WebProNews

Tag: search engines

  • Are You As Satisfied With The Google Experience As You Used To Be?

    Research out this week from Foresee finds that customer satisfaction with Google (and other search engines and social networks) is down significantly. The firm suggests that the proliferation of advertising (especially in search engines) is “diminishing the customer experience.”

    Do agree? Are ads making the search experience worse? Are you less satisfied with Google or other search engines than you were in the past? What about social networks? Let us know in the comments.

    According to Foresee, the e-business category (portals and search engines, social media and online news and information sites) dropped 3.9% to 71.3 on ACSI’s 100-point scale. 22% of search engine visitors polled cited ads as what they liked least about them. E-business is seeing its lowest score in a decade.

    “Advertising may be the necessary evil of e-business,” said Larry Freed, president and CEO of ForeSee. “Most e-businesses begin as a free service to gain traction with consumers and increase market share, but eventually they need to find a way to monetize their business. Unfortunately, consumers generally perceive the increase in advertising as detracting from their online experience.”

    “From 10,000 feet, the erosion of customer satisfaction with e-business suggests that the sector will have a bumpy road ahead. But the battle for customer preference is playing out at the customer-level,” said ACSI founder and chairman Claes Fornell. “Companies that can find a way to make money without compromising the customer experience will please both its users and investors.”

    While satisfaction with social networks is down, the research attributes the overall trend in e-business to dissatisfaction with search engines and portals, which is the largest category of the sector. The category saw a 3.8% drop to 76 – its lowest score since 2007.Google’s score is down 6% to 77, but things aren’t looking any better for its rivals. Bing is down 6%, Yahoo is down 3%.

    “The satisfaction scores make it appear to be a closer race, but it is still only a battle for second when it comes to search engines,” said Freed. “Nearly half of Google visitors use the site for most of their searches, while no other search engine comes even close to that kind of loyalty. Lower satisfaction across the board is leading more consumers to use multiple search engines or try a vertical search approach to get the information they’re looking for, though this is less true for Google.”

    The report says that the number of people who use Google exclusively for search has stayed consistent, while the proportion of exclusive users of other search engines has declined since last year. It says that search engines not named Google experienced an average drop of 30% in primary users, which are described as those who identify the site as their primary search engine.

    Social media is also failing to live up to customer satisfaction expectations with the category falling 1.4% to a score of 68.

    “The noise factor can detract from immersive experiences like Facebook and Twitter. Neither one is curated or edited, so users have to filter through ads, banter and irrelevant posts to find useful or entertaining threads or connections,” said Eric Feinberg, Foresee senior director of mobile, media and entertainment. “Wikipedia, as a managed site without advertising, doesn’t have that problem.”

    Wikipedia, which in my opinion should probably be put into the information sites category rather than social media, holds the top position in the category with a score of 72.

    Here’s an infographic Foresee put out to showcase its findings:

    ebusiness satisfaction

    Greg Sterling at Search Engine Land shares some interesting charts from the research.

    Online marketer AJ Kohn (Blind Five Year Old) comments on the Search Engine Land piece, “I think the advertising explanation is tremendously weak. Instead, I’d offer that the frequency of search is rising (those strange comScore numbers) and that they’re being performed on different devices (phones and tablets). High expectations of search success coupled with greater frequency of searches on a variety of devices would likely frustrate a subset of users.”

    Still, there are certainly plenty who think the Google experience, in particular has become to ad heavy, or at least ad and Google’s own product-heavy. A post by Aaron Harris at Tutorspree called “How Googel is Killing Organic Search” made the rounds earlier this month provoking an industry discussion about this very topic. While SEL’s Danny Sullivan does a great job of putting this whole thing into context with a number of caveats, the main finding in the post was that a particular query had Google only dedicating 13% of the page to true organic search results.

    On the other hand, there are times when ads and/or Google’s own products can provide satisfactory results. In fact, Google is clearly hoping to satisfy users on its own without having to point them to other sites with the whole Knowledge Graph thing. But are users actually satisfied with the results they’re getting?

    Are you more or less satisfied with Google than you were in years past? How about with other search engines or social networks? Let us know in the comments.

  • Yahoo Kills AltaVista, Axis, WebPlayer, Browser Plus, Downloads & More

    Late on Friday, Yahoo announced that it is shutting down 12 products over the coming months.

    First on the chopping block is Axis, and it was killed on June 28th. Axis was Yahoo’s attempt at a web browser, launched early last year ahead of the Marissa Mayer era. Axis was largely about the mobile experience, which is line with Yahoo’s greater strategy under Mayer, but Yahoo would likely rather see users just downloading the main Yahoo app and its various other offerings. We’ve heard very little about Axis since launch, so it’s not entirely surprising that it’s going away, even after such a short lifespan.

    “If you installed the browser plug-in, it will no longer work. If you downloaded the app, it will continue to work, but won’t be actively maintained,” says Yahoo EVP, Platforms, Jay Rossiter. “We encourage you to use the Yahoo! Search app for iOS and Android.”

    Yahoo Browser Plus also bit the dust on June 28th, and Yahoo now refers users to these developer offerings.

    Also gone as of June 28th, is Citizen Sports. Yahoo just wants to stick with Yahoo Sports now.

    On June 30th, Yahoo WebPlayer ceased to work. Users will continue to be able to play media files using native browser support.

