WebProNews

Tag: media

  • British PM Rishi Sunak Pressure MPs As The Country Moves To Keep Media Bosses Criminally Liable

    British PM Rishi Sunak Pressure MPs As The Country Moves To Keep Media Bosses Criminally Liable

    It’s been nearly a year since the British Parliament introduced the Online Safety Bill which seeks to hold top tech executives and social media big bosses accountable for repeated breaches of their duty to keep younger users safe and protect children against harmful online content. 

    After some major back and forth since the bill was first introduced back in March 2022, and seeing three new prime ministers taking the seat, current PM Rishi Sunak has now managed to pressure a group of 50 Conservative MPs to approve the Online Safety Bill. 

    New amendments to the bill would see that those held liable will face up to two years in jail if social media platforms are found to repeatedly fail the protection of children and underage users. 

    The Online Safety Bill aims to make the UK one of the safest places in the world for online users. With the announcement of new amendments, new offenses have been added that make it even more justifiable to hold top tech executives accountable for destroying evidence and failing to attend or provide false information in one-on-one interviews with the country’s internet provider, Ofcom. 

    In a statement given to CNBC last year by the former U.K. Digital Minister Nadine Dorries says “Tech firms haven’t been held to account when harm, abuse, and criminal behavior have run riot on their platforms [..] Instead they have been left to mark their homework.”

    Since the statement, Paul Scully has been sworn in as the new Digital Minister and is expected to deliver a statement on the final outcomes of the new amendments. 

    With parliament now striking a deal, and Sunak continuing his fight for improving the online space and social media networks within the UK. The argument over online safety and child protection has come a long way, as government entities around the world and private organizations have criticized social media platforms for allowing harmful content to be shared on their platforms. 

    It’s not just Conservatives that have been backing the introduction of the bill, the Labour Party has also shown its support in recent weeks. 

    According to an interview with shadow culture secretary, Lucy Powell, “Labour has been calling for stronger criminal sanctions for months, however, the enforcement is now over a narrower set of measures after the government gutted much of the bill before Christmas.”

    While there has been some divide over the outcomes of criminal offenses, the Labour Party has vowed its backing to make social media executives face jail time for not being able to comply with new regulations. 

    Unfortunately, not everyone is on board with the introduction of the new bill and its legal proceedings. Rebecca MacKinnon, Vice President and Global Advocacy for The Wikimedia Foundation, a not-for-profit online organization said in an interview with the BBC that the adjusted amendments in the Online Safety Bill will infringe and limit the “freedom of expression.” 

    MacKinnon continued to say that new changes to the Online Safety Bill would not only be a threat to big corporations but public interest websites such as Wikipedia.

    The not-for-profit encyclopedia which is written and edited by thousands of volunteers around the world is looking to corner the new adjustments of the bill, as MacKinnon says that the UK Parliament should align itself with the EU Digital Service Act. MacKinnon is arguing that the Digital Services Act helps to differentiate between centralized content carried out by employees, and content moderated by community volunteers. 

    MacKinnon’s argument isn’t alone, as cybersecurity and economic experts suggest that the introduction of the new bill would limit investment from foreign companies, and restrict the access of online content to millions of online users. 

    While Sunak is powering forward to introduce new legislation within the coming months, some are worried that the decision to introduce the Online Safety Bill too fast could have greater repercussions in the long term. 

  • Verizon Media Sold to Apollo Funds

    Verizon Media Sold to Apollo Funds

    Following reports Verizon was exploring a sale of Yahoo and AOL, its Verizon Media business is being sold to Apollo Funds.

    Verizon purchased Yahoo and AOL, both pioneers among the early internet companies. Although both had since fallen on hard times, the two brands still had large, loyal followings. Verizon’s goal was to build an advertising business that could rival Google and Facebook.

    Unfortunately, the advertising business proved more difficult for Verizon to crack than it planned. Over the last several years, the company has been selling off some of its media properties, with Yahoo and AOL being the final piece. Apollo Funds has agreed to purchase Verizon Media for $5 billion. The new company will be known as Yahoo, and Verizon will maintain a 10% stake in it.

    “We are excited to be joining forces with Apollo,” said Guru Gowrappan, CEO, Verizon Media. “The past two quarters of double-digit growth have demonstrated our ability to transform our media ecosystem. With Apollo’s sector expertise and strategic insight, Yahoo will be well positioned to capitalize on market opportunities, media and transaction experience and continue to grow our full stack digital advertising platform. This transition will help to accelerate our growth for the long- term success of the company.”

    “We are thrilled to help unlock the tremendous potential of Yahoo and its unparalleled collection of brands,” said Reed Rayman, Private Equity Partner at Apollo. “We have enormous respect and admiration for the great work and progress that the entire organization has made over the last several years, and we look forward to working with Guru, his talented team, and our partners at Verizon to accelerate Yahoo’s growth in its next chapter.”

    “We are big believers in the growth prospects of Yahoo and the macro tailwinds driving growth in digital media, advertising technology and consumer internet platforms,” said David Sambur, Senior Partner and Co-Head of Private Equity at Apollo. “Apollo has a long track record of investing in technology and media companies and we look forward to drawing on that experience to help Yahoo continue to thrive.”

    “Verizon Media has done an incredible job turning the business around over the past two and a half years and the growth potential is enormous,” said Hans Vestberg, CEO, Verizon. “The next iteration requires full investment and the right resources. During the strategic review process, Apollo delivered the strongest vision and strategy for the next phase of Verizon Media. I have full confidence that Yahoo will take off in its new home.”

  • Facebook Announces Platform to Support Writers and Journalists

    Facebook Announces Platform to Support Writers and Journalists

    Facebook has announced a platform to help writers and journalists monetize their content at a time when news and media are under siege.

    This last pandemic-filled year has been particularly difficult for news publishers and the media industry in general. In the midst of those challenges, Big Tech has been under increased scrutiny for how it uses and profits from news and media. Australia passed legislation to force Big Tech companies to pay for the news they use and the US is considering a similar bill.

    Facebook has now taken the step of developing a platform designed to make it easier for writers and journalists to self-publish content and monetize it.

