WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • Yahoo Adds Blog Search to Search BOSS

    Yahoo Adds Blog Search to Search BOSS

    Yahoo announced today that it has added Blog Search (in beta) to Yahoo Search BOSS, the company’s “Build Your Own Search Service” open search and data platform.

    “Developers looking for a blog search API often find the APIs that do exist are providing a variation of a web index,” says Rahul Hampole with the Yahoo Search BOSS team. “We decided to take a different approach. Yahoo! developed a custom blog index where the relevancy is specifically tuned for blogs. This allows us to provide you a wealth of data such as the provider, the author, date of post and in certain cases, contextually relevant terms associated with the article.”

    “By their very nature, web indices used for blog search cannot provide the complex functionality that developers demand,” explains Hampole. “For example, try finding a commercial API that will give you all the blog articles written on ‘Yahoo’ in the last week sorted by date. Yes, I know, I couldn’t find one either. Developers can now make that exact query on BOSS and build a rich powerful application. As always, BOSS developers get maximum flexibility on the display of this data.”

    Yahoo has set the pricing at ten cents per 1,000 queries. Users can apply to show advertising when they sign up, and those who have already signed up for BOSS can use Blog Search immediately.

    Yahoo says it has hundreds of developer sites using BOSS for millions of queries each day. ” We have seen fascinating applications in social, mobile and on the web that are using the service,” says Hampole. “Our goal is to nurture and grow this ecosystem by continuing to add new services and helping you monetize your offering.”

    He says the team’s next goal is to “shake things up in mobile,” adding that they’re not planning on a BOSS OS.

    Earlier this year, Yahoo launched BOSS v2, which brought a number of new things to the table (including Yahoo Search advertising).

  • Google Refreshes Spam Reporting

    Google’s head of web spam Matt Cutts tweeted that the company has refreshed its spam report form. He calls it the biggest refresh in 10 years.

    Side note: It’s worth pointing out that he used Twitter to announce this. I see no updates about it in his posts on Google+. This is the kind of thing that makes Twitter essential to Google’s realtime search feature, and why Google+ has a long way to go before it can serve as a useful replacement for it. Even Googlers are still relaying important information via Twitter. It looks like he hasn’t posted to Google Buzz since May 28, either, btw. But that’s another story.

    We just released the biggest refresh of our spam report form in, oh, say 10 years: http://t.co/ty2MxmN 16 hours ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto

    Here’s what the new spam report form looks like:

    Spam report form

    The page says, “‘Webspam’ refers to pages that try to trick Google into ranking them highly. Before you file a webspam report, see if the page might have a different problem.” Users are then presented with options for:

    • Paid Links (the page is selling or buying link)
    • Objectionable content (the page is inappropriate)
    • Malware (the page is infected)
    • Other Google products (This page abuses Google products other than Search, e.g., AdSense, Google Maps, etc.)
    • Copyright and other legal issues (This page should be removed under applicable law).
    • Personal/private (This page discloses private information)
    • Phishing (This page is trying to get sensitive information)
    • Something else is wrong (This page has other, non-webspam related issues)
    • And finally an option that says “This page is really webspam. Report webspam”

    Each option will take you to a different form or information source about how to proceed from there.

    Google’s approach seems to have ruffled at least one feather. “Marketing Guy” Scott Boyd talks about the new form, saying:

    Let’s see. Google crushes legitimate business websites in an attempt to remove spam from the index. Google crushes competition by undercutting them left, right and centre (analytics market is pretty much stagnent and frankly Adense just promotes lazy webmasters who’d rather take some easy bucks than work at their business). Oh and is quite happy to take vast amounts of our information without mentioning how valuable it actually is too loudly

    And now they want us – that’s the webmaster community (because frankly, no one else cares about paid links – in fact most normal people probably find the idea ridiculous) – to hunt down some evil paid linkers!!

    I already give you my search data, browsing history and patterns via Google toolbar, metrics on the quality of my websites via Google Adsense (for a minute fee), traffic metrics via Google Analytics, an idea of my financials, budgets and target market via Google Adwords. And now you want ME to improve YOUR product.for FREE?

    I think not.

    Eric Enge at Stone Temple Consulting recently posted an interview with Tiffany Oberoi, an engineer on Google’s Search Quality team. Cutts said, “Every SEO/search person should read” it. She talks about how reconsideration requests work.

    Now that Google has refreshed its spam reporting, I’m guessing we’re going to see a whole lot more reporting, and of course a whole lot more of such requests. Here are some key quotes from Oberoi from that interview:

    “We do have a few different manual actions that we can take, depending on the type of spam violation. We would tend to handle a good site with one bad element differently from egregious webspam. For example, a site with obvious blackhat techniques might be removed completely from our index, while a site with less severe violations of our quality guidelines might just be demoted. Instead of doing a brand name search, I’d suggest a site: query on the domain as a sure way to tell if the site is in our index. But remember that there can be many other reasons for a site not being indexed, so not showing up isn’t an indication of a webspam issue.”

    “We try to take an algorithmic approach to tackling spam whenever possible because it’s more scalable to let our computers scour the Internet, fighting spam for us! Our rankings can automatically adjust based on what the algorithms find, so we can also react to new spam faster.”

    “And just to be clear, we don’t really think of spam algorithms as “penalties” — Google’s rankings are the result of many algorithms working together to deliver the most relevant results for a particular query and spam algorithms are just a part of that system. In general, when we talk about “penalties” or, more precisely, “manual spam actions”, we are referring to cases where our manual spam team stepped in and took action on a site.”

    “If a site is affected by an algorithmic change, submitting a reconsideration request will not have an impact. However, webmasters don’t generally know if it’s an algorithmic or manual action, so the most important thing is to clean up the spam violation and submit a reconsideration request to be sure. As we crawl and reindex the web, our spam classifiers reevaluate sites that have changed. Typically, some time after a spam site has been cleaned up, an algorithm will reprocess the site (even without a reconsideration request) and it would no longer be flagged as spam.”

    She goes on to point out that reconsideration requests will not help you if you’ve been impacted by the Google Panda update.

