mobile browsers if the business had no previous reviews. This is another reason businesses might start seeing their review counts go up.

    In related news, late last week, Google updated its documentation that contains advice for improving your local ranking. More on that here.

  • Google Says More About Local Ranking In Updated Document

    Google Says More About Local Ranking In Updated Document

    Google has updated its documentation that contains advice for improving your local ranking on the search engine.

    This was spotted by local search watcher Mike Blumenthal. Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable has the old version saved here. According to him, the document has been tripled in size.

    There’s a section about “prominence” that has some new language in it, and that seems to be the most significant change. Here’s what the section says now:

    Prominence refers to how well-known a business is. Some places are more prominent in the offline world, and search results try to reflect this in local ranking. For example, famous museums, landmark hotels, or well-known store brands that are familiar to many people are also likely to be prominent in local search results.

    Prominence is also based on information that Google has about a business from across the web (like links, articles, and directories). Google review count and score are factored into local search ranking: more reviews and positive ratings will probably improve a business’s local ranking. Your position in web results is also a factor, so SEO best practices also apply to local search optimization.

    The key part to take note of here is the one about Google using links, articles, and directories from across the web for prominence.

  • Top Google Ranking Signals Officially Named

    Top Google Ranking Signals Officially Named

    A Googler revealed the 3 top Google ranking signals in a hangout.

    Webmasters and SEOs have been wondering what the top Google ranking signals are for many years. The entire secret sauce changes pretty much every day, of course, but Google would never reveal all of its more than 200 ranking signals beyond saying, well, it has over 200 of them.

    It was somewhat surprising then that last year, the company dropped the nugget in a seemingly random interview that it had a new signal, going so far as to say that it’s actually the third most important one already.

    That would be RankBrain, but many have probably wondered what the two above that in the pecking order are. It just so happens that Google revealed the other two of the top three this week.

    And the Top Google Ranking Signals are…

    The truth is it’s hardly a bombshell, and the top two are probably the ones most people would guess if they were asked, but it’s nice to see Google definitively spell them out. The 3 top Google ranking signals are content, links, and RankBrain.

    Barry Schwartz pulled this out of a WebPromo Expert chat in which Google Search Quality Senior Strategist Andrey Lipattsev spilled the beans: “I can tell you what they are. It is content and links pointing to your site.”

    Asked about if he means in that order, he responded that there is no order.

    The most important focuses for a successful search strategy…

    So the most important things you can do for search ranking are create great content, and have people naturally link to it. RankBrain doesn’t really afford you any power that we know of as it’s simply a machine learning signal that helps Google internally, including (reportedly) how to weight some other signals.

    For more on the impact of RankBrain, take a look at our coverage of a recent study from Stone Temple Consulting on the subject.

    Ultimately, there’s probably nothing here to change your approach. You knew this stuff was important. Just know going forward that it’s the MOST important.

    Image via YouTube

  • What They’re Saying About The Loss of Google Right-Side Ads

    What They’re Saying About The Loss of Google Right-Side Ads

    You’re probably aware that Google recently stopped showing the normal text AdWords ads on the right-side of search results pages on the desktop, which brings the design more in line with its mobile results.

    Google does continue to show Product Listing Ads (PLAs) and Knowledge Panel ads in this area, but otherwise, this part of the page is now ad-less.

    Google is showing more ads in line with search results. It has ads at the bottom of results, the 3 standard ads at the top, and in some cases a fourth ad above the organic results. This is for a “very small percentage of highly commercial relevant queries” according to Google.

    You might say that’s a lot of ads “above the fold” in relation to non-ad content (something Google has historically frowned upon when it comes to other websites).

    Regarding the fourth ad, the company was quoted as saying, “We’ve been testing this layout for a long time, so some people might see it on a very small number of commercial queries. We’ll continue to make tweaks, but this is designed for highly commercial queries where the layout is able to provide more relevant results for people searching and better performance for advertisers.”

    Early on, some marketers complained that they had historically seen better conversions on right-side ads, and some even claimed their conversion rates had already plummeted as Google begun the roll-out.

    The changes were confirmed about a month ago, and in the meantime there has been a lot of commentary, speculation, and analysis. As this is such an important change for marketers, and we haven’t really dove into it much so far, I thought it would be a good time to look at some of said commentary.

