WebProNews

Tag: Search

  • Google Still Working On Kid Versions Of Its Products

    Google Still Working On Kid Versions Of Its Products

    Earlier this year news came out that Google was looking at catering to a whole new market – kids under thirteen years old.

    The Wall Street Journal reported at the time that the company was working on a new system that would let parents set up accounts for kids, and control how they use services and what info is collected about them.

    The Journal’s source said it’s Google’s response to people who are already trying to sign their kids up for the company’s products. Apparently they want to make sure it’s handled right and lawfully.

    The Information, which first reported on Google’s plans back in the summer, said Google would offer a dashboard for parents to oversee kids’ activities. This would be in addition to a kid-friendly version of YouTube.

    We haven’t really heard more about any of this in quite a while until now. USA Today has a new report out after speaking with Pavni Diwanji, VP of engineering at Google, who is leading the initiative. The report quotes her:

    “We expect this to be controversial, but the simple truth is kids already have the technology in schools and at home,” says the mother of two daughters, ages 8 and 13. “So the better approach is to simply see to it that the tech is used in a better way.”

    “We want to be thoughtful about what we do, giving parents the right tools to oversee their kids’ use of our products,” says Diwanji, who will attend the White House ceremony. “We want kids to be safe, but ultimately it’s about helping them be more than just pure consumers of tech, but creators, too.”

    These products are apparently due out next year, though the report doesn’t get into the specifics on which ones, other than to speculate about Search, Chrome, and YouTube.

    Image via Google

  • Google Has Some Right To Be Forgotten Guidelines To Work With

    As we here in the U.S. were entering holiday mode last week, official “Right to Be Forgotten” guidelines made their way to the public over in Europe. These come from the Article 29 Working Party, which is made up of data protection officials from throughout the European Union.

    In case you haven’t been keeping up, the Right to Be Forgotten came as the result of a ruling a few months ago. It enables people to request that search results about them be removed from search engines. Search engines like Google have been tasked with determining whether or not requests are legitimate as well as which ones to act upon. Search engines obviously don’t like removing results because it’s a form of censorship.

    Now, at least the engines have some guidelines to use as criteria for their evaluations rather than just kind of wining it as Google has been doing so far. The search engine, for the record, has been discussing approaches with various experts around the world.

    The new guidelines are as follows:

    Does the search result relate to a natural person – i.e. an individual? And does the search result come up against a search on the data subject’s name?

    Does the data subject play a role in public life? Is the data subject a public figure?

    Is the data subject a minor?

    Is the data accurate?

    Is the data relevant and not excessive?

    Is the information sensitive within the meaning of Article 8 of the Directive 95/46/EC?

    Is the data up to date? Is the data being made available for longer than is necessary for the purpose of the processing?

    Is the data processing causing prejudice to the data subject? Does the data have a disproportionately negative privacy impact on the data subject?

    Does the search result link to information that puts the data subject at risk?

    In what context was the information published?

    Was the original content published in the context of journalistic purposes?

    Does the publisher of the data have a legal power – or a legal obligation– to make the personal data publicly available?

    Does the data relate to a criminal offence?

    Here’s the full document, which elaborates on each of these, courtesy of Search Engine Land (or you can find it on the government website here):

    The blog also points to some findings from Forget.me including that Bing has only received about seven hundred requests to Google’s one hundred and sixty thousands.

    Image via Google

  • Bing Launches Homepage Improvements

    Bing Launches Homepage Improvements

    Microsoft announced that it will now feature high-definition images on its home page, as well as new image captions, customization features and quick access to Office Online.

    The daily homepage image will be wide-screen and HD (1920×1080 pixels).

    “We get a lot of feedback about the homepage image, whether you’re trying to figure out where or what the image is during your coffee break or playing a guessing game with your students or children,” says Bing in a blog post. “That feedback inspired us to redesign how we share information about the homepage, by creating an image caption that works a little like the title cards you might see next to a piece of artwork in a gallery or museum. So now you can move your mouse over the Info button to reveal the new image caption and click to learn more or download the image to use as your desktop wallpaper.”

    “People generally like the carousel of trending topics at the foot of the Bing homepage, but many ask how it could reflect their interests a little more,” Bing adds. “You can [now] customize your experience to follow news, stocks, weather, or even track a flight right from the Bing homepage.”

    You can now also minimize the carousel completely to see the homepage picture better. You can further control the size and motion of the homepage via the gear icon.

    Finally, Bing users will notice an Office Online link at the top of the page, which serves as a drop-down menu for the product’s various apps.

    All of this stuff is available in all markets today. Most will see the updates automatically, but some will have to switch on the HD in the settings.

    Image via Bing

  • Yahoo Takes Major Search Partner Away From Google

    Yahoo may have lost its way in search over the years, but it would appear that CEO Marissa Mayer is determined to bring search back to the forefront. Going to head with her former employer in its specialty may not be an easy feat, but she’s doing everything she can, it would seem, to cement Yahoo’s brand back into search relevance. Keep in mind, Yahoo was the king of search at one point, and a lot of people are frustrated with Google for various reasons (look no further than the comment sections on our Google search articles for proof of that).

    Can Yahoo make a significant comeback in search? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Yahoo and Mozilla announced a strategic five-year partnership making Yahoo Search the default search engine for Firefox in the United States both on mobile and desktop.