  • Video and Images Dominate Google Universal Search Results

    Video and Images Dominate Google Universal Search Results

    Searchmetrics has released a new study showing how universal search can help marketers in search visibility. This certainly isn’t a groundbreaking concept. We’ve discussed this plenty in the past, but the firm shares universal search data, which it has used to try and identify which sites are dominating the top 10 positions of video, news, shopping, images, and map results.

    The study is based on the analysis of th top 100 search engine results displayed by Google for a database of about 28 million search terms over a four-month period, Searchmetrics says. The timeframe was February to May.

    Video results appeared in over 60% of all searches where universal search results are included in the top 100 listings.  Images (coming in second behind videos) appeared in 30%, followed by shopping results at about 20% and news at around 10%. Judging from the following graph, it looks like Books were ahead of news, before dropping off in April.

    Searchmetrics data on universal search

    “For a few years now Google has been bringing specific shopping, news, image, video, blog and map-based results into the general search listings it presents to searchers as part of what has been termed its ‘universal search’ strategy – it’s intended to help searchers find what they’re looking for more easily,” said Searchmetrics CEO Dr Horst Joepen. “We found that video and images are highly visible in Google searches when compared with other types of universal search content. So it makes sense for marketers to increase the volume of video and image content they’re creating and to optimize it both on their own sites and on third party sites such as YouTube and Flickr.”

    “Interesting videos and images aren’t just good for your SEO, they’ll obviously also help make your site more engaging for visitors,” added Dr Joepen.

    He says marketers should be thinking about creating things like client testimonials, interviews and product demos for video content.

    Google has not made things easy on SEOs over the years. They are always changing so many things, it’s hard to keep up. Add Google’s personalization into the mix, and you never know who’s going to see what in their results for any given query.

    Universal search, though surely not its intended reason for existence, has proven to be something of a bone Google has thrown to websites. It’s a shortcut to from page search results. If you can rank well for videos or images, for example, there’s a good chance you will find your way onto the front page of Google’s web results for some searches.

  • Google Realtime Search Will Be Back, Google+ Search in the Works

    Last month, Google’s Realtime Search feature went away. This was the result of Google and Twitter failing to come to terms on Google’s use of the Twitter firehose, which allowed Google to tap into tweets in realtime.

    Twitter did not make up the entirety of Google’s realtime search. There were other sources in the mix, including Google Buzz, public Facebook updates, blogs, etc. However, Twitter was clearly the most valuable source. It has pretty much become the go-to place on the web for realtime updates about anything. Facebook is much bigger, but a much larger percentage of Twitter updates are public, making them an accessible source of up to the second information. Pretty useful when you’re trying to organize the world’s information, I would think.

    Without tweets in Google’s realtime search, people seeking this realtime information will just be more inclined to go to Twitter Search (which was recently improved). I wouldn’t think it would be in Google’s best interest to for people to go elsewhere for any kind of search, but that’s what’s happening. I know I’m finding myself visiting Twitter Search more often now.

    Twitter Search

    Apparently Google didn’t want to fork out enough money to organize that part of the world’s information, at least for the time being.

    Ben Parr at Mashable, covering a search panel in Mountain View, where Google’s Amit Signhal spoke, reports that Singhals said “The value the product was providing was not enough,” in regards to Realtime Search without a steady flow of tweets – hence the feature’s removal. According to Parr, he also said, however, that Google is “actively working” on bringing the feature back, and that they’re experimenting with adding data from Google+ and other sources.

    The addition of Google+ would be no surprise, but will that (along with these unnamed “other sources”) be enough to make up for the lack of tweets? Well, I guess that depends on just how much Google+ takes off.

    Many users have already suggested that Google+ has eaten into their Twitter time, but in my experience, Google+ hasn’t come even close to Twitter so far in terms of providing a wealth of realtime information about just about everything.

    Of course, it’s hard to say just how valuable Google+ is in this regard without a search feature (not to mention the fact that Google+ isn’t even available to everybody yet). Singhal, did also reportedly indicate that a search feature is on the way, however.

    Here’s another bonus. Googlers are thinking about RSS on Google+. Nothing has been announced. It’s not even exactly been said that this is being worked on, but Googler Kun Zhung wrote in a Google+ update this morning, “Google+ needs to integrate rss, seriously… Why can’t we add RSS to our circles?”

    We know Google is listening to user feedback or Google+ improvements. I would have to assume they’re listening to other Googlers too. Zhang is part of Google’s YouTube team.

  • Test Site Search and Navigation Pages to Optimize Conversions

    If you’ve invested time and energy in effective, relevant, results-oriented site search and navigation, you’ve likely seen an impact on your web site – higher conversions, larger orders, more page views, less complaints and even lower abandonment rates for people who use the search box. Chances are that even if your site search is delivering good results, you can do more to optimize results pages to add even more to your bottom line and provide a better experience to your site visitors. And unless you’re testing properly, you’re probably just doing a lot of guesswork and crossing your fingers that things work out okay.

    The best way to determine how and if your site search and navigation can be improved is through A/B and multivariate testing – which allows you to measure the impact of changes to these pages. It can be difficult to know exactly what to test, how to set up the tests and how to interpret the results. However when done right it can be very rewarding because the benefits are measurable and clear. Warning: it’s a little addictive; once you start, you won’t want to stop.

    Following is a guide intended to help you determine some aspects of site search and navigation to test, and how best to go about it with as little time investment as possible.

    First off, there are some tools on the market that make A/B and multivariate testing of site search, navigation, promotions and page layouts fairly painless. The best place to start is with your site search provider. They might have a tool you can use, and you can also ask them if they offer a team of experts that will handle the tests for you.

    As far as what to test, the options are wide-ranging, and there are many factors you should consider.

    1. Number of Results per Page – What is the optimal number of results you should have on a page? If you have more, then it means your visitors don’t have to go through as many pages if they want to browse a large number of products, they just have to scroll. However a large number of products increases the page load time. Test different numbers of results to find out determine how many results appear on a page.