    Larry Kim wrote in an article on the WordStream blog shortly after the confirmation of the change, “I’m confident the new fourth ad spot, plus new bottom spots, will make up for the loss of clicks on side ads. Another reason to be hopeful: The new fourth ad looks more like an organic result than an ad. That’s a huge plus for ads, since some users are more biased toward organic results. The fourth top ad spot also gives you the ability to use ad extensions, which gives you more room to highlight more information about your business (contact information, product images, links), which can increase your click-through rates.”

    “Without a doubt, this change is bad news for anyone involved in SEO,” he said later in his article. “Paid position #4 was the old organic position #1. The top organic search result will no longer be visible above the fold on many desktop devices. But, again, this isn’t shocking news because organic has been losing ground to new ad formats and other SERP changes every year.”

    Zak Stambor, managing editor at InternetRetailer shared some thoughts from a researcher at Adlucent:

    “The move will put more pressure on retailers to increase their bids for their most important keywords to ensure t consumers see their paid search ads, says Holly Pauzer, client insights and research manager at marketing firm Adlucent.”

    “‘Brands should expect competition for the top three spots on the results page to increase and CPCs [cost-per-click prices] to follow,’ she says. ‘Advertisers will need to be more granular in their build-out to be eligible for more auctions and should turn to tools like Google’s Customer Match to target the right consumers and retain efficiency.’”

    Bradley Hearn at ChannelAdisor suggested Google’s move automatically makes it more important to use PLAs:

    “PLAs will continue to grow in popularity, and more retailers and brands will continue to slug it out for those top spots. We’ve already seen that Google is experimenting with an expanded PLA layout that could bring the number of PLAs on the SERP to 16. Any way you look at it, PLAs are a big part of most retailers’ future.”

    Rachit Dayal from Happy Marketer thinks the change gives Google room to “innovate in ad offerings” on the right side.

    “I can see new, more focused ad units for particular industries such as hospitality, aviation, and financial services.”

    The change was apparently made to feature a more consistent ad experience between Google’s desktop and mobile results, but they do still include certain types of ads on the right-side, so this is entirely possible.

    Bilal Kamran at Bidness Etc. writes that the less competitive advertisers had it easier when there were eleven ad spots available, but that they’ll now face an uphill battle to occupy the available spots out of the current seven.

    “It is likely that most advertisers — barring the top ones — will face intense competition for remaining ad spots, which may drive their costs higher to remain visible on SERP,” Kamran adds.

    “While the reduction of ads on the Google search results pages may seem like it’s making fewer clicks available, I believe this change will significantly increase the number of clicks available,” opined Frederick Vallaeys, co-founder of AdWords tool company Optimyzr. “Now it’s up to advertisers to duke it out for who gets their piece of the bigger pie. With some straightforward changes in account management strategies related to bid management and Quality Score optimization, advertisers should find themselves well positioned to benefit from this change.”

    SEL recently ran a post from Googler Matt Lawson, who said that the data show that the change is neutral for small advertisers and that it “isn’t disrupting auction behavior.”

    He noted that some have expressed concern that the change will impact small advertisers for the worse with fewer ad spots meaning that smaller businesses will be “priced out of what’s left.”

    “We worried about exactly the same thing, which is why we tested this change so extensively before rolling it out,” he wrote. “The good news is, since the launch of the new layout, small advertisers as a whole haven’t seen much of a change in clicks.”

    “Regardless of how these changes impact advertisers broadly, what’s important is that you understand how to manage campaigns specifically for your accounts,” he said. “Luckily, it’s pretty straightforward, and you’re probably doing most, if not all, of the right things already.”

    While you can read the piece for elaboration, what this basically boils down to is monitoring your reporting, as well as your bids and budgets, enabling all extensions that that make sense for you, writing great ads, and refining your targeting.

    So that’s Google’s advice.

    In a newer article, Kim is back providing more Wordstream data, finding that very little has actually changed and that the “sky hasn’t fallen.” He does warn marketers to avoid “ridiculously uninformed speculation”.

  • RankBrain Tweaks Weights of Google Ranking Signals On Its Own?

    RankBrain Tweaks Weights of Google Ranking Signals On Its Own?

    Google revealed RankBrain to be its third most important ranking factor last year, but there appears to be a good deal of confusion within the company about just how it works.

