WebProNews

Tag: SEO

  • Google Says You Should Avoid Link Building

    Google Says You Should Avoid Link Building

    You know how you’ve been building links to your website for years, trying to get Google look upon it more favorably? Well, according to Google, you shouldn’t bother doing that.

    Do you think there’s still value to link building? Let us know in the comments.

    Nearly an hour into a Google Webmaster Central Office Hours hangout on Friday, Google’s John Mueller was asked whether or not link building, in any way, is good for webmasters.

    Mueller’s response (via Search Engine Roundtable) was, “That is a good question. In general, I’d try to avoid that. So that you are really sure that your content kind of stands on its own and make it possible for other people of course to link to your content. Make it easy, maybe, put a little widget on your page, if you like this, this is how you can link to it. Make sure that the URLs on your web site are easy to copy and paste. All of those things make it a little bit easier. We do use links as part of our algorithms but we use lots and lots of other factors as well. So only focusing on links is probably going to cause more problems for your web site that actually helps.” Emphasis added.

    This part starts at about 55:40 into the following video:

    We reached out to online marketer Ken McGaffin, who is widely known for his quality link building services, to get his thoughts on what Mueller said. We’ll just give you McGaffin’s words verbatim:

    That all depends on the type of link building you’re doing. Let’s say I’ve just conducted a great piece of research for a client and my prime objective is to get them media coverage. The research and the accompanying press release was so good that it got coverage in the NYTimes, BBC and many others – good job done!

    But my secondary objective is to get links – so AS WELL as conducting the research, and writing the press release, I make sure that the journalist has something to link to, something that his readers will appreciate. That could be:

    – an in-depth blog post giving much more detail than the Journalist could give space to
    – a presentation or infographic of the results
    – a copy of the original research so that readers can check it out.

    In this case, I’m doing my client a service in getting PR coverage. But I’m also doing my best to ensure that editorial links and others links will follow. I can only see Google looking positively on my efforts – because of the value it offers. But if all I did was the ‘link building’ part then I’d be doing my client a disservice – and missing some major opportunities. This means that any online marketing/PR initiative is multi-layered – and one of those layers must be link building.

    Well said.

    There’s no question that link building strategies have had to adapt to the changing search engine climate over the years. We recently had a great conversation with Eric Ward (another prominent name in link building) about that.

    “Many people feel the very act of pursuing links has become evil, which is sad because it’s not even close to true. In 1994 nobody gave any thought to the idea that a link to a website could be a bad thing,” he told us. “The entire concept of a poisoned link profile is simultaneously comic and tragic. Links are not ‘things’. Links are not imbued with the quality of Good or Evil. Links are the visible manifestation of a human’s action and opinion, and in some cases, intent.”

    “I guess if I had to boil down the biggest change of all from a strategy standpoint it would be in trying to help people realize that it is incredibly easy compared to the old days to get URLs to migrate or propagate across the web,” he said. “What I mean by that is today everyone is a Link builder, they just don’t see themselves that way, and many linking strategists overlook this.”

    If you really want to dig into how linking and link building has changed over the years, I suggest the rest of our conversation.

    How has your linking strategy changed over the years? Please discuss in the comments.

  • What Google’s Twitter Deal Means For You

    What Google’s Twitter Deal Means For You

    News came out last week that Google and Twitter have struck a new deal to put real-time tweets back into Google’s search index. The companies aren’t providing much in the way of details about the deal at this point, and it’s possible that they never will, but they did confirm the deal, and indicate that it will go into effect in a few months.

    Do you expect to benefit from the deal? Tell us what you think about it in the comments.

    Years ago, when the two companies had a similar relationship, Google had a search feature called Realtime Search, which displayed a set of scrolling results at the top of the search results page on some queries (typically newsy ones). The feature didn’t rely solely on Twitter. It incorporated other sources, but it was clear that Twitter was the one that really mattered, especially when the whole feature went away upon the expiration of the companies’ initial deal.

    Ever since that fell apart, Google has been lacking in the real-time department. In the early days of Google+, it seemed like Google thought it might be able to replace Twitter with its own real-time content, but obviously that never materialized to the extent of what Twitter has to offer. Meanwhile, Google would continue to index tweets in its regular search results, but it would never be able to index them in real time, and the ones it did index would only be a small percentage of the larger tweet pool.

    Eric Enge’s Stone Temple Consulting released some new findings about how Google indexes tweets currently, which provides some insight into how things may change when the new deal goes into effect. His team analyzed over 133,000 tweets to see how Google indexed them, and found that about 7.4% of them were actually indexed, leaving 92.6% completely left out of the search engine.

    That tells us a great deal right there. Google’s mission is to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” As we’ve discussed in the past, Google is essentially failing that mission without Twitter’s firehose. Today, the world’s information is coming at us in extremely rapid fashion, and as far as public information goes (Facebook is working to do more with the non-public stuff), Twitter is the best provider of that rapid-fire info. How can Google possibly succeed in its stated mission if it’s only organizing a little over 7% of that information?

    Stone Temple’s findings suggest that Twitter accounts with larger follower counts are getting more tweets indexed, though it may be only a correlation. Enge says he doesn’t think Google is looking specifically at follower count, but that other signals are affecting which profiles get indexed more (i.e. links to those accounts’ profiles). Either way, he notes, more value is clearly being placed on the authoritative accounts.

    Out of the accounts with over a million followers that the research looks at, there were 13,435 tweets with 21% of them being indexed by Google. Out of 44,318 tweets in the 10K to 1M follower range, only 10% were indexed. For 80,842 tweets from accounts with less than 10,000 followers, just 4% were indexed.

    Stone Temple says images and/or hashtags seem to increase a tweet’s chances of getting indexed with percentages registering higher than average. Mentions, on the other hand, register negatively. It also points to another of its studies, which showed that links from third-party sites have a significant impact.

    “Google still loves links. 26% of the tweets with an inbound link from sites other than Twitter got indexed. That is nearly 4 times as much as the overall average rate of indexation,” Enge says in the report, adding that link quantity correlates highly with a tweet getting indexed.

    They found that out of 21 accounts and 91 tweets with with over 100 inbound links, 46% were indexed. The number goes down the less inbound links there are. Those with less than ten links only saw a 7% index rate.

    Be sure to check out the research for additional findings.

    Following the release of this research, we did a Q&A with Enge:

    Do you think Google will re-implement the kind of real-time scrolling results feature at the top of search results like it used to have with its old Twitter deal?

    Enge: Not really, I don’t think that this is what Google is looking for. I suspect that the UI impact will be minimal, but that more tweets will get indexed. However (and this is a big however), what will really be interesting to see is if Google uses tweet data to help drive personalization in one fashion or another. One simple way to do this? Simply favor content that people link to from their tweets in future related search results.

    This type of prioritization is similar to what they do with Google+ already. This is just speculation on my part, but I think it could be a huge win for Google if this deal gives them enough visibility to allow them to do that.

    Under the deal, do you think we’ll see a lot more brand new tweets appearing HIGH in search results? Do you expect the freshness of a tweet to be heavily factored into Google’s ranking signals when indexing tweets?

    Enge: Great question. What our study showed is that Google currently places minimal impact on freshness of tweets today. Perhaps when crawling needs to be done to discover them it’s just not worth it, and it might be that the new deal will change that. However, I suspect that it’s not the tweets themselves that Google really values the most, but the content they link to that Google wants to discover more quickly. That said, if they see a tweet getting major engagement, chances probably would go up that this tweet will show up higher in the results.

    The study suggests that tweets with images and/or hashtags have a better shot at getting indexed, and those with mentions have less of a shot. It’s acknowledged that this may or may not be simply a correlation. What does your gut tell you?

    Enge: I think it’s real. Bear in mind that the study we published in December on Twitter engagement also shows that images and hashtags have a positive impact on user engagement. This means that people see them as more valuable, and Google wants to place more value on the content that users value the most. So, my gut tells me that this is actually a causal situation, not just a correlation.

    When the study is talking about the impact of 3rd party sites linking to tweets as something Google likes, are we talking primarily about tweets that are being embedded on these sites, just plain old links, or a combination of the two?

    Enge: As you may know, there are many sites out there that simply replicate lots of tweets on their sites. I am not sure what value they serve, or if any people actually visit such sites. But, some of the links tweets get come from such sites, and my bet is that Google ignores those.

    However, there are other sites that may reference tweets within a blog post or article, and link in a clean traditional web link based fashion to the URL for the tweet itself (what you referred to as “plain old links”). It is these links that I believe that Google is placing a high value on.

    How do you expect Google to react to promoted tweets? Let’s say Google indexes your tweet when it’s organic, but then you decide to promote it? At that point, Google is basically indexing an ad. Will Google shy away from indexing promoted tweets altogether?

    Enge: If a promoted tweet gets a ton of engagement, as well as external links, I think that it might still get indexed and rank, but I’d expect that the threshold will be higher than it is for organic tweets. I don’t have any science for that answer, but it is my sense as to how they will treat it.

    Your site uses “tweetable quotes” throughout its content. Has this been particularly effective for increasing Twitter traffic? Have you measured this specifically or are you familiar with any studies that have?

    Enge: Mark Traphagen pushed us into doing this, and makes sure all of our posts include these. He also tracks it very closely. Within 5 hours of the Twitter indexing study going live today, 67 people have already used the click to tweet boxes to generate tweets, and this has driven 207 unique clicks to the article. Pretty valuable I’d say!

    Would you recommend sites use this more in light of the Google deal?

    Enge: Yes! People do respond to the click to tweet boxes and that helps us get more tweet-love for our articles, and more visits. We use ClickToTweet.com for this, but there are other good services out there. Note that to make this look nice, Mark figured out a process to take the ClickToTweet link and embed it in an image as well.