    2. Usability Features – Many sites now have enhanced features like video, social network sharing (e.g. “like”) buttons and user ratings and reviews. These are popular features and can be even more impactful when the content is included in search results. How you include them and even IF you should include them are questions that will be best answered through testing.

    3. Ajax Search – Some search providers offer Ajax technology, which speeds up delivery of search results pages, particularly as visitors click on refinement options, because it only resubmits any new information to be loaded to the web server. The difference can be fractions of a second, which any site owner knows can have an impact on the user experience. Whether Ajax makes a difference on your site is something worth discovering through testing.

    4. Merchandising Banners – It’s a good idea for retailers and other types of websites to usebanners on ‘no results’ pages to drive people towards popular items. Banners on site search pages (and elsewhere) are also good for highlighting special offers, like discounts on shipping, brands on sale or other items you want to promote. Where you show the banners, how big you make them and what content you include are all variables you should test.

    5. Refinement options – What refinement options you offer, how you present them (e.g. pull- down menu vs. clickable links), and what order you present them in is another worthy test. This is true for site search and navigation pages, where you need to display filtering or category options to help people more easily get to a select group of products. Another feature you can test is whether including a specific item “finder” – a box where people can input the brand, style and type of item they’re most interested in, like Cruiser Customizing’s Tire Finder – will also generate higher conversions.

    There are many more options you can test in search and navigation, but the areas outlined above are a good place to start and focus on the more critical features you should be looking at.

  • Google Maps Gets More 45° Imagery

    Google Maps Gets More 45° Imagery

    Google announced today that it is expanding 45° imagery in Google Maps to include some U.S. and international cities.

    “In Córdoba, the third largest town in the Spanish region of Andalucia, you can now explore in highly resolved images from four directions,” explains Google Geo Data Specialist Bernd Steinert. “Check out the world famous Mezquita-Catedral, a former mosque from the times when that part of Spain was ruled by the Moors, now a Roman Catholic Cathedral. Its construction as a mosque began around 800 and it was turned into a church after 1200.”

    This is pictured above.

    “A major update in the U.S. comprises Houston, the largest city of Texas and fourth largest of the United States,” adds Steinert. “Take a look at the Houston Ship Channel with all its refineries and oil tanks alongside, erected for one Million Dollars in 1902 when oil was first discovered in the area.” Below.

    Houston on Google Maps

    Here’s the full list of updated cities:

    Augsburg, Germany
    Barstow, CA
    Bartlett, TX
    Big Bear, CA
    Blackstone, VA
    Catalina Foothills, AZ
    Córdoba, Spain
    Delano, CA
    Desert Hot Springs, CA
    Richmond, VA. Elgin, TX
    Healdsburg, CA
    Helendale, CA
    Hemet, CA
    Houston, TX
    Mendoza, Argentina
    Midlothian, VA
    Napa Valley, CA
    New Braunfels, TX
    Ojai, CA
    Ottawa, Canada
    Pensacola, FL
    Porterville, CA
    Plant City, FL
    Rancho Del Lago, AZ
    Rosario, Argentina
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Sarasota, FL
    Taylor, TX
    Temecula, CA
    Treasure Island, CA
    Troy, IL
    Twentynine Palms, CA
    Wakefield, VA
    Yucca Valley, CA.

    Today Google also shared a “land art” tour of Google Earth, which is pretty interesting.

    As reported earlier, a Millennium Falcon-shaped school property has been spotted on Google Maps.

    On a side note, WebProNews reporter Abby Johnson spotted a Google Street View car here in Lexington this afternoon.

  • Yahoo Microsoft Search Alliance To Launch in Europe This Week

    Yahoo Microsoft Search Alliance To Launch in Europe This Week

    Yahoo issued an update today indicating that its “Search Alliance” with Microsoft will get underway in Europe as soon as August 3rd. That goes for Yahoo UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy.

    It won’t be a full-on transition to the way it is here in the states, at least at first. Yahoo will switch to Bing results for organic search results only. Yahoo says advertisers should continue to manage their Yahoo Search Marketing accounts as usual, and that it will provide ample notice before the paid search transition in each respective market.

    “Search ad inventory from Yahoo!, Microsoft, and their respective partners will be combined into a new, unified search marketplace, giving advertisers of all sizes access to a combined audience of 607 million unique searchers worldwide,” the Search Alliance explains on its UK site. “In the UK and France, Yahoo! and Microsoft will combine their existing marketplaces. In other markets throughout Europe, Asia and Latin America, this transition will be seamless as Microsoft is already an existing Yahoo! partner, drawing from the Yahoo! marketplace.”

    “We have adjusted the planned timing of the paid search transition for the UK, France, and Ireland,” it says. “Yahoo! advertisers with accounts in the UK and France will not transition to adCenter in 2011. Advertisers should continue to manage and optimise their campaigns on Yahoo! Search Marketing and Microsoft Advertising adCenter separately. We will provide advertisers with updated timing information well in advance of when transition activities begin, with further details to help them plan and prepare.”

    For the time being, Yahoo is advising businesses to compare organic search rankings on Yahoo Search and Bing for keywords to help determine the potential impact on traffic and sales, and then to decide if they’d like to modify their paid campaigns. They’re also telling businesses to review the Bing webmaster tools and optimize for the Bing crawler.

  • Webmasters: Googlebot Caught in Spider Trap, Ignoring Robots.txt

    Sometimes webmasters set up a spider trap or crawler trap to catch spambots or other crawlers that waste their bandwidth. If some webmasters are right, Googlebot (Google’s crawler) seems to be having some issues here.

    In the WebmasterWorld forum, member Starchild started a thread by saying, “I saw today that Googlebot got caught in a spider trap that it shouldn’t have as that dir is blocked via robots.txt. I know of at least one other person recently who this has also happened to. Why is GB ignoring robots?”

    Another member suggested that Starchild was mistaken, as such claims have been made in the past, only to find that there were other issues at play.

    Starchild responded, however, that it had been in place for “many months” with no changes. “Then I got a notification it was blocked (via the spidertrap notifier). Sure enough, it was. Upon double checking, Google webmaster tools reported a 403 forbidden error. IP was google. I whitelisted it, and Google webmaster tools then gave a success.”

