WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • Bing Image Search Gets Pinterest Boards

    Bing Image Search Gets Pinterest Boards

    Bing announced today that it has added new Pinterest integration to its Image Search. When users search for an image on Bing, they may see related boards from Pinterest on the right-hand side of the search results page.

    “Every day Bing receives millions of searches from across the Web, and nearly 10 percent of those searches are for images,” a spokesperson for Bing tells WebProNews. “With hundreds of thousands of images to choose from, finding the perfect image can be challenging. That’s why starting today, Bing will bring together curated collections of images from across the Web in new Image collections on Bing image search.”

    Bing Pinterest integration

    Bing on Pinterest

    Bing says this is “only the beginning” of its exploration of ways to showcase social communities within Bing Image Search.

    Earlier this year, Bing added Pinterest pinning functionality to Image Search, enabling users to pin the images they find on Bing to their boards back on Pinterest.

    Pinterest itself recently added more info to article pins, potentially helping drive more web traffic to articles and blog posts. Perhaps some of this Bing image traffic will flow that way as well.

    Images: Bing

  • Check Out Google’s New Song Exploration Feature

    Last week, Google made a handful of search-related announcements. In a blog post, it talked about improvements to Knowledge Graph, reminders in iOS and a new mobile design.

    At a press event, Google revealed that it had launched a new algorithm called Hummingbird. That is what has gotten the bulk of attention, but Google also mentioned a new song exploration feature. Here’s what that does.

    If you type in an artist or band’s name, followed by the word “songs,” you’ll get a much richer search results page than you would have in the past. Google has introduced a carousel feature at the top of the page, enabling the user to quickly browse through a song-list.

    Converge Songs

    If you click on the song, you’ll get a page that looks something like this, which in many cases, will include a YouTube video prominently on the page, where you can listen:

    Converge: Dark Horse

    This is interesting, considering often times, these songs as they’re available on YouTube, won’t necessarily be from official channels, but from questionable sources. This could raise some copyright flags with labels.

    Either way, the feature shows Google getting smarter at structuring data in a useable way.

    It’s unclear how Google is determining which songs to display in the list, however. The list, at least in this example, is far from complete.

    [h/t: Search Engine Roundtable]

    Image: Google

  • Here’s What Bing’s Doing On iOS Now

    Here’s What Bing’s Doing On iOS Now

    Bing announced the launch of some new features for the iPhone and iPod Touch today, building on recent updates to its Windows Phone, Android and iOS experiences.

    There are four new tiles for the homepage, which will show trending news, images from Bing trends, maps (for local businesses) and weather.

    Bing on iOS

    There’s also a new share button with an updated design, which allows users to share images via Facebook and Twitter, as well as save a screenshot of the full search results page, homepage image or image from Bing Image Search.

    Bing ioS share

    A new menu lets users browse saved images, screenshots and bookmarks and sign in with a Microsoft account to sync them to Skydrive or the iPad app.

    “Click ‘More Microsoft apps’ to explore additional options in the iOS store including Office Mobile, Skydrive, OneNote and more,” Bing says.

    Bing ioS menu

    iOS Bing

    And don’t forget that Bing is now integrated into Siri. Apple revealed the addition of Bing results (and Wikipedia results) with iOS 7 earlier this year. Apple’s operating system update was just released this week, and is now available (if you can actually download it).

  • Foursquare Now Lets You Search by Specific Foods in Your Area

    Foursquare has just made another small step in their push to challenge Yelp, Google Places, and other local search and discovery apps. Starting today, Foursquare users can now search for specific food items and the app will pull up the various locations in the area where they can be found.

    “Just type what you’re looking for into Foursquare and we’ll show you all the restaurants nearby that serve that dish, with info straight from their menus (and our 32 million tips). It’s this sort of data that powers our new magical proactive recommendations, and which only Foursquare can do,” says Foursquare.

    Not only can you search specific food items like “brisket” or “bulgogi,” but you can also search basic dietary restrictions like “gluten free.”

    Foursquare’s new food search springs out of a recent partnership with Locu, and web menu platform. This allowed Foursquare to expand its database of menus – one that now contains over 43 million food items (according to the company).

    It may not seem like a huge update, but it’s a really interesting way for Foursquare to leverage its data. Sometimes, you just have a hankering for a specific food, and Foursquare is now offering a quick way for you to find every restaurant in the vicinity that features that specific dish.

    This new feature doesn’t require an app update, as long as you have the most-recent version that launched on August 26th for Android and August 27th for iOS.

    Last week, Foursquare announced that they had hit 40 million users – as well as 40,000 “superusers” who help better the location database with their editing privileges.

