WebProNews

Tag: medicine

  • Thalidomide Could Relieve Coughing For Patients With a Deadly Lung Disease

    Researchers at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have published findings that indicate thalidomide can significantly reduce the disabling cough seen in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

    IPF is a progressive, fatal lung disease that causes a person’s lungs to become stiff and scarred. This prevents oxygen from getting out of the lungs and into the rest of the body. The cause of the disease is unknown, and about 80,000 people in the U.S. have been diagnosed with it. Most people with IPF have a dry cough for which there is currently no treatment, other than a lung transplant.

    “The constant cough caused by the disease can affect the quality of life in many ways,” said Dr. Maureen Horton, a pulmonary disease specialist and professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine as well as the lead author of the study. “Some no longer go to church or to social gatherings because people think they are infectious. Other patients may have more pronounced urinary incontinence due to the cough, for example, so it has wide-ranging effects.”

    Thalidomide is an anti-inflammatory drug that was used as a sleep aid in the 1950’s. It was also used to treat morning sickness, but was pulled from pharmacy shelves in 1961 after it became clear the medication caused severe birth defects. Though the medication is not banned, it is now prescribed with strict controls. It is most commonly used to treat multiple myeloma and kidney cancer. Johns Hopkins states that the drug had not been studied for treating lung disease before.

    The study, which has been published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, looked at 20 patients over the age of 50. Patients took either low doses of thalidomide or a placebo for three months, were off the medication for two weeks, and then the pills for thalidomide and placebo patients were swapped. “We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of thalidomide in patients with IPF to determine its effectiveness in suppressing cough,” said Horton

    The small study found that patients on thalidomide reported their coughing had decreased about 63% and that their “respiratory-specific quality of life” had improved about 20%.

    “Although the results were significant, this was a small study and we believe that a larger trial is warranted to confirm these promising results and also assess the drug’s impact on the disease itself,” said Horton. “We have some hope that this therapy may be able to slow the progression of IPF, but that would have to be tested in a larger study.”

  • 3D Printers Are Getting Better At Printing Blood Vessels

    3D Printers Are Getting Better At Printing Blood Vessels

    One of the first major medical uses for 3D printers came around a few months ago when researchers discovered that they could print working blood vessels. It was a breakthrough in medical technology and could one day lead to saving more lives through inexpensive means. That same technology has received another massive breakthrough this week that makes it even more appealing.

    Scientists at the University of California, San Diego have been playing around with the idea of printing blood vessels with 3D printers for a while now. Previous efforts in building blood vessels took a long time as the device first had to print out a sugar-based cast and the cover them in stem cells to create the working vessels. The new technology can create blood vessels out of soft hydrogels in seconds.

    The new printing technology is called Dynamic Optical Projection Stereolithography, or DOPsL. The speed at which DOPsL can create blood vessels is a major improvement upon any other medical technology. For now, the scientists want to use the technology to grow and study cells in the laboratory. They could theoretically, however, use it to print biological tissue. In essence, they could grow organs.

    Like most major advancements in 3D printing, the innovation comes from doing away with the idea of starting from scratch. Other methods take so long because they’re laboriously layering materials that can take hours to just create one blood vessel. DOPsL takes a solution of photo-sensitive biopolymers and cells and shines light on them in such a way that layers of solid structure emerge from the solution.

    It’s these kind of innovations that America should start investing more heavily in. Thankfully, this particular project was made possible by a government grant that allocated $30 million to 3D printing. If we want to become a leader in 3D printing, more investment needs to come from not just the government, but interested third-parties as well.

    [Image Source]

  • Scorpion Antivenom Costs Arizona Patients $12,500 Per Vial

    A scorpion antivenom that was cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last month is causing sticker shock for Arizona residents.

    The Arizona Republic, a Phoenix-area newspaper, is reporting that Phoenix hospitals are charging patients as much as $12,467 per vial of the antivenom. With a full treatment calling for three to five vials, medical costs can soar to over $60,000. As The Republic points out, the antivenom is almost always used to prevent more serious treatment for children, the elderly, and others who have bad reactions to scorpion stings. The worst part is, many insurance companies have not yet figured out what a “reasonable price” is for the drug, and so do not yet cover treatment with the drug.

    While doctors and hospitals are complaining about the high cost of the medication, the pharmaceutical industry is saying it’s all part of the high cost of medical care in the U.S. The Republic quotes a doctor who participated in the trials as saying the cost is part of the antivenom’s ‘new drug’ status. The doctor states that patients who forego antivenom treatment due to the cost could end up in the intensive care unit, which is even more expensive.

    Though it is manufactured and has been available in Mexico for years, the antivenom has only recently been approved for use in the U.S. The drug, named Anascorp, was approved by the FDA on back August 3, and is licensed in the U.S. to Rare Disease Therapeutics, Inc.

  • Man Steals Ebola Patient’s Cellphone, Promptly Gets Ebola

    As someone who’s had their cellphone stolen, I can attest to the fact that it really sucks. Right after I realized that the theft had taken place, I immediately began my pleas to the cosmos. “Can this low-down human stain please trip, fall, and break his nose? Pretty please?”

    “Can he get herpes? That’s all that I ask.”

