WebProNews

Tag: Secure Search

  • Is Google’s Paid Search Query Removal Worth Panicking About?

    Google announced that it is extending its secure search efforts to paid search, and that it will remove queries from referers on ad clicks originating from SSL searches on Google.com. In other words, the reason you’ve been seeing keywords “not provided” in Google Analytics now applies to Google ads.

    What do you think of Google’s decision to extend this to paid search? Let us know in the comments.

    A previous report had indicated that Google would eliminate data for third-parties, but as Larry Kim of Wordstream points out, paid seach query data “is not dead.”

    “Stop panicking,” he writes. “Google has been cracking down on who can access search query data for several years now in a few ways – enforcing terms of service on how the data may be used, and limiting access to a smaller number of third-party vendors who implement a required minimum functionality (RMF). Basically, in order to have access to the query data, you need to be a legit software company that has built a functioning AdWords management platform. If you were an SEO agency that used to have an AdWords API token, it’s probably been shut down over the last few years, and if it hasn’t already been shut down, it won’t last long. If Google was going to stop providing this data to all 3rd parties, then that would be new/surprising.”

    “Legit third-party AdWords management platforms (like WordStream, Marin, etc.) will continue to function as normal,” he adds. “Also, if you just use AdWords and no third-party platform, nothing has changed there either. Let’s not overstate the impact of this announcement.”

    So what did Google actually announce?

    “Advertisers will continue to have access to useful data to optimize and improve their campaigns and landing pages,” writes AdWords product management director Paul Feng. “For example, you can access detailed information in the AdWords search terms report and the Google Webmaster Tools Search Queries report.”

    “The AdWords search terms report (previously known as the search query performance report) lets you see search queries that generated ad clicks along with key performance data,” he adds. “And the Search Queries report available in Google Webmaster Tools provides aggregate information about the top 2000 queries, each day, that generated organic clicks.”

    For those using the query in the referer for generating reports or automated keyword management, Google now suggests using the AdWords API Search Query Performance Report or the AdWords Scripts Report Service.

    For those using the query in the referer for customizing landing pages, Google is suggesting using the keyword that generated the ad click rather than the query. The Keyword and match type, it notes, can be passed to your web server by using a ValueTrack parameter in your destination URLs.

    “We understand that some partners may need to make changes to their systems and operations, but we think that this is the right path forward for the security of our users searching on Google.com,” says Feng.

    It’s interesting that it has taken this long for Google to determine that this was the right path considering that Google started doing this with organic search like three years ago. Back in 2011, when Google rolled out secure search as the default for signed-in users, product manager Evelyn Kao wrote:

    What does this mean for sites that receive clicks from Google search results? When you search from https://www.google.com, websites you visit from our organic search listings will still know that you came from Google, but won’t receive information about each individual query. They can also receive an aggregated list of the top 1,000 search queries that drove traffic to their site for each of the past 30 days through Google Webmaster Tools. This information helps webmasters keep more accurate statistics about their user traffic. If you choose to click on an ad appearing on our search results page, your browser will continue to send the relevant query over the network to enable advertisers to measure the effectiveness of their campaigns and to improve the ads and offers they present to you.

    The company has often been criticized for an apparent double standard when it comes to secure search. It has always maintained that the changes were made to protect the privacy of users, but when people were paying for that information, well, that was different.

    Google actually hinted that such a change was on the horizon last month when Amit Singhal spoke at the Search Marketing Expo:

    He didn’t really help us to understand why Google has changed its mind, but he did acknowledge that the search ands ads teams had been talking to one another about the subject.

    Back in the fall, we looked at data from NotProvidedCount.com, which saw the rise of “not provided” queries for sixty sites at about 74%, on a steady increase:

    It’s risen even further since then. As of the time of this writing, it’s at over 80%.

    As far as paid search goes, it sounds like marketers, for the most part, aren’t panicking too much.

    “This impacts mostly those who don’t use those tools [those suggested by Google above] or who relied on basic Google Analytics and/or old fashion technology,” writes Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable.

    “It just means that people will have to start doing what they should have been doing all along,” writes Ryan Jones in a comment on a Search Engine Land post.

    Do you agree? Is Google making the right move by removing queries from referers on ad clicks? Let us know in the comments.

    Note: This article has been updated in light of further discussion.

    Image via NotProvidedCount.com

  • Google: Expect Announcement Related To ‘Not Provided’

    Google’s Amit Singhal had a discussion with Danny Sullivan on stage at SMX West on Tuesday evening. Danny has now shared a section of that (above) in which the controversial “not provided” subject comes up. Singhal says there may soon be an announcement related to some changes with that – specifically with how Google is currently handling this for organic vs. paid search.

    In case you have no idea what I’m talking about, Google implemented secure search a few years ago, and by doing so, it no longer provided publishers with the keywords searchers were using to find pages for those using it. It has, however, continued to show this data to advertisers.