    Image via Foursquare

  • Is Google Acknowledging Getting A Link Wrong?

    Last week, we looked at a webmaster’s claim that Google was calling one of his natural, legitimate links unnatural, and now Google may have realized it that it made a mistake.

    The webmaster had said he received a warning earlier in the year, which he deemed “understandable,” as he had worked with SEO agencies in the past that did advertorials, and was spammed with “really bad links” by other sites. He said he spent months contacting webmasters, getting links removed and nofollowed, and had about 500 links disavowed. Essentially, according to him, the site in question should have been in good shape, but when Google responded to his reconsideration request, it gave an example link that appeared to not be violating any guidelines.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable, who originally pointed out the forum post in which the webmaster shared his story, now points to a comment made by a Googler in that same thread. Google’s Eric Kuan had this to say about the situation:

    Thanks for your feedback on the example links sent to you in your reconsideration request. We’ll use your comments to improve the messaging and example links that we send.

    If you believe that your site no longer violates Google Webmaster Guidelines, you can file a new reconsideration request, and we’ll re-evaluate your site for reconsideration.

    It’s not exactly admitting the mistake, but as Schwartz notes, it’s interesting that they would even respond in this scenario otherwise. They’re using the comments to improve messaging. Does that mean they realize there is merit to what this guy is saying, and will use that to keep from making similar mistakes in the future? That’s what it sounds like.

    Google seems to be all about some feedback. The company even surprised webmasters last week with a form asking about “small sites” that should rank better in Google’s results.

  • New Google Now Knowledge Graph Reminders For Music And TV Shows Are Pretty Awesome

    As we reported last week, Google launched an update to its Google Search app for Android, adding some new Google Now functionality. Among the improvements were the ability to set reminders when you search.

    Now that we’re seeing this in action, it’s really cool. You can set reminders while you’re searching from the desktop as well. Search for a band or a TV show, for example, and you can set reminders for album releases or new episodes.

    Google Now - Neko Case

    Google Knowledge Graph Reminders

    Unfortunately, it doesn’t appear to work with sports teams, despite Google’s various rich results for them. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it come in the near future though.

    This is a great example of how Google Now truly is going to change how we interact with Google search, and will only make the things Google pushes to us more useful.

    The feature is also smart enough to know when there will no longer be anything to remind users about. Shows that are no longer on the air, for example, do not have the “remind me” button.

    Hat tip to Google Operating System

    Images: Google

  • Yahoo Buys IQ Engines To Improve Flickr

    Yahoo Buys IQ Engines To Improve Flickr

    Yes, Yahoo is still acquiring companies. This time it’s IQ Engines, an image search company, as first reported by AFP.

    IQ Engines does indeed have a message about the acquisition posted on its homepage:

    We are thrilled to announce that IQ Engines is joining the Flickr team at Yahoo!. As longtime Flickr fans and fellow photography enthusiasts, we look forward to working on improving photo organization and search for the community.

    At IQ Engines, our dream has been to transform the way people search and browse their photos by helping to process them intelligently. We are excited to take things to a global level with one of the most widely used photo services in the world.

    The company will no longer be registering new users. Existing customers will have 30 days to use its API.

    Yahoo also recently acquired Ghostbird Software to enhance its Flickr offering. More on that here. Yahoo has since added new Flickr integration into Yahoo Mail.

    Terms of the acquisition were not disclosed.

    Image: Flickr

  • Will Google’s Expanding Personalization Help Or Hurt Businesses?

    Google has been getting more personalized little by little for years now, but it’s happening much more rapidly these days, and not only is it getting more personalized, it’s getting more conversational, in the sense that it’s just telling you what you want to know (or at least trying to) without having to point you to third-party sites quite so much.

    This presents both pros and cons for businesses, but which there are more of is debatable. What do you think? Is the direction Google is moving in better or worse for businesses? Let us know what you think in the comments.

    Google is adding some new Google Now-like functionality to Google Search. Users will be able to ask Google for specific, personal information, and the search engine will retrieve it from across the various services the user uses, like Gmail, Google Calendar and Google+.

    “Ever had trouble checking your flight’s status on the go because it meant digging through your email for the flight number?” asks product manager Roy Livne. “Or wanted to just quickly see whether your package would arrive on time, without having to look up the tracking info first? You’ve told us it would be much easier if you could skip the fuss and just ask Google.”

    Users will be able to ask Google for information on flights, reservations, purchases, plans and photos, and get them right from the search interface. You can ask Google if your flight as time, or say “my reservations” or my hotel” to get info on your plans, including hotel/restaurant names and addresses.

    “With one tap, you can get driving or public transit directions straight there, saving you lots of steps,” Livne notes.

