WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • TwitVid Rebrands As Telly, Aims To Solve The Video Discovery Problem

    TwitVid, the service once known as the go-to destination for uploading videos to share on Twitter, has rebranded itself as Telly, and now has much bigger ambitions.

    WebProNews spoke with TwitVid and Telly founder Mo Adham about the launch. He tells us that the goal is to “solve the problem of video discovery.”

    You may not have any trouble discovering videos on YouTube, but Telly goes far beyond that, including videos from YouTube, Hulu, CNN, and ESPN, not to mention Twitvid’s own 10-million strong library and others. Eventually, Adham tells us, more videos from the web at large will be included. So some day in the not too distant future, you may find our own hosted WPN videos, for example, when you use Telly’s search feature.

    “iPhones and Android devices have caused an exponential growth in the amount of video published on the web,” says Adham. “How can users find great video to watch, and how do video creators, both big and small, reach relevant viewers when over 100 hours of video is uploaded every minute? This is a big problem that we understand well, and today Telly is taking the first step in reshaping how online video is viewed and distributed in today’s world.”

    Like TwitVid, Telly is much more than just a way to search for videos. It’s something of a social network. You can share videos with friends, discover videos from friends, and collect videos that you come across, storing them for easy access from your profile. But don’t worry. You don’t need another social media account. You just sign in with Facebook or Twitter.

    TwitVid has typically been more associated with Twitter, but Telly comes with Facebook Timeline integration. As we’ve seen with other apps, that can provide a tremendous boost to user adoption. It will be interesting to see how Telly is able to take advantage.

    The service lets you follow specific people, as well as interests. There is a main stream and an activity feed (similar to Facebook). In the activity feed, you can see things like “Matt Forte watched 5 videos”:

    Telly feed

    Of course, you can always post your own videos directly to Telly.

    Last year, TwitVid launched a major redesign, turning itself into less the place to upload videos for Twitter, and more into a YouTube alternative. Telly seems to be the next evolutionary step for the service, and is perhaps the most promising. Getting the “Twit” out of the name should only help the company establish itself as its own entity, and not scare away non-Twitter users and people who simply associate the service with Twitter.

    Telly is ultimately the product of two acquisitions TwitVid recently made: Cull.tv and Frugalo. The former is an online video service, which will be phased out, and the latter was actually a daily deals service. Don’t expect any daily deals from Telly though. This was only a talent acquisition, Adham tells us.

    Telly has been designed with the living room in mind, but later this year, Adham tells us, mobile and tablet apps will be on the way.

    You can access Telly at Telly.com. TwitVid will eventually redirect to Telly. Adham says they’re slowly shifting it over.

    The company is based in San Francisco, and is backed by Azure Capital Partners and Draper Fisher Jurvetson.

  • Facebook Shares Better Than Links For Google Ranking?

    Searchmetrics released a new study finding that the volume of Facebook shares a web page receives is closely correlated with how high it ranks in Google searches. “At the same time, too many Google AdSense ads on a page are likely to have a negative effect on search visibility,” a representative for Searchmetrics tells WebProNews.

    “The study analyzed search results from Google for 10,000 popular keywords and 300,000 websites in order to pick out the issues that correlate with a high Google ranking,” the representative explains. “The findings come at a critical time when many websites, as you know, try to recover or make sense of the recent Google updates like Penguin and Panda.”

    According to the study, some of the top factor categories that correlate most highly with a successful Google ranking are:

    1. Facebook Shares
    2. Number of Backlinks
    3. Tweets

    Ranking Factors in the US

    Ranking Factors UK

    The firm highlights the following as key findings:

    1. Social media signals show very high correlation with high rankings

    2. Top brands appear to have a ranking advantage

    3. Too much advertising is a handicap

    4. Quantity of links is still important but quality is vital

    5. Keyword domains still frequently attract top results

    Social Media And Search Rankings

    There’s been a lot of talk about how social media’s impact on search this week, with industry conference SMX Advanced having taken place. It’s interesting to see this study site Facebook shares and Tweets as major signals. It’s not incredibly surprising, given that these are two of the Internet’s major social networks, but it is interesting that they top Google’s own Google+.

    At SMX, Google’s Matt Cutts spoke briefly about the +1 button and Google+ as they relate to SEO. SMX’s Danny Sullivan asked him about the topic, and he said (according to a liveblog), “When we look at +1, we’ve found it’s not necessarily the best quality signal right now.”

    Sullivan asked Cutts if you have to be on Google+ to rank well in Google. According to the liveblog, his response was, “No!!!! It’s still early days on how valuable the Google+ data will be.”

    That’s not to say that Google+ isn’t important to search, and if Google has its way, it will likely only grow in importance.

    Here’s an excerpt from the study about Google+:

    Social media signals show extremely high correlation: social signals from Facebook, Twitter and Google+ are frequently associated with good rankings in Google’s index.

    A note on Google+: analyzing Google +1s with a Spearman correlation, we found a significant result of 0.41. From this we can assume that the quantity of +1s has the strongest correlation of any of the metrics analyzed in the study.

    However, we have not included this figure in the overview because we consider it to be too unreliable. This is because Google+ does not currently have enough users and the possibility of a +1 leading directly to changes in SERPs follows accordingly, since pages receive +1s in the order that they would already be placed without them. When Google+ has values that are stronger and more independent from SERPs, these values will also be included in the overview. That Google is trying to make Google+ an important player is indisputable and therefore SEOs should be sure to keep an eye on further developments.

    Then there’s the fact that your Google+ profile is still directly tied to authorship in Google, and that helps you search visibility. It’s also heavily used in Google’s personalized results (Search Plus Your World), which we see all the time.

    Just don’t expect +1s to be as valuable as Facebook likes or tweets unless Google+ growth gets to Facebook or Twitter-like numbers.

    In fact, there was also some talk at SMX about Pinterest being a significant signal for Google. Even though the social network is still in its infancy, it’s gained a lot of popularity very quickly.

    Bing’s Duane Forrester, in discussing Penguin recovery, recently wrote, “It didn’t take long for the Pin It button to start popping up on websites. And it didn’t take a passing grade on the MENSA quiz to see it coming, did it? Rapid growth, huge adoption, media buzz, your friends recommending it, and so it goes. An exercise in obviousness that you’d better pay attention to this little gem.”