    Another ember, nippi, said they also got hit by it 4 months after setting up a spider trap, which was “working fine” until now.

    “The link to the spider trap is rel=Nofollowed, the folder is banned in robot.txt. The spider trap works by banning by ip address, not user agent so its not caused by a faker – and of course robots.txt was setup up correctly and prior, it was in place days before the spider trap was turned on, and it’s run with no problems for months,” nippi added. “My logs show, it was the real google, from a real google ip address that ignored my robots.txt, ignored rel-nofollow and basically killed my site.”

    We’ve reached out to Google for comment, and if and when we receive a response.

    Meanwhile, Barry Schwartz is reporting that one site lost 60% of its traffic instantly, due to a bug in Google’s algorithm. He points to a Google Webmaster Help forum thread where Google’s Pierre Far said:

    I reached out to a team internally and they identified an algorithm that is inadvertently negatively impacting your site and causing the traffic drop. They’re working on a fix which hopefully will be deployed soon.

    Google’s Kaspar Szymanski comment on Schwartz’s post, “While we can not guarantee crawling, indexing or ranking of sites, I believe this case shows once again that our Google Help Forum is a great communication channel for webmasters.”

  • Google Search Gets a Tablet Makeover

    Google Search Gets a Tablet Makeover

    A new Google design was spotted earlier this week. Now, Google has officially announced it. It’s not a complete Google redesign, however. It’s a redesign of Google for the tablet experience.

    “As part of our effort to evolve the Google design and experience, we’ve improved the www.google.com search experience on tablets,” says software engineer Xiaorui Gan. “We’ve simplified the layout of search results pages and increased the size of page contents like text, buttons and other touch targets to make it faster and easier to browse and interact with search results in portrait or landscape view.”

    “The search button located below the search box provides quick access to specific types of results like Images, Videos, Places, Shopping and more,” explains Gan. “Just tap to open the search menu and select an option to see results in one category. For image results, we focused on improvements that enhance the viewing experience such as enlarged image previews, continuous scroll, and faster loading of image thumbnails.”

    Here’s what it looks like:

    Google Search on a tablet

    Google Search on a tablet

    The new look is rolling out in the coming days for Ipad, and tablets that utilize Android 3.1 and above. It will be available in 36 languages. You will see it by simply going to google.com in the tablet browser.

  • Google Hotel Finder Launched

    Google Hotel Finder Launched

    Google introduced something called Hotel Finder today, which it describes as an experimental search tool designed to help users find “that perfect hotel.”

    Essentially, it’s a hotel search engine, but it comes with an interesting user interface.

    “To help you figure out where the action is, Hotel Finder shines a ‘tourist spotlight’ on the most visited areas of U.S. cities,” explains software engineer Andrew McCarthy. “We select an initial shape for you based on what’s most popular or you can draw a shape around the area where you want to stay, e.g. on the ocean or along Sunset Boulevard.”

    Google Hotel Finder

    “In the ‘Compared to typical’ section, you can see how each hotel’s price compares to its historical average, so you can tell if it’s good value for your stay,” he continues. “You no longer need to open a new browser tab for each hotel result, and then go hunting around for pictures. When you select a hotel in Hotel Finder, we show you a collage of images, Google Places reviews, and key information right within the list. You can even use keyboard shortcuts (“J” and “K”) to flip through the results quickly, just like in Google Reader and News.”

    Users can add hotels to a shortlist to keep track of the ones they’re interested in. It also points you to various booking options.

    Google Hotel Finder

    All of those worried about Google providing its own versions of different kind of search results over third-party sites will probably show some concern about this (though Google has so far made no indication that these results will actually be shown within regular Google results).

    It’s interesting that Google has already released something that it specifically calls an “experimental search tool,” just after announcing that it is closing down Google Labs, where the company has normally launched its “experiments”. The shut down was billed as a refocusing by Google. It appears that Google has hardly missed a beat when it comes to experimental launches.

    Hotel Finder is currently only available in the U.S.

  • Senate Antitrust Subcommittee Announces Google Hearing

    THe U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights announced today that it will hold a hearing, “The Power of Google: Serving Consumers or Threatening Competition?” on September 21 at 2:00 PM.

    Last month, we reported that Google had been subpoenaed by the committee, seeking testimony from either Google CEO Larry Page or former CEO and current Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, but according to a report from Bloomberg, which quoted emails from the subcommittee and Google, Google only wanted to send its Chief Legal Officer David Drummond, who also serves as the company’s SVP of corporate development. Drummond, Google said was “the executive who can best answer their questions.”

    Schmidt did eventually agree to testify at the hearing, as Politico reported earlier this month. A Google spokesperson was quoted as saying, “Sens. Kohl and Lee expressed a strong desire to have our executive chairman appear in front of the subcommittee, and we’re happy to accommodate them. We appreciate their willingness to work with us to make it happen this fall.”

    That would be Herb Kohl and Mike Lee. Kohl is the chairman who will preside over the hearing. “We look forward to Eric Schmidt’s participation at our Antitrust Subcommittee hearing in September,” Kohl had said. “This will allow us to have a truly informational and thorough public hearing.”

    Of course FairSearch, the organization put together originally to see Google’s ITA Software acquisition blocked (unsuccessfully) as anticompetitive, and who has been committed to fueling the fire of anti-competition claims against Google ever since, had something to say about the announcement. On the organization’s blog, it says:

    FairSearch.org applauds the subcommittee’s Chairman Herb Kohl (D-WI) and Ranking Member Mike Lee (R-UT) for their vision and leadership in calling for Congressional scrutiny of Google’s dominance of online search and allegations that it has abused that dominance to advantage its own services and harm innovation, consumers and competition.

    Congress is right to investigate these issues and to examine the threats that Google’s unchecked dominance poses to the Internet ecosystem. As Sen. Lee stated in a letter to Chairman Kohl this May, “Enforcement of the antitrust laws is especially important for sectors in which the United States has been a leader, such as the e-commerce and online advertising industries.”

