WebProNews

Tag: Petition

  • MPAA Responds to “Bully” Petition

    MPAA Responds to “Bully” Petition

    A little while ago we brought you a story about a petition asking the MPAA to reconsider its R rating of the documentary Bully. The film, which explores the problem of bullying in American schools, narrowly missed receiving the PG-13 rating that its makers wanted. The Weinstein Company, which produced the film, argued that the R rating would prevent many of the kids who most need to see it from doing so. Many movie theaters do not allow kids under 17 to see an R-rated movie without an adult, and many schools will not screen R-rated films, regardless of subject matter.

    As part of the previous story, I sent the MPAA a request for comment. I asked about the organization’s response to the petition, and to the claim that the R rating would keep some kids from seeing the movie. They had not responded by the time the original story ran, less than an hour later I received the following statement, credited to Joan Graves, head of the Classification and Ratings Administration:

    Bullying is a serious issue and is a subject that parents should discuss with their children. The MPAA agrees with the Weinstein Company that Bully can serve as a vehicle for such important discussions. Unfortunately, there is a misconception about the R rating of this film limiting the audience to adults. This is not true. In fact, many other R-rated movies on important topics, such as Schindler’s List, have been screened in schools and viewed by children accompanied by their parents.

    The voluntary ratings system enables parents to make an informed decision about what content they allow their children to see in movies. The R rating and description of “some language” for Bully does not mean that children cannot see the film. As with any movie, parents will decide if they want their children to see Bully. School districts, similarly, handle the determination of showing movies on a case-by-case basis and have their own guidelines for parental approval.

    The R rating is not a judgment on the value of any movie. The rating simply conveys to parents that a film has elements strong enough to require careful consideration before allowing their children to view it. Once advised, many parents may take their kids to see an R-rated film.

    What do you think of the MPAA’s response? Should kids be allowed to see this movie without their parents? Let us know what you think in the comments.

  • Online Petition Asks MPAA To Change “Bully” Rating

    Online Petition Asks MPAA To Change “Bully” Rating

    When the MPAA gave director Lee Hirsch’s documentary Bully an R rating, Harvey Weinstein was angry. Weinstein is co-chairman of The Weinstein Company, which is distributing the film. Bully is a documentary dealing with, as you might guess from the title, the issue of bullying in American schools. The film is meant to give a realistic picture of the problem. As such it includes a fair amount of violence and the kind of language that teenagers use when grown-ups aren’t around.

    It was this language – not the violence – that prompted the MPAA to slap the film with an R rating instead of the PG-13 rating TWC wanted. TWC appealed the decision. Weinstein himself, along with one of the boys featured in the film, Alex Libby, asked the MPAA to change the rating. Since the movie is aimed at teenagers, an R rating will prevent many of the very kids at whom the film is targeted from seeing it. Not only will it prevent many movie theaters from letting kids under 17 in without an adult, it will also prevent TWC from holding many of its planned screenings of the film at middle and high schools. The appeal came one vote shy of the two-thirds majority required to overturn a rating.

    Now it seems that there is an appeal of a different kind. Katy Butler, a high school student in Michigan, has posted a petition to Change.org, asking that the MPAA again reconsider its decision to give the movie an R rating. The petition, which appears to have been filed yesterday, has a target of 150,000 signatures. As of now, Tuesday afternoon, it has over 90,000 signatures.

    I contacted the MPAA about the petition. I asked what their response to the petition would be, and their response to the claim that such a rating would prevent the film’s target audience from seeing it. As of yet they have not responded.

    The petition can be found here. You can also see a trailer for the film below. Check it out, then let us know what you think in the comments.

  • Apple Worker Protection Petition Gains Momentum

    Communications consultant Mark Shields is an Apple products fan who has decided to do something about the abuse claims at Apple supplier Foxconn’s manufacturing facilities in China. He has drafted a petition asking Apple to release a worker protection strategy for all new product releases.

    Shields is asking Apple to continue their motto of “thinking differently” and transfer that mentality over to protecting the laborers who build their products. In the petition he urges Apple to hear his point of view:

    “….I want to continue to use and love the products you make, because they’re changing the world, and have already changed my life. But I also want to know that when I buy products from you, it’s not at the cost of horrible human suffering.”

    Tim Cook, CEO at Apple claims that apple has made great strides in the fight against work place abuse in China, more than anyone else in the industry. He’s outraged about the claims and denies the incidents are the result of any policies at Apple.

    As perceptions of Apple begin to change in the eyes of consumers, Shields reports that his petition has gathered over 162,000 signatures. Perhaps this petition will be a catalyst for change over in Asia but I have my doubts about whether this is anything more than just a fleeting interest for the American public. The recent abuses at Foxconn are just part of a long heritage of exploits by American companies in foreign lands.

    I believe, and so do those who have signed this petition, that every human being is entitled to safe working conditions at the very least. The down side is, I don’t believe the American consumer is willing to sacrifice low costs for improved worker safety. Don’t be fooled, that’s what it will take to make change in this area. Safety costs time and resources; signing pieces of paper will not get the job done. If Tim Cook was being honest, he would admit that improved safety translates to higher costs and that’s something shareholders will not like.

  • ACTA Petition Goes Over 1 Million Signatures

    When AVAAZ.org launched their anti-ACTA petition, their stated goal was 750,000. When WebProNews first discussed the petition, the total number of signatures had eclipsed the 600,000 mark. Now, thanks to a large push back from European Union citizens, AVAAZ has a new goal: 2 million signatures.

    Considering the rate at which the signatures more than doubled from when we previously reported on the petition — in less than a week’s time — it’s clear people don’t want their Internet to be regulated.

    Currently, the Stop ACTA petition is near the 1.5 million mark for signatures, and judging by the speed the “recent signers” list is scrolling at, reaching the 2 million signatures goal is a formality. In fact, it wouldn’t be surprising if the petition exceeded 3 million signatures, as more and more people learn about the potential damages ACTA can cause to an open Internet.

    Word of mouth about AVAAZ’s petition appears to have helped the cause. As of this article, there were 452 thousand Facebook shares, 19 thousand email shares, 66 thousand Twitter shares and 13 thousand on Tumblr’s network. As for AVAAZ’s stance, the petition’s introductory paragraph makes it very clear:

    As concerned global citizens, we call on you to stand for a free and open Internet and reject the ratification of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), which would destroy it. The Internet is a crucial tool for people around the world to exchange ideas and promote democracy. We urge you to show true global leadership and protect our rights.

    If you’d like to sign but haven’t — yes, U.S. residents are welcome, too — make sure you check out AVAAZ’s page.

    There’s plenty of information explaining their position.

  • Minecraft LEGO Set Will Be Officially Released, Thanks to Petition

    Minecraft and Lego’s, they’re like evolutionary cousins. Without Lego’s, there’s a good chance Minecraft would never have come to be. Therefore, it seems all but an inevitability that the two brands would come together to form an alliance, stretching our creative/building muscles even further.

    We can all thank a service from Lego, called ‘Lego CUUSOO‘, where people can share set concepts and rally to have them become a reality. The Lego Minecraft set garnered so much support, over 10,000 signatures, they officially announced the start of product development.

    When you sit and ponder upon this concept, it leaves your mind swirling. For people that play Minecraft, will they buy enough Lego’s to see their virtual creations become reality? As big as Minecraft worlds can get, it seems improbable. However, I bet we’ll see a YouTube creation video soon after the set release.

    Enjoy these concept photos, and get to thinking about how you’ll split your time between Minecraft and Minecraft Lego’s.

    Minecraft Lego's

    Minecraft Lego's 1

    Minecraft Lego's 2