    Of course, the same session suggested that Google+ was a huge signal, beating out the others. Here are a couple of tweets straight from the session:

    Social Signals Test: G+ most, Facebook like least, twitter over time, Pinterest strong overall. @yerrbo #smx #11a
    1 day ago via Twitter for iPad · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Testing what social signals help with Google surprise, Google+ was huge, but also Pinterest seems to build good links @yerrbo #smx #11a
    1 day ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    Of course different signals will be stronger for different sites. It’s likely that any of them can play a significant role with enough engagement.

  • Google: WSJ Readers Don’t Think We’re A Monopoly

    The Wall Street Journal recently ran an editorial from Nextag CEO Jeffrey Katz, slamming Google’s business practices, and calling Google a monopoly.

    Google followed up the article with its own official response. We weighed in on the topic here.

    The Journal has put out a follow up in the Letters section, called: Google Isn’t a Monopoly, Given Other Customer Choices,” featuring comments from several readers. One professor points out how Google’s knol doesn’t show up in search results over Wikipedia.

    Another reader writes, “Contrary to the headline, only governments can award monopolies. The free market will punish Google soon enough if need be. Crybaby competitors should be ignored.”

    Another suggests that the idea of Google’s dominance being considered a monopoly is “ludicrous”.

    After seeing all of this, Google’s Adam Kovacevich tweeted:

    Since the Katz article, Apple has come out with some major announcements, including dropping Google as its local search provider, which should only help Google’s argument.

  • Google Gives You New Way To Link Your Site With Your Google+ Page

    Google+ Product Management Director Dennis Troper posted on Google+ that the company has made it easier for you to link your site to your Google+ Page.

    “When you link your website to your Google+ page, your recent posts can appear in lots of relevant places across Google,” he says. “For example: when users search for your brand, an excerpt from a recent Google+ post may appear to the right of search results.”

    Troper instructs page owners to visit their page, edit their profile, and click a new button called “Link Website” on the About tab, when you save your site URL. From there, you’ll be instructed to add some code to your site’s homepage. Then, click “Test Website”.

    The following screen caps show the process, and how your site will appear in search results:

    Link Site To Google+

    Link site to Google

    Link site to Google

    Here’s what the search results page would look like:

    Link site to Google

    Note that if you set it up right, you’ll get a confirmation message, and according to Troper, the link will be active within a day or two.

    If your’e still trying to figure out Google+, Google put out a twenty-minute video this week going over the basics, including its relationship with search. More on that here.

  • Google On How Users Can Build Networks For Search

    Google Developer Programs Tech Lead Maile Ohye posted a twenty-minute video about Google+ and the +1 button to the Webmaster Central blog today. For many of you, there’s not going to be a whole lot of new info. It’s really about the basics, and how it all works, apparently geared toward people who have yet to navigate the path that is Google+.

    While much of the video talks about the general features and functionality of Google+, eventually Ohye talks specifically about how it all plays into search. Again, there’s not much in the way of new information, but it does give another Google perspective about how it is using Google+ and +1s to show search results to users.

    “Because our goal is to return the most relevant results to users, it doesn’t matter if you participate in Google+ or not,” Ohye says. “You can completely ignore Google+ and all of that information and still do great with Search because it’s about returning the most relevant results.”

    She goes on to talk about Search Plus Your World, and how Google uses your Google+ Circles to show you results based on stuff people you “trust” have engaged with.

    Then, she gets into identity, which is really what it’s all about.

    “So, let’s take the concept of identity,” says Ohye. “Imagine you have a website here and it’s all in this blue box. And you have things like page A and page B. And then, instead of just having this website, you have more with identity because you have a Google+ badge that says that we have a Google+ page. And even more than that, you might have page A and say that page A actually tied to the identity of this author. And page B is tied to the identity of this author. So, rather than just a standalone website, you now have more identity with your Google+ page and two different author profiles. Once you have this identity established, you can really then start to build your reputation.”

    Speaking about a site, she says, “First of all, it might have more websites on the web linking to you. And that’s great and helps build your reputation. But additionally, because you have that Google+ page, you have people in Google+ that might be following your business. And then, you have people who follow the people who follow your business. And even furthermore, you might have a page like page A showing in search results. And that looks great. And you might have users who actually plus oned that content and say that they recommend it. And in addition to those users who liked that content, you have those who follow the users who liked that content. And you can see how this network starts to grow.”

    “You might have page A again and it also has an author, like Othar, who also works at Google–great guy. He might have wrote page A. And he also has people who follow him. So again, it’s creating this entire network and helping to build your site and your great reputation.

    “So, how does this work out for users in terms of their reaching the most relevant content?” asks Ohye. “Well, at the ranking time, it helps us to serve better, more tailored results because users can say, ‘Yes. I want this page.’ Or, ‘I agree with this page,’ and plus one it. It kind of develops your reputation. The next part after ranking is what the actual search result looks like on the page. And with this information, we can now highlight the utility of the result. So, your content can stand out by saying you have people plus one it and also by having great authors. And the last part, of course, is the click. And that’s where they come to your site and they find that useful information.”

    At SMX Advanced last week, Google’s Matt Cutts indicated that +1s aren’t the best quality signal.

  • Google Trends Hot Searches Sections Gets An Update

    Google announced today that it has redesigned the Hot Searches section of Google Trends. It groups related rising search terms together and shows more info about them in a more visually appealing way. See below:

    Hot Searches

    “With rich images and links to related news articles, you can glance at the list and instantly get an idea of why these topics are particularly hot at the moment and click to find out more about them,” says Nimrod Tamir from Google’s Trends Team. “Unlike the previous version of Hot Searches, which always provided 20 daily results, the new page introduces a filtering system that helps us make sure that the list includes only the truly hottest news stories of the day.”

    “Also, when a few of the fastest rising search terms refer to the same news story, such as [tony awards 2012] and [audra mcdonald], they’re now aggregated into one entry, which lists all the ‘Related searches’ that go along with the main story,” explains Tamir. “Lastly, the new list also provides an indication of how many searches have been conducted for each topic in the 24 hour period when it was trending.”

    Nimrod Tamir

    Finally!! New Hot Searches product in Google
    http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends

    Each of the main trends has buttons to share it on Google+, Twitter and Facebook, upon mouseover. For some reason the related searches aren’t clickable. It would be nice if these related searches showed the number of searches like the main trends, but overall, the page is more pleasing to look at now.