    What are your thoughts about RankBrain? Do you see it as a good thing for Google? Share your thoughts.

    RankBrain was revealed in October pretty much out of nowhere. It didn’t come in an official announcement, but from an interview Bloomberg Business ran with Greg Corrado, a senior research scientist at Google. He said that Google had introduced the algorithm on a wide scale earlier in the year and that it quickly became the third most important signal out of hundreds in Google’s ranking algorithm.

    RankBrain uses artificial intelligence to put written language into mathematical entities (vectors) that computers can understand. If it sees a word or phrase that it doesn’t know, the machine guesses what words or phrases might have similar meanings. It helps specifically with never-before-seen search queries. Apparently it’s better at humans (even Googlers) at guessing which results Google would rank number one for various queries. It’s the first ranking signal that actually learns on its own. Google has indicated in the past that turning RankBrain off would be as damaging to search results as turning off half of Wikipedia pages.

    Barry Schwartz reported on a session at SMX West earlier this month in which Google’s Paul Haahr, who is described as “a top engineer involved in core ranking,” admitted that Google itself doesn’t fully understand RankBrain.

    Now, Schwartz is pointing to a Twitter conversation with Google’s Gary Illyes and Moz’s Rand Fishkin in which it’s suggested that RankBrain can’t use a new factor that wasn’t previously in an algorithm, but it might adjust the weights of existing signals. Still, Illyes notes that while he’s on the search quality team, he doesn’t know everything about RankBrain.

    Last week, Stone Temple Consulting released some research on RankBrain’s effectiveness at improving Google search results. The data was gathered by comparing 500,000 search queries from both before and after RankBrain was implemented.

    They found that Google improved results on 54.6% of queries that it previously misunderstood. Examples of words and phrases RankBrain handles better, according to the firm, include: what is, who is, where is, without, not, and convert.

    Stone Temple’s Eric Enge suggested that Google may use RankBrain to impact selection of featured snippet results, trigger the delivery of a map where there wasn’t one shown before, and/or determine if the main impact of a given query would be an improved search results snippet.

    “Predictably, one of the most common questions I get asked is how RankBrain will impact SEO,” he said. “Truth be told, at the moment, there is not much impact at all. RankBrain will simply do a better job of matching user queries with your web pages, so you’d arguably be less dependent on having all the words from the user query on your page.”

    “In addition, you still need to do keyword research so that you can understand how to target a page to a major topic area (and what that major topic area is),” he added. “Understanding the preferred language of most users will always make sense, whether or not search engines exist. If you haven’t already (hopefully you have!), you can increase your emphasis on using truly natural language on your web pages.”

    According to Enge, the real impacts of RankBrain are an increase in overall search quality and in Google’s confidence that they can use machine-leaning within the core search algorithm.

    Be sure to check out Stone Temple’s study if you haven’t already. It includes a nice infographic outlining the highlights.

    Do you think RankBrain is a positive thing for search results? Discuss.

  • This Google Ranking Signal Is About to Get A Boost

    This Google Ranking Signal Is About to Get A Boost

    Google made mobile-friendliness a ranking signal about a year ago, and the company just announced that it’s about to have even more significance. Long story short, if you haven’t gone mobile-friendly yet, you should do that ASAP.

    Have you ensured that your site is mobile-friendly by Google’s standards? Have you checked it lately? Discuss.

    Google had this to say in a brief post on its Webmaster Central blog:

    Getting good, relevant answers when you search shouldn’t depend on what device you’re using. You should get the best answer possible, whether you’re on a phone, desktop or tablet. Last year, we started using mobile-friendliness as a ranking signal on mobile searches. Today we’re announcing that beginning in May, we’ll start rolling out an update to mobile search results that increases the effect of the ranking signal to help our users find even more pages that are relevant and mobile-friendly.

    If you’ve already made your site mobile-friendly, you will not be impacted by this update. If you need support with your mobile-friendly site, we recommend checking out the Mobile-Friendly Test and the Webmaster Mobile Guide, both of which provide guidance on how to improve your mobile site. And remember, the intent of the search query is still a very strong signal — so even if a page with high quality content is not mobile-friendly, it could still rank well if it has great, relevant content.

    Keep in mind, that even if you made your site mobile-friendly to prepare for this initial update last spring, there has been at least once significant change since then.

