WebProNews

Tag: SEO

  • Google Still Uses Desktop Page Speed For Mobile Ranking

    As you may know, Google has been focusing on how it can better rank mobile search results. The big news last week was that it added a “Mobile-Friendly” label to results, and would give such sites a ranking boost.

    Google said this week that it will still use desktop signals for ranking mobile results. John Mueller (who we’ll pretty much consider the new Matt Cutts at this point) talked about this in a Webmaster Central hangout (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    The subject comes up at about 18 minutes and 50 seconds into the video, when someone asked him if it is correct that Google uses the page speed of a site’s desktop version as a ranking signal for the mobile version. He said that this is correct at the moment (he thinks…he tends not to completely commit to a lot of these answers).

    Mueller went on to say:

    So we need to focus on the desktop page for the search results for the most part. That’s also the one that you use with the rel canonical. As we pick up more information from mobile friendly pages or from mobile pages in general, then I would expect that to flow into the rankings as well. So that’s something to keep in mind there.

    I’d still make sure that your mobile friendly pages are as fast as possible, that they work really well on mobile devices, that you’re going past just essentially the required minimum that we had with the mobile friendly tool, and really providing a great experience on mobile. Because lots of people are using mobile to kind of make their decisions, to read content, and if your site is kind of minimally usable on mobile, but really a bad user experience, really, really slow, then that’s something that users will notice as well and they’ll jump off and do something else or go to a different site.

    It’s pretty much common sense that you want your site to be as optimal as possible, but it is interesting that Google is still using desktop signals, especially considering that there are likely more signals to glean from mobile devices.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Takes Action On Link Network In Poland

    For the past year or so, Google has been on a warpath when it comes to link networks, particularly in Europe. That is still going on, it would seem.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable reports that webmasters and SEOs noticed a spike in complaints around manual actions in “the Polish regions,” and that one got confirmation from Google Polish Webmaster representative Karolina Kruszyńska. This reportedly said:

    Yes, we have taken action against one of the systems to exchange links.

    She later tweeted:

    Matt Cutts has often been the one to talk about this stuff, but he’s not with Google for the time being. Clearly, his absence has done little to stop Google from going after European link networks.

    Poland was specifically mentioned by Google as an area of action back in July. Other areas Google has targeted include France, Germany, and other areas of Europe.

    Image via Google

  • Google: We Don’t Plan On Updating PageRank Again

    The writing has been on the wall for quite some time, but if you’re still clinging to any shred of hope that Google will be updating Toolbar PageRank again, it’s probably time to give it up.

    Do you think Toolbar PageRank should go away, or do you still have a purpose for relying on it? Let us know in the comments.

    It was pretty clear last month that PageRank is dead, when Google’s John Mueller (who has pretty much taken over for Matt Cutts when it comes to communicating these types of things to Webmasters), said, “PageRank is something that we haven’t updated for I think over a year now, and we’re probably not going to be updating it going forward, at least in the Toolbar PageRank…”

    The subject came up again in a Webmaster Help thread. This time he said (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    I wouldn’t use PageRank or links as a metric. We’ve last updated PageRank more than a year ago (as far as I recall) and have no plans to do further updates. Think about what you want users to do on your site, and consider an appropriate metric for that.

    He also linked to this post from Google’s Webmaster Central Blog from 2011 titled “Beyond PageRank: Graduating to actionable Metrics”.

    In that post, Google’ Susan Moskwa said to focus on things like conversion rates, bounce rates, and clickthrough rates, rather than PageRank.

    The last PageRank update was actually just under a year ago on December 6th. Even that update was just the result of some other changes. It wasn’t Google just updating PageRank to make it more useful.

    So if you don’t count that, you’re looking at close to two years since a legitimate update. It’s been much longer since most in the industry have considered it a legitimate metric anyway.

    As you may recall, Cutts talked about PageRank in a video over a year ago, discussing how it no longer has a lot of value, and why your site’s PageRank isn’t changing.

    “Over time, the Toolbar PageRank is getting less usage just because recent versions of Internet Explorer don’t really let you install toolbars as easily, and Chrome doesn’t have the toolbar so over time, the PageRank indicator will probably start to go away a little bit,” he said.

    The phasing out of PageRank is hardly a surprise.

    In another video before that one, he said, “Maybe it will go away on its own or eventually we’ll reach the point where we say, ‘Okay, maintaining this is not worth the amount of work.’”

    It seems that Google has reached that point.

    Would you like to see Google continue to update Toolbar PageRank, or is this a good riddance situation as far as you’re concerned? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Google

  • Is Amazon Part Of Your Search Strategy?

    If you sell something online, and you’re not showing up in Amazon search results, you might be missing out on a major opportunity. This is especially true as we enter the holiday season.

    Do you have search visibility on Amazon? Is this a priority for your business? Let us know in the comments.

    Compete has released some interesting numbers on Amazon and how it related to consumers’ searching habits. Considering that Google thinks of Amazon as its biggest rival in this department, these are worth paying attention to.

    75 million consumers conducted at least one search on Amazon in September, though only 30% ever clicked beyond the first page of search results, it says.

    According to Compete, when a user searches on Amazon, there’s a 35% chance they’ll click on products listed first in any search, compared to a 17% chance for items listed second. They’re ten times more likely to click on items listed first then on items listed tenth.

    Amazon itself accounted for 22% of visits to any online retailer in September (up from 19% last year). The top 5 online retailers combined for about half of all visits.

    “For manufacturers of toys, diapers, groceries, auto parts, and everything in between, being on Amazon, and more importantly being seen by consumers on the site, is paramount to ecommerce success,” says Compete’s Mattt Pace. “Amazon acts as the Wikipedia of ecommerce for many consumers: it’s their de facto jumping off point for online shopping.”

    “To succeed in ecommerce, consumer product brands need greater visibility into consumers’ path to purchase for their brands and categories… both across the web and within key retailer websites like Amazon,” he says. “Understanding how consumers shop enables brands to optimize their channel investments to drive greater awareness, consideration and purchase of their products.”

    According to Compete, the average shopper returns to Amazon 2.8 times per month to search for products.

    Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt recently said, “Really, our biggest search competitor is Amazon. People don’t think of Amazon as search, but if you are looking for something to buy, you are more often than not looking for it on Amazon. They are obviously more focused on the commerce side of the equation, but, at their roots, they are answering users’ questions and searches, just as we are.”