    All great stuff to know. Enge gives us some incredibly valuable insight as usual. Again, don’t forget to check out Stone Temple’s study.

    Are you looking forward to seeing Google indexing Tweets in real time again? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via StoneTemple.com

  • Site Takes Google Pounding, Reduces Staff

    Site Takes Google Pounding, Reduces Staff

    Google updates can have devastating effects on websites that depend on traffic from the search engine to thrive. It’s become clear over the years that it’s not wise to depend on Google or any other one source of traffic, because that source can go away in the blink of an eye, and then you’re stuck with some major problems. We’ve seen it happen time and time again, particularly since Google first launched the Panda update four years ago.

    Businesses have to find ways to Google proof (not to mention Facebook proof) their sites if they want to survive in the long run. Tell us and other readers about some steps you’ve taken to do so.

    It’s not only algorithm updates that can potentially impede the flow of traffic. As you know, Google has been providing more and more content directly on its search results pages, reducing the need for users to click over to third-party websites.

    As reported in December, Google seemingly killed a whole category of websites in one fell swoop when it started showing lyrics to songs in search results, preventing users from having to click through to lyrics sites to obtain the words they’re looking for. While Google doesn’t do this on every song lyric query, it does for many, and I’d assume the number will only grow.

    Not only is Google showing lyrics on the search results pages, on some of them, it’s only showing part of the lyrics, and putting a link to Google Play where users can click to see the rest on Google’s own site.

    Last month, it was no surprise to see that lyrics sites had in fact been drastically hurt in search visibility. SearchMetrics put out a list of the top “falling stars” of 2014 in terms of search visibility, and various lyrics sites made the list. LyricsMode and Sing365 each fell 60%. LyricsFreak dropped 59%. MetroLyrics dropped 12%. Last.fm, which links to MetroLyrics for song lyrics saw a decline of 18%. The star that fell the hardest, however (outside of a couple sites that registered big drops from redirects), was eLyrics.net, which saw a 92% drop. To recap, here’s the full list:

    Domain Loss in % Category
    guardian.co.uk -100 *Redirected
    mayoclinic.com -97 *Redirected
    elyrics.net -92 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    patch.com -72 Web Portal
    lyricsmode.com -60 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    sing365.com -60 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    lyricsfreak.com -59 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    tvtropes.org -59 News/Video
    discovery.com -59 News/Video
    starpulse.com -57 News/Video
    thefreedictionary.com -54 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    topix.com -49 Social/Portal
    thesaurus.com -48 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    nndb.com -45 Info
    netflix.com -45 News/Video
    myspace.com -40 Social/Portal
    aol.com -39 Internet/Computer/Tech
    flickr.com -39 Social/Portal
    chicagotribune.com -37 News/Video
    nbcnews.com -36 News/Video
    funnyordie.com -35 Social/Portal
    answers.com -35 Q&A/Expert
    examiner.com -35 News/Video
    alexa.com -34 Info
    simplyrecipes.com -32 Social/Portal
    tumblr.com -31 Social/Portal
    ask.com -30 Internet/Computer/Tech
    askmen.com -28 Blog
    indeed.com -27 Classif
    zap2it.com -27 News/Video
    zazzle.com -27 Retail
    expedia.com -27 Travel
    moviefone.com -26 News/Video
    blogspot.com -26 Blog
    foxnews.com -24 News/Video
    dailymotion.com -23 News/Video
    photobucket.com -23 Social/Portal
    toptenreviews.com -22 Price/Classif
    wikitravel.org -22 Travel
    food.com -21 Cooking
    msn.com -21 News/Video
    howstuffworks.com -21 Q&A/Expert
    mashable.com -21 Blog
    enchantedlearning.com -21 Q&A/Expert
    cbsnews.com -21 News/Video
    usatoday.com -20 News/Video
    latimes.com -20 News/Video
    nba.com -18 Info
    last.fm -18 Social/Portal
    rapgenius.com -17 *Redirected
    gethuman.com -16 Info
    crunchbase.com -16 Info
    nydailynews.com -15 News/Video
    nytimes.com -15 News/Video
    city-data.com -14 Adress
    cnn.com -13 News/Video
    huffingtonpost.com -13 News/Video
    nationalgeographic.com -12 News/Video
    whitepages.com -12 Adress
    metrolyrics.com -12 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    medicalnewstoday.com -11 Med
    retailmenot.com -11 Price/Classif
    perezhilton.com -10 Blog

    eLyrics.net confirmed the drop as reported by SearchMetrics to WebProNews, calling it “unfortunately true.”

    Interestingly enough, the site does not attribute the drop in traffic specifically to Google showing lyrics on its search results pages, but rather to both Panda and Penguin.

    eLyrics says it has not seen any drop off from other search engines, and that they’re “pretty much the same”.

    Asked if the site will be able to survive without search traffic, eLyrics said, “I doubt that, but we are pushing hard to stay online.”

    Asked if it has other significant sources of traffic, the site says it has very little direct traffic and social shares. Still, it says it’s not going to change anything just because of Google’s changes, but will “try to operate as usual.”

    We’ve seen Google changes lead to websites shutting down and businesses laying off staff in the past. Asked if the site has any employees, and if the change will affect that, eLyrics said it has already decreased its number of staff.

    We reached out to other lyrics sites from SearchMetrics’ list, but eLyrics was the only one we received comment from. While I’m not at all surprised to hear that eLyrics was impacted by Panda and/or Penguin (it wouldn’t be the first time such a site was impacted), I am somewhat surprised to hear that Google’s addition of lyrics on search results pages hasn’t contributed. Perhaps that just came too late to matter.

    Either way, other site should use this as the latest example in the ongoing lesson about not depending solely on Google for visitors. Build your audience through other channels, and diversify your traffic as much as possible. You will never be guaranteed ongoing success through any single path.

    What advice would you give to a site like eLyrics? Share in the comments.

    Images via eLyrics, Google

  • Google ‘Update’ Impacts E-Commerce Sites

    Google ‘Update’ Impacts E-Commerce Sites

    Google makes adjustments to its search algorithms every day, but sometime last week, it made one that was bigger than the average tweak, and a lot of webmasters took notice.

    The comments about ranking changes poured into the search forums and other channels, but Google didn’t indicate it had launched a major update like it sometimes does. You can browse through over 50 messages from webmasters beginning on February 2 here.

    SEO forum watcher Barry Schwartz took note as usual and pulled together some charts showing some significant pattern changes at the turn of the month. He asked Google about it and was told that the activity was not related to Panda or Penguin, and got this vague statement from the search giant:

    Thanks for checking in — as usual, we’re continuing to make tweaks, but we don’t have a specific “update” to announce.

    A lot of people suggested that the tweak was related to mobile, but that’s still up in the air. On Sunday, SearchMetrics shared some findings, including that e-commerce sites appear to have been affected, and that this may or may not be related to the the mobile changes webmasters have been noticing. Both developments, it said, seem to not be completely rolled out yet. They also noticed that some sites that initially lost rankings got them back.

    “This development is mostly concentrated on e-commerce and keywords with measurable CPC,” writes Searchmetrics founder Marcus Tober. “Affected sites are mostly retailers, shops, price comparison etc., but of course not limited to that. We noticed two things: first, a loss of a few positions (affected most “loser keywords”), and secondly a total kick-out from the top 100 (affected a small amount of rankings). The pattern is dominated by losing just a few rankings, which of course is reflected in traffic losses.”

    “One interesting observation we made was for search results for brand keywords with typos, like ‘addidas’ or ‘adiddas’,” he says. “Before the recent change, mostly price comparison sites, shops and small ad sites ranked here. Then Google started to treat the keywords equally as brands. “As usual” the brand ranked on position 1 with Wikipedia right behind – which represents the typical search results for a brand. Now the SERPs look brand new.”

    Searchmetrics also found that for correct brand searches, some smaller providers saw gains while some bigger ones dropped. Check out Tober’s post for additional analysis, but remember it’s still early on this one to come away with any real tangible takeaways.

    In terms of mobile, Google has been largely expected to roll out a new mobile ranking signal.

    Image via Google

  • Google Shows Call-To-Action Links For Quick Answer Results From Third-Party Sites

    Google Shows Call-To-Action Links For Quick Answer Results From Third-Party Sites

    Back in November, people started noticing that Google was showing call-to-action link for some of its quick answer results. The only examples anyone produced at the time came from Google’s own pages.

    For example, “adwords negative keywords” showed some info drawn from a Google support page, and included a link to “Show me how.”

    Another example was for the query “open gmail account,” which did the same thing, but included a link saying “Go to Account Creation”.

    Most queries in which Google pulls info from a third-party site simply include more generic source links:

    Now, as Search Engine Land points out, Google is showing the call-to-action style links for some third-party sites. For example, search “quickbooks install,” and you’ll see a WordPress answer box with a link that says, “Go to download.”

    A query for “wordpress download” presents a similar result. As SEL also notes, a query for “love quotes” also brings up a similar answer box with a call-to-action link “Try Again.” Hitting that will simply bring up another quote.

    It’s still unclear how and when Google decides to show call-to-action links for these types of results. Perhaps at some point they’ll give webmasters the ability to tell them what they want to appear for their content.

    Google recently asked webmasters what kinds of things they’d like to see added to Webmaster Tools in 2015. So far, 976 people have submitted 319 suggestions and cast 5,509 votes.

    Images via Google

  • How Ranking Works In Pinterest’s Guided Search

    How Ranking Works In Pinterest’s Guided Search

    Pinterest launched Guided Search last April as a new way to help users discover content with some nudging in the right direction. It’s basically Pinterest’s way of suggesting search refinements as you browse. For example, if you search for “pasta,” you might be presented with options like: recipes, dishes, salad, packaging, one pot, shrimp, sauce, chicken, etc. If you click sauce, for example, you’ll get results that are pasta sauce-based, but also a new set of guides, such as: homemade, recipes, with fresh tomatoes, olive oil, healthy, easy, creamy, etc. And so on, and so on.