    I’m sure I had plenty of other ill wishes for the thief. But I’m pretty sure I never hoped that he would contract Ebola.

    Apparently that’s just what happened to one cellphone snatcher in Uganda. The country, which is the midst of an outbreak of the virus, has confirmed nearly two dozen cases so far, with a pretty high death rate. And one of the deceased victims had their phone stolen from the isolation ward at the Kagadi Hospital a couple of weeks ago.

    According to the Ugandan Daily Monitor, a 40-year-old man snuck into the ward on August 14th under the guise that he was comforting the many patients. Although he reportedly did comfort some victims, he also took a souvenir on his way out.

    Police began tracking the criminal when he began to use the phone to contact friends, but all of the tracking wasn’t really necessary. Soon, the thief was admitted to the hospital with Ebola-like symptoms.

    According to police, he handed over the phone and confessed to the theft. He is currently undergoing tests and receiving medication.

    Moral of the story: An Ebola ward is no place to go searching for an easy steal. If this isn’t a prime example of karma, I don’t know what is.

    [via TIME]

  • HIV Tests to Become More Routine

    HIV Tests to Become More Routine

    A recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is expected to suggest that HIV screenings become routine. The USPSTF is an independent panel of physicians who are experts in preventive medicine. The task force uses evidence-based medicine to make recommendations about preventive services to primary care physicians. A Reuters report cites anonymous health officials close to the panel as saying the suggestion could change the current procedure, which allows doctors to decide whether to screen a patient for HIV. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as “Obamacare,” insurance companies are required to cover services recommended by the USPSTF.

    While the CDC already advocates HIV testing for nearly all Americans, the USPSTF has stayed cautious on the issue, unsure of whether more testing should become a primary care method. The Reuters report quotes the USPSTF co-chair Dr. Michael LeFevre as stating new evidence has come to light in the last seven years. More specifically, there is now evidence that treating people infected with HIV can help prevent the spread of the Virus.

    Though nowhere near as widespread as in some places, such as Haiti or parts of Africa, HIV still poses a significant health risk to Americans. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1.2 million Americans have HIV, and one-fifth of those people (20%) don’t know they have it. The CDC estimates that 47,129 new cases of HIV were diagnosed in 2010.

    As methods for testing patients for HIV improve and become less expensive, more widespread testing is likely. The FDA just last month approved an over-the-counter HIV test. Dubbed the OraQuick, the test uses an oral swab and takes 30 to 40 minutes to produce results. The test could retail for as little as $60.

  • Malaysia Health Minister Says TPP Is No Good

    TPP is a major cause of concern among those in the tech community. Its expansion of copyright and forcing U.S. copyright law onto other countries is troubling to say the least. It seems that some countries involved in the TPP negotiations are beginning to come to their senses. Malaysia is the latest to say no to the treaty.

    Malaysia Health Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai recently spoke out against TPP and its patent extensions on medicine. He feels that the U.S. is putting other countries’ citizens at risk by making them adopt stricter patent laws. Here’s his statement:

    “We are against the patent extension. According to the agreement, if a medicine is launched in the US, and then three years later it is launched in Malaysia, the patent would start from when it is launched here and not when it was launched earlier in the US. This is not fair.”

    According to Bilaterals, the Malaysia’s current patent on medicines last for 20 years. TPP would increase that to 10 more years. During that time, generic drug companies would not be able to make affordable drugs for those who need them most.

    Liow also slammed TPP because it allows corporations to sue countries over perceived wrongs. In draft versions of the treaty that have been leaked, there are provisions that allow corporations to sue countries that don’t prove to be good investments.

    Regardless of the reasons, countries are beginning to see that TPP does nothing for them. It’s all about empowering the U.S. in trade across the South Pacific.

    We already spoke in length about how TPP is hoping to restrict fair use across all the countries involved in TPP. Not only would it hamper creativity in these countries, it would also hamper their economic growth. The same could be said for the medical patent rules.

    Trade agreements should benefit all of the countries who are involved in the process. Everything we’ve seen about TPP so far indicates that it is only benefitting the U.S. The USTR has an obligation to make sure the U.S. is profitable in its trading, but restricting the economic development of other countries isn’t the way to go.

  • 3D Printer Creates “Magic Arms” For Young Girl

    We’ve been covering 3D printers here for a while now and each new innovation just gets a little more amazing. We’ve also seen a few uses that make us question the technology such as when a hobbyist printed the lower part of a gun. 3D printing is going to run into all sorts of conundrums as it matures, but sometimes we just have to appreciate the little miracles that the technology affords.

    Meet Emma, she’s a two-year-old who was born with arthrogryposis. It’s a terrible condition that limits how much she can move her arms. In fact, she can’t move her arms at all. There are available tools and treatments that could help her move again, but she’s much too young for the currently available technologies. That’s where the 3D printer comes in.

    The doctors and technicians at the Delaware hospital in which Emma visits used a 3D printer to create “a durable exoskeleton with the tiny, lightweight parts she needed.” It’s kind of amazing really. It’s hard to put into words so just watch the video below:

    As Emma grows, she’ll be able to switch to a metal exoskeleton that’s better able to match her size. Until then, a 3D printer is giving her the ability to play and interact with the world just like everybody else. That’s a big deal for anybody, but imagine how happy it must make her.