    So how do you rank in Amazon? Well there’s not nearly as much research out there on the topic compared to ranking in traditional search engines, but Nathan Grimm posted an in-depth look at Moz a few months ago. That’s probably a good place to start. He breaks down the key differences between Amazon and Google, and looks at results page mechanics, ranking factors, tracking your progress, and other visibility systems.

    I will pull an excerpt from Amazon’s own documentation that he references:

    “Search is the primary way that customers use to locate products on Amazon.com. Customers search by entering keywords, which are matched against the search terms you enter for a product. Well-chosen search terms increase a product’s visibility and sales. The number of views for a product detail page can increase significantly by adding just one additional search term – if it’s a relevant and compelling term.

    “Factors such as price, availability, selection, and sales history help determine where your product appears in a customer’s search results. In general, better-selling products tend to be towards the beginning of the results list. As your sales of a product increase, so does your placement.”

    So if you’re talking about ranking factors, Amazon is basically naming a few of them here: keywords, price, availability, selection, and sales history.

    When many businesses think about being seen in the search engines, they think about Google, Bing, and Yahoo, but if your’e selling a product, and you’re not thinking about getting Amazon search visibility you might be missing out on an important opportunity.

    Is Amazon part of your search strategy? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via Compete

  • Google Tests Feature That Could Keep Even More Traffic From Sites

    Google is apparently testing a feature that could lead to even less clicks from users to third-party websites.

    Is Google going too far with its on-site content? Should it be sending more traffic to publishers? Let us know what you think.

    As you’re no doubt aware, Google provides quick answer results for numerous queries. These attempt to give you the best answer right on the Google results page, and often pull from third-party sites, reducing the chances that the user will click through and send traffic to the site providing the answer.

    IgniteVisibility shows a screenshot (via Search Engine Land) of a feature Google appears to be testing, which provides five different answers from the box, enabling the user to scroll through them. Here’s what it looks like:

    According to the blog, the feature is appearing on mobile, but not desktop, though this could easily change or not even be consistent with another user’s experience. We’re unable to reproduce the feature at all.

    While some publishers will be concerned about the potential for reducing traffic, one could argue that having more results in that top box could help the sites that appear in the boxes. At least they’re getting prime search visibility.

    Most will no doubt be of the former mindset, especially considering that this was already a major concern before Google started multiplying the number of answers it actually shows.

    Google doesn’t really care that much about what publishers think of such moves though. As we’ve heard the company say over and over again, they’re catering to users – not publishers. If it’s a better user experience, that’s what they’re going to go with.

    Truth be told, from the user perspective, this probably is an upgrade. Unfortunately, the information Google pulls isn’t always necessarily going to be 100% accurate, but that’s another issue altogether.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable has an interesting idea about how Google could make publishers feel better about the quick answers they show. Again, Google probably doesn’t care that much, but it’s not a bad concept.

    As we recently saw, Google has been showing call-to-action links for some of these types of results when it comes from its own websites. There’s one that says “show me how,” for example that accompanies the steps for adding negative keywords to AdWords.

    Barry’s idea is that Google could give webmasters an option in Webmaster Tools to have a similar link and icon, but be able to control those things, kind of like how Google does with sitelinks.

    As it stands, some webmasters consider Google a scaper of their content when it comes to this stuff. It is possible that offering such a feature could ease some of those tensions.

    While Google isn’t typically inclined to bother appeasing webmasters’ wishes, occasionally it does deliver on requested features. It took awhile, but the Disavow Links tool is a good example of that. You never know.

    For the time being, it looks like webmasters are just going to have to continue to deal with the curveballs Google throws at them. Keep in mind, however, that this one appears to just be a test so far.

    Do you think this is a good feature? What do you think of Barry’s concept? Do you think Google would consider offering something like that? Discuss.

    Image via IgniteVisibility

  • Google Adds ‘Mobile-Friendly’ Label To Results, Gives Sites Ranking Boost

    Google Adds ‘Mobile-Friendly’ Label To Results, Gives Sites Ranking Boost

    Update: Google’s official announcement is now live.

    Much of Google’s work in search this year, as well as its guidance for webmasters, has been related to mobile search. Google has really ramped up its efforts of late to improve the mobile search experience, as more and more people perform more and more searches from their smartphones.

    Now, the company is putting a special emphasis on sites that are “mobile-friendly,” while giving them possible ranking boosts.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Land reports (we’re not seeing the official announcement on the web just yet) that Google has officially launched the mobile-friendly label in mobile search results, while Danny Sullivan says Google is “experimenting” with giving sites that have earned the label “some type of special treatment within its ranking algorithm”.

    Sullivan shares this quote from a Google post, which doesn’t appear to be live yet: “We see these labels as a first step in helping mobile users to have a better mobile web experience. We are also experimenting with using the mobile-friendly criteria as a ranking signal.”

    According to Schwartz’s report, sites can earn the label by avoiding software that’s not common on mobile devices (such as Flash), using readable (without zooming) text, sizing content to the screen so users don’t have to scroll horizontally or zoom, and placing links far enough apart so the right one can easily be tapped.

    Menawhile, Google is asking mobile users to rate search results.

    A couple weeks ago, Google announced a new feature in Webmaster Tools to help webmasters track mobile usability.

    Prior to that, it had been notifying webmasters about sites with faulty redirects in mobile results to save users the “common annoyance” of tapping a search result only to be redirected to a site’s mobile homepage. Google has also been noting when pages “may not work on your device” because of things like Flash.

    Images via Google

  • Google Adds Call To Action Links To Quick Answer Results

    Google is showing users “Show me how” links for some of its quick answer results. Unfortunately, so far, the only examples we’ve seen point you to Google’s own content.

    Search Engine Roundtable points to an example shared by Tommy Sands on Google+, which is for the query “adwords negative keywords”. Search for that, and you’ll likely get a four-step quick answer result, followed by “Show me how”. Clicking on that takes you to an official AdWords page.

    google answer links

    A commenter on that report points to another example for “open gmail account”. This time, it gives you a link for “Go to Account Creation”.

    google answer links

    If you try a non-Google product-related search as “how to make french toast,” you don’t get links like this (at least we haven’t seen any yet).

    google answers

    The French toast example does have a link to the source site, but Google seems satisfied that it’s given you all the content you need from it, unlike with the examples from its own content, despite there being more information, like a video, on the French toast example.