    As writers, experts and journalists publish more of their work independently, we’re working to better support those efforts and make it easier for those content creators to build businesses online.

    In the coming months in the U.S., we’ll introduce a new platform to empower independent writers, helping them reach new audiences and grow their businesses. We will start by partnering with a small subset of independent writers. The platform will include a variety of support focused on content creation and audience growth.

    The social media giant hopes its new platform will be especially beneficial to independent journalists.

    A large part of this initiative is aimed at supporting independent local journalists who are often the lone voice covering a given community. We’ll work to include them at launch, and build tools and services specific to their needs. Since 2018, we’ve invested $600 million to support journalism and we’re investing $1 billion in news over the next three years. We will continue to support publishers through the Facebook Journalism Project, our existing products and initiatives such as Facebook News, Accelerators, grants, subscriptions tools, Instant Articles and more.

    Facebook’s new platform could be a critical game-changer for independent writers, journalists and experts, and may help the company answer its critics.

  • BuzzFeed Lays Off 47 HuffPost Workers, Will Shutter HuffPost Canada

    BuzzFeed Lays Off 47 HuffPost Workers, Will Shutter HuffPost Canada

    Less than a month after acquiring rival HuffPost, BuzzFeed has announced it will lay off 47 workers and shutter HuffPost Canada altogether.

    BuzzFeed announced the deal in November, acquiring an ownership stake in HuffPost from Verizon. The deal saw Verizon retain a minority stake, and the two companies agreed to cross-syndicate each other’s content.

    Just three weeks after closing the deal, BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti announced the changes, impacting 47 employees, including eight managers. The remaining 35 are presumably journalists. Peretti said the cuts would help HuffPost break even for the year, and even pave the way toward profit.

    “Though BuzzFeed is a profitable company, we don’t have the resources to support another two years of losses,” Peretti said.

    “We want to ensure the homepage remains a top destination on the internet,” he added. “We also want to maintain high traffic, preserve your most powerful journalism, lean more deeply into politics and breaking news, and build a stronger business for affiliate revenue and shopping content.”

    BuzzFeed’s announcement is just the latest example of the hit media companies have taken during the pandemic.

  • Workers at Medium Are Forming the Newest Tech Union

    Workers at Medium Are Forming the Newest Tech Union

    Workers at Medium are the latest group of tech employees that have decided to unionize, in an industry where the concept was once foreign.

    An overwhelming majority of workers at Medium, some 70%, have come out in favor of forming a union with the Communications Workers of America. The Medium Workers Union has said it will push the company to create a more equitable workplace.

    The Medium Workers Union emphasizes the challenges faced by companies at the crossroads of media and tech, and is committed to helping the company and employees be responsible stewards of the responsibility that comes with that.

    We are organizing because both tech and media are at a crossroads, and it is more important than ever that companies in both industries are equitable and supportive of their employees. This is the age of newsroom buyouts, startups folding, tech companies shifting more jobs to contractors, and the general implosion of independent media. Tech and media companies alike are constantly changing direction, dissolving and reforming, pivoting and refocusing. This often creates business advantages, but it also upends workers’ lives. To thrive as a creative, sustainable platform, Medium must support and protect its workforce and create the best environment possible in these turbulent times.

    We will hold Medium, and ourselves, to ethical and just standards. We’ll amplify the voices of the marginalized. We’ll defend democracy with our platform. We’ll restore justice where harm has been done. We’ll help shape a company where all are welcome, protected, and have an equitable share in decision making. And together we’ll build a platform where our users are guaranteed the same.

    The tech industry was once a union-free zone, but recent events have begun to change that. Workers at Kickstarter created a union in February 2020, Alphabet created a union in January 2021 and Amazon workers are currently voting on unionization.

    One thing is clear: Tech companies are increasingly facing a reckoning with their employees and being held to higher standards than in the past.

  • DOJ Halts Net Neutrality Lawsuit Against California

    DOJ Halts Net Neutrality Lawsuit Against California

    The Department of Justice (DOJ) has withdrawn a lawsuit challenging California’s net neutrality rules.

    Net neutrality rules were passed during the Obama administration, with widespread support from companies, tech advocates and citizens. In short, net neutrality ensures a company can’t discriminate against a certain type of internet traffic just because it may have a financial motivation to do so. For example, Comcast would not be allowed to charge more for access to Netflix, just because Netflix competes against Comcast’s media properties.

    Under the Trump administration, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted along party lines to repeal net neutrality. A coalition of companies sued to overturn the ruling, but the court upheld the FCC’s right to repeal. At the same time, however, the courts also ruled that the FCC could not prevent individual states from establishing their own net neutrality legislation.

    California was quick to pass its own rules and, despite the court’s initial ruling, the FCC sued to try to block California’s efforts. With a change of administration, however, the DOJ has withdrawn its suit against California.

    In a statement, acting FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel praised the DOJ’s decision:

    I am pleased that the Department of Justice has withdrawn this lawsuit. When the FCC, over my objection, rolled back its net neutrality policies, states like California sought to fill the void with their own laws. By taking this step, Washington is listening to the American people, who overwhelmingly support an open internet, and is charting a course to once again make net neutrality the law of the land.

    Many are expecting federal net neutrality rules to be re-established, now that the White House is once again under Democratic control. The DOJ dropping its lawsuit seems like a first step in that direction.

  • Andreessen Horowitz Hires Maggie Leung As It Doubles Down On Media Strategy

    Andreessen Horowitz Hires Maggie Leung As It Doubles Down On Media Strategy

    Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has hired Maggie Leung, a well-known journalist, as executive editor as the company doubles down on its media efforts.

    Venture capitalists are increasingly looking to handle more of their own media, rather than relying on the press. Andreessen Horowitz has been on the leading edge of that, with a strong focus on speaking directly to its audience from day one. Blog posts, thought pieces, podcasts, op-eds, videos and more have all been an important part of a16z.

    The company is expanding its efforts with the hiring of Maggie Leung. Leung previously spent some 20 years as a journalist with The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and CNN. Most recently, she built NerdWallet’s content operation from the ground up.

