WebProNews

Tag: Sarah Palin

  • ‘Iron Sky’ Opening Sequence Now Online For All Your Sci-Fi Needs

    For those of you that have yet to get a whiff of the fresh-baked amazing that is Iron Sky, here’s what you need to know: moon Nazis, invasions, outer space, President not-Sarah Palin, awesome special effects, spectacular sense of tongue-in-cheek humor, and the most Nazi-punching action fun this side of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

    The movie just premiered at SXSW and will soon have a schedule of release dates for the month of April in the United States. If you want to request Iron Sky to screen somewhere in your neck of the woods, you can go to the official website and use their clever Google Maps tool to put in your request for Iron Sky.

    Before you jaunt off to do that, though, check out the first four minutes of the film, provided by JoBlo.com. If the opening credits sequence is any indication, this movie will be a goldmine of win.

  • Game Change, Sarah Palin Campaign Biopic Receives Rave Reviews

    If you pay for HBO, then you were able to take in one of the most controversial movies released so far in 2012 – “Game Change“. The movie starring Julianne Moore as Sarah Palin looks back to 2008, during the greatest media zeitgeist we’ve seen in terms of presidential campaigns. One of its most important characters is featured in the movie, which most critics are lauding as real, emotional, and well acted by everyone involved.

    Game Change Sarah Palin and John McCain

    When you release a movie like this, it’s most important that your characters feel real and not overly hammed up. According Roger Ebert of The Chicago Sun-Times, Julianne Moore was great, “In her performance, Julianne Moore doesn’t do an impersonation of Palin here, in the sense that Meryl Streep was uncanny in her resemblance to Margaret Thatcher in “The Iron Lady.” She looks about as much like Palin as she can, but that’s not the point. She conveys the essence. In a way, she’s unprotected. Not a hardened, cynical politician, but a woman who has gone through life expecting good things and usually found them.

    Along with strong performances, a politically charged movie such as this needs to be fair and not feel as though it’s simply lambasting a single idea or person. One IMDB review seems to think everyone’s political views will determine how they view the movie, “Liberals will see this as a confirmation of their most deeply held convictions about Sarah Palin; her supporters will see it as a typical attack of the mainstream media on a particularly outspoken representative of American patriotism. Most of those in the middle will view it as an interesting exploration of the process of picking and managing a Vice Presidential candidate during an unusually intense campaign.”

    Twitter has let their reactions be known, and like anything politically charged, appears to be divided…

    Why was Sarah Palin’s movie, Game Change, released this month? An insult! She takes #women where we were 25 yrs. ago. #wiw12 #Hollywood 3 minutes ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Like the films Recount and The Special Relationship before it, Game Change reminds us once again how in the tank HBO is for the Democrats. 4 minutes ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Watched HBO’s ‘Game Change’ over the weekend. Thought it was phenomenal. 6 minutes ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Just watched “Game Change”. I didn’t know Sarah Palin didnt know that much on foreign affairs. I’m Thai and even I can identify the wars. 1 minute ago via Twitter for iPhone ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    ‘Game Change’ Tries to Rewrite Palin and Fails | AMAC, Inc. http://t.co/gEJOMcFw 1 minute ago via Facebook ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    'Game Change’: Could Sarah Palin portrayal affect the 2012 election? 2 minutes ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Interestingly enough, Sarah Palin herself says she won’t be watching the film. Though if you believe certain aspects of the movie, she will watch it and is personally hurt by the way much of the media portrays her. McCain has also spoken out against the movie, saying it’s based on a book completely without factual basis or actual quotes.

    While the candidates who are portrayed in the movie won’t be viewing it, the campaign managers involved have seen it and both have said it’s mostly accurate. So take all of those reactions for what you will.

    If you’re interested in the movie, but are still deciding whether or not to view it, enjoy the trailer below. If you have seen it, let us know what you thought of it in the comments.

  • ‘Iron Sky’ Pits President Sarah Palin Against Nazi Invaders From Space [Updated]

    UPDATE: Per a comment from one of the co-producers with “Iron Sky,” it looks like American movie-goers will get to enjoy this flick after all. As Mark Overett stated in his comment, “Iron Sky is definitely coming to the USA! Not only is it getting released to a cinema near you in April, Iron Sky has also been selected for SXSW Festival, Austin, Texas, with screenings and seminar 10-14th March. “We come in Peace”. Mark Overett, Australian Co-Producer, Iron Sky.”