    It’s clear that Google is showing more and more of these “answers,” and some webmasters are worried about losing traffic they would otherwise get from the search engine. While calls to action like those it’s showing for its own results could help with that, it’s not clear that Google is bothering with them when it comes to third-party content.

    Images via Google

  • Twitter Regretting Not Getting That Google Deal Done?

    Twitter Regretting Not Getting That Google Deal Done?

    Remember the days when you could search for something that was in the news on Google and get a set of realtime search results comprised mainly (but not solely) of updates from Twitter? It was a helpful feature that let you get a glance at what people were saying about a given topic at that moment, and in some cases, provided the absolute most relevant results Google could possibly deliver.

    The realtime search feature went away after Google and Twitter failed to reach an agreement that would have extended the partnership. Twitter continued a similar partnership with Bing, but that just doesn’t get the usage Google does, and it appears now that Twitter may have some regrets about letting that Google deal fall apart.

    This week, Twitter held its Analyst Day event, where it discussed some things it is doing to help promote user growth. One thing it didn’t really go into in its blog post about various projects it’s working on to accomplish that, is trying to get more search traffic. This is something that would obviously come if that deal were still in place. Marketing Land reports:

    During the event this morning, Twitter’s CFO Anthony Noto suggested that Twitter would do more to generate search engine optimization traffic, free traffic from Google and other search engines. It’s something Noto said Twitter hadn’t really done in the past.

    Trevor O’Brien, Twitter’s director of product management, expanded on this later to say that Twitter made a change earlier this year to allow Google and other search engines to crawl its top 50,000 hashtagged search pages, which has generated a 10-fold increase in the number of logged-out people coming to Twitter — helping that figure rise to 75 million per month.

    It’s unclear whether Twitter has approached Google about starting up that deal again, which would actually benefit users to some extent, though it’s hard to say if Google would be interested at this point.

    Truth be told, Google’s feature was never really as helpful for realtime searches as a search directly on Twitter anyway, but again, there are a lot more people using Google in the first place.

    It’s worth noting that Twitter wasn’t a public company that had to worry so much about pleasing investors concerned about user growth when it didn’t renew its deal with Google.

    Image via Twitter

  • Bing: We’re Not Giving Up On Search [Updated]

    Update 2: Asked for additional comment or further clarification on Stefan’s comments, the spokesperson says, “We have nothing further to share.”

    Update: The initial headline to this article was “Bing Abandons Hope Of Competing With Google (In ‘Pure’ Search)”. Bing apparently takes issue with this. A spokesperson says it’s a “misrepresentation of Bing’s position, as well as Stefan Weitz’s statement. Bing is not giving up on search.”

    Well, the headline didn’t exactly say “Bing is Giving Up On Search,” but clearly they’re defensive about it. I’ve reached out to Bing for a more official statement.

    It’s unclear if they were okay with Search Engine Land’s version: “Bing: It’s Unlikely That We’ll Take Search Share Away From Google”. It’s also unclear if the Register’s quotes were inaccurate. So far, I don’t see any updates on either of these articles. Take from that what you will.

    Original article: It’s been a while since we’ve heard much about the “Bing it On” challenge, which was Bing’s attempt to convince people it provided a better search experience than Google, even though the challenge stripped out key features of both search engines. It did little to advance Bing’s market share.

    The holidays are just around the corner, and we haven’t seen any new “Scroogled” campaigns (because it’s a play on Scrooge, not “Screw Google,” remember?) emerge yet. That could still happen. These ads didn’t always focus on search, but stretched into other areas like email and computers.

    It appears that Bing is basically abandoning hope that it will actually take a significant amount of market share away from Google when it comes to pure search. Bing’s Stefan Weitz spoke at the Web Summit this week. The Register (via Search Engine Land) shares some quotes from him:

    “The question is, where is search really going?” he said at the Web Summit conference in Dublin today. “It’s unlikely we’re going to take share in [the pure search] space, but in machine learning, natural language search… and how we can make search more part of living. For us, it’s less about Bing.com, though that’s still important. It’s really about how we can instead weave the tech into things you’re already doing.”

    “For pure keyword search, we’re around 30 per cent in the US, not so much in Europe,” he said. “But search in different areas of life? That mix is to be determined. I’m committed to making sure we have our fair share of search in the future.”

    In terms of advertising, the Yahoo Bing “search alliance” saw its biggest paid search market share increase in five years in Q3, according to research released by IgnitionOne. This followed Yahoo’s search market share hitting its lowest point ever in the summer, though things are looking up for Yahoo on the search front based on the company’s latest earnings report.

    Image via Bing.com (Yes, you can just type in a “W” and get a suggestion to go to www.Google.com).

  • Is The Matt Cutts Era Over?

    Is The Matt Cutts Era Over?

    It’s not 100% clear yet, but it’s looking like for webmasters and SEOs, the era of Matt Cutts is a thing of the past. His career at Google may continue, but it doesn’t sound like he’ll be the head of webspam going forward.

    Would you like to see Matt Cutts return to the role he’s held for years, or do you look forward to change in the search department? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    It’s a pretty interesting time in search right now. Matt Cutts, who has been the go-to guy for webmaster help and Q&A related to Google search for quite a few years, has been on leave from the company since July. Meanwhile, his counterpart over at Bing has been let go from his duties at Microsoft.

    When Cutts announced his leave, he didn’t really make it sound like he wouldn’t be back, but rather like he would be taking a nice,long, much-deserved vacation. He wrote on his blog:

    I wanted to let folks know that I’m about to take a few months of leave. When I joined Google, my wife and I agreed that I would work for 4-5 years, and then she’d get to see more of me. I talked about this as recently as last month and as early as 2006. And now, almost fifteen years later I’d like to be there for my wife more. I know she’d like me to be around more too, and not just physically present while my mind is still on work.

    So we’re going to take some time off for a few months. My leave starts next week. Currently I’m scheduled to be gone through October. Thanks to a deep bench of smart engineers and spam fighters, the webspam team is in more-than-capable hands. Seriously, they’re much better at spam fighting than I am, so don’t worry on that score.

    Scheduled to be gone through October. See? Pretty much sounds like a vacation. As you know, October has since come and gone. On October 31, Cutts provided another update, saying he was extending his leave, and wouldn’t be back at Google this year.

    Ok, fine. Cutts has been at Google for fourteen years, and can probably take a considerable amount of time off with no problem. But he’d be back in the swing of things in the new year, right? Well, he might be back, but what he’ll be doing remains to be seen.