    “This is the most significant long-term partnership for Yahoo in five years,” a spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews. “As part of this, Yahoo will introduce an enhanced search experience, which U.S. Firefox users will receive first in December 2014.”

    This is huge news for both parties as well as for search in general. Google has been the global default search experience in Firefox for the past ten years. While Chrome has emerged in the meantime, Firefox remains a popular browser, and should give Yahoo a significant boost in searches.

    Here’s what the desktop web browser market share looked like last month (via Wikipedia):

    The Mozilla Google deal came up for renewal this year, and Mozilla decided to review its competitive strategy and explore its options.

    “In evaluating our search partnerships, our primary consideration was to ensure our strategy aligned with our values of choice and independence, and positions us to innovate and advance our mission in ways that best serve our users and the Web,” said CEO Chris Beard. “In the end, each of the partnership options available to us had strong, improved economic terms reflecting the significant value that Firefox brings to the ecosystem. But one strategy stood out from the rest.”

    Firefox will on longer have a single global default search provider. Mozilla says it’s adopting a “more local and flexible” approach with different partnerships for different countries. While Yahoo is the U.S. partner, it’s Yandex in Russia and Baidu in China. In all, Firefox will have 61 different search providers pre-installed across 88 different language versions. Google will still be among those options, and it will continue to power Safe Browsing and Geolocation features in Firefox. Google will also remain the default in Europe.

    That could change, however, and given that Mozilla and Yahoo are now buddies, you have to wonder if Yahoo will eventually take the reins there too.

    Mayer said, “We’re thrilled to partner with Mozilla. Mozilla is an inspirational industry leader who puts users first and focuses on building forward-leaning, compelling experiences. We’re so proud that they’ve chosen us as their long-term partner in search, and I can’t wait to see what innovations we build together. Yahoo, we believe deeply in search – it’s an area of investment, opportunity and growth for us. This partnership helps to expand our reach in search and also gives us an opportunity to work closely with Mozilla to find ways to innovate more broadly in search, communications, and digital content.”

    “Our teams worked closely with Mozilla to build a clean, modern, and immersive search experience that will launch first to Firefox’s U.S. users in December and then to all Yahoo users in early 2015. The interactive and integrated experience also better leverages our world-class content and personalization technologies,” she said. “Search inspires us because we think it’s something that will change and improve dramatically, and because fundamentally, search is about human curiosity — and that is something that will never be finished.”

    “Search is a core part of the online experience for everyone, with Firefox users alone searching the Web more than 100 billion times per year globally,” said Beard. “Our new search strategy doubles down on our commitment to make Firefox a browser for everyone, with more choice and opportunity for innovation. We are excited to partner with Yahoo to bring a new, re-imagined Yahoo search experience to Firefox users in the U.S. featuring the best of the Web, and to explore new innovative search and content experiences together.”

    In recent years, Yahoo has become known more for its display advertising business than its search business, but in its most recent earnings report, it actually revealed that it’s doing better in search. The company saw its eleventh quarter of year-over-year search revenue growth with price-per-click up in most regions.

    “We continue to find ways to enhance the performance of our search ads through better user interfaces and higher quality traffic and as advertisers ultimately find our search ads more valuable,” Mayer said at the time.

    She also talked a little about search on the conference call that followed the earnings release. She said, “When we think about what will search look like, on a phone, on a smaller device 10 years from now, we think it looks pretty different then it looks today. We really like the Aviate technology that we acquired we’ve been looking at how can really enrich the experience such that its not a lot of different answers perfectly ranked but actually the one answer you need when you’re on the go, or you’re working in a more constrained display, real constrained screening environment.”

    More on the Aviate acquisition here.

    As you probably know, Yahoo made a deal with Microsoft in the pre-Mayer years, which saw Bing powering Yahoo search, but it’s become increasingly clear that Mayer isn’t a big fan of the deal, and it will likely end eventually. Having a partnership with Mozilla will help it better compete with both Google and Microsoft, which of course uses Bing for its Internet Explorer browser.

    Interestingly enough, it sounds like Bing doesn’t think it will really ever be able to take significant market share away from Google when it comes to core search.

    For what it’s worth, the Yahoo/Bing partnership saw its biggest paid search market share increase in five years in Q3.

    As far as Firefox goes, Mozilla is doing plenty to keep its flagship product relevant, which will only help Yahoo in the United States. It recently announced some major privacy-related initiatives, and that’s something that’s been on a lot of people’s minds, particularly since the whole NSA/PRISM scandal came to light. By the way, under the partnership, Mozilla says Yahoo will support Do Not Track in Firefox.

    Mozilla is also courting developers with a new Developer Edition of Firefox.

    As of this summer, Mozilla is under new leadership as Beard became CEO, though he’s been “deeply involved with every aspect of Mozilla” since 2004.

    Google’s dominance has been helped by partnerships like the ones it has held with Google and Apple over the years, but those are starting to break down. Apple has also been distancing itself from Google reliance in a variety of ways over the past couple years.

    Google is too big at this point to face any major threat, but losing such significant partnerships has to hurt it to some extent. And if you’ll recall, when Google released its latest earnings report, one of the storylines was whether or not Google’s core business is actually in trouble. Some analysts seem to think it might be as growth has slowed. Google has also seen twelve straight quarters of ad price decline.