    “Simply put, when you find someone like Maggie, you have to work with them,” writes Margit Wennmachers.

    “And of course Maggie is joining our outstanding editorial team, led by our wonderful managing editor Amelia Salyers, who hired many of the editors, and of course, the super-talented and incomparable Sonal Chokshi, who continues to guide our voice and editorial vision as our editor in chief. Every piece of content you see or hear has been shaped and edited by the editorial team.”

  • Power of the People: Kellogg’s Dumps Breitbart.com… so Breitbart’s Readers Dumping Kellogg’s

    We don’t often comment on politics here at WebProNews.com, but I thought it was interesting to lay out the facts of a major brands decision (Kellogg) to suspend ads on a popular conservative website (Breitbart.com) and that sites’ attempt to fight back.

    Freedom of speech and freedom of the press is an important principal of democracy and for an advertiser to make a public pronouncement that Breitbart.com does not carry their values is disturbing, considering that the site holds the same views for the most part as Trump, his 60 million voters and Brietbart’s 45 million readers. The site is not racist in the slightest, so is Kellogg saying that they don’t want their products consumed by Breitbart readers, Trump supporters or conservatives?

    Breitbart started a petition against Kellogg yesterday which already has over 120,000 signatures.

    Go here to sign.

    Fact: Breitbart.com is a conservative site with its own paid writers as well as many contributors, just like most other mainstream news websites and liberal sites such as the Huffington Post.

    Fact: Breitbart.com is not a white nationalist site and has been slandered by the national media seeking to disempower the Trump administration since he hired Steve Bannon, the former CEO of Breitbart. Trump, Bannon, Breitbart and their readers, voters and supporters are America First Conservatives, not racists, Nazi sympathizers or any other unsupported slanderous lie put out there by those that politically disagree with America First Nationalism.

    Fact: There is no evidence presented by the media that Breitbart is a white nationalist site or racist in any way. There was an article headline that used the term “renegade jew”, which proved nothing considering that the story was from a contributing Jewish writer referring to an issue about Israel. The racist accusation has been totally debunked, yet Kellogg can’t see past political hyperbole.

    Fact: News sites have many points of views expressed in their articles and the media knows that every article isn’t the exact point of view of management. For instance Arianna Huffington or AOL is not responsible for every article or headline that included the word Jew…
    I’m Not a Hypochondriac, I’m Just a Jew – Huffington Post
    Seth Cohen, The Manic Pixie Jewish Boy – Huffington Post
    Don’t Call Me Jew – Huffington Post
    The Fat Jew Latest to Join ‘Dancing With the Stars’ Cast – Huffington Post

    Fact: Kellogg bought in hook, line and sinker to the slanderous lie that Breitbart.com is a white nationalist site, or are they just against American’s who voted for Trump? From Bloomberg: “We regularly work with our media-buying partners to ensure our ads do not appear on sites that aren’t aligned with our values as a company,” said Kris Charles, a spokeswoman for Kellogg, which also makes Frosted Flakes and Special K cereal. “We recently reviewed the list of sites where our ads can be placed and decided to discontinue advertising on Breitbart.com. We are working to remove our ads from that site.”

    The problem here is politics and the mainstreaming of slander by the media. At worst, Breitbart is the Huffington Post of the political right. Nothing more and nothing less. It’s the responsibility of brands like Kellogg to see through the fog of disinformation by Trump’s political opponents before, in effect, disparaging all of his voters and all of Breitbart’s readers.

    The question for Kellogg and other advertisers is, do you really want to pick sides, liberal vs. conservative? Is that good for shareholders and is that good for your brand?

  • Google Posts to Give Public Figures, Organizations A Podium in Search Results

    Google Posts to Give Public Figures, Organizations A Podium in Search Results

    Google is trying out a new social media-like experiment in its search results. We all know how the whole Google+ thing has gone, and now it looks as though the company is trying a new, different approach.

    It’s called Google Posts, and for now it’s only available to U.S. presidential candidates. However, in time, Google intends to open the feature up to other prominent figures and organizations. If it ever goes beyond that remains to be seen. Figures and organizations join the waitlist right now though.

    The application is simple. It simply asks for name, email, and “additional notes”.

    Screen Shot 2016-03-08 at 9.52.51 AM

    “Every day millions of people search on Google, many of whom are looking for information about the upcoming presidential elections,” Google says. “Now there’s a way for users to hear directly from the candidates they’re searching for in real time on Google.”

    “US presidential candidates can now communicate with text, images and videos directly on Google,” it adds. “Creating content is fast and simple, and once published, posts will appear instantly in search results related to the candidate. Each post can also be shared on popular social networks, amplifying the message even further.”

    It will be interesting to see where Google goes with this. It’s also interesting that they’re doing this now that they have access to Twitter’s firehose for real-time tweets.

    Images via Google

  • Facebook Instant Articles Finally Come to Android

    Facebook Instant Articles Finally Come to Android

    Facebook announced that Android users can finally now read its Instant Articles. In October, everyone using the iPhone app became able to read thousands of them from the News Feed on a daily basis, and now Android users can do the same.

    Beyond loading quickly, Instant Articles offer publishers some other interesting functionality such as autoplay videos that begin as readers scroll, the ability to zoom in on photos while tilting the phone, the ability to like and comment on individual photos and videos in a story, geo-tagged images, and swipable photo galleries.

    Instant Articles Launches for iPhone with Thousands of New Articles Published Daily from Facebook on Vimeo.

    Facebook has been beta testing Instant Articles for Android with with a small group for a few weeks. According to the company, people are already sharing Instant Articles more often than standard web articles.

    “More than 350 publications around the world have already joined the Instant Articles program to date, and more than 100 are already publishing daily — with more joining each day,” says Facebook. “We’re thrilled to collaborate with our partners in each of these regions, and we will continue to advance the product based on their feedback.”