    Cutts appeared on the web chat show This Week in Google, hosted by Leo Laporte, who asked him if he’ll go back to the same role, or if this is a chance for him to try something different. This part of the conversation starts at about 9 minutes and 50 seconds in to the video below (h/t: Search Engine Roundtable).

    “Well, I really have been impressed with how well everyone else on the team is doing, and it’s created a little bit of an opportunity for them to try new things, explore different stuff, you know, approach problems from a different way, and so we’ll have to see how it goes,” Cutts responded. “I loved the part of my job that dealt with keeping an eye on what important news was happening related to Google, but you know, it’s not clear that having me as a lightning rod, you know for, you know unhappy black hat SEOs or something is the best use of anybody’s time compared to working on other things that could be making the world better for Google or in general. So we’ll see how it all works.”

    It doesn’t really sounds like he intends to go back to the classic Matt Cutts role. In fact, later in the discussion, he referred to the initial leave as the “official” leave, implying that the one he’s now on is open-ended.

    Laporte asked him if he has the ability at the company to just do something different if he wants to.

    He said, “The interesting thing is that at Google they try to get you and go do different projects, so the product managers, they encourage you to rotate every two or three years, and so it’s relatively rare to find people who have been around forever in a specific area. You’ll find Amit [Singhal] in search, Sridhar [Ramaswamy], you know, some of these people that are really, really senior, you know – higher ranking than me for sure – they do stick around in one area, but a lot of other people jump to different parts of the company to furnish different skills and try different things, which is a pretty good idea, I think.”

    Again, it sounds like he would really like to do something different within the company.

    He also reiterated his confidence in the current webspam team. On his “colleagues” (he prefers that term to “minions”), he said, “I just have so much admiration for you know, for example, last year, there was a real effort on child porn because of some stuff that happened in the United Kingdom, and a lot of people chipped in, and that is not an easy job at all. So you really have to think hard about how you’re gonna try to tackle this kind of thing.”

    Jeff Jarvis, who was also on the show, asked Cutts what other things interest him.

    Cutts responded, “Oh man, I was computer graphics and actually inertial trackers and accelerometers in grad school. At one point I said, you know, you could use commodity hardware, but as a grad student, you don’t have access to influence anybody’s minds, so why don’t I just go do something else for ten years, and somebody else will come up with all these sensors, and sure enough, you’ve got Kinect, you have the Wii, you know, the iPhone. Now everybody’s got a computer in their pocket that can do 3D sensing as long as write the computer programs well. So there’s all kinds of interesting stuff you could do.”

    Will we see Matt working on the Android team? As a matter of fact, Laporte followed that up by mentioning Andy Rubin – the guy who created Android and brought it to Google – leaving the company. News of that came out last week.

    Matt later said, “I’ll always have a connection and soft spot for Google…”

    That’s actually a bit more mysterious of a comment. I don’t want to put any words in the guy’s mouth, but to me, that sounds like he’s not married to the company for the long haul.

    Either way, webmasters are already getting used to getting updates and helpful videos from Googlers like Pierre Far and John Mueller. We’ve already seen Google roll out new Panda and Penguin updates since Cutts has been on leave, and the SEO world hasn’t come crumbling down.

    I’m guessing Cutts is getting less hate mail these days. He must have been getting tired of disgruntled website owners bashing him online all the time. It’s got to be nice to not have to deal with that all the time.

    As I said at the beginning of the article, it’s really not clear what Matt’s future holds, so all we can really do is listen to what he’s said, and look for him to update people further on his plans.

    In the meantime, if you miss him, you can peruse the countless webmaster videos and comments he’s made over the years that we’ve covered here.

    Do you expect Matt Cutts to return to search in any capacity? Do you expect him to return to Google? Should he? Do you miss him already? Let us know what you think.

  • Report: Big-Spending SMBs Prioritize Search

    Search engine marketing is the top digital marketing priority for most higher-spending small and medium-sized businesses, according to anew report from BIA/Kelsey. These are businesses spending over $25,000 a year on advertising and promotion. On average, they’re spending $79,000.

    60.6% rated search advertising and marketing (including SEO) as an “extremely high” or “very high” priority for the coming twelve months. 20.7% reported using PPC advertising in the previous 12 months, compared to 19.6% in 2013.

    “The LCM [Local Commerce Monitor – the study] findings indicate small businesses want to improve on the ability for consumers to discover them,” said Steve Marshall, director of research, at BIA/Kelsey. “SEM, SEO, and pay per click are fundamental to achieving this goal, particularly with the growth of mobile search.”

    According to the firm, local search revenues are expected to reach $7.2 billion in 2015, which would be up from $7.1 billion this year. It maintains that local mobile search will account for 51.1% of mobile ad spending in 2015.

    The LCM recently found that small businesses spend more on social media than any other media category with Facebook dominating at 55.1% of SMBs reporting they have Pages.

    BIA/Kelsey will release additional findings at an upcoming local media conference in December.

    Image via BIA/Kelsey

  • Google: WMT Automated Action Viewer ‘Not On The Horizon’

    Google: WMT Automated Action Viewer ‘Not On The Horizon’

    Google Webmaster Trends Analyst John Mueller hosted a Webmaster Central Office Hours hangout on Tuesday, and talked about he prospect of Google adding a feature to Webmaster Tools, which would let them know about automated actions that were taken against their sties, and how webmasters could go about fixing any issues.

    This was buried nearly forty minutes (38 minutes and 36 seconds to be precise) into the video, which itself is over an hour long.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable pulled this tidbit including a transcript out of the video. Here are some excerpts:

    I think it might make sense at some point to find something that does something similar to what these algorithms are doing and bubble that up to the webmaster and say, hey, our Webmaster Tools quality check has recognized that these and these and these types of pages are generally lower quality. Maybe that’s something you want to look at. But I don’t think it would make sense to take the search ranking algorithms and kind of bubble that information up directly in Webmaster Tools just because it has a very different goal. But I do bring this up with the Webmaster Tools and the engineering team every now and then to make sure that we don’t lose track of that because I think sometimes, some of the information from these algorithms could be really useful to webmasters.

    These are definitely things that we’re always looking into and thinking about how much we could put more of this into Webmaster Tools, how much we have the technical details covered in Webmaster Tools, and say, well, technically, Webmaster Tools covers everything you need. Now we need to focus on kind of the softer factors. They’re always long discussions. I mean, if there’s something we can bubble up in Webmaster Tools there, I think I’d definitely be for that. But we really need to make sure that we’re bubbling up something that’s really actionable for you guys, not something where you see, oh, well, our algorithms think your site is kind of mediocre. And that doesn’t really help you.

