WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • Bing Warns Searchers About Fake Online Pharmacies

    Bing Warns Searchers About Fake Online Pharmacies

    Bing is rolling out a new search feature that warns people who may be about to buy some bad medications.

    Online pharmacies offers customers cheaper, more available drugs – and this can be a dangerous combination. The Food and Drug Administration keeps a list of fake online pharmacies called the Internet Pharmacy Warning Letters, and Bing is using that to warn searchers when they travel to those sites.

    “When there is a significant risk of serious harm to the public from purchasing unsafe, counterfeit and other illegal drugs online, the Bing team wants to help our users make informed decisions. With this goal in mind, we are rolling out a new set of warnings on Bing.com to give our customers more information about the dangers of visiting unsafe online pharmacies,” says Bing.

    Here’s what you will see if you are trying to navigate to one of the sites on the FDA’s list:

    Screen Shot 2015-08-07 at 9.08.10 AM

    “The list of online pharmaceutical sites for which we are providing warnings will grow and evolve. We will continue to refine our efforts in this area and look for more opportunities to help our users make more well-informed decisions as additional, highly-reliable sources of information become available to us,” says Bing.

  • Is eBay Still Having Trouble With Google Traffic?

    Is eBay Still Having Trouble With Google Traffic?

    eBay may still be suffering from Google algorithm troubles. Back in May of 2014, Google eBay got hit hard in Google. It came around the same time as one of Google’s Panda updates, but reports indicated it was actually a manual penalty.

    When eBay reported its quarterly earnings the following July, it was revealed that the penalty cost the company big time.

    eBay CFO Bob Swan said during the company’s earnings call:

    Marketplaces delivered $2.2 billion in revenue, which grew 6%, GMV grew 8%, and operating margin declined 340 basis points. It was a challenging quarter. As John indicated, we got off to a good start, but we had significant obstacles late May.

    The combination of the cyberattack and the Google SEO had an immediate and dramatic impact on GMV growth. June GMV growth was 7% driven by slower active buyer growth and lower conversion. In light of these events, we have made significant investments to get eBay users reengaged, including couponing, seller incentives and increased marketing spend…

    He later indicated the “SEO changes” could take a while and “cost more” to recover from. The company reduced its full year revenue guidance by $200 million.

    Now, TameBay is reporting (citing data from Searchmerics) that eBay is still underperforming on Google a year later. Here’s the graph they show:

    ebay-searchmetrics

    “From the picture below it doesn’t look like a pretty story for eBay,” writes Kelvin Newman for TameBay. “A large dramatic drop in visibility followed by some small rebounds. This tool doesn’t capture all the keywords eBay might be ranking for. But does suggest they’re not getting the natural search traffic they once did, though.”

    “That might not be a big issue,” he adds. “Perhaps they’re getting more traffic from social or other channels. But it looks like natural search isn’t delivering the returns it used to. That’s still influenced by the manual downgrade last year. Google Panda likely also played a part.”

    Reduced visibility in Google isn’t good for anyone trying to sell products, and that certainly applies to eBay sellers. Sellers are also facing reported issues with eBay’s own search.

    Images via eBay, TameBay/Searchmetrics

  • Google Play Search Ads Now Available To All

    Google Play Search Ads Now Available To All

    Earlier this year, Google announced that it was expanding paid search advertising to the Google Play store. Given that people frequently go there to search for apps, this seemed like an obvious place for search ads, and it’s still surprising it’s taken Google this long to offer them to app makers.

    Better late than never though. Google has been testing the ads since February, but on Wednesday, announced a full roll-out to all advertisers and developers who use Search app install campaigns on AdWords.

    According to Google, Google Play reaches over a billion people on Android devices in over 190 countries, so there’s a lot of potential reach here.

    “Search Ads on Google Play can provide consumers new ways to discover apps that they otherwise might have missed and help developers drive more awareness of their apps,” says Surojit Chatterjee, Director of Product Management for Mobile Search Ads at Google.

    android-ads

    “As we expand the opportunities for developers to promote their apps, we’re also committed to providing conversion tracking tools that work seamlessly across channels and align with whichever measurement solution a developer chooses to use,” says Chatterjee. “That’s why we’re introducing Android first app opens, a new conversion tracking solution that measures when a user first opens an app after clicking on an ad and completing an Android app install. In addition to providing app conversion tracking across Search, Display and YouTube, this new solution also allows developers to better align the conversion volume they see in AdWords with the data they see in a third-party measurement solution. First app opens are the standard conversion type for third-party solutions, so we’re working with key partners like Tune, AppsFlyer, Kochava, Adjust and Apsalar to ensure data consistency and give developers the freedom to use reporting and optimization features across AdWords and third-party solutions of their choice.”

    Google says that Universal App Campaigns will soon (in the coming weeks) make it easier to promote apps on Google Play in addition to Google Search, YouTube, AdMob, and the Google Display Network.

    Images via Google

  • Google Tells Users When To Avoid Businesses

    Google Tells Users When To Avoid Businesses

    Google announced a new feature that tells users what the busiest times are at millions of places and businesses around the world. It’s basically using the same mobile technology that it uses to tell users about traffic to give them information that might make them want to reconsider visiting a business at certain times.

    Google explains in a Google+ update:

    Do you ever find yourself trying to avoid long lines or wondering when is the best time to go grocery shopping, pick up coffee or hit the gym (hint: avoid Monday after work)? You’re in luck!