    Here in the U.S., the following publications are currently utilizing Instant Articles: ABC News, Billboard, Billy Penn, Bleacher Report, Breitbart, Brit + Co, Business Insider, Bustle, BuzzFeed, CBS News, CBS Sports, Citylab, CNET, CNN, CNNMoney, ComicBook.Com, Complex, Conservative Tribune, Cosmopolitan, Country Living, Cracked, Daily Dot, E! News, Elite Daily, ELLE, Entertainment Weekly, Fish Wrapper, Fox Deportes, Fox News, Fox News Insider, Fox News Magazine, Fox Sports, FTW, Fusion, Gawker, Gawker Media, Good Housekeeping, Harper’s Bazaar, Hello Giggles, Hollywood Life, The Huffington Post, Independent Journal, In Touch, Life&Style, LittleThings.com, Mashable, Men’s Health, Mental Floss, Mic, mindbodygreen, MLB, Mother Jones, MoviePilot, MTV, National Geographic, NBA, NBC News, New York, NPR, New York Post, Opposing Views, Paper Magazine, Patch, Perez Hilton, PopSugar, Rare, Raw Story, Refinery29, Rolling Stone, Scary Mommy, Serial Podcast, Seventeen, Slate, SPIN, TechCrunch, Telemundo, The Atlantic, The Blaze, The Dodo, The Hollywood Reporter, The New York Times, The Onion, The Verge, The Washington Post, The Weather Channel, Time Inc., TMZ, Univision, UPROXX, Upworthy, Us Weekly, USA Today, Variety, VICE, Vox, Wall Street Journal, and 12Tomatoes.

    You can see publications in other countries here.

    Image via Facebook

  • Wikipedia Is Bitching About Media Coverage

    English Wikipedia administrator Robert Fernandez just published a blog post on the official Wikimedia blog complaining about Wikipedia / Wikimedia’s media coverage – both quantity and quality.

    On which we are now reporting.

    According to Fernandez, the media doesn’t really understand Wikipedia, its parent organization Wikimedia, or the other projects under its umbrella.

    “Both qualitatively and quantitatively, news coverage is inadequate for a website and movement as large and influential as Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The news media has little understanding of the mechanics of Wikipedia, the role of the Foundation, non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects, and other important issues involving the encyclopedia and the community. The coverage we usually see is neither in-depth, nor specialized, nor systematic,” he writes.

    “To the English-language news media, Wikipedia is a foreign country. They don’t speak the language, they don’t know how anything works.”

    According to Fernandez, news outlets need Wikipedians in residence.

    “There are plenty of stories here to be told, and a Wikipedian in residence could help tell them. In the process, they could help educate the media about how Wikipedia works and let them know that there are stories worth telling in the Wikimedian community too.”

    In order to bolster his claims that Wikipedia doesn’t get its fair share, he presents this chart of New York Times story subjects in 2015:

    Screen Shot 2015-10-27 at 11.12.59 AM

    As you can see, the Times writes a lot about Twitter, Facebook, and Google – and not so much about Wikipedia.

    It might not be fair to say that the entirety of the Wikimedia organization feels this way. I mean, there is this disclaimer at the end of the post:

    The views expressed in this blog post are not necessarily those of the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikipedia.

    Then again, this is the English Wikipedia administrator posting on the official Wikimedia blog, so …

    While you’re here, please take a look at our coverage of Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales’ Chuck Norris humor.

  • Twitter Is Testing A Trending News Tab

    Twitter Is Testing A Trending News Tab

    Twitter is reportedly testing a new “News” tab in its iOS and Android apps, which appears alongside the notifications tab, and gives users quick access to a section called “Trending News,” which shows news stories directly from publishers.

    The feature, first reported by Buzzfeed, is apparently Twitter’s answer to Facebook’s Instant Articles, and makes use of partnerships by select publishers. So far, they’re working with a number reported to be in the double digits, but the number would likely grow once the feature graduates from testing, assuming that happens.

    The official Twitter statement is as follows (via The Verge):

    “We’re experimenting with a news experience on iOS and Android as we continue to explore new ways to surface the best content to users.”

    Twitter is already a major source of news and a place where many get a lot of the news they read in the first place. It’s also a place where news often breaks before any publication actually picks a story up, not to mention being a source of commentary that’s frequently included in news coverage on all kinds of topics.

    While Twitter already has a popular Trends features where users can discover stories, a News feature seems like a perfect fit, particularly as rival Facebook continues to put more emphasis on news discovery.

    In fact, Facebook is testing a new live events feature making use of its Place Tips functionality, which many see as a direct competitor to Twitter.

    All of this follows news from earlier this summer that Twitter is working on something called “Project Lightning,” which lets people follow events better.

    Image via Garrett Heath, Flickr Creative Commons

  • The Verge Publisher Vox Media Acquires Re/code

    There’s a lot happening in the world of tech news media. The latest piece of news in the publisher circuit is that Vox Media (The Verge, SB Nation, Polygon, Vox.com, Eater, Racked, Curbed) is acquiring Re/code roughly a year and a half after its launch.

    Re/code was started at the beginning of 2014 after All Things D, led by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg, was spun off from The Wall Street Journal. It has operated under a company called Revere Digital, which launched with backing from NBCUniversal News Group and Windsor Media. It also hosted the Code Conference, which happens to be going on right now.

    A post on the Vox Media blog says:

    Re/code will continue to publish at Recode.net and across other platforms. Its coverage areas will complement those of the The Verge, our leading consumer tech lifestyle brand, by focusing particularly on tech business news and analysis.

    Re/code’s renowned tech and business conference division will continue to grow, and we will explore ways to apply Re/code’s leadership in this space to our other media brands over time.

    Re/code will benefit from Vox Media’s infrastructure and resources, and will eventually move on to Chorus, Vox Media’s proprietary platform. The current members of Re/code’s staff will soon be employees of Vox Media.

    Welcome, Kara, Walt, and the Re/code team to Vox Media!

    A post from Siwsher and Mossberg says:

    We want to assure you that this combination is designed to bolster and enrich Re/code, and that we will continue to publish under the same name and leadership, with editorial independence. We will also continue to hold our signature Code conferences, and even add new ones, again with the same core team and the same philosophy.

    Re/code will benefit from joining Vox Media by integrating Vox Media’s various capabilities — including marketing, communications, audience development, sales and production. We will also eventually migrate to Vox Media’s beautiful, powerful and flexible proprietary publishing platform, which will give us new ways to present our stories to you.