    But all of this is probably fairly far off. It’s definitely not something where you’ll see this showing up in Webmaster Tools the next week or so. But we do try to bring these things into the discussions with the Webmaster Tools team and with the engineering teams to try to see how much of the information that we create about a website can be shown to the webmaster to help guide them in the right way.

    Mueller also commented on Schwart’z post about all of this adding, “Just to clarify, this is not ‘on the horizon.’ While we talk about ideas like these internally & externally, that doesn’t mean that they’re coming anytime soon, or even at all. I love seeing big steps being taken with our products, and you have to start with an idea, but ultimately not all ideas can be realized :).”

    In other words, keep dreaming.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Penguin Update Still Lurking, Keep An Eye Out

    Google Penguin Update Still Lurking, Keep An Eye Out

    It’s been a while since Google launched the most recent version of its famous (or infamous, depending on how you want to look at it) Penguin update. If you haven’t seen any changes in your rankings, don’t assume you’re in the clear just yet. After all this time it’s still rolling out. Keep holding your breath.

    Have you seen any changes since Penguin began rolling out? Positive or negative? Let us know in the comments.

    With Matt Cutts not due back at work any time in the foreseeable future, we’re going to have to continue to rely on Googlers like John Mueller and Pierre Far to give us updates on what’s going on with the ever-changing algorithm.

    About eighteen days ago, Google launched a long-anticipated Penguin update (it took over a year to finally launch).

    Far said a few days after the initial roll-out announcement that this Penguin would be a “slow worldwide rollout” and that it would settle down “over the next few weeks”.

    Confirmation came on Monday that the update is still in fact rolling out. Mueller participated in a Webmaster Central Office Hours hangout (via Alex Graves at David Naylor), and said as much.

    In the video, one person says they saw sites disappear to page 20 and 30 after the update launched, and the sites apparently went back to the first page. He asked if there was a reason the algorithm reversed the “spammy sites”.

    Mueller said he didn’t know about any specific sites, but said as far as he knows, the data is still rolling out.

    “You might just be seeing fluctuations from that,” he said, then reiterated that it’s still rolling out “as far he knows.”

    Mueller also said that Google probably wouldn’t take into account any new disavow files for “this round,” but that it’s never too late to use them. The reason why it won’t take them into account this time is because they have to re-crawl all the links. It’s not the case that these files are processed instantly.

    “We essentially have to re-crawl all those links, and then that data is taken into account the next time the algorithms use that data, so it’s never too late. It’s something where if you see problems, I’d definitely submit that file, and make sure that you have it in there, but it’s probably not going to take effect for this round,” he said.

    Who knows how long it will take for the next round to come? It took over a year last time, but Google has implied that Penguin will be refreshed more regularly going forward. We’ll see.

    By the way, remember when Google basically used to say that most people shouldn’t use the disavow tool?

    Googler Gary Illyes said ahead of the Penguin roll-out that this particular update should make webmasters’ lives easier, and that people would find it to be a “delight”. Considering it’s still rolling out, I guess the jury’s out on that one.

    How’s the Penguin treated you? Have you noticed any significant improvement in search results in general? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Matt Cutts Won’t Be Back At Google Any Time Soon

    Back in July, Google’s head of webspam Matt Cutts announced that he was taking an extended leave from work to enjoy his personal life. On Friday, he revealed in a tweet (via Search Engine Roundtable) that he won’t be back to work at all this year.

    Cutts didn’t really elaborate on why he’s extending his leave, but if you could do it, why not, right? He did say this on his blog back in July:

    I wanted to let folks know that I’m about to take a few months of leave. When I joined Google, my wife and I agreed that I would work for 4-5 years, and then she’d get to see more of me. I talked about this as recently as last month and as early as 2006. And now, almost fifteen years later I’d like to be there for my wife more. I know she’d like me to be around more too, and not just physically present while my mind is still on work.

    So we’re going to take some time off for a few months. My leave starts next week. Currently I’m scheduled to be gone through October. Thanks to a deep bench of smart engineers and spam fighters, the webspam team is in more-than-capable hands. Seriously, they’re much better at spam fighting than I am, so don’t worry on that score.

    In Matt’s absence, the industry had relied on updates from people like Google Webmaster Trends analysts John Mueller and Pierre Far. There have been both new Panda and Penguin updates to roll out during Matt’s leave.

    It remains to be seen when Cutts will return, but there’s not really that much of 2014 left. I’d expect him to return after the New Year. We’ll see.

    Webmasters must be itching for more of Cutts’ famous YouTube videos.

    Image via YouTube

  • Here’s How To Disable Google’s Sitelinks Search Box

    Last month, Google announced that it is now showing a new and improved sitelinks search box within search results for some sites. Its aim is to help users find specific content on third-party sites more easily.

    The box is now more prominent, and supports autocomplete.

    Webmasters can markup their sites so Google has the ability to display this in search results for their brands. There’s also a way you can specifically tell Google you don’t want this to appear for your site.

    Barry Schwartz points to a Google+ post from Menashe Avramov pointing out that you can disable the box using the following meta tag:

    <meta name=”google” content=”nositelinksearchbox”>

    I guess this way, you can encourage users to actually use your site to do the searching. Either that, or it will encourage them to get more specific with their Google search. I’m not sure how often these boxes are being used anyway, but it must be a substantial enough amount of people for Google to even offer the feature.

    Image via Google

  • Google Penguin Update: You May Not Be Safe Just Yet

    As you may have heard, Google has launched a new Penguin update. It’s the first one in over a year, and has been anticipated pretty much since the last one. The update brings both good and bad news. It’s good for those who were affected in the past, and have been waiting for a chance to recover. It’s bad for sites that may face the wrath of the new Penguin (3.0).

    Have you noticed any impact from the update so far? Good or bad? Let us know in the comments.

    The previous update was released in October 2013. A year is a really long time to wait for a chance for recovery, and Google has been heavily criticized for being so slow with Penguin. Either way, it’s here now, but it’s not finished. If you’ve not noticed any effect so far, that doesn’t mean you’re in the clear.

    Early reports from Search Engine Roundtable confirmed with Google that the update began on Friday evening, and then cited comments from Google’s John Mueller that he thought the roll-out was already complete by Monday morning. Well, that was wrong (I know. Google sending mixed messages? Never.)