    Today, FoxyTunes and Yahoo RSS Alerts go away. Yahoo instead directs users to Yahoo Music and Keyword News alerts in Yahoo Alerts (by email).

    On July 8th, Yahoo is killing Yahoo Neighbors (beta) and AltaVista (yep, that’s a big one, but when was the last time you used it?). Yahoo directs us to Yahoo Local Search and Yahoo Search respectively.

    On July 25th, you can say goodbye to Yahoo Stars india (in favor of Yahoo India OMG!) and on July 31st ,Yahoo Downloads (beta) will no longer support third-party downloads. It will, however, continue to offer downloads of Yahoo products like Yahoo Toolbar and Yahoo Messenger.

    Finally, on September 28th, the Yahoo Local API and Yahoo Term Extraction API will be no more.

    More on all of these product shut-downs here.

  • FTC Updates Search Engine Ad Disclosure Guidelines

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has updated is guidance to the search engine industry regarding the need to distinguish between advertisements and search results.

    Search industry veteran Danny Sullivan wrote a letter to the FTC just over a year ago calling upon the commission to scrutinize Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask, Nextag, Twenga and TripAdvisor, with regards to the disclosure of paid listings. It’s unclear whether today’s update comes as a result of Sullivan’s letter, but it seems pretty likely.

    The FTC has sent letters to search engine companies noting that in recent years, paid search results have “become less distinguishable as advertising”. The commission said in an announcement:

    The letters are the latest example of the FTC’s work to update its guidance for digital advertisers, which also includes recent updates to the Dot Com Disclosures and Endorsements and Testimonials Guides. The letters also respond to requests from industry and consumer organizations to update the 2002 guidance.

    According to both the FTC staff’s original search engine guidance and the updated guidance, failing to clearly and prominently distinguish advertising from natural search results could be a deceptive practice. The updated guidance emphasizes the need for visual cues, labels, or other techniques to effectively distinguish advertisements, in order to avoid misleading consumers, and it makes recommendations for ensuring that disclosures commonly used to identify advertising are noticeable and understandable to consumers.

    The letters note that the principles of the original guidance still apply, even as search and the business of search continue to evolve. The letters observe that social media, mobile apps, voice assistants on mobile devices, and specialized search results that are integrated into general search results offer consumers new ways of getting information. The guidance advises that regardless of the precise form that search takes now or in the future, paid search results and other forms of advertising should be clearly distinguishable from natural search results.

    The guidance has been directed at AOL, Ask, Bing, Blekko, DuckDuckGo, Google, Yahoo and seventeen other specialty search engines.

    You can see the actual letter here (pdf).

    [via Danny Sullivan]

  • Yandex Announces Homepage Redesign

    Yandex Announces Homepage Redesign

    Russian search leader Yandex announced a redesign of its homepage today. The goal, according to the company, was to make the most relevant information more visible and more easily accessible.

    The page is less cluttered than previous versions (you can see them all here), and has less text. They’ve replaced images with blocks of text, and placed related items together. News from big media outlets, for example, are now placed with news from blogs.

    “We have moved the most popular services to a more visible position and our specialist services went to the background – for example, Yandex.Mail is now in a more prominent spot, while Yandex.Direct and Yandex.Metrica have moved down to the bottom of the page,” the company explains. “The Yandex.Maps feature has been expanded, so that users can now find the nearest pharmacy or cafe with one click, along with taxis, public transport routes and panoramas. As a result, the homepage is both simpler and more functional.”

    According to Yandex, the new page is up to 50% faster than the previous one.

    “Yandex is both a search engine and the gateway to the internet for millions of people,” said Vera Leyzerovich, head of desktop and mobile products at Yandex. “On the homepage, besides the search bar, users are accustomed to seeing information that they need every day – news, weather, exchange rates, the traffic situation. But the more data it includes, the harder it is to navigate. On the new version, we have retained the emphasis on search and kept the page informative and familiar for its users, but at the same time we have made it clear and uncluttered, so people will enjoy visiting it again and again.”

    A report came out earlier this year that Yandex had surpassed Bing in search queries.

  • Bing Tests Weird Competitor Links Under Google Search Result

    Well, this is interesting. Bing ran a test, placing links to Facebook, Craigslist and eBay underneath its result for google.com when the user searched “google”.

    Matt McGee at Search Engine Land noticed what he thought was a bug, until he received confirmation from Bing that it was actually a test (which has since ended, apparently).

    Regularly, if you search “google” on Bing, the top result will look something like this:

    Bing's Google Deeplinks

    You’ll get Deep Links (Bing’s version of what Google calls Sitelinks) for Gmail, Images, Maps, News, Videos, Translate, Documents, and Finance. In other words, you get links to various Google services, which makes sense. You also get an actual Google search box.

    In the experiment, however, users would see half of the Google deep links, and the other half would be for things like “Go to Facebook, Go to YouTube, Go to Craigslist, and Go to eBay. Well, YouTube is still a Google service, but why in the world would someone searching for “google” want any of these?

    McGee has a screen cap:

    Google results on Bing

    Essentially, Bing was sending users to Google competitors. You may not always consider sites like Facebook Craigslist or eBay competitors to Google, but Google has a social media service, and it has a shopping service. At some level, Google competes with all of these sites.

    I’m surprised they didn’t just put a “Go to Bing.com” link there, or even a “Go to Yahoo.com” link. At least you can still access Bing results from Facebook.