    So there you go. And honestly, this is probably going to be more fun than any offering from George Lucas in the past thirty years, so start planning now, America.

    A very peculiar sci-fi movie called “Iron Sky” is making its way through the circuit of film festivals in Europe this season, yet it is conspicuously not coming anywhere near the United States. The flick is replete with great stuff Americans love to watch: spaceships, fighting Nazis, fighting Nazi invaders from space, Jerry Bruckheimer-levels of explosions, a campy yet potent sense of dark humor and… President Sarah Palin?

    Oh. Now it all makes sense why it’s staying away from the U.S. Well, sort of.

    In the film, the President of the United States is female, does adorn a certain someone’s signature red dress suit, sports a very familiar hairdo-and-glasses combo, and has the initials S.P. But it’s not a former governor of Alaska.

    Already, this movie sounds more like a fantasy horror than sci-fi comedy. At any rate, “Iron Sky” confidently offers something for everybody to either love or hate, which is all the makings of a summer blockbuster, right?

    The film, which is in English, depicts a fleet of Moon Nazis that intent on invading Earth so as to resume their mission of world domination. The last first and last line of defense for the United States of America, and the rest of the world, I fear, is the commander-in-chief of the United States, the aforementioned Palinesque Stephanie Paul.

    This movie is like a Choose Your Own Adventure book gone absolutely berserk on angel dust, but “Iron Sky” is surreal enough to entice just about anybody’s interest. Just try to watch the the trailer below without quietly craving more.

  • Viral Videos: (R) Gay Marriage Speech, Course of the Force, & Moon Nazis

    A viral video is one that becomes popular through the process of Internet sharing, via social media, sharing sites, or good ‘ole email. Everyday we highlight some of the best that are currently viral and some that are trending that way.

    Today’s videos feature a thin ice skating, a weatherman for the kids, and a Twisted f*****g Metal ad.

    No matter your stance on the debate, you have to hand it to Rep. Maureen Walsh (R). Not only did she go against the tide of her party affiliation, but she delivered the most personal, heartfelt, and powerful speech I’ve seen from a politician concerning the topic of gay marriage. With a small bit of humor as well.

    When you think of Star Wars nerds, the last thing you relate them to is an Olympic tradition. However, they’re stealing one to conduct a cool charitable event. May the force be with you…as you pass out from running 10 feet (hat tip to Triumph the Insult Comic Dog for the joke). If you want more details about the event, Zach Walton has a nice write-up

    Sarah Palin vs. Moon Nazis, these are the kind of ideas we need more of Hollywood.

    Hey there bud, you’re skating on…thin ice. (I’ll be here all evening, folks)

    One of those videos where you hate the guy in it for the first 20 seconds, then he starts to grow on you, then you laugh at his Snoop Dogg needs an umbrella for the drizzle joke at the end.

    So much going wrong in this video. First, the owner didn’t have the dog vaccinated for rabies and then you have a reporter getting directly in the face of a dog she doesn’t know. However, I love the look of reporters when they cut away from a segment that goes awkwardly wrong.

    She prefers the plastic worms used as lures on fishing poles to actual gummie worms. At least there’s no sugar rush.

    One of the greatest sounds you’ll ever hear in nature, sounds almost unnatural.

    This is Twisted Metal…you f***er (Warning: NSFW – language)

  • Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore Criticize Media Fascination with Palin Emails

    On Friday, a two-year-old request to release the emails of former VP candidate Sarah Palin while she was Governor of Alaska was finally granted. Many members of the mainstream media descended upon Juneau to collect the emails, which were distributed in hard-copy in 50 pound boxes.

    The idea was that the emails, sent from Palin’s Yahoo account during her tenure, might contain some interesting information. The thought makes sense, as the release of the emails was delayed for years following the initial request. State officials have also redacted many of the publicly released emails and held on to a couple thousand, prompting some to wonder what might be in the unseen portions of the trove.

    But as it turns out, the emails aren’t proving to be a source of any new, earth-shattering information about the former Governor. Even as many major news outlets crowdsourced the investigation of the emails, nobody has been able to find anything damning or really even remotely newsworthy.