    Google’s Pierre Far, which seems to be the chief webmaster updater on major algorithm changes, at least in the absence of Matt Cutts, gave an update about Penguin 3.0 indicating that it has only just begun, so don’t start resting easy just yet.

    Pierre wrote on Google+:

    On Friday last week, we started rolling out a Penguin refresh affecting fewer than 1% of queries in US English search results. This refresh helps sites that have already cleaned up the webspam signals discovered in the previous Penguin iteration, and demotes sites with newly-discovered spam.

    It’s a slow worldwide rollout, so you may notice it settling down over the next few weeks.

    There you go. This thing is going to go on for weeks. That explains why early analysis showed little disruption in data from third-party providers, as pointed out by Search Engine Journal and various others in the industry.

    As you may know, Google also recently launched a refresh to the Panda update, which was also a slow roll-out. It’s unclear if that one’s still happening. Last we heard, it was, but that was a while ago.

    Google has been teasing a new Penguin for quite some time. The discussion picked up steam in recent weeks. Google webmaster trends analyst Gary Illyes spoke at SMX East indicating the update was on its way, and that it would make webmasters’ lives easier. For most people, he reportedly said, it would be a “delight”.

    The word delight isn’t often used in the same sentence with the words Google Penguin Update, but that does give some glimmer of hope, not only for those affected by the update in the past, but for future victims, who may not have to struggle as hard to recover as the pioneers of Penguin victimhood.

    Illyes indicated that Penguin refreshes would become more frequent with the new algorithm, which would presumably put it more in line with Panda.

    He also mentioned that if you had just disavowed bad links within the past few weeks, it likely wouldn’t help you with this update. That’s not particularly great news for those who have done so, but is still helpful to know. At least the refreshes will happen more often.

    There is still some confusion as to if this current Penguin roll-out actually does work as advertised, or if these improvements will come later.

    Barry Schwartz makes the point: “Pierre said ‘refresh,’ which means to me there were no new signals added to the algorithm, that the only thing Google did was rerun the algorithm. Why couldn’t they just ‘refresh’ the algorithm several months ago is beyond me. I thought we were waiting for a major rewrite that adds more signals and makes it faster to run?”

    Far did, however, call it an “update” in the title of his post: “Penguin Update Rolling Out”. There technically is a difference between update and refresh, though I feel like they’re used interchangeably by webmasters and possibly Googlers alike sometimes, which just makes things all the more confusing.

    Cutts has explained this in the past. He compared updates to auto parts and refreshed to gas, if that helps.

    I would imagine this will be cleared up soon, but in the meantime, all we know for sure is that there is some iteration of Penguin rolling out currently, and it will be rolling out all over the world over the coming weeks. For a lot of webmasters that is probably enough for the time being.

    What do you think of Google’s new approach to Penguin? Do you expect to be delighted? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Google Finally Launches Another Penguin Update

    Update: It turns out the update is not finished rolling out, and will continue to roll-out worldwide over the coming weeks. Read this.

    Webmasters and SEOs have been waiting for Google to launch a new Penguin update for over a year, and now they’ve finally gotten what they asked for.

    The company launched the update on Friday night, and it’s apparently already completed the roll out. That went much more quickly than the recent slow-rolling Panda update.

    Before this latest Penguin, Google hadn’t launched one since October 2013. The company has been teasing the new one for a while now.

    There has been speculation of a new Penguin from time to time, but this one has been confirmed by Google, according to Search Engine Roundtable. It launched Friday night, and was confirmed on Sunday. Google’s John Mueller said the roll-out was complete on Monday morning as far as he knew.

    Ahead of the update, Google recently spoke about it at an industry conference, saying the new Penguin would make webmasters lives easier, and that most people would find it to be a “delight”. I guess we’ll see how that plays out.

    More on that here.

    Image via YouTube

  • Is This New Panda Update Helping Small Sites?

    If you’re feeling the effects of a Google algorithm update this week, there’s a good chance it’s Panda. No, Google hasn’t already launched another one. It’s still the last one. It’s just not done rolling out (at least as of Monday).

    Have you felt the effects of Google’s algorithm this week? Let us know in the comments.

    On September 25th, Google launched the update, which it suggested should help small sites. Google’s Pierre Far said on Google+:

    Earlier this week, we started a slow rollout of an improved Panda algorithm, and we expect to have everything done sometime next week. Based on user (and webmaster!) feedback, we’ve been able to discover a few more signals to help Panda identify low-quality content more precisely. This results in a greater diversity of high-quality small- and medium-sized sites ranking higher, which is nice. Depending on the locale, around 3-5% of queries are affected.

    Search Engine Land reported on Monday that the roll-out was still occurring, claiming to have confirmed as much with Google. That is indeed a “slow rollout,” and webmaster/SEOs are still feeling the effects.

    A new Penguin update is on the way as well, but we still don’t know exactly when that will hit. It could be as early this week, but will most likely happen before the end of the year at the latest.

    So, has the latest Panda update actually been helping smaller sites? Well, probably some, but others feel like they’re being left out in the cold, while others are just generally skeptical.

    “I still don’t see small businesses appearing in the search results,” one reader recently commented. “I suspect this new Panda is just more smoke and mirrors from Google…”

    Another said, “There is nothing favorable for small business in this update.”

    That was early in the roll-out, however, and if it’s still rolling out, who knows how long it will actually take.

    Searchmetrics put out its regular lists of winners and losers from the Panda update, which are as follows:

    Losers:

        Domain – Loser     Before     After   Change in %
    yellow.com  16383 3413 -79%
    similarsites.com  118771 25197 -79%
    free-coloring-pages.com  12268 2960 -76%
    dwyer-inst.com  13225 3229 -76%
    issitedownrightnow.com  69354 18376 -74%
    updatestar.com  13232 3788 -71%
    office365.com  29365 8781 -70%
    findthebest.com  30848 93937 -70%
    homewyse.com  14161 4410 -69%
    adelaide.edu.au  20351 6537 -68%
    pearltrees.com  16769 5503 -67%
    ok.co.uk  18226 5995 -67%
    socialcomments.org  27476 9058 -67%
    mybillcom.com  12258 4136 -66%
    tgiblackfriday.com  10037 3420 -66%
    discountsstory.net  20907 7337 -65%
    indyweek.com  13373 4826 -64%
    zabasearch.com  42679 15697 -63%
    exacttarget.com  14849 5729 -61%
    okc.gov  12547 4907 -61%
    no1reviews.com  18403 7235 -61%
    mademan.com  23006 9779 -57%
    studymode.com  10756 4611 -57%
    thefair.com  14067 6277 -55%
    appappeal.com  11265 5149 -54%
    chronicle.com  17244 8208 -52%
    lyricstranslations.com  16944 8077 -52%
    onhealth.com  118017 56735 -52%
    cherrybam.com  20178 9736 -52%
    nerve.com  17264 9016 -48%
    emedtv.com  30739 16266 -47%
    hubpages.com  30493 163548 -46%
    brothersoft.com  25357 13969 -45%
    collider.com  47733 26383 -45%
    337.com  21172 12141 -43%
    hypestat.com  18047 10553 -42%
    telecomfile.com  17652 10448 -41%
    discountednewspapers.com  19472 11624 -40%
    bugmenot.com  25339 15152 -40%
    medterms.com  286956 172836 -40%
    translationcloud.com  43295 2674 -38%
    archive.today  48603 30085 -38%
    game-oldies.com  47279 2932 -38%
    kxan.com  26622 16609 -38%
    thinkbabynames.com  22762 14246 -37%
    amtrakcalifornia.com  18965 1192 -37%
    theepochtimes.com  34385 21638 -37%
    addresses.com  33042 21012 -36%
    hrblock.com  24599 15775 -36%
    areacode.org  33412 21799 -35%
    buzzle.com  76279 50134 -34%
    militarycac.com  30014 1977 -34%
    howstuffworks.com  1251213 827093 -34%
    eprize.com  42565 28358 -33%
    travelandleisure.com  110818 74347 -33%
    webutations.info  190251 127762 -33%
    appbrain.com  59235 40254 -32%
    enjoygram.com  28335 19322 -32%
    dailypuppy.com  24775 1701 -31%
    oxforddictionaries.com  383172 265208 -31%
    offers.com  56036 39082 -30%
    guardianlv.com  34268 24045 -30%
    thinkexist.com  138435 97364 -30%
    hallmark.com  61087 4381 -28%
    ehow.com  101928 73157 -28%
    laws.com  26208 18839 -28%
    greenwichmeantime.com  45629 32906 -28%
    miamiherald.com  99912 72274 -28%
    dubbed-scene.com  26502 1926 -27%
    bobdylan.com  27307 19881 -27%
    cardhub.com  49508 36101 -27%
    mommysavesbig.com  46118 33913 -26%
    healthcentral.com  47799 35173 -26%
    appcrawlr.com  29088 21595 -26%

    Winners:

        Domain – Winner     Before     After   Change in %
    comdotgame.com  2632 38231 1353%
    hongkiat.com  135 68372 406%
    babble.com  8963 42916 379%
    rd.com  17209 71434 315%
    mediamass.net  6839 27876 308%
    hotelguides.com  8563 32957 285%
    yourtango.com  30624 109148 256%
    moreofit.com  6431 22864 256%
    celebrity-gossip.net  10727 38068 255%
    spoonful.com  2813 89573 218%
    ivillage.com  11818 37065 214%
    800-numbers.net  11809 34631 193%
    thepiratebay.se  2571 67457 162%
    aceshowbiz.com  21679 55059 154%
    dummies.com  42806 104764 145%
    geekwire.com  11606 28319 144%
    ispot.tv  12242 28062 129%
    womansday.com  11868 27195 129%
    bncollege.com  36738 76969 110%
    afterdawn.com  18519 38775 109%
    allwomenstalk.com  19836 41088 107%
    livescience.com  79499 164323 107%
    savings.com  25874 52886 104%
    fastcodesign.com  25303 50326 99%
    mystore411.com  24262 47482 96%
    health.com  120733 212827 76%
    unblocksit.es  23559 40897 74%
    newseum.org  36201 59205 64%
    netdoctor.co.uk  25973 41246 59%
    celebdirtylaundry.com  34511 53817 56%
    digitaltrends.com  137257 21076 54%
    quickanddirtytips.com  28288 43284 53%
    tvtropes.org  105715 160152 51%
    simplyrecipes.com  100684 149017 48%
    glamour.com  53907 77933 45%
    astrologyzone.com  45185 65237 44%
    chow.com  117933 168931 43%
    arstechnica.com  121742 171708 41%
    parenting.com  49936 70185 41%
    realsimple.com  180553 252922 40%
    webopedia.com  153512 213758 39%
    healthgrades.com  70386 97103 38%
    laptopmag.com  53221 73249 38%
    dispatch.com  44614 60412 35%
    dealcatcher.com  95757 128887 35%
    businessdictionary.com  104606 140213 34%
    vice.com  157693 208496 32%
    smithsonianmag.com  18069 238733 32%
    thefreedictionary.com  2124356 2774647 31%
    internetslang.com  50578 65093 29%

    These lists were also released early in the roll-out, so it’s likely that they’ve changed significantly by now. It’s also worth keeping in mind that these lists have in the past not always been a completely accurate view of sites affected by Panda, as other signals have come into play. It’s an interesting look some sites that have lost and gained search visibility in Google, but strictly speaking about Panda, the lists should be taken with a grain of salt.

    Notice that eHow – the content farm poster child, which has been a major victim of Panda over the years – is in the losers list yet again.

    While you’re dealing with the new Panda update and anticipating the next Penguin, keep in mind that Google is also bumping up HTTPS sites and is apparently adding mobile site usability as a ranking signal. Also, you might want to take another look at that list of Panda-related guidelines Google provided.

    What are your thoughts about the latest Panda so far? A step in the right direction? Let us know in the comments.

    Note: This article has been updated from a previous form to include additional information.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • It Looks Like Google Is Adding Another Ranking Signal

    It Looks Like Google Is Adding Another Ranking Signal

    It looks like Google is going to be taking the mobile user experience of websites into account as a ranking signal in its algorithm It’s actually pretty surprising if they’re not already doing so.

    How much weight should such a signal carry? Should it affect a site’s rankings on the desktop? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Google has been pushing webmasters to make their sites better on mobile devices for quite some time, but now we have a Googler basically hinting at it as a direct signal.