    In case you haven’t noticed, Yahoo has been making a lot of acquisitions over the past couple years, and has been launching major overhauls to its core products while getting rid of others so it can focus on the ones that really matter. It’s hard to argue that Mayer hasn’t breathed new life into the company since she took over.

    Yahoo doesn’t have to become top dog in search again to have a major impact on the web and businesses. Either way, for the first time in a long time, it would seem that Yahoo has plenty to be excited about when it comes to search.

    Do you use Firefox? Yahoo Search? Do you you think Yahoo is headed in the right direction? Discuss.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Twitter Regretting Not Getting That Google Deal Done?

    Twitter Regretting Not Getting That Google Deal Done?

    Remember the days when you could search for something that was in the news on Google and get a set of realtime search results comprised mainly (but not solely) of updates from Twitter? It was a helpful feature that let you get a glance at what people were saying about a given topic at that moment, and in some cases, provided the absolute most relevant results Google could possibly deliver.

    The realtime search feature went away after Google and Twitter failed to reach an agreement that would have extended the partnership. Twitter continued a similar partnership with Bing, but that just doesn’t get the usage Google does, and it appears now that Twitter may have some regrets about letting that Google deal fall apart.

    This week, Twitter held its Analyst Day event, where it discussed some things it is doing to help promote user growth. One thing it didn’t really go into in its blog post about various projects it’s working on to accomplish that, is trying to get more search traffic. This is something that would obviously come if that deal were still in place. Marketing Land reports:

    During the event this morning, Twitter’s CFO Anthony Noto suggested that Twitter would do more to generate search engine optimization traffic, free traffic from Google and other search engines. It’s something Noto said Twitter hadn’t really done in the past.

    Trevor O’Brien, Twitter’s director of product management, expanded on this later to say that Twitter made a change earlier this year to allow Google and other search engines to crawl its top 50,000 hashtagged search pages, which has generated a 10-fold increase in the number of logged-out people coming to Twitter — helping that figure rise to 75 million per month.

    It’s unclear whether Twitter has approached Google about starting up that deal again, which would actually benefit users to some extent, though it’s hard to say if Google would be interested at this point.

    Truth be told, Google’s feature was never really as helpful for realtime searches as a search directly on Twitter anyway, but again, there are a lot more people using Google in the first place.

    It’s worth noting that Twitter wasn’t a public company that had to worry so much about pleasing investors concerned about user growth when it didn’t renew its deal with Google.

    Image via Twitter

  • Bing: We’re Not Giving Up On Search [Updated]

    Update 2: Asked for additional comment or further clarification on Stefan’s comments, the spokesperson says, “We have nothing further to share.”

    Update: The initial headline to this article was “Bing Abandons Hope Of Competing With Google (In ‘Pure’ Search)”. Bing apparently takes issue with this. A spokesperson says it’s a “misrepresentation of Bing’s position, as well as Stefan Weitz’s statement. Bing is not giving up on search.”

    Well, the headline didn’t exactly say “Bing is Giving Up On Search,” but clearly they’re defensive about it. I’ve reached out to Bing for a more official statement.

    It’s unclear if they were okay with Search Engine Land’s version: “Bing: It’s Unlikely That We’ll Take Search Share Away From Google”. It’s also unclear if the Register’s quotes were inaccurate. So far, I don’t see any updates on either of these articles. Take from that what you will.

    Original article: It’s been a while since we’ve heard much about the “Bing it On” challenge, which was Bing’s attempt to convince people it provided a better search experience than Google, even though the challenge stripped out key features of both search engines. It did little to advance Bing’s market share.

    The holidays are just around the corner, and we haven’t seen any new “Scroogled” campaigns (because it’s a play on Scrooge, not “Screw Google,” remember?) emerge yet. That could still happen. These ads didn’t always focus on search, but stretched into other areas like email and computers.

    It appears that Bing is basically abandoning hope that it will actually take a significant amount of market share away from Google when it comes to pure search. Bing’s Stefan Weitz spoke at the Web Summit this week. The Register (via Search Engine Land) shares some quotes from him:

    “The question is, where is search really going?” he said at the Web Summit conference in Dublin today. “It’s unlikely we’re going to take share in [the pure search] space, but in machine learning, natural language search… and how we can make search more part of living. For us, it’s less about Bing.com, though that’s still important. It’s really about how we can instead weave the tech into things you’re already doing.”

    “For pure keyword search, we’re around 30 per cent in the US, not so much in Europe,” he said. “But search in different areas of life? That mix is to be determined. I’m committed to making sure we have our fair share of search in the future.”

    In terms of advertising, the Yahoo Bing “search alliance” saw its biggest paid search market share increase in five years in Q3, according to research released by IgnitionOne. This followed Yahoo’s search market share hitting its lowest point ever in the summer, though things are looking up for Yahoo on the search front based on the company’s latest earnings report.

    Image via Bing.com (Yes, you can just type in a “W” and get a suggestion to go to www.Google.com).

  • Is The Matt Cutts Era Over?

    Is The Matt Cutts Era Over?

    It’s not 100% clear yet, but it’s looking like for webmasters and SEOs, the era of Matt Cutts is a thing of the past. His career at Google may continue, but it doesn’t sound like he’ll be the head of webspam going forward.