    FairSearch.org believes the proper enforcement of antitrust laws is a critical linchpin in the Internet’s continued role as a driving force behind the U.S. economy, and ensuring that the Internet remains a force that continues to deliver benefits to consumers and society. After all, it is competition that drives innovation and consumer benefits online.

    FairSearch also put out a report this week accusing Google of “grossly exaggerating” its impact as a company on the U.S. economy.

    Meanwhile, Google is still trying to win Department of Justice approval of its proposed acquisition of ad optimization platform AdMeld, and is in the midst of a broader antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.

    In a post to its own Public Policy Blog last night, Google defended its competitive practices once again.

  • Google Page Speed Service Rewrites Your Pages

    Google announced this morning that it’s releasing a new new web performance tool for webmeisters called Page Speed Service. This follows several other offerings from the company in the page speed realm, including a browser extension, the Page Speed Online API, and an Apache module.

    “Page Speed Service is an online service that automatically speeds up loading of your web pages,” explains engineering manager Ram Ramani. “To use the service, you need to sign up and point your site’s DNS entry to Google. Page Speed Service fetches content from your servers, rewrites your pages by applying web performance best practices, and serves them to end users via Google’s servers across the globe. Your users will continue to access your site just as they did before, only with faster load times. Now you don’t have to worry about concatenating CSS, compressing images, caching, gzipping resources or other web performance best practices.”

    According to Joshua Bixby, who blogs at Web Peformance Today and runs Strangeloop, a site acceleration solutions provider, you may want to think twice about such a tool if you’re running an enterprise level site.

    “The offering is geared to small sites with little to no complexity, which is very different from enterprise offerings in the market,” he tells WebProNews. “The new Google product will break pages; enterprise web content optimization systems have many systems that ensure this does not happen.”

    “The features are basic and they are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to acceleration,” he adds. “It performs a few basic acceleration features, some of which have the capability to slow down pages.”

    “The features don’t today address the most important performance challenges faced by the enterprise,” Bixby continues. “It might speed up individual page but not transactions or flows (i.e., it will probably hurt conversion); enterprise WCO companies look across pages and examine user flows to ensure optimal flows instead of pages. Some of the major performance issues facing pages today not solved by the new product include 3rd party tags, consolidation of images, etc.

    ” It is a very interesting competitive offering to Amazon and some of the small cloud acceleration players like CloudFlare, Blaze, Torbit, and Yotta,” he concludes. “The cloud providers offering basic page based acceleration features targeted at the small- to mid-market will be faced with a formidable competitor.”

    Ramani says Google has seen speed improvements of 25% to 60% on several sites. They offer a tool here, where you can run tests.

    Google says it will be adding improvements to the service.

    Right now, Page Speed Service is only being offered to a limited set of webmasters for free, but the service won’t be free forever. Google says pricing will be “competitive,” and that details will be made available later. There is an application form here.

    Don’t forget, last year, Google announced that site speed is included as a ranking signal in its search algorithms.

  • Google Tests Design Change, Launches Mobile Maps Update

    Amit Agarwal reports (with screenshots) that Google is testing a new design layout that places familiar search options at the top of the screen, and actually makes the search results page more Google Profile-ish. The options are available through tabs at the top.

    The screenshots show a single column design, but the ads are strangely missing.

    Google Redesign Being Tested

    Image Credit: Digital Inspiration

    It’s hard to say whether this design will come to fruition. Users (at least some) have probably just gotten accustomed to the major redesign of last year, which saw the left panel come to the table, making the Google experience considerably more Bing looking. This design would certainly separate it more from that.

    Today, Google announced an update for Google Maps for Android to improve Google Places and Google Latitude with the following features:

    • Upload photos for a Place
    • My Places as a simple way to manage the Places you’ve starred and recently viewed
    • Descriptive terms for Places in search results
    • Add a new Place on-the-go when checking in

    “When deciding on a place to go, people often want to know what a place looks like in addition to seeing ratings and reviews,” says product manager Benjamin Grol. “You can now contribute photos to help others get a sense of places. You can now attach your photos to Places, and yours may even become the profile picture for that page. If you want to view or delete any photos you’ve contributed to Places, you can manage uploaded photos in the ‘Photos for Google Maps’ album on your Picasa account.”

    Google Maps for Android Gets Update

    In June we announced descriptive terms and ‘My Places’ for the desktop,” adds Grol. “Both these features are now in Google Maps for mobile. Descriptive terms appear in search results for Places to inform you what businesses are ‘known for,’ such as their ‘eggs benedict’ or being ‘worth the wait.’ Also, My Places for mobile provides quick access to starred and recent Place pages you’ve looked at. You can access My Places by pressing your phone’s menu button while in Google Maps.”

    The update requires Android 2.1 or higher.

  • FairSearch Accuses Google of “Grossly” Exaggerating Contribution to Economy

    FairSearch Accuses Google of “Grossly” Exaggerating Contribution to Economy

    The FairSearch Coalition released a report today, which it calls “an independent critical analysis of reports released by Google about its purported 2009 and 2010 economic impact in the U.S.”

    Economist Allen Rosenfeld was commissioned by FairSearch to review Google’s reports, and compare them against economic literature and standard practices, the organization tells WebProNews, adding that he retained full editorial control over his conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed in the report.

    “Rosenfeld concluded that Google overestimated its potential economic impact by more than 100x, and did not even take into account the negative economic effects (higher advertising costs that are passed on to consumers) of one company dominating a market to the extent that Google does (more than 70% of search in U.S., a higher % of search ad revenue; and more than 90% of search in most of Europe),” a representative for FairSearch said. “In Rosenfeld’s opinion, if that impact were to be taken into account, Google’s net economic impact could be negative.”



    “As the FTC and other antitrust enforcers scrutinize Google’s business, and whether it abuses its dominance and how that harms consumers, innovation and competition, it’s important to look closely at any claims by Google that it is after anything other than inflating its own profits at everyone else’s expense,” they added.