  • Computer Screens Are Killing Our Eyes Because We Work Too Hard

    Computer Screens Are Killing Our Eyes Because We Work Too Hard

    I think we all know the negative consequences of staring at a screen for too long. It can lead to premature blindness and other eye problems. The only problem is that almost every job today requires a significant amount of time in front of a computer monitor. That screen time is killing our eyes according to a report from the American Academy of Optometry.

    So what should we do about it? Health experts say to reduce our time looking at screens to less than two hours a day. They do, of course, provide the caveat that it’s fine when looking at a screen for work. They do say that you really should get out more while focusing your vision on books and other things.

    Funny enough, the biggest problem that affects our eyes is being productive. People who focus entirely on their work forget some basic eye care like blinking. The average person blinks about 12 to 15 times a minute. When focused on work, a person will blink only four to five times a minute. Since blinking is such an subconscious action, it’s hard to actually force yourself to blink without taking your mind off the current work at hand.

    For better eye health, be sure to sit far away from the screen in a well-lit room. Both of these factors can contribue to poor eye health. It’s hard to sit far away from a computer while at work, but you can distance yourself from the screen. Be sure to keep the lights in the room on as well. The backlight of the computer screen coupled with a dark room is a recipe for early onset blindness.

    I should admit that I don’t wear glasses and I’ve been staring at screens for the better part of 20 years now. My eyes don’t even appear to be getting worse with age, but I know other people who have problems. Ignoring the fact that I’m a mutant, taking care of your eyes in today’s digital age is super important. Until doctors are able to stab us in the eyes with needles to cure various vision problems, it’s best to take care of them.

    [h/t: A Healthier Michigan]

  • Doctors May Soon Be Sticking Needles Into Your Eyes

    I have very few fears in this world, but needles is up there with the big ones. I would rather sit in a room with Steven Spielberg’s most horrific creation, E.T., than spend one second with a needle in my arm. That’s why today’s news of doctors wanting to stick needles into my eye to cure macular degeneration has me kind of tense.

    Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University have shown the potential for delivering medicine to the eyes through microneedles. The needles are less than a millimeter in length and were shown to be injected into the eye of an animal model as a proof of concept.

    If you’re scared, don’t be. The procedure is minimally invasive and will only be used to inject drugs into the front of the eye where they will slide into the back of the eye. Considering that contemporary treatments for many eye problems can’t reach the back without extremely invasive procedures, this has the potential to cure a lot of eye diseases that affect many people.

    “This research could lead to a simple and safe procedure that offers doctors a better way to target drugs to specific locations in the eye,” said Samirkumar Patel, the paper’s first author and a postdoctoral researcher at Georgia Tech when the research was conducted. “The design and simplicity of the microneedle device may make it more likely to be used in the clinic as a way to administer drug formulations into the suprachoroidal space that surrounds the eye.”

    What’s even more amazing is that drugs injected via microneedles revolve around your eye like a satellite to a planet. The drugs revolve around the eye in a part that doesn’t have any negative side effects on the person while delivering drugs to the affected parts of the eye. Researchers will now develop drugs contained in capsules that will biodegrade in the eye while only letting out small amounts of medicine over time. It prevents having to be repeatedly stabbed in the eye over the course of a few months.

    I think we can all agree that this is a good thing, being stabbed in the eye notwithstanding. The eye is one of those body parts that’s really hard to treat due to its fragile nature. This new treatment should save eyesight everywhere. We can at least rest easy knowing that this won’t happen:

  • The Future Of Medicine Is In 3D Printing

    The Future Of Medicine Is In 3D Printing

    We brought you the first potentially negative use of 3D printers this morning with the revelation that one can make rare handcuff keys with a simple 3D printer or laser cutter. The technology is still really cool, but it must be used with great responsibility. Well, there’s another use for 3D printers that has a lot of potential to be abused, but also a lot of potential to save lives.

    The 3D printer revolution has taken hold of Professor Lee Cronin at Glasgow University. He has many interests, but one of his most ambitious involves 3D printers. In an interview with The Guardian, he talks up 3D printers and their potential for revolutionizing the medicine industry. His goal is to create “downloadable chemistry” so that people can print their own medicine at home.

    Of course, you can already see the problem here. Prescription drug abuse is a major problem in many countries, especially in the U.S. Giving people easy access to those drugs is a potential hazard that must be addressed. Cronin dismisses such a scenario and instead focuses on the benefits such an innovation could have on society.

    His team is now trying to build simple drugs with a 3D printer that only costs £1,200. So far, they have been able to build simple inorganic molecules inside reaction chambers. The next step is attempting to create something simple, like Ibuprofen. Cronin notes that if they succeed, they’ll be able to print just about any drug.

    The main benefit, according to Cronin, would be distributing drugs to places that never get them because “the population is not big enough, or not rich enough.” Besides releasing malaria resistant mosquitoes into Africa, Cronin sees 3D printing as an inexpensive way of getting malaria drugs into communities that need it most.

    3D printers are all about democratizing traditional distribution models. Before, we would have to demand an item and then wait for a company to manufacture and distribute said item. 3D printing puts the manufacturing and distribution into the hands of the people. It’s that core concept that drives Cronin to build a 3D printer capable of creating medicine.