    We plan as well to collaborate where appropriate with Vox Media’s current and very successful tech news site, The Verge. While the two sites occasionally overlap, we have focused on the business of tech, while The Verge has focused on covering tech from a lifestyle perspective.

    We are excited that, after only 18 months, we are able to join Vox Media’s great family of sites and gain new resources and colleagues that will help us grow and get better at focusing on what matters most to you, our readers.

    Here’s a video of the two joking and talking about the news followed by Vox Media CEO Jim Bankoff talking about it at the conference:

    Nilay Patel, editor-in-chief at The Verge, also wrote a post about welcoming Re/code to Vox Media, how they’ll work together, and how The Verge itself is also growing. He wrote:

    When the opportunity to work more closely with Recode arrived, it made perfect sense: Recode covers the business of technology better than any other publication in the world. Kara and Walt have built a juggernaut of reporting talent and an unparallelled conference series designed for business leaders and executives, and the competition isn’t even close. Bringing Recode into the Vox Media fold means that The Verge can remain focused on being the best mainstream technology and lifestyle site in the world, and Recode can dig even deeper into how the money and business of technology works. Recode will maintain its site and branding, but over time we’ll work hard to find as many ways to work together as possible.

    We are making one change, though: Recode’s tremendous reviews team of Lauren Goode, Katie Boehret, and Bonnie Cha will join the Verge staff, and Walt Mossberg will be writing reviews and columns for both sites. It’s an exciting expansion of our already best-in-the-business tech news and reviews team, and I can’t wait to see what they do with The Verge’s incredible platform and resources.

    And that’s all just the start. We’re also increasing our overall investment in The Verge, and setting the stage to grow even bigger across the multiple platforms our audience finds us on every day. We’ve just hired new entertainment, science, and app reporters, and we are about to begin aggressively hiring transportation reporters. The incredible Verge Video team will double in size over the next few months. And we will continue hiring across The Verge as the year continues. It’s going to be an insane ride.

    As mentioned at the beginning, this is just the latest change in the tech media blogosphere. As reported yesterday, Gigaom, which announced its demise earlier this year, is being relaunched in August after being acquired by Knowingly. The site will continue with its existing domain and content library, but will move forward without the staff who made created it all.

    Other recent and major tech blog news came when Verizon announced its acquisition of AOL, which includes content sites like TechCrunch and Engadget. Those are about to be owned by Verizon.

    Image via Twitter

  • Gigaom Is Coming Back Under New Ownership

    In March, the tech news industry was shocked by the news that one of its most prominent blogs, Gigaom, was shutting down after revealing it was unable to pay its creditors. On Tuesday, it was announced that the site will be back. It just won’t be the Gigaom that you knew.

    In other words, the domain will be there, along with its archives of content, but what the new content that comes with the relaunch consists of remains to be seen.

    Gigaom.com was purchased by entrepreneur Byron Reese on Friday. His Austin-based startup Knowingly plans to relaunch the site on August 15. In the meantime, you can visit the site and see it basically as it’s been without any new content.

    In a press release, Reese described Gigaom as “second to none in what it does,” adding, “We are excited to be a chapter of the Gigaom story and look forward to continuing its mission of ‘humanizing the impact of technology.’”

    “We live at what I believe is the great turning point of all of human history, and that is being driven in large part by the technologies we are creating. This new world we are making will not just be more prosperous, but it will be more fair and more just than any time in the past,” he said. “Gigaom will continue documenting this transformation and the technologies which are driving it.”

    Still, it’s going to have to do so with a different staff of content creators. The former reporters have been hired away. Fortune hired Stacey Higginbotham, Barb Darrow, Katie Fehrenbacher, Mathew Ingram, Jeff John Roberts, and Jonathan Vanian. Variety hired Janko Roettgers, and Signe Brewster joined Backchannel.

    Om Malik (pictured) launched Gigaom in 2006, and left day-to-day operations in February of 2014. To our knowledge, he has yet to publicly comment on the site’s acquisition.

    Image via Olivier Ezratty, Wikimedia Commons

  • Will AOL Get Rid Of The Huffington Post Under Verizon?

    If you’ve been on the internet today, you probably know that Verizon is acquiring AOL, pending regulatory approval and closing conditions. While the announcement made no claims that AOL’s content properties would be spun off, reports at Re/code have suggested otherwise.

    As we referenced in an earlier article on the acquisition, Re/Code’s Peter Kafka suggested Verizon could decide to spin out AOL’s content operations with a third partner, “perhaps German publisher Axel Springer”.

    Re/Code’s Kara Swisher has since written:

    According to numerous sources, while it has been negotiating its deal to sell to Verizon, AOL has also been in advanced discussions with a number of parties to spin off its flagship Huffington Post content unit.

    The talks have been most serious with Axel Springer, the German media conglomerate, but a number of private equity firms have also expressed interest in the high-profile property. Sources said the Huffington Post has been valued at above $1 billion in this scenario, which would either be a complete sale or, more likely, structured as a joint venture.

    AOL has been sending around a statement in response to such reports (via Variety): “AOL owns a portfolio of premium, global content brands including The Huffington Post, TechCrunch and Endgadget, among others, and all of them will continue to be part of our business as we go forward.”

    Swisher says this contradicts what “several top AOL sources” told her this morning. As Kafka noted in his article, AOL CEO Tim Armstrong also said in the past that there was no truth to reports of a potential acquisition by Verizon.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Flipboard Tips From The Service’s Editorial Director

    According to Guy Kawasaki, speaking at Social Media Marketing World, “Curation is just as valuable as creation.”

    Flipboard, which turns its users into curators, apparently doesn’t quite see it that way. Editorial director Josh Quittner told The Drum a couple years ago, after the launch of its now fundamental “Magazines” curation feature, “The creator is still 
more valuable than the curator.”

    In other words, the content being curated by Flipboard users has to come from somewhere, and creators can take advantage of that fact and potentially gain traffic from the service. We recently dove into how you can go about doing so, but have since reached out to the company itself for some additional insight. The result was a Q&A with Quittner.