    Would you like to see Matt Cutts return to the role he’s held for years, or do you look forward to change in the search department? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    It’s a pretty interesting time in search right now. Matt Cutts, who has been the go-to guy for webmaster help and Q&A related to Google search for quite a few years, has been on leave from the company since July. Meanwhile, his counterpart over at Bing has been let go from his duties at Microsoft.

    When Cutts announced his leave, he didn’t really make it sound like he wouldn’t be back, but rather like he would be taking a nice,long, much-deserved vacation. He wrote on his blog:

    I wanted to let folks know that I’m about to take a few months of leave. When I joined Google, my wife and I agreed that I would work for 4-5 years, and then she’d get to see more of me. I talked about this as recently as last month and as early as 2006. And now, almost fifteen years later I’d like to be there for my wife more. I know she’d like me to be around more too, and not just physically present while my mind is still on work.

    So we’re going to take some time off for a few months. My leave starts next week. Currently I’m scheduled to be gone through October. Thanks to a deep bench of smart engineers and spam fighters, the webspam team is in more-than-capable hands. Seriously, they’re much better at spam fighting than I am, so don’t worry on that score.

    Scheduled to be gone through October. See? Pretty much sounds like a vacation. As you know, October has since come and gone. On October 31, Cutts provided another update, saying he was extending his leave, and wouldn’t be back at Google this year.

    Ok, fine. Cutts has been at Google for fourteen years, and can probably take a considerable amount of time off with no problem. But he’d be back in the swing of things in the new year, right? Well, he might be back, but what he’ll be doing remains to be seen.

    Cutts appeared on the web chat show This Week in Google, hosted by Leo Laporte, who asked him if he’ll go back to the same role, or if this is a chance for him to try something different. This part of the conversation starts at about 9 minutes and 50 seconds in to the video below (h/t: Search Engine Roundtable).

    “Well, I really have been impressed with how well everyone else on the team is doing, and it’s created a little bit of an opportunity for them to try new things, explore different stuff, you know, approach problems from a different way, and so we’ll have to see how it goes,” Cutts responded. “I loved the part of my job that dealt with keeping an eye on what important news was happening related to Google, but you know, it’s not clear that having me as a lightning rod, you know for, you know unhappy black hat SEOs or something is the best use of anybody’s time compared to working on other things that could be making the world better for Google or in general. So we’ll see how it all works.”

    It doesn’t really sounds like he intends to go back to the classic Matt Cutts role. In fact, later in the discussion, he referred to the initial leave as the “official” leave, implying that the one he’s now on is open-ended.

    Laporte asked him if he has the ability at the company to just do something different if he wants to.

    He said, “The interesting thing is that at Google they try to get you and go do different projects, so the product managers, they encourage you to rotate every two or three years, and so it’s relatively rare to find people who have been around forever in a specific area. You’ll find Amit [Singhal] in search, Sridhar [Ramaswamy], you know, some of these people that are really, really senior, you know – higher ranking than me for sure – they do stick around in one area, but a lot of other people jump to different parts of the company to furnish different skills and try different things, which is a pretty good idea, I think.”

    Again, it sounds like he would really like to do something different within the company.

    He also reiterated his confidence in the current webspam team. On his “colleagues” (he prefers that term to “minions”), he said, “I just have so much admiration for you know, for example, last year, there was a real effort on child porn because of some stuff that happened in the United Kingdom, and a lot of people chipped in, and that is not an easy job at all. So you really have to think hard about how you’re gonna try to tackle this kind of thing.”

    Jeff Jarvis, who was also on the show, asked Cutts what other things interest him.

    Cutts responded, “Oh man, I was computer graphics and actually inertial trackers and accelerometers in grad school. At one point I said, you know, you could use commodity hardware, but as a grad student, you don’t have access to influence anybody’s minds, so why don’t I just go do something else for ten years, and somebody else will come up with all these sensors, and sure enough, you’ve got Kinect, you have the Wii, you know, the iPhone. Now everybody’s got a computer in their pocket that can do 3D sensing as long as write the computer programs well. So there’s all kinds of interesting stuff you could do.”

    Will we see Matt working on the Android team? As a matter of fact, Laporte followed that up by mentioning Andy Rubin – the guy who created Android and brought it to Google – leaving the company. News of that came out last week.

    Matt later said, “I’ll always have a connection and soft spot for Google…”

    That’s actually a bit more mysterious of a comment. I don’t want to put any words in the guy’s mouth, but to me, that sounds like he’s not married to the company for the long haul.

    Either way, webmasters are already getting used to getting updates and helpful videos from Googlers like Pierre Far and John Mueller. We’ve already seen Google roll out new Panda and Penguin updates since Cutts has been on leave, and the SEO world hasn’t come crumbling down.

    I’m guessing Cutts is getting less hate mail these days. He must have been getting tired of disgruntled website owners bashing him online all the time. It’s got to be nice to not have to deal with that all the time.

    As I said at the beginning of the article, it’s really not clear what Matt’s future holds, so all we can really do is listen to what he’s said, and look for him to update people further on his plans.

    In the meantime, if you miss him, you can peruse the countless webmaster videos and comments he’s made over the years that we’ve covered here.