    Now, you can avoid the wait and see the busiest times of the week at millions of places and businesses around the world directly from Google Search. For example, just search for “Blue Bottle Williamsburg”, tap on the title and see how busy it gets throughout the day. Enjoy your extra time!

    Here’s what the feature looks like:

    coffee2

    Google didn’t bother to mention how it’s acquiring the data needed for such a feature to work properly (and it remains to be seen if it really will work as advertised on any consistent basis), but the company told VentureBeat that it utilizes technology that it uses for its traffic information.

    Google has been offering aggregated traffic data since 2009. Here’s the blog post about that if you want a better understanding of how this works. Essentially, it just utilizes the locations of everybody’s phones. In that post, Google explains:

    When you choose to enable Google Maps with My Location, your phone sends anonymous bits of data back to Google describing how fast you’re moving. When we combine your speed with the speed of other phones on the road, across thousands of phones moving around a city at any given time, we can get a pretty good picture of live traffic conditions. We continuously combine this data and send it back to you for free in the Google Maps traffic layers.

    Now apply this to places and business locations, and you have a good idea of how Google is using the data.

    For users, it should be a helpful little feature that helps them make better decisions about when to go somewhere. The benefits aren’t quite as clear to businesses. A busy business could lose customers who are afraid of a potential crowd. The customer might decide to go somewhere else instead. Or in some cases, they might just shoot for a different time. Businesses who don’t get as big of crowds might benefit from the feature and steal away some customers from the competition.

    Either way it’s a helpful consumer feature, and one that will be interesting to see the effects of after some time has passed. Maybe we’ll see some studies on this down the line.

    Image via Google

  • Instagram Finally Brings Search To Web Interface

    Instagram Finally Brings Search To Web Interface

    Instagram announced on Monday that people can now search for people, places, and hashtags on the web. Finally.

    Instagram has always been a mobile-first service, and until now, the web experience has had little to offer beyond the user’s feed of content from accounts they follow, their own profiles, and the ability to interact with posts and grab their embed code.

    That changes today.

    Instagram launched a major overhaul of its search offerings on mobile last month. There’s a new Explore page with trending tags and places and a more powerful search experience making it easier for users to find people, places, and tags.

    Discovery has never been Instagram’s strong suit, but these changes went a long way toward fixing that. Search on the web interface should only help more.

    This is one of those features that comes along and makes you wonder what took so long. This seems like something that should have been built into the experience from the beginning, even if on a basic level. Either way, it’s here now, and Instagram will be all the more useful for it.

    It’s probably no coincidence that this new search functionality launches as Instagram prepares to ramp up its advertising offerings. This fall, businesss of all sizes will be able to get in on that.

    I’m not seeing the search functionality yet, so I assume it’s still in the process of rolling out.

    Related Reading: Here’s Why It’s Getting Harder To Ignore Instagram For Marketing

    Images via Instagram

  • Paid Search Spend Continues Strong Growth In U.S. Driven By Mobile Usage

    Paid Search Spend Continues Strong Growth In U.S. Driven By Mobile Usage

    IgnitionOne released its Q2 2015 Digital Marketing Report this week, highlighting data and trends in search, programmatic display, social, and mobile advertising. The company manages over $1.5 billion in digital spend and tracks over $30 billion in customer revenue.

    It found “strong” growth in paid search spend in the U.S. for the third consecutive quarter, up 22% year-over-year.

    Screen shot 2015-07-10 at 12.09.01 PM

    According to the findings, and not surprisingly, mobile search growth was the main driver of this paid search spend growth. Mobile phone spend in general was up 71% yearover-year. Growth for tablets was up 22%. Smartphones accounted for the greatest growth in mobile spend at 59% of spend compared to tablets.

    Screen shot 2015-07-10 at 12.10.16 PM

    “Despite gains in search market share made by Yahoo!/Bing in previous quarters, Google reclaimed much of its lost ground,” IgnitionOne says. “Google took in 75.5% of U.S. paid search spend, as opposed to Yahoo!/Bing’s 24.5%. The search giant was outpaced by Facebook in display growth, however, dropping -9% YoY compared to Facebook’s 48% growth in display spend.”

    Meanwhile, programmatic display grew 33%. This category has shown growth for two quarters. It did see a decrease in impressions thanks to Facebook changes.

    “As industry giants battle over market share it only serves to highlight how important it is for marketers and their technologies to be publisher-agnostic,” said IgnitionOne CEO Will Margiloff. “This report once again validates sophisticated marketers paying close attention to individual customers and delivering messages at the right time, efficiently, no matter what publisher or what device.”

    You can find the full report here.

    Images via IgnitionOne

  • Amazon Search Results Could Be ‘Confusing’ Says Court

    Amazon Search Results Could Be ‘Confusing’ Says Court

    If you head over to Amazon and search for MTM watches, you’ll find plenty of results … for Casio watches, Luminox watches, and Suunto watches. Amazon doesn’t sell MTM watches, yet it returns over 50 results for that search.

    According to MTM (Multi Time Machine Inc.) and now an appeals court, this could constitute a trademark violation.

    MTM, makers of military style watches, sued Amazon over their “misleading” search results and a federal judge ruled against them. Now, a US Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned that decision and says that the lawsuit should be allowed to proceed.