    The only thing that has really made any sort of news, at least in the Twitter world was the headline that Palin writes emails at an 8th grade level. While quite easy to make a joke about that considering Palin’s history of sometimes perplexing answers to questions and her recent Paul Revere gaffe, it’s important to note that writing on an 8th grade reading level is actually pretty normal. Conciseness and brevity, both of which the analysts say Palin appears to have, can “lower” the reading level. In comparison, ‘The Gettysburg Address” was a 9.1 on the Flesch-Kincaid test and Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech scored only .6 higher than the Palin samples, at an 8.8.

    Two prominent Twitter users have come out against the media for their obsession with the Palin emails. Ashton Kutcher and wife Demi Moore have expressed their disdain for what Kutcher calls an “over reaching” media –

    As much as I’m not a fan of Sarah Palin I find sifting through her emails repulsive and over reaching media #palinemail 3 days ago via Flipboard · powered by @socialditto

    So agree! RT @aplusk: As much as I’m not a fan of Sarah Palin I find sifting through her emails repulsive & over reaching media #palinemail 2 days ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    The two celebrities aren’t the only ones to weigh in on the coverage of the emails, as Twitter has interesting comments from both sides of the aisle –

    Not sure what everyone was expecting from #Palin emails. Renewal of her Economist subscription? Love notes to McCain? #palinemail 1 hour ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    @mrskutcher @aplusk The merging of paparazzi tabloid mentality and politics #palinemail 18 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    But Weinergate is vital? RT @andilinks: Intense interest in #PalinEmail reveals the vapidity and shallowness of the left 3 days ago via Echofon · powered by @socialditto

    In my opinion, while it’s true that transparency in government is vital, this Palin thing does feel like an obsession with a celebrity rather than a real need to find important information.

    Let’s leave it with The Daily Show to do what it does best – sum everything up perfectly with comedy.

  • Sarah Palin’s Emails To Be Released

    Sarah Palin’s Emails To Be Released

    The long-delayed trove of digital correspondence between Sarah Palin and about fifty state officials will finally be released tomorrow. Many are anxious as to what might be revealed in the emails, while some believe that they probably won’t provide any new, earth-shattering information.

    The emails were requested by many journalists during the 2008 Presidential campaign, as Palin was obviously a big player as the Republican VP candidate. The release of the emails has been delayed on multiple occasions, with Alaska officials saying they didn’t have the proper technology to accommodate the requests.

    But in January, the Alaska attorney general directed that the emails should be released. And tomorrow, at 9am local time in the capital of Juneau, 24,199 emails will be made public. The emails will cover Palin’s time as Governor, spanning from the beginning of 2007 to September of 2008. Current Alaskan’s Governor Sean Parnell is keeping some 2,000 emails private.

    Many of the major news outlets will have people on the ground tomorrow to begin to go through and analyze the emails for possible stories. Two organizations are requesting the help of amateur journalists to comb through the massive cache.

    The Washington Post, on its blog The Fix, has a post today entitled “Help analyze the Palin emails.” They are limiting the participants to 100, who will be working in small teams to uncover any important information:

    That’s a lot of e-mail for us to review so we’re looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those e-mails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release.

    We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the e-mails. Participants can join from anywhere with a computer and an Internet connection.

    Here’s what their request form looks like:

    (image)

    The Washington Post has also set up a Twitter account simply for this purpose. @PalinEmails went live yesterday.

    Sign up to help reporters and @TheFix sift through #PalinEmails tomorrow. We’ve got just 100 spots. http://t.co/fqxYyx3(image) 4 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    The New York Times is also getting in on the fun, asking readers to help investigate the Palin emails on their politics blog The Caucus.

    We’re asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy e-mails, people and events that we may want to highlight. Interested users can fill out a simple form to describe the nature of the e-mail, and provide a name and e-mail address so we’ll know who should get the credit. Join us here on Friday afternoon and into the weekend to participate.

    If you requested copies of the Palin emails, they will cost you three cents a page. That adds up to $725.97. They will come in five 55 pound boxes.

    Palin herself has commented on the email release, saying that everything there is to know is probably already known. She does have some worries, as she told Fox News host Chris Wallace:

    “A lot of those e-mails obviously weren’t meant for public consumption,” she said, and people who read them will “never truly know what the context of each one of the e-mails was.”

    This story is bound to become pretty political, and fast. Judging by the comments over on Politico, there is plenty of opinions coming in from both sides regarding the release. Some say that this is an example of the liberal media continuing to hound someone they don’t like. Others say that a transparent government is essential to democracy, and if Palin has nothing to hide, she shouldn’t be worried.

    Thoughts?