    McGee posted a Q&A with Bing about the test. He asked how Bing would respond if a search for “bing” on Google included Sitelinks to Twitter, Amazon or Kayak. Bing’s response was, “We appreciate all customer-focused innovation.”

    Something tells me Bing would throw a fit if Google did that. Perhaps it would even get another anti-Google campaign from the company. It’s been over a month since they started one.

  • Blekko Makes “Donation” Of Search Data To Common Crawl

    Alternative search engine blekko announced today that it is “donating” 22 billion pages’ metadata to Common Crawl, a non-profit foundation, which maintains an open crawl of the web for access and analysis by anyone who cares.

    “The holiday season is in full swing and blekko is getting into the giving spirit – donating metadata on search engine ranking for 140 million websites and 22 billion webpages to Common Crawl,” a spokesperson for blekko tells WebProNews.

    “With this donation of spam-filtered metadata, blekko is helping Common Crawl ensure that their resources and man-hours are spent crawling real, useful webpages,” he adds.

    Blekko says that web and search being open and transparent is “number one on the blekko bill of rights.” Yes, blekko has a bill of rights:

    Blekko bill of rights

    Through blekko’s API, blekko says Common Crawl will have access to the metadata from 140 million websites.

    More about the initiative on blekko’s blog.

  • U.S. November Search Engine Rankings: Google And Microsoft Up, Yahoo Down

    comScore has put out its monthly search engine rankings for the United States, looking at the month of November. Google sites made up 67% of explicit core search queries conducted, up 0.1% from October, according to the firm. Explicit core search excludes contextually driven searches that don’t reflect specific user intent to interact with search results.

    Microsoft sites were up 0.2% at 16.2% of queries, and Yahoo sites were down 0.1% at 12.1%. Ask Network was behind Yahoo with 3% of queries (down 0.2%), and AOL followed with 1.7% (down 0.1%).

    Search Engine Rankings in Novmeber

    There were about 17 billion explicit core searches performed in November, according to comScore. Google sites accounted for 11.4 billion of them. Microsoft sites accounted for 2.7 billion searches, and Yahoo accounted for 2.1 billion. Ask had 506 million, and AOL had 297 million. Again, this is just the U.S.

    comScore November Search

    Of course, Yahoo is actually powered by Microsoft’s Bing. comScore says that in November, 69.4% of searches carried organic search results from Google, while 25.4% of searches were powered by Bing (up 0.4 percentage points).

  • Blekko Launches New Suite Of SEO Tools

    Blekko announced the launch of a new suite of premium SEO tools today. The suite features a re-designed user interface, and a number of new features.

    The suite includes page analysis, SEO report cards, inbound links organized by categories, Blekko crawler sections reports and domain reports, instant SEO data and direct SEO access from Blekko’s search engine, AdSense and IP hosting information, a full list of pages crawled, and PageSource and Cache.

    It also includes full link reports of the following types: inbound links by host, live inbound links, all inbound links from a host, all inbound links to a specific URL, outbound links fro a page URL, internal links, and domain comparison of inbound links.

    “The mission behind blekko has always be to offer full transparency on the web,” said Blekko CEO Rich Skrenta. “Blekko’s premium SEO tools gives developers unique and often privately kept data about web domain content. Unlike other search engine analytic tools which only show general data oninbound links, our premium SEO tools provide full data reports that can be used to compare SEO stats between sites and direct SEO access from blekko search result pages.”

    Blekko says it is able to provide its “up-to-the-minute” SEO tools because it is only one of four companies that can index the entire web. Blekko performs 120 million searches per month through 20 billion pages indexed. Over a hundred million of these are updated daily, Blekko says.

  • SEMPO Urges FTC To Review Search Labeling Transparency

    SEMPO Urges FTC To Review Search Labeling Transparency

    The SEMPO (Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization) Board of Directors has sent a letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz regarding search labeling transparency.

    The theme of the letter is in line with the open letter written to the Commission by search industry vet Danny Sullivan earlier this year, in which he called for the FTC to scrutinize Google as well its competitors when it comes to labeling search results that have been paid for.

    “Should the FTC undertake such a review, in addition to signifying the understanding that recent extreme antitrust claims against Google search practices lack merit, it would also be taken to mean that the FTC perceives the benefits of taking a broader, industry-wide approach to search labeling and transparency – a positive position,” SEMPO says.

    SEMPO has spoken out against FTC regulation of Google in the past. See our interview with Chairman Chris Boggs here.

    “As we have publicly stated previously, the search function is not a government-run utility, established by law and thus subject to bureaucratic oversight, but a service provided to consumers and businesses by private companies, which have set up their operations using their own principles, proprietary technologies and algorithms. We feel strongly, for a host of reasons, that regulating individual companies’ search algorithms is undesirable,” the letter continues.

    “Nonetheless, we believe that a level playing field should be ensured for search as a whole – both for the protection of consumers and in furtherance of fair competition within the search industry,” it adds. “Consumers and search engines are both better off when consumers have full transparency about why they are seeing which results on search websites. If the present FTC guidelines on paid placements are being widely flouted, or if certain industry segments – such as vertical search sites – harbor particular practices that mislead consumers, result in fraud, or offer unfair competitive advantage to their commercial customers, the public and the business community deserve to know. And they also deserve to have steps taken to protect them in future.”