    From Reuters:

    MTM Special Ops are a military style model of watches which are not sold on Amazon’s web site, according to the court ruling. If an Amazon shopper searches for it, however, Amazon the site will not say it does not carry MTM products.

     

    Instead, Amazon displays MTM Special Ops in the search field and immediately below the search field, along with similar watches manufactured by MTM’s competitors for sale.

     

    MTM alleged this could cause customers to buy from one of those competitors, rather than encouraging the shopper to look for MTM watches elsewhere.

    The court agreed in a 2-1 decision. The dissenter who side with Amazon said that “no reasonably prudent consumer accustomed to shopping online would likely be confused as to the source of the products.”

    Indeed, Amazon clearly labels the maker of all products listed. But there’s no distinct indication that Amazon does not carry MTM products. In the watchmaker’s eyes, its brand value is being used to sell its competitor’s products.

    Amazon has faced this claim before. In the UK, cosmetics company Lush made the same argument and won. Now, when you search for “Lush” on Amazon, the company displays a big notice at the top that reads “We don’t sell Lush cosmetics.”

  • Yahoo Said To Show Google Results Instead Of Bing In Firefox

    Well, this is odd.

    Yahoo is reportedly displaying search results – both organic and paid – that are powered by Google when some users search using Mozilla’s Firefox web browser. That is according to Aaron Wall at SEOBook, who has screenshots comparing the usual Bing-powered version of results and the Google-powered ones.

    It’s completely unclear just how widespread this is occurring, whether it’s just a test, or whether this is something more users can expect to see.

    According to Wall, it’s only happening in some versions of Firefox. I’ve tested the most recent update to the browser on Mac, as well as Chrome and Safari, and have been unable to produce a Google–powered search results page by performing a Yahoo search. It’s all Bing for me so far. For the record, I did this using the “seo tools” query that Wall displays in his screenshots.

    It’s been an interesting period for search engines powering other services. There have been a lot of changes in the past year, and things are starting to get a bit convoluted.

    As you probably know, Yahoo and Microsoft have had a search and advertising partnership in place for many years. This came about after a Yahoo Google deal fell apart over antitrust concerns. Over the years, it became apparent that Yahoo wasn’t incredibly happy with the arrangement – particularly since ex-Googler Marissa Mayer took over as CEO.

    Earlier this year, however, the two companies amended their agreement. While some expected them to part ways, the companies decided to stay together, but under terms that are largely better for Yahoo, which gets increased flexibility to enhance its own search experience on any platform. The partnership is non-exclusive for both desktop and mobile. Yahoo will continue to serve Bing ads and search results for “most” (51%) of its desktop search traffic, it said, and can do whatever it wants on mobile.

    It can also do whatever it wants with that other 49% of desktop, which is presumably where these Google-powered results come in. We haven’t heard anything about any kind of arrangement between Yahoo and Google (who are already battling for the loyalty of Firefox users), but that doesn’t mean there isn’t an arrangement.

    In fact, the companies have expressed interest in working with one another even since Mayer has been running Yahoo. We’ve reached out to both companies for comment, and will update accordingly.

    Late last year, Mozilla and Yahoo announced a partnership that sees Yahoo take over the default search experience in Firefox in the U.S. – a spot that used to belong to Google. Since then, both Google and Yahoo have been employing various tactics to get users to select their respective search engines as their defaults.

    In the most aggressive instance of this yet, Yahoo entered a partnership with Oracle to prompt those downloading Java updates on Chrome and Internet Explorer to switch to Yahoo. This is a big deal considering that Java is the most popular programming language and Java software is reportedly installed on 89% of desktop computers.

    Making the search landscape even more complicated, this week also saw the announcement of a new long-term deal between Microsoft and AOL, which sees Bing taking over the Google-powered spot for AOL, which is now owned by Verizon.

    Update: Search Engine Land got a statement from Yahoo: “As we work to create the absolute best experiences for Yahoo users, from time to time, we run small tests with a variety of partners including search providers. There is nothing further to share at this time.”

  • What Marketers Should Know About The AOL-Bing Deal

    What Marketers Should Know About The AOL-Bing Deal

    Microsoft and AOL announced a major agreement which sees AOL assuming management and sales responsibilities for all of Microsoft’s display, mobile, and video ad inventory across the U.S., U.K., Canada, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan. AOL will run the ads across Microsoft’s MSN homepage and verticals, Outlook Mail, Xbox, Skype, and in apps.

    The two companies also made a ten-year global search and search advertising deal, which sees Bing power search for AOL (across all screens) starting at the beginning of next year.

    Will this deal have any impact on your approach to search marketing? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    “We have enjoyed a terrific relationship with Microsoft, and this expanded partnership is a win for both companies and our advertiser partners as our industry continues to rapidly transform and evolve,” said AOL President Bob Lord. “This collaboration further validates our leadership position in digital advertising and the shift to automation, while also allowing Microsoft to focus on what they do best: industry leading services and search innovation.”

    “This deal is further evidence of the quality of Bing results and the performance of the Bing Ads marketplace,” said Rik van der Kooi, Corporate Vice President at Microsoft. “And we will continue our focus on delivering world class consumer services and content and look forward to partnering with AOL to market them.”

    Bing controls 20% of the search market share in the U.S., and this will serve as a key partnership for growth. There hasn’t been much change in the market for several months. Google still has 64%.