  • Sarah Palin’s Paul Revere Comments Spark Wikipedia Battle

    A now famous video of former Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin discussing American History has sparked a battle on Wikipedia between those attempting to edit an article in order to reflect some suspect information.

    Palin has been on a bus tour that has drawn quite a bit of media attention. She has been visiting landmarks and historical sites all across America, hitting places like Gettysburg and the Liberty Bell. This tour has roused speculation that she may be gearing up for a Presidential run, but she has specifically said that it isn’t a campaign tour. She’s had this to say about her tour, according to Politico:

    This is a bus to be able to express to America how much we appreciate our foundation and to invite more people to be interested in all that is good about America and to remind ourselves we don’t need to fundamentally transform America, we need to restore what’s good about America.

    During a stop in Boston last week, an answer to a question about Paul Revere was captured on video. The video shows Palin giving a less-than-familiar history of his famous “Midnight Ride,” where he quote “warned the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms by ringin’ those bells.” Documented history and common knowledge of the event obviously tells of Revere warning Americans that the British were coming, and the ringing of bells haven’t traditionally been part of the warning.

    Check out the video below:

    It appears as though some people have decided to include Palin’s history of the Midnight Ride in the Wikipedia article about Paul Revere, and have been met with some resistance. On June 5th, one user added some content to the part of the article that concerns the midnight ride. Here’s a screencap from the old revision:

    The additions of the “one disputed account” suggesting that “Revere rang bells” looks to be a reference to Palin’s comments. As does the phrase beginning “most colonial residents at the time considered themselves British.” This would justify her claims that the British were warned.

    The revisions begun a war on Wikipedia amongst those who attempted to insert the new information and those who believe it has no place in the article. In the Wiki Talk section, there is a funny discussion entitled “Was Revere warning the British” and a topic has been opened and closed about the edit request.

    The AP clears up the history pretty well, stating that although Revere did talk to the British, it was far from giving them a message about taking away American arms. Plus the bell thing is highly suspect, according to a Revere biographer:

    The colonists at the time of Revere’s ride were British subjects, with American independence still in the future. But Revere’s own writing and other historical accounts leave little doubt that secrecy was vital to his mission.

    The Paul Revere House’s website says that on April 18, 1775, Dr. Joseph Warren, a patriot leader in the Boston area, instructed Revere to ride to Lexington, Mass., to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them.

    In an undated letter posted by the Massachusetts Historical Society, Revere later wrote of the need to keep his activities secret and his suspicion that a member of his tight circle of planners had become a British informant. According to the letter, believed to have been written around 1798, Revere did provide some details of the plan to the soldiers that night, but after he had notified other colonists and under questioning by the Redcoats.

    Intercepted and surrounded by British soldiers on his way from Lexington to Concord, Revere revealed “there would be five hundred Americans there in a short time, for I had alarmed the country all the way up,” he wrote.

    Revere was probably bluffing the soldiers about the size of any advancing militia, since he had no way of knowing, according to Joel J. Miller, author of “The Revolutionary Paul Revere.” And while he made bells, Revere would never have rung any on that famous night because the Redcoats were under orders to round up people just like him.

    “He was riding off as quickly and as quietly as possible,” Miller said. “Paul Revere did not want the Redcoats to know of his mission at all.”

    The interesting thing about Wikipedia is how it is always changing, modifying in real time to support an ever-changing world. That’s why Michael Jackson’s death can be part of his article seconds after it happens. But Wikipedia’s strength is also its weakness, as anyone can edit articles and change information. Wiki’s citation procedures eliminates most questionable information from the site, but there are always little tidbits that fall through the cracks.

    The Wikipedia consensus this time was that regarding the bells, Sarah Palin could not be cited as a reliable source.

  • Social Media and the Republican Hopefuls

    Newt Gingrich just announced via Facebook and Twitter that he will be making an announcement tonight on the Sean Hannity show on FOX news regarding his campaign to run for President.

    This announcement announcement is not the first we’ve seen so far as the cycle of republican presidential hopefuls gear up for primary season. Earlier, former Minnesota governor and hopeful Tim Pawlenty tweeted a link to an announcement he was making live on Facebook, which turned out to be the development of an exploratory committee on running for President. He has since thrown his hat in the ring officially.

    Be sure to watch Hannity this Wednesday at 9pm ET/8pm CT. I will be on to talk about my run for President of the United States @seanhannity 1 day ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Newt GingrichI have been humbled by all the encouragement you have given me to run. Thank you for your support. Be sure to watch Hannity this Wednesday at 9pm ET/8pm CT. I will be on to talk about my run for President of the United States.