    You can say, “my purchases” and see the status of current orders, or ask “What are my plans for tomorrow?” to see upcoming flights, hotels, restaurant reservations, events, etc.

    You can also say something like “show me my photos from Thailand” to see photos from your Google+ account, which will be all the more useful if you’ve enabled instant upload. It will even recognize something like “my photos of sunsets”.

    Google actually added this kind of personalized photo search back in May.

    The new stuff will be rolling out to all U.S. users in English on the desktop, tablet and smartphones, with Voice Search.

    This all expands on the conversational search features Google launched a few months ago, but it’s also a just part of an ongoing trend we’ve seen with Google over the last couple years.

    The search engine (originally designed to surface content from across the web) is continually becoming more of a personal assistant. Google has been personalizing results to some extent for years, but the company really started pushing personalization with “Search Plus Your World” launched early last year. As we recently reported, by the way, Google is no longer labeling the personalized results the way it used to.

    Other personalization efforts have come in the forms of the field trial that let users opt in to include content from Gmail, Calendar, and Drive in their search results, and Google Now, which utilizes your personal information from across Google services and presents it to your when it thinks it might be of use.

    Again, more personal assistant than search engine.

    But Google Now, when it came out, was somewhat separate from search. Google appears to be doing everything it can these days to keep you in the Google universe, rather than truly searching the web. Searching the web (organic search) is almost a secondary thing at this point. Just an added service that Google provides when it doesn’t really know what you’re looking for.

    The good news about all of this personalization and “quick answers” from the business perspective is that businesses have new avenues to get in front of users in Google search that basically sidestep past SEO strategies. With Google integrating Gmail into search, for example, businesses may be able to get emailed information in front of users when they’re simply searching. There’s no reason not to assume that Google won’t continue to expand on these features.

    It’s already getting harder to get in front of Gmail users thanks to Google’s recent Gmail redesign, and additional integration into search could be a blessing in disguise. Search ads have always been attractive to businesses because they get messages in front of users right when they’re searching for that particular need. Increased Gmail integration into Google search could provide a similar effect for email marketing messages. Of course, this really comes down to Google’s implementation.

    Activity on Google+ is also more likely to find its way into search. You get the idea.

    The point is that the more Google integrates its various services into search, the more businesses will be able to get out of these services. Rather than trying to outrank competitors with SEO tactics, businesses could end up better off by simply being better at working the greater Google universe. As Google continues to integrate its various offerings in different ways, businesses should also look to integrate these offerings into their strategies.

    Google just launched some new business features (and an API) for Google+ this week, for example. This might be a good place to start looking at possibilities.

    And don’t forget that authorship, which may already be playing a significant role in Google rankings these days, is directly tied to Google+.

    Do you see Google’s increased focus on personalization and direct answer-providing as a positive evolution for businesses or is it just going to make things harder? Tell us what you think.

  • Here’s The Matt Cutts Video We’ve All Been Waiting For

    Okay, maybe you weren’t waiting for it, but if you’ve watched a lot of Matt Cutts videos (which I assume you have if your’e reading this), it’s kind of funny.

    The video comes from OnlineMarketing.de, and it’s called, “It’s a party in here!” I’m not sure if it tops the classic Cutts video parody in which he discusses “How to rank #1 in Google,” but still.

    For more Matt Cutts-related humor, check out his halloween costumes and his extended dinosaur video.

    [via Search Engine Roundtable]

  • Maria Mitchell Google Doodle Honors First Female Professional Astronomer

    Today, Google is honoring Maria Mitchell with a really cool Doodle that shows the first American professional female astronomer using a telescope to look to the sky – presumably in hunt for “Miss Mitchell’s Comet,” which she would discover in 1847.

    Mitchell was born in 1818 in Nantucket, Massachusetts and raised in the Quaker faith. She most likely benefitted from the Quaker’s belief in intellectual equality – getting the same type of education that her brothers received. Mitchell started pursuing astronomy at an early age. By age 12, Mitchell had already helped her father to calculate an annular eclipse. In 1836, Mitchell took a job as the first librarian of the Nantucket Atheneum, and she ended up working there for 18 years.

    And in 1847, she made a big discovery. Using a telescope, she spotted a coment that would later be named “Miss Mitchell’s Comet.” For this discovery, she was awarded a gold medal by the King of Denmark.

    The Maria Mitchell Association describes the rest of her life, which focused on being an educator:

    After achieving her fame, Maria was widely sought after and went on to achieve many great things. She resigned her post at the Atheneum in 1856 to travel throughout the US and Europe. In 1865, she became Professor of Astronomy at the newly-founded Vassar College.