    Google has been the search engine powering AOL search for many years, so this is another significant partner that Google is losing. It already lost Firefox (in the U.S.) to Yahoo.

    Danny Sullivan, who has been covering the search industry as long as anyone, recalls: “When Google first won the AOL deal back in 2002, it was a huge deal for that company. Google was still up-and-coming; AOL had substantial search traffic. Google managed to renew the deal every time it came up since, such as in 2010. But no more.”

    “That’s no great loss for Google, however,” he adds. “AOL has only about 1% of the search traffic in the US, versus Google’s 65%. Google will likely not notice the loss. Potentially, the company didn’t even fight for or hard to renew the deal. The loss even helps Google argue that it’s not as completely dominant in search as it’s often criticized for.”

    He still goes on to say that it’s a “great win for Bing”.

    To me, it doesn’t seem like anything that’s a great win for Bing should be downplayed too much for Google, particularly considering that it is losing other distribution partners, and Apple is moving further and further into its own universe.

    Keep in mind that as of last week, AOL is owned by Verizon, so there may be a lot of new opportunities for AOL to get its various offerings in front of more people. It’s not unthinkable that its search functionality, which will eventually be powered by Bing, could see an increase in usage.

    What Does This Mean for Marketers?

    More than anything, what the deal means for marketers is an increased distribution of their Bing marketing efforts. That goes for SEO and paid search efforts. Here’s a look at an AOL search results page right now:

    Screen shot 2015-06-30 at 10.04.12 AM

    It’s basically a Google results page with AOL’s logo and some minor cosmetic changes. You can easily imagine this as the Bing alternative.

    “Many Search advertisers are growing their audience reach by advertising on multiple publishers,” says Hoiling Wong at Marin Software. “While Google may still be the dominant force in the market, Bing is quickly growing. An April 2015 study conducted by Merkle | RKG shows that spend in Bing for Q1 2015 grew 36%, compared to Google’s 13%.”

    With a deal like this, it stands to reason that growth will only continue.

    “The extended reach combined with the controls within Bing Ads will give marketers opportunities to reach even more customers at the right ROI,” says Bing in a blog post about the AOL deal. “We’re excited about our partnership with AOL and will continue to evaluate additional partners to bring new opportunities to our customers.”

    Microsoft’s Bing Ads business is doing better than you probably thought. The company said this week that it’s a multibillion dollar business, and that it’s critical that it continues to monetize it. That means they’re going to focus on making Bing Ads better and more effective than ever, and with AOL handling the display ad duties, that should be easier for them to do.

    Those looking to drop their dollars on search ads look to Bing as the first alternative. That alternative is bound to become more attractive as time goes on.

    Do you expect to increase your Bing budget? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via Bing, AOL

  • Facebook Is Messing Around With Its Search Interface

    Update: It seems that this is all related to Facebook’s Trending topics. The addition of the News search option enables you to view search results basically in the format that Facebook already shows trending topics when you click on them. You see different types of results like: “In the Story,” “Friends and Groups,” “Articles,” etc.

    A Facebook spokesperson tells us, “We’re piloting a new way to discover Trending topics through Facebook Search.”

    It’s a small pilot running on desktop in US English for now. When people who are part of the pilot search for a topic that’s currently trending (either verbatim or with related keywords), they’ll see a link to that Trending topic page at the top of their search results.

    Facebook is messing around with its desktop search interface. In one version we’re seeing, it has changed the placement of the navigation for different search options on the results page and added a new “News” option.

    Here’s what the standard Facebook search results page looks like:

    Screen Shot 2015-06-29 at 3.54.53 PM

    Here’s the new version I’m currently seeing (with the News option):

    Screen shot 2015-06-29 at 4.00.48 PM

    The addition of “News” is the only the difference as far as I can tell. I’m a little surprised there’s not a Videos option considering the emphasis Facebook has been putting on video all year (including a new News Feed update).

    It’s unclear if this is a small test or if Facebook intends to push the change to all users. It’s most likely just a test for now. We’ve reached out to the company for comment, and will update accordingly.

  • Study Slams Google For ‘Reducing Social Welfare’ With ‘Lower Quality Results’

    Study Slams Google For ‘Reducing Social Welfare’ With ‘Lower Quality Results’

    Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu and Yelp collaborated on a study of Google’s search results, and have declared that Google is hurting the consumer experience of search results by favoring is own content which in some cases may be inferior to organic results that would otherwise be surfaced.

    The paper was presented at Oxford University’s Antitrust Enforcement Symposium, and comes as Google is in the process of preparing its response to antitrust action from the European Commission. Yelp, a vocal critic of Google from way back, is a complainant in that.

    The study makes use of search results as demonstrated by a tool Yelp launched last year called “Focus on the User – Local“. This is a browser plugin, which claims to demonstrate how Google manipulates its results for the worse by removing the biased element.

    The study surveyed nearly 2,700 people utilizing the results.

    “While Google is known primarily as a search engine, it has increasingly developed and promoted its own content as an alternative to results from other websites,” the paper says. “By prominently displaying Google content in response to search queries, Google is able to leverage its dominance in search to gain customers for this content. This yields serious concerns if the internal content is inferior to organic search results. To investigate, we implement a randomized controlled trial in which we vary the search results that users are shown – comparing Google’s current policy of favorable treatment of Google content to results in which external content is displayed. We find that users are 45% more likely to engage with universal search results (i.e. prominently displayed map results on Google) when he results are organically determined. This suggests that by leveraging dominance in search to promote its internal content, Google is reducing social welfare – leaving consumers with lower quality results and worse matches.”