    This fact has been brought up repeatedly (often by Sullivan), but Google hasn’t had a lot to say for itself, which is why these new comments from Singhal are pretty interesting. He said (via Sullivan):

    Over a period of time, we [Google’s search and ad sides] have been looking at this issue…. we’re also hearing from our users that they would want their searches to be secure … it’s really important to the users. We really like the way things have gone on the organic side of search.

    I have nothing to announce right now, but in the coming weeks and months as [we] find the right solution, expect something to come out.

    Just what “comes out” remains to be seen, but it seems unlikely that publishers will be getting those keywords back. More likely is that advertisers will lose the data.

    Image via YouTube

  • Yahoo Search Is Now Encrypted By Default

    Yahoo Search Is Now Encrypted By Default

    Yahoo has switched to secure search by default, meaning that the search traffic your analytics program is painting for you is even less complete than it already was.

    As you may recall, Google made this move a couple years ago for signed in users, and expanded it to even those who aren’t signed in last year. While good for consumers in that it makes their searching habits more private, it’s not so good for marketers, as the bulk of their Google referrals started being displayed with keywords “not provided”. It is no longer clear what search terms your visitors are using to find your pages, at least through Analytics. Google has continued to provide this information to advertisers and through Webmaster Tools.

    According to Danny Sullivan at MarketingLand, Yahoo’s version, doesn’t only hide the actual keywords searchers are using, but it disguises the referrals you get from Yahoo searches as “direct” traffic. In other words, you don’t even know that you’re getting Yahoo traffic.

    CEO Marissa Mayer announced in November that Yahoo would encrypt all information that moves between its data centers by the end of Q1. It turned on SSL/HTTPS encryption for Yahoo Mail earlier this month.

    Bing has also been messing around with secure search, though not to the extent of Google or Yahoo. Last week, news came out that Bing has made the option available, but has not enabled it as the default.

    Yahoo’s default secure search is apparently still in the process of rolling out.

    Image via Yahoo

  • Secure Search Is Now On Bing, But It’s Completely Optional For Now

    In September of last year, Google began to enable secure search for those who weren’t signed into a Google account. It was seemingly part of an effort to encrypt more of its traffic from the prying eyes of the NSA, but some felt that Google was only doing it to bring more people into its AdWords platform. At least you could always turn to Bing for unencrypted search, right?

    Search Engine Watch is reporting that Bing now offers secure search, but it’s entirely optional at this point. Those who visit Bing today will still get the unencrypted site by default. If you precede the web address with https://, however, you’ll be taken to the SSL encrypted Web site.

    Interestingly enough, it seems that Microsoft has yet to go the Google route by letting those signed into a Bing account toggle SSL search. Those who are signed into Bing only have unencrypted search for now. With SSL encryption seemingly on the way, however, it’s only a matter of time before Microsoft makes SSL the default for those signed into their accounts.

    All of this is a good thing from the consumer perspective as secure search helps to further protect the privacy of those who use the search platform. It’s not so good for webmasters and marketers as it makes it impossible for them to see keyword referral data. Bing knows that the loss of keyword referral data is a concern, and told Search Engine Watch that it’s keeping “the SEO/SEM community needs top of mind” while balancing “them with consumer privacy and security concerns.”

    What does that mean? Well, it probably means that Bing will encrypt search while directing webmasters to its Bing Ads platform. The same will probably hold true for Yahoo Search as it’s powered by Bing and Bing Ads as well. While it’s certainly good for Bing as more people will use its Bing Ads platform, it probably won’t sit well with webmasters still bitter over Google’s move to SSL.

  • Google Cranks Up ‘Not Provided’ Keywords, Says Ads Aren’t The Reason

    It looks like the percentage of keywords that are listed as “not provided” in your Google Analytics account is going to keep going up, as Google is reportedly moving to switch all users to secure search regardless of whether or not they’re signed in.

    Have you noticed an increase in the amount of keywords that are labeled as not provided? Let us know in the comments.

    As I’m sure you’ll recall, Google launched SSL Search on Google.com as the default for signed in users about two years ago, claiming it was a move to protect user privacy. This had an unfortunate side effect for webmasters, as it means that those searching with this experience do not have any keyword data to contribute. Google masks the search terms these people use under the “Not Provided” label, and for a lot of sites, this tends to account for the majority of their search traffic.

    Google still provides this kind of data in AdWords, however, and is often criticized for doing so. Some don’t believe Google’s more honorable sounding privacy reasoning, but rather that Google is simply doing this to increase its own revenue.

    In the early days of the feature, the percentage of queries labeled not provided was supposed to be somewhere around 1%. Reports shortly thereafter had it closer to 8%, with more recent accounts having the number ranging from 40% to 80%. Everyone pretty much seems to agree that the number has been increasing, and it looks like it may increase even more.

    Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Land reports that Google is making secure search the default for all Google users, sharing this statement from the company:

    We added SSL encryption for our signed-in search users in 2011, as well as searches from the Chrome omnibox earlier this year. We’re now working to bring this extra protection to more users who are not signed in.

    We want to provide SSL protection to as many users as we can, in as many regions as we can — we added non-signed-in Chrome omnibox searches earlier this year, and more recently other users who aren’t signed in. We’re going to continue expanding our use of SSL in our services because we believe it’s a good thing for users….The motivation here is not to drive the ads side — it’s for our search users.