    Here’s the letter in its entirety:

    Letter to FTC Chairman Leibowitz 10-15-2012

    Google has come out in support of such an industry wide review by the FTC. In July, a Google spokesperson told WebProNews, “Consumers benefit from clear labeling in search results, and we have always clearly disclosed which links are paid advertisements. That said, not all search engines clearly disclose paid results, so we would support a fresh look by the FTC at search labeling and transparency practices.”

    We also asked other companies like Microsoft, Orbitz and Expedia whether they would support such a review. None of them would comment at the time.

    Google, of course, is facing another kind of scrutiny by the FTC. Recent reports indicate that the Commission will come to a final decision on whether or not to pursue a suit against Google by mid November or December, with a reported four out of five Commissioners supporting a suit. Meanwhile, at least one congressman has written to the FTC saying that even discussing antitrust when it comes to Google “defies all logic”.

  • September U.S. Search Market: Google Up, Microsoft Flat, Yahoo Down

    comScore has released its latest numbers for the U.S. search market. They show Google sites up 0.3% in September at 66.7%, followed by Microsoft sites at 15.9% and Yahoo sites at 12.2%. Ask came in at 3.5%, and AOL came in at 1.8%. Microsoft remained flat from month to month, while Yahoo dropped by .6%.

    “More than 16.3 billion explicit core searches were conducted in September, with Google Sites ranking first with 10.9 billion,” reports comScore. “Microsoft Sites ranked second with 2.6 billion searches, followed by Yahoo! Sites with 2 billion, Ask Network with 565 million (up 3 percent) and AOL, Inc. with 287 million.”

    “In September, 69.4 percent of searches carried organic search results from Google (up 0.6 percentage points), while 25.1 percent of searches were powered by Bing,” the firm notes.

    Here are the usual charts:

    comScore search market in U.S.

    comScore search market

    In August, Bing had gained market share and Google had lost a bit.

  • Porn Search Engine Search.xxx Launches to Make .xxx Browsing Safer

    If your daily porn searches have led you to some of the more sketchy, unsafe places on the internet, a new search engine may be of interest to you. It’s called Search.xxx, and it’s the world’s first comprehensive search engine for all the .xxx domain porn sites out there.

    We first told you about search.xxx when it was still in development, back in June of 2011. At that time, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) had just approved the .xxx top-level domain in a highly-contested split vote. The .xxx domain had been fought by conservative groups like the Family Research Council and by the porn industry itself at first. But when it was finally approved, registry operator ICM Registry won the opportunity to manage it.

    And now it’s ICM Registry who has just unveiled the new porn-only search engine. Search.xxx promises that it’s safe and optimized for mobile. In fact, all of the .xxx sites crawled by the engine are scanned every day for malware, using McAfee software. Search.xxx is also available in 20 languages and customizable based on sexual orientation.

    Search.xxx does not list traditional .com porn sites, only .xxx sites, which first went live back in December of 2011. So you won’t be seeing any links to YouPorn or PornHub on this search engine.

    Upon review, the search engine works as expected, with searches generating only .xxx links. Users can change the language and sexual orientation preferences from the SERPs, which also include a “quick search” feature featuring popular porn terms that you may be familiar with.

    When the engine was first announced, ICM Registry President Stuart Lawley mentioned ads and sponsorships. There are currently no ads on search.xxx – either traditional or within the results (at least they aren’t clearly marked). Of course, that could change with time, as the engine was just unsheathed.

    So, why do we need a special search engine for .xxx domains? ICM thinks that the exclusivity and safety is a big draw. Of course, adult site searchers can’t always rely on engines like Google or Bing to provide the results they want – as those sites’ relationship with porn is tenuous, at best. Search.xxx, on the other hand, is definitely tailored to its crowd.

    “While some search engines reportedly de-rank adult sites in order to filter adult content out of regular searches, our new search engine helps consumers accurately find and enjoy all manner of porn – because it searches only .XXX domain-based porn,” said ICM.

    The new search engine is just barely off the ground, but will undoubtedly become more relevant as .xxx domains continue to pop up on the internet.

    [via PCMag]

  • News Corp. Publications To Unblock Search Engines

    Back in 2009, news came out that News Corp. would block search engines from some of its content, such as that from The Times and The Sunday Times. Now, it seems News Corp. has had a change of heart. Kind of.

    According to The Telegraph, content from these publications will begin appearing in Google results next month. However, it won’t just be showing full content to searchers. According to PaidContent, it will just show the first two sentence to search engines, and the rest will remain behind a paywall. Robert Andrews reports:

    The limited free preview does not alter News International’s belief that it should continue charging for The Times (visitors will be invited to subscribe to read full articles). But it does suggest that, having signed up 130,751 digital subscribers since mid-2010, the publisher is having to look in new places to maintain customer acquisition momentum.

    The whole thing shows that despite News Corp. head Rupert Murdoch’s classic argument about Google being a “thief” or “pirate,” search engines clearly provide a valuable resource to publishers. Even if these publications aren’t making their entire contents indexable (which would almost certainly lead to more links and increased exposure), it shows they do have some amount of dependence on search traffic. It will be interesting to see how only giving users the first two sentences helps the sign-up numbers.