    In the fall, Google announced a new caveat to mobile-friendliness. You can’t use app install interstitials that hide the content of your mobile site. In fact, just the other day, Google indicated that it’s not a fan of sneaky workarounds for this either.

    “Instead of full page interstitials, we recommend that webmasters use more user-friendly formats such as app install banners,” Google said at the time. “We hope that this change will make it easier for searchers to see the content of the pages they are looking for.”

    Some app owners have found a way around this, but what they’re doing may not help them for much longer.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points to a Q&A in a Google webmaster hangout (start at 49 minutes in).

    Someone points out Yelp specifically as an example (which is interesting given the company’s vocal opposition to Google’s policy on this) of a mobile site that uses a “splash screen that’s not really a splash screen,” because it just makes the user scroll down.

    According to Google’s John Mueller, Google may take manual actions on things like this and may even penalize sites for such practices.

    Also since the initial launch of the mobile-friendly signal, Google launched Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP), its open source project, which a number of other tech and web companies have begun participating in.

    Google has indicated that AMP isn’t (at least for now) a direct ranking signal, but that it is one way to ensure mobile-friendliness. If nothing else, it should help in the page speed department. Google has also been giving AMP pages exclusive access to the mobile news carousel.

    The mobile-friendly update was billed “Mobilegeddon” by many outlets, but it didn’t quite become that. It remains to be seen if May will see a more significant impact.

    You can find Google’s mobile-friendly test tool here.

    Do you think it’s a good idea for Google to turn up the mobile-friendly signal? Share your thoughts.

    Image via Google

  • Google Updates Smartphone User-Agent of Googlebot

    Google Updates Smartphone User-Agent of Googlebot

    Google announced that in April, it will update the smartphone user-agent of Googlebot. The company says the update is so that its renderer can better understand pages that use newer web technologies.

    Before

    Screen Shot 2016-03-15 at 4.10.41 PM

    After

    Screen Shot 2016-03-15 at 4.14.55 PM

    “Our renderer evolves over time and the user-agent string indicates that that it is becoming more similar to Chrome than Safari,” says Google software engineer Katsuaki Ikegami. “To make sure your site can be viewed properly by a wide range of users and browsers, we recommend using feature detection and progressive enhancement.”

    “Our evaluation suggests that this user-agent change should have no effect on 99% of sites,” Ikegami adds. “The most common reason a site might be affected is if it specifically looks for a particular Googlebot user-agent string. User-agent sniffing for Googlebot is not recommended and is considered to be a form of cloaking. Googlebot should be treated like any other browser.”

    Google suggests checking your site with is Fetch and Render Tool (in Search Console) if you think your site might be affected.

    The change will take place on April 18.

    Image via Google (Facebook)

  • Google Gives 3 ‘Best Practices’ For Bloggers Reviewing Free Products

    Google Gives 3 ‘Best Practices’ For Bloggers Reviewing Free Products

    On Friday, Google took to multiple company blogs to lay out a few “best practices” for bloggers and companies when it comes to the ladder giving the former free products, and the former reviewing them.

    These are to keep you compliant with Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and therefore in the search engine’s good grace (i.e. not penalized).

    The first rule (and this is not new, mind you) is to make sure that links are properly nofollowed.

    “Links that pass PageRank in exchange for goods or services are against Google guidelines on link schemes,” Google says. “Companies sometimes urge bloggers to link back to: the company’s site; the company’s social media accounts; an online merchant’s page that sells the product; a review service’s page featuring reviews of the product the company’s mobile app on an app store.”

    “Bloggers should use the nofollow tag on all such links because these links didn’t come about organically (i.e., the links wouldn’t exist if the company hadn’t offered to provide a free good or service in exchange for a link),” it adds. “Companies, or the marketing firms they’re working with, can do their part by reminding bloggers to use nofollow on these links.”

    The other two best practices are pretty simple. Disclose the relationship, and “create compelling, unique content.”

    For disclosure, Google says this can appear anywhere in a post, but that the top is the most useful placement.

    Again, none of this stuff is really new, but it’s worth noting that Google is posting this on multiple blogs. The company could be looking at this stuff more closely than in the past.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Study Dives Into Google’s Third Most Important Ranking Signal

    Study Dives Into Google’s Third Most Important Ranking Signal

    Google has been using one of its most important ranking signals for going on a year, and apparently it has so far helped improve search results on over half of queries.