  • Local SEO Factors: Survey Attempts To Rank 90 Of Them

    Portland-based David Mihm Web Design put out the results of a big local search survey, attempting to rank the top 90 local search factors that influence a business’ local Google rankings. It’s an interesting list, but it’s hard to say just how accurate it is, as Google plays its rankings signals cards pretty close to its chest. That said, it has some pretty credible contributors. You can see the whole list (as well as all the results) here.

    There’s also the fact that the survey may lose its relevance sooner rather than later, as David Mihm acknowledges in the survey’s introduction.

    “Of course, all of this preceded the colossal sea change represented by the release of Google +Local on May 30,” he writes. “This release actually came just as the responses for this year’s survey started pouring in. Which means that although this year’s version is more likely to be outdated sooner than previous years, it will represent an incredibly valuable historical data point, and I’m already looking forward to looking at the differences in 2013’s survey.”

    Here’s the big list:

    1. Physical Address in City of Search (PLACE PAGE)
    2. Proper Category Associations (PLACE PAGE)
    3. Proximity of Address to Centroid (PLACE PAGE)
    4. Domain Authority of Website (WEBSITE)
    5. Quantity of Structured Citations (IYPs, Data Aggregators) (OFF-SITE)
    6. City, State in Places Landing Page Title (WEBSITE)
    7. Quantity of Native Google Places Reviews (w/text) (REVIEWS)
    8. Quality/Authority of Structured Citations (OFF-SITE)
    9. Local Area Code on Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    10. HTML NAP Matching Place Page NAP (WEBSITE)
    11. Consistency of Structured Citations (OFF-SITE)
    12. Individually Owner-verified Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    13. Quality/Authority of Unstructured Citations (Newspaper Articles, Blog Posts) (OFF-SITE)
    14. Quality/Authority of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    15. Product / Service Keyword in Business Title (PLACE PAGE)
    16. Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain from Locally-Relevant Domains (OFF-SITE)
    17. Quantity of Unstructured Citations (Newspaper Articles, Blog Posts) (OFF-SITE)
    18. Product/Service Keywords in Reviews (REVIEWS)
    19. Page Authority of Landing Page Specified in Places (WEBSITE)
    20. Quality/Authority of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    21. Product / Service Keyword in Website URL (WEBSITE)
    22. Location Keyword in Business Title (PLACE PAGE)
    23. Quantity of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL from Locally-Relevant Domains (OFF-SITE)
    24. Quantity of Third-Party Traditional Reviews (REVIEWS)
    25. Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    26. Location Keywords in Reviews (REVIEWS)
    27. Diversity of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    28. Geographic Keyword in Website URL (WEBSITE)
    29. NAP in hCard / Schema.org (WEBSITE)
    30. GeoTagged Media Associated with Business (e.g. Panoramio, Flickr, YouTube) (OFF-SITE)
    31. Velocity of Native Google Places Reviews (REVIEWS)
    32. City, State in Most/All Website Title Tags (WEBSITE)
    33. Quantity of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    34. Quantity of Reviews by Authority Reviewers (e.g.Yelp Elite, Multiple Places Reviewers, etc) (REVIEWS)
    35. Product/Service Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    36. Business Title in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    37. Association of Photos with Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    38. Location Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    39. Location Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    40. City, State in Places Landing Page H1/H2 Tags (WEBSITE)
    41. Product / Service Keyword in Place Page Description (PLACE PAGE)
    42. Location Keyword in Place Page Description (PLACE PAGE)
    43. Age of Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    44. Business Title in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    45. Product/Service Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    46. High Numerical Ratings by Authority Reviewers (e.g.Yelp Elite, Multiple Places Reviewers, etc) (REVIEWS)
    47. City, State in Most/All H1/H2 Tags (WEBSITE)
    48. Diversity of Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    49. Overall Velocity of Reviews (Native + Third-Party) (REVIEWS)
    50. Quantity of Third-Party Unstructured Reviews (REVIEWS)
    51. Product / Service Keywords in Place Page Custom Attributes (PLACE PAGE)
    52. Quantity of Native Google Places Ratings (no text) (REVIEWS)
    53. High Numerical Ratings of Place by Google Users (e.g. 4-5) (REVIEWS)
    54. Number of Actions Taken by Searchers on a Place Page (e.g. Driving Directions, Mobile Phone Calls) (PLACE PAGE)
    55. Numerical Percentage of Place Page Completeness (PLACE PAGE)
    56. Marginal Category Associations (PLACE PAGE)
    57. Number of +1’s on Website (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    58. Bulk Owner-verified Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    59. Matching Google Account Domain to Places Landing Page Domain (PLACE PAGE)
    60. Velocity of New Inbound Links to Domain (OFF-SITE)
    61. Number of Adds/Shares on Google+ (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    62. Velocity of Third-Party Reviews (REVIEWS)
    63. Click-Through Rate from Search Results (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    64. Authority of +1’s on Website (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    65. Association of Videos with Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    66. Velocity of New Inbound Links to Places Landing Page URL (OFF-SITE)
    67. KML File on Domain Name (WEBSITE)
    68. Quantity of MyMaps References to Business (OFF-SITE)
    69. High Numerical Third-Party Ratings (e.g. 4-5) (REVIEWS)
    70. Velocity of Adds/Shares on Google+ (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    71. Loadtime of Places Landing Page (WEBSITE)
    72. Popularity (# of Views) of MyMaps References to Business (OFF-SITE)
    73. Authority of Adds/Shares on Google+ (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    74. Positive Sentiment in Reviews (REVIEWS)
    75. Location Keywords in Place Page Custom Attributes (PLACE PAGE)
    76. Matching, Public WHOIS Information (OFF-SITE)
    77. Velocity of +1’s on Website (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    78. Volume of Check-Ins on Popular Services (e.g. Foursquare, Facebook, Twitter) (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    79. Number of Shares/Likes on Facebook (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    80. Number of Followers/Mentions on Twitter (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    81. Authority of Followers/Mentions on Twitter (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    82. High Numerical Rating of hReview/Schema Testimonials (WEBSITE)
    83. Volume of Testimonials in hReview / Schema.org (WEBSITE)
    84. Velocity of Check-Ins on Popular Services (e.g. Foursquare, Facebook, Twitter) (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    85. Volume of HTML Testimonials (WEBSITE)
    86. Velocity of Followers/Mentions on Twitter (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    87. Velocity of Shares/Likes on Facebook (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    88. Inclusion of Offer on Place Page (PLACE PAGE)
    89. Authority of Shares/Likes on Facebook (SOCIAL/MOBILE)
    90. Participation in Adwords Express or Google Offers (OFF-SITE)

    One thing that strikes me, looking at this list, is that “Velocity of Adds/Shares on Google+” is so far down on it. Considering that Google just made Google+ the backbone of local search, it will be interesting to see how this is looked at the next time the survey is taken. In fact, it’s interesting to see social factors in general appearing so far down on the list, given this recent study from Searchmetrics showing such factors’ apparent importance to search in general.