  • Search Engines Remember 9/11 On Homepages

    The major search engines are remembering 9/11 today on the tragedy’s 11th anniversary. Google has not put together an elaborate doodle or anything (they usually stick to more upbeat events for that), but is displaying a tasteful black ribbon underneath the search box.

    Bing has a much more visual display:

    Bing 9/11 Page

    Frankly, the image above doesn’t really do it justice. If you go to the site, you can see the water moving and whatnot.

    Yahoo is simply displaying a related story as its main news story:

    Yahoo on 9/11

    Ask is displaying a September 11th Memorial trivia question:

    Ask 9/11

    There don’t appear to be any changes to the homepages of alternative search engines Blekko or DuckDuckGo.

  • Is DuckDuckGo Gaining Ground on Google?

    Is DuckDuckGo Gaining Ground on Google?

    In recent years, the search industry has not changed a lot in terms of large players. Google has maintained the leader position with its ownership of nearly 70 percent of search market share. The #2 and #3 spots have changed slightly after the Microsoft-Yahoo Search Alliance in 2009. According to the most recent Experian-Hitwise statistics, Bing-powered search has risen to 30 percent.

    Hitwise April Search Market Share Report

    In 2010, Ask exited the search business to focus its efforts on a Q/A service and mobile endeavors. Also in 2010, Blekko launched with the goal of becoming the “#3 search engine” by tackling the growing problem of spam with its slashtag technology approach.

    Other than these events, the search player side of the industry has been relatively quiet. There is, however, current talk of Yahoo re-entering the search market and pulling out of its 10-year search deal with Microsoft. This week, the company introduced Yahoo Axis, which could be its first move in this direction.

    Still, there is one more player that we have yet to mention – DuckDuckGo. This search engine launched quietly in 2008 and has stayed somewhat low on the radar until recently. It is getting a lot of attention now though for the bold position it is taking on major issues.

    Gabriel Weinberg, Founder of DuckDuckGo When we talked with the search engine’s founder Gabriel Weinberg last year, he told us that DuckDuckGo was focused on building a search alternative to Google. The search engine separates itself from other search engines through its Zero-Click Info feature that provides instant answers to search queries, its user experience that is free of both spam and clutter, and its privacy protections for users.

    Over the past year, DuckDuckGo has ramped up its efforts in each of these areas, and as a result, users are noticing. In a recent conversation with Weinberg, he tells us that DuckDuckGo receives just under 50 million search queries a month, which translates into about 1.5 million each day. In other words, the search engine has more than doubled its traffic.

    “We’ve grown gradually since the beginning, but we had a major uptick at the beginning of the year when we launched a visual redesign,” said Weinberg.

    He explained that DuckDuckGo made around 100 changes that it rolled out in that redesign. More recently, the search engine announced an effort that encourages developers to add instant answer plugins to DuckDuckGo. The initiative is called DuckDuckHack and is geared toward making the search experience faster and more relevant.

    DuckDuckHack Example

    Local, mobile, and social are also just as important to DuckDuckGo as they are to other search engines. Instead of viewing them as individual products, however, it uses an “umbrella approach” for them. In other words, all these areas are incorporated into finding the best search results.

    “Instead of tailoring results to you personally,” says Weinberg, “we, instead, return results that are generally known to be good.”

    Ultimately, DuckDuckGo is trying to improve in all the areas that Google seems to be lacking in. For instance, Google has had many struggles regarding content farms and spam in the past couple of years. Although it has attempted to address these issues with the ongoing Panda updates, some people, including Weinberg, believe the problems still exist.

    “A lot of it seems opaque to me,” said Weinberg. “I’m sure there’s a ton of changes, but I still see a lot of the same kind of, what I consider, content farms on Google.”

    The privacy issues against Google continue to build as well. The search giant has received scrutiny from both the U.S. and Europe, and after releasing its new privacy policy earlier this year, it has gotten even more criticism.

    For DuckDuckGo, this turn of events creates an opportunity. As users become more dissatisfied with Google, Weinberg is hoping that they’ll look to his search engine as an alternative.

    “We’re making the case that there are certainly some users who would prefer to be tracked a lot less,” he said. “I really think there is a percentage who prefer alternative experiences.”

    The irony in all this is that DuckDuckGo makes money the same way that Google does – through advertising based on search queries. But, “you don’t have to track users to do that,” Weinberg says.

    “The problem is that they want to serve better ads across their sites where you don’t have that search query to serve an ad against,” he further explained.

    While it is possible that DuckDuckGo could begin to pull away some of Google’s search market share, Weinberg tell us that DuckDuckGo has no desire to become a big corporation. Web search is the company’s #1 priority at this point, and he intends to keep it that way.

    “Our goal really is just to build a nice alternative search engine that… a decent percentage of people would prefer as their search engine of choice,” he said.

  • Yahoo! Sinks as Google and Bing Rise

    Yahoo! Sinks as Google and Bing Rise

    The comScore search engine data for April isn’t out until tomorrow, but Search Engine Land has an unnamed source that has given them a rundown of the numbers. The story they tell is one we saw unfolding as far back as March. That is, both Google and Bing are rising in search market share, while search traffic for Yahoo! is decreasing.

    In April 2012, Yahoo! had 13.5% of the search market pie, down from 15.9% in April 2011. That 2.4% loss went straight to Bing and Google. Bing is up 1.3% since last April and Google is up 1.1%. Though Yahoo! and Bing could be considered one search engine, since Bing now powers Yahoo! search, the sum of their shares doesn’t even add up to half of Google’s dominant 66.5% share of the market.