    Robert Birge, Chief Marketing Officer of KAYAK (a founding member of FairSearch.org), offered the following statement: “The Google tax isn’t obvious, but it’s very real. As Google has become the starting place for most people on the Internet, companies large and small have to pay a toll in order to just show up on the consideration list. These costs are real, they are substantial, and they get passed along to the end user even if they are hidden.”

    Under the “main findings and conclusions” section of the report, Rosenfeld writes:

  • Google’s claims about its contribution to the U.S. economy are grossly exaggerated; can deceive policy makers, news media, and the public; and should not be trusted.
  • Google’s overestimate was at least 100 times the value of the actual contribution of its search engine. Google takes credit for economic activity that is mostly generated by other economic agents. In reality, the contribution of Google’s search engine to the economy is very small, amounting to at most only 1% of the overestimated economic contribution claimed by Google in its reports.
  • Google’s net impact on the economy could well be negative after accounting for the impacts of its dominance and market power. Google has consistently generated percent net (profit) margins that are between 4 and 8 times the U.S. corporate average, indicating that advertisers’ costs are likely higher than they would be in a competitive market environment.
  • Google’s misleading claims were largely the result of fatally flawed, inaccurate assumptions. Google’s analysis contradicted economic logic, did not take into account obvious costs of doing business, ignored the results of previous empirical economic studies, and failed to consider negative economic impacts of the company’s market dominance.
  • The full report by Rosenfeld can be found here (pdf). We’ve reached out to Google for comment on this. We’ll update accordingly.

    Earlier this month, FairSearch launched a site called “Searchville,” dedicated to blasting Google’s business practices.

  • New Twitter Search Improves on Finding Conversations

    New Twitter Search Improves on Finding Conversations

    Twitter has redone its search feature, and it’s much more enjoyable to use now, if you ask me. The design replicates that of the “new Twitter”. If you click on a tweet from the search results, another pane will open up with that tweet, and the conversation that surrounds it. That in itself makes this version of Twitter search much more user-friendly.

    This will be especially helpful for reporters looking to Twitter for conversation relevant to a story, as we often do here at WebProNews. Now you can see the direct conversation in a nice little thread format.

    New Twitter Search

    Twitter says it includes more relevant search results, as well as photos and videos, which will also be tremendously helpful.

    The search.twitter.com site is now twitter.com/search. Major improvements include more relevant search results and related photos & videos! 1 day ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Users can switch between Top, All, and “With Links” as search options. Top would be the supposedly relevant ones, All would be by time, and With Links would be…well, with links.

    If you want to see all results instead of relevance-filtered results,
    click “Top” above search results and select “All.” #protip 1 day ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    It’s worth noting that this update to Twitter search comes at a time when people are questioning the lack of a search feature on Twitter’s new major competitor, Google+. That lack is especially questionable, considering that the product comes from Google, the reigning king of search.

  • DaniWeb Claims 110% Recovery from Google Panda Update

    This week, it was confirmed that Google had made a minor adjustment to its Panda algorithm update, which has drastically altered the search engine’s results several times since its first iteration in February.

    Have you seen any rankings changes with this latest incarnation of the Panda update? Let us know in the comments.

    As Google makes hundreds of algorithmic changes each year, Google downplayed this as any major shift. The official statement, as obtained by Barry Schwartz, was:

    “We’re continuing to iterate on our Panda algorithm as part of our commitment to returning high-quality sites to Google users. This most recent update is one of the roughly 500 changes we make to our ranking algorithms each year.”

    It appears that it may be more major than we originally thought. We had seen a few comments from webmasters indicating that their rankings had somewhat improved, but now Dani Horowitz, whose DaniWeb discussion forum was an apparently innocent casualty of the Panda updates’s wrath tells WebProNews that the site has made a full “110% recovery” as a result of this most recent Panda tweak.

    When we interviewed Horowitz back in May, she told us about some various tactics she was engaging in, which seemed to be having positive effects on her site’s search referrals.

    While what she was seeing was far from a full recovery, it was enough to give webmasters hope that they may be able to climb their way back up into Google’s good graces, despite having been victimized by the update. In other words, there were enough other ranking factors that sites could use to improve their rankings to avoid being totally deprived of search referrals at the hands of Panda – good news for those sites with quality content that were casualties of Google’s war on poor content.

    At the time, DaniWeb had a long way to go, however, to reach the levels of traffic it was seeing from Google before. Even more interesting perhaps, was the fact that Google seemed to be ranking DaniWeb well for things that didn’t make sense, while things that that it ranked well for previously that did make sense, were sending traffic elsewhere.

    “Panda 2.3 went live on July 23rd and traffic just instantly jumped back up to normal that very day,” Horowitz now tells us. “We’re now seeing traffic at the same pre-Panda highs in some countries, while other countries are even better than ever. Overall, we’re seeing more pageviews than ever before.”

    Here’s a look at global visitors and US visitors respectively since the beginning of the year (that’s visitors, not pageviews):

    DaniWeb Global visitors

    DaniWeb US visitors

    “Notice that US visitors were affected on February 24th while global traffic wasn’t severely impacted until a month and a half later,” Horowitz points out. “The decline coincided exactly with the first iteration of Panda and the recovery coincided exactly with the latest iteration of Panda.”

    “All of the changes I’ve made were documented in the official Google Support thread or in the video interview I did with you guys,” she tells us. “In fact, I hadn’t made any recent changes immediately before the recovery. I haven’t yet had a chance to investigate any specific long tail keywords yet either. Google Webmaster Tools looks very different from what it looked like back in March as a result of all the work I’ve done, but nothing that stands out between this month and last.”

    She did add in the Google Support thread, “There were no big changes made immediately before the site came back, with the exception of a significant increase in my Google AdWords budget.” She followed this up shortly after with, “I mentioned AdWords because we use it heavily to increase registrations, which directly results in an increase in posts per day. If there was a correlation, then it was a sudden increase in new content followed the penalty reversal.”

    Here’s our previous interview with Dani, so you can gain more insight into the kinds of things she was doing in the first place:

    We’ll keep our eyes peeled for more reports of full recoveries. I have to wonder how many wrongfully impacted sites have seen their rankings jump back up. Either way, provided that DaniWeb’s recovery was indeed a direct result from this latest Panda tweak, other victims might find hope in that Google does continue to “iterate” on the Panda algorithm.