    Is Flipboard part of your content strategy? Let us know in the comments.

    First, he addressed a question about how Filpboard chooses what stories to show users, beyond the personalization that comes with topic, magazine, and profile following.

    “When you go to Flipboard, the first thing you see is your Cover Stories with highlights from everything you follow, including magazines, sources, topics and social networks,” he says. “We look at a whole bunch or heuristics to determine what to show in your Cover Stories such as comments, likes and interactions on Flipboard as well as the social networks you have connected. As you add more things on Flipboard such as sources, magazines and people, their posts will begin to appear in your Cover Stories. We also give personalized recommendations for magazines and people to follow based on your interests. An algorithm-driven discovery engine analyzes millions of articles each day across more than 34,000 topics, suggesting content based on your interests and preferences. These are some of the ways we strive to make content that’s relevant to you more easily discoverable.”

    Flipboard has a set of community guidelines on how to share and how not to share content on the service. Asked about some dos and don’ts beyond the standard guidelines, Quittner had the following to say.

    “We see that readers appreciate focus. General topics such as ‘technology,’ ‘food’ or ‘design’ are great if you’re curating a collection for your own reference, but if you want to build an audience, general topics don’t give readers much to get excited about. Get specific, like instead of ‘gadgets’ go for ‘gadgets for kids’ or instead of ‘recipes’ choose ‘slow-cooker recipes.’”

    “Once you’ve picked a topic, start thinking about your perspective on it. A magazine with a point of view and a tone of voice resonates well with readers. We see magazines about the same topic but with different points of view all the time. Your take on happiness, healthcare or fast cars will be different than anyone else’s.”

    “When you first start a new magazine, keep it private for a while until you have about 40 items in it. By then you will know if you picked a topic you are really interested in and for your readers there will really be something to read. I’ve seen exceptions too – if you’re making a magazine about an event or for a class for instance you may not need the same amount of content. The 10 articles to read for science class this week can also work.”

    “Then there are some practical things you want to think about such as a magazine title and cover photo. A compelling magazine title, which can be descriptive or creative, can attract new readers and so can an attractive cover. And don’t forget the basics: make sure your profile has a photo and description. Providing a face to a name helps establish trust and adds a human element to your profile.”

    “I also want to make sure curators know they can use badges to spread the word about their magazines. At share.flipboard.com you can find tools to help build your magazines’ reach. There is a profile badge that will take people to your profile page with all your magazines, as well as a magazine widget. If you add the widget to your website, a magazine cover that updates dynamically will be displayed.”

    On whether it’s better for users to create/curate one or two magazines or a bunch of them…

    “Curating is personal so it really depends on what your goals are,” says Quittner. “If you want to connect with likeminded people and build up an audience, I recommend curating a separate magazine for each interest. If your magazine is more for yourself, than it’s fine to collect everything in one magazine.”

    A couple of questions that a lot of people would probably ask are: Does it matter how much of the content in a user’s magazine comes from their own website? Is it always better to have a mix, or is it sometimes good to have magazines that explicitly feature your own content?

    “It’s really up to you,” says Quittner. “A Flipboard magazine can be a great way to make your blog more discoverable or to make it look beautiful on a mobile device. We see bloggers who flip a lot of their own blog posts into a magazine and mix in stories by others about the same topic or with a similar point of view. We also see bloggers compliment the magazine with their own content on other platforms, for instance Medium posts, Tweets, Instagrams or photos from your phone.”

    “Some of the larger blogs, curate multiple magazines on Flipboard,” he adds. “For instance, if your blog is about technology, you could curate all your stories about wearables into one magazine and create another magazine with all your games content.”

    He notes that Flipboard has tools specifically for bloggers, which you can look through here.

    As noted in a previous article, we’ve seen some people speculate on the SEO value of having content in Flipboard. Asked about this, Quittner says, “We’ve seen that Flipboard helps drive traffic to publishers and content creators by making content more discoverable. Now that Flipboard is on the Web, you may have noticed that your magazines will surface when you do a Google search. Adding descriptions to your magazine and your profile helps people understand what your content is about and it’s part of what the search engines crawl.”

    In October, Flipboard said 10 million magazines had been created. Asked for an update on that and how many are actively updated, Quittner tells us, “Since we launched the third generation of Flipboard in October, which introduced topics we saw the number of magazines created by our readers grow fast. We’re now at 15 million. And over the same period of time we doubled the number of active curators. Flipboard 3.0 has also made people more engaged and while we had 30 million monthly active readers in October of last year, we now have almost 50 million.”

    In addition to asking Quittner some questions, we reached out to Mathew Ingram, formerly of Gigaom (which was still operational at the time of our interaction), about getting more out of the service. Ingram has been featured on Flipboard’s own blog, where he talked about how he uses the service.

    “I actually think having multiple magazines makes a lot of sense,” he tells WebProNews. “That way you can segment and target your various interests and appeal to different readers.”

    On how much of the content in your magazine should come from your own stuff, Ingram says, “I think a 70-30 breakdown is a good rule of thumb for a lot of social media — so 70 percent or so content from other publishers or creators and about 30 percent from you.”

    Asked about traffic, Ingram says, “We often see some high volume from Flipboard to our stories, although not regularly enough to count on. And it’s difficult to track why some stories take off and others don’t.”

    Are you taking measures to increase your content’s exposure with Flipboard? Do you plan to in the future? Let us know in the comments.

  • 29% Of Millennials Can’t Recall Last Time They Read A Newspaper

    29% Of Millennials Can’t Recall Last Time They Read A Newspaper

    Last week, a study from the Media Insight Project came out finding that millennials have little interest in paying for news. Now, Retale has some new findings based on a poll of over 1,000 people, looking at newspaper readership, format preferences, and attitude toward paying for content.

    According to that, only 19% of millennials have paid for newspaper content (print or digital) in the last month, while 50% of all age groups are completely unwilling to pay for print. Millennials are the least willing at 55%.

    In fact, 29% of all millennials said that they couldn’t even recall the last time they read a print newspaper.