    Barry Schwartz, writing for the Search Marketing Expo’s companion site, Search Engine Land, reports:

    At Search Marketing Expo East, Google engineer, Gary Illyes talked a lot of user experience and that webmasters really need to focus on that. Over the past week or so, I asked Google about this and tried to understand why Google stressed this point so much at the event. Google told me “we’re making a big push to ensure the search results we deliver reflect this principle.”

    That’s not exactly an announcement of a new signal like when Google formally said HTTPS would be a ranking signal, but what else could it mean?

    The report also shares this statement from Google:

    Mobile-friendly websites provide a much better user experience for the mobile users. According to our studies, 61% of users are unlikely to return to a mobile site that they had trouble accessing from their phone. That includes sites that use fonts which are illegible on mobile, or sites where users have to zoom in or pan around excessively. Mobile is a very important area; the mobile device penetration is over 50% in the USA and most users use their device for browsing websites.

    The fact is that sometimes the more relevant content isn’t optimized for Google. SEO just isn’t a priority or even an acknowledgement for a great number of sites on the web, and sometimes those sites have good content.

    One way Google is helping its users with that is to give notifications about when their device doesn’t support elements of certain search results, such as when pages use Flash. In fact, the company just expanded this feature globally.

    “A common annoyance for web users is when websites require browser technologies that are not supported by their device,” said Google’s Keita Oda and Pierre Far. “When users access such pages, they may see nothing but a blank space or miss out a large portion of the page’s contents.”

    Here’s what one of the results may look like:

    “Fortunately, making websites that work on all modern devices is not that hard: websites can use HTML5 since it is universally supported, sometimes exclusively, by all devices,” the Googlers said. “To help webmasters build websites that work on all types of devices regardless of the type of content they wish to serve, we recently announced two resources: Web Fundamentals (a curated source for modern best practices); and Web Starter Kit (a starter framework supporting the Web Fundamentals best practices out of the box).”

    Google has also been notifying webmasters about faulty redirects, trying to save users from tapping on a search result only to be redirected to the site’s mobile homepage.

    You can find Web Fundamentals here. On the site it’s described as a comprehensive resource for multi-device web development. It includes sections on multi-device tools, multi-device layouts, forms and user input, images/audio/video, optimising performance, and device access.

    Web Starter Kit is here. From the site, you can download the beta kit, which includes a responsive boilerplate, a style guide, cross-device sync, live browser reloading, performance optimization, a built-in HTTP server, PageSpeed Insights reporting, and Sass support.

    Google also notes that you should not block crawling of any Googlebot of CSS, JavaScript or images with robots.txt or otherwise.

    Meanwhile, Google has for the last couple years been improving its crawling capabilities for smartphone content.

    Would you be happy to see Google take mobile user experience into account for ranking purposes? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via Google

  • Google Is Not Going To Be Updating Toolbar PageRank Anymore

    It looks like Google Toolbar PageRank may officially be a thing of the past. This will no doubt please some, while upsetting others, but for better or worse, don’t expect it to be updated anymore.

    Do you think Toolbar PageRank should die, or do you still find a use for it? Let us know in the comments.

    Over the last couple of years, Google has already been updating PageRank less frequently. In fact, it’s not even been updated this year at all. The last update came in December.

    Even before that, Google had given indication that it wouldn’t update it before the end of last year, if at all, though it ultimately did. By that point, many had assumed Toolbar PageRank was going away because it had been so long since the previous update after years of regularity. Before the December update, it hadn’t been updated since the prior February. Historically, they had updated it every three or four months.

    Google’s Matt Cutts tweeted a year ago that he would be surprised if there was another PR update before 2014. Well, there was, but that was the last one. It’s now been ten months.

    Google’s John Mueller actually addressed the lack of an update in a Google+ Hangout (via Search Engine Roundtable).

    PageRank is something that we haven’t updated for I think over a year now, and we’re probably not going to be updating it going forward, at least in the Toolbar PageRank…

    He said that at 20 minutes and 30 seconds into this video.

    Of course Mueller is incorrect in that it’s been over a year, but he seems to be under the impression that Toolbar PageRank is dead. He wasn’t exactly making an announcement, but discussing it in relation to somebody’s question about a particular site’s rankings, so it’s probably not out of the realm of possibility that an another update could sneak through, but it sounds like it’s not going to happen.

    A year ago, Cutts discussed PageRank in this video:

    “Over time, the Toolbar PageRank is getting less usage just because recent versions of Internet Explorer don’t really let you install toolbars as easily, and Chrome doesn’t have the toolbar so over time, the PageRank indicator will probably start to go away a little bit,” he said.

    In another video earlier in the year, he said, “Maybe it will go away on its own or eventually we’ll reach the point where we say, ‘Okay, maintaining this is not worth the amount of work.’”

    So the writing has been on the wall for quite some time. Still, people have continued to monitor PageRank, and look forward to seeing that data refreshed.

    The last update was actually kind of a side effect of sorts. As Cutts noted at the time, the team was fixing a different backend service, and did a PR update along the way. He said it wasn’t an accident, but that it was just easier for them to push the new PR data rather than keeping the old data. Maybe that will happen again.

    Do you want to see Google continue to update Toolbar PageRank? Let us know in the comments.

  • A Lot Of First-Page Google Results Are Using HTTPS

    Two months ago, Google announced that HTTPS is now a ranking signal used in its algorithm. The company had been pushing the use of HTTPS (HTTP over TLS/Transport Layer Security) for quite some time, and called for “HTTPS everywhere” at Google I/O earlier in the summer.

    This week at SMX East Google indicated that 30% of first-page search results have HTTPS URL, which seems to say a lot. Barry Schwartz at SMX sister site Search Engine Land reports:

    Gary [Illyes] explained that while only 10% of the crawled and discovered URLs on the web are HTTPS URLs, that 30% of the first page search results contain at least one or more HTTPS URLs. So if you are looking at all the queries done on Google, 30% of the first page of the Google search results for each of those queries have at least one HTTPS URL listed in the results.

    He didn’t know why that was the case but he said it was indeed something Google noticed and wanted to share.

    Google said when it announced the ranking signal that it would be a “very lightweight signal” at least for the time being. The company noted that it would carry less weight than other signals like high-quality content. Over time, however, it said it may strengthen that signal. It’s unclear if it’s already been strengthened at all since then, but it seems a little early to have done so.

    It will be interesting to see if we get any updates on the URL percentage for first-page results from Google in the future.

    Meanwhile, Bing has apparently been mocking Google’s use of HTTPS as a ranking signal, saying they’d rather give users content they want.

    Image via Google