    “Guided Search helps Pinners refine and discover more relevant results for the answers that differ from person to person,” a spokesperson for Pinterest tells WebProNews. “As we build a discovery engine, searching is a key way for Pinners to find and save ideas Pinned by others. Searches derived from clicking on guides is one of the major sources of our search traffic, with guide clicking up 3x over the last 6 months.”

    Guided Search Ranking Factors

    Pinterest is now sharing some information about how guides for Guided Search are generated and ranked. Again, this is guides, not pins. They use the following signals: interests to guides, quality of results of composed queries, location, gender, current trend, and spam detection.

    Interests to guides looks at how users click each guide of a query. The more interest the user shows in a guide, the higher that guide is ranked. Quality of results of composed queries refers to how confident Pinterest is with the search results after the user clicks a guide. Confidence is calculated based on how users click the result pins and how often they add them to their boards. It also takes into account the quality of third-party web pages that the result pins link to. The more users like the results of a particular guide, the higher the guide ranks.

    Location is pretty self-explanatory, but it’s effective. Pinterest started using it as a ranking signal last month, and says it has seen a 5% to 10% increase in guide clicks in some countries as a result. Guide location scores factor in how much interest users from various countries show in each guide.

    Here’s a look at the same query in both the U.S. and U.K.

    “In general, male Pinners have different interests in guides than females, and so we rank guides differently based on what’s trending for each group. Gender scores are orthogonal to location scores in ranking. For example, male users in Mexico see guides ranked specifically for their demographic,” says Pinterest software engineer Kevin Ma. “We built a time sensitive scoring function to detect the current trend of users’ interests in guides. This function applies a recency boost to guides that have a momentum in ranking. If a large number of Pinners are interested in a guide in a short amount of time, this guide becomes a popular guide. Popular guides can be boosted to a higher rank for days. Once they lose their momentum, meaning less people are engaged to this guide, the function quickly ranks the guide to a later position.”

    The spam detection signal just means Pinterest removes any spammy Pins it finds from guide ranking.

    How People Are Using Guided Search

    On average, Pinners click 3.6 guides daily when using Guided Search, Pinterest says. Interestingly, men are more likely than women to click guides, and often do so on topics related to Art, Cars, Fitness, Health, Men’s Fashion, Outdoors and Shopping. This is good news for Pinterest, which recently shared some other stats about how it’s growing its male user base, which grew 73% year-over-year in the U.S.

    Pinterest also recently announced additional search improvements aimed at better targeting of search results based on gender.

    “We’ve already seen these improvements result in a double digit lift in engagement, similar to recent updates to the new user experience which show trending interests for each gender to choose from as they get started,” Pinterest told us.

    Women Pinners apparently use guides most when they’re searching in categories like Food and Drink, Home Decor and Technology.

    Pinterest says users outside of the U.S. use guides more often than U.S. users, with the highest click rate occurring in Mexico. Pinners in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines and the U.K. are also more likely to click a search guide than those in the U.S., according to the company.

    The company says fitness-related searches also get some of the highest click-throughs of guides.

    “Guided Search launched on mobile first and was designed with a small screen in mind and optimized for tapping instead of typing, so it’s no surprise guides are clicked more often on mobile than web,” the spokesperson says. “Pinners on iPhone are 50% more likely to click a guide than those on web.”

    Pinterest finds that users are more likely to click guides during weekend rather than weekdays.

    Guided Search Helps Pinterest Understand Intent

    PInterest revealed earlier this month that since adding Guided Search, the average number of searches per person grew by 25%. At the time, the company explained that it’s getting better at understanding search queries. For example, with guides in action, it learns more about intent, and can better deliver on something like turkey recipes vs. Turkey the country.

    “The more people search, the better we can suggest results,” wrote Pinterest software engineer Dong Wang. “From the previous example, we can guess that the next person who issues the query ‘turkey’ may also be interested in the ‘turkey recipes.’ The information extracted from previous query log has shown to be effective in understanding the user’s search intent. Search context such as adjacent queries in the same search session and clicked Pins after submitting a search query can help us improve the discovery experience for future searches. To capture the information about a search query and make it available for other applications to process, derive signals and build features on top of it, we designed a data collection called QueryJoin.”

    QueryJoin contains the search query (which is its identifier), demographic stats (gender, country, language), adjacent queries, and pins. Each pin comes with aggregated data from “PinJoin,” which is a data collection of a cluster of pins with the same image signature and info). It also looks at engagement stats like number of clicks, repins, and likes. More on QueryJoin here and PinJoin here.

    “Guides change based on engagement, so the more people search and pin, the better the experience gets,” says Ma. Check out his blog post on the Pinterest engineering blog for a deeper dive into how guides are created on the back end.

    What Does Guided Search Mean for You?

    Pinterest obviously offers websites some traffic opportunities. According to Shareaholic, it’s the second biggest driver of social media traffic referrals behind Facebook.

    In a recent article, we looked at some ways you can optimize your own content and pins for better performance in PInterest search. This includes tips directly from Pinterest, as well as some insight from an ebook written by Pinterest marketer Vincent Ng. In short, you need to optimize your pins as well as your website for Pinterest sharing.

    We also interviewed Ng about how businesses can get more out of their PInterest marketing efforts. Among other things, he talked about Guided Search.

    “Guided Search allows for businesses and marketers to see what other topics or products people may be interested in,” he said. “For example, you may be in the business of selling wedding dresses, but you’re not too sure what dresses are popular. When you use Guided Search, it tells us that people are looking for princess wedding dresses, vintage wedding dresses, and lace wedding dresses and so much more. Now you can create boards and pins around those specific topics and keywords. You don’t have to guess what people want. Guided Search will tell you what people want.”

    Pinterest says it will continue to work on making Guided Search more personal and localized with additional updates planned for throughout the year.

    Image via Pinterest, Shareaholic

  • Google Adds Crawling, Indexing Of Locale-Adaptive Pages

    Google Adds Crawling, Indexing Of Locale-Adaptive Pages

    Google announced that it’s introducing new locale-aware crawl configurations for Googlebot for pages it detects may adapt their content based on the request’s language and perceived location.

    “Locale-adaptive pages change their content to reflect the user’s language or perceived geographic location,” Google says in a blog post. Since, by default, Googlebot requests pages without setting an Accept-Language HTTP request header and uses IP addresses that appear to be located in the USA, not all content variants of locale-adaptive pages may be indexed completely.”

    The new configurations are geo-distributed crawling and language-dependent crawling. The former sees Googlebot starting to use IP addresses that appear to come from outside of the U.S. as well as the current IP addresses that appear to be from the U.S. that Googlebot already uses. The latter is where Googlebot crawls with an Accept-Language HTTP header in the request.

    The new configurations are enabled automatically for pages Google detects to be locale-adaptive, and the company warns you may notice changes in how it crawls and shows your site in search results even if you haven’t changed your CMS or server settings.

    Google supports and recommends using separate locale URLconfigurations and annotating them with rel=”alternate hreflang annotations. It considers using separate URLs the best way for users to interact and share your content, while maximizing indexing and better ranking your content.

    More on locale-aware crawling by Googlebot here.

    Image via Google

  • Pinterest Marketing Tips From A Guy That’s Been Doing It For 5 Years

    Pinterest Marketing Tips From A Guy That’s Been Doing It For 5 Years

    Pinterest may have plateaued as a driver of traffic to websites, at least for the time being, but it’s still number two in that department behind Facebook, according to data from Shareaholic. The firm released a report this week finding that Twitter, StumbleUpon, reddit, Google+, LinkedIn, and YouTube combined represent roughly a third of the traffic Pinterest sent to publishers in December.

    pinterst referrals

    If you want to get web traffic from Pinterest, you’re going to want to optimize for the Pinterest search experience.

    Is Pinterest search optimization part of your online marketing strategy? Do you intend to focus more on it going forward? Let us know in the comments.

    We recently looked at some ways you can do that. In that article, we referenced an eBook on the subject written by Vincent Ng, a marketer who has been engaging in Pinterest marketing since 2010, and runs a Pinterest marketing agency.

    Ng, who goes specifically by “Pinterest marketer” as opposed to online marketing consultant or something like that, has now shared some additional insights into Pinterest search and marketing with WebProNews.

    How has Guided Search changed Pinterest marketing?

    Last year, Pinterest launched Guided Search, an enhanced version of its search feature enabling users to find things they didn’t necessarily know they were looking for. You can start with a relatively vague keyword, and get additional options to add to help “guide” you in different directions.

    pinterest marketer Vincent Ng“Guided Search allows for businesses and marketers to see what other topics or products people may be interested in,” Ng tells us. “For example, you may be in the business of selling wedding dresses, but you’re not too sure what dresses are popular. When you use Guided Search, it tells us that people are looking for princess wedding dresses, vintage wedding dresses, and lace wedding dresses and so much more. Now you can create boards and pins around those specific topics and keywords.”

    “You don’t have to guess what people want,” he adds. “Guided Search will tell you what people want.”

    Pinterest Analytics

    Last summer, Pinterest made its “new and improved” analytics offering generally available. The company described it as a “smarter tool to help businesses worldwide continue to improve how they work, with meaningful insights about what their customers are interested in.”

    The company recently made a new video primer available:

    “There’s a lot going on with Pinterest analytics,” Ng says. “The first thing is to ensure you have verified your Pinterest account with your associated website. You will know it’s verified once there’s a red check mark next to your website. A verified Pinterest account gets you analytics of pins that are coming directly from your site as well as pins that direct back to your site.”