    Here’s the full report, uploaded by Yelp’s Luther Lowe:

    It shouldn’t surprise anyone to see Yelp putting out such a report, but Wu on the other hand, said in the past that “Google was pretty clean.” This was in the aftermath of an FTC settlement a couple years back.

    He wrote this in January of 2013: “What saved the company weren’t the millions Google wasted lobbying Senators or paying Republicans to be its friends. It was its engineers, who designed its services in a way that maximized effectiveness while avoiding rampant illegality.”

    “Google just didn’t have this kind of blood on its hands, at least at this point in its history,” he later wrote in the same column. “Yes, Google had made decisions that its competitors didn’t like, but ultimately American law favors an improved product over the protection of failed competitors; that is the standard that the FTC is obliged to adhere to. And with some exceptions mentioned above, Google’s engineers generally produced products that beat its competitors on the merits. Ultimately, it is not the job of the Federal Government to try and convince people to use Bing.”

    Wu has some significantly different things to day now, however. From Re/code:

    “When the facts change, your thinking should change,” Wu told Re/code about the evolution of his stance. “The main surprising and shocking realization is that Google is not presenting its best product. In fact, it’s presenting a version of the product that’s degraded and intentionally worse for consumers.”

    He added: “This is the closest I’ve seen Google come to [being] the Microsoft case.”

    Google isn’t commenting on the study’s findings.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Adds Pinterest Carousel To Search Results

    Google Adds Pinterest Carousel To Search Results

    Google has just given content marketers another reason to make sure Pinterest is a part of their strategies. Now, when users search for Pinterest content on Google from a mobile device, it will display a carousel-style section on the search results page letting them swipe through various content from Pinterest before clicking through to the app or mobile site.

    Here, you can see how Google displays results for “4th of July ideas Pinterest”:

    Pinterest on the 4th

    The carousel appears in the middle of the results page for that particular query. On others it appears right at the top. Interestingly, it will also display multiple Pinterest carousels if it thinks ore than one collection is relevant. Behold the results for “flamin hot cheetos recipes”:

    cheetos

    That shot actually shows results further down on the page. “Flamin hot” Cheetos recipes were actually at the top.

    It’s worth considering that optimizing for Pinterest can potentially lead to more visibility in Google search, which is surely a welcome bonus.

    The Pinterest carousel is actually just one new integration of this type Google is now including. It’s including similar results from Vine, Houzz, and Food Network.

    “Whether you are looking for Pinterest pins, Vines, Houzz idea books or Food Network recipes, you can now browse through more content from your favorite websites within Google search results on your mobile device,” Google said in a Google+ update. “Simply swipe through links within a carousel and tap any link to read or watch exactly what you are interested in.”

    These results are similar to a feature for news sites Google announced in February.

    Images via Google

  • Yahoo Tries Another Aggressive Tactic To Get People To Change Default Search

    Yahoo Tries Another Aggressive Tactic To Get People To Change Default Search

    Yahoo is pretty serious about trying to get users to choose its search engine as their default experience. Since last fall, we’ve seen the company try a variety of strategies. Now, they’re even trying to get people to switch to Yahoo when they…install Java updates.

    That’s the word form The Wall Street Journal, which reports that the company announced a partnership with Oracle that will see users (starting this month) who install or update Oracle’s Java software getting prompted to make Yahoo the default search for their web browser. This is a big deal considering that Java is the most popular programming language and Java software is reportedly installed on 89% of desktop computers.

    The Journal shares a screenshot of what users will see, which is a dialog box prompting them to “Get the best of the web with Yahoo” with a checkbox to “Set Yahoo as your homepage and default search engine on Chrome and Internet Explorer, plus get Yahoo as your new tab page on Chrome.”

    It continues: “By clicking “Next” and accepting Yahoo Search offerings, your use is subject to the Yahoo Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. De-selecting the checkbox above declines these optional search offers and proceeds with the rest of the install process.”

    So you’ll even have to uncheck the pre-checked box to avoid having Yahoo take over your browser.

    A Yahoo spokesperson told the publication, “We have definitely made sure that our onboarding process is one that is highly transparent and gives users choice.”

    This is only the latest in a series of movies Yahoo has made to try and increase its users through the changing of their default browser search experiences. As you probably know, Yahoo became the default experience in Firefox in the U.S. through a deal with Mozilla.

    Since then, it has displayed a link at the top of its homepage telling visitors to “Upgrade to the new Firefox” if they’re using another browser such as Chrome.

    We recently found that they were emailing users to tell them to “stay secure & protected across the web” by downloading Firefox. These emails said nothing of search, and were all about how Firefox is “loaded with features that protect your personal information and keep you safe online.”

    These were sent by Yahoo. Not Mozilla.

    Google has responded to some of Yahoo tactics by also trying to convince Firefox users to switch back. I’d imagine that as Yahoo continues its aggressiveness, Google will likely ramp up its own. This is an interesting battle to watch for sure.

    Lead image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Instagram Just Made Some Big Content Discovery Improvements

    Instagram Just Made Some Big Content Discovery Improvements

    Instagram just announced two major improvements in an area where it’s been severely lacking for its entire existence – discovery. There’s a new Explore page with trending tags and places and a more powerful search experience making it easier for users to find people, places, and tags.