    Have you noticed a marked improvement in Google search results over the past year? Let us know in the comments.

    Stone Temple Consulting, which has been publishing some of the most interesting research on Google search in recent memory, has some new findings out after a study on Google’s machine learning algorithm RankBrain. The data was gathered by comparing 500,000 search queries from both before and after RankBrain was implemented.

    According to the firm, and as far as we know, this is the only study of its kind on RankBrain.

    The study found that Google improved results on 54.6% of queries that it previously misunderstood. Examples of words and phrases RankBrain handles better, according to the firm, include: what is, who is, where is, without, not, and convert.

    RankBrain was revealed in October pretty much out of nowhere. It didn’t come in an official announcement, but from an interview Bloomberg Business ran with Greg Corrado, a senior research scientist at Google. He said that Google had introduced the algorithm on a wide scale earlier in the year and that it quickly became the third most important signal out of hundreds in Google’s ranking algorithm. Before we look more closely at Stone Temple’s findings, here’s a quick recqp of what we learned about RankBrain from that initial interview.

    1. RankBrain is the third most important ranking signal in Google Search.

    2. RankBrain was deployed several months before October.

    3. RankBrain uses artificial intelligence to put written language into mathematical entities (vectors) that computers can understand.

    4. If RankBrain sees a word/phrase it doesn’t know, the machine guesses what words/phrases might have similar meanings.

    5. RankBrain specifically helps with never-before-seen search queries.

    6. RankBrain is better than humans (even Googlers) at guessing which results Google would rank number one for various queries.

    7. RankBrain is the first Google search ranking signal that actually learns on its own.

    8. Turning RankBrain off is as damaging to users as turning off half of Wikipedia pages.

    9. RankBrain is so effective, Google engineers were surprised at how well it worked.

    10. Machine learning is a major focus of Google right now, which probably means we’ll see RankBrain itself and other endeavors in this area improve greatly in the future.

    Stone Temple’s Eric Enge suggests that Google may use RankBrain to impact selection of featured snippet results, trigger the delivery of a map where there wasn’t one shown before, and/or determine if the main impact of a given query would be an improved search results snippet.

    “Predictably, one of the most common questions I get asked is how RankBrain will impact SEO,” says Enge. “Truth be told, at the moment, there is not much impact at all. RankBrain will simply do a better job of matching user queries with your web pages, so you’d arguably be less dependent on having all the words from the user query on your page.”

    “In addition, you still need to do keyword research so that you can understand how to target a page to a major topic area (and what that major topic area is),” he adds. “Understanding the preferred language of most users will always make sense, whether or not search engines exist. If you haven’t already (hopefully you have!), you can increase your emphasis on using truly natural language on your web pages.”

    According to Enge, the real impacts of RankBrain are an increase in overall search quality and in Google’s confidence that they can use machine-leaning within the core search algorithm.

    Stone Temple put together this infographic highlighting its findings:


    On a related note, word out of SMX is that apparently Google doesn’t completely understand RankBrain and what it’s doing. Hmmm. Let’s hope the company has a better handle on what its nightmare-inducing robots are doing:

    Do you believe RankBrain is making Google a better search engine and helping users find what they’re looking for? Discuss.

    Infographic via Stone Temple Consulting

  • Video Explains Why Your Site Can Benefit From Google Direct Answers

    Video Explains Why Your Site Can Benefit From Google Direct Answers

    Webmasters have been concerned for years about the rich answers/direct answers that Google shows at the top of search results. These are the times when Google provides information directly on the search results page as opposed to sending you to another site.

    The fear is that if Google is giving users the info right there on the results page, they’ll have no reason to click over to your site. Given that this info oftentimes comes from third-party websites, some consider this to be Google scraping said sites – a practice Google of course looks down on when determining which third-party sites to show in its regular results.

    Either way, Google has shown more and more of these types of results over the years. In October, Stone Temple Consulting released some research finding that rich answers appeared in 22.6% of results pages in December 2014, growing to 31.2% in July. That number has likely risen more since then.

    This week, Stone Temple released an interesting video discussing why these types of results can actually drive traffic to your site rather than suppress it.