    Maria was an inspiration to her students. It was Vassar College that Maria felt was truly her home. She believed in learning by doing, and in the capacity of women to achieve what their male counterparts could. “Miss Mitchell” was beloved by her students whom she taught until her retirement in 1888, due to failing health. She died in 1889, and was buried next to her parents in Nantucket’s Prospect Hill Cemetery.

    Today’s Google Doodle celebrates what would be her 195th birthday.

  • Yandex Co-Founder Ilya Segalovich Dies at 48 [UPDATED]

    UPDATE: Yandex CEO Arkady Volozh has clarified an announcement made by his company earlier today that Segalovich had died. According to him, he is actually in a coma:

    “We want to clarify an earlier statement that the company put out. We have since learnt that Ilya is in coma and on life support although not showing any brain function. Our thoughts are with him at this time,” says Volozh.

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Yandex, Russia’s largest search engine and one of the largest internet companies in the region, has just announced the death of Ilya Segalovich – the company’s co-founder. Segalovich had also served at CTO of the company since 2000.

    “Ilya was a friend of life and this is a terrible personal loss. Ilya’s contributions to the founding and development of Yandex were invaluable. More importantly, his philanthropic contributions touched many children in need. My thoughts and those of all of the Yandex family are with Ilya’s family at this difficult time. We know that the strong technical team Ilya helped to build will carry on the work Ilya cared so passionately about. Ilya was an encyclopedia in technology and his highest ethical standards has always set the landmark for us all,” said CEO Arkady Volozh in a statement.

    Segalovich had been diagnosed with cancer, but according to Yandex, it was treatable and he was responding well to treatment. That’s why his death from complications comes as such a shock.

    Yandex holds nearly two-thirds of the search market share in Russia, and it one of the top search engines in the world (it passed Bing in terms of total monthly queries back in February). Yandex also offers a series of internet services, like free cloud storage and its own Android app store. It’s often called the “Google of Russia.”

    The term “Yandex” was first invented in 1993 by Volozh and Segalovich to describe their search technologies, and it means “yet another index.” Yandex.ru was first launched in 1997, and was incorporated as a standalone company in 2000.

  • Tumblr Makes a Big Porn Policy Reversal

    Here’s the thing about porn: no matter how you try to push it down, hide it, and otherwise prevent internet users from accessing it – porn will find a way.

    Ask Tumblr CEO David Karp, who over the weekend issued a ‘clarification’ that really amounted to a reversal in policy concerning “NSFW & Adult’ blog visibility on the site. This move came in response to user backlash over a recent shift in Tumblr’s adult content policies that didn’t quite remove porn from the network, but made it a hell of a lot hard to find.

    “All, we’ve heard from a bunch of you who are concerned about Tumblr censoring NSFW/adult content. While there seems to be a lot of misinformation flying around, most of the confusion seems to stem from our complicated flagging/filtering features. Let me clear up (and fix) a few things,” said Karp in a blog post.

    Last week, Tumblr introduced a new Adult blogs guidelines page that explained the blog network’s new rules concerning blogs tagged as both “NSFW” (mildly racy) and “Adult” (super racy). Per the new rules, both NSFW and Adult blogs could no longer appear in search pages for logged-out users and Adult blogs were stricken from both third party search engines (like Google) and Tumblr own internal search.

    Cue the outrage.

    Karp addresses the issue with the three-pronged approach. First, he says that they have fixed a “bug” that was preventing adult blogs from appearing in search results even when Safe Mode had been disabled.

    Second, Karp explains that there’s really nothing to be done about some tag searches being blocked in their mobile apps. The prevalence of porn related to many tag searches is risky to Tumblr’s standing in some app universes. Basically, Karp says that they could get banned for promoting such content. Good news, however: you can still access all of it from Tumblr’s mobile site.

    Finally, and most importantly, Karp says that adult blogs will now be placed back into Google:

    “Earlier this year, in an effort to discourage some not-so-nice people from using Tumblr as free hosting for spammy commercial porn sites, we started delisting this tiny subset of blogs from search engines like Google. This was never intended to be an opt-in flag, but for some reason could be enabled after checking off NSFW → Adult in your blog settings. This was confusing and unnecessary, so we’ve dropped the extra option. If your blog contains anything too sexy for the average workplace, simply check “Flag this blog as NSFW” so people in Safe Mode can avoid it. Your blog will still be promoted in third-party search engines,” he says.

    The previous move to restrict adult blogs from third party searches could have affected as many as 12.5 million blogs -making them virtually untrackable via search. This reversal should fix that. Blog owners, you can now exhale.

    “Aside from these fixes, there haven’t been any recent changes to Tumblr’s treatment of NSFW content, and our view on the topic hasn’t changed. Empowering your creative expression is the most important thing in the world to us. Making sure people aren’t surprised by content they find offensive is also incredibly important and we are always working to put more control in your hands,” says Karp.