    Have you noticed a significant change in rankings since the latest iteration of the Panda update? Any more ill recoveries? Let us know.

  • Google Made a Minor Tweak to the Panda Update

    Google makes hundreds of changes to its algorithm every year. Some days it makes more than one (obviously). One day last week, the search engine reportedly made a small tweak to the Panda part.

    Barry Schwartz posted the following statement from Google regarding the matter:

    “We’re continuing to iterate on our Panda algorithm as part of our commitment to returning high-quality sites to Google users. This most recent update is one of the roughly 500 changes we make to our ranking algorithms each year.

    So, take that for what you will.

    Google has not given any new indications of what it is doing differently on the Panda front, but as the company has said in the past, they will continue to “iterate” on it.

    A few webmasters recently took to the forums to express that their sites had suddenly changed rankings, and interestingly quite a few seemed to be for the better. That’s kind of a change of pace from the grumbles we’ve been hearing for the better part of the year.

    We still haven’t heard of any full recoveries, though HubPages is taking an interesting approach, as we looked at recently, by giving authors their own subdomains, as to separate content author by author, so one author who writes poorly doesn’t drag down the content of a higher quality author.

    In early tests, HubPages has seen some success in rankings for certain content employing this strategy. The jury is still out on how this will impact the site as a whole.

    Update: Dani Horowitz tells us that Daniweb, which we discussed at length in an interview with her, has made a full recovery (see comments below). More on DaniWeb’s recovery here.

  • Add Your Google+ Circles to Results in Google Search, Bing, IMDB, Wikipedia, eBay and More

    We’ve written about Wajam a few times. It’s a social search tool that you can add as a browser extension, which displays results from your social networks at the top of Google or Bing search results. For example, I can search for “shoes,” and if anyone I’m connected to via Twitter or Facebook (or other sources) has said anything about shoes lately, those results will show up at the top of the page.

    Today, Wajam announced that it is now including Google Circles in the mix.

    “When we heard about the launch of Google’s newest foray into social networks this past month, we were excited,” Wajam community manager Alain Wong wrote in a blog post. “Although Google Buzz was introduced with lofty intentions, and Google Wave had the potential to disrupt, both products never hit the spot. With the launch of Google+, it looks like Google finally hit a home run.”

    “Once Google+ launched, we immediately started thinking about what it meant for Wajam users, and what it meant for the social search landscape,” said Wong. “Some early critics focused on the lack of search in Google+ and on the need for alternatives. Other people were closing their Facebook profiles now that there was a viable alternative. From these reactions, we understood that people wanted the freedom to choose their preferred networks, so it made perfect sense to add Google+ to our social search plugin.”

    Google Plus Comes to Wajam

    Wajam on Bing

    It’s not just on the major search engines that Wajam users might run across unexpected, but potentially useful results from their friends. A few weeks ago, Wajam launched “Wajam Everywhere,” which also shows you results at the top of various popular sites, such as: TripAdvisor, IMDB, Wikipedia, Yelp, Walmart, BestBuy, Overstock, etc.

    Wajam on IMDB

    This way you might see some related opinions from friends on things you are already looking at. Now, that includes people in your Google+ Circles.

    Meanwhile, Google has yet to implement a useful search feature (beyond just people search) in Google+, although there are still ways to search it.

    Of course Google does its own brand of social search in its own regular web search results, I’m still partial to the Wajam method which places them in a box where you know these types of results are going to appear every time, and now they even appear at more places across the web, which can be useful at best, and interesting in other cases.

    For example, maybe you seeing a thumbs down from a co-worker about a certain movie while you’re searching IMDB isn’t enough to make you change your mind about whether or not you want to watch it, but it might still give you some more insight into the kinds of things that person does like, which in an increasingly social search landscape, can give you clues as to how much you want to trust their opinions in other matters.

  • +1 Button on AdWords: Paying for What You Could Get for Free?

    Before Google unleashed its new social network Google+, it launched the +1 button, which appears on content sites across the web, in Google search results, and on Google’s AdWords ads. Now that the button appears in the Google+ stream as well, it’s likely that the +1 buttons everywhere will get clicked more.

    What if you don’t want the feature on your ads though? Do you have a choice? Perhaps you feel like it could lead to more clicks that you don’t want to pay for. One advertiser shared a story with WebProNews about just such a scenario, and discussed his struggle trying to opt out of the feature, which has so far been unsuccessful.

    Should advertisers be able to opt out from having +1 buttons on their search ads? Tell us what you think.

    First, here’s how Google explains the +1 button in relation to AdWords:

    When making decisions, people often turn to those they trust for recommendations. Now with the +1 button, people can recommend your site’s content or ads to their friends and contacts right when their advice is most useful – on Google search.

    Let’s say you own a hotel in Madrid. Brian is having a lovely stay at your hotel, and visits your site to look up local attractions. He sees the +1 button you’ve added to your page, and clicks it to recommend your business to his friends and contacts.

    When Brian’s friend Ann plans her trip to Spain, she signs in to her Google account, searches on Google, and also sees your hotel’s ad – plus the personalized annotation that Brian +1’d it. Knowing that Brian recommends your hotel helps Ann decide where to stay during her travels.

    “I was informed by a standard email presumably sent to all AdWords advertisers advising of +1 and explaining that AdWords would be visible within the +1 social network, meaning that if Bill clicks on my advert then all of Bill’s +1 friends are also shown my advert and therefore invited to click on it also,” Jon, an AdWords advertiser tells WebProNews.

    Jon’s business is a campground, and he claims to have strong geographic and language preferences, and his AdWords account set so that his ads only appear on search engine results. “I am an ex IT consultant and very Internet savvy,” he says. “I fine tune my AdWords campaigns.”