    I suggest taking a look at the whole survey. It goes further than just the 90 things listed above, breaking it down by general signals, Place Page factors, off-site factors, on-site factors, review factors, social/mobile factors, and additional factors suggested, as well as numerous comments from experts.

    Local search, in general, may soon be getting turned on its ear. In addition to Google’s new Google+-based local strategy, Apple is doing some interesting things of its own, while dumping Google from its Maps app, and getting much more integrated with Yelp and making search improvements to Siri.

    Regardless of the ranking of the list above, it does stop and make you think about all the potential factors that could go into your local ranking, and many are certainly worth paying attention to.

    Here’s another recent attempt at listing Google local ranking factors, from a study by Bizible (including former Bing staff).

  • Google Talks Showing Multiple Results From The Same Site

    Google’s head of webspam, Matt Cutts, put out a new Webmaster Help Video, responding to the user submitted question:

    Under which circumstances will Google decide to display multiple results from the same website?

    “The answer has changed over the years,” he says. “But the high level answer is, when we think it’s useful and it doesn’t hurt diversity too much.”

    Cutts talks about a strategy Google used for years, called host crowding, where Google would group results from the same site together, but says people would get around this, and game the system by using different subdomains. He also talks about some other limitations of host crowding.

    Discussing how things are these days, Cutts says, “You want to show as many results as you think is useful, and that’s the tricky bit. What the user is looking for can vary depending on what they’re searching for. For example, if they type in something like HP or IBM, probably a lot of pages or a lot of results from HP is a good answer. So several people have noted that it’s possible to get more than two, more than four, lots of results from Hewlett Packard if you search for HP. But that’s OK. The user has indicated that’s their interest by doing that query.”

    He continues, “But in general, what we try to balance is this trade-off between a good diversity of results, because you don’t know exactly what the user was looking for, so you want to give them a little bit of a sampling to say, ‘OK, here’s a bunch of different possible interpretations. Here’s what you might be looking for.’ And then we also want to absolutely give the results that we think match the query well, and sometimes that can be from multiple pages within the same site.”

    “So there’s always a tension,” says Cutts. “There’s always a trade-off in trying to figure out what is the best set of search results to return. There’s no objectively true or perfect way to do it. We’ve varied our scoring. We’ve varied our user interfaces. And if there’s one thing you can count on, it will be that Google will continue to test out ideas. Google will continue to evolve how often we think it’s appropriate to show how many results from how many sites in the search results.”

    Google, as you may know, makes changes to its algorithm every day. Each month, Google puts out a big list of recent changes. Here are the changes Google made in May. Those are just the actual changes. Google also runs 20,000 search experiments a year.

  • Apple’s Safari Gets Better For Search, Baidu Added

    As you may know, Apple is holding its worldwide developers conference (WWDC), and making a bunch of product announcements. Among the announcements were some new features for its Safari browser.

    From the sound of it, Safari is about to get more Chrome-like, with search functionality from a unified search/URL bar, as well as synced bookmarks and history across various devices.

    Baidu has even been added as a search option.

    There’s a new feature called iCloud Tabs, which shows you all the tabs you have open across your iOS/OS X devices. This way, you can pick up on your Mac where you left off on your iPhone or iPad, for example. With Tab View, you can use gestures to physically navigate across tabs.

    There’s an offline reading list feature, and another feature, Smart App Banners, lets you upload photos to websites.

    The new Safari, Apple says, has the fastest javascript engine of any browser on the planet.

    Here’s what Apple has to say about the new Safari on its iOS 6 page:

    iOS 6 brings even better web browsing to your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. iCloud Tabs keeps track of which pages you have open on your devices, so you can start browsing on one device and pick up right where you left off on whatever device is handy. Safari now saves web pages — not just links — in your Reading List, so you can catch up on your reading even when you can’t connect to the Internet.6 And when you’re posting a photo or video to eBay, Craigslist, or another site, you can take photos and video — or choose from your Camera Roll — without leaving Safari. When you really want to see the whole picture, turn your iPhone or iPod touch to landscape and tap the full-screen icon to view web pages without distractions.

    As far as search goes, Google set a new standard with its Chrome omnibox, and frankly, I’m surprised more browsers haven’t latched onto this kind of functionality. It simply improves the speed of web surfing. One has to wonder how this will affect adoption of Chrome for iOS, if it ever actually comes out.

    How will it affect Yahoo’s push into the mobile browser market with Axis, which seemed geared towards iOS, given Chrome’s absence from the operating system.

  • Google Panda Update: Google Rolls Out Data Refresh

    Google just announced via Twitter that it started rolling out a Panda refresh on Friday. According to the company, less than 1% of queries are noticeably affected in the U.S. Worldwide, 1% are apparently affected.

    Google told us earlier this month that there had not been another Panda update, after some webmasters suspected one, but that has obviously changed now.

    If you’ve been hit by the Panda update, remember, you can recover. Last year, Google put out this list of 23 questions to ask yourself about the quality of your content:

    • Would you trust the information presented in this article?
    • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
    • Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
    • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
    • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
    • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
    • Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
    • Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
    • How much quality control is done on content?
    • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
    • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
    • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
    • Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
    • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
    • Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
    • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
    • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
    • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
    • Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
    • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
    • Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
    • Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
    • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

    Google didn’t say exactly that these are official guidelines, though many of them did reappear in Google’s recently launched Webmaster Academy.

    Were you affected by this update? Let us know in the comments.

    More Panda coverage here.