    Porn and Tumblr go hand in hand – we know there’s a lot of it on the site. After Yahoo acquired Tumblr back in May, CEO Marissa Mayer said that Yahoo would not be restricting content. Later, Karp echoed her sentiment.

    But they did try to make it very hard to find. Now, NSFW blog owners can rest knowing their content won’t be completely buried.

  • The Ones That Make Your Business Look Good In Google’s Local Results

    Back in January, Google revealed that Google Business Photos were being used by 100,000 businesses, a number that has no doubt grown significantly in the first half of 2013. In late May, Google announced the expansion of the program into seven additional countries.

    Do you have business photos up in Google’s local results? Have Google Business Photos ever helped you decide where to go? Let us know in the comments.

    Google Business Photos give businesses a chance to show off their interiors to prospective customers, and further entice them into coming to their physical locations. Just as Google lets you virtually tour the Eiffel Tower or the abandoned Fukushima town of Namie-machi, Google will let you tour the inside of the coffee shop down the street or the florist downtown.

    Unlike with its more publicized endeavors, however, Google is not using its various Street View camera equipment to go inside every store around the world. It relies upon groups of local certified photographers which have applied and met Google’s requirements to become a Google Trusted Photographer. These photographers then find businesses to photograph to fill up Google with more interior imagery.

    We had a conversation with one of Google’s trusted photographers, who gave us a better idea of what it’s like to go through the process. Sue Ann Tomlinson runs SuePH Photography. She applied to be part of Google’s program back in November of 2011, and was called upon by the company the following April, when it invited her to join the program.

    Given how an online presence can make or break even a brick and mortar business these days, you would think businesses would be champing at the bit to have Google certified photos from inside their establishments make their way into the local search results, but that’s not always the case, Tomlinson tells us. Some businesses simply don’t want to have their interiors photographed for Google.

    “It’s about 50-50,” she says. “Some businesses see value, and others don’t. We are creating a buzz about Google Business Photos and the value of these services. When the right business is approached they do not hesitate and jump on the opportunity. In the last month I have seen more and more of this.”

    I would guess interest will continue to grow, especially as businesses see their competitors’ Google listings.

    On average (though it varies by square footage), Tomlinson says she shoots about 144 shots for a business.

    “I submit the imagery [to Google] for the virtual tour,” she explains. “Everything I submit gets posted to the clients’ Google+ Local page. The client has the option to remove or add photographs of their own to the Google+ Local page.”

    With only about half of businesses wanting their photos on Google, it only make sense that Tomlinson doesn’t just wait for businesses to come to her, though each Google Trusted Photographer is listed on the Google Business Photos site, where if a business is seeking this service, they can simply go and find a trusted photographer in their area.

    She says she hasn’t received many calls for work this way. Instead, she does more reaching out to businesses herself, and does so daily with referrals, calls, or visits to businesses based on market research.

    “I mainly target businesses with a heavy social media presence and new businesses just starting out,” Tomlinson tells us. “I also have built SuePH Photography on the power of referrals.”

    Google does not give any kind of assignments to its trusted photographers.

    “Each photographer is an independent business and/or trusted agency, and I work directly with each business I contact,” Tomlinson says. “As a qualified Business Photos Trusted Photographer I am able to run my own independent business – with free support from Google.”

    When asked how much professional time is being spent photographing businesses for Google, Tomlinson says, “That depends on how many shoots I schedule for the week. I can spend 4-10 hours a week just photographing. I plan to expand my business to include architectural and real estate services as my business grows.”

    In the state of Nevada, there are only seven Google Trusted Photographers operating, and in northern Nevada, it’s only three. There are over a hundred and twenty-five in the region of Nevada/California/Oregon.

    Interestingly, the photographers are not so much in competition with one another as they are collaborators.

    “I work with the two other GTP in the Reno market (Northern Nevada),” Tomlinson says. “We collaborate on pricing, leads and work together to market the program.”

    This is apparently a common dynamic. This recent al.com article discusses a trio of Birmingham area photographers working together to put together virtual tours of a least 150 places for Google.

    Between the 3 photographers in Reno, Tomlinson says, they are pushing 100+ tours.

    We’ve seen various businesses do some silly things in their business photos. For example, we recently saw a guy in an office posing with a lampshade on his head. Then there was this bizarre corporate costume party.

    “Most of my clients want to keep things professional and simply want to have an employee group shot,” Tomlinson tells us. “However, the most unusual virtual tours I have seen from other GTPs were for various ad agencies and marketing companies worldwide as you may have seen. Why not have fun with these tours and stand out even more?”