    This is more bad news for Yahoo!, which has had quite a bit of bad news lately. With its CEO under fire for (whether he knew it or not) falsifying his resume, Yahoo! needs more than huge layoffs to begin to compete as more than an entertainment news page. As Google and Bing slowly eat away at the remnants of Yahoo!’s search share, it remains to be seen whether any other competitors, such as Facebook, can enter the market and make it more than a two-horse race. Perhaps Bing’s new search results system and layout will help entice those users leaving Yahoo! Microsoft is banking on improved social search to be the feature that differentiates it from Google.

    What do you think? Should Yahoo! abandon search altogether? Will the new Bing have what it takes to make a dent in Google’s lead? Leave a comment below and let us know.

  • Experimental Search Engine Removes Top Million Sites From Your Results

    Do you ever feel the search results that Google yields are too mainstream? Are you looking to explore the cavernous, cobweb-laden outer reaches of the interwebs? If you want to spend some time on some deep discovery, Million Short might be your ticket.

    Million Short’s name says it all. It’s a search engine that brings back results that are a million sites short of what you’d find in Google. You can chose to remove the top million, hundred thousand, ten thousand, and on down to just one hundred from your results.

    Million Short is an experimental web search engine (really, more of a discovery engine) that allows you to REMOVE the top million (or top 100k, 10k, 1k, 100) sites from the results set. We thought might be somewhat interesting to see what we’d find if we just removed an entire slice of the web.

    The thinking was the same popular sites (we’re not saying popular equals irrelevant) show up again and again, Million Short makes it easy to discover sites that just don’t make it to the top of the search engine results for whatever reason (poor SEO, new site, small marketing budget, competitive keyword(s) etc.). Most people don’t look beyond page 1 when doing a search and now they don’t have to.

    For instance, let’s say that I used Million Short to search “Hipster.” Gone are results from Wikpedia, Urban dictionary, WikiHow, KnowYourMeme, and even latfh.com (Look at that F*cking Hipster, a popular blog). What it has returned are various sites that I didn’t see even on the 5th page of Google search results (and I didn’t dare go past that). The lone exception was HipsterHandbook, which appeared on the 1st page of both engines.

    In theory, Million Short is helping you discover stuff that you would never ever see using Google or even Bing or Yahoo!. It’s stuff that would be buried under hundreds of pages of search results. Let’s look at another example, a search for “The Beatles.”

    Million Short failed to remove the top search result from a Google search of “The Beatles,” which was thebeatles.com. But everything that follows are deeper sites. Million Short removed (once again) Wikipedia, last.fm, mtv.com, apple.com, amazon.com and a multitude of lyrics and guitar tabs sites from my results.

    One result I stumbled upon was from a site called suckmybeatles.com, and it’s basically a guy who really thinks The Beatles blow who posts blog entries and funny pictures detailing this (unpopular) opinion. That was well worth my time, so I guess score one for Million Short.

    Million Short was brought to my attention via reddit, so let’s take a look at some of the reviews from the community (which are mixed).

    Oddgenetix writes:

    I just had a very rewarding experience with this thing. I searched my own name, and through pure serendipity the first result was an artist, with the same name as I. The art he paints is 50’s-60’s pin-up (the old-style classy kind, not the desperate new variety that melded with rockabilly, retro, and reality-tv-tattoo-culture.) Also really sweet looking vintage car ads for cars he imagined, and propaganda-type posters. Shit is so awesome. I threw money at him and got a few paintings, which I will be hanging in my living room, because consequently the paintings are signed with my name and I’m a pretty good liar.
    TL;DR I searched my own name and found a same-name artist, so I bought his work and now I’m “a painter.”

    Bullshit? Maybe. Entirely plausible for this site? Definitely.

    Gsan writes:

    This is a nice technique. It’s like searching a whole other internet.
    Edit: this is real nice. Look at the sidebar of the sites it blocked, and tell me how many of those you think had what you were looking for? For me the side sites are mostly online stores, and cheap sites like ehow.com and about.com. Good riddance. Google and Bing seem to think I want to buy everything I’m searching for and they really want me to buy it at Amazon.

    DrizztDoUrden writes:

    This is actually pretty sweet. It reminds me of the gopher days when it was nearly impossible to get exactly what you wanted, but you would learn so much more from the journey.

    But FLEABttn writes:

    It’s like a search engine designed to find things I’m not looking for!

    And nkozyra writes:

    These results were shockingly terrible.

    Look, Million Short is obviously no Google killer. It’s not even a Yahoo killer. It’s an alternative search engine for people wanting a unique search experience. If you’re looking for popular, relevant information and you want it fast, it’s probably not the way to go. If you’re looking to find some random corners of the internet, it might tickle your fancy.

    Just be prepared to find stuff like this as your top result (h/t reddit). ಠ_ಠ

  • Google Isn’t as Privacy-Friendly as it Once Was

    When Google was first incorporated, their unofficial motto was “Don’t be evil”. And, for the most part, they stayed true to this philosophy. During the search engine’s leaner years, I used to sing its praises to anyone who would listen. “You’re using Yahoo?”, I’d say, flabbergasted and bug-eyed. Google, with its simplistic design and clutter-free layout, seemed like a natural choice for anyone that didn’t want to be bombarded with junk as they made their way around the virtual world.

