WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • Google & “Young Babysitters”: An Exercise In Pornified Phenomenology

    Do you ever play that game where you Google random words or phrases like “ice cream” or “Kevin” or “filipino” just to see how far up in the results the first pornography page shows up? It’s a good holiday game. Something the whole family can enjoy.

    Apparently this isn’t so much fun for at least one person, who posted a complaint on Google’s Web Search Help forum:

    Wow. Quite a fascinating conundrum we have here. Anyone have any guess as to why?

    Anyone?

    …..Any-one?

    …..Bueller….?

    Wait! – Maybe those results are appearing because the Internet is obviously overrun with lecherous hordes of young babysitter-porn hounds! Actually, that’s undoubtedly a scientific fact of the universe. Anyone familiar with Rule 34 will shrug off this event without any further concern but this problem demands our continued attention as nothing so far really explains why similar searches for “babysitters,” “teen babysitters,” or “good babysitters” don’t return the same lurid results as “young babysitters.” A search of “young babysitters” returns, save for the second and third results, an entire page of babysitter-themed hardcore pornography. However, searching the other terms I listed above, all you receive are sites legitimately associated with the honest profession of babysitting children.

    This perplexing discovery beggars the important question: Why would Google’s search results for specifically “young babysitter” defile such an otherwise innocent inquiry on how to become a babysitter? What libidinous fascination with young babysitters has seeped so deeply into our cultural subconscious that, upon searching the Internet, this particular word pairing should automatically yield pants-shrinking depictions of prurient affairs?

    The most likely answer? We’re all perverts and these results are probably completely appropriate (NSFW, by the way) to the motives of “young babysitter” Googlers. The information that Google provides us is based solely on humanity’s prevailing interest and, in this case, that mechanism happens to perform like a dark mirror in which we glimpse our twisted reflection snarling back at us. Occasionally someone doesn’t recognize this reflection, like the forum poster above, and confusion begins. According to Google’s results, when most of us hear “young babysitters” we cognitively index that construct as “sex with young babysitters.”

    So let this be a lesson to all of you Internet searchers and would-be babysitters: be very careful with how you choose your search terms because something as seemingly benign as “young” could easily be an Internet synonym for yeahright.

  • Google: No More Panda Updates This Year

    Google: No More Panda Updates This Year

    Google formally announced via Twitter that there will be no more Panda updates for the remainder of the year. Granted, there’s not that much left of the year.

    This might have been nice to know a little bit earlier, but it’s still good to know. The last known Panda update happened nearly a month ago.

    Here’s Google’s “weather report” tweet (I’d embed it, but now Twitter’s giving me fail whales):

    Search weather report: no major Panda updates until the new year. Context: http://t.co/nDkj74ou

    There has been some discussion in WebmasterWorld about the possibility of Google taking a break on Panda for the holidays. Barry Schwartz over at SearchEngineRoundtable picked up on this disucssion as well, noting that Google probably doesn’t want a repeat of the whole Florida udpate fiasco, where online retailers kind of got the shaft due to an unexpected algorithm change years ago.

    Of course, in more recent years, Google has been pretty open about not wanting to do that to sites, and has recently expressed its goal to be more transparent about algorithm updates in general.

    Even if Google had thrown another Panda update at us, I’m not sure it would be comparable to the Florida situation, as that was much more unexpected. Google has semi-regularly been updating the Panda update all year, and savvy webmasters know that this will continue.

  • Google Analytics Site Speed Metrics Expanded

    Google Analytics Site Speed Metrics Expanded

    Google announced the launch of some new metrics for the Site Speed report in Google Analytics.

    The metrics are aimed at giving webmaster a better understanding of how they can improve their website performance. Speed, we know, is a ranking signal for Google, so this is probably one worth paying attention to.

    That said, Google’s Matt Cutts did kind of downplay the impact speed actually has on rankings. It’s a signal, but it’s certainly not the loudest. Still, it’s good for the user experience, and we know Google likes that. Of course, it’s always good to have a good user experience no matter what is impact from Google is.

    In the “technical” section in each of the site speed tabs (Explorer, Performance and Map Overlay), there is new set of metrics.

    GA Reports

    “The Technical section of the Explorer and Map Overlay tabs provides details on the network and server metrics,” the company explains on the Google Analytics blog. “Similarly, the additional sections of the Performance tab shows summaries for each of these metrics. These network and server metrics are one component of Avg. Page Load Time; the other component is browser time, i.e., the browser overhead for parsing and executing the JavaScript, rendering the page and other overheads such as fetching additional resources (scripts/stylesheets/images).”

    The site speed report also displays: avg. redirection time, avg. domain lookup time, avg. server connection time, avg. server response time, and avg. page download time.

    “If you notice that some of the metrics are higher than expected, review your site operations and test if changes lead to improvements,” Google says. “For example, if you notice that Avg. Domain Lookup Time is high, you might want to change your DNS provider. A high Server Connection Time, on the other hand, is a metric that you might not be able to reduce.”

    “To most significantly increase your website’s speed, evaluate your Site Speed report for metrics that have the largest values and target those for improvement,” Google adds.

    For example, for a high average redirection time, you might evaluate whether redirects are even necessary. Google suggests also checking to see if a specific referrer is causing high redirect latency. For high average domain lookup time, you might change DNS providers. For high average server response time, you might reduce your backend processing time or place a server closer to users. For high average page load times, reduce your initial data size.

  • Bing Algorithm May Have Cost Businesses and Students

    If you were running promotions for Black Friday or Cyber Monday, you’d probably want to be found in search engines as people scrambled for holiday deals. You might even be offended if you weren’t ranking reasonably well when not only do you own the domain CyberMonday.com, but you are the one credited for coming up with Cyber Monday in the first place.

    Well, that’s what happened to Shop.org (which is a division of the National Retail Federation), which is credited with coming up with Cyber Monday, and does own CyberMonday.com. Bing banned CyberMonday.com from its search results just at the time of the year when the site would be most useful to consumers. It’s back now, but who’s looking for Cyber Monday deals at this point?