    Probably good advice. You want to be less boring than your competitors right?

    What are some interesting things you’ve seen businesses do in Google Business Photos? Has a photo you’ve seen on Google ever deterred you from going somewhere? Let us know in the comments.

  • Twitter Gets Direct Message Sync, Other Improvements

    Notification sync across devices should be a given in pretty much everything these days. In fact, it’s a major feature of Android and iOS. Now Twitter is finally joining the party.

    Twitter announced today that users will be able to sync direct messages across all of their devices. In other words, reading a direct message on one device will mark it as read across all of your other devices and the Web. It’s very convenient for those of us who use Twitter across the Web, a smartphone and a tablet.

    Direct message sync isn’t the only update hitting Twitter today though. The social network announced that it’s making more improvements to search results. Here’s what you’ll see now:

    Now when you search for people on Twitter, you may see an expanded user result that shows a full bio. This account preview makes it easier and faster to find and learn more about the accounts you’re looking for. And if you swipe the preview to the left, you’ll find similar accounts –– for example, if you search for the MLB, you’ll see suggestions for ESPN, Ken Rosenthal, and other MLB-related accounts. Additionally, a new in-app indicator in search results will show you when there are new Tweets for your query, making it easier for you to stay up to date on the latest Twitter conversation.

    These latest improvements to search are now available on Android, iOS and the Web.

    As for Twitter for iPhone, every Tweet details page includes a built-in Tweet composer for easy replying. The iPhone app is also getting the new people button that was already added to the Android app.

    Finally, Twitter for Mac’s Connect tab has been updated to include interactions (i.e. favorites, retweets and mentions). The app also supports six additional languages – Danish, Filipino, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish and Thai.

    The above update is now available on Twitter for iPhone, but it has yet to be released on Twitter for Android. We’ll update you when it becomes available on Google Play.

  • Facebook Graph Search Is Coming to All U.S. Users

    If you’re an English language-using, United States-based Facebook user and you’ve yet to be granted access to Facebook’s Graph Search feature – that’s about the change. Apparently, Facebook feels comfortable enough with the product to start rolling it out to the masses.

    Starting today, Graph Search will begin to roll out to “several hundreds of millions” of users over the course of this week. The users who are getting the upgrade are only those who use Facebook with the “U.S. English” language setting. A wider, global rollout will commence after that.

    Bottom line: If you’re in the U.S., you will have Graph Search by the end of this week.

    Facebook’s been testing (and reportedly improving) Graph Search since they first launched it in beta back in January. ABC News reports that Facebook is launching the product today with some improvements to speed and accuracy.

    Of course, its launch raised privacy concerns, and some users balked at the idea of any user now being given the opportunity to search all of their prior likes, photos, and app activities. In reality, Graph Search doesn’t make any information available that wasn’t already available – but it does make it easier to unearth old data.

    Concerns or no, Graph Search is about to be unleashed to a wider audience. Next up, at some point, Facebook may just finally release the new news feed to everyone.

    UPDATE: Facebook has made it official. Everyone in the U.S. should see a tip box appear when they log in that announces the Graph Search rollout.

    Facebook says that in the near future, Graph Search will get the ability to search posts and comments. They also say that they’re working on bringing it to mobile.

  • Franz Kafka Google Doodle Hits The U.S.

    Franz Kafka Google Doodle Hits The U.S.

    As previously reported, Google is celebrating the birthday of acclaimed writer Franz Kafka. The doodle went live yesterday on the other side of the world, when it became July 3rd, and now it’s up here in our neck of the woods.

    The doodle specifically honors “Die Verwandlung,” or “The Metamorphosis,” one of Kafka’s most well-known and influential stories, which was first published in 1915. Our own Josh Wolford discusses The Metamorphosis and Kafka’s life, death and legacy more here.

    Other well-known works include: “Der Process” (The Trial), and “Das Schloss” (The Castle).

    Take a look at some more recent Google Doodles here.

  • LinkedIn Search Gets Better on iOS and Android

    LinkedIn Search Gets Better on iOS and Android

    Like many social networks and other applications, LinkedIn’s fastest growing sector is mobile. A few months ago, when LinkedIn launched a pretty major mobile redesign, the company said that 27% of their unique visitors come from their mobile apps – up 15% from a year ago. Mobile pageviews have also increased by 250%.

    With that in mind, it’s no surprise that LinkedIn is looking for ways to make their mobile experience better. Today, LinkedIn is improving mobile search on both its iOS and Android apps.

    Starting today, you can now search, jobs, companies, and groups with the apps. Before, you could only search people. LinkedIn says that this will help users “take advantage of their ‘in between’ mobile moments.”

