WebProNews

Tag: Meerkat

  • Infographic Compares Meerkat & Periscope For Business

    Infographic Compares Meerkat & Periscope For Business

    Meerkat and Periscope both quickly made names for themselves with their live streaming apps launched earlier this year. A lot of businesses have been testing the waters and trying to figure out which if either (or both) are best for them.

    What are the differences? Is one better for something than the other? Which one should you use? Consider all the information in this infographic from Salesforce (via SocialTimes), and you might get closer to answering these questions for your own business.

    Click To Enlarge

    Meerkat & Periscope: Colonizing the Live Streaming Market

    Via Salesforce

    The CMO of Chariot Solutions and Chief Digital Strategist at Bell Digital Strategies recently shared their thoughts comparing the two services after testing them out at a conference. Read this for some pros and cons they took away from the experience.

    Image via Salesforce

  • Is Facebook Thinking About Taking On Periscope And Meerkat?

    Facebook has been been emailing survey questions to people asking about their experience with Facebook video as well as their experience with Meerkat. This is fueling questions about whether Facebook is considering launching its own Meerkat/Periscope competitor.

    Marketing Land reports that one of its editors received the survey, and shares screencaps of the questions.

    Facebook starts off asking how often the user watches videos, including feature length content, using the following apps or services: Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo, Periscope, Meerkat, YouNow, Twitch, Hulu, and Netflix.

    Then, it asks if they agree with the following statements about the videos they see:

    – Videos on Facebook have high sound quality.
    – Videos on Facebook play smoothly regardless of my connection.
    – Videos on Facebook have high picture quality.
    – Videos on Facebook load quickly.
    – Videos on Facebook have high playback quality.

    Then, there’s a section that says: “We would like to know more about how you use Meerkat. Thinking about your overall use of Meerkat, please indicate how often you encounter the following experiences with the live-stream videos you seen on Periscope.”

    Users get the options: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, and All the Time:

    – Videos I see on Meerkat inform me about day-to-day lives of people living close to me.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat inform me about day-to-day lives of people living in other parts of the country/world.
    – I feel empathy for people when watching videos on Meerkat.
    – I feel connected to the broadcasters of the videos I see on Meerkat.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat inform me about the news or events around the world.
    – I feel connected to the people who comment on the videos I see on Meerkat.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat connect me with people I could not meet otherwise .
    – I feel excited when watching videos on Meerkat.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat expose me to information I cannot get from mainstream media.
    – I feel entertained when watching videos from Meerkat.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat help me connect with people who share the same interests as me.
    – Videos I see on Meerkat give me information I can share with my family and friends.
    – I feel delighted when watching videos on Meerkat.

    Then, users are asked: Considering all the videos you see on Meerkat these days, which of the following types or genres of videos would you like to see more of less of?

    – Live-stream videos of lectures or tutorials
    – Live-stream videos related to my personal interests (e.g. gaming, cooking)
    – Live Q&A sessions with celebrities
    – Live-stream videos of celebrities
    – Live-stream videos of entertainment events (e.g. concerts, festivals)
    – Live-stream videos of people in their day-to-day lives
    – Live-stream videos of athletic events
    – Live-stream videos of newsworthy events (e.g. eyewitness accounts)
    – Live-stream videos from places you are interest in (e.g. major landmarks)
    – Live Q&A sessions with domain experts (e.g. medical professionals).

    Everybody knows that Facebook values video highly these days as it competes with YouTube for video marketing dollars. Facebook certainly wants to continue to improve its own video offerings. If it’s not considering a live-streaming play of some sort, it’s hard to say why they’re asking so many questions about a service that’s completely unrelated to Facebook. Maybe it’s thinking about an acquisition attempt.

    Twitter launched Periscope, its answer to Meerkat, earlier this year. Here’s a timeline of Facebook copying its rivals.

    Image via Periscope

  • Should Your Business Use Meerkat or Periscope?

    Should Your Business Use Meerkat or Periscope?

    Much has been made about the battle between new social live-streaming services Meerkat and Periscope, the latter of which is owned by Twitter. Meerkat gained a lot of early buzz at SXSW before Periscope launched, but Twitter quickly launched Periscope, which it had acquired earlier, once that buzz started to gain ground.

