WebProNews

Tag: Privacy

  • DuckDuckGo Grew by 46% in 2021, Averaging 100 Million Daily Searches

    DuckDuckGo Grew by 46% in 2021, Averaging 100 Million Daily Searches

    DuckDuckGo is making major headway in the search market, growing by 46% in 2021 and averaging more than 100 million daily searches.

    DuckDuckGo is a privacy-focused search engine that does not track or profile its users, unlike Google or Bing. The company does rely on advertising, but those ads are based solely on the keywords and content of a specific search.

    While the company’s market share pales in comparison to Google, it is solidly in fourth place, behind Google, Bing, and Yahoo. According to Bleeping Computer, DuckDuckGo saw its searches go from 23.6 billion in 2020 to 34.6 billion in 2021. That translates to a daily average in 2021 of 100 million, up from 79 million in 2020.

    Obviously, DuckDuckGo still has a long way to go before it represents any real threat to Google, but the company continues to prove that profits don’t have to come at the expense of user privacy.

  • US Carriers Deny Blocking iCloud Private Relay — Mostly

    US Carriers Deny Blocking iCloud Private Relay — Mostly

    Following reports that T-Mobile was blocking Apple’s iCloud Private Relay, all three major US carriers have denied actively blocking it — for the most part.

    iCloud Private Relay is a feature introduced as a beta in iOS 15 and macOS Monterey. The feature is similar to a VPN, and hides a person’s internet traffic. Some users reported that T-Mobile was starting to block the feature, something that 9to5Mac confirmed.

    According to The Verge, all three carriers are trying to reassure users they are not intentionally or actively blocking Private Relay. Verizon and AT&T, in particular, said they are not blocking the feature in any way.

    Things are a bit more complicated with T-Mobile. The vast majority of customers will not experience any issues, but accounts that are using T-Mobile’s Family Controls won’t be able to use Private Relay.

    “Customers who chose plans and features with content filtering (e.g. parent controls) do not have access to the iCloud Private Relay to allow these services to work as designed. All other customers have no restrictions,” T-Mobile’s spokesperson The Verge.

    That explanation is inline with Apple’s own description of Private Relay:

    Networks that require the ability to audit traffic or perform network-based filtering will block access to Private Relay.

    T-Mobile also told The Verge that it discovered an issue with Private Relay that could cause it to not work, and informed Apple so they could fix it.

    “Overnight our team identified that in the 15.2 iOS release, some device settings default to the feature being toggled off. We have shared this with Apple. This is not specific to T-Mobile.” 

    A Potential Future Showdown

    Hopefully all three carriers maintain their current stance. As The Verge points out, European carriers — including T-Mobile — have been campaigning against Private Relay, even asking the EU Commission to block the feature. The carriers claim it is “cutting off other networks and servers from accessing vital network data and metadata, including those operators in charge of the connectivity.”

    There’s two issues with the carriers’ actions:

    First, should the carriers succeed in convincing the EU Commission to block the feature, it’s a reasonable assumption that VPNs will likely be next on the chopping block, given that Private Relay offers many of the same benefits.

    Successfully blocking Private Relay — let alone if the carriers target VPNs next — will significantly undermine many users’ privacy and security online.

    Second, if the EU Commission gives in and blocks Private Relay, it will essentially confirm the right of companies to mine at least some datafrom paying customers, regardless of whether the customer agrees to it.

    As we have written about before, it’s one thing for the provider of a free service to mine data from their customers. Since they’re providing a service for free, profiting from the customer’s data is often the accepted trade-off.

    On the other hand, when a customer is paying for a service, there should be an expectation that’s where the transaction ends — the company provides a service in exchange for a fair amount of money, end of story.

    If the carriers are successful in their goals, it will set a dangerous precedent that will erode privacy for everyone.

  • Alphabet CEO Pichai Cannot Avoid Testifying in Privacy Suit

    Alphabet CEO Pichai Cannot Avoid Testifying in Privacy Suit

    A federal judge has ruled that Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai can be questioned in a lawsuit over the company allegedly tracking users unlawfully.

    Like many web browsers, Google Chrome has an “Incognito” mode. Typically, “Private” or “incognito” mode means the browser will not track a user’s activity, and the company behind the browser will not have access to any information about what the user is looking at.

    In the case of Chrome, however, Google is accused of continuing to track users, even when Incognito mode was activated. According to Reuters, Pichai was warned in 2019 that Chrome’s Incognito mode could cause problems, given the company described the feature as “private.” Despite the warning, the company continued, since Pichai reportedly didn’t want Incognito mode “under the spotlight.”

    Google has clarified that its Incognito mode only means browsing data is not stored locally, but the company still tracks the activity. Needless to say, this definition is not what users expect, nor is it the industry standard.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in San Jose, California, has ruled that Picahai can be questioned, for up to two hours, since “a few documents establish that specific relevant information was communicated to, and possibly from, Pichai.”

    The development is good news for privacy advocates, and not so good news for Google.

  • DuckDuckGo Reveals Details About Upcoming Desktop Web Browser

    DuckDuckGo Reveals Details About Upcoming Desktop Web Browser

    DuckDuckGo has revealed details about its upcoming desktop web browser, a new entry that promises to offer significant privacy protections.

    DuckDuckGo has made a name for itself as a search engine that protects user privacy and security. The company has been branching out into application development, offering mobile apps and desktop browser plugins that further support its mission.

    The company is now working on its own desktop web browser that will further protect user privacy.

    Like we’ve done on mobile, DuckDuckGo for desktop will redefine user expectations of everyday online privacy. No complicated settings, no misleading warnings, no “levels” of privacy protection – just robust privacy protection that works by default, across search, browsing, email, and more. It’s not a “privacy browser”; it’s an everyday browsing app that respects your privacy because there’s never a bad time to stop companies from spying on your search and browsing history.

    One of the benefits of DuckDuckGo’s browser is that it will use the default rendering engine of its host platform, rather than creating yet another fork of Chrome.

    Instead of forking Chromium or anything else, we’re building our desktop app around the OS-provided rendering engines (like on mobile), allowing us to strip away a lot of the unnecessary cruft and clutter that’s accumulated over the years in major browsers. With our clean and simple interface combined with the beloved Fire Button from our mobile app, DuckDuckGo for desktop will be ready to become your new everyday browsing app. Compared to Chrome, the DuckDuckGo app for desktop is cleaner, way more private, and early tests have found it significantly faster too!

    DuckDuckGo’s entry into the market is an exciting development for anyone concerned with protecting their online privacy.

  • UK May Sentence Execs to Jail Time for Their Platform’s ‘Crimes’

    UK May Sentence Execs to Jail Time for Their Platform’s ‘Crimes’

    Regulators in the UK are taking the gloves off, considering legislation that would impose jail time for execs whose platforms are guilty of “crimes.”

    Social media and online platforms are increasingly under scrutiny around the world for their role in abusing user privacy, interfering in politics, endangering minors and spreading misinformation. Regulators have been struggling to come up with solutions that will effect change, with little results so far.

    According to Gizmodo, UK regulators have proposed adding penalties to the Online Safety Bill that could land executives in jail if their platforms are found to be causing “online harm.” The recommendations were made by Ofcom, the parliamentary group that oversees the telco and broadcasting industry.

    Unfortunately for tech companies, the bill has been accused of being so broad that it could encompass virtually anything thought to be “harmful,” with little clear guidelines of what that may be. The bill would also penalize any website that allows individuals to post content and/or interact with each other online, not just the Big Tech platforms. Ofcom does seem to address some of this, recommending more narrow definitions of what “online harm” may be covered.

    Whatever the outcome, if the bill becomes law it will have profound implications for how companies do business in the UK.

  • iOS/iPadOS 15.2 Released With Major Privacy and Security Fixes

    iOS/iPadOS 15.2 Released With Major Privacy and Security Fixes

    Apple has just dropped iOS and iPadOS 15.2, and it includes 38 privacy and security improvements, and should be a top priority for all users.

    iOS/iPadOS 15.2 includes privacy and security fixes for several sections of the mobile operating system (OS), including the kernel, audio frameworks, FaceTime, I/O frameworks, Notes, Preferences, sandboxing and the Webkit engine that powers Safari.

    All users should download and install 15.2 immediately. To update, open Settings > General > Software Update.

  • Mozilla to Pass $500 Million in 2021 As Other Services Take Off

    Mozilla to Pass $500 Million in 2021 As Other Services Take Off

    Mozilla is closing in on a major milestone, set to pass $500 million in 2021 revenue as the company’s other services gain ground.

    Mozilla has always been in a unique and precarious position. The organization is responsible for one of the most important pieces of software, in its Firefox web browser. Although Chrome has long-since come to dominate the browser market, Firefox consistently wins praise for its focus on user privacy, unlike Chrome. In fact, Mozilla has established itself as a stalwart defender of user privacy, and is on the forefront of such efforts.

    Despite its importance, and what the company stands for, Mozilla’s primary financial support has come from search deals with Google, to the tune of nearly 90% of the company’s revenue. Relying on its greatest competitor, one whose values are almost diametrically opposed to Mozilla’s, is a dangerous position to depend on.

    According to TechCrunch, the status quo is finally starting to change. While Mozilla reported $466 million in search revenue in 2020, and $465 million in 2019, the organization is set to pass $500 million in 2021.

    Most significantly, however, an increasing share of Mozilla’s revenue is coming from its other services, such as Mozilla VPN, Pocket and Firefox Relay Premium. In fact, revenue from these other services is expected to grow 150% in 2020, accounting for 14% of Mozilla’s total revenue. According to TechCrunch, Mozilla’s VPN service alone saw a 450% revenue growth from 2020 to 2021.

    While 14% is still a relatively small portion of Mozilla’s total revenue, it’s an excellent start toward finally breaking free of dependence on Google.

  • Facebook, Google, Snap and Others Bypassing Apple’s Privacy Features

    Facebook, Google, Snap and Others Bypassing Apple’s Privacy Features

    New reports are demonstrating that some of the biggest iOS app makers are bypassing Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) privacy settings.

    Apple introduced ATT in an effort to provide users more control over their data, forcing companies to ask for permission before tracking their activity across websites and services. Theoretically, if a user asks an app not to track them, the app is supposed to respect the user’s wishes.

    Unfortunately, it appears some of the biggest platforms are ignoring users’ wishes and tracking them anyway. Facebook (no real surprise there), Google (again, no big surprise), Snap and others are using a loophole to get around Apple’s requirements.

    According to AppleInsider, the loophole involves the definition of “linking.” Apple’s ATT guidelines say that companies cannot track users and link “user or device data” to apps and services. The guidelines, however, do not specifically spell out what’s involved in “linking.” Companies are using this loophole to collect data, data that can then be used however they want at a later date.

    It’s unclear whether Apple is intentionally turning a blind eye to this behavior, or has simply not decided on an appropriate response yet. The company has previously warned that companies trying to skirt or bypass ATT would risk being banned from the App Store. At the same time, Cupertino’s silence is leaving many to wonder just how much Apple knows and/or is willing to tolerate.

    Hopefully the company cracks down on this behavior and reaffirms users’ right to control their own data.

  • EFF: Google Chrome’s ‘Manifest V3 is Deceitful and Threatening’

    EFF: Google Chrome’s ‘Manifest V3 is Deceitful and Threatening’

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is calling out Google’s Manifest V3 (MV3) browser extension plans, calling them “deceitful and threatening.”

    MV3 represents a significant change to how Chrome browser extensions are implemented. In an effort to increase compatibility, Mozilla has already announced that Firefox will adopt MV3 too.

    According to the EFF, however, MV3 represents a major threat to privacy and security, thanks to the limits it places on how extensions work.

    Manifest V3, or Mv3 for short, is outright harmful to privacy efforts. It will restrict the capabilities of web extensions—especially those that are designed to monitor, modify, and compute alongside the conversation your browser has with the websites you visit. Under the new specifications, extensions like these– like some privacy-protective tracker blockers– will have greatly reduced capabilities. Google’s efforts to limit that access is concerning, especially considering that Google has trackers installed on 75% of the top one million websites.

    The EFF aren’t the only ones warning about MV3.

    “A web browser is supposed to act on behalf of the user and respect the user’s interests,” says Jonathan Mayer, Princeton University. “Unfortunately, Chrome now has a track record as a Google agent, not a user agent. It is the only major web browser that lacks meaningful privacy protections by default, shoves users toward linking activity with a Google Account, and implements invasive new advertising capabilities. Google’s latest changes will break Chrome privacy extensions, despite academic research demonstrating that no change is necessary. These user-hostile decisions are all directly attributable to Google’s surveillance business model and enabled by its dominance of the desktop browser market.”

    “Nearly all browser extensions as you know them today will be affected in some way: the more lucky ones will ‘only’ experience problems, some will get crippled, and some will literally cease to exist,” writes AdGuard’s Andrey Meshkov.

    It’s unlikely Google will back down from its MV3 plans, given how much it relies on the very kinds of trackers many privacy extensions are designed to combat. Hopefully, however, Mozilla will rethink its adoption of MV3, given the company’s commitment to privacy and security.

  • WhatsApp Adds Default Disappearing Messages

    WhatsApp Adds Default Disappearing Messages

    WhatsApp has taken an important step toward improving privacy, giving users the option of sending disappearing messages by default.

    WhatsApp introduced disappearing messages last year, but the feature had to be manually enabled for each new chat. The company is now providing a way for users to enable disappearing messages by default.

    The new feature was announced in a blog post.

    Today we are excited to provide our users with more options to control their messages and how long they stick around, with default disappearing messages and multiple durations.

    WhatsApp users will now have the option to turn on disappearing messages by default for all new chats. When enabled, all new one-on-one chats you or another person start will be set to disappear at your chosen duration, and we’ve added a new option when creating a group chat that lets you turn it on for groups you create. This new feature is optional and does not change or delete any of your existing chats.

    The move is a welcome one, and significantly improves the chat platform’s privacy and security.

  • Verizon Violates User Privacy in the Name of ‘Personalization’

    Verizon Violates User Privacy in the Name of ‘Personalization’

    Verizon’s latest feature is little more than a massive, privacy-killing data grab, sold under the banner of ‘personalization.’

    Verizon is the latest company that no longer seems content with charging a premium for a service, and instead wants to grab as much data from its users as possible in order to profit from that as well. In a recent email to customers, first noticed by Input, the company announced its “Verizon Custom Experience” program.

    The company says the program is designed to “personalize our communications with you, give you more relevant product and service recommendations, and develop plans, services and offers that are more appealing to you.”

    There’s only one problem: In order to “personalize” customer experiences, Verizon wants access to customers’ browsing history, app usage, location, and everyone a customer texts or calls. While it could be argued that, as a wireless provider, Verizon already has access to text and calling contacts, as well as location, there’s absolutely no reason the company should be accessing customers’ web browsing history or app usage.

    To make matters even worse, Verizon automatically enrolls customers in its new program, meaning they have to manually opt out in order to protect their privacy. To do so, customers open the My Verizon app and disable “Custom Experience” and “Custom Experience Plus” under “Privacy Settings.”

    Verizon should be ashamed for such a thinly veiled attempt to monetize its customers in such a manner. The company has a long-standing reputation of being among the most expensive US wireless carriers, specifically because it supposedly offers a premium experience for its customers.

    One would think that respecting and protecting its customers’ privacy would part of that premium service, instead of greedily trying to mine and profit from their data.

  • UK Takes Aim at Adtech, Warns Against Unlawful Behavior

    UK Takes Aim at Adtech, Warns Against Unlawful Behavior

    Elizabeth Denham, the UK’s information commissioner, has penned a piece on the adtech market, warning against unlawful behavior.

    Adtech has becoming an increasingly controversial business model. No longer content to simply offer and sell goods or services for a fair price, companies have built entire businesses around treating their customers as the product, mining every last bit of data about them — whether they like it or not. Some companies are pushing back with privacy-oriented services, such as Apple’s App Tracking Transparency or DuckDuckGo’s App Tracking Protection for Android.

    Denham is throwing her weight into the dispute, calling out the adtech market for unlawful behavior that doesn’t take consumer choice and privacy into account.

    As organisations continue to evolve their proposals, the Commissioner believes that market participants should develop solutions that are focused on the interests, rights and freedoms of the individual. These should move away from intrusive tracking technologies that may continue to pose risks and struggle to comply with the law. 

    While Denham acknowledges there are multiple ways to address the issues moving forward, she emphasizes that any path forward must be a departure from current practices.

    Participants should note that continued use of intrusive online tracking practices is not the right way to develop solutions. Anything that essentially results in a continuation of existing practices will not meaningfully change the status quo. 

    Industry must recognise the need for change. It should understand that the Commissioner does not advocate for alternatives that use the same fundamentally flawed approaches.

    It’s refreshing to see an official take such a strong stance against an industry that has devolved into near-parasite practices that ignore the privacy and security of its users.

  • China Cracking Down on Exporting Customer Data Internationally

    China Cracking Down on Exporting Customer Data Internationally

    China is cracking down on exporting customer data internationally, requiring that companies get the government’s permission first.

    China has been cracking down on its tech companies in recent months. The video game industry has been particularly hard hit, with Beijing limiting how many hours per week kids can play games.

    According to the AP, in its latest efforts Beijing is restricting how much data companies can collect about their customers.

    A separate law that takes effect Monday establishes security standards, prohibits companies from disclosing information without customer permission and tells them to limit how much they collect. Unlike data protection laws in Western countries, the Chinese rules say nothing about limiting government or ruling Communist Party access to personal information.

    Companies will also have to report what and how much customer information they plan to transfer internationally, as well as what security measures have been implemented to protect the data. Regulators will decide within a week of a report whether to accept and approve it, or whether to launch their own review. If the regulators decide to initiate a review, the process can take up to 60 days.

    The new regulations could put Chinese companies at a major disadvantage when competing globally.

  • Apple’s Craig Federighi a Keynote Speaker at Web Summit 2021

    Apple’s Craig Federighi a Keynote Speaker at Web Summit 2021

    Apple’s Craig Federighi has been selected as the keynote speaker for the Web Summit 2021 next week.

    Federighi is Apple’s SVP of Software Engineering, and a staple of the company’s WWDC and product-reveal events. Given his role overseeing Apple’s software, he’s a natural fit for the Web Summit 2021 keynote on user privacy and security.

    The conference’s website was updated with the announcement:

    Apple’s SVP of software engineering, Craig Federighi, delivers a keynote address on user privacy and product security.

    Federighi’s keynote is scheduled for Wednesday, November 3.

  • Google and Facebook Teamed Up to Combat Apple’s Privacy Push

    Google and Facebook Teamed Up to Combat Apple’s Privacy Push

    Attorneys general are accusing Google and Facebook of teaming up to thwart Apple’s efforts to protect user privacy.

    If there was ever any doubt about which companies abuse user privacy, attorneys general from 12 states are putting that issue to rest, accusing Facebook and Google of trying to subvert Apple’s privacy protections. Apple introduced App Tracking Transparency as part of iOS/iPadOS 14.5. The new feature is designed to make it harder for advertisers to track users.

    According to Business Insider, Google and Facebook agreed to work together to thwart Apple’s efforts, and continue tracking users, and then work together if their pact should come under scrutiny.

    “The companies have been working together to improve Facebook’s ability to recognize users using browsers with blocked cookies, on Apple devices, and on Apple’s Safari Browser,” the complaint states. “Thereby circumventing one Big Tech company’s efforts to compete by offering users better privacy.”

    The complaint accuses Facebook of being more culpable, baiting Google into helping it.

    Despite recent missteps, Apple still has a well-earned reputation for trying to protect privacy, including against its Big Tech competitors. The latest accusations by the 12 attorneys general are merely the latest evidence of what many users have long-known: Google and (especially) Facebook give token service to privacy while profiting off of every scrap of data they can collect about their users.

  • Study Shows Android Has Serious Privacy Issues, Snoops on Users

    Study Shows Android Has Serious Privacy Issues, Snoops on Users

    A new study is showing just how much Android snoops on its users, transmitting large quantities of data to third-parties and Google.

    In the age-old iOS vs Android debate, the common argument against Android is the perceived lack of privacy. A team of researchers at the University of Edinburgh and Trinity College Dublin attempted to get to the bottom of the situation, and their findings were disturbing, to say the least.

    The researchers looked phones made by Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi and Realme. They also looked at two forks of the Android OS, LineageOS and /e/OS. At its heart, Android is an open source OS where anyone is free to modify it for their own uses, just as Google does. LineageOS and /e/OS are two such forks that place an emphasis on privacy by “de-Googling” the OS.

    The researchers found that, with one exception, all flavors of Android transmitted substantial data to Google. Even worse, they also transmitted data to third-party companies, including Facebook.

    We find that, with the notable exception of e/OS, even when minimally configured and the handset is idle these vendor-customized Android variants transmit substantial amounts of information to the OS developer and also to third-parties (Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Facebook etc) that have pre-installed system apps. While occasional communication with OS servers is to be expected, the observed data transmission goes well beyond this and raises a number of privacy concerns.

    Here’s a detailed list of the information being sent:

    Table of Android Data Sharing - Credit University of Edinburgh & Trinity College Dublin
    Table of Android Data Sharing – Credit University of Edinburgh & Trinity College Dublin

    The researchers also expressed concern about the possibility of companies being able to cross-link data in an effort to build a more comprehensive profile of the user.

    We find that typically multiple parties collect data from a handset. For example, on a Samsung handset Samsung, Google and Microsoft/LinkedIn all collect data. That raises the question of whether the data collected separately by these parties can be linked together (and of course combined with data from other sources). While we are not in a position to know whether such linking actually takes place, by inspection of the identifiers jointly collected by the parties we can see whether the potential exists for data linking.

    Potential for Android Data Cross-Linking - Credit University of Edinburgh & Trinity College Dublin
    Potential for Android Data Cross-Linking – Credit University of Edinburgh & Trinity College Dublin

    Overall, the researchers said the current situation raises serious concerns about the privacy Android offers — or doesn’t.

    We present an in-depth analysis of the data sent by the Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Realme, LineageOS and /e/OS variants of Android. We find that, with the notable exception of e/OS, even when minimally configured and the handset is idle these vendor-customized Android variants transmit substantial amounts of information to the OS developer and also to third-parties (Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Facebook etc) that have pre-installed system apps. While occasional communication with OS servers is to be expected, the observed data transmission goes well beyond this and raises a number of privacy concerns.

    Google has been working to improve its image as a company that respects its users’ privacy. Creating an OS that serves to vacuum up large quantities of user data — and then sends that data to itself and third-parties companies — falls far short of what the company promises and what users deserve.

  • Cloud Giants Announce ‘Trusted Cloud Principles’

    Cloud Giants Announce ‘Trusted Cloud Principles’

    Microsoft, Amazon and Google have announced “Trusted Cloud Principles,” an industry initiative aimed at protecting customer rights in the cloud.

    With the rise of cloud computing, there are a number of issues that cloud companies and regulators are grappling with, not the least of which is privacy. Different jurisdictions have different privacy laws and requirements, making it a challenge for cloud companies to do business internationally.

    The three largest cloud providers — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — have created a set of Trusted Cloud Principles designed to help govern how cloud companies should operate. The initiative also has the support of Atlassian, Cisco, IBM, Salesforce and Slack.

    Through this initiative we seek to partner with governments around the world to resolve international conflicts of law that impede innovation, #security, and #privacy, and to establish and ensure basic protections for organizations that store and process data in the #cloud. Through this initiative, we commit to working with governments to ensure the free flow of data, to promote public safety, and to protect privacy and data security in the #cloud.

    The initiative’s website clearly outlines the group’s mission statement:

    Trusted Cloud Principles signatories are committed to protecting the rights of our customers. We have agreed to strong principles that ensure we compete while maintaining consistent human rights standards.

  • Venmo Redesigns App to Remove Global Payments Feed

    Venmo Redesigns App to Remove Global Payments Feed

    Venmo has redesigned its app to remove the global payments feed, after a high-profile incident in which President Biden’s account was discovered.

    Venmo is the digital payment app owned by PayPal. A key component of Venmo’s popularity is its social component. Users can see each other’s transactions in a social media-style feed. In previous versions of the app, it was even possible to see the transactions of strangers in the global feed.

    Unfortunately for the company, it was extremely easy to find President Biden’s account, leading it to make changes. The new app redesign completely ditches the global feed.

    Venmo has always been social at its core, designed to be a place where friends can split and share payments and experiences. As part of our ongoing efforts to continually evolve the Venmo platform, while staying true to the heart of the Venmo experience, we are removing the global feed, and the friends feed is now the only social feed that will appear in the app. The Venmo community has grown to more than 70 million customers, so this change allows customers to connect and share meaningful moments and experiences with the people who matter most. 

    The move is a welcome one, as far as privacy advocates are concerned, and brings the app a little more into the mainstream.

  • WWW Inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee Joins ProtonMail Advisory Board

    WWW Inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee Joins ProtonMail Advisory Board

    Sir Tim Berners-Lee, known for inventing the World Wide Web and the first web browser, has joined ProtonMail’s advisory board.

    ProtonMail, despite recent controversy, is one of the most private and secure email platforms available, featuring full end-to-end encryption. While Sir Tim Berners-Lee may be best known for inventing the web, in recent years he’s become a staunch privacy advocate, making him a natural fit for ProtonMail.

    The company made the announcement on their blog:

    We are proud and humbled to announce that Sir Tim Berners-Lee, a fellow former scientist from the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and the inventor of the World Wide Web, will be joining Proton’s advisory board.

    Our vision is to build an internet where privacy is the default by creating an ecosystem of services accessible to everyone, everywhere, every day. It is what drives everything we do, from our development of transparent and encrypted services to our advocacy for better data protection laws.

    “I’m delighted to join Proton’s advisory board and support Proton on their journey. I am a firm supporter of privacy, and Proton’s values to give people control of their data are closely aligned to my vision of the web at its full potential,” said Sir Tim.

  • LAPD Collects Everyone’s Social Media Data and Social Security Numbers

    LAPD Collects Everyone’s Social Media Data and Social Security Numbers

    The LAPD has instructed officers to collect social media data and social security numbers on everyone they stop.

    The LAPD is one of the largest police departments in the US. As a result, the actions it takes have a profound impact on countless individuals. The department also has a long track record of police misconduct and controversy, including civil rights violations.

    In fact, the department’s behavior led the DOJ to threaten a civil suit over the LAPD’s long history of abuses. To avoid the suit, the LAPD entered into a Civil Rights Consent Decree with the DOJ in 2001. While such legally binding decrees last a minimum of five years, this particular decree lasted until 2013, when the DOJ was satisfied enough changes had taken place.

    According to The Guardian, however, the LAPD is once again engaging in disturbing behavior. Documents obtained by the Brennan Center for Justice show that the LAPD has instructed its officers to collect the social media information of everyone they stop — including individuals who have neither been arrested, nor charged with a crime.

    The department evidently added the line for social media accounts on its field interview cards in 2015. In a memo to employees, Chief Michael Moore said the data was critical to aid in “investigations, arrests, and prosecutions.” 

    According to the Brennon Center, none of the other 40 police departments the organization checked with called for its officers to collect such information.

    “There are real dangers about police having all of this social media identifying information at their fingertips,” Rachel Levinson-Waldman, a deputy director at the Brennan Center, told The Guardian.

    To make matters worse, LAPD officers are instructed to collect individuals’ social security numbers, telling them federal law requires it.

    The revelation is drawing condemnation from critics, including Kathleen Kim. Kim is “a Loyola law professor and immigrants’ rights expert, who previously served on the LA police commission.”

    Kim said she was unaware of any legal requirement that individuals provide their social security number and was shocked at the news. She said the policy was “so antithetical to the department’s own policies.”

    It’s a safe bet the LAPD may once again find itself at the center of some well-deserved scrutiny by the DOJ.

  • Apple Delays CSAM Scanning Amid Backlash

    Apple Delays CSAM Scanning Amid Backlash

    Apple has announced it is delaying its plans to implement CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) scanning amid backlash from all sides.

    Apple previously announced plans to implement CSAM scanning in the next versions of iOS, iPadOS and macOS. While many companies, including Microsoft, Google, Dropbox and Facebook, all scan their servers for CSAM, Apple’s solution was unique in that part of the process would take place on-device.

    The backlash was immediate and severe, leading Apple to try to explain how the system worked. Ultimately, it has not been successful assuaging people’s concerns and is now delaying the feature, according to a statement on its website.

    Update as of September 3, 2021: Previously we announced plans for features intended to help protect children from predators who use communication tools to recruit and exploit them and to help limit the spread of Child Sexual Abuse Material. Based on feedback from customers, advocacy groups, researchers, and others, we have decided to take additional time over the coming months to collect input and make improvements before releasing these critically important child safety features.

    Unfortunately, Apple’s statement is small comfort, as many have pointed out that any attempt to continue with the original goal is extremely dangerous. In our upcoming multi-part breakdown of Apple’s plans, we’ll explain why.