    “The area known as, Activity on (your website), will give you data on which pins are getting the most repins, the most clicks and the most impressions. And this is a great starting point to know how what pins are most engaging,” he adds. “And what’s great about that data, is that it shows you pins from other people as well. The best performing pins are not always going to be the one that you originally pinned. It could be from one that’s been reshared onto an influencer’s account. And if it is, you may want to contact that person and send them a thank you note or special offer if she happens to have pinned one of your products.”

    How Can Using Rich Pins Help Bloggers Drive Traffic?

    Pinterest, as you may or may not know, offers something called Rich Pins. There are several types: Product, Recipe, Article, Movie, and Place. These allow you to make pins more useful, and add relevant information. For example, article pins include a headline, the author, and a story description.

    “Rich pins for a blogger is a must, because rich pins are a factor in search rankings for Pinterest. Pinterest prefers to show blog posts or pins that are rich pins,” says Ng. “On top of that, rich pins also have more credibility and authority because rich pins for articles show off, in bold text, the title of the blog post article and the meta description when clicked through.”

    “I worked with a hairstyle blog on improving their traffic, and we were stuck at getting 30 referral visits a day from Pinterest,” he adds. “The moment they were approved for rich pins, the traffic spiked up within two days to 70 referral visits from Pinterest.”

    Making Your Site More Pinterest-Friendly

    There are things you can do besides using the Pin It button and rich pins to make your site more Pinterest-friendly.

    “One of the ways is to ensure that you have a vertical image that people can pin,” says Ng. “This is because vertical images stand out more on Pinterest’s feed. A person who does a really good job of creating blog images is Donna Mortize from Socially Sorted.”

    “The other way to make content Pinterest friendly is to use more than one pinnable image,” he adds. “Just like the idea of a click to tweet, when you create snackable content that’s pin friendly and you have two or three of those spread out in a blog post, then readers can choose the one that resonates with them the best that they want to pin.”

    The Messaging Feature

    Last year, Pinterest launched a new messaging feature allowing users to reply to people when they shoot them a pin. You can reply back with text or with another pin. You can even send pins and messages to multiple people at once.

    “For marketers, it’s a great way to contact some of your most influential followers and engagers and begin a relationship,” says Ng. “As long as a person follows you, you can contact him.”

    “If you happen to sell a product then send your fans a link for a discount,” he says. “As a blogger myself, I’ve sent messages thanking people for being gracious in pinning my content. But I also ask for their e-mail in Pinterest messages. After that I will then send them a free copy of my e-book that would cost close to $25, free of charge, because they were such great fans.”

    Interest Following

    Pinterest also launched interest following last year. Marketers may find some opportunities here as well.

    “There are some steps you can take to increase your chances of your pins showing up within interests on Pinterest,” says Ng. “First, try to ensure that your boards are in the correct category of the interest. For example, if you happen to sell comic books, then your best category would be geek. Second, in the pin descriptions, use the search terms that are the exact match of the interest, and/or ensure you use words associated with that interest. If the interest is Marvel Comics, then use words like Spiderman and Mary Jane, as long as it’s relevant.”

    “Another aspect that will help is to look at the images that are being used in interests, and see if there is a pattern,” he adds. “Pinterest’s visual recognition isn’t perfect, but it is getting better at putting the right pins in the right interests based on the image itself.”

    Does Time of Day/Week Matter?

    Asked if he believes if there are times of the day and/or week that are better for pinning content than others, Ng says, “I do and I don’t. And that’s because every business is going to be different and every customer is going to use it at different times. For example, you may want to post in the evening and weekend if you’re selling women’s fashion. However if you’re a blogger that’s focused on stay at home business moms, then you may want to pin early in the morning when mothers are getting up.”

    “The challenge is that not all pins show up at the moment you pin,” he says. “It could be hours, or even days before someone is exposed to it due to the new Pinterest smart feed changes.”

    What Does Pinterest need?

    Asked if there’s one feature that he’d like to see Pinterest add that it doesn’t already have, Ng says, “I think it would be great if Pinterest added a sticky pin feature. If Pinterest allowed you to keep one pin at the first position when a board is clicked on, that would be amazing.”

    More Men Are Coming Around To Pinterest

    Pinterest’s latest search-related announcement was the addition of gender-based filtering, enabling men to have a better search experience on the service, which has a reputation for being much more woman-oriented.

    “I think the new search feature that customizes results based on whether you’re a woman or a man will be good in terms of driving more men to use the site,” Ng says. “Before, when men searched for pins on Pinterest they were getting a lot of irrelevant pins.”

    “For example if you typed in watches, if you were a man, you would get a lot of watches that were for women,” he adds. “But now as a man, when you type in watches in the search box on Pinterest you get watches that are designed for men. And that’s a great way to encourage more men to use it, and to help male/female products be exposed more to the right audience.”

    A Pinterest spokesperson tells us, “We’ve already seen these improvements result in a double digit lift in engagement, similar to recent updates to the new user experience which show trending interests for each gender to choose from as they get started.”

    They also shared some new growth stats with us. For one, Pinterest’s male user base in the U.S. grew 73% year-over-year.

    Suffice it to say, the second leading driver of social media referral traffic is growing its audience and improving its search functionality. This is good for websites.

    Do you get significant traffic from Pinterest? Is this an area where you plan to put more of your focus? Discuss.

    Images: Shareaholic: MGNG Marketing, Pinterest

  • Link Expert Eric Ward Talks Fear And The Evolution Of Links

    Link Expert Eric Ward Talks Fear And The Evolution Of Links

    The nature of links on the web, particularly in relation to search, has changed a lot over the years, and there’s probably nobody out there with more insight into this than Eric Ward, who’s focused on this specific topic for many years.

    As Search Engine People says in an article about 58 SEO authorities, “Eric’s been building links since…1994. There’s literally no one in SEO that can claim that much experience.”

    If you search the phrase “link building expert” in any of the main search engines, you’ll likely find Ward right at the top.

    Ward is a longtime friend of WebProNews, and has offered his expertise throughout various industry publications, and we’re happy to have caught up with him after quite some time to gain some perspective on the state of links and linking in 2015.

    Has your link building strategy changed significantly over the years? Let us know in the comments.

    You’ve been in link building for 20 years or so. What are the biggest changes in strategy in 2015 compared to when you started?

    Eric Ward: “Thank you Chris for the opportunity to share my thoughts. Well first and foremost I have to say the biggest change is that today people who work in content promotion seem to fear links. Many people feel the very act of pursuing links has become evil, which is sad because it’s not even close to true. In 1994 nobody gave any thought to the idea that a link to a website could be a bad thing. The entire concept of a poisoned link profile is simultaneously comic and tragic. Links are not ‘things’. Links are not imbued with the quality of Good or Evil. Links are the visible manifestation of a human’s action and opinion, and in some cases, intent.”

    “For me the second biggest change over the years is the ease with which URLs can now be shared and migrate throughout the web and between people. There really was a time when the easiest way to tell somebody about a really cool site was just to call them on the phone and tell them the URL. This was back in the 14.4 modem days. If you were lucky a web page might give you the option to ‘Email this page to a friend’, but then you’d click that option and have to fill out a form requesting 21 fields of data from you first. I have fond memories of hundreds of sticky notes with URLs written on them stuck all over my monitors, keyboards, kitchen table, mirrors.”

    “But back to my previous comment about fearing links. The reason nobody had to fear links back then was because none of the search engines at that time used link analysis or any type of linking related metric as a part of their algorithms. These were the pre-Google days. That’s the key point. The linking strategies I would use then had nothing to do with any sort of manipulation of the search engines because there were no search engines to manipulate links for. SEO was on-page only.”

    “This ended up accidentally being the best thing that could’ve happened to me because I developed linking strategies for clients for several years before Google launched. This led me to pursue the very type of relevance related linking strategies Google wanted to see. I didn’t and still don’t believe in manipulation of organic rankings as a viable business strategy. I know what Google wants to see because of a twist of fate, that had me starting my linking and outreach service business before Google existed, again, by accident.”

    “What’s most rewarding is in many ways linking strategies have come full circle back to the way things were and should have remained. When Google launched, the SEO industry went through a period of time (probably more than a decade long) where many agencies and practitioners viewed links as commodities and people would use any kind of tactic, good, bad, ugly and everything in-between in their attempt to try to manipulate Google’s algorithm in their client’s favor.”

    “In some ways I find it kind of funny when companies who were proponents of extremely manipulative practices in the past suddenly talk about how we must comply with Google guidelines or else we could be penalized. This advice coming from the very people who gave you advice that got sites penalized in the first place. But that’s another story for another time.”

    “I guess if I had to boil down the biggest change of all from a strategy standpoint it would be in trying to help people realize that it is incredibly easy compared to the old days to get URLs to migrate or propagate across the web. What I mean by that is today everyone is a Link builder, they just don’t see themselves that way, and many linking strategists overlook this.”

    How about compared to the pre-Penguin era?

    EW: “Once Google aimed its scope at backlink profiles, and more specifically what it considered to be unnatural backlink profiles, it was truly a game changer. For the first time the links pointing to your site could end up hurting you rather than helping you or simply being ignored. The impact of that change cannot be underestimated.”

    As Google continues to put more of its own content and direct answers in search results, has the value of links declined at all from an SEO standpoint?

    EW: “Yes and no. If your entire business model was centered around a high Google ranking, and your content provided people with answers to questions that Google now answers directly, well the reality is you’re screwed. Let’s not sugarcoat it. Once upon a time Google was a shuttle taking you to whatever site it thought had the answer you needed. Now if Google can give you the answer directly, it makes perfect sense for them to do so. Sure your site may still be there among the top ranked sites, but I don’t need to click that link and visit your site because Google just answered my question.”