    Did Bing make a mistake? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Danny Sullivan first reported on the ordeal at the end of November, when Bing told him:

    Consistent with our guidance to site owners, websites that seem to rely mostly on affiliate content or that offer only thin content often don’t deliver the value searchers are looking for and may be demoted or removed from our index. This is something we continually refine and look at closely throughout the year.

    It’s nothing new, and follows guidance we’ve given on our webmaster site. We don’t have any specifics to share.

    Thin content. As Sullivan pointed out, it sounds like Bing’s version of Panda, but at the same time, they said it was nothing new.

    Now, a couple weeks later, Sullivan is sharing another statement from Bing saying:

    Black Friday and Cyber Monday are notorious times for spammers, and during this time Bing’s spam classification algorithm picked up this spam pattern and heightened its criteria.

    Bing took proactive action to protect our users by removing questionable domains.

    In an effort to protect our users some questionable domains may have been demoted or removed that some may consider legitimate sites.

    We have since revised our algorithm which has led to some previously blocked sites returning to the index.

    The site was never demoted by Google, which has been on a well-documented campaign by the name of Panda to get rid of “thin content” from its top search results. When I search “cyber monday” in Google, cybermonday.com is second in the organic listings only to the Wikipedia page for Cyber Monday.

    I guess the real question is: is cybermonday.com an ideal search result for the query Cyber Monday?

    It seems to be good enough for both Google and Bing now. The site basically exists solely to provide users with Cyber Monday deals, and when consumers are searching for “cyber monday,” there’s a good chance that’s exactly what they’re looking for. And who better to point to these deals than the entity that created Cyber Monday in the first place?

    You might say that this result would be at its most relevant right around the time when it was banned by Bing. People searching for “cyber monday” in June might be looking more for information about the day (like numbers or advice on preparation for example), but it they’re searching for it just ahead of Cyber Monday or on Cyber Monday itself, the probability that they’re looking for deals goes up.

    This would have probably caused a much greater stink if this happened with Google rather than Bing, especially considering all of the antitrust talk and scrutiny that surrounds Google these days. In fact, Sullivan noted in his article that some have even accused Bing of demoting sites in favor of driving traffic to its own Bing Shopping results. But Bing doesn’t have nearly the search market share that Google does, so the impact probably wasn’t as great as it could have been otherwise.

    But that’s not to say there was no impact. Bing’s market share has grown steadily since its launch, and it also powers Yahoo’s results.

    This year, Cyber Monday was the biggest online spending day in history in the U.S. There were a lot of businesses competing for that money. It makes you wonder how this might have affected sales for the businesses featuring deals on CyberMonday.com. These are all third-party businesses mind you. It’s not like it’s just Shop.org getting affected here.

    On top of that, a portion of the proceeds from the purchases made from the CyberMonday.com site go to support a scholarship fund for students pursuing careers in the e-commerce industry.

    This algorithm adjustment may have actually affected student financial aid.

    To review what Bing had to day about it: “In an effort to protect our users some questionable domains may have been demoted or removed that some may consider legitimate sites.”

    Yes. Some may consider CyberMonday.com from Shop.org from the National Retail Federation a legitimate site.

    Apparently Bing does too, since it’s back in the search results, with about a year to go before it’s at its most relevant.

    Did Bing mess up here? Tell us what you think in the comments.

  • Exclusive: Ask Aims To Make Q&A More Social

    Exclusive: Ask Aims To Make Q&A More Social

    Earlier this year Ask.com opened up its community portion of the site to its entire user base. This gave users the ability to ask questions and get answers from people. Since then, the company has been re-tooling its site looking for ways to get users more engaged.

    “As we’ve all seen, Q&A sites are growing in popularity and there’s a reason for it; people are inherently curious AND want to share their expertise and answers/opinions,” Ask CTO Lisa Kavanaugh tells WebProNews. “By seeing how our 60 million users are interacting on Ask.com, people really do want to help others out by sharing their own knowledge and opinions on topics they care about.”

    Ask is rolling out a new feature on its Category pages – the top categories of questions people ask on the site. Categories include: Arts, Cars & Transportation, Entertainment, Food & Drink, Politics & Government, Science, Sports & Recreation, Technology, etc. Ask will place the most asked and answered questions front and center.

    Ask believes this will drive the community to become more social (answering, commenting and asking more questions). The Category pages themselves, Ask says, are designed to create appealing destinations people return to often.

    “These pages have been reorganized to create a compelling destination for Ask.com users that are passionate about certain topics, prompting them to ask more questions, and compelling them to answer more meaningfully,” the company tells us. “These pages are more visually appealing and engaging because they’re showing what excites people most by pushing the most popular content front and center.”

    “Ask.com is always studying and analyzing user behavior in the community and we proactively made this change,” a spokesperson says. “We’re exploring several new techniques to help keep users engaged on the site even longer and to keep Ask as their go-to destination when it comes to getting answers to their questions. We believe this change will help increase engagement on the category pages and increase content contribution in each category.”

    Users will still be able to view recently asked questions, and can see them by scrolling down on each Category Page.

    Ask says it gets twice as many visits from people who pose questions to each other, as opposed to the search box. That’s pretty obvious if you think about it. They’re going to return to see the answers. 60 million users is a lot of people. Keeping them coming back and finding a way to keep them engaged is key.

  • Google Panda, Google+, and Other Search Events of 2011

    It’s hard to believe that 2011 is drawing to a close, but it is. That said, if you could sum up the search industry over the course of the year in one word, what would it be? According to search veteran Bruce Clay, that word is “turmoil.”

    What do you remember most about the search industry in 2011? Let us know.

    Looking back at 2011

    The turmoil that Clay was referring to was largely because of Google’s Panda update. As WebProNews previously reported, Google rolled out its Panda update in an effort to target low quality sites across the Web. The impact of it, however, was extremely significant. Many people, such as Dani Horowitz of DaniWeb, saw their site drop dramatically and had no idea why.

    “We’ve determined, or at least convinced ourselves, that linking, the quality of your inbound link networking, is also part of the quality of your site certainly at a trust level,” said Clay. “Trust scores and components associated with the quality of how your site connects to everybody is part of the factor to determine whether or not you are a site worthy of ranking.”