    “I don’t want to have my adverts shown on the +1 network,” he tells us. “The principle reason is that I only want to spend money reaching totally virgin customers. The reason for this is that campers are social animals, and as soon as Bill finds a great campground he will tell all his camping buddies. I don’t need help from Google getting referrals via this mechanism. Once Bill knows I am content to wait until Bill tells his friends verbally or via email, that does not cost me a dime.”

    “The other objection is that Bill may have friends in other geographic locations who may speculatively click on my advert as exposed to them via Bill and the +1 network, whereas previously I could limit geographic scope on my AdWords campaign,” he adds. “And Bill is intelligent enough to know which of his online buddies lives too far away to find my campground of interest – and anyway I am not paying for Bill’s verbal or email recommendations.”

    Jon pointed to the hassle he has had trying to opt out of +1’s on his ads. “Last time I looked there was no ‘+1′ opt out on the AdWords users’ control panel – I expected just to login and tick the appropriate ‘NO’ box and all would be cool (I was still irritated that I was opted in by default, but hey they are trying to make money aren’t they?).”

    “Nope – you have to hunt around documentation to find a buried ‘opt out form’. By buried I mean that Google clearly don’t want you to find it easily,” he says. “You have to read FAQs and things first.”

    The form looks like this:

    Opt Out form for +1 Button on AdWords

    “When I tried the form it didn’t work. It failed to give a confirmation page and instead indicated a field error by stipulating ‘required field’ in red, but unfortunately this was next to the very tick box that I deselected to indicate that I wanted to opt out,” he says. “I worked in IT for 15 years and I can design a bug free form in my sleep but Google engineers needed two attempts over two weeks with me sending screen shots and verifying that I had tried multiple browsers and so on.”

    “After about two weeks of Googles ‘experts’ working on the issue they got the form working so I was able to indicate that I wanted to opt out,” he continues. “Then I followed up by indicating my lack of confidence in this whole setup with the Google guy who has been handling my case and asked when I was going to actually hear anything . You see, the opt out option is not a ‘right’ or an immediate thing – it is a ‘REQUEST’.”

    Jon claims a Google employee told him:

    Hi Jon,

    I spoke with the PM responsible for this and he re-iterated the following:

    »Submitting this form is not a guarantee that your campaigns will be opted
    out of social features.” This is clearly stated on the submission form
    itself.«

    If his request were to be granted then you would be contacted as also
    explicitly stated on the form.

    >From the form: “We will review these requests and may contact you at the
    e-mail address provided.” – notice it says may, not will.

    “So you see I have only managed to get on the waiting lists to be ‘CONSIDERED’ for opt out, and apparently I can only be sure that I will be contacted if my ‘REQUEST IS GRANTED’,” Jon says. “May I reiterate here that I am ‘requesting’ the right to decide how my advertising revenue is spent. I know my customers and I believe that the +1 network will deliver only what I get for free right now but at a price.”

    “I am not against +1 or its incorporation into AdWords, but I am really annoyed that Google has first of all opted me in by default, then provided me with a buggy opt out mechanism that takes two weeks to fix, and then tells me as if a royal speaking to a subject that what I consider to be a ‘DEMAND’ is actually a ‘REQUEST’, and that I ‘MAY’ be contacted if they decide to ‘GRANT’ me the right to decide how my money is spent.”

    What do you think of Jon’s story? Should opting out of this feature be a right or is it simply Google’s right to handle this feature of its product how it sees fit? Tell us what you think in the comments.

  • Google Adds Direct Answers for Special Occasions to Search Results Pages

    Google has started including dates for particular holidays and celebrations right on the search results page for certain queries. That includes some more obscure occasions, such as National Popcorn Day.

    “This currently works for certain future and past national and religious holidays, internationally recognized days such as World AIDS Day, and designated days to celebrate fun things like popcorn and cookies in the U.S.,” says Google software engineer intern Anis Abboud. “Speaking of which, it’s time to start looking for great cheesecake recipes, as National Cheesecake Day is just around the corner!”

    National Popcorn Day on  Google

    “It can be difficult keeping track of the dates of national holidays when it’s hard enough to remember special anniversaries and loved ones’ birthdays,” says Abboud.

    I don’t think it’s been that hard to find these dates in the past, but this would make it at least one click easier.

    I would not be surprised to see brands continue to manufacture new “holidays” based on the products that they sell. It will be interesting to see how Google keeps up this feature related to those.

  • Redesigning Your Site? Don’t Make it Harder for Google to Extract the Text

    Google posted one of the Matt Cutts Q&A videos today, where he talks about the effects of site redesigns with redirects on search rankings. Here’s the specific question as it was posed to Matt:

    I’m changing the platform of my blog. All old URLs will redirect to new ones. But, since the HTML code and layout of the pages are different, do you lose search engine rankings?

    “Well, search engine rankings can change when the page changes itself,” Cutts responds. “If you’re doing the 301s correctly – a permanent redirect from the old site to the new site, and if you’re doing it at a page level – so from the old page to the new page – you should be in relatively good shape, but it’s not just incoming links.”

    “It’s also the content of the page itself,” he continues. “So if you had a really good layout with a really clean design, where all the text was really easily indexed, and you move to something that was a lot more confusing, and maybe the text wasn’t as easy for us to extract, that could change your search rankings for the downside, or for the negative.”

    “In general, we’re relatively good about changing layouts and still being able to discern what that page is about, but here’s one test that you could do: as long as you haven’t done the transition yourself, if you can try making a few tests, where you can take the layout of the new page or the new site, and see if you can apply it in some very simple ways to the old site, then that’s a way to isolate those, because it’s just like any scientific experiment,” he says. “If you do two things at once, and your rankings go down, you can’t decouple what caused it. Whereas if you can change just the layout – even if it’s only on a few pages, to try out and see whether your rankings change with that, then you’ll know – was it more likely to be because of the redirects or because I was changing my HTML layout.”

    In terms of layouts, you may also do well to consider the role design plays in how Google determines quality content. Would people be comfortable giving your site their credit card info? Design can play a big role in this. Another question on Google’s list of “questions that one could use to assess the ‘quality’ of a page or an article,” is “Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?” Then there’s the whole load time factor. Google does count page speed as a ranking signal.