    Have you tried either Meerkat or Periscope? Do you see potential for using either for business? Let us know in the comments.

    Tracey Welson-Rossman, CMO of Chariot Solutions and founder of TechGirlz and Gloria Bell – Chief Digital Strategist at Bell Digital Strategies and Advisory Board Member of TechGirlz tested both apps during the recent ETE Conference, and wrote about their experience, which they shared with WebProNews. The idea was to provide “an actual real world, side-by-side comparison from someone who has a critical need for this technology in their business”.

    We asked Welson-Rossman if she thinks one platform would be better for certain types of streams than the other. In other words, are there certain types of things Meerkat would be more preferable for or others where Periscope might be a better fit?

    “If you have a built-in or targeted audience, Meerkat would work very well,” she tells us. “If you are trying to reach a larger – or new – audience, the Twitter connection makes it easier on Periscope. From a technological standpoint, though, there are no real differences. Reports from people who viewed both streams indicate there was no discernible difference in quality.”

    It certainly does seems like Periscope has the real advantage based on audience potential with Twitter. Asked how Meerkat might be able to counter this, she says, “Our recommendation would be for Meerkat to concentrate on a membership that includes streaming to targeted audiences, closed live-streaming and paid live-streams.”

    On whether or not Meerkat would be better off if it sold to a Twitter rival, she says, “This market is too early to tell. One of the things that makes it exciting is the range of possibilities.”

    According to Welson-Rossman, a small number of people at the conference were using either service.

    Asked if she expects to continue using both services or just one of them, she says, “Again, it is still too early to really decide. We see potential use cases for both. We anticipate seeing more clarification in potential uses over the next six months or so. Defining factors will include quality, adoption and features. We do know that we will be using one or the other for live streaming, after we buy our tripods to save our arm strength.”

    “We recommend people trying both of them and finding what works best for them and their individual needs,” she says.

    In a blog post, the two laid out what they consider to be the pros and cons of each service:

    Meerkat

    Pros:

    – Easy to set up an account
    – Easy to give the stream a name / title
    – Ability to tweet comments in the stream
    – Can schedule a stream
    – Ability to save broadcast
    – Can target smaller, more direct audience because no auto link to Twitter

    Cons:

    – Cannot zoom in or increase volume
    – Need a built-in audience to gain viewers
    – Lack of direct connection to tweet the stream makes it harder to gain audience
    – Hard to manage the chat and hold the phone
    – Need a good cellular or Wi-fi connection to make it work
    – Hard to understand the metrics for viewership during the broadcast and post
    – Lack of documentation on how to use it
    – Really need a tripod for a good recording
    – No post-viewing metrics

    Periscope

    Pros:

    – Setting up the account was easy
    – Ability to save the broadcast
    – Connecting to and broadcasting via Twitter was easy
    – Ability to tweet comments and likes in the stream, but can’t easily add other Twitter names in the tweet
    – Easy to “title” – just like a tweet
    – Direct link to Twitter makes for a larger audience but also more possibility for spam comments

    Cons:

    – Can’t switch between Twitter accounts
    – Can only have one account associated with the app
    – Need a good cellular or Wi-fi connection to make it work
    – Hard to manage the chat and hold the phone
    – Lack of documentation on how to use it
    – Few metrics – post view metrics much easier to see on an iPad
    – Really need a tripod for a good recording

    We recently looked at some data from Socialbakers, which showed Periscope taking a clear lead in terms of number of tweets.

    “Content creators have seemingly switched over to Periscope in terms of the number of live streams they’re tweeting,” a spokesperson for Socialbakers told WebProNews. “This data comes from tweets analyzed from our sample of 25,000 brand, celebrity, entertainment, and media company profiles. We determined Periscope and Meerkat live-streams based on the links in the tweets (We excluded certain extreme outliers that were posting a ton of live streams, but the trend is the same regardless.).”

    “Around March 26th when Periscope launched, these profiles began posting many more Periscope live streams and fewer Meerkat live streams on Twitter,” they added. “Now, the majority of live streams posted are Periscope ones.”

    According to AdAge, brands aren’t rushing to either service which isn’t a very good sign, because brands always rush to everything. It wrote on March 27:

    On March 13 — the first day of SXSW when Meerkat was really catching on — Ad Age pulled the most recent 200 tweets from each of the top 100 brands on Ad Age’s list of the most-advertised brands by U.S. measured-media spending in 2013. That list includes heavy hitters such as AT&T, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Ford and Walmart. None of those tweets contained Meerkat links.