    He went on to say that Panda was “disruptive” but that he thought, in the end, that it had helped Google’s search results.

    “Overall, I think that the results have improved,” he said.

    Google also released a “Freshness” update not long ago that was intended to index fresher content more quickly. From Clay’s perspective, this update really only impacts news content. Fortunately, most people seem to be hopeful about it.

    Another move, however, that Google made that did and will continue to have an impact on the search industry was Google’s move to encrypt search. If you remember, Google said it would begin encrypting logged-in searches that users do by default when they are logged into Google.com. For SEOs, this means that they will not receive referral data from the websites consumers click on from Google search results.

    Although Google claimed the move was done to protect user privacy, most SEOs – Clay included – aren’t buying into this theory, mostly because the move did not impact advertisers.

    “I really think that the intent there was more to allow Google to see what we are searching for themselves because they are now in the stream,” said Clay. “It’s sort of not a universal privacy issue [because] people don’t know, many times, that it’s an ad.”

    While Google announcements have primarily dominated the 2011 recap thus far, the yearly events do go beyond the search giant. For starters, social media is bleeding over much more into search. Clay told us that social media, and especially Twitter, has changed how people find sites.

    In other words, social media is becoming a replacement for the browser. Searchers look to their social networks for recommendations and reviews before they visit the brand sites. Clay said that this shift in behavior is still resulting in conversions even though the traffic is down.

    Speaking of social and search, Google’s release of its own social network Google+ was another significant move during the year. Clay told us that it doesn’t have a big impact on search at this point, but he suspects it will.

    In terms of the other search engines, Clay said that Bing has held its own during the year. Microsoft and Yahoo collectively appear to be growing in search share, but Clay said he thinks the reason is because Ask and AOL have lost some.

    Looking ahead to 2012

    Going forward into 2012, Clay has several predictions. For starters, he believes that Google Panda will continue. In fact, he said that the image should be changed to a polar bear instead of a panda because it would get meaner and more aggressive.

    “Google is in the business of making money,” he said. “Everybody needs to recognize that Google is a money generator.”

    For this reason, he believes that Google will also integrate Google+ into search in 2012. A few years ago, Google went from a “one size fits all” approach with search to personalized search results. In order to make these results geared more toward individuals instead of groups of people, Clay explained that Google+ would give the search giant this ability.

    “The best way to get your history is to just watch you and, I think, Google+ is that tool,” he said.

    “It is entirely within reason for Google, every time you login to Google+, for them to know where you are,” he added.

    As far as the other search engines go, Clay told us that Bing has good technology and that it would grow, especially in light of its partnerships with both Facebook and Mozilla.

    While some have already written Yahoo out of the search market, Clay said that Yahoo would remain a leader in the space. According to him, it’s out of the spidering business but not the search or algorithm business.

    “It’s kind of hard to criticize a company that only did a billion dollars in business,” he pointed out.

    In addition, Clay said that local search would continue to grow in 2012. Due to this growth, he thinks the search engines will begin to monetize it through a concept called local paid inclusion. He said it would be similar to Yahoo’s Search Submit Pro and that the companies would pay to get included in the top of the search results.

    Clay thinks the premium listing will have a call tracking system associated with it that would work like PPC ads work. For instance, if the number is clicked, the company pays the search engine. Based on past trends, he believes that Bing and Yahoo will offer this service before Google. He said that Google typically watches services from other companies and then develops their own version of it.

    Clay said we could expect this element as soon as January and believes so strongly in the concept that Bruce Clay Inc. is already preparing to offer services in this area.

    According to Clay’s predictions for 2012, the year looks to be just as interesting as 2011. Do you agree?

    What do you think the search industry will hold for 2012? Will it be as “disruptive” as 2011? Please comment.

  • Google’s Matt Cutts Does Some Myth Busting

    Google’s Matt Cutts Does Some Myth Busting

    Matt Cutts, Google’s head of webspam, wrote a post on his personal blog telling people to beware of comments appearing on blogs and different sites around the web claiming to be from him when they’re really not.

    “A lot of the time, I dispel misconceptions by leaving comments on blogs,” he writes. “That works great, except for the rare occasion when someone pretends to be me and leaves a rude, fake, or otherwise untrue blog comment. Over the previous decade, I’ve only seen 4-5 times where someone impersonated me. But in the last month, I’ve seen at least three nasty comments written by ‘fake Matt Cutts’ impersonators.”

    He points to a couple of recent examples, including one where the impostor said Google uses the credit card numbers of AdWords advertisers as a “strong signal” in organic search.

    Cutts is telling people to verify the legitimacy of the comments made by people claiming to be him on Twitter, if they’re at all skeptical.

    “The web isn’t built to prevent impersonation,” he says. “On many places around the web, anyone can leave a comment with someone else’s name. So if you see a comment that claims to be from me, but makes crazy claims (e.g. that we preference AdWords advertisers in our search results), let me know. I’m happy to verify whether I wrote a comment, e.g. with a tweet.”

    He has indeed been doing some myth busting on Twitter today, including tweeting out a video addressing that classic about giving preference to advertisers:

    Today’s video: If I buy AdWords, will that cause my algorithmic search rankings to rise? http://t.co/NUDJrWWf Definitive no. 1 hour ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto

    @dburks_CW consider me the Snopes to pop that misguided theory. 🙂 40 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    @Rich_Bendelow or restated: “Billboards can raise awareness of your site & lead to more search traffic” Yet no billboards in algo either. 🙂 39 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    “The answer is no,” he says in the video. “You don’t get any benefit in Google’s organic or editorial search rankings if you decide to buy AdWords. There’s no boosts. There’s nothing going on in the algorithm there, where if you buy AdWords, you will rank higher in Google’s organic search results. So don’t count on that.”

    When someone asked Cutts on Twitter how they knew his tweet really came from him, he replied: “Because now you have a verified tweet. Please don’t make me do a video to verify the tweet.”