    “However, there are still hundreds of different types of businesses and verticals for which it does not make sense for Google to provide a direct answer because a direct answer is not what the searcher is looking for. It is in those instances and for those businesses that a linking strategy should still incorporate tactics that are intended to improve organic ranking. However I must always include this caveat: you never want to rely solely on any search engine as the primary means for your businesses success, and your content strategies should not involve anything designed to try and fool the Google brain trust.”

    How has the Disavow Links tool impacted linking?

    EW: “More than anything it seems to me like an admission from Google that there are links on the web for which it cannot truly determine the intent or rationale behind why those links exist. Otherwise they would not need us to disavow them. They would be able to recognize and discount them themselves, without our help.”

    “What’s interesting to think about though is we now have a scenario where millions of people are uploading disavow files that collectively represent billions of URLs. In some ways you could argue this is a crowd-sourced spam detection signal that Google could use to improve their algorithm. For example imagine if you were to do a co-citation analysis across all those disavow files. What does it mean if the same URL or domain is disavowed by 15,000 different people?”

    Do you believe Google should just ignore links it doesn’t find valuable rather than making webmasters jump through hoops to have them discounted?

    EW: “Yes. And the reason I feel this way is there are many people who find themselves spending significant amounts of time trying to undo links that have been placed there by people who were working on the site long before they were. Or even if they placed them there themselves, they now have to spend time removing them, and that’s time that might be better spent creating a more useful content experience for the site’s users. Ask yourself this: would you rather spend six months researching and sending link takedowns, or six months creating awesome new content?”

    You recently tweeted that “link strategists are affected as well,” in reference to an article about the B2B SEO opportunity in organizational mergers and acquisitions. Can you elaborate on that?

    EW: “I’ve seen many cases where companies merge or acquire the assets of another company and among those assets are websites, often more than one, sometimes several, maybe even 10 or 20. Each of those websites was likely launched at a different time, and over the years, each of those sites developed its own individual and distinct backlink profile. Now when we have a merger one of the things that has to be taken into consideration is what do we do with all this link equity that is spread across all of these various web properties that are now owned by the same entity. Sometimes the answer is to leave them just as they are, or it may be better to merge some of the sites that have a similar target audience or client base, or, the best strategic move may be something else entirely. I think the best linking strategists are those of us who can take a look at the big picture of all of those brands and sites, look at the mergers and acquisitions and help navigate the client through the best strategy that will maximize the link equity. There is no one-size-fits-all solution to the link equity challenge.”

    I read your piece on the “link apocalypse,” which made some great points about how different sites should be taking different approaches to link building. Can you talk a little bit about that?

    EW: “I wrote that column almost 8 years ago, and I have to be careful here to fight the urge to say ‘I told you so’. Still, if you read that piece I don’t think there’s anything in there that did not end up coming to pass. But let’s be honest. I can’t be that smart or I wouldn’t still be working.”

    “But…aside from the specific predictions, the main thesis of that piece is that marketers must respect that which makes one site different from another site. The example I used in the article was intended to be funny but also illustrate the point. A site about whale watching in Iceland does not need the same link building strategy as a site about spelunking in Arkansas or accordion repair in Biloxi. Unfortunately though, for over a decade companies have been trying to sell link building packages in a cookie-cutter approach without regard to what differentiates one site’s mission and passion and content from another.”

    What’s the one piece of link building advice you’d give above all else in 2015?

    EW: “Don’t use your website to just write about yourself and how awesome you are. Don’t use your blog to simply write a little bit longer summary of one of your products or services or an in-depth profile of your CEO or how awesome your staff is. Instead, make other people, places, events, and other industry specific happenings the stars of your content. It will come back to you in the form of links, shares, likes, tweets and quite possibly, earned improved rankings.”

    “Give to get. Just like 1994.”

    “Thank you again Chris for the opportunity to share my thoughts and now please everybody go to http://ericward.com/lmp and sign up for LinkMoses Private, my Linking Strategies Newsletter where I provide effective linking strategies, tactics, Q/A, advice, and and Link Opportunity Alerts. I’m also available for consults and very specialized link dev projects. I’ve got three kids to put through college, so I wont be retiring anytime soon :)”

    And thank you, Eric for the great (as always) insight into the state of link building.

    How have your linking and link building practices changed over the years? Please discuss in the comments.

  • Data Confirms Google Is Wiping Out A Whole Category Of Websites

    Data Confirms Google Is Wiping Out A Whole Category Of Websites

    Last month, we reported that Google may have just killed a whole category of websites – lyrics sites. New data shows that search visibility for some of these sites has indeed drastically declined. While it’s interesting enough for this particular niche, it also highlights how Google is capable of basically wiping out an entire niche by adding one type of direct answer to its search results. That, of course, is something it’s doing more and more of as time goes on, and it’s bound to hurt third-party websites as it does.

    Are you worried that Google is squeezing out too many third-party websites in favor of its own content? Let us know in the comments.

    While Google doesn’t display lyrics in search results for every song, or even for every type of lyric query, it does so for many basic queries. Last month, we used “goodbye horses lyrics” as an example. Search for that, and Google displays the following:

    As we also noted at the time, Google displays a link to Google Play at the bottom of the box, which would seem to give those complaining about any “anti-competitive” practices Google may engage in something new to complain about. Clicking the link takes you to a Google Play page that hosts the lyrics, and lets you purchase the song from Google. Some queries will even cut off the lyrics and send you to the Google Play page before you can even read them all:

    There’s no way this wasn’t going to hurt lyrics sites. Now SearchMetrics has put out lists of the top winners and losers of 2014 in terms of search visibility (hat tip to Search Engine Land). The “falling stars” list is littered with lyrics sites.

    eLyrics.net saw a 92% drop. LyricsMode and Sing365 each fell 60%. LyricsFreak dropped 59%. MetroLyrics dropped 12%. Last.fm, which links to MetroLyrics for song lyrics saw a decline of 18%.

    Take a look at the full list:

    Domain Loss in % Category
    guardian.co.uk -100 *Redirected
    mayoclinic.com -97 *Redirected
    elyrics.net -92 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    patch.com -72 Web Portal
    lyricsmode.com -60 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    sing365.com -60 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    lyricsfreak.com -59 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    tvtropes.org -59 News/Video
    discovery.com -59 News/Video
    starpulse.com -57 News/Video
    thefreedictionary.com -54 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    topix.com -49 Social/Portal
    thesaurus.com -48 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    nndb.com -45 Info
    netflix.com -45 News/Video
    myspace.com -40 Social/Portal
    aol.com -39 Internet/Computer/Tech
    flickr.com -39 Social/Portal
    chicagotribune.com -37 News/Video
    nbcnews.com -36 News/Video
    funnyordie.com -35 Social/Portal
    answers.com -35 Q&A/Expert
    examiner.com -35 News/Video
    alexa.com -34 Info
    simplyrecipes.com -32 Social/Portal
    tumblr.com -31 Social/Portal
    ask.com -30 Internet/Computer/Tech
    askmen.com -28 Blog
    indeed.com -27 Classif
    zap2it.com -27 News/Video
    zazzle.com -27 Retail
    expedia.com -27 Travel
    moviefone.com -26 News/Video
    blogspot.com -26 Blog
    foxnews.com -24 News/Video
    dailymotion.com -23 News/Video
    photobucket.com -23 Social/Portal
    toptenreviews.com -22 Price/Classif
    wikitravel.org -22 Travel
    food.com -21 Cooking
    msn.com -21 News/Video
    howstuffworks.com -21 Q&A/Expert
    mashable.com -21 Blog
    enchantedlearning.com -21 Q&A/Expert
    cbsnews.com -21 News/Video
    usatoday.com -20 News/Video
    latimes.com -20 News/Video
    nba.com -18 Info
    last.fm -18 Social/Portal
    rapgenius.com -17 *Redirected
    gethuman.com -16 Info
    crunchbase.com -16 Info
    nydailynews.com -15 News/Video
    nytimes.com -15 News/Video
    city-data.com -14 Adress
    cnn.com -13 News/Video
    huffingtonpost.com -13 News/Video
    nationalgeographic.com -12 News/Video
    whitepages.com -12 Adress
    metrolyrics.com -12 Enc/Dict/Lyrics
    medicalnewstoday.com -11 Med
    retailmenot.com -11 Price/Classif
    perezhilton.com -10 Blog

    RapGenius saw a decline of negative 17%, though there’s a little more to that story. As SearchMetrics notes, it now redirects to Genius, so that can account for a drop in visibility on that domain.

    At the tail end of 2013, Rap Genius was penalized by Google, but the penalty was quickly lifted early last year. The company has since expanded its business model into annotations of content beyond lyrics. In fact, they’ve already been in the news this week with ambitions of annotating the web.

    SearchMetrics shows the visibility picture for RapGenius.com and Genius.com with the re-direct occurring in mid-July.

    Genius and Rap Genius
    Lyrics are still a substantial part of the site, and it’s worth noting that Genius.com’s visibility has been shaky with a noticeable downward trend at the end of the year. SearchMetrics compares this to MayoClinic, which re-directed from a .com to a .org, and had a lot better luck:

    mayo clinic search visibility
    Suffice it to say, the picture is a bit bleak for lyrics sites. Granted, we don’t know how much of the drop-off in visibility for these sites is a direct result of Google’s showing lyrics in its search results (though I’d guess a significant amount). Lyrics sites have often appeared on loser lists from SearchMetrics in connection with various iterations of the Panda update.

    Another thing worth noting is that one lyrics site actually appears on the winners list this time. AZLyrics managed to post a gain of 24% Perhaps this is a result of declines from competitors.

    Bing shows lyrics on its search results pages too, but doesn’t appear to do so for all the same songs Google does.

    Are the search engines going too far with the amount of information they’re showing directly on results pages? Let us know what you think.