    On March 27, Ad Age ran the same test, this time checking for either Meerkat or Periscope links in the brands’ 200 most recent tweets. Of those 100 brands, none had directly tweeted a link to Periscope, though T-Mobile had retweeted a tweet linking to the app. And three — Verizon, L’Oreal and Intuit — had tweeted a link to Meerkat, including a few retweets.

    Obviously a little time has passed since then, but still, that’s probably not the reaction any new social platform is looking for when it’s starting out. Brands were even rushing to Jelly when that launched.

    Do you think either Periscope or Meerkat (or both) will become a major platform? Tell us what you think.

    Image via Socialbakers

  • Periscope Gaining More Traction Than Meerkat on Twitter

    Since SXSW, much has been made about the competition between Meerkat and Periscope, the two new social live video streaming offerings. The the latter comes directly from Twitter, as the company acquired it before launch.

    Which one is gaining more ground? Well, if new data from Socialbakers is any indication, the edge has gone to Twitter’s own Periscope.

    “Content creators have seemingly switched over to Periscope in terms of the number of live streams they’re tweeting,” a spokesperson for the data provider tells WebProNews. “This data comes from tweets analyzed from our sample of 25,000 brand, celebrity, entertainment, and media company profiles. We determined Periscope and Meerkat live-streams based on the links in the tweets (We excluded certain extreme outliers that were posting a ton of live streams, but the trend is the same regardless.).”

    “Around March 26th when Periscope launched, these profiles began posting many more Periscope live streams and fewer Meerkat live streams on Twitter,” the spokesperson adds. “Now, the majority of live streams posted are Periscope ones.”

    The victor has hardly been decided just yet, however. Both Meerkat and Periscope launched as iOS apps without Android offerings, though that will soon change for both. Twitter said upon the launch of Periscope that an Android app was in the works, but didn’t provide a timeframe. Meerkat just announced a public beta for Android, so it’s at least getting there first, though it got to iOS first too, and that doesn’t seem to have made a huge difference.

    Engadget credits Twitter’s “clout and a better user experience” with helping propel Periscope ahead.

    Interestingly, Periscope hasn’t even been available a month yet, and it’s already getting takedown notices thanks to people live-streaming the Game of Thrones season premiere. This could be an ongoing problem for both apps.

    It may be too early to call Periscope the winner of this emerging space, but it is going to be hard to compete with Twitter on its own turf. If you haven’t tried out Periscope yet, and are thinking about doing so, read this to learn more about its ins and outs.

  • Can Twitter Have Facebook-Like Success With Video?

    Can Twitter Have Facebook-Like Success With Video?

    Video has become huge for Facebook, and Twitter is hoping it can follow a similar path. Autoplay has certainly lent itself well to Facebook’s success, and it sounds like Twitter is about to follow suit.

    While Twitter video is still new to users, the company introduced Promoted Video for advertisers back in August after months of testing a Twitter video card with one-tap viewing. At the time, Twitter said tests showed that tweets containing native Twitter video generate better engagement and more video views than before.

    That engagement is about to become even stronger if a new report from AdWeek is any indication. It says that the company is meeting with top ad execs at SXSW to talk up its video capabilities, and that these talks will “possibly” include an autoplay option. The report, which cites “several marketers scheduled to powwow with Twitter reps,” says:

    Autoplay video is at the top of advertisers’ wish lists for Twitter, according to an agency executive headed to SXSW. Twitter is still working on video that automatically starts in a user’s stream as he or she scrolls down, according to multiple sources.

    Twitter has already launched its native video product. Ad insiders said it still plans to introduce an autoplay option that will enable six-second clips—including preroll ads—to automatically play before the user clicks for the rest of the video, two sources said.

    In December, we heard that Twitter was torn on whether or not to offer up autoplay videos. Since then, however, we’ve learned just how much success Facebook has seen.

    Facebook adopted autopplay videos back in the fall of 2013. In January, the company revealed that the number of video posts per person had increased 75% globally and 94% in the US over the past year, while the amount of video from people and brands in News Feed increased 3.6x year-over-year.