  • Twitter, Organic Links & The Elderly

    Twitter, Organic Links & The Elderly

    Today’s infographic round-up features an ode to the organic link from SEOBook, a look at whether or not you should be using Twitter, and how we care for our disabled and elderly.

    View more daily infographic round-ups here.

    Should you use Twitter? (Flowtown via AllTwitter):

    Should you use Twitter

    An ode to the organic link:

    How Google Hit Organic Links.

    SEO Infographic by SEO Book

    Our GoFigure infographic looks at the results of a Gallup poll of caregivers who also have a full- or part-time job.
    Source:LiveScience

  • Google Goggles Gets An Upgrade on Android

    Google announced some improvements to Google Goggles for Android with a new update it’s made available for all Android devices – version 1.7.

    The new features include: continuous mode, improved text recognition, and contributed results.

    “Continuous mode is a quick and easy new way to use Goggles,” says Google software engineer David Petrou. “You can now get results instantly without having to take a picture – no shutter press required! Goggles will scan the scene continuously so you don’t need to worry about taking multiple pictures. The new continuous mode works best with books, products, artwork, and landmarks. Snapshot mode is still available, and has some tricks that aren’t in continuous mode yet, including translating text and adding a contact. Also, images recognized in continuous mode sessions won’t show up in your Goggles Search History, so if you’d like to refer back to something, such as a painting in a gallery you should use snapshot mode.”

    continuous mode in google goggles

    “Starting today, when Goggles recognizes a portion of text, you’ll get results that have a close match to the text you’ve scanned,” he continues. “Let’s say you’re reading a magazine article you really like and want to share it with your friends. Just point Goggles at a part of the page, and instantly find a link to an online version to share immediately or read again later. You won’t even need the entire article in the frame. Goggles will also pull up more information from pages around the web where that text is mentioned, so its easier to learn about what you’re seeing.”

    magazine scanning with google goggles

    In terms of user contributions, Google says hundreds of thousands of submissions have already been made to Google Goggles. With the update, if you suggest a better result for something, it could become a result for the next user who searches for a similar object, the company says.

    Not much more info is given on how this is policed for abuse.

    Note: the continuous mode doesn’t work in versions of Android older than 2.3.

  • Matt Cutts Sheds More Light On Google’s Quality Raters Process

    Matt Cutts Sheds More Light On Google’s Quality Raters Process

    Internet marketer Jennifer Ledbetter (otherwise known as PotPieGirl) wrote a post last month about the Google Quality Raters (you know, those people Google’s Matt Cutts and Amit Singhal talked about in that famous Wired interview about the Panda update, which look at search results and rate the quality, giving their feedback to the company).

    In that post, she wrote, “Now this makes sense to me – ONE rater can not cause a rankings change. However, I do believe that if a certain percentage of raters mark one url as spam or non-relevant, that it does throw up some type of flag in the system that can cause something to happen to that url. Now I naturally do not KNOW this, but I get that sneaky feeling.”

    Cutts responded today in the comments of the post to “dispel a misconception”. That “sneaky feeling,” he says, is “unfounded.”

    “Even if multiple search quality raters mark something as spam or non-relevant, that doesn’t affect a site’s rankings or throw up a flag in the url that would affect that url,” he says.

    In response to Jon Cooper, commenting on that post, Cutts goes on to say:

    The search quality raters sit in the “evaluation” part of search quality and they assess whether a new potential search ranking algorithm is a good idea or not. When they rate something as spam or not, we use that data to answer questions like “If we launch algorithm A, will spam go up or not?” or “Has our quality/spam gone up recently?”

    But the search quality raters are strictly “read-only”–they don’t directly affect our rankings in any way. If you think about it, you definitely wouldn’t want to spamfight on the same queries that you’re using to evaluate your quality: you’d get skewed quality metrics as a result.

    To be clear, Google does reserve the right to take manual action on spam. But that action happens in the webspam team, which is completely separate from the evaluation team and the search quality raters.

    PotPieGirl wrote a follow-up post discussing Cutts’ “debunking” of her other post. Someone named Steve commented on that post, saying, “It’s a safe bet that if raters flag a site for spam they turn it over to the spam team.”

    Cutts stepped up again to debunk just a little bit more, responding, “No, that’s a very bad bet, because it’s not true. If search quality raters rate a site as spam, it’s not sent over to the webspam team. Please see what I replied to Jon Cooper: you don’t want to spamfight on the data you use for metrics, or else you’ll get skewed metrics.”

    Google gave us a brief glimpse of the quality raters in this video earlier this year:

    I do mean glimpse.

    We gotta hand it to PotPieGirl for getting Cutts talking about this.

    @potpiegirl No worries–happy to clarify that point. 14 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Update: After this article was initially published, Cutts pointed out in a tweet that the topic also came up in a recent panel he participated in:

    @CCrum237 your article at http://t.co/17FcltBR reminded me that we touched on this during our Churchill Club panel & made me find it. 🙂 9 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Here’s the video from that:

  • Google Supports New Markup for Multilingual Content

    Google is supporting a new markup for multilingual content. It’s designed to improve handling of the following two scenarios, as described by the company:

    Multiregional websites using substantially the same content. Example: English webpages for Australia, Canada and USA, differing only in price

    Multiregional websites using fully translated content, or substantially different monolingual content targeting different regions. Example: a product webpage in German, English and French

    The support is an expansion of the rel=”alternate” hreflang link element. Google says it has expanded it to handle content that is translated or provided for multiple geogrhapic regions.

    “The hreflang attribute can specify the language, optionally the country, and URLs of equivalent content,” the company explains on the Webmaster Central blog. “By specifying these alternate URLs, our goal is to be able to consolidate signals for these pages, and to serve the appropriate URL to users in search. Alternative URLs can be on the same site or on another domain.”

    You can always use re=”canonical” for pages that have the same content in the same language that are aimed at different countries.

    “We’ll use that signal to focus on that version in search, while showing the local URLs to users where appropriate,” the company says. “For example, you could use this if you have the same product page in German, but want to target it separately to users searching on the Google properties for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.”

    Google looks at some examples of when to use the new markup here. They also have a help center article about the markup here.