    The final quote in The Guardian’s interview with Cronin is quite telling. On the matter of printing medicine, he says, “As well as transforming the industry and making money, we could be saying lives. Why wait?” “Why wait?” is the most important question right now in the 3D printing scene and I hope more people beging to realize that there is no reason to wait.

  • Addicted To Cocaine? New Vaccine Might Help

    Cocaine has always been that drug that I only hear about. I see people using it all the time in film, television and books, but I’ve never met a user in my life. I blame that on growing up in Southeastern Kentucky where meth is the poison of choice. Still, there are people out there addicted to the drug and they want to get off. To stop taking any drug is hard, but a new vaccine might just do the trick for cocaine users.

    Researchers from all over the country published a paper back in May that claims to have found a way to cure cocaine addiction through a single vaccine. It’s a novel approach that could do a lot of good in the world for those suffering from addition or withdrawal. Here’s how the researchers explain their work:

    Cocaine addiction is a major problem affecting all societal and economic classes for which there is no effective therapy. We hypothesized an effective anti-cocaine vaccine could be developed by using an adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer vector as the delivery vehicle to persistently express an anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody in vivo, which would sequester cocaine in the blood, preventing access to cognate receptors in the brain. To accomplish this, we constructed AAVrh.10antiCoc.Mab, an AAVrh.10 gene transfer vector expressing the heavy and light chains of the high affinity anti-cocaine monoclonal antibody GNC92H2. Intravenous administration of AAVrh.10antiCoc.Mab to mice mediated high, persistent serum levels of high-affinity, cocaine-specific antibodies that sequestered intravenously administered cocaine in the blood. With repeated intravenous cocaine challenge, naive mice exhibited hyperactivity, while the AAVrh.10antiCoc.Mab-vaccinated mice were completely resistant to the cocaine. These observations demonstrate a novel strategy for cocaine addiction by requiring only a single administration of an AAV vector mediating persistent, systemic anti-cocaine passive immunity.

    If that went over your head, here’s the simple version – The researchers have found a way to deliver a protein-based gene via virus that bonds to cocaine in the bloodstream. This protein prevents the cocaine from ever reaching the brain, thus stopping the effects of the drug.

    So couldn’t this vaccine be abused by people who would want to take cocaine without the negative side effects? The protein stops all the effects, including the high, thus making cocaine worthless to people who took the vaccine. It would be especially helpful for those trying to quit as they would no longer experience the high that they seek. Of course, there still is the problem that people may turn to other drugs once cocaine loses its splendor.

    Still, this is the kind of innovation that’s needed in the war on drugs. You can have all the law enforcement in the world, but people are still going to do drugs. You win if you can take away the only reason people use the drug in the first place.

    [h/t: Sci-News]

  • Mutant Mosquito May Be The Cure For Malaria

    We brought you word yesterday that Florida residents were up in arms over a British company that intended to release genetically modified mosquitoes into the Keys region. The reason being that these mosquitoes would not be carriers of the particularly nasty Dengue fever. Florida residents were still skeptical and didn’t want any new species released that could damage the ecosystem. Well, there’s a new mutant mosquito on the block, but this one is aimed at Africa.

    It’s no secret that malaria is the number one killer in Africa. Due to lack of cheap vaccines and territorial conflicts, the people who need help the most never get it. Scientists have now found a way that attacks malaria at its source – the mosquito’s stomach.

    Malaria begins its life in the stomach of a mosquito. After biting a human, the parasite can work its way into the bloodstream of a person and begin to wreak havoc on their body. The genius solution is to introduce bacteria into the mosquito that specifically targets malaria. Technology Review explains how it works:

    The malaria parasite, called Plasmodium falciparum, must complete a crucial part of its life cycle within a mosquito’s midgut before it can be transmitted to people. So bacteria in that compartment are well positioned to deliver antimalarial compounds. When the mosquito takes a blood meal—that is, when it bites someone—bacteria in the mosquito’s midgut also proliferate, thanks to the blood nutrients.

    It’s during this stage in the parasite’s life that the bacteria triggered by the proliferation of blood can target the parasite and kill it. In studies performed by the scientists, they found that only 14 to 18 percent of the mosquitoes that were fed the malaria-killing bacteria became infected by the parasite.

    The big question facing the scientists now is how to introduce this new bacteria into the wild. As they point out, people become touchy whenever the subject turns to genetically modified organisms. It has the potential to save a lot of lives, but it can also have adverse side effects. They must do more thorough testing before they can convince local governments that this is a good idea.

  • Alzheimer’s Disease Isn’t Yet Curable, But New Book Helps Treat It

    Alzheimer’s Disease is one of my most hated enemies. I watched as it slowly chipped away at my grandmother’s life and sanity. It’s one of those things that you don’t really think about until it directly affects you. Thankfully, some intrepid doctors have found new ways to making life better for those who have just been diagnosed with the disease.

    The new book is called “Alzheimer’s Treatment, Alzheimer’s Prevention: A Patient and Family Guide.” It’s written by Richard S. Isaacson, M.D., Associate Professor of Clinical Neurology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. The book features tips on how to manage the disease and make it not as bad for family who suffer along with the afflicted during the course of Alzheimer’s.