  • Google Removes Parts Of Penalties If You Make Changes

    Just as you can recover from a Google algorithm update like Penguin, you can bounce back from a penalty as well. In fact, you can even partially bounce back, even if you’re unable to bounce all the way back at once.

    Link buyers, pay attention.

    There’s a discussion in Google’s Webmaster Central forum, discussing Google partially removing penalties, complete with word from a Google representative (hat tip: Barry Schwartz).

    Member T-Harris says his site was hit with a penalty due to inorganic links, that he “removed a great deal of these links, amended anchor text when we had been participating in guest blog posts,” and received a letter from Google’s search quality team saying that after re-evaluating the site’s backlinks, they were able to revoke a manual action.

    Google only considers manual action to be actual penalties, so Penguin victims, don’t get your hopes up, though you can still recover.

    “There are still inorganic links pointing to your site that we have taken action on,” the message said, according to T-Harris. “Once you’ve been able to make further progress in getting these links removed, please reply to this email with the details of your clean-up effort.”

    Google Webmaster Trends analyst, John Mueller (pictured), jumped into the discussion to say:

    That usually means that the team has been able to remove a part of the manual actions being taken due to the changes that you’ve made. It sounds like there still are some issues that you might want to review & resolve though. Generally speaking, it can take a bit of time for these kinds of changes to bubble up, and to be visible in search results, it would be rare to see a jump right afterwards. My recommendation (not knowing the specific case/site) would be to follow the advice of the search quality team and to continue working on removing any unnatural links that your site may have collected over time.

    On that note, Google may soon let webmasters tell it specific links to ignore. Last week, Google said such a tool may become available in the next few months.

    Image: John Mueller’s Google Profile pic

  • Google Algorithm Changes For May: Big List Released

    We’ve all been waiting for it, and now it’s here: Google’s monthly list of algorithm changes for May. This time, it’s 39 changes (less than last month).

    Of particular note, Google says it made a couple of adjustments to Penguin:

    Improvements to Penguin. [launch codename “twref2”, project codename “Page Quality”] This month we rolled out a couple minor tweaks to improve signals and refresh the data used by the penguin algorithm.

    Also noteworthy:

    Better application of inorganic backlinks signals. [launch codename “improv-fix”, project codename “Page Quality”] We have algorithms in place designed to detect a variety of link schemes, a common spam technique. This change ensures we’re using those signals appropriately in the rest of our ranking. 

    Of course, Google also made more adjustments to freshness.

    We’ll be digging into these much more, but for now, here’s the list in its entirety:

    • Deeper detection of hacked pages. [launch codename “GPGB”, project codename “Page Quality”] For some time now Google has been detecting defaced content on hacked pages and presenting a notice on search results reading, “This site may be compromised.” In the past, this algorithm has focused exclusively on homepages, but now we’ve noticed hacking incidents are growing more common on deeper pages on particular sites, so we’re expanding to these deeper pages.
    • Autocomplete predictions used as refinements. [launch codename “Alaska”, project codename “Refinements”] When a user types a search she’ll see a number of predictions beneath the search box. After she hits “Enter”, the results page may also include related searches or “refinements”. With this change, we’re beginning to include some especially useful predictions as “Related searches” on the results page.
    • More predictions for Japanese users. [project codename “Autocomplete”] Our usability testing suggests that Japanese users prefer more autocomplete predictions than users in other locales. Because of this, we’ve expanded the number or predictions shown in Japan to as many as eight (when Instant is on).
    • Improvements to autocomplete on Mobile. [launch codename “Lookahead”, project codename “Mobile”] We made an improvement to make predictions work faster on mobile networks through more aggressive caching.
    • Fewer arbitrary predictions. [launch codename “Axis5”, project codename “Autocomplete”] This launch makes it less likely you’ll see low-quality predictions in autocomplete.
    • Improved IME in autocomplete. [launch codename “ime9”, project codename “Translation and Internationalization”] This change improves handling of input method editors (IMEs) in autocomplete, including support for caps lock and better handling of inputs based on user language.
    • New segmenters for Asian languages. [launch codename “BeautifulMind”] Speech segmentation is about finding the boundaries between words or parts of words. We updated the segmenters for three asian languages: Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, to better understand the meaning of text in these languages. We’ll continue to update and improve our algorithm for segmentation.
    • Scoring and infrastructure improvements for Google Books pages in Universal Search.[launch codename “Utgo”, project codename “Indexing”] This launch transitions the billions of pages of scanned books to a unified serving and scoring infrastructure with web search. This is an efficiency, comprehensiveness and quality change that provides significant savings in CPU usage while improving the quality of search results.
    • Unified Soccer feature. [project codename “Answers”] This change unifies the soccer search feature experience across leagues in Spain, England, Germany and Italy, providing scores and scheduling information right on the search result page.
    • Improvements to NBA search feature. [project codename “Answers”] This launch makes it so we’ll more often return relevant NBA scores and information right at the top of your search results. Try searching for [nba playoffs] or [heat games].
    • New Golf search feature. [project codename “Answers”] This change introduces a new search feature for the Professional Golf Association (PGA) and PGA Tour, including information about tour matches and golfers. Try searching for [tiger woods] or [2012 pga schedule].
    • Improvements to ranking for news results. [project codename “News”] This change improves signals we use to rank news content in our main search results. In particular, this change helps you discover news content more quickly than before.
    • Better application of inorganic backlinks signals. [launch codename “improv-fix”, project codename “Page Quality”] We have algorithms in place designed to detect a variety of link schemes, a common spam technique. This change ensures we’re using those signals appropriately in the rest of our ranking.
    • Improvements to Penguin. [launch codename “twref2”, project codename “Page Quality”] This month we rolled out a couple minor tweaks to improve signals and refresh the data used by the penguin algorithm.
    • Trigger alt title when HTML title is truncated. [launch codename “tomwaits”, project codename “Snippets”] We have algorithms designed to present the best possible result titles. This change will show a more succinct title for results where the current title is so long that it gets truncated. We’ll only do this when the new, shorter title is just as accurate as the old one.
    • Efficiency improvements in alternative title generation. [launch codename “TopOfTheRock”, project codename “Snippets”] With this change we’ve improved the efficiency of title generation systems, leading to significant savings in cpu usage and a more focused set of titles actually shown in search results.
    • Better demotion of boilerplate anchors in alternate title generation. [launch codename “otisredding”, project codename “Snippets”] When presenting titles in search results, we want to avoid boilerplate copy that doesn’t describe the page accurately, such as “Go Back.” This change helps improve titles by avoiding these less useful bits of text.
    • Internationalizing music rich snippets. [launch codename “the kids are disco dancing”, project codename “Snippets”] Music rich snippets enable webmasters to mark up their pages so users can more easily discover pages in the search results where you can listen to or preview songs. The feature launched originally on google.com, but this month we enabled music rich snippets for the rest of the world.
    • Music rich snippets on mobile. [project codename “Snippets”] With this change we’ve turned on music rich snippets for mobile devices, making it easier for users to find songs and albums when they’re on the go.
    • Improvement to SafeSearch goes international. [launch codename “GentleWorld”, project codename “SafeSearch”] This change internationalizes an algorithm designed to handle results on the borderline between adult and general content.
    • Simplification of term-scoring algorithms. [launch codename “ROLL”, project codename “Query Understanding”] This change simplifies some of our code at a minimal cost in quality. This is part of a larger effort to improve code readability.
    • Fading results to white for Google Instant. [project codename “Google Instant”] We made a minor user experience improvement to Google Instant. With this change, we introduced a subtle fade animation when going from a page with results to a page without.
    • Better detection of major new events. [project codename “Freshness”] This change helps ensure that Google can return fresh web results in realtime seconds after a major event occurs.
    • Smoother ranking functions for freshness. [launch codename “flsp”, project codename “Freshness”] This change replaces a number of thresholds used for identifying fresh documents with more continuous functions.
    • Better detection of searches looking for fresh content. [launch codename “Pineapples”, project codename “Freshness”] This change introduces a brand new classifier to help detect searches that are likely looking for fresh content.
    • Freshness algorithm simplifications. [launch codename “febofu”, project codename “Freshness”] This month we rolled out a simplification to our freshness algorithms, which will make it easier to understand bugs and tune signals.
    • Updates to +Pages in right-hand panel. [project codename “Social Search”] We improved our signals for identifying relevant +Pages to show in the right-hand panel.
    • Performance optimizations in our ranking algorithm. [launch codename “DropSmallCFeature”] This launch significantly improves the efficiency of our scoring infrastructure with minimal impact on the quality of our results.
    • Simpler logic for serving results from diverse domains. [launch codename “hc1”, project codename “Other Ranking Components”] We have algorithms to help return a diverse set of domains when relevant to the user query. This change simplifies the logic behind those algorithms.
    • Precise location option on tablet. [project codename “Mobile”] For a while you’ve had the option to choose to get personalized search results relevant to your more precise location on mobile. This month we expanded that choice to tablet. You’ll see the link at the bottom of the homepage and a button above local search results.
    • Improvements to local search on tablet. [project codename “Mobile”] Similar to thechanges we released on mobile this month, we also improved local search on tablet as well. Now you can more easily expand a local result to see more details about the place. After tapping the reviews link in local results, you’ll find details such as a map, reviews, menu links, reservation links, open hours and more.
    • Internationalization of “recent” search feature on mobile. [project codename “Mobile”] This month we expanded the “recent” search feature on mobile to new languages and regions.
  • Google Improves Google+ Search Signals