  • Bing Rewards: New Offerings, Revamped Redemption Center

    Bing announced the launch of a new Bing Rewrds redemption center, as well as some new rewards and lower prices on some items.

    Along with this, all rewards are now delivered by email in less than 24 hours. They have also made the checkout process easier by eliminating half of the steps between signing in and checking out.

    “Based on member requests, we’ve also added three great new brands—Redbox, Groupon and Tango Card—and we’re adding Boys and Girls Clubs of America as a charity you can donate your credits to,” says Bing Product Marketing Manager Alex Danskin. “We’re still offering our most popular rewards and 100 Microsoft Points for Xbox 360 and $5 Amazon Gift Cards* are both being cut in price.”

    The current list of rewards is as follows:

    100 Microsoft Points for Xbox 360
    Xbox Live 1 month gold membership
    $2.50 and $5 Amazon gift cards
    Hulu Plus 1 month subscriptions
    Redbox free one-day DVD rentals
    $5 Groupon gift cards
    $5 Tango cards
    $5 Chegg Textbook rental gift codes
    $5 Cramster coupon codes
    Bing Rewards monthly sweepstakes
    $5 DonorsChoose.org gift cards
    $1 to Kids in Need
    $1 to Teach for America
    $1 to Boys and Girls Clubs of America

    “The addition of the Tango Card to our redemption center gives our members extra flexibility,” says Danskin. “Recipients can select from top brands like iTunes, Target, Home Depot, Starbucks and Nike, just to name a few. They can also donate any portion of their card to charities, or redeem any unused balance for cash. Plus, Tango Card offers free apps to manage gift cards from a mobile device. So users can check gift card balances in one place and use gift cards from their mobile devices in-store or online.”

    The Tango Card app can be downloaded here.

  • SEMPO: FTC Shouldn’t Regulate Google and Other Search Engines

    As companies continue to call for regulation of Google, search industry organization SEMPO has come to the search engine’s defense. The Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization recently sent a letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz in an effort to explain why regulation is not a good idea.

    According to SEMPO President Chris Boggs, the organization, which is made up of thousands of marketing professionals across 50 countries, wrote the letter in response to its members’ concerns. SEMPO felt it needed to voice these concerns and explain why its members want an “open, free channel of communication.”

    Are you concerned that the government will change the Internet as we know it? Let us know your thoughts.

    “Overall, the reason that we felt we needed to send this letter was because we were concerned specifically that the U.S. government is investigating the search operations of Google,” said Boggs.

    “It’s not just because we felt we needed to go thank our sponsor, Google,” he added.

    The letter calls for a free market approach to the Internet with little or no regulation. It focuses on Google, however, in light of the anticompetitive claims that ShopCity and others have made lately.

    Although Boggs does not discredit ShopCity’s claims, he pointed that all businesses are subject to the same rules for both organic search and paid search. In addition, he believes the accusations would have a greater impact if the Google naysayers outnumbered the Google advocates. However, judging from SEMPO’s members, they do not.

    “I would want to see a much larger sample of companies saying that it’s unfair, versus the large sample that I’ve seen that have spoken to us and messaged to the board of SEMPO their pro-support of Google and the way they do handle business,” said Boggs.

    The letter makes clear that search engines were not intended to be regulated or subject to control from governments or commercial entities, saying:

    Search is not a government-run utility, established by law and thus subject to bureaucratic oversight. It is a service provided to consumers and businesses by companies, which have set up their operations using their own principles, proprietary technologies and algorithms. Each company is free to develop its own approach, fulfilling the needs of its customers as it perceives them.”

    It makes the case that a free market methodology is what made the Internet what it is today. As Boggs explained, this freedom has allowed the Internet to grow and produce platforms such as social networks.

    “If we hadn’t allowed the growth of Facebook and Twitter, and even some of its forbearers like MySpace, we would be nowhere close to where we are now in terms of the ability to communicate and reconnect with old friends on the Internet, for example, and also to perform business,” he said.

    In order to further this free market innovation, the SEMPO letter stated that the following 4 requirements were needed:

    1. Willingness of legislative and regulatory government entities worldwide to allow the evolution of the Internet in as unfettered a regulatory environment as possible

    2. Willingness of publishers and information owners to explore ways of sharing their valuable information with the search engines while not jeopardizing their revenue models

    3. Consumers feeling a level of trust with search engines sufficient to allow the search engines to personalize results for them, maintaining privacy settings at a level comfortable to them

    4. Understanding by marketers and advertisers that the search engines’ most valuable asset is the user, and therefore the search engines will often place the consumer experience above short-term financial gain

    Although SEMPO has not received a response from the FTC, Boggs said that the organization was willing to work with it to help it further understand how the search industry works.

    In terms of regulation, Boggs told us that he didn’t see any coming in 2012 but that he could see it happening in 2015 or 2016. If it does happen, Boggs said he hopes that it protects the innocent from potentially harmful content online instead of preventing a free Internet.

  • Google Panda Update: Antitrust Connections Being Tossed Around

    Ah, the Google Panda update. The search story of the year. It just won’t leave the news will it?

    As recently reported, Google could be facing a massive fine over antitrust complaints in Europe. The European Commission is expected to issue Google a 400-page document talking about its alleged “abuse of dominance.”

    While in my opinion, it may be a bit of a stretch, a new Guardian article is drawing a connection from this to the Panda update. The piece talks about an Irritable Bowel Syndrome site that was hit by Panda back in February, and then jumps to:

    Any day now, the European commission is expected to announce whether it will formally object to what some see as Google’s abuse of its power in the way that it treats smaller sites that offer the same sorts of services as it does.

    If that happens, Google could be forced to comply with strictures on the way it treats rival sites offering particular sorts of search – for news, products, maps, shopping, images or videos – rather than pushing its own on the site. Alternatively, it could face fines of millions of pounds.

    The piece goes on to quote Adam Raff, co-founder of Foundem, a vertical search engine who has filed a complaint against Google:

    “Panda is a collection of disparate updates,” Raff says. She says that though panda was widely touted as an attack on content farms, “it also marks an aggressive escalation of Google’s war on rival vertical search services. First, vertical search services are in many ways the polar opposite of content farms” – because they link to multiple different sites, rather than containing content on one site.