    Do you expect Matt Cutts to return to search in any capacity? Do you expect him to return to Google? Should he? Do you miss him already? Let us know what you think.

  • Report: Big-Spending SMBs Prioritize Search

    Search engine marketing is the top digital marketing priority for most higher-spending small and medium-sized businesses, according to anew report from BIA/Kelsey. These are businesses spending over $25,000 a year on advertising and promotion. On average, they’re spending $79,000.

    60.6% rated search advertising and marketing (including SEO) as an “extremely high” or “very high” priority for the coming twelve months. 20.7% reported using PPC advertising in the previous 12 months, compared to 19.6% in 2013.

    “The LCM [Local Commerce Monitor – the study] findings indicate small businesses want to improve on the ability for consumers to discover them,” said Steve Marshall, director of research, at BIA/Kelsey. “SEM, SEO, and pay per click are fundamental to achieving this goal, particularly with the growth of mobile search.”

    According to the firm, local search revenues are expected to reach $7.2 billion in 2015, which would be up from $7.1 billion this year. It maintains that local mobile search will account for 51.1% of mobile ad spending in 2015.

    The LCM recently found that small businesses spend more on social media than any other media category with Facebook dominating at 55.1% of SMBs reporting they have Pages.

    BIA/Kelsey will release additional findings at an upcoming local media conference in December.

    Image via BIA/Kelsey

  • Yahoo Taps Hipmunk For Flight And Hotel Search

    Yahoo Taps Hipmunk For Flight And Hotel Search

    Hipmunk announced that it has been named Yahoo’s exclusive flight and hotel search provider, and is now integraed with Yahoo Travel, giving users access to Hipmunk’s own travel search offerings.

    Hipmunk CEO Adam Goldstein said, “After our recent funding round, forging alliances that introduce Hipmunk to new audiences is a key part of our growth strategy. We’re excited to offer our experience to a new set of users while enabling Yahoo Travel to provide its users a great metasearch experience.”

    “For flights, users can use the ‘agony’ filter which sorts flights by price, duration, and number of stops, so that the most convenient options are shown first,” the company notes in a blog post. “Those who search for hotels see them sorted by ‘ecstasy’ which filters by price, amenities, and reviews. In addition, hotel searchers are able to refine hotel results by proximity to a particular point of interest by using the interactive map.”

    The new integration is available both on desktop and mobile. Hipmunk has over a million listings.

    This follows Yahoo’s recent deal with Yelp, which sees the popular online review service power local listings.

    While Yahoo may rely on various third-party providers for its search results (Microsoft’s Bing being the provider of web results), the company’s search business is actually on the way up as its recent earnings report showed.

    Image via Yahoo

  • Here’s How To Disable Google’s Sitelinks Search Box

    Last month, Google announced that it is now showing a new and improved sitelinks search box within search results for some sites. Its aim is to help users find specific content on third-party sites more easily.

    The box is now more prominent, and supports autocomplete.

    Webmasters can markup their sites so Google has the ability to display this in search results for their brands. There’s also a way you can specifically tell Google you don’t want this to appear for your site.

    Barry Schwartz points to a Google+ post from Menashe Avramov pointing out that you can disable the box using the following meta tag:

    <meta name=”google” content=”nositelinksearchbox”>

    I guess this way, you can encourage users to actually use your site to do the searching. Either that, or it will encourage them to get more specific with their Google search. I’m not sure how often these boxes are being used anyway, but it must be a substantial enough amount of people for Google to even offer the feature.

    Image via Google

  • Yahoo Does Some New Search Personalization

    Yahoo announced that Yahoo Search is now showing personal results for signed-in users, which include upcoming flights, events, and packages. This is across mobile, tablet, and desktop.

    You can type “package,” or a store’s name, and you’ll see details at the top of your search results. You can search for “events” and get info or download tickets for approaching events. You can type “flights” or your airline name to see flight status.

    “These results are personal to you and only appear when you’re logged in. Don’t see your flight or event yet? We’re continuing to add new results for flights, packages, and more,” says Arun Simha, senior manager of search product operations at Yahoo.

    The company also announced travel and event notifications in Yahoo Mail for iOS and Android to further help you keep track of your flights and events.

    You can go to the “Today” section to find out if your flight is on time, delayed, or canceled. You can also get directions to the airport, call the airline, or go to the airline’s website.

    When you get to your destination, it will also give you suggestions for restaurants and attractions from Yelp. It also gives you event details for Eventbrite and Ticketmaster events.

    The features are only available in the U.S. for now.

    This comes as Yahoo is starting to generate more revenue from its search business than from its display ad business.

    Image via Yahoo

  • Yahoo Is Doing Better In Search Than Display

    Yahoo Is Doing Better In Search Than Display

    Yahoo came out swinging with its third quarter earnings report and conference call on Tuesday, posting solid results ahead of analysts’ estimates. One particularly noteworthy takeaway was that the company’s search advertising business brought in more money than its display business. This is the first time this has happened since Marissa Mayer took over as CEO.

    Search revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs was $450 million, up 6%. Paid clicks were flat year-over-year, but price per click increased about 17%.

    “This quarter represents our 11th quarter of search revenue growth year-over-year on a revenue ex-TAC basis,” Mayer said during the company’s earnings call. “Our price-per-click is up in almost all regions as we continue to find ways to enhance the performance of our search ads through better user interfaces and higher quality traffic and as advertisers ultimately find our search ads more valuable.”