    “As a physician and someone who has several family members with Alzheimer’s, it’s important I provide as many resources possible to help patients and their families manage this condition,” said Dr. Isaacson. “After seeing success with my own patients, I wrote this book to educate those who I will not get a chance to see in my clinic and may not be aware of all their options.”

    Dr. Isaacson found that changes to one’s diet can help offset the effects of the disease on the brain. There are many foods that are key to brain health and having a steady diet in things like fish can help fight off Alzheimer’s and other brain-related diseases. He also found that certain vitamins help improve memory in patients with mild cognitive impairments.

    Other tips from the book include listening to music and being engaged with musical experiences throughout your life. The uplifting spirit of music can slow down brain aging and memory loss while also releasing chemicals in the brain that affect mood, behavior and sleep.

    While we still haven’t found a cure for Alzheimer’s, there are some simple tips in the book that will help those currently with the disease and those at risk. Heck, it’s good to take care of your brain even when you’re in no such danger.

    [Image Credit: Alzheimer’s Association]

  • They Can Run, But Cancer Cells Can No Longer Hide

    I’ve had friends and family taken by cancer, and the cause was always the same – it was caught too late. Granted, a lot of that has to do with people not getting annual screenings, but cancer is also just really hard to find in its early stages. Couple that with the fact that some cancers can only be treated in the early stages and you have a problem. How do we catch cancer before symptoms even show up?

    A team of researchers at UCLA have created the “world’s fastest camera” that’s able to identify rare breast cancer cells in real-time. What makes it even better is its astounding fale-positive rate of only one in a million cells. The researchers say that being able to find rare cancer cells early can help them prevent the leading cause of cancer spreading throughout the body.

    So, how does this camera work? Let Bahram Jalali, the Northrop Grumman Endowed Opto-Electronic Chair in Electrical Engineering at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, can explain it much better than I can:

    “To catch these elusive cells, the camera must be able to capture and digitally process millions of images continuously at a very high frame rate. Conventional CCD and CMOS cameras are not fast and sensitive enough. It takes time to read the data from the array of pixels, and they become less sensitive to light at high speed.”

    The next logical question would be to ask how fast the camera actually is. The short answer – it’s really fast. The long answer – the camera was integrated with advanced microfluidics and real-time image processing that can screen 100,000 cells per second. It’s 100 times faster than the current standard blood analyzers.

    The team is now testing the camera in collaboration with clinics. If proven successful, the camera will “reduce errors and and costs in medical diagnosis.” It also has the potential to be useful for “urine analysis, water quality monitoring and related applications.”

    Can we start adding super fast cameras to inventions that are amazing? Sure, it’s no 3D printer yet, but these super fast cameras are definitely helping in the field of medicine and general technology. The future is upon us, folks, and it looks bright.

    [Lead image: UCLA]

  • The Amazing History And Future Of Bioprinting [Infographic]

    I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again – 3D printers are amazing. The technological wonder that allows us to create 3D objects simply by scanning them into a computer has the potential to revolutionize everything. There’s even been talks of how to apply 3D printing to create sustainable food for countries with low food reserves. The most amazing use of 3D printing, however, comes in the form of printing human organs for transplants.

    While 3D printing seems like its out of sci-fi, the technology has actually been around since 1984 when Charles Hull created the first 3D printer. The cost of the technology, however, has kept it out of the public eye for most of the last 20 years. It was only until recently that universities and even regular Joe-types began to be able to afford the tech.

    Let’s jump to today when 3D printing is now taking off and scientists are using it to make groundbreaking discoveries in the world of science and medicine. This wonderful infographic from the fine folks at Printerinks shows how far 3D printing has come from its humble origins and how scientists are using the tech to grow organs.

    As we learned back when researchers were creating working blood vessels with a 3D printer, the process is as simple as it is complex. It starts with the growth of cells. The 3D printer comes into play when they are used to create a layered structure that’s then layered with cells that attach to the structure and turn it into the organ.

    With our current technology, it’s estimated that it would take 10 days to print a liver. As technology improves, it’s estimated that scientists could print a liver in three hours. That’s great news for the thousands of people who are waiting for a live transplant to save their life.

    The creation of organs through 3D printing has another, less talked about function, as well. If we could test drugs on 3D printed human livers, it would save millions of dollars and years of time that it takes to develop and test new drugs on animals before it’s even considered for human testing.

    As you can see, 3D printing is seriously the most important invention of the 20th century. The only problem is that the technology doesn’t get enough credit for the potential it has. As long as I live, I hope to sing the praises of 3D printing from the rooftops until I need new lungs created through 3D printing to replace my old ones.

    Bioprinting infographic

    Created by Printerinks

  • 3D Printers Continue To Be The Most Amazing Invention Ever

    If you’ve been following our coverage of 3D printers, you know that I’m absolutely in love with them. They enable all sorts of amazing creations that were previously unheard of in the world of science, medicine and, perhaps most importantly, toys. The latest 3D printer project from University of Pennsylvania has the potential to save lives and be revolutionary at the same time.