    “Panda wasn’t just deployed in the midst of these investigations; we suggest that it was deployed in direct response to them. By bundling these diametrically opposed updates together, the ‘content farm’ elements could be viewed as providing cover for the vertical search targeted elements.”

    I guess that’s one point of view.

    While on the topic of Panda, a WebmasterWorld member (Content_ed) has an interesting story up about moving his good content from a Panda hit site to a site that was actually boosted by Panda.

    “I moved a half dozen pages that were drawing a few hundred visitors a day from Google on my Pandalized (down 80%) site to my Panda pleased (up over 300%) site this weekend,” he says. “It took a little over 24 hours for Google to start indexing the pages on the new site so I’m not sure if Monday results represent a full day. Of the half dozen pages, three were slightly above their pre-Panda level (year-over-year) on Monday, and three were around 20% under. The average Google traffic for the six pages Monday was around 250 visitors each.”

    It’s something to cosider, given HubPages’ strategy of subdomaining to separate out the better stuff.

    WebmasterWorld moderator Tedster had the following response to Content_ed’s post: “A lot may depend on the number of pages that each site contains. If you moved half a dozen pages to a domain that contains hundreds or thousands of other pages, you may see no changes with future Panda iterations. There’s also a chance, since Panda has a site-wide influence, that these pages were not the source of the Panda problem on their original domain. In which case, you made an excellent move.”

    With that, I’ll leave you with an infographic about Panda from Cognitive SEO:

  • Google As A Graphing Calculator

    Google has introduced some graphing calculator functionality to its search results.

    “Students and math lovers can now plot mathematical functions right on the search result page,” a Google spokesperson tells WebProNews. “Just type in a function and you’ll see an interactive graph on the top of the search results page — or will be able to soon, once this rolls out to all users over the coming days.”

    Here’s an example of what you could see:

    Google graphing

    You can zoom in and out or pan across the plane. Users can also draw multiple functions. Do this by separating them with commas.

    “This feature covers an extensive range of single variable functions including trigonometric, exponential, logarithmic and their compositions, and is available in modern browsers,” says Google engineer Adi Avidor.

    Google has been pretty helpful as a calculator in the past, particularly with Chrome’s omnibox. When you’re using the web, it’s even easier than opening up your computer’s calculator application. Now, Google’s just getting better as a math tool.

  • Report Suggests Mozilla and Google Are Done

    Back in October, Mozilla introduced Firefox with Bing. This may have been a sign of things to come.

    Ed Bott at ZDnet has put out an interesting report indicating that Mozilla’s deal with Google ended in November, and questions Mozilla’s future without the money it gets from that, and the increasing popularity of Google’s competing browser. He writes:

    A search partnership with Google has historically been Mozilla’s greatest source of income. In its most recent financial statement, prepared in August and published recently online (see this PDF copy), the Mozilla Foundation won’t even mention Google’s name…

    He points to this passage from that document:

    The Corporation has a contract with a search engine provider for royalties which expires November 2011. Approximately 84% and 86% of royalty revenue for 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from this contract.

    You know who would probably love to snag a nice chunk of search market share by being the default search option on a popular browser? Microsoft is certainly not shy about pumping money into its search business, and the fact that there is already a Firefox with Bing shows that they’re not shy about teaming up with a competitor. It could be a small price to pay. There’s a lot more money in search.

    Earlier this week, we looked at a report from Statcounter indicating that Chrome has overtaken Firefox for the first time in terms of users. Microsoft is surely not blind to that upward Chrome trend either (or the downward IE trend). And now Google is even advertising Chrome on TV (not to mention pushing an operating system based on it).

    Source: StatCounter Global Stats – Browser Market Share

    So far, there’s nothing out to my knowledge indicating that Microsoft is pursuing replacement of Google’s contract with Mozilla, but we’re certainly not the only ones considering this to be a distinct possibility.

    MG Siegler writes, “But because Firefox has a huge user base, this is something that Microsoft would have to consider. Such a deal could potentially finally turn Bing from a multi-billion dollar suck hole into an actual business.”

    Ouch.

    A deal with Mozilla would help for sure. I still think they could be doing more to leverage their uber-popular Xbox to further Bing’s cause.

    The Mozilla situation will be one to keep an eye on for sure. Will it be able to compete with those who have their own mobile operating systems?

  • Google Algorithm Updates: The Latest Things To Consider

    Google has been making a big deal about wanting to be more transparent about its search algorithm lately (without revealing the secret sauce too much of course). And so far, I have to say they’re making good on that promise fairly well.

    Is Google being transparent enough for your liking? Let us know in the comments.

    We’ve seen plenty of algorithmic announcements made from the company over the course of the year. In November, they discussed ten recent changes they had made. Here’s a recap of those:

    • Cross-language information retrieval updates: For queries in languages where limited web content is available (Afrikaans, Malay, Slovak, Swahili, Hindi, Norwegian, Serbian, Catalan, Maltese, Macedonian, Albanian, Slovenian, Welsh, Icelandic), we will now translate relevant English web pages and display the translated titles directly below the English titles in the search results. This feature was available previously in Korean, but only at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the translated titles will take you to pages translated from English into the query language.
    • Snippets with more page content and less header/menu content: This change helps us choose more relevant text to use in snippets. As we improve our understanding of web page structure, we are now more likely to pick text from the actual page content, and less likely to use text that is part of a header or menu.
    • Better page titles in search results by de-duplicating boilerplate anchors: We look at a number of signals when generating a page’s title. One signal is the anchor text in links pointing to the page. We found that boilerplate links with duplicated anchor text are not as relevant, so we are putting less emphasis on these. The result is more relevant titles that are specific to the page’s content.
    • Length-based autocomplete predictions in Russian: This improvement reduces the number of long, sometimes arbitrary query predictions in Russian. We will not make predictions that are very long in comparison either to the partial query or to the other predictions for that partial query. This is already our practice in English.
    • Extending application rich snippets: We recently announced rich snippets for applications. This enables people who are searching for software applications to see details, like cost and user reviews, within their search results. This change extends the coverage of application rich snippets, so they will be available more often.
    • Retiring a signal in Image search: As the web evolves, we often revisit signals that we launched in the past that no longer appear to have a significant impact. In this case, we decided to retire a signal in Image Search related to images that had references from multiple documents on the web.
    • Fresher, more recent results: As we announced just over a week ago, we’ve made a significant improvement to how we rank fresh content. This change impacts roughly 35 percent of total searches (around 6-10% of search results to a noticeable degree) and better determines the appropriate level of freshness for a given query.
    • Refining official page detection: We try hard to give our users the most relevant and authoritative results. With this change, we adjusted how we attempt to determine which pages are official. This will tend to rank official websites even higher in our ranking.
    • Improvements to date-restricted queries: We changed how we handle result freshness for queries where a user has chosen a specific date range. This helps ensure that users get the results that are most relevant for the date range that they specify.
    • Prediction fix for IME queries: This change improves how Autocomplete handles IME queries (queries which contain non-Latin characters). Autocomplete was previously storing the intermediate keystrokes needed to type each character, which would sometimes result in gibberish predictions for Hebrew, Russian and Arabic.