    Display revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs was $396 million, down 6%. The number of ads sold did increase about 24%, but price-per-ad decreased about 24% at the same time.

    Meanwhile, Yahoo’s native ads have experienced triple-digit year-over-year growth.

    During the Q&A portion of the call, Yahoo was asked how search compares to display specifically on mobile.

    CFO Kenneth Goldman responded, “The search is somewhat higher than display. We don’t give the exact breakout, maybe we’ll in the future. But in search it’s also growing a little bit faster as well than display year-over-year.”

    Mayer said, “When we think about what will search look like, on a phone, on a smaller device 10 years from now, we think it looks pretty different then it looks today. We really like the Aviate technology that we acquired we’ve been looking at how can really enrich the experience such that its not a lot of different answers perfectly ranked but actually the one answer you need when you’re on the go, or you’re working in a more constrained display, real constrained screening environment.”

    More on the Aviate acquisition here.

    Mayer was also asked about its relationship with MIicrosoft in terms of whether it’s wrong to think of Yahoo as a distributor of Microsoft search. She basically sidestepped that one. It’s no secret that she’d not a fan of the arrangement.

    The subject came up again later in the call, and she offered, “I think on a whole we’re very bullish on search. It’s always been part of the Yahoo! We like where it’s going in future of mobile. We think it’s a right area for innovation and is an area that we have been investing in. We are coming to the mid-point of the ten-year agreement and we may want to contemplate changes on both sides. So Microsoft has some right to that point so do we. And we are working through this with Microsoft.”

    Image via Tumblr

  • Netflix Launches New Mobile Search Experience

    Netflix Launches New Mobile Search Experience

    Last month, Netflix launched a new search experience for its website, which included an “instant search” tool to give users quicker access to titles and actors.

    Over the weekend, the company announced a new search experience for mobile and tablets. They already began rolling it out to Android devices, and said an iPhone update would follow.

    The company said in a blog post, “Search is a key feature on mobile and tablet devices and many of our members use search to program their evening entertainment while on the go…With this update, we bring the visual presentation style for search results to mobile and tablet devices, allowing our members to quickly scan search results to discover great content. This concept already has proven successful on game consoles, smart TVs and the website.”

    The new look presents results in a grid of cover art. The company says it reduces cognitive load, and makes it easier to find what users are looking for. You can tap a cover and add it to your list, start playing it, or use Chromecast or AirPlay.

    “Finally this rollout expands the search function on the iPhone by enabling members to search for actors, directors and creators,” Netflix said. “We also now provide suggestions related to the query, which allows members to more easily explore the contents of the Netflix catalog.”

    When Netflix announced the new desktop experience, it included the ability to search for “netflix,” and bring up Netflix Original titles. This also works on the new mobile experience.

    Image via Netflix

  • Netflix Unveils Instant Search Feature

    Netflix Unveils Instant Search Feature

    Netflix announced the launch of a new search experience for its website, which includes an “instant search” tool, which gives users faster access to titles as well as actors.

    The company explains in a blog post, “For the new search experience, we use lush cover art that delivers a more visual presentation across the page. As you start typing your query, potential matches of TV shows and movies appear in the grid of cover art. The new style makes it easier for the user to scan the results and, combined with the infinite scroll functionality, gives the user an intuitive way to explore the Netflix catalog.”

    “A list of actors, directors and creators matching the query is shown on the left hand side,” it explains. “When clicking on any of those results, a new gallery will open with all the titles related to that person. The left rail is also used for suggestions related to genres, topical searches and searches for titles that are unavailable to stream. In each case, users see recommendations based on that suggestion, as shown in the screenshot below.”

    You can also type in “Netflix” to see all the titles listed as Netflix originals.

    The features appear to still be in the roll-out stage, so if you’re not seeing them just yet, you should soon. The functionality will come to other devices in time.

    It’s not very often that Netflix announces new features, so it’s interesting that we’re getting this just after the launch of the new social recommendation feature and reports of a short-form video offering.

    Image via Netflix

  • Dropbox for Android Gets Better At Search, Adds Document Previews

    It appears to be a good day for Android users in terms of getting better search features in third-party apps. As reported earlier, Tumblr has improved its search experience on Android. Now, Dropbox has launched an update for its Android app, adding document previews and a redesigned search experience.

    The company says it’s now quicker and easier to get to any of the stuff in your Dropbox. It now includes the ability to search in specific folders, or in your entire Dropbox. It keeps track of recent searches, and amkes typehead suggestions as you type in your search.

    “To make sure you don’t miss a thing, Dropbox highlights the names of matching files or folders as you type your search,” the company says in a blog post.

    “You can now instantly preview any Word document, PowerPoint presentation, or PDF in your Dropbox straight from your Android device,” it also notes. “This means you can view, scroll, and zoom in on your travel docs without needing to switch out of the Dropbox app.”

    In addition to these features, the app will now let you set view-only permissions on shared folders.

    The update is rolling out on Google Play this afternoon.