    Scientists have theorized about the possibilities of making organs through 3D printing for a few years now. The bioengineers at Pennsylvania have found a way to make this more of a reality by finding a way to create blood vessel systems out of sugar via 3D printers. This is a huge step forward as any potential organs created via 3D printers would need the necessary blood vessel framework to deliver oxygen and remove waste.

    So where did they get this revolutionary idea to create blood vessels out of sugar? Funny enough, a science exhibit on the human body gave one of the researchers, Jordan Miller, the idea. He says that he saw plastic casts of “whole organ blood vessels” and that’s what led him to theorize that 3D printers could create working blood vessels.

    The process works something like this. The 3D printer uses the sugar to create a set of guiding pipes that will direct the fluid. The team then coats these pipes with a corn-based polymer to stabilize the sugar. In what may be the most sci-fi thing you see all day, they then dump a batch of cells onto the man-made creation and they go to work turning these sugar tubes into living tissue. After all is said and done, the cells dissolve the sugar walls and leave an entire network of living tissue in their wake.

    If this doesn’t blow your mind with the implications that such a discovery has for medicine, just watch this video of the researchers making the blood vessels. I’ve always said that 3D printers were the key to a lot of tomorrow’s advances and it looks like one of them has been found today. I can’t wait to see what else this team and teams all over the world come up with as 3D printers decrease in price and expand in power. The idea of being able to print your own working car might not be too far off.

    [h/t: Spectrum]

  • If You Ever Wanted To See An MRI Of Childbirth, Here’s Your Chance

    Back in December, 2010, German scientists captured the first-ever MRI of live childbirth. It went down exactly how you think – a woman delivered a baby whilst encapsulated by an MRI machine. She was 24-years-old and was admitted to the hospital at about 37 and a half weeks.

    So next time your mother tells you how difficult you made her life while coming out of the womb, just point her to this story. Or don’t, you know, if you want to keep your head.

    At the time, we were only treated with still images of the MRI birth – which were amazing enough. But now, a video clip has germinated, and it’s absolutely incredible.

    Check it out below:

    Here’s what we’re looking at, according to the study:

    Accelerated real-time cinematic MRI seriesAccelerated real-time cinematic MRI series in an open high-field scanner during the active second stage of labor, when the mother starts performing expulsive efforts with the valsalva maneuver. The midsagittal plane is shown and the amniotic membranes are intact.

    The reason the images stop right as the baby’s head begins its exit is because that’s the moment researchers stopped the MRI in order to protect the baby’s ears from that notoriously deafening MRI noise.

    According to New Scientist, the whole reason for the MRI was to look at the relationship between fetal movement and its position as it make its way down the birth canal. All I know is that I much prefer this view to the one we’re all familiar with from health class.

  • Web-Based Autism Diagnosis Helps Patients

    Researchers at Harvard Medical School have significantly reduced from hours to minutes the time it takes to accurately detect autism in young children.

    The process of diagnosing autism is complex, subjective, and often limited to only a segment of the population in need. With the recent rise in incidence to 1 in 88 children, the need for accurate and widely deployable methods for screening and diagnosis is substantial. Dennis Wall, associate professor of pathology and director of computational biology initiative at the Center for Biomedical Informatics at Harvard Medical School, has been working to address this problem and has discovered a highly accurate strategy that could significantly reduce the complexity and time of the diagnostic process.

    Wall has been developing algorithms and associated deployment mechanisms to detect autism rapidly and with high accuracy. The algorithms are designed to work within a mobile architecture, combining a small set of questions and a short home video of the subject, to enable rapid online assessments. This procedure could reduce the time for autism diagnosis by nearly 95 percent, from hours to minutes, and could be easily integrated into routine child screening practices to enable a dramatic increase in reach to the population at risk.

    “We believe this approach will make it possible for more children to be accurately diagnosed during the early critical period when behavioral therapies are most effective,” said Wall.

    This research was published today in Nature: Translational Psychiatry.

    Autism is diagnosed through a careful analysis of an individual’s behavior. When children are evaluated for autism, they typically take the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised, known as the ADI-R, a 93-question questionnaire, and/or the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, known as the ADOS exam, which measures several behaviors in children. Together these evaluations can take up to three hours to complete and must be administered by a trained clinician. Often, there is a delay of more than a year between initial warning signs and diagnosis because of the waiting times to see a clinical professional who can administer the tests and deliver the formal diagnosis, Wall said.

    Using machine learning techniques, an artificial intelligence method where machines are trained to make decisions, Wall and his team studied results of the ADI-R from the Autism Genetic Research Exchange for more than 800 individuals diagnosed with autism to find redundancies across the exam. They found that only seven questions were sufficient to diagnose autism with nearly 100 percent accuracy, equivalent to the full 93-question exam. They validated the accuracy of the seven question survey against answer sets from more than 1,600 individuals from the Simons Foundation and more than 300 individuals from the Boston Autism Consortium.

    Wall applied similar techniques to the ADOS exam, this time classifying more than 1,050 individuals with near perfect sensitivity and slightly less than 95 percent specificity. The outcome of this work was not only a shortened mechanism for evaluating a child (8 out of 29 steps), but also a roadmap for evaluating short home video clips. Together these results have tremendous potential to move a substantial percentage of the effort into a mobilized electronic health framework with broad reach and applications.