    While you certainly can’t attribute Facebook’s video growth to autoplay alone, you’d have to imagine that it has played a role. When the images are moving, the videos get your attention as you’re scrolling. That’s probably why brands are now posting more Facebook videos than YouTube videos on Facebook. Look at how drastically that has changed over the past year.

    That data is from SocialBakers, which according to the new AdWeek report, also says that while 82% of brands posting videos on Twitter share YouTube clips compared to 16% who share videos from Twitter or Twitter-owned Vine, Twitter and Vine videos account for about 70% of retweets and favorites generated by all video on Twitter. That’s huge for Twitter’s video platforms, and autoplay Twitter videos should only fuel that fire.

    Last month, AdWeek reported that JCPenney’s 4 cent (per view) video ads on Twitter “could threaten YouTube’s longtime dominance”. It shared a comment from the company:

    “Natively placing the video on Twitter offered a seamless way for consumers to view and share the content. That ease of use helped make Twitter the top platform for views,” Sean Ryan, director of social media at JCPenney, wrote in a report about the campaign. “While we could have promoted a link to the video on YouTube, the native placement was much more effective in cost per view.”

    Of course we’re not just talking about promtoed videos here.

    In January, Twitter unleashed its native video offering, enabling iOS users to capture, edit, and share videos from the Twitter app. It has since rolled the feature out on Android.

    “We designed our camera to be simple to use so you can capture and share life’s most interesting moments as they happen,” said product director Jinen Kamdar. “In just a few taps you can add a video to unfolding conversations, share your perspective of a live event, and show your everyday moments instantly, without ever having to leave the app. Viewing and playing videos is just as simple: videos are previewed with a thumbnail and you can play them with just one tap.”

    Twitter has always been about mobile first, but the company should really consider adding the video feature to the desktop web experience as well. It certainly can’t hurt to give users as many ways to use it as possible. Users may wish to record themselves with their web cams or capture video from their screens to share with followers.

    The potential viewability for Twitter video is only going to increase. Last week, Twitter launched video embeds, which will allow Twitter videos to be posted all over the web just like YouTube videos. You could already embed tweets, including tweets with videos in them, but now, Twitter video can be used as a standalone piece of content.

    But that’s only one of the ways viewability is likely to increase. As you may have heard, Twitter and Google have gotten back into bed with each other, and soon, Google will have full access to indexing tweets in real time. Now we’re talking the potential for relevant videos from Twitter to appear highly in Google’s search results almost as soon as they’re posted. This could be particularly effective for breaking news. This by the way, should instantly make Google itself better, provided it executes the deal well.

    A recent study found that even before the deal is implemented, Google appears to be more heavily indexing tweets wit images in them. It stands to reason that it will place some emphasis on video as well.

    Twitter has a well documented issue with user growth, and more search visibility means more people landing on Twitter (which means happier investors). If Twitter video becomes a significant part of this (as it should if Google doesn’t discriminate against it in favor of its own YouTube content – which does seem like a possibility) it should make Twitter’s video views skyrocket.

    Twitter’s improvements to search should also factor heavily into Twitter’s video views making for a more evegreen experience to complement the real-time nature of sharing and consuming on Twitter. In November, Twitter gave users access to every public tweet from the past 8 years with its search feature. Search is of major importance for online video. I’m sure you’ve heard YouTube touted as the second biggest search engine in the world a time or two.

    Still, Twitter will continue to be thought of as a place for real-time information first and foremost, and that will continue to be extended to video. The company just bought a video streaming startup called Pericope, which hasn’t launched yet, but is said to be similar to another streaming app for Twitter that’s gaining popularity – Meerkat.

    The Verge called Meerkat the “little app that’s turning live video into a big deal again.”

    TechCrunch called it “the livestreaming app Twitter should have built.”

    The app lets you start a livestream, tweet the link out and alert your followers of it. The video disappears when it’s over, unless you save it yourself. Between Meerkat, which is suddenly getting a lot of attention, and Twitter’s new acquisition, it’s likely that we’re going to be seeing a lot of livestreaming from tweets.

    Again, it will be interesting to see how this factors into the Google deal.

    If nothing else, video could go a long way toward improving engagement on Twitter, which for many users, has been significantly lackluster.

    Images via Twitter