WebProNews

Tag: Safari

  • Apple’s Safari Tops 1 Billion Users, Still Distant Second to Chrome

    Apple’s Safari Tops 1 Billion Users, Still Distant Second to Chrome

    Apple’s Safari is now the second most popular browser on the market, with more than 1 billion users, although it still comes in a distant second to Google Chrome.

    Safari is the default browser on all Macs, iPhones, and iPads. Its default status, especially on Apple’s mobile devices, have helped drive it to second place, passing both Firefox and Microsoft Edge, according to Atlas VPN.

    Despite Safari’s gains, Google’s Chrome is still the undisputed 800-lb gorilla in the browser market. Chrome currently has more than 3.3 billion users.

    Interestingly, compared to last year, Microsoft Edge has come in third place, surpassing Firefox with 212 million users. In contrast, Firefox has slipped below the 200 million threshold, coming in at 179 million.

    Many users are growing increasingly concerned with the reach of Google’s Chrome. Not only does Chrome itself dominate the market, but many other browsers are also based on Chrome. Microsoft Edge, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, and others all use the same rendering engine as Chrome. Some users fear this gives Google a dangerous amount of influence over the development of the internet and see Firefox as the last best hope for a free internet.

  • Open Web Advocacy Is Taking On #AppleBrowserBan

    Open Web Advocacy Is Taking On #AppleBrowserBan

    A new organization is trying to challenge Apple, calling for the company to allow third-party browser engines on iOS.

    The Open Web Advocacy (OWA) is a group of developers who want Apple to crack open its walled garden, at least in the context of iOS browsers. While iOS has a number of browsers on the App Store, Apple does now allow those browsers to use their own rendering engines. Instead all of them are required to use the same engine that powers Safari. Whether a user prefers Firefox, Brave, Opera, Chrome, or anything else, they’re essentially just using a differently themed version of Apple’s native browser.

    The OWA wants to challenge the status quo, calling on “regulatory or legislative change” to help ensure the open nature of the web, and protect the ability of developers to use technologies to “write once, deploy anywhere.”

    The OWA says the #AppleBrowserBan makes development far more costly, and inhibits developers’ ability to easily create cross-platform applications.

    Critically this browser ban prevents the emergence of an open and free universal platform for apps, where developers can build their application once and have it work across all consumer devices, be it desktop, laptop, tablet or phone. Instead it forces companies to create multiple separate applications to run on each platform, significantly raising the cost and complexity of development and maintenance. These costs are in addition to the 15% 30% tax charged by the App Store. This greater cost is ultimately passed on to consumers in the form of higher fees, more bug prone applications and the applications not being available on all platforms.

    It remains to be seen if the OWA will be able to gain serious traction, although founding members of the group have already been interviewed in major publications. In the current climate, the group certainly has a much better chance than they would have several years ago.

  • Apple Users Should Update Their Devices Immediately

    Apple Users Should Update Their Devices Immediately

    Apple has released updates to iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and watchOS that fix a major vulnerability in Safari.

    A vulnerability was discovered in Safari earlier this month by FingerPrintJS, one that let “any website track your internet activity and even reveal your identity.” The issue revolved around Apple’s implementation of IndexedDB, a common API that most browsers use to store data. Unfortunately, Apple’s implementation leaked user data.

    While Apple doesn’t go into detail on the specifics of security fixes when it releases an update, to prevent the issue from being further exploited, the most recent OS updates specifically list CVE-2022-22594, the ID used to identify the flaw. The release notes also credit FingerPrintJS for discovering the bug.

    Impact: A website may be able to track sensitive user information

    Description: A cross-origin issue in the IndexDB API was addressed with improved input validation.

    CVE-2022-22594: Martin Bajanik of FingerprintJS

    Needless to say, all Apple users should update their various devices immediately. This is especially important on iOS, since all iOS web browsers use Safari’s rendering engine.

  • PSA: Update to iOS 14.8 Immediately

    PSA: Update to iOS 14.8 Immediately

    Apple has released iOS 14.8, just days before the anticipated release of iOS 15, and the update fixes two serious security issues.

    According to Apple, iOS 14.8 addresses two issues that are both being actively exploited. The first issue revolves around CoreGraphics:

    Processing a maliciously crafted PDF may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

    The second issue involves WebKit, the browser rendering engine that powers Safari, as well as all other iOS browsers:

    Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.

    With the vulnerabilities being actively exploited, all users should update immediately. To update, go to Settings > General > Software Update.

  • Apple’s Privacy Hypocrisy: The $15 Billion Google Deal

    Apple’s Privacy Hypocrisy: The $15 Billion Google Deal

    Google is continuing to pay Apple to remain the default search engine in iOS, a deal that benefits Apple to the tune billions of dollars.

    Google is the dominant search engine by far, but it’s hard to know whether that is the result of true technological superiority or through the sheer power of its market dominance. A key element to that dominance is paying smartphone makers to make Google the default search engine in the browsers they ship with their devices.

    Such an arrangement is extremely profitable for smartphone makers, bringing in a steady stream of income for essentially no work. At the same time, however, it poses a signifiant privacy and moral dilemma for Apple. The Cupertino company has built a reputation around protecting user privacy, often more so than its rivals, including Google. Because the iPhone maker is primarily in the business of selling hardware, it doesn’t rely on monetizing user data the way Google does.