    Google Improves Google+ Search Signals

    Google revealed a list of 39 changes it made in May, and one of them is about improving social search – particularly when Google chooses to show Google+ pages in the right-hand panel, often reserved for Knowledge Graph results.

    Google’s listing for the change says:

    Updates to +Pages in right-hand panel. [project codename “Social Search”] We improved our signals for identifying relevant +Pages to show in the right-hand panel.

    Pretty vague. It does show, however, that Google is still trying to figure out the best way to use its social network in search. Before the Knowledge Graph, there was a much greater emphasis on Google+ in this area of search results pages, but Google is really high on the Knowledge Graph results, and considers it to be one of the most significant things it has done for search in recent memory. Google also says Knowledge Graph has increased user searches.

    When Google revealed Search Plus Your World earlier this year, it put a lot more Google+ content into users’ search results, by default (although a good amount of this could be eliminated with the toggle button Google provides on the search results pages). Since then, Google seems to have toned the Google+ down a bit.

    At SMX Advanced this week, Google’s Matts reportedly acknowledged that the +1 is “not necessarily the best quality signal right now.”

    “It’s still early days on how valuable the Google+ data will be,” he’s quoted as saying.

    That’s not to say there isn’t a great deal of value for webmasters to be using Google+. In another session at the event, Google+ was found to be a strong signal. A new study from Searchmetrics suggests that the quantity of +1’s has the stongest correlation with good Google rankings (compared to Facebook shares and Tweets), but Google+ doesn’t have enough users for them to be as significant.

  • Google Calls Upon Tom Waits And Otis Redding To Help With Your Site’s Titles

    I’ve been digging through Google’s new list of algorithm changes it made during the month of May, and I couldn’t help but notice that Google launched a change with the codename “tomwaits”. It’s always interesting to see how Google names its updates. Some of the names go on to become legends (Panda and Penguin, for example). Others you just never hear about it.

    It just seems worth pointing out that someone at Google cares enough about musician Tom Waits to name an algorithm change after it (at least internally). That’s assuming it isn’t named after some Google engineer who also happens to be named Tom Waits.

    So what is the “tomwaits” update? Here’s the listing:

    Trigger alt title when HTML title is truncated. [launch codename “tomwaits”, project codename “Snippets”] We have algorithms designed to present the best possible result titles. This change will show a more succinct title for results where the current title is so long that it gets truncated. We’ll only do this when the new, shorter title is just as accurate as the old one.

    Have you seen this update in action with your own site? How good is Google at determining the accuracy?

    Tom Waits isn’t the only musician to inspire such codenames. There’s another one on the list under the codename: otisredding. This one, interestingly enough, also has to do with alt titles:

    Better demotion of boilerplate anchors in alternate title generation. [launch codename “otisredding”, project codename “Snippets”] When presenting titles in search results, we want to avoid boilerplate copy that doesn’t describe the page accurately, such as “Go Back.” This change helps improve titles by avoiding these less useful bits of text.

    Some other interesting codenames Google has for its changes in May:

    • Lookahead
    • BeautifulMind
    • TopOfTheRock
    • the kids are disco dancing
    • GentleWorld

    They almost sound like race horses, don’t they?