    You can read the transcript here if you don’t feel like sitting through the video.

  • Google Gives Updated Guidance On JavaScript, Progressive Web Apps

    Google Gives Updated Guidance On JavaScript, Progressive Web Apps

    On Friday, Google webmaster trends analyst John Mueller gave webmasters an update on the current state and recommendations for JavaScript sites and progressive web apps in Google Search.

    As he notes, none of the recommendations are completely new. In all, there are eight recommendations. I’ll give you the short version here:

    1. Use rel=canonical when serving content from multiple URLs.

    2. Avoid the AJAX-Crawling scheme on new sites.

    3. Avoid using “#” in URLs (outside of “#!”).

    4. Use Search Console’s Fetch and Render tool to test how Googlebot sees your pages.

    5. Ensure that all required resources aren’t blocked by robots.txt.

    6. Limit the number of embedded resources, in particular the number of JavaScript files and server responses required to render your page.

    7. Google supports the use of JavaScript to provide titles, description & robots meta tags, structured datas, and other meta-data.

    8. Remember that other search engines and web services accessing your content might not support JavaScript at all, or might support a different subset.

    You should definitely read Mueller’s post for additional details on each of these, including some AMP-specific guidance. Google began sending search traffic to AMP pages last month.

    Image via Google

  • Google Talks Coming Penguin Update

    Google Talks Coming Penguin Update

    There’s no telling when Google will finally launch the next, much-anticipated Penguin update. Now, Google’s Gary Illyes, who has been hinting at dates over the past year (only to have these dates pass by penguinless) has said that he’s just not going to try to give any timeframe on it anymore.

    That said, it sounds like Google is still working on hard on the update, fine-tuning it and whatnot.

    Are you anxiously awaiting the Penguin roll-out? Do you think Google is taking too long or are you happy to wait as long as thy get it right? Do you expect them to get it right? Discuss.

    So the timeframe is really up in the air at this point. The last ballpark we got from Illyes was sometime this quarter, but we’re already into March now, and there’s no telling if that’s still the case, especially after his most recent comments.

    Illyes reportedly said in a session at the Search Marketing Expo event (paraphrasing) that he will no longer estimate when Penguin 4.0 will launch because he’s already been wrong several times and it’s “bad for business”.

    Several attendees at the conference have confirmed in tweets he said something along these lines.

    He did predict a launch this quarter, but in the past, it’s been suggested that it would happen in January, and before that, before the end of 2015. It’s been going on 17 months.

    Illyes spoke with Stone Temple Consulting this week. Naturally, he was prodded about Penguin.

    He said he hasn’t checked with the staff behind Penguin for a while, but that he does check in with them to ask about it. He said that like “any human,” that the Penguin folks have a “threshold for nagging,” suggesting if he keeps nagging them about it, they’ll stop answering. He said he “knows” they are running experiments, which people can’t see externally, regardless of if they think otherwise.

    “They are running the experiments, but we will also not launch something that we are not happy with,” he told Stone Temple. “With Penguin, it can have a very strong effect on a page, and we want to make sure that if Penguin affects a page, then we are absolutely sure that that page should be affected. We don’t want to negatively affect a page without a good reason.”

    Well, webmasters would be grateful for that much.

    He also said, “I mean, first there’s lots of brute tuning going on, and after a while, you reach a phase where you have to actually do really, really tiny fine-tuning on Penguin and algorithms in general. And sometimes that fine-tuning can actually take way more time than the brute tuning. We are working hard to launch it as soon as possible. I can’t say more than that.”

    Waiting on Google to push the new Penguin has grown increasingly frustrating for businesses impacted by the update in the past, who have lost search visibility and traffic and have no way to recover until the next one comes.

    Once the next one does come, it will supposedly be continuous, meaning that sites will no longer have to wait so long to recover in the future if they make the necessary adjustments.

    Gary Illyes confirmed this again, telling Stone Temple that if pages are affected by Penguin, “generally,” they will be able to “get rid of that effect much faster.”

    “So you will definitely be able to see that there is something going on, like your rankings are dropping,” he said. “You can easily think back what you did, what you changed, if anything, on the site or external to the site, like off-site SEO, or link building, or whatever, and then revert those changes and see if that fixes it.”