    ClickConsult has a site called NotProvidedCount.com, which tracks the rise of “not provided” queries for sixty sites, and graphs the average (via Sullivan). There’s also a live counter, which as of the time of this writing is floating around 74%.

    Not Provided Count

    “Grouping a large number of keywords under the banner of (not provided) denies site owners fundamental information about how their site is performing in organic search,” the site says. “The percentage of (not provided) traffic Google is sending your site is steadily rising, and will one day hit 100%.”

    It certainly looks that way based on Google’s statement and the obvious trending increase.

    Google does still provide search terms in Webmaster Central, but as Sullivan noted in a recent article, it’s not great for historical data, though Google is increasing the timeframe. Historical data is not an issue in AdWords.

    Regardless of Google’s motive for moving to a full-on encrypted search experience for all users, it’s going to mean that keyword data in Google Analytics is going to become obsolete at worst, and much less helpful at best.

    This also comes after Google killed its popular Keyword Tool to get people to use its newer Keyword Planner product. A lot of webmasters/SEOs have been pretty perturbed by that too.

    A recent report from MarketLive found that merchants saw “significant changes” in the mix of paid/organic traffic. Paid search visits made up about a third of total search engine visits (up from 26% the previous year). Search visit growth slowed in the first six months of the year, but paid was up 30% while organic was down 3%.

    Do you think the “not provided” percentages will hit 100%? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Image: NotProvidedCount.com

  • Google Turns On Secure Search For Even Those Who Aren’t Signed Into A Google Account

    In early June, it was revealed that the NSA was working with a variety of tech companies to access information on foreign targets and Americans. Google and others named in the leak denied ever having provided unfettered access to their servers, but some Americans are not so trusting. Now Google is taking it a bit further.

    Search Engine Land reports that Google is now beginning to roll its encrypted secure search feature to more people. Previously, secure search was only available to those who were signed into their Google accounts or those searching from the Chrome omnibox. Now it’s working to make secure search the default for everybody – even those not signed into a Google account.

    Google’s latest move is certainly interesting in the context of its own actions against the NSA as well as recent leaks regarding the agency’s activities. For starters, Google has been at the very front of the campaign against the NSA with the search giant filing a lawsuit arguing that it has a First Amendment right to release the number of federal data requests it receives.

    Those federal data requests may include requests to see what people are searching for. The leaked PRISM slides from early June revealed that the NSA can collect “notifications of target activity” and “special requests,” both of which may involve searches, from the tech companies that are allegedly involved. If Google supplies encrypted searches to everyone, it may be able to slow down the pace at which the NSA can obtain search information from it.

    Of course, it may be all for naught as the NSA was recently revealed to have cracked a wide variety of commonly used Web encryption technologies. One such technology is SSL, and Google happens to use the very same tech to encrypt its search traffic. It doesn’t help that the agency may have worked with tech companies to install backdoors in their software, or worked with NIST to intentionally weaken international encryption standards. Both claims have been denied, but it’s hard to argue against leaks coming straight from the source.

    So, is Google encrypting search traffic for more people a worthless gesture? Not at all. In fact, it should help Google rebuild some of the trust that it’s no doubt lost in the wake of the NSA leaks. The big problem with this approach, however, is that it doesn’t address the elephant in the room. Can the NSA crack Google’s encrypted search? Google may not even know the answer to that, and it won’t be able to gain all of the trust its lost back until it does.

    [Image: Google]

  • Yahoo Has A New Search Deal With AVG

    Yahoo Has A New Search Deal With AVG

    Antivirus maker AVG announced on Thursday that it has formed a new Search and Distribution relationship with Yahoo. AVG’s Secure Search offering is now powered by Yahoo. This is interesting, considering that Yahoo’s own search is powered by Bing.

    AVG CEO JR Smith said, “AVG is excited to team up with Yahoo! to help provide Internet users with peace of mind when searching the web or accessing their favorite online properties. This relationship represents a shift from the company’s previous strategy of entering into exclusive search agreements in its search and advertising services business. Consumers have many choices when it comes to how they access the Internet, and our objective is simply to keep them secure, each step of the way.”

    Yahoo SVP of Connections Shashi Seth added, “Internet users everywhere want to be able to access online content easily without having to worry about security threats. We’re committed to providing a rich search experience to AVG users and see this relationship as a strategic way for us to enrich and broaden our search footprint moving forward.”

    AVG Secure Search is aimed at protecting people from “dangerous websites and online threats,” and utilizes the company’s LinkScanner technology. Here’s a bit more about the product from AVG’s site:

    AVG Secure Search alerts you before you visit dangerous webpages to make sure your identity, personal information, and computer are protected. In addition, our integrated AVG Do Not Track brings the control over your privacy back to you.

    AVG says it provides Intenet and mobile security to 143 million active users.

    According to the latest numbers from comScore, Yahoo’s share of the core search market in the U.S. is on the decline, dropping 0.1% year-over-year to 12.1%