    “Millennials are a digital-first audience,” said Retale President Pat Dermody. “They’re not consuming print newspaper content in the same way as previous generations. For the industry to adapt, they’ll have to be creative and consider new digital formats to support readership and drive revenue.”

    67% of all age groups were against paying for digital news access while 50% were unwilling for print. About 60% of all millennials said they’re not willing to pay anything for digital news access.

    According to the study, 27% of millennials prefer a Netflix-like, “all-you-can-eat” payment structure for digital news. It also dound that 76% of those 55 and older are completely unwilling to pay anything for digital news access. Millennials prefer to access digital content via mobile browser (37%) vs. PC (35%).

    Here’s what the numbers look like for paying for digital news:

    85% of respondents who choose to get their news digitally cited cost as a key factor. 59% cited convenience, and surprisingly only 39% cited more up-to-date content. For print, 49% cited familiarity, while 37% said the experience is less distracting than a website. 36% cited convenience, and 27% cited perceived credibility of content.

    For those few millennials who do prefer print content, 31% cited credibility compared to 26% citing convenience. For those 35 and over, 39% cited convenience over 26% for credibility.

    When it comes to receiving and redeeming deals and retail promotions, 40% of millennials prefer digital, and this is the largest group that does. 52% of those 35 and over prefer print.

    “Retail circulars have long been one of the most effective marketing tools in retail marketing,” said Dermody. “However, broader trends in media consumption, with readers migrating from print to digital, can’t be ignored. In digitizing print circulars, retailers can navigate the evolving landscape and preserve a proven marketing strategy. They can also better connect with this new and growing group of mobile, millennial shoppers.”

    Image via Thinkstock

  • Should Google Show Press Releases As News?

    Should Google Show Press Releases As News?

    As you’ve probably noticed in the past, Google sometimes includes an “In the News” section in its search results. This points users to a few sources that have newsy information about whatever it is that they searched for.

    The feature used to point users to stories indexed in Google News. It still does that, but last fall, Google started showing content from additional sources, including reddit, to go along with the Google News content.

    Now, Google showing content directly from the companies that are in the news has become a story.

    Should Google show company content under the guise of news? Do you think this will mislead users? Let us know in the comments.

    Reuters reported on Wednesday that the feature has been letting company statements in at the top of the news links. The narrative of the report is that biased statements and press releases can appear above unbiased news stories, and mislead users about critical information. A side narrative of the report is that this can also hurt news publisher traffic. It shares this from Google:

    “The goal of search is to get users the right answer at any one time as quickly as possible — that may mean returning an article from an established publisher or from a smaller niche publisher or indeed it might be a press release,” the Google spokeswoman said.

    She added Google, which did not announce the September change, does not get paid for including press releases on the lists.

    Examples of companies who have recently topped the “In the News” section include Gemalto and Apple. The former has been doing damage control after a hacking incident, while the latter is selling smart watches. It’s worth noting that some find one of the more significant angles of the Apple Watch to be that some models cost as much as $17,000, and this is not something that Apple drew attention to in its own announcements.

    According to Reuters, the Gemalto statement that appeared in the section downplayed the impact of the hacking. This is the main thing that’s not sitting well with critics. Should a company be able to have that kind of control over the narrative of news stories about themselves?

    If you ask me, it’s a fair question, but it’s also probably being a bit blown out of proportion. Maybe I’m giving people too much credit, but I think most users can figure out that if a story is coming directly from a company, it’s probably going to have that bias. And it’s not like Google shows only one story in these news boxes. Maybe the company message shouldn’t always rank above other unbiased reports, but there’s likely enough other content on the page to discern that it’s not the only take on the news. There’s also something to be said for allowing a company (especially when under attack in the media) to have its side of the story heard.

    When it comes to announcements, it’s likely that the company’s version of the story is actually the best result in some cases. Like Nate Swanner at Slash Gear notes, “The issue here is context.”

    This shouldn’t be a problem if Google can get the context right. Whether or not it can is another argument.

    There are some other points to consider here that don’t seem to be getting much mention by those who have weighed into the conversation. For one, Google News itself has included press releases for a long time. I’m not sure if this has always been the case, but it’s been like that for years. It’s not at all uncommon to see results from Business Wire, PR Newswire, and others. That’s fine, and truth be told, sometimes I prefer these results.

    The main difference is apparently that now Google may show releases directly from the corporate websites (like Apple.com, for example) in the “In the News” section. It’s really not a huge leap from what has long been possible. A release from one of the aforementioned distribution services could have appeared there anyway. I just don’t see this as a major concern.

    Google does say in a Google News help article, “For sites containing press releases, please keep in mind that we’re unable to include sites that primarily promote their own product or organization.”

    Again, that’s Google News, and the “In the News” section includes additional content, so this doesn’t appear to apply to that. Also, press release distribution services clearly fall into a different category as they promote everybody’s content, not just a single company’s.

    Google’s web search algorithm has hurt press release sites in the past. That’s not really here nor there, but it is an interesting aside. It was actually less than a year ago that we were talking about press releases sites taking a hit after Panda 4.0. News results are a different beast though.

    Another element that should be a part of this conversation is that Google and Twitter recently struck a deal, which will likely see Google including more real-time tweet activity in search results. It remains to be see how Google is going to implement that this time around, but it’s going to give Google better access to fresh content, which could downplay the significance of the “In the News” box. It’s also possible that it could contribute directly to what actually appears in that box. We don’t know.

    See: Google’s Twitter Deal May Impact Your Reputation

    As far as the “In the News” section, AdWeek’s PRNewser says, “The change is good news for PR and bad news for major journalistic institutions like the Times and The Wall Street Journal, because whoever posts the announcement first will get top placement and clicks. It’s a symptom of our digital age, though: new distribution channels allow brands — and, by extension, their PR teams — to become publishers with greater power to drive the narrative.”

    Some think businesses will be able to game their way into the “In the News” results.

    What do you think about the whole thing. Is there cause for concern here? Share your thoughts.

    Image via Google

  • Yahoo Is Shutting Down More Services

    Yahoo Is Shutting Down More Services

    Yahoo has been shutting down a lot of its products since Marissa Mayer took over as CEO. It even closed the famous Yahoo Directory that put the company on the map.