    Despite that stance, however, Apple is projected to reap $15 billion in 2021 for keeping Google the default search engine in iOS Safari, and as much as $20 billion 2022, according to Bernstein analysts, via long-time Apple reporter Philip Elmer-DeWitt.

    While Apple no doubt sees it as a way to give customers what it thinks they want, in terms of the search engine they’re probably most familiar with, it’s still a strange compromise for a company that puts so much value in protecting privacy. It would be far better, and more in line with the company’s overall stance, to refuse Google’s money and offer users a choice when they first set up their iPhones.

    The more time passes, the harder it will be to defend this deal.

  • Third-Party Cookies Get a Stay of Execution as Google Postpones Plans

    Google is pushing back its plans to eliminate support for third-party cookies, buying the advertising industry more time to adapt.

    Third-party cookies are one of the most commonly used methods advertisers use to track individuals as they move across the web. Apple’s Safari, the second-most popular browser behind Google’s Chrome, already blocks third-party cookies by default. This makes it more difficult for advertisers to track users and build a profile about them.

    Google had previously planned on following Apple’s lead by early 2022. Because advertisers have built an entire industry around surreptitiously tracking users as they browse the web, and building detailed profiles on them, the thought of being cut off from one of the primary ways to do so caused much hand-wringing among ad companies.

    Google is now saying it will not begin making the change until mid-2023, with the process completed approximately three months later in late 2023. The company said the revised timeline would provide advertisers the time they neede to adapt and adopt more privacy-conscious advertising methods.

    This will allow sufficient time for public discussion on the right solutions, continued engagement with regulators, and for publishers and the advertising industry to migrate their services. This is important to avoid jeopardizing the business models of many web publishers which support freely available content. And by providing privacy-preserving technology, we as an industry can help ensure that cookies are not replaced with alternative forms of individual tracking, and discourage the rise of covert approaches like fingerprinting.

  • Firefox Update Brings Fresh New Look, Improved Experience

    Firefox Update Brings Fresh New Look, Improved Experience

    Mozilla has announced the latest version of Firefox, sporting a new look and improved user experience.

    Once the second most popular browser, Firefox is now a distant third, behind Google Chrome and Apple Safari. Microsoft Edge is in fourth place, nipping at its heals. Mozilla has been working to reverse its fortunes in an effort to regain market share.

    As part of that effort, the company has released the latest update, a major overhaul of the user experience. According to the company, it analyzed more than 17 billion clicks to better determine how to streamline the browsing experience.

    Going into the Firefox redesign, our team studied how people interact with the browser, observing their patterns and behaviors. We listened to feedback and gathered ideas from regular people who just want to have an easier experience on the web. We obsessed over distractions, extra clicks and wasted time. The resulting new design is simple, modern and fast and delivers a beautiful experience to support what people do most in Firefox.

    One of the most visible changes is a redesigned tab bar, more rounded and floating above the toolbar. The new update also includes new icons, crisp typography, streamlined menus and improved spacing in the UI.

    Privacy features also received a major boost, building on Firefox’s already stellar reputation in that area.

    All browsers have a private browsing mode, but none match Firefox. The popular Total Cookie Protection moves from the optional strict setting to always-on in private browsing. This feature maintains a separate “cookie jar” for each website you visit while browsing privately. Any time a site deposits a cookie, Firefox locks it up in its own cookie jar so that it can’t be shared with any other website.

    The new version is available for all major platforms, including desktop and mobile.

  • iOS 14.5 Safari Will Mask IP Address From Google

    iOS 14.5 Safari Will Mask IP Address From Google

    Apple is ramping up its efforts to protect user privacy, including a feature in iOS 14.5 that will mask IP addresses in Safari.

    Apple has been making significant changes to iOS and iPadOS, forcing app makers to include privacy labels to disclose what information they track. The company is also preparing to include a feature that will force apps to ask for permission to track users, rather than doing it automatically.

    Now the company is working on its next big privacy upgrade, masking Safari’s IP address. Companies can use a device’s IP address to help build a profile of the individual’s browsing habits. Given that Apple’s default search engine is Google, this is a real concern.

    First noticed by a Reddit user and reported by The 8-Bit, the feature is enabled when Safe Browsing is active. Safe Browsing is activated by turning on the “Fraudulent Website Warning” in Settings > Safari.

    Maciej Stachowiak, Apple’s Head of Webkit Engineering, provided a bit of additional detail about how the feature will work.

    As Stachowiak explains, iOS 14.5 Safari will re-route traffic through an Apple proxy service to hide IP addresses. This should provide a significant level of additional privacy to iOS and iPadOS users.

  • Fortnite Coming Back to iPhones and iPads…Sort Of

    Fortnite Coming Back to iPhones and iPads…Sort Of

    Apple and Epic may be fighting it out in court, but it appears a path has been cleared for Fortnite to return to iOS devices.

    The BBC has discovered the popular game will make its way back to iOS devices via a version of Nvidia’s GeForce, a cloud gaming service that will run in the iOS version of Safari. Because the service will be browser-based, and not installed via the App Store, Apple will not be able to charge its usual fee.

    Finding a way to get Fortnite back on iOS devices is likely a big priority for Epic. As the BBC points out, 116 million Fortnite players played on iOS. Even worse for the company, 76 million of those players only played on iOS.

    The company had previously tried to get the court to grant an injunction preventing Apple from removing Fortnite from the App Store. A judge sided with Apple however, and pointed out the hypocrisy of Epic’s argument.