    “You can now search for more than just people on mobile. Find and discover more than 225 million professionals, 3 million Company Pages, 2 million Groups and thousands of job opportunities via the magnifying glass icon at the top of the navigation screen. If you’re meeting someone new at Microsoft, look up that person and the Microsoft Company Page beforehand to see things you have in common. While you’re at it, search for the Microsoft Surface group on LinkedIn to hear what people are saying about the product. And if you end up having a great meeting and loving Microsoft, you may even want to search for jobs at Microsoft,” says LinkedIn’s Tomer Cohen.

    April’s big mobile redesign brought a new activity stream that not only is more media-rich, but is also better all pulling in all types of content – updates from connections, news, and influencer posts. LinkedIn also debuted a new navigation page with a customizable menu.

    All of this mobile focus doesn’t means that LinkedIn is neglecting their desktop bread and butter, however. In the past couple of months, LinkedIn has added personalized insights to the homepage, given users more analytics into who’s viewing and interacting with their profiles, and allowed users to add photos and presentations directly inside updates.

    You can download the updates at the App Store and on Google Play.

  • Klout Now Factors Bing Searches into Your Score

    Starting today, Klout will begin to factor in another element when calculating your total score. Now, your Klout score includes Bing search prevalence. That means that your Klout score will improve based on how many times you’re searched for on Bing.

    Of course, what this does is move Klout score a little more out of the realm of social media influence and more toward all-around real-world influence.

    Klout uses Warren Buffett as an example of someone with juge real-world influence but not much in the way of social media influence (he’s only sent out a few tweets):

    As an example, consider someone like Warren Buffett. Obviously Warren has tremendous real world Klout, but he isn’t particularly active on social media, with only three Tweets to his name. His relative influence can be challenging to measure with just the available online data. Our first step in solving the Buffett problem was to incorporate Wikipedia data into the Klout Score. Today, with the inclusion of Bing search results, our ability to measure influence beyond social indicators has taken a big leap forward.

    Microsoft and Klout have had a partnership since last fall – Bing made a significant investment and added Klout to their social sidebar. Last week, Klout integrated with Microsoft property Yammer.

    Obviously this is one of the reasons that Klout score factors in searches from Bing but not Google.

    “We think this is exciting because we believe search is one of the most direct indicators of real world influence and serves as a bridge between offline and online influence,” says Klout.

  • Google Search Android App Gets New Google Now, Voice And Offers Features

    Google has launched an update to the Google Search app for Android with some new Google Now features, Voice actions and Offers integration.

    There are new Google Now TV cards. Google explains in a Google+ post, “If you have an internet-connected TV, Google Now can help unlock more information about what you’re watching. Just connect your Android device to the same network that your TV is on and tap ‘Listen for a TV show’ in Google Now.”

    Watching Live TV

    “We will show you information, like where you’ve seen an actor in the cast before, or more information about the people mentioned in the show,” says Google. “So if you were watching Nik Wallenda cross the Grand Canyon this weekend, with Google Now, you could learn that the ‘King of the Wire’ in fact holds seven Guinness World Records, including highest bike ride on a high-wire.”

    The TV feature is US-only, and requires the phone/tablet to be on the same network as the TV.

    Th app also adds reminders for saved offers from Google Offers when you’re near the store.

    Also listed in the “what’s new” section for the app on Google Play is a new voice action to play music from your phone or the Play Store and voice actions tips.

  • European Court Says Google Does Not Have To Remove Search Results

    Often, when people find undesirable search results about themselves, they want Google to remove them. On the surface, this is understandable. You found it on Google, so Google should remove it right?

    Actually, no. Wrong.

    As Google has explained many times in the past, it does not remove content simply because you don’t like it. It only removes content when legally obligated to.

    The European Court of Justice has now decided that Google does not have to delete links that damage a person’s reputation. Jo Best at ZDNet runs down the case:

    The decision comes after the case of a Spanish man whose property was sold due to non-payment of social security debts — a fact that came up in a newspaper article when the man’s name was Googled 10 years later.

    The individual asked Google to remove links to the newspaper article when a search was performed on his name, and filed a complaint with Spain’s data protection watchdog the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD). The AEPD upheld the compliant, and said Google should remove the newspaper article from its index.

    Google appealed to the Spanish high court, which referred the decision onto the European Court of Justice.

    Google has been not only consistent regarding its message about this kind of thing, but it even abides by this code when it finds itself under scrutiny. The subject of search result removal even came up last week as Google discussed its efforts to combat rogue pharmacies. When it comes to organic search results, the company maintains its long-standing policy that it is not Google’s place to determine what content should be censored and what should not.