    Images via Google, SearchMetrics

  • Get Ready For Google’s New Mobile Ranking Signal

    Get Ready For Google’s New Mobile Ranking Signal

    Throughout the course of last year, Google made a bunch of moves showing that it was focusing on improving the mobile search experience for its users by way of getting websites (otherwise known as search results) to make themselves more mobile-friendly.

    In November, Google added a “mobile-friendly” label to mobile search results for sites that deserve such a title. It also said it was experimenting with using the same criteria that would earn a site the label for a ranking signal to give mobile-friendly sites even more love in the search results.

    Are you concerned about Google’s potential mobile-friendly ranking signal? Is this a positive step for Google? Let us know what you think in the comments.

    Now, webmasters are getting warnings from Google when their sites aren’t mobile-friendly, which may suggest that Google is about to implement that ranking signal. According to Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable, who says several of his clients received the warning over the weekend, these are being sent out at mass scale by way of email and Webmaster Tools.

    Schwartz shows a screenshot of one of the warnings, which says, “Fix mobile usability issues found on http://www…..” and then:

    Google systems have tested 3,670 pages from your site and found that 100% of them have critical mobile usability errors. The errors on these 3,670 pages severely affect how mobile users are able to experience your website. These pages will not be seen as mobile-friendly by Google Search, and will therefore be displayed and ranked appropriately for smartphone users.

    The message goes on to tell the webmaster to find problematic pages, learn about mobile-friendly design, and fix the mobile usability issues on the site. There is a link to view a report on the non-mobile-friendly pages, as well as one point to Google’s mobile-friendly guidelines. It also has links to a guide to making a CMS mobile-friendly, a page on Google’s Developer site about building mobile-friendly sites, and the Webmaster Central Forum, where webmasters are encouraged to ask more questions.

    Here’s another of the messages Martin Oxby shared on Twitter:

    Schwartz says Google had previously only notified sites that were “supposedly mobile friendly” when they had usability issues, but now they’re targeting sites that just aren’t at all mobile-friendly.

    The mobile-friendly labels should be fully rolled out on a global basis by now. In mid-November, Google said it was rolling it out over the next few weeks. When the company made the announcement, it also laid out some criteria for earning the label as detected by Googlebot.

    For one, a site should avoid software that isn’t common on mobile devices. It specifically mentioned Flash as an example. This actually follows Google’s previous shaming of Flash sites in mobile search results. Last summer, Google started showing messages for results that may not work in mobile results, such as “Uses Flash. May not work on your device.”

    Google says sites should use text that is readable without zooming, and should size content to the screen so that users don’t have to scroll horizontally or zoom. Links should also be placed far enough apart so that the correct one can be tapped easily.

    Google has a Mobile-Friendly Test tool here, which webmasters should find particularly helpful. You can simply enter a URL, and Google will analyze it and report if it has a mobile-friendly design.

    If a URL passes the test, it will tell you that the page is mobile-friendly, and give you some additional resources, including information about how Googlebot sees the page.

    If the URL fails the test, you’ll get reasons why the page isn’t mobile-friendly, as well as info about how Googlebot sees it, and resources to help you fix issues.

    After Google gave the news about using mobile-freindly as a ranking signal in November, the company said it would continue to use desktop signals for ranking mobile results. Google’s John Mueller said this in a Webmaster Central mobile office hours hangout:

    We need to focus on the desktop page for the search results for the most part. That’s also the one that you use with the rel canonical. As we pick up more information from mobile-friendly pages or from mobile pages in general, then I would expect that to flow into the rankings as well. So that’s something to keep in mind there.

    I’d still make sure that your mobile friendly pages are as fast as possible, that they work really well on mobile devices, that you’re going past just essentially the required minimum that we had with the mobile friendly tool, and really providing a great experience on mobile. Because lots of people are using mobile to kind of make their decisions, to read content, and if your site is kind of minimally usable on mobile, but really a bad user experience, really, really slow, then that’s something that users will notice as well and they’ll jump off and do something else or go to a different site.

    You can listen to him talk about that subject about 18 minutes and 50 seconds into the following video.

    Google has been asking random mobile users to rate their search results based on a five-star rating system ranging from poor to excellent.


    Last fall, Google Webmaster Tools added mobile usability tracking. This includes graphs that look at mobile issues over time, so you can see any progress you’ve made.

    Muller had this to say when announcing that: “A mobile-friendly site is one that you can easily read & use on a smartphone, by only having to scroll up or down. Swiping left/right to search for content, zooming to read text and use UI elements, or not being able to see the content at all make a site harder to use for users on mobile phones. To help, the Mobile Usability reports show the following issues: Flash content, missing viewport (a critical meta-tag for mobile pages), tiny fonts, fixed-width viewports, content not sized to viewport, and clickable links/buttons too close to each other.”

    “We strongly recommend you take a look at these issues in Webmaster Tools, and think about how they might be resolved; sometimes it’s just a matter of tweaking your site’s template!” he added.

    Google continues to look for ways to improve Webmaster Tools as the nature of search results continues to shift. Last week, it launched a new structured data tool to help webmasters author and publish markup on their sites. The company says it will better reflect Google’s interpretation of your site.

    Google is also asking webmasters for some ideas for new tools and features. The company wants to know what people want from it in 2015, and has a Google Moderator page where you can add your own suggestions or vote on others.

    What would you like to see Google add to Webmaster Tools? Let us know in the comments.

  • Google Gives Webmasters New Structured Data Tool

    Google announced that it is giving webmasters a new structured data tool to help them author and publish markup on their websites. The new tool, it says, will better reflect Google’s interpretation of your content.

    structured data tool

    google structured data tool

    The tool provides validation for all Google features powered by structured data, support for markup in the JSON-LD syntax (including dynamic HTML pages), clean display of the structured data items on your page, and syntax highlighting of markup problems in your source code.

    They also updated the documentation and policy guidelines for Google features that are powered by structured data.

    “We’ve clarified our documentation for the vocabulary supported in structured data based on webmasters’ feedback,” Google says in a blog post. “The new documentation explains the markup you need to add to enable different search features for your content, along with code examples in the supported syntaxes. We’ll be retiring the old documentation soon.”

    They also clarified policies on using structured data, and are encouraging people who see abuse to report spam.

    “We’ve extended our support for schema.org vocabulary in JSON-LD syntax to new use cases: company logos and contacts, social profile links, events in the Knowledge Graph, the sitelinks search box, and event rich snippets,” Google adds. “We’re working on expanding support to additional markup-powered features in the future.”

    Earlier this week, Google announced that you can now use markup to add social profile links to the Knowledge Graph as seen below:

    social profiles in google knowledge graph

    You can include Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, and/or Myspace. More on all of that here.

    If you’re wanting more from Google in Webmaster Tools, the company is also calling on webmasters to give them suggestions for new ideas. You can submit suggestions or vote on those submitted by others.

    Images via Google

  • Your Brand’s Social Profiles Can Now Appear In Google’s Knowledge Graph

    As some have noticed, Google has started displaying social media profiles in the Knowledge Graph area of search results pages for many brand searches. If you search for Wendy’s, for example, you can very clearly see links to their profiles on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Google+.

    The same holds true for Chase, Nike, Starbucks, and any other number of brands you can think of. This is good news for consumers who wish to engage with brands, without sifting through search results trying to find the appropriate channel. This makes them very easy to find.

    It’s also good for businesses for that very same reason, and the even better news is that it’s not limited to major brands like those mentioned. Google is offering businesses markup to enable the search engine to display social profiles for their brands.

    Google’s Zineb Ait Bahajji made the announcement on Google+ (via Search Engine Land):


    In case you didn’t feel like clicking to expand that post, supported profiles include Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Myspace. That’s right. You can even proudly display your Myspace profile. Google says it encourages you to specific additional social profiles as well, but for now, they won’t appear in the Google search results the way the others do.

    Google says its algorithms process the social profiles yo specify, and display the most relevant ones based on individual user queries, so people won’t always necessarily see the same ones. It’s also worth noting that Google will only show verified profiles for sites that have a verification process. That’s not good news for brands wanting to display their Twitter profiles, as Twitter is notoriously stingy about handing out verifications.

    You can find the documentation for setting up your structured markup here.

  • Google Wants Some Ideas For Webmaster Tools Again. Got Any?

    Google is once again calling on webmasters for ideas on how to improve Google Search and Webmaster Tools. The company put out a brief Google+ update early this morning:

    What would you like to see from Google Websearch & Webmaster Tools in 2015?

    We’d love to hear your feedback & collect your suggestions on the kinds of things you’d wish to see being added, improved, removed, or changed by the Webmaster Tools and websearch teams at Google.

    Google is offering a Google Moderator page where you can submit suggestions and vote one those that others have contributed. Of course there’s no guarantee that Google will act upon any of these suggestions, even if they’re voted the highest, but it’s interesting to see what people want, and at least this gives Google a good way to get a feel for that.

    “What can we do to make your life – as a webmaster, producer of great content, or SEO – easier this year?” Google asks on the page.

    As of the time of this writing, there are over a hundred suggestions with with over 1,100 votes. The top one right now is: “Show more than 1,000 entries for any error report. 5,000 or 10,000 would be helpful.”

    Other popular suggestions include:

    “An automated action viewer, so webmasters can see if they were impacted by an algorithm such as Panda or Penguin.”

    “I would like to see in WMT data from 12 months, not 3 as it is now :)”

    Along side the manual penalty notices, a message to say whether or not an algorithmic penalty is applied to a website, and if so, what type of penalty and what action might help resolve it.”

    “Year on year comparison by month for impressions and clicks query data.”

    “Moe to account structure so http, https, subdomains (even subfolders) of one site can all be accessed and managed easily.”

    “I would like to see a much more detailed link tool within WMT. It would be nice to see all links, especially the latest ones without having to click around and download a .csv. Show us who is linking to which pages using what anchor text natively.”

    “I would like to see all back links data with nofollow and dofollow declaration separately. If possible also provide bad links and quality links checker.”