    The judge made the point that Epic cannot claim Apple is hurting its business by removing Fortnite from the App Store, when it was Epic’s decision to break the App Store rules that caused harm to itself. Had Epic continued paying the App Store fees while challenging Apple in court, the company would have been reimbursed those fees if it won its case, essentially costing it nothing to continue with the status quo while the courts decided. Instead, Epic chose the more drastic route of breaking the App Store’s rules and forcing Apple’s response.

    The end result has been up to 76 million users potentially cut off from their favorite game, and Epic cut off from a substantial source of income. As a result, Nvidia’s solution will likely be a welcome option for company and customers alike.

  • WWDC 2020 Part 3: macOS Big Sur

    WWDC 2020 Part 3: macOS Big Sur

    Apple unveiled the next version of macOS, named “Big Sur.” The design of the OS features a number of refinements.

    Apple has repeatedly said it has no intention of merging iOS and macOS, as each has a place in the company’s ecosystem. That doesn’t mean they can’t benefit from each other, however, and it’s apparent that many of the Mac’s new features are inspired by some of the best features of iOS.

    Interface

    Craig Federighi highlighted Apple’s intention of making its various platform feel more cohesive, making it easier for users to move from one device to another.

    macOS Icons
    macOS Icons

    The updated interface includes icons that are more reminiscent of iOS, as well as a more colorful interface and increased transparency.

    Mac Catalyst

    Mac Catalyst receives an upgrade in macOS Big Sur. Catalyst is the compatibility layer that makes it possible to port iOS and iPadOS apps to macOS

    Mac Catalyst
    Mac Catalyst

    Developers will be able to optimize Catalyst apps to take full advantage of the Mac’s resolution. Apps will also have access to menu and keyboard APIs, as well as new controls, such as checkboxes and date pickers.

    The new Maps and Messages are good examples of Catalyst apps.

    Safari

    Big Sur has the biggest update to Safari since it was introduced. The company has focused on performance, improving not only its already good JavaScript performance, but page-load performance as well.

    Privacy will take center stage in Big Sur, making it much easier for users to see how websites attempt to track their data.

    Safari Privacy
    Safari Privacy

    Web Extensions API will now make it easier to bring extension for other browsers over to Safari. There will be a new category in the Mac App Store to showcase Safari extensions.

    Extensions will be managed in a way that preserves user privacy. Users will be able to manage what data an extension can access, as well as limitations on how long it can access that data.

    Safari will also feature built-in translation. Safari will detect when it encounters a page that is not the same as the primary language on the computer and display a translate button. Clicking the button will translate the text, and even text off of the screen will dynamically translate as Safari scrolls down.

    Safari Translation
    Safari Translation

    Next is Apple’s biggest announcement of the day: Custom Silicon

  • Apple Safari Now Blocking All Third-Party Cookies

    Apple Safari Now Blocking All Third-Party Cookies

    Apple’s Safari web browser joins the Tor browser as one of only two that fully block all third-party cookies.

    The move has been a long time coming, and Safari has been gradually adding more features that limit the overall effectiveness of third-party cookies for tracking. As a result, in a WebKit blog post, the developers downplay the change as not a big deal, although they do highlight some of the significant benefits the move brings.

    One of the biggest advantages is disabling login fingerprinting. Login fingerprinting is a technique that “allows a website to invisibly detect where you are logged in and is viable in any browser without full third-party cookie blocking.”

    Similarly, the move “disables cross-site request forgery attacks against websites through third-party requests,” and “removes the ability to use an auxiliary third-party domain to identify users. Such a setup could otherwise persist IDs even when users delete website data for the first party.”

    There are a number of additional benefits, including paving the way for other browsers to adopt a similar approach, and simplifying things for developers. Overall, this is a good move for customers, helping protect their privacy. It will hopefully motivate site admins to adopt other ways of monetizing their content, such as the Firefox Better Web initiative.

  • DuckDuckGo Releases Tracker Radar to Expose Hidden Tracking

    DuckDuckGo Releases Tracker Radar to Expose Hidden Tracking

    DuckDuckGo is the preeminent privacy-oriented search engine and the company is taking it a step further by releasing a tool to help expose hidden tracking.

    As the company points out, a quality tracking blocker is critical to online privacy. Without one, advertisers can amass a shocking amount of detail about web users, including location history, browsing history, shopping history and more. Combining the data they collect can even give them a pretty good idea of exactly how old a user is, their ethnicity, preferences and habits.

    When the company started exploring possibilities, it was not happy with the state of current options.

    “When we set out to add tracker protection, we found that existing lists of trackers were mostly manually curated, which meant they were often stale and never comprehensive,” reads the company’s announcement. “And, even worse, those lists sometimes break websites, which hinders mainstream adoption. So, over the last couple of years we built our own data set of trackers based on a crawling process that doesn’t have these drawbacks. We call it DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar. It is automatically generated, constantly updated, and continually tested.

    “Today we’re proud to release DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar to the world, and are also open sourcing the code that generates it. This follows our recent release of our Smarter Encryption data and crawling code (that powers the upgraded website encryption component in our apps and extensions).

    “Tracker Radar contains the most common cross-site trackers and includes detailed information about their tracking behavior, including prevalence, ownership, fingerprinting behavior, cookie behavior, privacy policy, rules for specific resources (with exceptions for site breakage), and performance data.”