    “This approach is the first attempt to retrospectively analyze large data repositories to derive a highly accurate, but significantly abbreviated classification tool,” said Wall, who is also associate professor of pathology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. “This kind of rapid assessment should provide valuable contributions to the diagnostic process moving forward and help lead to faster screening and earlier treatment,” he said.

    The traditional diagnostic surveys for autism can be prohibitive for families and caregivers because they are lengthy and have to be administered by a licensed clinician, often in an environment that is unfamiliar to the child, which can be a tremendous burden for families in remote areas, said Wall. “With this mobilized approach, the parent or caregiver will be able to take the crucial first steps to diagnosis and treatment from the comfort of their own home, and in just a few minutes.”

    Currently, Wall has made a survey and video site available to the public for free to continue evaluating the effectiveness of the shortened approaches and is working on ways to mobilize the overall approach to enable wide reach across the entire population in need. His team has also launched a Facebook page to spread the word and to share the survey more broadly. To date, 2,500 people have taken the Autworks survey.

  • Nanotechnology Leaps Forward With New Cancer Drug

    Nanotechnology Leaps Forward With New Cancer Drug

    A team of scientists, engineers and physicians have found promising effects of a first-in-class targeted cancer drug called BIND-014 in treating solid tumors.

    BIND-014 is the first targeted and programmed nanomedicine to enter human clinical studies. In the study, the researchers demonstrate BIND-014’s ability to effectively target a receptor expressed in tumors to achieve high tumor drug concentrations, as well as show remarkable efficacy, safety and pharmacological properties compared to the parent chemotherapeutic drug, docetaxel (Taxotere).

    “BIND-014 demonstrates for the first time that it is possible to generate medicines with both targeted and programmable properties that can concentrate the therapeutic effect directly at the site of disease, potentially revolutionizing how complex diseases such as cancer are treated,” said Omid Farokhzad, MD, a physician-scientist in the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, associate professor at Harvard Medical School, and study co- senior author.

    “Previous attempts to develop targeted nanoparticles have not successfully translated into human clinical studies because of the inherent difficulty of designing and scaling up a particle capable of targeting, long-circulation via immune-response evasion, and controlled drug release,” said Robert Langer, ScD, David H. Koch Institute Professor, MIT and study co-senior author.
    According to the researchers, the drug is the first of its kind to reach clinical evaluation and demonstrates a differentially high drug concentration in tumors by targeting drug encapsulated nanoparticles directly to the site of tumors. This leads to substantially better efficacy and safety.

    “It is wonderful to witness a world-class team of scientists, engineers, physicians, for-profit and non-project organizations converge to develop this potentially revolutionary technology for treatment of cancers. The effectiveness of this team has been remarkable and serves as model for translational research” said Edward J. Benz, Jr. MD, President of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

    The research and development of the first targeted programmable nanomedicine to show anti-tumor effects in humans represents the culmination of more than a decade of investigation initially carried out in academic labs at BWH and MIT.

  • Internet Searches For Health Info Cause Fear, Skepticism

    Dig if you will a picture: You’ve noticed a lump in your throat. It’s not a painful lump but you can vaguely feel that it’s constantly there. Over a month or so it doesn’t go away, so you embark on some amateur pathology via the internet to see what you can find out. Before you’ve even had a chance to click on any links, this is what you’re struck with:

    Immediately confronted with the big C-word, you flea to Bing to try that search engine. Unfortunately, it’s no less terrorizing.

    You don’t even need to search for something as specific as lump in throat to get a digital death sentence. Type in something vague like “green spots” and you’re immediately greeted with an onslaught of health information.

    Looking up a medical symptom isn’t the same as looking up the definition of “tergiversation” on Merriam-Webster.com or searching for examples of neo-liberalism on Wikipedia. Medical diagnoses aren’t compartmentalized. Plus, there’s a reason that medical training for doctors is so intense and exhaustive (and exhausting if you are a doctor-to-be). The human body is a bizarre set of puzzle pieces and nobody’s pieces are really made the same, either. Further, the more serious your potential illness may be, the less you probably wan’t to gamble with the internet’s standardized archive of information.

    The internet was expected to bridge the distance between patients and physicians but instead it turns out that the deluge of information can inspire skepticism and fear, according to a new study from the University of Buffalo. In the study, “The Devil You Know: Parental Online Information Seeking after a Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis,” researchers found that parents and caregivers of cancer-stricken children prefer the traditional visits to the doctor’s office over online searches for information about their child’s illness.

    “Respondents were telling us they were uncertain of the information online and that they were afraid of the unknown,” said Dr. Elizabeth Gage, the study’s co-author and professor of community health and behavior. “They didn’t want to run into stories about ‘the worst case scenario.”

    Gage, along with her co-researcher Christina Panagakis, a graduate student, interviewed 41 parents of children with cancer to find out how much they relied on the internet as a source of information about their child’s illness, prognosis, and treatment. While the interviewees for this study opted for real-person consultation with a doctor, that’s not to say that the internet doesn’t have some value in medical treatment.

    The information-seeking behavior of parents and other caregivers appears to be influenced by the volume of available information, Gage says. Patients with routine illnesses might find minor details online that better inform their conversations with health care providers, but respondents in this study who were confronting a more serious diagnosis were overwhelmed by the often conflicting sources of online material.