    Instagram says it sees over 70 million photos and videos posted every day. As this rapid content sharing continues, discoverability will only be increasingly important. It should also help businesses with their Instagram marketing strategies.

    The new Explore experience (pictured above) includes trending tags and places as they emerge in real time.

    “Through trending Tags and trending Places, you can experience moments like #bonnaroo or #fathersday from every perspective,” Instagram says in a blog post. “Rich visual content captures everyone’s unique take — not just what the community is talking about, but also what they’re doing and seeing.”

    The trends are frequently refreshed based on what’s popular at the moment. If you’ve enabled location services on your phone, it may show you places nearby.

    There are collections at the top of the Explore page, which feature interesting accounts and places in various categories:

    Screen shot 2015-06-23 at 1.39.20 PM

    The content in the collections is editorially chosen by Instagram. They choose new topics to feature twice a week that it thinks the larger Instagram community will like.

    The company says it’s always working to update the types of photos and videos it shows in Search & Explore to better tailor it for users, and may show photos liked by people whose posts the user has liked or posts that are liked by a large number of people. Note that just because you see a post in Search & Explore doesn’t mean everyone else is seeing it.

    Here’s a look at the new search experience:

    instagram-search

    “For everyone on Instagram, we’ve dramatically improved the ability to find what you’re looking for,” the company says. “With the new Places Search, you can now peer in at just about any location on earth, allowing you to scout out your next vacation spot in the South Pacific, get a look inside that hot new restaurant or experience your favorite music festival — even if you couldn’t make it this year. The new Top Search also lets you search across people, places and tags all at once.”

    The new features are available in updates to the iOS and Android apps. It’s unclear if and when they’ll come to the web experience. The new Explore will only be available in the U.S. for now, but will launch in more countries eventually.

    Various studies have shown that businesses are somewhat slow to adopt Instagram, but those who do are more likely to see better engagement (compared to Facebook) and/or a faster increase in followers.

    Images via Instagram

  • Google Adds Revenge Porn to Short List of Things It Removes from Search Results

    Google’s philosophy about what it surfaces in its search results has always been pretty laissez-faire. For the most part, Google prefers to “organize the world’s information” and “reflect the whole web”. To that end, Google only removes content from search on very limited occasions. Just ask Rick Santorum.

    Today, however, Google is adding another specific type of content to the small list of things it will not tolerate – revenge porn.

    “Our philosophy has always been that Search should reflect the whole web. But revenge porn images are intensely personal and emotionally damaging, and serve only to degrade the victims—predominantly women. So going forward, we’ll honor requests from people to remove nude or sexually explicit images shared without their consent from Google Search results. This is a narrow and limited policy, similar to how we treat removal requests for other highly sensitive personal information, such as bank account numbers and signatures, that may surface in our search results,” says Amit Singhal, SVP of search, in a blog post.

    Upon request, Google will remove financial and government-issued identification numbers. This includes U.S. Social Security numbers, bank accounts, credit card numbers, and images of people’s signatures. There’s a checklist that any particular piece of sensitive information must satisfy before Google will consider removing it from search results.

    Google’s policy states that it’ll only remove images or videos from results if they include personal information as described above, or if it’s child porn.

    Now we can add revenge porn to the list.

    “We know this won’t solve the problem of revenge porn—we aren’t able, of course, to remove these images from the websites themselves—but we hope that honoring people’s requests to remove such imagery from our search results can help,” says Google.

    The company says a dedicated removal request form should pop up in the coming weeks.

    In recent months, companies like Twitter and reddit have also implemented revenge porn bans.

  • Someone Made A Comic About Matt Cutts And His Leave

    Someone Made A Comic About Matt Cutts And His Leave

    Ignite Visibility President John Lincoln, who contributes to Search Engine Land on occasion, created a comic about Matt Cutts and his leave from Google. I hate to spoil it, but on the other hand, I don’t really care. It turns out that John Mueller has really been Matt Cutts all along.

    Last July, Cutts announced he was taking leave from Google. It was originally supposed to last at least through October. At the time, he wrote on his personal blog:

    I wanted to let folks know that I’m about to take a few months of leave. When I joined Google, my wife and I agreed that I would work for 4-5 years, and then she’d get to see more of me. I talked about this as recently as last month and as early as 2006. And now, almost fifteen years later I’d like to be there for my wife more. I know she’d like me to be around more too, and not just physically present while my mind is still on work.

    So we’re going to take some time off for a few months. My leave starts next week. Currently I’m scheduled to be gone through October. Thanks to a deep bench of smart engineers and spam fighters, the webspam team is in more-than-capable hands. Seriously, they’re much better at spam fighting than I am, so don’t worry on that score.

    At the end of October, Cutts revealed in a tweet that he was extending his leave into 2015:

    In November, Cutts made some comments on a web chat show indicating that he might be interested in doing different work at Google when he decides to go back to work.

    While Cutts has been away, the webmaster community has mostly heard from Mueller, at least when it comes to addressing Google webmasters issues in videos, which Cutts used to do on a regular basis. Here’s the comic:

    Where is Matt Cutts? – SEO Comic Book – An infographic by the team at Where is Matt Cutts? – SEO Comic Book

    In reality, Google said last month that it has someone new in the Matt Cutts position of head of web spam, but that this person won’t be “the all-around spokesperson” that Cutts was, so they’re not naming who it is.