    Unfortunately, as years went by and the company began to slowly expand its horizons, Google didn’t seem to be as privacy-friendly as it once was. Until I had an opportunity to glance over the image you see embedded below, I had no idea just how sneaky the search engine had become.

    Recently, Google was fined nearly $25,000 for its lack of transparency during an investigation into whether or not the company illegally collected information transmitted through unsecured wi-fi networks while doing work on their Street View product. That may sound like a lot of cash to you and I, but considering they sport a market capitalization of roughly $200 billion, that fine is nothing more than a drop in the proverbial bucket. The whole scenario disturbs me.

    In order to get back into everyone’s good graces, Google made some changes to their privacy policies. However, these alternations were still concerning to some.

    Below you can see a chart documenting Google’s slow descent into the unscrupulous world of information tracking, among other things. It also gives you some nifty information on how to keep them from secretly spying on your web habits. It’s kind of scary, especially from someone who has used the search engine for so long.

    So when your child asks you if he or she can trust Google, you should probably say “no”. Give them a cookie, a smile, and let them know that everything’s going to be all right.

  • Bateflix Is Netflix’s Porn Recommendation Engine

    Attention everybody who hasn’t discovered internet porn, or wants to see some nudity & sex in a real storytelling context (sorry, internet porn), some guy has created a search engine for all of the movies available via Netflix that contain the MPAA’s greatest enemy. The site is aptly titled “Bateflix” and says it will help you find “the best porn on Netflix.”

    According to Bateflix, they have 6,411 movies in the database. There are rated on a scale from X to XXX, depending on their level of sexual explicitness.

    Users can search the database by filtering for genre, category (or sexual activity), year, MPAA rating, user rating within Netflix, and of course DVD-vs-streaming availability. So, if I wanted a fantasy film from 2000-2009 featuring accidental nudity, I currently only have one option: The Piano Tower of Earthquakes, a Not-Rated 2006 film with a 2.8 average rating on Netflix. “After murdering an opera singer onstage, the sinister Dr. Droz absconds with her corpse and creates a performance starring her reanimated body,” says the synopsis. In this case, I’m probably better off taking my chances on the interwebs.

    But if I generalize my search to any film available through Netflix instant with a threesome – I get a lot more options. This is just the XXX categorized results:

    (image)

    After you find what you’re looking for, you can even write a nudity review. Bateflix also features a random movie generator, if you’re not being too picky.

    Of course, using a Netflix search as a porn search has its problems. For one, watching an entire movie like “Black Snake Moan” for the nudity/sex is like reading Catcher In The Rye to hear someone say some bad words. There are definitely better options. Plus, a random search just pulled up films like 4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days as well as Irreversible – both of which contain nudity, but calling it “porn” might be a little strange for some people.

    Then again, if you have to watch a movie with your parents, you could use Bateflix to screen out the ones that might make things a bit uncomfortable.

    Oh well, let’s just file it under the “so that exists” department and move on.

  • Vint Cerf Believes Google Could be Toppled

    No, this is not an alarmist reaction to Google+ or anything like that. Instead, it’s an incredibly innovative person who understands there are future generations who could very well create something that succeeds Google’s position in the Internet industry.

    What we have is a Vint Cerf situation. That is, when he speaks, especially about the Internet, we listen, and listen closely. And when Cerf says he firmly believes there’s nothing to prevent the development of technology that could unseat Google, it’s worth noting.

    That’s what being one of the “Fathers of the Internet” brings you.

    While speaking at the Life Online exhibition, Cerf offered his view of a potential future Google faces, via Pocket-Lint.com:

    “There’s nothing to stop someone from developing better technology than we have and to invent something even more powerful and efficient and effective. Which, of course, scares us. And that’s good because it means we run as fast as we can to develop better tools for search in order to try to stay ahead of the game… We absolutely know that there could be somebody just like Larry and Sergey on some university campus with an idea we don’t have that could explode on the scene and take the business away.”

    Is that how Google will fall? Not from failed ventures into social media or anything Microsoft does, but from a younger generation of web developers who have the kind of vision required to develop something better than Google, while building it into the worldwide powerhouse? While it’s likely there are many who are hoping for Google’s demise sooner rather than later, especially in the wake of the Panda updates, is that a reasonable expectation to have?

    Even when Google fails–and there have been many–it still doesn’t impact their position as the lead search engine in the world. With that in mind, it’s pretty clear Cerf has mapped out the best way to topple Google: make something better than what they already offer. Are you up to the challenge?

  • Bing Search Quality Insights: New Blog Series Sheds Light On Bing’s Inner-Workings

    Google recently started a series of blog posts highlighting various points of progress it has made in its efforts to increase search quality. The results have essentially been lists of monthly changes Google has made to its algorithm and interface. This has been extremely interesting to watchers of the search industry and webmasters who are concerned with search engine optimization.

    Bing is now starting a similar series, though if the first entry is any indication, we’re going to see a much more in-depth explanation about things in general, as opposed to lists of specific tweaks.