    There are plenty more where those came from.

    This is your chance to let your voice be heard, so if you’ve been wanting something from Google in this area, you better let them know. There’s a good possibility you’ll have additional like-minded webmasters backing you up with votes, and who knows? Maybe it will make a difference.

    Before you tell Google what you want, we’d love to hear it too in the comments.

    Image via Google

  • Pinterest SEO: Things To Consider

    Pinterest SEO: Things To Consider

    A lot of website owners and marketers are still trying to crack the Pinterest nut. If Facebook referrals start evaporating, that will no doubt be the case even more. Currently, Pinterest is second behind Facebook for driving website referrals as far as social networks are concerned.

    Promoted Pins will be a big storyline this year, and search is a big part of that. But what about simple organic Pinterest SEO? What can you do to get more out of Pinterest, and its search feature in particular?

    Do you currently consider search optimization techniques for Pinterest as part of your online marketing strategy? Let us know in the comments.

    Pew just released some new Pinterest growth stats. Men in the U.S. using Pinterest jumped from 8% in 2013 to 13%. 42% of online women are Pinterest users. It’s more popular than Twitter, according to the firm. 21% said they use Pinterest, up from 15% last year., compared to 18% for Twitter.

    Pew tells us, “In 2014, the number of men on the site doubled, and we see that growth continue today – ⅓ of all signups are men (50/50 men/women in markets like India, Korea and Japan). In the past year, monthly active users outside the U.S. grew by 150%. Since launching Guided Search nine months ago, the number of searches per person has increased by 25%.

    What Pinterest Says About SEO

    First, let’s look at what Pinterest itself says about search visibility: “Search is an important way for Pinners to find content from your business. If you use Rich Pins and have a verified account, your Pins appear higher in search results. Another crucial way to improve your appearance in search results is to sharpen your Pin descriptions.” Emphasis added.

    Pinterest gives some helpful tips right in its official business guide:

    Note that they’re giving you a specific example of an account that’s doing it right – Tory Buch. You can peruse their pins and descriptions here to get a feel for how they do it.

    Pinterest goes on to give some additional tips about descriptions. For recipes, you would describe the main ingredients and how to cook the dish. For fashion, you would include the type of clothing, the designer, and/or the season. For travel, you would include the location and the kinds of things you can do there. For DIY, you would describe the project, and how to make it, as well as the materials needed to get the job done. For photography, you would name the photographer, the year, the subject, and/or the publication. For design, you would mention the designer, medium, publication, etc.

    Basically, regardless of the type of content you’re pinning, you want to be as descriptive as possible and include all of the relevant keywords. Pretty straightforward. Note in the image above, however, that they advise against just dropping in keywords or hashtags. It’s unclear if this is actually detrimental on an algorithmic level, but either way, you probably just don’t want to do it that way.

    Another key to making your content more easily found in Pinterest searches is to make it easier for people to submit the content to PInterest in the first place. This means taking action on your own site by using high-quality images (ideally at least 600 pixels wide), including the Pin it button, and using rich pins (Product Pins, Article Pins, Place Pins to automatically include information like price, availability, ingredients, location, etc. This is done by adding some meta tags to your site. Pinterest points to Lowe’s as a good example of a a site well designed for Pinterest. They added a “Pinterest-friendly” section for creative ideas, with at least one project that has been pinned over 200,000 times.

    “The more people Pin your content, the more discoverable it becomes,” Pinterest says. “To encourage more Pinning, make it easy to Pin from your website and emails. Promote your Pinterest account on social channels, packaging and advertising.”

    You should use Pinterest Analytics to see which pins are popular, and which ones are driving the most traffic to your site. It will also show you which boards your content is appearing on and how others have described it, which could lead to some helpful revelations.

    “All of these insights will help you make smarter choices about your merchandising, product development and marketing strategy,” Pinterest says.

    It’s probably a good idea to use your Pinterest account well, because it might help you gain some credence when it comes to search result ranking (I’ve not confirmed this, but it’s something to consider). The company does suggest pinning at least once a day so followers get fresh content, and not just pinning your own stuff.

    “You can tell a richer story by adding Pins from others,” it says. “You could partner with bloggers and lifestyle websites to Pin their content. Your followers will appreciate the Pins, and bloggers will appreciate the referral traffic.”

    Engagement with other users through follows, repins, likes, and comments, is also recommended, as is creating group boards and inviting people who “love your brand” to contribute.

    Keep in mind, you can optimize your actual boards to some extent. Give them clear, relevant names. They should be kept to 20 characters or less. Otherwise they can get cut off. Also include descriptions of the boards, again, using relevant keywords. You can choose a cover pin, so you should choose one that’s relevant, enticing, and will make the user want to follow that board. You might consider using the one with the most repins.

    Pinterest recommends putting your most relevant boards at the top of your boards page. You can easily drag and drop them.

    The company also gives a helpful tip you might not have considered: “Try Pinning a handful of Pins at once that together tell a story and capture the imagination. For example, a Pin of a patterned dress next to the place that inspired it is more compelling than just a product photo.”

    If you want to look at an account that gets boards right, check out The Container Store. Pinterest points out how they create boards with pins organized to appeal to different audiences.

    On a side note, unlike the direction that Facebook may be going in, Pinterest actually encourages linking out. In its business guide, it says, “For example, a movie Pin should lead to the trailer or a review, and a product Pin should lead to where a Pinner can make the purchase.”

    Pinterest, at least for now, wants to send you traffic.

    People Search Pinterest With Intent To Buy

    Vision Critical published a study that found that 28% of Pinterest purchasers say they were searching for the item they pinned and purchased or for an item like it. In the health and beauty vertical, the number is 47% (it goes down to 17% for food and drink purchasers). As Pinterest continues to grow, and attracts more people, it stands to reason that the number will grow for additional verticals. In fact, the survey used for the study is nearly two years old anyway, so it’s likely already grown, particularly as Pinterest has put more emphasis on search in the past year.

    For comparison 47% of purchasers said they just happened upon the item they pinned without searching for it. Interestingly, that number goes down for technology purchases and up for food and drink purchases.

    Other Factors To Consider

    Vincent Ng, who was early on the Pinterest marketing train says in his eBook How to Search Optimize Your Pins and Boards For Pinterest and Search Engines, “You also want to make sure that your business pins show up as frequently at the top of search results as much possible. It’s better to have five pins for a specific term show up instead of just one, or worse yet, none. It’s just too easy for one pin to be lost in an ocean of millions of pins.”

    Ng recently appeared on the Social Media Examiner podcast. He talked a little about how Pinterest is getting better at image recognition, and applying that to search.

    “What’s really fascinating is that Pinterest is starting to have visual recognition engines, so they recognize certain colors and certain patterns refer to a coffee table [for example], so even though a picture in the pin description may not say ‘coffee table,’ if enough people in the past have referred to that image as a coffee table, you might see a pin that is a coffee table, but that doesn’t use that kind of description.”

    Still, I see no reason not to include good descriptions.

    Ng also noted that more people are starting searches on Pinterest rather than Google for certain types of searches – typically lifestyle. The biggest mistake people make when it comes to losing traffic, he says, is not making sure the pin goes to the right URL. You should always check the source of a pin, and edit accordingly.

    In his book, Ng makes some good points about keywords on Pinterest. For one, you can find highly searched keywords by starting to type in the search box, and seeing what comes up:

    He also suggests that putting keywords early in the description can help, though doing some random searches, I get the idea that this might not be as big of a factor now as maybe it was when the book was written. Exact keyword matches work best, according to the book, but again, the evolution of Pinterest search may have downplayed this.

    The number of repins does appear to be a major factor, which makes perfect sense, though freshness shouldn’t be counted out. In the example below, the pin in the top right has less than 40 repins, yet it is among others that have thousands, but it is only two days old, while the others have been around for much longer.

    As noted, a lot has happened with Pinterest’s search feature over the last year, so let’s circle back around to advice Pinterest itself is giving out. Search Engine Land shared some tips from Anna Majkowska, a software manager on Pinterest’s search team, back in October. These boil down to optimizing your profile, verifying your site, installing pin it buttons, writing strong descriptions, using rich pins, checking your links, getting more followers, and finding your niches. Maybe not all that much has changed after all, from an optimization standpoint.

    What tactics have you seen work for increasing Pinterest effectiveness. Please share in the comments.

  • Google May Have Just Killed A Whole Category Of Websites

    Over time, Google has been showing more and more content on search results pages, resulting in people having to click over to third-party websites for fewer and fewer things. Now, Google is showing song lyrics, in what should be considered an enormous blow to lyrics sites.

    Is Google going overboard with the content it’s providing on search results page or is it just delivering a better user experience? Both? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Search “Goodbye Horses lyrics,” for example, and you’ll get the song’s words in all their glory. That’s on both mobile and desktop.

    As you may notice, these results feature a link to Google Play at the bottom of the box, so those concerned about Google being anti-competitive will have a new thing to complain about. If you click Google Play, it takes you to a Google Play page that hosts the lyrics, but also the option to buy the song from Google.

    In some cases, a search will return only some of the lyrics, and a prompt to get the “full lyrics on Google Play”.

    This might be a U.S. feature only right now. It doesn’t appear to be showing up in Europe at the moment, which isn’t too surprising given that Google is under the eye of competitive scrutiny over there.

    Google is currently embroiled in a years-long antitrust investigation into its search business. Among the complaints against it is that it favors its own results. Google escaped a similar probe in the U.S. by the Federal Trade Commission a couple years ago.

    In reality, the feature does make Google better from the user standpoint. It makes it much easier to find the words to songs, but it’s definitely going to anger some website owners. As you probably know by now, though, Google says it caters to users, not websites.