    Tracker Radar is included in DuckDuckGo’s Privacy Browser for iOS and Android, as well as the Privacy essentials browser extension for Safari, Firefox and Chrome on the desktop. Developers can also download Tracker Radar and include it in their own tools.

  • Safari Will Stop Accepting Security Certificates Older Than 13 Months

    Safari Will Stop Accepting Security Certificates Older Than 13 Months

    In an effort to improve web security, Apple’s Safari browser will only accept HTTPS security certificates that expire in 398 days or less.

    The move has been considered by Apple, Google and others for some time. The hope is that by rejecting older security certificates, it will force website administrators to keep their certificates updated with the latest cryptographic technology, as opposed to using older, less secure certificates. It will also help reduce the impact of a certificate that may have been compromised, unbeknownst to the admin.

    The move is not without its challenges, however, as it will create more work for site admins. However, that extra work to keep things current is precisely what will help make the whole system more secure, keeping security forefront in the minds and workflows of admins.

    In a post about Apple’s move, Dean Coclin, DigiCert’s Senior Director of Business Development, voiced agreement with the change.

    “DigiCert agrees that shorter lifetimes help enhance the security of the ecosystem and has the tools necessary to help our customers automate the certificate lifecycle process,” writes Coclin. “We support short-lived certificates, with lifetimes as short as a few hours for customers with advanced automation capabilities.”

  • Apple May Allow iOS Users to Change Default Apps

    Apple May Allow iOS Users to Change Default Apps

    Apple may (finally!) be on the verge of allowing other apps to be set as the defaults in iOS.

    Since iOS was introduced, users have not been able to change the default apps, such as Mail, Safari and Music. While other apps could be installed and used, they could never be set as the defaults. Any clicked web links would still open Safari and any clicked email links would still use Mail. While Safari and Mail are both extremely capable programs, there are other apps that offer different advantages and, in some cases, are better. Microsoft Outlook, for example, routinely wins praise for its features, not to mention integration with the rest of Office.

    According to Bloomberg, people familiar with the matter say Apple may finally be ready to give up some control and let users set their preferred apps as the defaults. The move is being considered amid ongoing scrutiny and accusations that Apple’s apps have an unfair advantage over its rivals, an argument that certainly has weight to it. While some tech savvy individuals may opt to use other apps for browsing and email, and jump through the necessary hoops to make it work, the average user will simply use the easiest option.

    Apple is also said to be considering a similar change for the music service on the HomePod, as well as letting users change the default music service when using Siri on an iOS device. While the sources say nothing has been finalized, it’s possible these changes could happen later this year.

    Apple has been pushing the iPad as a computer replacement for some time. This is an important and necessary step that should have been taken years ago to assist that goal. Hopefully, with new opportunities available, it will further encourage developers to create desktop-class apps in categories they otherwise might have ignored.

  • New Google Chrome Feature May Drive Users to Firefox

    New Google Chrome Feature May Drive Users to Firefox

    The Register is reporting on a new feature in an upcoming version of Google Chrome that has privacy-conscious users worried. A recent API called getInstalledRelatedApps may allow websites to determine what apps are installed on a user’s device.

    At first glance, the API seems to have an admirable purpose. If users have both web and native applications installed, they could be bombarded by duplicate sets of notifications. If a website can determine that its native app is installed, it would then prioritize notifications for the native app. Unfortunately, the API doesn’t really seem to be aimed at improving the experience—not for the user at least.

    In response to a question from Opera developer Daniel Bratell, expressing concern about how this API would help users, Google engineer Rayan Kanso wrote:

    “Although this isn’t an API that would directly benefit users, it indirectly benefits them through improved web experiences,” Kanso wrote. “We received very positive OT [off-topic] feedback from partners using this API, and the alternative is them using hacks to figure whether their native app is installed.”

    In other words, this API is more about making it easier for web and app developers’ marketing needs than it is truly making users’ lives easier.

    The privacy implications are clear: If websites can determine what apps are installed on a person’s phone or tablet, it can provide a relatively complete picture, otherwise known as a fingerprint, about that person’s habits.

    As The Register points out, Peter Snyder, a privacy researcher at browser maker Brave, voiced his own concerns:

    “I don’t follow the claim about non-fingerprint-ability. If I’m a company with a large number of apps (e.g. google), with 16-32 apps registered in app stores, the subset of which apps any user has installed is likely to be a very strong semi-identifier, no, and so be extremely risky for the user / valuable for the fingerprinter, no?

    “Apologies if I’m misunderstanding, but this seems like a very clear privacy risk.

    Put differently, if this isn’t a privacy risk, whats the rational behind disallowing this in private browsing mode?”

    With browsers like Firefox and Safari placing an emphasis on privacy and security, it’s a safe bet this is yet another move that will drive users away from Chrome.

  • Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google released its Q4 and fiscal year 2014 financial results on Thursday with full year revenue up 19% year-over-year at $66 billion and revenue of $18.1 billion for the quarter, which was a 15% year-over-year increase.

    During the company’s conference call, CFO and Senior Vice President Patrick Pichette was asked about the impact of Yahoo’s deal with Mozilla to replace Google as the default search experience in the Firefox browser. here’s what he had to say (via Seeking Alpha’s transcript):

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them.

    And so that’s the strategy that we’re using and we just don’t comment on any of our – we’ve never commented on any of our deals, so we want comment on Mozilla either.