    Image: TomWaits.com

  • Google Gets Better As A Sports Search Engine

    Google put out a big list of algorithm changes it made in May, and several of them are related to people searching sports-related queries. Specifically, the changes are related to Soccer, Basketball and Golf.

    The relevant changes:

    • Unified Soccer feature. [project codename “Answers”] This change unifies the soccer search feature experience across leagues in Spain, England, Germany and Italy, providing scores and scheduling information right on the search result page.
    • Improvements to NBA search feature. [project codename “Answers”] This launch makes it so we’ll more often return relevant NBA scores and information right at the top of your search results. Try searching for [nba playoffs] or [heat games].
    • New Golf search feature. [project codename “Answers”] This change introduces a new search feature for the Professional Golf Association (PGA) and PGA Tour, including information about tour matches and golfers. Try searching for [tiger woods] or [2012 pga schedule].

    Here’s a look at the “tiger woods” results:

    Tiger Woods search results

    Here’s “nba playoffs”:

    NBA Playoffs

    Google has made other sports-related improvements in recent months. In April, Google made the following changes:

    • MLB search feature. [launch codename “BallFour”, project codename “Live Results”] As the MLB season began, we rolled out a new MLB search feature. Try searching for [sf giants score] or [mlb scores].
    • Spanish football (La Liga) search feature. This feature provides scores and information about teams playing in La Liga. Try searching for [barcelona fc] or [la liga].
    • Formula 1 racing search feature. [launch codename “CheckeredFlag”] This month we introduced a new search feature to help you find Formula 1 leaderboards and results. Try searching [formula 1] or [mark webber].
    • Tweaks to NHL search feature. We’ve improved the NHL search feature so it’s more likely to appear when relevant. Try searching for [nhl scores] or [capitals score].

    In March, Google made these changes:

    • Live results for UEFA Champions League and KHL. We’ve added live-updating snippets in our search results for the KHL (Russian Hockey League) and UEFA Champions League, including scores and schedules. Now you can find live results from a variety of sports leagues, including the NFLNBANHL and others.
    • Tennis search feature. [launch codename “DoubleFault”] We’ve introduced a new search feature to provide realtime tennis scores at the top of the search results page. Try [maria sharapova] or [sony ericsson open].

    Have you found Google to be more useful for finding sports information in recent months?

  • Google Book Scans Get Unified With Web Search

    Google released its big list of 39 changes it made in May. One particularly interesting change deals with how Google handles results from the books it scans. The change says:

    Scoring and infrastructure improvements for Google Books pages in Universal Search.[launch codename “Utgo”, project codename “Indexing”] This launch transitions the billions of pages of scanned books to a unified serving and scoring infrastructure with web search. This is an efficiency, comprehensiveness and quality change that provides significant savings in CPU usage while improving the quality of search results.

    Unifying Google books scans with web search, should only add to Google’s enormous datapool, recently enhanced by the Knowledge Graph. Printed books are obviously important to Google’s stated mission of organizing the world’s information and making it universally accessible.

    Now, if Google could just get that Twitter firehose back, and some personal Facebook data…

    Google does continue to focus a great deal on freshness.

    As far as book scans go, Google faces other obstacles there. Last week, news came out that a judge had granted authors and photographers the ability to sue Google over it.

  • Google Autocomplete Is… (Improved)

    Google Autocomplete Is… (Improved)

    Google put out its big list of algorithm changes for May, and 5 out of 39 of them are related to autocomplete predictions. From the sound of it, they’re the predictions are getting more useful, and there’s a lesser chance that you’ll see low-quality predictions. We’ll see.

    Here are the relevant changes:

    • Autocomplete predictions used as refinements. [launch codename “Alaska”, project codename “Refinements”] When a user types a search she’ll see a number of predictions beneath the search box. After she hits “Enter”, the results page may also include related searches or “refinements”. With this change, we’re beginning to include some especially useful predictions as “Related searches” on the results page.
    • More predictions for Japanese users. [project codename “Autocomplete”] Our usability testing suggests that Japanese users prefer more autocomplete predictions than users in other locales. Because of this, we’ve expanded the number or predictions shown in Japan to as many as eight (when Instant is on).
    • Improvements to autocomplete on Mobile. [launch codename “Lookahead”, project codename “Mobile”] We made an improvement to make predictions work faster on mobile networks through more aggressive caching.
    • Fewer arbitrary predictions. [launch codename “Axis5”, project codename “Autocomplete”] This launch makes it less likely you’ll see low-quality predictions in autocomplete.
    • Improved IME in autocomplete. [launch codename “ime9”, project codename “Translation and Internationalization”] This change improves handling of input method editors (IMEs) in autocomplete, including support for caps lock and better handling of inputs based on user language.

    At times, Google’s autocomplete feature has gotten the company some unwanted attention. A few months back, for example, a Japanese court ordered Google to delete specific terms from Autocomplete. It’s interesting that they’re now offering more predictions for Japanese users.

    At the time, a Google spokesperson told us, “Autocomplete is a feature of Google search that offers predicted searches to help you more quickly find what you’re looking for. These searches are produced by a number of factors including the popularity of search terms. Google does not determine these terms manually–all of the queries shown in Autocomplete have been typed previously by other Google users.”

    Since then, we’ve seen the company sued over “Jewish” autocomplete suggestions.

    According to Google’s new and improved Autocomplete, Google Autocomplete is funny (as you can see from the image above).

    For some fun with the feature, check out: The 2012 Presidential Election, As Told By Google Autocomplete.

  • Google Algorithm Gets More Freshness Tweaks

    Google finally released its big list of algorithm changes for the month of May. As it has in other recent months, Google made more adjustments to freshness signals.

    Here are the relevant changes from the list:

    • Better detection of major new events. [project codename “Freshness”] This change helps ensure that Google can return fresh web results in realtime seconds after a major event occurs.
    • Smoother ranking functions for freshness. [launch codename “flsp”, project codename “Freshness”] This change replaces a number of thresholds used for identifying fresh documents with more continuous functions.
    • Better detection of searches looking for fresh content. [launch codename “Pineapples”, project codename “Freshness”] This change introduces a brand new classifier to help detect searches that are likely looking for fresh content.
    • Freshness algorithm simplifications. [launch codename “febofu”, project codename “Freshness”] This month we rolled out a simplification to our freshness algorithms, which will make it easier to understand bugs and tune signals.