    Now, they’ve put out a similar post on the Inside Search Blog, revealing ten more that have been made since than post.

    We just announced another ten algorithmic changes we’ve made! Read more here: http://t.co/VYIow0z8 33 minutes ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto

    Google lists them as follows:

    • Related query results refinements: Sometimes we fetch results for queries that are similar to the actual search you type. This change makes it less likely that these results will rank highly if the original query had a rare word that was dropped in the alternate query. For example, if you are searching for [rare red widgets], you might not be as interested in a page that only mentions “red widgets.”
    • More comprehensive indexing: This change makes more long-tail documents available in our index, so they are more likely to rank for relevant queries.
    • New “parked domain” classifier: This is a new algorithm for automatically detecting parked domains. Parked domains are placeholder sites that are seldom useful and often filled with ads. They typically don’t have valuable content for our users, so in most cases we prefer not to show them.
    • More autocomplete predictions: With autocomplete, we try to strike a balance between coming up with flexible predictions and remaining true to your intentions. This change makes our prediction algorithm a little more flexible for certain queries, without losing your original intention.
    • Fresher and more complete blog search results: We made a change to our blog search index to get coverage that is both fresher and more comprehensive.
    • Original content: We added new signals to help us make better predictions about which of two similar web pages is the original one.
    • Live results for Major League Soccer and the Canadian Football League: This change displays the latest scores & schedules from these leagues along with quick access to game recaps and box scores.
    • Image result freshness: We made a change to how we determine image freshness for news queries. This will help us find the freshest images more often.
    • Layout on tablets: We made some minor color and layout changes to improve usability on tablet devices.
    • Top result selection code rewrite: This code handles extra processing on the top set of results. For example, it ensures that we don’t show too many results from one site (“host crowding”). We rewrote the code to make it easier to understand, simpler to maintain and more flexible for future extensions.

    Seeing just these 20 tweaks listed all together, as changes that have just been made in the past month or so, really puts it into perspective just how much Google is adjusting the algorithm. That doesn’t even include the integration of Flight Search results announced after these updates.

    Google also points to the recently launched Verbatim tool, the updated search app for the iPad and the new Google bar as other recent changes to be aware of regarding Google search.

    Google says all the time that it makes over 500 changes to its algorithm each year, and that it has over 200 signals it uses to rank results. There is always a possibility that one of these changes or signals can have a major impact on your site, as many have found out this past year with the Panda update.

    Even a huge company like Yahoo is at the mercy of Google’s algorithm when it comes to search visibility, and they just finally made some big adjustments with Associate Content, not unlike what Demand Media has done this year.

    Last month, Google also indicated that it is testing algorithm changes that will look more what appears above the fold of a webpage.

    We’re getting close to a new year, and there’s no reason to expect Google’s changes to slow down. Google has been clear, however, that it aims to be more transparent about when these changes occur, and what those changes are. Granted, this transparency will only go so far, because Google will not make all of its signals known, and leave their results too open for gaming. That wouldn’t be good for anybody (except maybe Google’s competitors).

    Google does say that these lists of algorithm changes are now a monthly series.

    What do you think about the latest changes? Good or bad? Let us know in the comments.

  • Google Flight Search Integrated Into Search Results

    Google Flight Search Integrated Into Search Results

    Google announced that it is now showing flight info right in Google search results on certain flight related searches. This is an extension of the company’s Flight Search feature introduced back in September.

    Flight Search was initially available via the left-hand navigation bar on the SERPs, but now they’ll just be the default search experience when Google thinks that’s what you’re looking for.

    “ For example, if you search for [flights from San Francisco to Las Vegas] you’ll see a table that shows available flights, including duration and prices. You can adjust dates on the page, or click any flight to further research and book your trip,” says Emmet Connolly, UX designer on Google’s Flight Search feature.

    google flight search results

    “Over the next couple days, you’ll start to see the flight results appear for searches whose origins and destinations are currently supported by our Flight Search feature,” adds Connolly. “ In the short term, those results are limited to domestic US flights. The flight schedule feature will continue to provide information about nonstop routes around the world and across 11 languages.”

    That can be found here.

    Google has quickly become much more useful for those flying around the U.S. Here’s the video Google released when it introduced Flight Search:

    This week, Google also introduced interior Airport maps.

    Of course, airports aren’t the only places where Google is doing interior maps.

  • Google Could Face Massive Fine Over Antitrust Complaint in Europe

    Google may face a fine “up to 10% of its annual turnover” if a report from dealReporter, published by Financial Times is accurate.

    That is, reportedly, if Google can’t settle with the European Commission in an antitrust investigation stemming from complaints initially made by search engines Ciao, Foundem and eJustice, but which also now include perspectives from 1plusV, VfT, Elfvoetbal, Hotmaps, Interactive Labs, nnpt.it, dealdujour.pro, and of course Microsoft. Twenga is also expected to file a complaint.