    The subject came up again a bit later in the call, and Pichette had a little more to say:

    So on the issue of partnerships, Google has a lot of partnerships, right, it’s got – it’s an anchor of our strategy, because that actually gives us distribution, distribution is good. And so we also we look for partnerships in many spaces.

    Partnerships have to be win-wins, and in that sense, right, we’ll always look for those combinations. But also at the end of the day, there’s a second piece of the strategy, which is, as I said earlier, building amazing product, because if you build the amazing products then people want to distribute you product.

    And so that’s why, we have a meet in the whole search team that actually do this amazing job through the knowledge graph and all of the other elements of search, and no matter what the device, no matter the location, no matter the time of day. If we give you the answer as you’re looking for and 10 clicks less than it was before and then even faster and better all the time, that’s what wins, and that’s the core of what we’re focused on, and then people will find the way to get the Google.

    So, yes, partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    Google has already been showing concern about losing Mozilla. It definitely matters. Google has been trying to get people to switch back with messages like this:

    And one on the Google homepage in the Firefox browser, which says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default engine.”

    Yahoo also reported its earnings this week, and Mayer talked more about her company’s deal with Mozilla. She appears to be quite excited about it, and is clearly thirsty for a similar partnership with Apple to replace Google as the default experience in Safari. Whether or not that happens remains to be seen. Microsoft and Google both want that too.

    Last week, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014, which looked at the impact of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” the report said. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” it added. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    According to that report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Here’s Google’s full earnings release:

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – January 29, 2015 –  Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL) today announced financial results for the quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

    “Google’s full year revenue for 2014 was $66 billion, up 19% year on year,” said Patrick Pichette, CFO of Google, “and this quarter, our revenue was $18.1 billion, despite strong currency headwinds.”

    Q4 Financial Summary

    Google Inc. reported consolidated revenues of $18.10 billion for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 15% compared to the fourth quarter of 2013. Google Inc. reports advertising revenues, consistent with GAAP, on a gross basis without deducting traffic acquisition costs (TAC). In the fourth quarter of 2014, TAC totaled $3.62 billion, or 22% of advertising revenues.

    Operating income, operating margin, net income, and earnings per share (EPS) are reported on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP measures, as well as free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, are described below and are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measures at the end of this release.

    • GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP net income (including net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.74 billion, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP EPS (including impact from net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin exclude stock-based compensation (SBC) expense from continuing operations. Non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS exclude SBC expense from continuing operations, net of the related tax benefits, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations.
    • In the fourth quarter of 2014, the expense related to SBC from continuing operations and the related tax benefits were $1,201 million and $255 million compared to $873 million and $184 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. In addition, net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    On October 29, 2014, we closed the sale of Motorola Mobile business. Financial results of Motorola Mobile are presented as Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 through the date of sale.  The sale resulted in a gain of $740 million, net of tax, which was included in Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2014.  All references to results of our operations have been retroactively restated for all prior periods to exclude the results from Motorola Mobile.

    On April 2, 2014, we issued shares of Class C capital stock as a dividend to our stockholders. Except for the number of authorized shares and par value, all references to share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for all prior periods shown to reflect the stock split, which was effected in the form of a stock dividend.

    Q4 Financial Highlights

    Revenues and Monetization – Google Inc. revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 were $18.10 billion, representing a 15% increase over fourth quarter of 2013 revenues of $15.71 billion.

    Sites Revenues – Our sites generated revenues of $12.43 billion, or 69% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents an 18% increase over fourth quarter 2013 sites revenues of $10.54 billion.

    Network Revenues – Our partner sites generated revenues of $3.72 billion, or 20% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.   This represents a 6% increase over fourth quarter 2013 network revenues of $3.52 billion.

    Other Revenues – Other revenues were $1.95 billion, or 11% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.  This represents a 19% increase over fourth quarter 2013 other revenues of $1.65 billion.

    International Revenues – Our revenues from outside of the United States totaled $10.23 billion, representing 56% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 58% in the third quarter of 2014 and 56% in the fourth quarter of 2013. Our revenues from the United Kingdom totaled $1.66 billion, representing 9% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 10% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Foreign Exchange Impact on Revenues – Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the third quarter of 2014 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $541 million higher. Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the fourth quarter of 2013 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $616 million higher. In the fourth quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit of $148 million to revenues through our foreign exchange risk management program, compared to $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Reconciliations of our non-GAAP international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange and hedging to GAAP international revenues are included at the end of this release.

    Paid Clicks – Aggregate paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, increased approximately 14% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 11% over the third quarter of 2014. Sites paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads we serve on Google owned and operated properties across different geographies and devices including search, YouTube engagement ads like TrueView, and other owned and operated properties including Maps and Finance, increased approximately 25% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 18% over the third quarter of 2014. Network paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on non-Google properties participating in our AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content, and AdMob businesses, decreased approximately 11% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 7% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Cost-Per-Click – Average cost-per-click, which includes clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, decreased approximately 3% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 3% over the third quarter of 2014. Cost-per-click for Google sites decreased approximately 8% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 8% over the third quarter of 2014. Network cost-per-click increased approximately 6% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 10% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Traffic Acquisition Costs – Traffic acquisition costs (TAC), the portion of revenues shared with Google’s partners, increased to $3.62 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $3.31 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. TAC as a percentage of advertising revenues was 22% in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 24% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    The majority of TAC is related to amounts ultimately paid to our Network members, which totaled $2.66 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014. TAC also includes amounts paid to our distribution partners who distribute our browser or otherwise direct search queries to our website, which totaled $968 million in the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Other Cost of Revenues – Other cost of revenues, which is comprised primarily of data center operational expenses, content acquisition costs,  revenue share payments to mobile carriers and original equipment manufacturers, and hardware inventory costs, increased to $3.30 billion, or 18% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $2.94 billion, or 19% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Operating Expenses – Operating expenses, other than cost of revenues, were $6.78 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, or 37% of revenues, compared to $5.03 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, or 32% of revenues.

    Depreciation and Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment and Amortization Expenses – Depreciation and loss on disposal of property and equipment and amortization and impairment of intangibles and other assets were $1.27 billion for the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $1.04 billion for the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) – In the fourth quarter of 2014, the total charge related to SBC from continuing operations was $1,201 million, compared to $873 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. We currently estimate SBC charges for grants made to employees prior to December 31, 2014 to be approximately $4.30 billion for 2015. This estimate does not include expenses to be recognized related to employee stock awards that are granted after December 31, 2014.

    Operating Income – GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Interest and Other Income, Net – Interest and other income, net, was $128 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $112 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Income Taxes – Our effective tax rate was 16% for the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations – Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 includes a gain of $740 million, net of tax, from the sale of Motorola Mobile business.

    Net Income – GAAP consolidated net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP consolidated net income was $4.74 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures – Net cash provided by operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2014 totaled $6.36 billion, compared to $5.24 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. In the fourth quarter of 2014, capital expenditures were $3.55 billion, the majority of which was for real estate purchases, production equipment, and data center construction. Free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. In the fourth quarter of 2014, free cash flow was $2.81 billion compared to $2.98 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures.

    A reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities, the GAAP measure of liquidity, is included at the end of this release.

    Cash – As of December 31, 2014, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $64.40 billion.

    Headcount – On a worldwide basis, we employed 53,600 full-time employees as of December 31, 2014, compared to 51,564 full-time employees as of September 30, 2014.

    WEBCAST AND CONFERENCE CALL INFORMATION

    A live audio webcast of Google’s fourth quarter and fiscal year 2014 earnings release call will be available at http://investor.google.com/webcast.html. The call begins today at 1:30 PM (PT) / 4:30 PM (ET). This press release, the financial tables, as well as other supplemental information including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, are also available on that site.

    We also announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business and financial performance, SEC filings, notices of investor events and our press and earnings releases, on our investor relations website (http://investor.google.com) and our investor relations Google+ page (https://plus.google.com/+GoogleInvestorRelations/posts).

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include statements regarding our investments in areas of strategic focus, our expected SBC charges, and our plans to make significant capital expenditures. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, unforeseen changes in our hiring patterns and our need to expend capital to accommodate the growth of the business, as well as those risks and uncertainties included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  and our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, which are on file with the SEC and are available on our investor relations website at investor.google.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of January 29, 2015, and we undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law.

    ABOUT NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP EPS, free cash flow, and non-GAAP international revenues. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures,” “Reconciliation from net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow,” and “Reconciliation from GAAP international revenues to non-GAAP international revenues” included at the end of this release.

    We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. Our management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures that may not be indicative of our recurring core business operating results, meaning our operating performance excluding not only non-cash charges, such as SBC, but also discrete cash charges that are infrequent in nature. We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical performance and liquidity as well as comparisons to our competitors’ operating results. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income excluding expenses related to SBC, and, as applicable, other special items. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenues. Google considers these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the effect of SBC, and as applicable, other special items so that Google’s management and investors can compare Google’s recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, Google’s management believes that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes SBC allows investors to make meaningful comparisons between Google’s recurring core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing Google’s management with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating Google’s own recurring core business operating results over different periods of time. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income versus operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes some costs, namely, SBC, that are recurring. SBC has been and will continue to be for the foreseeable future a significant recurring expense in Google’s business. Second, SBC is an important part of our employees’ compensation. Third, the components of the costs that we exclude in our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that our peer companies exclude when they report their results of operations. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and EPS. We define non-GAAP net income as net income excluding expenses related to SBC and, as applicable, other special items less the related tax effects, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations. The tax effects of SBC and, as applicable, other special items are calculated using the tax-deductible portion of SBC, and, as applicable, other special items, and applying the entity-specific, U.S. federal and blended state tax rates.  We define non-GAAP EPS as non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted average outstanding shares, on a fully-diluted basis. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that Google uses non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we exclude from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS the tax effects associated with SBC and, as applicable, other special items. Without excluding these tax effects, investors would only see the gross effect that excluding these expenses had on our operating results. The same limitations described above regarding Google’s use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS together with net income and EPS calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after the acquisition of property and equipment, including information technology infrastructure and land and buildings, can be used for strategic opportunities, including investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions, and strengthening the balance sheet. Analysis of free cash flow also facilitates management’s comparisons of our operating results to competitors’ operating results. A limitation of using free cash flow versus the GAAP measure of net cash provided by operating activities as a means for evaluating Google is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash balance from operations for the period because it excludes cash used for capital expenditures during the period. Our management compensates for this limitation by providing information about our capital expenditures on the face of the statement of cash flows and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Google has computed free cash flow using the same consistent method from quarter to quarter and year to year.

    Non-GAAP international revenues. We define non-GAAP international revenues as international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and hedging activities. Non-GAAP international revenues are calculated by translating current quarter revenues using prior quarter and prior year exchange rates, as well as excluding any hedging gains realized in the current quarter. We consider non-GAAP international revenues as a useful metric as it facilitates management’s internal comparison to our historical performance.

    The accompanying tables have more details on the non-GAAP financial measures that are most directly comparable to GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations between these financial measures.

    Image via Google

  • Yahoo Really Wants That Apple Deal

    Yahoo Really Wants That Apple Deal

    Yahoo made some big waves in late 2014 when it partnered with Mozilla to replace Google as the default search experience in Firefox. Apple’s similar deal with Google is near its expiration, and Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seems really interested in that.

    Do you think Apple should drop Google and go with a different search provider like Yahoo or Microsoft? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Yahoo reported its Q4 earnings on Tuesday. During the conference call, Mayer said this about the Mozilla partnership in her prepared remarks (via SeekingAlpha’s transcript):

    External sources estimate that Mozilla has 3% to 5% of the North American search market. So this is a significant opportunity. We began serving Mozilla partly through December, so we’ve not yet had a complete calendar month of data on the deal but we are already impressed with the volume Mozilla search has brought to our marketplace and the insightfulness and agility of the Mozilla team…Our new partnership with Mozilla gives us reason to be optimistic that search will continue to be a growth story.

    During the question-and-answer session, Mayer was asked about Yahoo’s ongoing search partnership with Microsoft (which she reportedly hates) as well as the company’s new deal with Mozilla to become the default search experience in the Firefox browser. She said the “search alliance” hits the halfway point later in Q1, and that the deal has provisions that allow them to consider adjustments to its relationship with Microsoft. They’re actively exploring options and different models, she said.

    She said:

    On Mozilla overall we haven’t disclosed the financial arrangement between the two companies…it’s about 3% to 5% of the North America search market and overall, the volume’s been fantastic and the teams are just terrific to work with. That said it’s a really significant partnership and will always take time to equilibrate and tune our performance with the Mozilla traffic. And so we are very hopeful about it but at this point really too early to tell.

    There have been reports that Yahoo is also interested in taking Google’s place as the default search experience in Apple’s Safari browser, which would be huge for the company in terms of gaining more significant market share. Apple has in recent years been distancing itself more and more from Google. Mayer was asked about this during the Q&A as well. She said:

    The Safari platform is basically one of the premiere search engine in the world, if not the premiere search engine in the world. We are definitely in the search distribution business. I think we stated that really clearly in the past and I think with Mozilla and also in addition we brought Amazon and eBay onboard with smaller distribution partnerships in Q4, we are in search distribution business and anyone who is in that business needs to be interested in the Safari deal.

    The Safari users are among the most engaged and lucrative users in the world and it’s something that we would really like to be able to provide. We work really closely with Mozilla to ultimately bring to their users an experience that they designed and that they feel really suit those users and we welcome the opportunity with any other partner to do the same, particularly one with Apple’s volume and end user base.

    In other words, yeah, she really wants that deal. Kara Swisher who has covered Yahoo for years probably better than anyone else in the industry, liveblogged the earnings call, and commented, “Mayer appeared to practically salivate at the prospect if Apple throws over Google for someone else. Issue: Microsoft. Another issue: Yahoo search technology would have to be majorly upgraded.”

    In response to another question, Mayer went on to say more about Yahoo as a search partner in response to another question:

    Well certainly on search and across the board we pride ourselves on being the best partner in Silicon Valley. We work across the board with Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, we have different Samsung, we have different partnerships with all of these different providers and it’s not easy, they can’t look at each other but we work well with them.

    She said the reason they work so well is because of how flexible Yahoo is.

    In 2014, things started to get really interesting for Yahoo’s search business for the first time in a long time. 2015 may just shape up to be a major comeback year for the company on that front.

    Google is already showing concern about Yahoo’s place in Firefox. If Yahoo scores the Safari deal, it’s going to be a whole new ballgame.

    Google has been trying to get people to switch back with messages like this:

    And one on the Google homepage in the Firefox browser, which says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default engine.”

    Google also reported its earnings this week, and also discussed Yahoo’s deal with Mozilla a little. CFO Patrick Pichette said (via Seeking Alpha’s transcript):

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them….partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    Last week, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014, which looked at the impact of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” the report said. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” it added. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    According to that report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Do you think Google is in danger of losing any significant amount of market share? Do you think Apple will drop Google? Would it go with Yahoo? Tell us what you think.

    Note: This article has been updated from a previous version to include additional information.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Could Google Lose Apple Like It Lost Firefox?

    Google may be in danger of losing a major deal for its search engine, which could result in a reduction in market share.

    Google has already lost out to Yahoo as the default search engine for Mozilla’s Firefox browser in the U.S. While Google will remain the default experience for Firefox in Europe, that could change in the future. Mozilla also elected to go with Yandex and Baidu in Russia and China respectively.

    According to a new report from The Information, Apple’s deal with Google will expire next year, and Yahoo and Microsoft are both eager to step in as a replacement, which shouldn’t really come as much of a surprise.

    As Bing has basically acknowledged that it can’t win the war against Google from Bing.com, such a deal could be of major help to the search engine. Meanwhile, Yahoo has really been on the upswing with its search business, and no doubt wants to continue that momentum.

    While this could ultimately come down to a bidding war, Apple is also not likely to want to compromise the user experience, so Microsoft and Yahoo will have to prove that they can do search just as well as the king.

    Yahoo, of course, once was the king, but that was long ago. Under former Googler Marissa Mayer, however, the company has been making some significant moves in tech. Becoming the default search for Safari would be huge for the company.

    Apple, which in recent years has increasingly tried to distance itself from dependence on Google, has already partnered with Microsoft to make Bing the default web search on Siri.

    The search engine Apple chooses could have a major impact on the search landscape. It’s hard to say just how big of an impact though, as Google would certainly still be an option and a setting adjustment away.

    Image via Apple

  • Shareaholic Browser Report: Safari Is On The Rise

    Shareaholic has released its latest Browser Share Report, which indicates that Safari is creeping up in market share.

    The data comes from 250 million web users visiting over 200,000 publishers in Shareaholic’s network. Here’s how it shook out over the past eight months:

    “As someone responsible for a website, you should make it a point to know which the most popular browsers your audience uses are,” notes Shareaholic’s Danny Wong. “Armed with that information, you can go ahead and build digital experiences that work seamlessly across those specified browsers. The following data reveals the world’s most popular browsers, including their respective market shares and how much those shares have grown or declined since our last published study.”

    Chrome hasn’t seen much movement in recent months, though it still dominates the landscape. Safari’s combined share of Safari plus Safari in-app has jumped about five percentage points to approximately 26%. This is attributed to “explosive growth” in Safari in-app usage.

    “Last month, Apple announced its Q2 2014 earnings report which revealed earnings that beat Wall Street analyst expectations due to still strong iPhone sales. It is no wonder why Safari is performing so well,” notes Wong.

    Out of all the browsers analyzed, only Safari’s in-app browser and the stock Android browser saw significant growth. Over half of them were actually in decline. Opera Mini’s share grew, but at the expense of Opera’s desktop browser.

    Check out Shareaholic’s blog for more visualizations.

    Image via Shareaholic

  • Google Pays $17 Million To States Over ‘Safari-Gate’

    Last year, Google was handed the largest fine for a single company in FTC history when it was penalized to the tune of $22.5 million in relation to the tracking of Safari users. Critics felt the fine didn’t go far enough, but a federal judge disagreed last November, ruling that the settlement was “fair, adequate and reasonable.”

    Google had been accused of placing cookies on Safari-users’ devices when they visited sites in the DoubleClick network back in 2011 and early 2012. Google maintained that it collected no personal data.

    Today, Google settled with 37 states and the District of Columbia for $17 million over what came to be known as “Safari-gate”.

    A Google spokesperson is quoted as saying, “We work hard to get privacy right at Google and have taken steps to remove the ad cookies, which collected no personal information, from Apple’s browsers. We’re pleased to have worked with the state attorneys general to reach this agreement.”

    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said, “Consumers should be able to know whether there are other eyes surfing the web with them. By tracking millions of people without their knowledge, Google violated not only their privacy, but also their trust. We must give consumers the reassurance that they can browse the Internet safely and securely. My office will continue to protect New Yorkers from any attempts to deliberately expose their personal data.”

    His state gets $899,580 of the $17 million.

    According to the AG, Google has agreed to the following:

    • Not deploy the type of code used in this case to override a browser’s cookie blocking settings without the consumer’s consent unless it is necessary to do so in order to detect, prevent or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues.
    • Not misrepresent or omit material information to consumers about how they can use any particular Google product, service, or tool to directly manage how Google serves advertisements to their browsers.
    • Improve the information it gives consumers regarding cookies, their purpose, and how the cookies are managed by consumers using Google’s products or services and tools.
    • Maintain systems designed to ensure the expiration of the third-party cookies set on Safari Web browsers while their default settings had been circumvented.

    You can read the settlement here.

    Image: Google

  • Apple Adds Yandex As Safari Search Choice In Some Countries

    Apple is giving its users more search choices with its upcoming operating system releases – iOS 7 and OS X Mavericks. Both were unveiled at the company’s Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday.

    In the iOS 7 demo, it was revealed that Siri has some new features, and among them are Bing web search results, not to mention Twitter search and Wikipedia content. In addition to potentially making Bing more of a factor in users’ search habits, the features also help Apple better compete with Google’s (and Android’s) conversational search and Knowledge Graph.

    But that’s not all that Apple has done with search. While the company didn’t exactly announce it, it has also made Russian search engine Yandex available as an option in Safari in both iOS 7 and OS X Mavericks. This is the case in Russia, Ukraine and Turkey, where that search engine already has a substantial user base.

    Now, Apple hasn’t gone so far as to make Yandex the default search in these countries, at least not in the beta that developers have gotten their hands on.

    Safari adds Yandex

    This signals that Apple isn’t ready to completely abandon Google just yet, despite the increasingly rocky relationship between the two companies. If you’ll recall, Apple recently dropped Google Maps for its own Maps product, and some have speculated that it’s only a matter of time before Google is no longer the default search on Apple products.

    That could still happen, and we could just be in the early stages of Apple phasing it out. TechCrunch reported earlier this year, however, that Google could pay Apple $1 billion next year to remain the default search engine on iOS. How much would Microsoft pay? Or Yandex?

    [via GigaOm]