    This is all supposing that you even have the option to visit a doctor. It’s inconceivably expensive to pay for a doctor’s visit out-of-pocket and if you’re one of the millions of people who don’t have medical insurance, your only lifeline very well might be two take two Google searches and call in in the morning (well, that and a pair of crossed fingers). In that case, you’re left to the merciless horror flood of intimidating if not terrorizing medical information that abounds whenever you search medical symptoms so hopefully you’re symptoms aren’t something as mysterious as a lump in the throat or, god forbid, “green spots.” Who knows what fresh new psychological hell you’ll be left victim to.

  • Computer Models Help Predict Dementia Patterns

    Researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College have developed a computer program that has tracked the manner in which different forms of dementia spread within a human brain. They say their mathematic model can be used to predict where and approximately when an individual patient’s brain will suffer from the spread, neuron to neuron, of “prion-like” toxic proteins — a process they say underlies all forms of dementia.

    Their findings, published in the March 22 issue of Neuron, could help patients and their families confirm a diagnosis of dementia and prepare in advance for future cognitive declines over time. In the future — in an era where targeted drugs against dementia exist — the program might also help physicians identify suitable brain targets for therapeutic intervention, says the study’s lead researcher, Ashish Raj, Ph.D., an assistant professor of computer science in radiology at Weill Cornell Medical College.

    “Think of it as a weather radar system, which shows you a video of weather patterns in your area over the next 48 hours,” says Dr. Raj. “Our model, when applied to the baseline magnetic resonance imaging scan of an individual brain, can similarly produce a future map of degeneration in that person over the next few years or decades.

    “This could allow neurologists to predict what the patient’s neuroanatomic and associated cognitive state will be at any given point in the future. They could tell whether and when the patient will develop speech impediments, memory loss, behavioral peculiarities, and so on,” he says. “Knowledge of what the future holds will allow patients to make informed choices regarding their lifestyle and therapeutic interventions.

    “At some point we will gain the ability to target and improve the health of specific brain regions and nerve fiber tracts,” Dr. Raj says. “At that point, a good prediction of a subject’s future anatomic state can help identify promising target regions for this intervention. Early detection will be key to preventing and managing dementia.”

    The computational model, which Dr. Raj developed, is the latest, and one of the most significant, validations of the idea that dementia is caused by proteins that spread through the brain along networks of neurons. It extends findings that were widely reported in February that Alzheimer’s disease starts in a particular brain region, but spreads further via misfolded, toxic “tau” proteins. Those studies, by researchers at Columbia University Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital, were conducted in mouse models and focused only on Alzheimer’s disease.

    In this study, Dr. Raj details how he developed the mathematical model of the flow of toxic proteins, and then demonstrates that it correctly predicted the patterns of degeneration that results in a number of different forms of dementia.

    He says his model is predicated on the recent understanding that all known forms of dementia are accompanied by, and likely caused by, abnormal or “misfolded” proteins. Proteins have a defined shape, depending on their specific function — but proteins that become misshapen can produce unwanted toxic effects. One example is tau, which is found in a misfolded state in the brains of both Alzheimer’s patients and patients with frontal temporal dementia (FTD). Other proteins, such as TDP43 and ubiquitin, are also found in FTD, and alpha synuclein is found in Parkinson’s disease.

    These proteins are called “prion-like” because misfolded, or diseased, proteins induce the misfolding of other proteins they touch down a specific neuronal pathway. Prion diseases (such as mad cow disease) that involve transmission of misfolded proteins are thought to be infectious between people. “There is no evidence that Alzheimer’s or other dementias are contagious in that way, which is why their transmission is called prion-like.”

    Dr. Raj calls his model of trans-neuronal spread of misfolded proteins “very simple.” It models the same process by which any gas diffuses in air, except that in the case of dementias the diffusion process occurs along connected neural fiber tracts in the brain.

    “This is a common process by which any disease-causing protein can result in a variety of dementias,” he says.

    The model identifies the neural sub-networks in the brain into which misfolded proteins will collect before moving on to other brain areas that are connected by networks of neurons. In the process the proteins alter normal functioning of all brain areas they visit.

    “What is new and really quite remarkable is the network diffusion model itself, which acts on the normal brain connectivity network and manages to reproduce many known aspects of whole brain disease patterns in dementias,” Dr. Raj says. “This provides a very simple explanation for why different dementias appear to target specific areas of the brain.”

    In the study, he was able to match patterns from the diffusion model, which traced protein disbursal in a healthy brain, to the patterns of brain atrophy observed in patients with either Alzheimer’s disease or FTD. This degeneration was measured using MRI and other tools that could quantify the amount of brain volume loss experienced in each region of the patient’s brain. Co-author Amy Kuceyeski, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow who works with Dr. Raj, helped analyze brain volume measurements in the diseased brains.

    “Our study demonstrates that such a spreading mechanism leads directly to the observed patterns of atrophy one sees in various dementias,” Dr. Raj says. “While the classic patterns of dementia are well known, this is the first model to relate brain network properties to the patterns and explain them in a deterministic and predictive manner.”