    Image via Dropbox

  • How Pinterest Is Thinking About Search

    How Pinterest Is Thinking About Search

    Most people probably think about Pinterest more as a social media site/app than a search engine, but search is increasingly the direction it is moving in, which not only makes sense for its loyal user base, but also as a monetization strategy as it gets going with its Promoted Pins ad product.

    Pinterest, lets you connect with friends, and that’s what keeps it in the realm of social media, but as co-founder Evan Sharp explains, it’s more about you than it is about your friends. It’s about finding stuff for life – discovery – and bookmarking that stuff for future reference and/or showing off your interests. Finding often means searching, which is why Pinterest has launched things like Guided Search and its enhanced recipe search functionality. Last month, it also upgraded its Place Search feature to make it faster and smarter.

    The Atlantic has an extensive interview with Sharp, who discusses how he views Pinterest versus how he viewed it back when it started (hint: it’s much more about search and discovery), among other things. Here are a couple snippets of what he had to say about search:

    Guided Search just says, when you search, what are the other things that people add to this search to help you understand the other possibilities. I only point this out, not to market it, but to highlight that the way we think of search is fundamentally different. It’s not just here is my query; it’s a process, a journey. You’re having a kid. You’re getting married. I don’t know what to do, I’ve never had a kid. Type in parenting, and you start to learn, what’s the language of this? On search engines, in general, the relationship to language is very different. You start with the words and you say I want to find these words. When you’re discovering something, we’re helping you figure out the language. If you are interested in discovering something new, you might not know what to type in. Here, the language is the end state…We’ve solved all sorts of discovery problems that people hadn’t even thought about, all kinds of information database problems that have never been thought about.

    …when people think of search they think of words, but there is all sorts of cool computer science you can build with just media, just the images, or just the user graph. And the combination of all that is going to be very interesting. The words are just one signal. They’re super important and we’ve got better words than anybody, but there is all kinds of stuff people don’t even think about because their tools are constrained by language….Search for most people is web navigation. It stitches together the human information on web pages. It’s also a tool for answering questions. We weave them together, but you could decompose those in an interesting way if you were interested in solving search as a problem.

    A few months ago, Pinterest raised a new $200 million round of funding. Making Pinterest better for search and discovery is to be the primary focus of how to use that money.

    CEO Ben Silbermann said at the time, “Pinterest has a vision of solving discovery and helping everyone find things they’ll love. This new investment gives us additional resources to realize our vision.”

    Last week, the company announced its acquisition of Icebergs, a service that lets users organize and share content for creative projects. They’re shutting the product down, but that gives you an idea of what the deal means for Pinterest.

    Icebergs’ team said in a blog post:

    We are thrilled to be joining forces with the talented Pinterest team in San Francisco. Pinterest is a visual discovery tool people use to discover, save, and act upon the things they love, which makes it a perfect home for our experience in product and design, and in building Icebergs.

    On Pinterest, there are tens of millions of people using the site to discover more than 30 billion Pins every day, and we can’t wait to use what we learned building Icebergs to help make their experience even better.

    As Pinterest continues to focus on search and discovery, it’s also enabling businesses to get in the action in more ways than one. In addition to the aforementioned Promoted Pins (the do-it-yourself version is on the way), it recently partnered with Shopify to automatically enable rich pins for merchants.

    Pinterest also just happens to be the second leading source of social media referrals to websites (behind Facebook).

    Image via Pinterest

  • History of SEO: Evolve or Die. 24 years in 4 minutes.

    Remember when Netscape Navigator and Ask Jeeves ruled the roost? Here’s a 4 minute throwback of how search engines have changed in the last 24 years. Learn how smart marketers figured out how to evolve with the changes.

    Courtesy of Customer Magnetism

  • Report: Paid Search Saw Record CTR In Q2

    Report: Paid Search Saw Record CTR In Q2

    Kenshoo released some new research looking at search and social advertising spend in Q2, finding that paid search delivered an all-time high click-through rate, and that Facebook ads continue to experience rapid growth.

    According to the firm, social advertising volumes spiked as new advertisers entered the market, testing ad solutions and audience targeting methods.

    Social ad spend increased 51% year-over-year and 21% quarter-over-quarter, while social impressions increased 13% year-over-year.

    Search ad spend increased 25% year-over-year and 2% quarter-over-quarter, while search click-through-rate increased 26% driving a 15% increase in clicks year-over-year.

    “The power of paid search and social has never been more evident than it was in Q2,” said Kenshoo CMO Aaron Goldman. “Marketers running search and social advertising through Kenshoo increased their ad spend consistently across both channels and saw revenue rise at faster rates, leading to tangible profit and ROI.”

    Kenshoo released this infographic looking at some of its findings:

    Kenshoo released a report last month finding that spending on Facebook ads helps the performance of search ads.

    On Wednesday, we looked at a report from Adobe finding that search spend in Q2 grew by 9% year-over-year, while Google CPCs saw an increase of 4% year-over-year.

    We should learn even more about search spend later today as Google releases its earnings report.

    Image via Kenshoo

  • Imgur Uses Tagging To Improve Search Experience

    Imgur Uses Tagging To Improve Search Experience

    Imgur just announced some new search and discovery features, which pull what it says is the best and most relevant content out for each user on a personalized basis.

    Over 1.5 million images are uploaded to Imgur every day, so you can see why discovery tools would be helpful.