    I guess Genius (formerly Rap Genius) didn’t get the last laugh after all. You may recall that Google had penalized the lyrics site briefly for violating webmaster guidelines.

    On a higher level, this is an interesting look at how Google can basically wipe out an entire category of websites in one fell swoop. Which category will be next.

    In all fairness, lyrics sites can try to get more out of non-Google traffic sources. Genius has already tried to Google proof itself with an app. Either way, Google’s move is a huge blow to all such sites. Lyrics are something that people search for probably far more often than they share them on social media.

    Now, enjoy having Goodbye Horses stuck in your head for the rest of the day.

    Should Google show this kind of content directly in search results? Let us know what you think.

    Via Search Engine Roundtable

    Image via Google

  • Google Rolls Local Update Out To More Countries

    Back in July, Google launched an algorithm update that shook up local search results in the U.S. While Google never gave it an official name like Panda or Penguin that we’re aware of, Search Engine Land started calling it the “Pigeon” update, and that’s what people in the industry have, for the most part, adopted for it.

    That update has now reportedly started rolling out to other countries including the UK, Canada, and Australia.

    Back in July when the update launched, people noticed missing 7 packs in some types of local results, and Google confirmed the update, saying that it “ties deeper into their web search capabilities, including the hundreds of ranking signals they use in web search, along with search reatures such as Knowledge Graph, spelling correction, synonyms, and more.”

    The update was also said to improve distance and location parameters.

    Search Engine Land is now reporting that the update has significantly affected local businesses in the new regions, and points out that Google is, once again, making major algorithm changes around the holidays, which it had pretty much stopped doing until recently.

    As we’ve talked about in the past, Google updates around the holidays can deliver major blows to businesses at the most important sales time of the year. Now, not only are they rolling this update out, they’ve been slowly rolling out a new version of Penguin.

    Image via Google

  • Google: Clicks On App Deep Links Jumped By 10x Last Quarter

    Google started testing app indexing on Android in October of last year, adding deep links from apps within search results on its operating system. In June, they opened it up to everyone.

    On Tuesday, Google provided an update on what’s going on with it, encouraging more webmasters to take advantage. What’s going on with it is that clicks on app deep links jumped by 10x last quarter, according to the company, with 15% of signed-in Google searches on Android now returning deep links.

    In other words, the amount of these types of results is growing, and people are clicking on them more, so you might want to get your app in the mix, especially considering that Google is increasingly focusing on a site’s mobile user experience when it comes to ranking mobile results (though they do still take desktop signals into consideration).

    Google’s app indexing update includes four steps to monitor app performance and drive user engagement, which include: Give your app developer access to Webmaster Tools; Understand how your app is doing in search results; Make sure key app resources can be crawled; and Watch out for Android App errors. Obviously they go into more detail about how to achieve all of this.

    Information related to app indexing that Google shows in Webmaster Tools includes: errors in indexed pages within apps, weekly clicks and impressions from app deep links via Google search; and stats on your sitemap (if that’s how you implemented the app deep links). Google says it will be adding a lot more in the coming months.

    There are two new ways to track performance for your app deep links. Google will send a weekly clicks and impressions update to the Message center in in WMT, and you can now track how much traffic app deep links drive to your app using referrer information (referrer extra in the ACTION_VIEW intent). The company says it’s working to integrate this info with Google Analytics.

    “Blocked resources are one of the top reasons for the ‘content mismatch’ errors you see in Webmaster Tools’ Crawl Errors report,” says Google Webmaster Trends analyst Mariya Moeva. “We need access to all the resources necessary to render your app page. This allows us to assess whether your associated web page has the same content as your app page.”

    “To help you identify errors when indexing your app, we’ll send you messages for all app errors we detect, and will also display most of them in the ‘Android apps’ tab of the Crawl errors report,” Moeva says.

    Google has three new error types that go along with the existing “content mismatch” and “intent URI not supported” error alerts: APK not found, no first-click free, and back button violation. Check out the original post for more on all of this.

    You can bet that app indexing is only going to become a bigger part of mobile search, so if you have an app, you should probably start paying attention to this stuff. Otherwise, you might find yourself left behind on mobile search. And who knows? That could even affect you on the desktop eventually.

    Image via Google

  • Facebook Finally Adds Graph Search To Mobile, Adds Post Search

    Facebook has really been taking its sweet time with the roll-out of certain Graph Search features. While it has promised to make it available for mobile devices and add the ability to search actual posts for a long time, only now are these features launching on a wide scale. And even this roll-out is limited as the mobile update is for iPhone only.

    The post search feature, however, is also being made available for desktop. You’ll now be able to search for what your friends were saying about Too Many Cooks.

    “You’ve given us a lot of feedback on the Graph Search beta,” Facebook said in its announcement. “You’ve told us the most important thing is being able to find posts you’ve seen before, and now you can. With a quick search, you can get back to a fun video from your graduation, a news article you’ve been meaning to read, or photos from your friend’s wedding last summer.”

    “Your search results are personalized and unique to you and, as always, you can only see things that have been shared with you,” it added.

    The addition of Post search could open up some new opportunities for marketers. It is interesting that Facebook is emphasizing that you’ll see posts “you’ve seen before”. It’s unclear if the feature is limited to this. There are certainly posts that users could see, but may miss for one reason or another. Ask any Facebook Page admin what their organic reach is looking like, and they’ll tell you that most of their posts are only hitting a percentage of their eligible audiences. Hopefully, Facebook will show you content that you are eligible to see, and not just posts you’ve actually seen. We’ll have to explore this further.

    Either way, it’s nice that the company is finally getting around to making this feature (which it announced over a year ago) more available. No word on when Graph Search will make its way to Android.

    Image via Facebook

  • Google Penguin Update Will Probably Just Continue Indefinitely

    As you may know, Google’s latest Penguin update, which launched in October, is still rolling out. Google had said that it would be a slow rollout from the beginning, but here we are two months later, and it’s still going. They really weren’t kidding.

    Some may take issue with the fact that Google is pushing such a major update during the holiday shopping season. If you get hit by a Google update this time of year, you risk losing major sales if you’re selling things online that people might want to purchase as gifts.

    Either way, it’s continuing, and you probably shouldn’t count on Google to let you know when it’s done. Google’s John Mueller, whom you might as well consider the new Matt Cutts at this point, for all intents and purposes, conducted a Webmaster Hangout, as he often does. In it, he seemed to indicate that the update will continue, that Google might not publicly say when it stops, and that the goal is for it to continue updating. In other words, much like Panda before it, Penguin will probably just keep going on regularly.

    “We’re hoping that these things will keep updating,” he said.

    The good news with that scenario is that if you get hit by the update it should be a lot easier to recover. Before, you had to make the necessary changes to your site, and then sit patiently and wait for Google to launch another update. The last time, it took them a year to do so. The bad news, I guess, is that there is also a greater chance that you’ll be affected by the update.

    Of course the primary goal of Penguin is to get rid of spam, so if you’re not doing spammy stuff, you should be safe from that part of the algorithm. That does assume that Google’s algorithm is actually doing its job correctly.

    Via Search Engine Roundtable

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Should Google Be Rolling Penguin Out During Holiday Shopping Season?

    Should Google Be Rolling Penguin Out During Holiday Shopping Season?

    As you may recall, Google finally launched a new Penguin update in October after an entire year of not releasing one. The update, Google said, would roll out slowly. It was unclear just how slowly, but we knew it was still chugging away roughly a month ago.

    Now, we learn that the very same update is still rolling out. In other words, when Google said it would be a slow roll-out, they really weren’t kidding.

    With the holiday shopping season underway, do you think Google should have timed this update better? Let us know what you think in the comments.

    Late last week, Search Engine Roundtable reported on various rumblings from different forums, suggesting that Google had launched a major update. This was somewhat troubling, as the holiday shopping season is now in full gear, and it’s not very cool of Google to mess with people’s businesses around that time. Google actually appeared to have learned its lesson on that after the notorious Florida update many years ago. In more recent years, Google has indeed indicated that it tries to avoid major changes at such critical times.

    SER’s Barry Schwartz is now reporting that Google said the mystery update was actually just still that same Penguin update. While Google hasn’t released any new major update for the holidays, I suppose some still may find it troubling that such a major update would still be affecting people during this time of year.

    Of course Google is focusing on the users, not businesses.

    On the flip side of things, a lot of businesses have been anxiously awaiting Google’s Penguin update for a long time. They’ve spent the time and resources required to clean up their sites, or at least hope that they’ve done enough. The only way to know for sure is to see what happens when Penguin rolls back into town.

    For anybody trying to make some extra holiday sales that have been awaiting recovery, the timing might be a blessing.

    There’s also the obvious possibility that if you were hit negatively by the Penguin update this time around, you were doing things you shouldn’t’ have been. Google doesn’t always get it right, but it usually does. Longtime search reporter Danny Sullivan, who was already a vet by the time the Florida update happened in 2003, wrote a post comparing Penguin to Florida just after Penguin initially launched. He looked at the similarities in comments from people hit by each algorithm, and noted that in all the Penguin examples he looked at, he found clear cases of spamming. He later recalled a common “complaint” by angry businesses:

    Ah, but perhaps Google’s just trying to let the big companies win. Sure, I heard this after the Florida Update, that Google was going after the mom-and-pop, trying to wipe out the “little guy.” But it’s obvious that this wasn’t the case. If that were true, how on earth did we end up nearly 10 years later with so many people now posting that Google’s trying to wipe out that same class of business. Surely they were all killed in 2003 and never allowed to return?

    Google said about its most recent Penguin that webmasters would find it to be a “delight”. They shouldn’t have to wait a whole year for the chance to recover again. Even if it ends up costing businesses during the holidays, at least there’s a silver lining.

    Should Penguin’s roll-out been timed differently, or are you welcoming with open arms? Let us know in the comments.

    Image via YouTube