    Google also announced a change for May listed as “improvements to ranking for news results”. That’s somewhat related to freshness. “This change improves signals we use to rank news content in our main search results,” says Google. “In particular, this change helps you discover news content more quickly than before.”

    For comparison, here are the freshness tweaks they announced a month ago.

    Do you think Google’s results are getting better in the freshness department. In the past, we’ve talked about how freshness has sometimes hurt relevancy.

  • Google Integrates AdMob With AdWords, Previews New Interface

    Google announced today that it is integrating AdMob into AdWords, enabling its over a million AdWords advertisers to run campaigns across over 300,000 mobile apps running AdMob ads on over 350 million mobile devices. Of course, it can all be managed from the AdWords interface.

    There’s a new campaign type in AdWords called Display Network only (mobile apps):

    Display Network (mobile)

    Advertisers can launch mobile app campaigns from AdWords, and target specific devices or specific manufacturer brands, in addition to the already available targeting by operator, wifi or OS version. Another targeting option is by individual app. Google says it will soon provide an estimate on the number of devices reached and impressions targeted.

    “It also helps AdMob developers and publishers increase their revenue by giving them access to a large number of new advertisers,” says Jonathan Alferness, Director of Product Management, Mobile Ads. “AdWords advertisers can now manage, measure and adjust search, display and video ads, reaching people on more than 2 million websites and hundreds of thousands of apps, across all screens.”

    Google says the move complements DoubleClick Digital Marketing, which it announced earlier this week.

    “As mobile usage continues to explode, businesses increasingly need to adapt their marketing strategies to mobile platforms and mobile-specific consumer trends,” says Alferness.

    As far as developers are concerned, Google Mobile Ads product manager Vishay Nihalani says, “All filters you currently use for AdMob ads will be respected for AdWords ads as well. However, please be aware that your filters will still not apply to Google Certified Ad Networks. You will be able to opt out of showing ads from Google Certified Ad Networks if you require filters across all your inventory.”

    AdMob’s network reaches 23 countries, each generating over one billion ad-requests last month, according to Google. That’s up from 11 countries in April 2011.

    Meanwhile, Google has also been working on a redesign of the AdWords interface, and this is now available for preview.

    We’re giving the AdWords interface a visual refresh, and want your feedback on the redesign. Check out the preview: http://t.co/rIeutD7z
    1 hour ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    “This refresh aims to get the interface out of the way, so that the important things – such as your data – stand out,” says Greg Rosenberg on the Inside AdWords blog. “We integrated the latest client side technologies to make the AdWords interface more visually appealing and scalable.”

    Here are some screenshots:

    New AdWords

    New AdWords

    AdWords

  • Google’s Matt Cutts Jokes About Bing At SMX Advanced

    Remember the good ol’ days when Google was accusing Bing of stealing their results, and Bing was accusing Google of click fraud, and whenever representatives from the two search giants were in a room together things got awkward? Well, it’s been all about good-natured ribbing between competitors lately.

    This tends to occur at various conferences when search is discussed, and of course it’s no surprise that it would occur at a search-specific conference like SMX Advanced.

    Google’s Matt Cutts spoke with Danny Sullivan in a keynote discussion at the event. Cutts famously does these 30 day challenges, in which he will commit 30 days of his time to doing specific things. Sullivan asked Cutts if he’d do something like “I’m gonna use Bing for 30 days.”

    His response to this, according to a live blog from SMX sister site Search Engine Land, was:

    I have not done that one, and I’m afraid to try! (huge laughter from audience – Matt then says he’s joking and compliments Bing team)

    Another liveblogged account from Search Engine Roundtable says:

    Danny: 30 day challenges are your thing, like I am going to use Bing for 30 days or so. Matt said, I try to do good habits (joking)

     

    @jetsettingjulie it’s a fine line between playful fun and snarkiness–hope I didn’t cross over that line too much.
    10 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    It’s all good though. Cutts and Bing’s Duane Forrester are tight:

     

     
  • Google Has New Advice For Mobile SEO

    Google has been pushing its “GoMo” campaign for a while, trying to get sites set up for mobile success, but today, Google posted specific recommendations for smartphone-optimized sites on its Webmaster Central blog.

    Google says it supports the following configurations for sites targeting smartphones:

    1. Sites that use responsive web design, i.e. sites that serve all devices on the same set of URLs, with each URL serving the same HTML to all devices and using just CSS to change how the page is rendered on the device. This is Google’s recommended configuration.

    2. Sites that dynamically serve all devices on the same set of URLs, but each URL serves different HTML (and CSS) depending on whether the user agent is a desktop or a mobile device.

    3. Sites that have a separate mobile and desktop sites.

    Google Webmaster Trends analyst Pierre Far also lists two advantages of utilizing responsive web design:

    1. It keeps your desktop and mobile content on a single URL, which is easier for your users to interact with, share, and link to and for Google’s algorithms to assign the indexing properties to your content.

    2. Google can discover your content more efficiently as we wouldn’t need to crawl a page with the different Googlebot user agents to retrieve and index all the content.

    Google “strongly” recommends using the Vary HTTP header to let its algorithms know that the content might change for different user agents. Google says it uses this as a crawling signal for Googlebot-Mobile.

    The company also notes in a help center article, “Don’t block Googlebot from crawling any page assets (CSS, javascript, and images) using robots.txt or otherwise. Being able to access these external files fully will help our algorithms detect your site’s responsive web design configuration and treat it appropriately.”

    Google has specific annotations for desktop and mobile URLs that it says will help its algorithms understand your site. There is a whole section about this in Google’s Building Smartphone-Optimized Sites recommendation page.

    A recent study from Adobe found that website visits from tablets grew about 10 times faster than the rate of smartphones within two years of market introduction, and by over 300% in the last year. Part of the reason for this, according to the company, is that the majority of sites are not optimized for mobile, and this is reflected when users view them on smartphones. Tablets tend to handle the sites better, to where the optimization isn’t as much of a factor.

    “Tablets are better for surfing than smartphones,” Adobe Digital Index Director, Austin Bankhead, told WebProNews at the time.

    Perhaps if enough sites take Google’s advice, smartphone web surfing in general will be better for everyone.