    Yahoo just announced its next round of shut-downs.

    “In 2014, we invested in our strengths – search, communications, and digital content,” the company says. “To do this, we’ve sunset more than 60 products and services over the past two years, allowing us to focus on the offerings that matter most to our users. With more people focused on our core services, we’re seeing those investments pay off with better, richer user experiences that align with Yahoo’s vision.”

    First off, the company will shutter some market-specific media properties.

    “This month and in Q1 2015, we will be closing some of our regional, genre-specific media sites and automatically redirecting users in these markets to the Yahoo homepage,” Yahoo says. “The infinite news stream on the Yahoo homepage will feature relevant local and global content from Yahoo editorial and our regional content providers.”

    As of today, Yahoo has consolidated its regional homepages in Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, and Chile, and redirected them to the Yahoo en Español homepage. Soon it will close Yahoo News, Yahoo Lifestyle, Yahoo Movies and Yahoo Celebrity in these countries, redirected them to the Yahoo en Español homepage.

    On December 22, it will close the regional Yahoo News and Celebrity properties in Greece, Romania, and South Africa, redirecting them to the Yahoo homepage, which has been updated for the regions. This month it will also close all genre-specific media sites in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, including Yahoo News, Yahoo SHE, Yahoo Sports, Yahoo OMG, and Yahoo Entertainment. Users will be redirected to the Yahoo homepage for the market.

    Yahoo is also shutting down Maktoob Forums, Profile.Yahoo.com, Yahoo Classic Games, Alerts.Yahoo.com, and Open Cascade. More details on all of that here.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Google News Closure Already Hurting Publishers [Report]

    As you may know, Google announced it would shut down Google News in Spain today as a new law takes effect, requiring such services to pay publishers to use small snippets of text.

    Google has indeed shut down the homepage of Google News in Spain, but as detailed earlier, you can still access Spanish Google News via web searches, which provide news results and a link to additional results via Google News. As of the time of this writing, the actual service is still up and running even if the main page has been replaced by an explanation of the service’s closure.

    It would appear that this is still enough to put a major dent in publishers’ traffic. GigaOm is reporting this to be the case, citing data from ChartBeat.

    Josh Schwartz, the chief data scientist at Chartbeat, said the company doesn’t track every Spanish news site or publisher, but it has enough data on them as a group to indicate just how dramatic the traffic decline was. The service tracks about 50 sites, he said, ranging from small media outlets to the largest newspaper publishers, and looking at the data shows “a pretty massive difference” in traffic compared to a similar day before the removal. On average the drop is between 10 and 15 percent (Chartbeat only includes traffic from clients who have consented to have their anonymized data used).

    The drop will presumably be even greater if Google stops showing news results altogether, which we should expect that it will, unless publishers are able to convince the government to allow Google to keep the service running. Ironically, they are currently trying to do just that.

    Image via Google

  • Should Google News Be Shut Down In Spain?

    Publishers aren’t fond of the idea of not having Google News to send them traffic, it would seem. Who knew? Last week, Google announced it would shut down Google News in Spain on December 16. The day is here, and as of the time of this writing, the site is operational, but it may be gone soon. The company’s hand was forced by legislation in that country requiring news aggregation services like Google News to pay publishers for using small snippets of content.

    Should Google be forced to pay publishers or shut down Google News? Do you agree with this law? Should it be implemented in other countries? Should publishers just be grateful for the traffic they get? Share your thoughts on the issue in the comments.

    The law is similar to one in Germany that ensured publishers could charge services like Google for doing just that, but the difference with the Spanish law is that publishers actually have to charge.

    You see, when the scenario played out in Germany, publishers eventually caved, coming to the realization that they actually relied on that Google traffic. Google wasn’t going to pay them for snippets, so it just wouldn’t index those who wanted to charge. Minds were changed.

    Minds have also changed in Spain, but given the different nature of the law, a reversal might not be as easy. The Spanish Report reports that the Spanish Newspaper Publishers’ Association (AEDE) wants the Spanish government and EU competition authorities to stop Google from closing Google News. The publication writes:

    The Spanish Newspaper Publishers’ Association (AEDE) issued a statement last night saying that Google News was “not just the closure of another service given its dominant market position”, recognising that Google’s decision: “will undoubtedly have a negative impact on citizens and Spanish businesses”.

    “Given the dominant position of Google (which in Spain controls almost all of the searches in the market and is an authentic gateway to the Internet), AEDE requires the intervention of Spanish and community authorities, and competition authorities, to effectively protect the rights of citizens and companies”.

    Keep in mind, this is the group that lobbied the government for such a law in the first place. Apparently they didn’t expect Google to actually pull the plug. Now they seem to be panicking.

    Last week, Richard Gingras, Head of Google News, said:

    As Google News itself makes no money (we do not show any advertising on the site) this new approach is simply not sustainable. So it’s with real sadness that on 16 December (before the new law comes into effect in January) we’ll remove Spanish publishers from Google News, and close Google News in Spain.

    For centuries publishers were limited in how widely they could distribute the printed page. The Internet changed all that — creating tremendous opportunities but also real challenges for publishers as competition both for readers’ attention and for advertising Euros increased. We’re committed to helping the news industry meet that challenge and look forward to continuing to work with our thousands of partners globally, as well as in Spain, to help them increase their online readership and revenues.

    We’ve yet to see any comment from Google in light of this new news, and it remains to be seen if the government will indeed intervene again to keep Google News alive in the country.

    Currently, Google News is still operational from Google.es. If you go to the main Google News page, it presents the user with Google’s message about shutting down, but if you perform a regular Google search that lends itself to news, you still get news results within the regular search results, and can click through to the Spanish version of Google News like normal (h/t: Greg Sterling). This is likely how most people use the service as it is.

    This could very well go away soon, but we have to wonder if Google is in talks with the government in light of the publisher group’s recent comments. After all, they would be the beneficiaries of the law, so the law has little reason for existing if it doesn’t cater to those it’s supposed to protect.

    Do you think Google News will ultimately remain in operation in Spain, or do you expect it to actually be gone for good? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via Google