  • Google SafeSearch Changes Finally Hit Germany, France, and Other Non-English Speaking Countries

    Back in December, Google made some subtle changes to their Image search. To make a long story short, Google made it so that users in the U.S. could no longer disable SafeSearch altogether. At first glance, it appeared as though Google was simply censoring adult content in Image Search – but that wasn’t the case. What they did do, however, is make it harder to unearth.

    I argued that this fragmented Google Image Search and in the end, made it worse. By choosing to alter the steps users had to take to find adult images, Google made their Image Search product weaker and less able to generate the most relevant results for individual queries. But more on that later.

    About a month later, those Image Search changes hit other English-speaking countries – including U.K., Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. And now, it appears as though they’re spreading to some non-English speaking countries around the world.

    Ok, back to the long story. On the face of it, what Google has done is change the filtering options for Image Search. The old Image Search allowed users to select one of three levels of SafeSearch – STRICT, MODERATE, and OFF. Strict SafeSearch would filter out anything with a hint of NSFW content. Moderate, as you would expect, was somewhere in the middle – bikini shots ok, but exposed breasts a no-go, for instance. Turning SafeSearch off completely meant that your image results were completely unfiltered. For most queries, that’s the best way to find relevant content.

    Now, the new SafeSearch options that hit the U.S. in December, other English-speaking countries in January, and now places like Germany, France, and Spain, are a lot less varied. Now, you only have the ability to “filter explicit results” – that’s it (and report images, of course). The baseline Google Image Search is now set to MODERATE, and there’s no way to fully turn off SafeSearch.

    That doesn’t mean that you can no longer find adult images with Google Image Search. Google is not censoring these images. They’re just making you add qualifiers to your searches in order to find them.

    For instance, a search for “boobs” now produces moderate-level SFW content – no exposed breasts, just bras, bikinis, and such. If you choose to “filter explicit results,” it completely wipes out all results.

    Here’s the new SafeSearch options for google.de (Germany):

    And here are the SafeSearch options for google.se (Sweden):

    Now, if someone wanted to see NSFW results for “boobs,” they would have to add something else – “boobs porn” or “boobs nude,” for instance.

    The problem with this is that by making some moderate level of SafeSearch mandatory, Google is making image searches worse. It’s not truly showing the most relevant images for each query – it’s only showing the most relevant PG-13 results for each query.

    The problem gets worse if you search a term with a little less ambiguity. For instance, you can’t tell me that these are the most relevant results for the search “pussy.”

    Here’s what I had to say about how it makes Google Image Search worse back when Google first enacted the changes. I know the language is a little crass, but it’s the only way to get the point across:

    Ok, so the point here is that users need to be specific with their searches. Got it. Apologies for the frankness, but if I want to find pussy images, I now have to search “pussy porn.” There is now no way that I can edit my own personal settings to make a search for just “pussy” yield all results, both NSFW and otherwise.

    In essence, Google is fragmenting their image search. A “no filter” search is a true search of the most popular images across the web. U.S. users no longer have this option. We’re now only given the choice between filtered results for “pussy” or the most popular results for “pussy porn.” That smattering of all results, both NSFW and SFW for the query “pussy,” cannot be achieved anymore.

    Plus, is there really a question about what I’m looking for when I search “pussy?” Do I really need to provide any more detail?

    It seems like a big gripe about a small change, and it is in a way. But one could make the argument that this actually is a form of censorship. If I go to Google images and search “pussy,” I want to see the best of what the web has to offer – all of it. Not what Google thinks I should see based on their desire to prevent adult results unless users are super specific.

    Go ahead and try a search for “pussy” on Google Images right now. Those aren’t really very relevant results, are they? Users should see the most relevant results for their searches, no matter what. And they should have the option to simply turn off the SafeSearch filter, which they all had just a couple of days ago.

    Google’s SafeSearch support page tells us how to disable SafeSearch, but it only tells us how to turn off SafeSearch Filtering. That still leaves us with a “MODERATE” level SafeSearch and no way to see all web results, both NSFW and SFW at once for a single query.

    “We are not censoring any adult content, and want to show users exactly what they are looking for — but we aim not to show sexually-explicit results unless a user is specifically searching for them. We use algorithms to select the most relevant results for a given query. If you’re looking for adult content, you can find it without having to change the default setting — you just may need to be more explicit in your query if your search terms are potentially ambiguous. The image search settings work the same way as in web search,” Google told me back in December.

    The changes are subtle, yes. But they do make for an Image Search that feels lacking. Shouldn’t Google be about providing the best search results, not just the best moderately non-explicit results? Or at least still give users the option to disable SafeSearch completely?

    I’ve reached out to Google for comment and will update this article accordingly.