    CEO Alan Schaaf says, “We’ve grown so quickly, and it’s critical that we continue to deliver an experience to our users that makes the time they spend on our site as personal to them, and as enjoyable as possible.”

    Essentially, images are now tagged by users, and these tags are used across the site. Users can use the tags to curate custom experiences. Users can also suggest and vote on image tags, which Imgur says will power new and “significantly enhanced” search capabilities.

    The company says sorting by category will help it identify trends as they’re happening, including when images go viral.

    “With 130 million users and 1.5 million images uploaded every day, there’s an incredible depth of amazing content to dive into,” says Schaaf. “This new set of features significantly empowers our community to explore and enjoy the full scope of the web’s most viral content.”

    The features also create new revenue opportunities for Imgur, specifically on the business development, partnership, and advertising fronts.

    And maybe it will help reddit users too.

    A few months ago, Imgur raised a $40 million round of funding. Read our conversation with Schaaf about the company’s plans here.

    Imgur has a blog post up on the new features here.

    Images via Imgur

  • Google Glass Was Made For Search

    Google Glass Was Made For Search

    Babak Parviz, known as the creator of Google Glass, who led the project until Google replaced him with Ivy Ross recently, spoke at the Wearable Technologies Conference this week. He told attendees that Glass is only one answer to what the next mobile platform could be, following smartphones and tablets.

    Remember, this is the guy who talked about some pretty amazing ideas for contact lenses, and is already working on Google’s contact lens project for diabetics.

    CNET recaps some of the things he talked about. One noteworthy item is that search was a driving factor behind Google developing the device in the first place:

    One of the main drivers for developing the device was being able to find information almost instantaneously. A Google search will give someone a reasonable answer to almost any question in about 10 seconds, he said. The goal for Glass was to “significantly shorten that time.” “Can we make it three seconds? One second? A fraction of a second?” he said.

    It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that search would be the main driver of this project, given that this is still how Google makes the bulk of its money.

    It’s still very early days for Glass, but those early parodies of the device’s concept video that showed viewers being overrun by ads isn’t sounding very far-fetched (if it ever was).

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Has a Jesus-Shaped Hole in Its Graph

    We already know that Google hates America, so it should be no surprise that the largest search engine in the world also hates Jesus.

    Search Engine Roundtable’s Barry Schwartz posted about a thread on the Google Web Search Help forum, in which one Google user says that he’s noticed something amiss with Google’s knowledge graph results. Apparently, Jesus doesn’t get his own knowledge graph result, but other prominent religious figures like Muhammad, Moses, and Buddha do.

    “Why the absence of Jesus?” asks Steve.

    I don’t know, Steve. You might be asking a bigger question than you think. But before tackling anything like that, let’s make sure Google is really throwing Jesus this major diss.

    Nope, no knowledge graph there.

    You won’t find a knowledge graph in searches for Jesus Christ, Christ, or Jesus of Nazareth either. In fact, for that latter search, Google suggests you see results about the 1977 television miniseries, Jesus of Nazareth, which I’m positive is what most people who search that phrase are looking for in the first place. Good on you, Google.

    Ok, so maybe Google just stays away from religious figures in knowledge graph results – just to play it safe.

    Nope.

    You’ll also find knowledge graphs for Moses, Buddha, and biblical figures like Judas Iscariot, King David, Solomon, and many more – even Adam and Eve.

    So, once again, where’s Jesus?

    Much of Google’s knowledge graph pulls from Wikipedia, and Jesus has quite the thorough Wikipedia page. The snippet from Wikipedia that would appear in a hypothetical knowledge graph box isn’t controversial, really:

    Jesus, also referred to as Jesus of Nazareth, is the central figure of Christianity, whom the teachings of most Christian denominations hold to be the Son of God. Christianity regards Jesus as the awaited Messiah of the Old Testament and refers to him as Jesus Christ, a name that is also used in non-Christian contexts.

    Yeah, that about sums it up. So why has Google purposefully removed Jesus’ knowledge graph?

    It turns out, Google is pretty inconsistent when it comes to religious figures and the knowledge graph. While you find graphs for Buddha, Muhammad, and Moses, you won’t find a graph for Vishnu, the Supreme God of Vaishnavism, one of the three main sects of Hinduism or Shiva, another popular Hindu deity. You won’t find a graph for Kirshna either.

    There’s no knowledge graph for God, Allah, or Yahweh either. What do Jesus, Vishnu, Allah, and these left-out entities have in common?

    They’re all God, or gods. Sure, Jesus Christ is also believed to be a human, the son of God. But in Christian teachings, Jesus is also God himself. It looks like Google is simply shying away from assigning any sort of god their own knowledge graph.

    “Possibly because of the ‘controversy’ surrounding Jesus. Everyone accepts who Muhammad, Moses and Buddha are, but not every-one accepts Jesus is the Son of God. If they define him as a prophet, Christians could take offense, if they define him as the Son of God, Muslims could take offense…. that is one argument it might be better to stay out off (if you are Google),” one Google user replies to Steve’s original question.

    Jesus doesn’t have a graph because Google isn’t touching that with a 39 and a half-foot pole. Google’s just staying away from deities. Even do a search for ancient deities – Ra, Zeus – no knowledge graph.

    Or, Google hates Jesus. You’ll most definitely find a graph result for The Big Bang.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons