WebProNews

Tag: police misconduct

  • IBM Ends Its Facial Recognition Business

    IBM Ends Its Facial Recognition Business

    IBM CEO Arvind Krishna has written Congress to inform them the company no longer offers general purpose facial recognition and analysis software.

    Krishna wrote the letter in the context of responsible use of technology, such as facial recognition, on the part of law enforcement. The letter is a direct response to the death of George Floyd and others, as well as the accusations of police brutality that have led to mass protests. Channeling IBM’s long history of support for civil rights, Krishna cited the letter Thomas J. Watson, Jr., then president of IBM, sent to employees in 1953, vowing to hire individuals who were qualified, “regardless of race, color or creed.”

    Krishna encourages Congress to enact laws to tackle police misconduct, including a federal registry that would track instances. The letter also asks Congress to review and revisit use-of-force policies, as well as the qualified immunity police officers enjoy.

    The letter also makes clear that IBM will do its part to prevent its technology from being used in a way that is inconsistent with the company’s values. Krishna writes:

    IBM no longer offers general purpose IBM facial recognition or analysis software. IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and Principles of Trust and Transparency. We believe now is the time to begin a national dialogue on whether and how facial recognition technology should be employed by domestic law enforcement agencies.

    Artificial Intelligence is a powerful tool that can help law enforcement keep citizens safe. But vendors and users of Al systems have a shared responsibility to ensure that Al is tested for bias, particularity when used in law enforcement, and that such bias testing is audited and reported.

    Finally, national policy also should encourage and advance uses of technology that bring greater transparency and accountability to policing, such as body cameras and modern data analytics techniques.

    The move is a bold one for IBM, as facial recognition is already proving to be a valuable technology. In the wake of recent events, however, it’s likely IBM won’t be the only company to take such a stand.

  • Danziger Bridge Convictions: New Trial Ordered

    Two years ago, five former New Orleans police officers were found guilty on charges of crimes against civil rights and using a weapon in a crime of violence after shooting and killing two unarmed citizens during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. On Wednesday, however, a federal court overturned the convictions and ordered a new trial for the former police officers involved in the Danziger Bridge shootings.

    The families of the victims, 17-year-old James Brissette and mentally disabled 40-year-old Ronald Madison, were devastated after hearing about the decision. Sherrel Johnson, the mother of the teenager Brissette, was shocked. “Is my son going to get a new lease on life? Is he coming back? What about the mental anguish that these people put us through?” Johnson asked. “It is not fair to make us sit through that again.”

    Witnesses said that after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, several police officers used shotguns and assault rifles to open fire on unarmed citizens on Danziger Bridge. In addition to the two men who died, four others were shot on the bridge.

    The men involved, Sgt. Kenneth Bowen, Sgt. Robert Gisevius, Officer Anthony Villavaso and Officer Robert Faulcon, eventually turned themselves in following complaints. It took years to build the case against the police officers involved in the Danziger Bridge shootings, as the indictments were originally dismissed. The Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI investigated the case and filed charges.

    U.S. District Court Judge Kurt Englehardt made his decision on Wednesday because of the actions of the prosecutors involved. Three government attorneys posted “inflammatory” comments about the case online. The attorneys involved are U.S. prosecutors Sal Perricone, Jan Mann and Karla Dobinski, plus former U.S. Attorney Jim Letten. Englehardt wasn’t happy about ordering a new trial, but thought it was necessary because of “grotesque prosecutorial misconduct.”

    One of the federal prosecutors in the Danziger Bridge shootings posted the following comments online while the case was in progress:

    “NONE of these guys should had have [sic] ever been given a badge,” the commenter, identified only as “legacyusa,” wrote. “We should research how they got on the police department, who trained them, who supervised them and why were they ever been promoted. You put crap in–you get crap out!!!”

    Do you think the Danziger Bridge convictions should have been overturned and a new trial ordered? Add your comments below.

    Many people on Twitter were shocked after the ruling was announced.

    Image via YouTube