    He added that they’ll still have to recrawl, noting that his can still take a lot of time. He said, “It’s real-time with the data you have available, but you don’t have the data until you recrawl…”

    No, don’t go in expecting instant recovery exactly. Still, this process will be much preferred to the past state of affairs, and certainly compared to the months of waiting that are happening right now.

    I strongly recommend you read the full interview at Stone Temple, which touches on various other worthwhile topics in addition to Penguin.

    What are your thoughts about how Google has handled Penguin? Discuss.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Google Offers Office Hours for AMP Help in 8 New Languages

    Google Offers Office Hours for AMP Help in 8 New Languages

    Google has been holding a number of AMP office hours hangouts to help publishers better understand how to implement Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) on their sites and deal with the various issues and scenarios that come along with that.

    Google began sending search traffic to AMP pages last month, and will likely only increasingly point users to these pages when applicable as time goes on. AMP isn’t a direct ranking signal yet, but it could be in the future. Google is already exclusively showing AMP content in news carousel results on mobile.

    Over the next couple of weeks, Google will roll out a new series of office hours in the following languages: French, Italian, German, Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Russian, Japanese, and Indonesian.

    The hangouts will feature product managers, technical managers, and engineers from Google, who will speak in these languages and answer questions accordingly.

    There’s a schedule of the planned office hours here.

    As reported earlier, Google has been working with Lullabot to create a Drupal 8 module that supports AMP, and the beta version is now available. They’re also working on one for Drupal 7.

    Image via Google

  • Drupal 8 Module For AMP Released in Beta

    Drupal 8 Module For AMP Released in Beta

    Google and the Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) Project announced a new Drupal 8 module that provides support for AMP. Google has been working with Lullabot to create the module, and the beta version is now available.

    The two are starting to work on a Drupal 7 version of the module as well, which will be available later this month if everything goes according to plan.

    “One of the most touted features of Drupal is its flexibility, so making Drupal produce AMP HTML has required a lot of careful consideration of the design approach,” says Lullabot’s Matthew Tift. “To make Drupal output AMP HTML, we have created an AMP module, AMP theme, and a PHP Library.”

    “When the AMP module is installed, AMP can be enabled for any content type,’ Tift adds. “At that point, a new AMP view mode is created for that content type, and AMP content becomes available on URLs such as node/1/amp or node/article-title/amp. We also created special AMP formatters for text, image, and video fields.”

    With the module, the AMP theme is triggered for any node delivered on an /amp path, and can be extended using a subtheme to give publishers more flexibility. This enables them to place AMP ad blocks on the AMP page with Drupal’s block system.

    Tift discusses the module more in this post on the AMP blog.

    For WordPress publishers, an AMP plugin was also recently made available.

    Google began sending search traffic to AMP pages last month. For now, it is only showing AMP results in the news carousel on mobile devices.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Google On AMP As a Ranking Signal

    Google On AMP As a Ranking Signal

    Google has been talking up Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) for months, promising a February launch date for when it would start sending search traffic from Google results to pages using it. Many are no doubt wondering if utilizing AMP will give them a ranking boost. Well, Google addressed that.

    Have you set up AMP for your site yet? How was the experience? Discuss.

    Earlier this week, Google began showing AMP results in search results. In fact, this came a day earlier than expected and earlier than when Google actually made the announcement. We posted about it prior to the announcement, but let’s take a moment and look at what Google has said since then.

    The announcement came on Wednesday. Google said:

    In just over four months, AMP has come a long way, with hundreds of publishers, scores of technology companies and ad-tech businesses all taking part in this joint mission to improve the mobile web for everyone. And starting today, we’ll make it easy to find AMP webpages in relevant mobile search results, giving you a lightning-fast reading experience for top stories.

    Now when you search for a story or topic on Google from a mobile device, webpages created using AMP will appear when relevant in the Top Stories section of the search results page. Any story you choose to read will load blazingly fast—and it’s easy to scroll through the article without it taking forever to load or jumping all around as you read. It’s also easy to quickly flip through the search results just by swiping from one full-page AMP story to the next.

    According to the company, pages built with AMP load an average of four times faster and use 10 times less data than equivalent non-AMP pages.

    The company didn’t mention AMP as a ranking signal in the announcement. Word around the industry was that Google would likely make it one. At launch, however, it is not. Still, that doesn’t mean it won’t become one.