    Over on Search Engine Roundtable, Schwartz is telling people to stop harassing Mueller because it’s getting “disgusting”. Apparently a lot of people are being pretty nasty to him. I guess he did get to take Matt’s place in that department.

  • What is the Most Effective SEO Tactic?

    What is the Most Effective SEO Tactic?

    What is the Most Effective SEO Tactic? If you’re trying to gain visibility for your website, you’ve no doubt wondered about the answer to that question at some point. Well, it just happens to be the very thing that Google keeps telling you. It’s about the content.

    What has been your most effective SEO-related tactic? Discuss in the comments.

    Google has long been pushing webmasters to shoot for high quality content, especially since launching the Panda update several years ago. According to a recent survey by Ascend2 (via Marketing Charts), relevant content creation is by far the most effective tactic. That’s what 72% of SEO marketers say. This is followed by keyword/phrase research, frequent website updating, relevant link building, social media integration, frequent blogging, mobile search optimization, and website URL restructuring.

    seo-tactics

    The bad news is that relevant content creation is also one of the most difficult tactics, according to those polled, second only to relevant link building (which has become much more challenging in recent years due to developments at Google). A fair amount of those surveyed also find frequent blogging and website updating to be difficult tasks. Keyword/phrase research is the easiest thing to do.

    difficult-tactics

    The good news is that for 71% of those polled, the effectiveness of search engine optimization tactics is improving. It’s mostly modest improvement, but that’s compared to no change for 18%, modest worsening for 9% and significant worsening for just 2%.

    This is somewhat surprising given Google’s changes that put less emphasis on traditional, organic results.

    It’s unfortunate that relevant link building is the most difficult tactic because another new study suggests that links are as important as ever to ranking in Google.

    Moz is sharing some data based on the top 50 Google search results for about 15,000 keywords. Cyrus Shepard reports:

    The correlation between higher rankings and the number of linking websites (root domains) sits at .30. This number seems small, but it’s actually one of the highest correlations the study found. (Smaller correlations are also not surprising—with over 200 ranking signals, Google specifically designed their algorithm so that one factor doesn’t dominate the others.)

    Even more telling is the number of websites we found in the top results that had external backlinks, or rather, the lack thereof.

    Out of the top results, a full 99.2% of all websites had at least one external link. (The remaining .8% is well within the margin of error expected between Mozscape and Google’s own link index.) The study found almost no websites ranking for competitive search phrases that didn’t have at least a single external link pointing at them, and most had significantly more links.

    google-links

    Check out the full report for additional insights.

    Earlier this year, Google said that you should avoid link building.

    Google webmaster trends analyst John Mueller was asked in a hangout if link building is, in any way, good for webmasters (start at about 55:40):

    He said, “That is a good question. In general, I’d try to avoid that. So that you are really sure that your content kind of stands on its own and make it possible for other people of course to link to your content. Make it easy, maybe, put a little widget on your page, if you like this, this is how you can link to it. Make sure that the URLs on your web site are easy to copy and paste. All of those things make it a little bit easier. We do use links as part of our algorithms but we use lots and lots of other factors as well. So only focusing on links is probably going to cause more problems for your web site that actually helps.”

    After that, we spoke with prominent link building specialist Ken McGaffin about his thoughts on Google saying to avoid link building. He said:

    That all depends on the type of link building you’re doing. Let’s say I’ve just conducted a great piece of research for a client and my prime objective is to get them media coverage. The research and the accompanying press release was so good that it got coverage in the NYTimes, BBC and many others – good job done!

    But my secondary objective is to get links – so AS WELL as conducting the research, and writing the press release, I make sure that the journalist has something to link to, something that his readers will appreciate. That could be:

    – an in-depth blog post giving much more detail than the Journalist could give space to

    – a presentation or infographic of the results

    – a copy of the original research so that readers can check it out.

    In this case, I’m doing my client a service in getting PR coverage. But I’m also doing my best to ensure that editorial links and others links will follow. I can only see Google looking positively on my efforts – because of the value it offers. But if all I did was the ‘link building’ part then I’d be doing my client a disservice – and missing some major opportunities. This means that any online marketing/PR initiative is multi-layered – and one of those layers must be link building.

    Google has made it clear that it will not tolerate any link building that violates its guidelines, and it’s become as aggressive at going after sites that do as ever.

    It’s good to know that creating relevant content is still leading to significant effectiveness. Luckily, if you’re producing the right content, the links should come too. Look for ways to put out content that others aren’t creating. If others are creating similar things, look for ways to make your version better and more helpful.

    Do you have trouble creating relevant content? Building links? What’s the most difficult tactic for you? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via Ascend2

  • Pinterest Search Gets Smarter Again Thanks To These 5 New Features

    Pinterest is generally thought of as a visual social network, but the company has been trying to shed that image. It wants people to think of its product as being about the users themselves rather than the user’s friends. While there is certainly a social element, and the content is coming from other people – often people you’re following – Pinterest really is about finding stuff you’re personally interested in. Even the name “Pinterest” utilizes this concept.

    Search is very key to finding things you’re interested in, and Pinterest has made tremendous strides over the years in this area. Last year it released Guided Search, which was a complete overhaul of the search experience, enabling users to search for keywords with helpful add-on keyword suggestions “guiding” them down the right path until they find what they’re looking for.