    Mitt Romney, who is seen as the likely frontrunner early on in the primary race also kicked things off through social media. Back in April he announced his own exploratory committee for President on Twitter and also put out a short message on YouTube.

    Is it possible that whichever hopeful best utilizes social media will be the one to emerge victorious in the Republican primary? The Republican party should be praying that the most social media friendly candidate is the one that moves on to face President Obama in the national election. We all remember how well Barack Obama used Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to win his 2010 campaign. Just ask John McCain who, though active on Facebook and Twitter, looked like a Luddite in comparison to Obama’s media blitz.

    And Obama is still incredibly active on the social media sites, posting daily to his millions of followers. There is strong evidence to suggest that social media will heavily influence the outcome of the 2014 race.

    So that got me to thinking – how do the primary hopefuls stack up in terms of social media presence? I looked at Facebook statistics and used two different applications for determining Twitter influence (Klout and Twitalyzer). Klout factors in Facebook likes and comments into some of their ratings.

    Since Newt is in the news for just recently beginning to announce, let’s start with him.

    Newt has just shy of 126,000 likes on his official Facebook page. The page is active, meaning it has regular postings, photos and event notifications. The most recent 5 posts from Newt have an average of 846 likes and 144 comments.

    On Twitter, Newt has 1.3 million followers. He is also fairly active on the service, tweeting almost once a day. His total Klout score is 67. According to Klout, his true reach (number of actually engaged followers) is 507K. His amplification probability (likelihood that content will be acted upon – retweets and such) is 48 and his network influence score (how influential is their engaged audience) is 71.

    According to Twitalyzer, Newt’s impact score is 27.9% which puts him in the 99.1 percentile. Not bad.

    Let’s look at some of the other candidates thought to be frontrunners in the primary race.

    Mitt Romney, former Governor of Massachusetts, has 883,000 likes on his Facebook page. It is also an active page, posting almost every day – sometimes twice a day. His most recent 5 posts average 4532 likes and 397 comments, dwarfing Gingrich.

    Romney only has 40,000 followers on Twitter. His Twitalyzer impact score is 27.5%, which puts him in the 99th percentile. His total Klout score is 71, higher than Newts, most likely because it incorporates Facebook to some degree. His true reach on Twitter is 16K with an amplification score of 54 and a network influence score of 76.

    Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee has 583,000 likes on his Facebook page. His last 5 posts average 1148 likes and 230 comments.

    His Twitalyzer impact score is 29.3% and his Klout score is 68 – with a true reach of 54k, and amplification score of 49 and a network influence score of 72.

    Former Alaska Governor and TLC reality star Sarah Palin is like the celebrity of the party if you go by her social media prowess. She has just shy of 3 million likes on his Facebook page, with her last 5 comments averaging 19453 likes and 1983 comments. These numbers dwarf those of any other Republican who has been implicated in the 2014 race.

    Palin has 513,000 twitter followers and her Twitalyzer impact score is 59.5%, putting her in the 99.8 percentile. Her Klout score is 78 with a true reach of 180K, an amplification score of 67 and a network influence score of 82.

    Finally, Tim Pawlenty is the mainstream candidate with the least impressive numbers. He only has 86,000 likes on his Facebook page and is averaging 291 likes and 48 comments on his last 5 posts.

    Pawlenty has 32,000 followers on Twitter and an impact score of 16.5 %. His Klout score is 67 with a 12K true reach, and amplification score of 48 and a network influence score of 72.

    Out of these 5 candidates, Sarah Palin is clearly the social media star. But she has yet to actually announce her candidacy. It is just highly speculated by pundits and insiders that she is thinking about running. Of the candidates who we know are running, Mitt Romney looks like he utilizes social media better than the rest. He is a force on Facebook, garnering massive feedback when he posts. He could stand to expand his Twitter influence, however, by tweeting more frequently and engaging with his audience through replies and retweets.

    People seem to respond to politicians who engage with them through social media.  There is a sense of authenticity and truth that springs from direct messages from the leaders.  Instead of speaking through a spokesman or press release, politicians can (at least feign) real involvement with the people through Facebook and Twitter.  So, in order to compete with the social savvy President in 2014, the GOP is going to have to engage with people on the interwebs with a vigor to match.