    “Quality improvements in Bing are often subtle but often those little changes are the result of years of research,” says Dr. Harry Shum, Corporate Vice President of Bing R&D. “In the coming weeks and months, you will hear from members of my team on a range of topics, from the complexities of social search and disambiguating spelling errors to whole page relevance and making search more personal. We will also highlight the ideas and projects we have collaborated with colleagues from Microsoft Research and academia to advance the state of the art for our industry. We hope this will not only be useful information for our blog readers, but that they will spark conversations that help us all move the search industry forward.”

    The first entry comes from Jan Pedersen, Chief Scientist for Core Search at Bing, who talks about how Bing determines “whole page relevance,” which it uses to determine not just where to rank a result on the search results page, but whether to just return a link or an “answer”.

    “As with any relevance problem we start with the question of how to measure if Bing has done a good job,” explains Pedersen. “We could do this by simply asking human judges to compare the output of competing blending algorithms and assess which is better. This turns out to be a difficult judgment task that produces quite noisy and unreliable results. Instead we look at how people behave on Bing in the real world. Based on how they respond to changes we make an assumption that a better blending algorithm will move people’s clicks towards the top of the page. This turns out to be the same as saying that a block of content, or answer, is well placed if it receives at least as many clicks as the equivalently sized block of content below it — or, as we say internally, if its win rate is greater than 0.5. So a good blending algorithm will promote an answer on the page upward as long as its win rate is greater than 0.5. Armed with this metric, we can run online experiments and compare the results of competing blending algorithms giving us a realistic data set.”

    Shum did note in a blog post announcing the new blog series that Bing does measure search quality with a mix of offline human judges (presumably similar to Google’s raters) and online user engagement.

    “Next we investigate the available inputs into an online blending function that improves this metric,” continues Pedersen. “We can, and do, use historical anonymous click data, but this is not sufficient because it does not generalize to rare queries, or to new content with no history. So, we add in three kinds of additional inputs: confidence scores from the answer provider, query characterizations, and features extracted from other answers and web pages that will be shown on the page. For example, to learn where to place an image answer in the search results for a given query, we consider the confidence score returned from the image search provider, the ranking scores of nearby Web pages, and whether the query is marked as referring to the sort of entities that are well described by images (people, places, etc.).”

    Bing actually uses over a thousand signals for blending search functions, according to Pedersen. This is in line with what Bing’s Duane Forrester has said in the past – roughly a thousand signals.

    “Finally, we consider the offline and online infrastructure that will be used to create and run a blending function,” adds Pedersen. “We use a very robust, but high-performance learning method, called boosted regression trees, to automatically produce a ranking function given training data. This allows us to use many signals with the confidence that each additional signal will incrementally improve our blending function. Our training sets are fairly large, since they are mined from our billions of anonymous query session logs, so we use our large-scale data mining infrastructure, called Cosmos, to prepare the data and run offline experiments. Once a new blending function has been generated by our offline learning method, it is deployed to a serving component internally called APlus that puts all that data into action and runs after all candidate content blocks that have been generated, where it can be tested via online experimentation and finally placed into production.”

    Pedersen says Bing has been focusing on applying all of this to new inputs for “temporarily relevant” answers. Think news stories that die down after a while.

    If you’re really into learning about the inner-workings of search engines, it’s a pretty interesting read, and is frankly not he kind of thing we see from Bing very often. It looks like that’s changing now.

    There’s not much here in terms of SEO guidance, at least in the first post, but SEO enthusiasts will no doubt want to keep an eye on the series and stay on the lookout for info and tips that could be applied to SEO strategies. Google’s change lists are a bit more useful in this regard.

  • Yandex Gets Twitter Access, Launches Social Features. Should Google Worry?

    Yandex, the Russian search engine giant, announced a new social networking search program.

    The announcement doesn’t mention Twitter specifically, but Search Engine Land is reporting that the search engine has made a deal with Twitter to gain access to the Twitter Firehose. Little has been said about how Yandex will actually used this, but reporter Greg Sterling says, Yandex “has discretion over what it uses and how that content is ranked and displayed.”

    You may recall that last year, Google’s deal with Twitter for that same access expired, and the two companies failed to reach an agreement to extend it. This led to the disappearance of Google’s Realtime Search feature, making Google less useful for some searches.

    Google would later go on to release “Search Plus Your World,” favoring Google+ connections in search results, and souring the relationship between the two companies further.

    Bing has access to Twitter (and Facebook), and some have expressed intent to actually switch search engines over the whole thing. Could Yandex become a more significant global competitor with some more expansion? Beyond Russia, Yandex has sites in Turkey, Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan.

    Yandex’s new offerings include the roll out of a beta version of a “people finder” for its Russian site. Users can view all public profiles of a person with accounts on sites like VKontakte, Facebook, LiveJournal, and Odnoklassniki (popular services in that country).

    “It is so much more convenient to see multiple profiles of the same person grouped together,” says Yandex Product Manager Alexander Chubinskiy. “Yandex does this grouping with care — only those profiles that refer to one another get grouped. Web users can choose if they want their profiles on different websites to appear in search results separately, or as grouped together. So, if one of your personal profiles refers to others, the icons of those websites on which they are hosted will appear on the same thumbnail. Conversely, the user can remove cross-reference from their personal pages so that each of the profiles appears in Yandex’s search results independently.”

    Yandex claims about 61% of Russia’s search market share and 45 million monthly visitors to its Russian search engine.

    The company says it processes over two million people searches daily. About half of them, it says, are to find information about celebrities, while the other half ask about someone’s friend, a contact, an employee or a partner.