    It works very well, and Bing is even copying the approach with its image search.

    Now Pinterest is rolling out what it calls “a streamlined search experience” across platforms.

    “Since launching Guided Search last year, an increasing number of people are searching for creative ideas on Pinterest (searches up 30%), and today we’re launching 5 improvements to make Pinterest search even smarter,” a spokesperson for Pinterest tells WebProNews.

    1. Typeahead

    The first one is a new typeahead experience in search. As the company explains, before when users searched, results were segmented behind filters. With the new update, they’ll see faster typeahead results, pinners and boards as soon as they start typing.

    New Pinterest search

    2. Filters

    There are also new filters. There’s a new button to refine searches by pins, pinners, boards, and your own pins, which should make it much easier to find what you’re looking for.

    Pinterest search filters

    3. Autocorrect

    They’ve also added autocorrect so it will start showing what it thinks you’re looking for if you spell something wrong. According to the spokesperson, about 12% of searches on Pinterest have spelling errors.

    “Early results show that over twice as many people are finding more boards and Pinners to follow in the new search experience, and Pinners are more than 50% more likely to repin or click through a Pin when their search is corrected with the new autocorrect,” they tell WebProNews.

    4. Trending Searches

    When the user first taps on the search feature, they’ll be presented with a new Trending Searches feature along with their recent searches. This provides a look at daily trends on Pinterest.

    Pinterest search trends

    5. Verified Accounts

    Finally, search will now display indication of verified accounts. A check mark will be displayed next to verified results.

    verified accounts

    Additionally…

    Pinterest is always working on ways to make it easier for users to discover pins. Last month, the company showed off some experiments it’s been working on with object recognition and real-time related pin recommendations.

    It’s also been working on something called Flashlight, which lets users click a button at the top of the screen, crop any part of an image, and in real time, get search results on the right side.

    You can see it demonstrated here:

    According to the presenter, that’s just the tip of the iceberg of the kinds of things they’re working on.

    As you’re probably aware, Pinterest recently announced Buyable Pins, which will let uses buy items right from Pinterest.

    Between that and the still young Promoted Pin ads, it’s as important as ever to Pinterest and advertisers that users have good search and discovery features. Luckily, it should also help for organic referrals. Pinterest is the second leading driver of social media traffic to websites.

    Images via Pinterest

  • Google Now Displays Fast Food Nutritional Info

    Google has displayed nutritional information in search results for about two years now – making it easy for you to quickly pull up the calorie counts for a head of cauliflower, or a bunch of grapes, for instance.

    Now, Google is expanding this to include nutritional info on popular fast food items.

    If you search “calories in big mac”, for example, here’s what you’ll see:

    Screen Shot 2015-06-16 at 11.26.51 AM

    Searching a more generic phrase like “calories in McDonald’s” will put up a scroll box of all the fast food chain’s menu items, complete with calorie counts.

    Screen Shot 2015-06-16 at 11.29.20 AM

    Right now this only works for a handful of restaurant chains inside the Google app, as well as on desktop search.

  • Vine Gets Search Improvements

    Vine Gets Search Improvements

    Twitter seems to be much more interested in giving its users a better search experience these days. It recently launched a revamped search experience for Twitter.com.

    Now its Vine mobile apps are getting a search upgrade. The company announced today that you’ll now be able to go to the explore tab, enter a word, phrase, or account, and get actual vines, as opposed to just hashtags and people results.

    “Head over to the Explore tab and enter a word, phrase or account – like #6secondcover, pugs or lele pons. In addition to searching people and tags, you can also choose to watch either top or recent posts as you scroll through a feed of Vines,” says software engineer Sergey Grankin on the Vine blog.

    The new search will only be available on iOS at first. It will be rolling out over the course of the coming weeks. It will also be available on Android soon, according to Grankin.

    Improved Vine search means it will be easier for people to find interesting content on the service, and that’s good for content creators. Anything that makes its services more appealing to users and content creators has to be good for Twitter, which continues to struggle with user growth and pleasing shareholders.

    Image via Vine

  • Flashlight For Pinterest Will Be An Awesome Search Feature If It Launches

    Noted Pinterest marketer Vincent Ng (whom we recently spoke with about Pinterest marketing tactics) is pointing out that Pinterest is testing a new feature called Flashlight for Pinterest, which he says “will change the way that Pinterest works and the world of visual search discovery”.

    The company quietly announced the feature at a conference back in February, and Ng thinks its still in the alpha stage of testing. We reached out to the company for more info, but they didn’t have much to say about it.

    A spokesperson told us, “As mentioned in the visual search announcement a few weeks ago, we’re experimenting with many different uses for visual discovery technology, but it’s too early to share any further details.”

    The announcement the spokesperson is referring to deals with experiments Pinterest is doing with real-time related pin recommendations and object recognition. More on this here.

    So what is Flashlight? You can actually get a look at it in this video from Pinterest Engineering toward the end at about an hour and twenty-six minutes in:

    As demonstrated, you can click the flashlight feature at the top of the screen and crop any part of an image, and in real time, it displays search results on the right side. It’s pretty cool.

    According to the presenter, that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Very interesting stuff on the horizon from Pinterest as it moves toward more of a shopping experience.

    In other Pinterest news, the company just announced expanded gender options and will soon roll out Buyable Pins.