    The report indicates, based on “sources close to the case,” that the EC will issue a 400-page statement of objections covering the allegations of Google’s “abuse of dominance”.

    Yes, 400 pages.

    Google Executive Chairman and former CEO Eric Schmidt, the report says, is expected to meet with Commissioner Joaquín Almunia to discuss Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility,which raises a whole other slew of questions about Google’s competitive practices outside of the search industry (though there is certainly plenty of crossover).

    Google has of course faced plenty of scrutiny here in the states regarding its competitive practices. That includes hearings with the Senate Antitrust Committee and scrutiny from the DoJ and FTC.

    In June, the company put out a blog post discussing five principles that “will stand up” to scrutiny related to competition. The post was in response to the FTC, but the points summarize Google’s general view of the topic:

    • Do what’s best for the user. We make hundreds of changes to our algorithms every year to improve your search experience. Not every website can come out at the top of the page, or even appear on the first page of our search results.
    • Provide the most relevant answers as quickly as possible. Today, when you type “weather in Chicago” or “how many feet in a mile” into our search box, you get the answers directly—often before you hit “enter”. And we’re always trying to figure out new ways to answer even more complicated questions just as clearly and quickly. Advertisements offer useful information, too, which is why we also work hard to ensure that our ads are relevant to you.
    • Label advertisements clearly. Google always distinguishes advertisements from our organic search results. As we experiment with new ad formats and new types of content, we will continue to be transparent about what is an ad and what isn’t.
    • Loyalty, not lock-in. We firmly believe you control your data, so we have a team of engineers whose only goal is to help you take your information with you. We want you to stay with us because we’re innovating and making our products better—not because you’re locked in.

    And of course, Google always like to play the “competition is only a click away” card.

  • Yahoo Gets Rid of 75,000 Associated Content Articles, Launches Yahoo Voices

    Yahoo has now decided to follow Demand Media’s lead by deleting 75,000 articles from Associated Content, and is even going so far as to change Associated Content new a new network called Yahoo Voices.

    In a post on Yahoo’s Yodel Anecdotal blog, the company says “We have retired more than 75,000 pieces of inactive and outdated content from Associated Content. None of this content will appear on Yahoo! Voices, and only content that meets our revised Submission Guidelines will be accepted moving forward. Older content that does not meet these standards will be gradually retired or returned to the original author for editing.”

    This is obviously a reaction (albeit a very late reaction) to Google’s Panda update, which itself has been updated various times throughout the year, and will likely continue to be tweaked. I’m sure you know the story if you’re reading this. If not, you can find our past coverage here.

    Demand Media ended up deleting around 300,000 articles from eHow, and seems to have been doing ok since (though they did implement a broader quality clean-up initiative and put a greater emphasis on social).

    Here’s an email that Yahoo has sent out to writers:

    We’re writing to notify you about some important changes to Yahoo! Contributor Network and our digital library of content.

    First, allow us to introduce Yahoo! Voices: a new online home for millions of pieces of content created by our community of experts and enthusiasts.

    Yahoo! Voices (http://voices.yahoo.com) replaces Associated Content as the official digital library of Yahoo! Contributor Network. Most content formerly published on Associated Content will now be found on the new site, andassociatedcontent.com URLs will automatically redirect to the corresponding pieces on voices.yahoo.com. You’ll now see Yahoo! Voices in place of Associated Content on your profile page, Account page, and Content menu as well.

    We’re also pleased to announce these important changes in connection with the launch of Yahoo! Voices:

    New Submission Guidelines: Today we are releasing revised Submission Guidelines, which better clarify what we’re seeking: unique content containing authentic perspectives from experts, enthusiasts, and citizen journalists, to complement Yahoo!’s broader editorial offerings. Read the new guidelines here.

    Editing and retiring content: The above guidelines apply to new and existing content. Any published content that does not meet these standards may be returned for editing or retired. We ask that you review your own library to identify content that doesn’t meet our new guidelines, is outdated, or simply isn’t something you’re proud to call your best work. We’ve added two new options to our content flag tool. “Flagging my own content for retirement” will, pending editors’ review, remove that content from the site (without affecting your accumulated page views, pending Performance Bonus, or Clout score). “Flagging my own content for edits” will prompt us to return the content to you so that you can update and resubmit it.

    “Yahoo! Style Guide” giveaway: The “Yahoo! Style Guide” is the ultimate guide to best practices in online content creation, and it has already become invaluable to many contributors. We’ve sent style guides to hundreds of contributors so far, and to celebrate the launch of Yahoo! Voices, we’re spreading the knowledge further. If you haven’t received a style guide from us already and you live in the US, those of you with more than 10 published articles who also publish a new article before the end of the year will receive an invitation to claim a free copy. Don’t miss your chance to get this amazing resource for free!

    Additional information:

    On the blog: Associated Content founder and Yahoo! VP Luke Beatty discusses the launch of Yahoo! Voices, and how we got here.

    Yahoo! Voices FAQ: Learn more about how this launch may affect you.

    If you notice any technical issues in connection with this launch, please contact us.

    Thank you for helping us reach this milestone! We’re excited to provide an even better place to showcase your unique voice on Yahoo!. Check out Yahoo! Voices now.

    Sincerely,

    Yahoo! Contributor Network

    Some writers were wondering why they hadn’t been getting assignments from Yahoo lately. That would explain it.

  • Matt Cutts, Bendable Robots & A Land-Walking Octopus

    Today’s video round-up comes with some advice from Google, some interesting animals, and of course a robot.

    View more daily video round-ups here.

    Google’s Matt Cutts takes on the topic: “Will my site’s ranking be hurt if I use HTTPS instead of HTTP?

    That is one soft robot (more on this here):

    Do CEOs suffer from social paralysis?

    Octopus walks on land:

    A talking porcupine:

    Neato:


    The new Path (discussed more here):

    Path 2 – Share Life from Path on Vimeo.

    Phantom cocktails:

    Phantom Cocktails from Ty Migota on Vimeo.

    Brian Williams stays cool during the fire alarm:

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    Say hello to Spotify apps (more on this here):