    During a recent webmaster hangout, Google’s John Mueller was asked about this. Here is what he said (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    AMP a ranking signal…At the moment, it’s not a ranking signal. So it’s obviously one way to make mobile friendly pages, so that might be an option where I’ve already seen some sites where they’ve moved their whole website to the AMP format, and obviously that’s a mobile-friendly set-up, so that kind of gets that mobile-friendly boost, but just AMP itself is not something that we have as a ranking signal at the moment.

    Mobile-friendly was of course announced as a ranking signal roughly a year ago. Even if AMP isn’t directly a ranking signal on its own, it will naturally put you on the path of another ranking signal.

    In fact, stands to reason that it will help you out beyond just mobile-friendly, but also with page speed, which Google announced as a ranking signal quite some time ago.

    This week, WordPress.com sites began supporting AMP automatically, and there’s a new plugin for self-hosted WordPress sites. From the WordPress.org plugin directory:

    With the plugin active, all posts on your site will have dynamically generated AMP-compatible versions, accessible by appending /amp/ to the end your post URLs. For example, if your post URL is http://example.com/2016/01/01/amp-on/, you can access the AMP version at http://example.com/2016/01/01/amp-on/amp/. If you do not have pretty permalinks enabled, you can do the same thing by appending ?amp=1, i.e. http://example.com/2016/01/01/amp-on/?amp=1

    Note #1: that Pages and archives are not currently supported.

    Note #2: this plugin only creates AMP content but does not automatically display it to your users when they visit from a mobile device. That is handled by AMP consumers such as Google Search.

    You can find an FAQ page for AMP here.

    Do you intend to support AMP with your site? Do you already? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Google/AMP

  • Report Suggests Google Bought Links For Chrome Again [Updated]

    Report Suggests Google Bought Links For Chrome Again [Updated]

    A few years ago, Google kind of got caught violating its own webmaster guidelines. Specifically, a third party was doing some marketing for the company to promote Chrome, and they reportedly paid bloggers with gift certificates for sponsored posts. The links were not nofollowed, which is what you’re supposed to do according to Google.

    Google said at the time, “Google never agreed to anything more than online ads. We have consistently avoided paid sponsorships, including paying bloggers to promote our products, because these kind of promotions are not transparent or in the best interests of users. We’re now looking at what changes we need to make to ensure that this never happens again.”

    Once outed, Google did play by the rules and penalize the Chrome site. They may want to take another look at those changes they made to ensure it never happened again though, because it sounds like it happened again.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable reports:

    Tadeusz Szewczyk posted on Twitter that Google paid $350,000 or so to buy an image link for Google Chrome on the Let’s Encrypt sponsors page. Google is a big backer of encryption and there is no doubt they are supporting this cause. But as you can see, platinum sponsorship is $350,000.

    Google has yet to address this to our knowledge. Will it penalize Chrome again?

    Update: Google has now addressed it in a Webmaster Central hangout video (52 minutes in):

    Evidently, Google was not counting the link anyway and it has been nofollowed. According to Google’s John Mueller, the link would’t have changed the ranking of the Chrome home page anyway.

    Read Barry’s recap here.

    Image via Google

  • Google Announces AMP In Search Results

    Google Announces AMP In Search Results

    As reported on Tuesday, some users were already seeing AMP results in Google mobile search results, but there was no official announcement.

    A previous report from Ad Age indicated that the launch would come on Wednesday, and Wednesday indeed, Google made the official announcement:

    In just over four months, AMP has come a long way, with hundreds of publishers, scores of technology companies and ad-tech businesses all taking part in this joint mission to improve the mobile web for everyone. And starting today, we’ll make it easy to find AMP webpages in relevant mobile search results, giving you a lightning-fast reading experience for top stories.

    Now when you search for a story or topic on Google from a mobile device, webpages created using AMP will appear when relevant in the Top Stories section of the search results page. Any story you choose to read will load blazingly fast—and it’s easy to scroll through the article without it taking forever to load or jumping all around as you read. It’s also easy to quickly flip through the search results just by swiping from one full-page AMP story to the next.

    According to the company, pages built with AMP load an average of four times faster and use 10 times less data than equivalent non-AMP pages.

    As speed has been a ranking factor for some time, it stands to reason that using AMP will benefit you for SEO purposes.

    Images via Google