WebProNews

Tag: Marketers

  • Avast Caught Selling Detailed Browsing History to Marketers

    Avast Caught Selling Detailed Browsing History to Marketers

    Another day, another company abusing customer privacy. A joint investigation by PCMag and Motherboard has discovered that antivirus maker Avast, who also owns AVG, has been selling extremely detailed information about customer browsing histories to marketers.

    The company division responsible is Jumpshot, and it has “been offering access to user traffic from 100 million devices.” In a tweet the company sent last month to attract new clients, it promised to deliver “‘Every search. Every click. Every buy. On every site’ [emphasis Jumpshot’s,]” according to Motherboard.

    In fact, the level of detail the data provides is astounding, allowing clients to “view the individual clicks users are making on their browsing sessions, including the time down to the millisecond. And while the collected data is never linked to a person’s name, email or IP address, each user history is nevertheless assigned to an identifier called the device ID, which will persist unless the user uninstalls the Avast antivirus product.”

    The data is anonymized so that, in theory, it can’t be tied to an individual user. However, the device ID is where the trouble comes in. For example, all a retailer would need to do is compare the time stamp that correlates to a specific purchase against their records to identify the customer. It would then be a simple matter to use that device ID to build a complete—and completely identifiable—profile of that person. With their entire browsing history, the retailer would know everything about what sites they visit, their habits, what their interests are and who their friends are.

    According to PCMag, Jumpstart even offered different products tailored to delivering different subsets of information. For example, one product focused on search results, both the terms searched for and the results visited. Another product focused on tracking what videos people are watching on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube.

    The granularity is particularly disturbing in relation to a contract Jumpstart had with marketing provider Omnicom Media Group, to provide them the “All Clicks Feed.” The service provides “the URL string to each site visited, the referring URL, the timestamps down to the millisecond, along with the suspected age and gender of the user, which can inferred based on what sites the person is visiting.” While the device ID was stripped from the data for most companies that signed up for the All Clicks Feed, Omnicom Media Group was the exception, receiving the data with device IDs intact.

    Much of the collection occurred through the antivirus software’s browser extensions, and Avast has since stopped sharing the data it collects through those extensions. However, the company has not committed to delete the data it has already collected. The company can also still collect browsing history through its Avast and AVG antivirus software, on both desktop and mobile.

    That ambiguity has not gone over well with Senator Ron Wyden, a staunch privacy advocate. According to both PCMag and Motherboard, Wyden said in a statement that “It is encouraging that Avast has ended some of its most troubling practices after engaging constructively with my office. However I’m concerned that Avast has not yet committed to deleting user data that was collected and shared without the opt-in consent of its users, or to end the sale of sensitive internet browsing data. The only responsible course of action is to be fully transparent with customers going forward, and to purge data that was collected under suspect conditions in the past.”

    The full read at either PCMag or Motherboard is fascinating and is another good reminder that nothing in life is free. Companies that offer a ‘free service’ are making their money somewhere—often at the expense of the customer.

  • Microsoft’s Mich Mathews Stepping Down

    Microsoft’s Mich Mathews Stepping Down

    Irony anyone?  This week, Microsoft is hosting “Imagine 2011,” a marketing leadership summit at its Redmond, Washington headquarters.  Late last night, Microsoft’s global marketing head announced she will be leaving the company.

    Mich Mathews, a former General Motors employee, has been with the company since 1989.  After working as a UK consultant for the company, she started full-time in 1993.  As she worked her way up through the ranks she was responsible for internal communications as well as advertising and public relations.  Currently, Mathews is responsible for over $1 billion of marketing for Windows, Bing and Xbox.

    She will be helping Microsoft’s COO and CEO find her replacement.

    In speaking to Ad Age, Mathews states that she made her decision over Christmas, and that she simply wants to break it up and start a new part of her life:

    “Twenty-two years in one place … I feel like I’ve done so much” and “frankly it’s time to do something new. It’s half a lifetime. Microsoft was chapter one and it’s time for a chapter two.  It’s going to be awesome to actually get off the grid.”

    She will definitely be taking a break for a while, and surveying her options.  “I am going to talk to a lot of people, return all those calls I’ve never returned, take the summer and dive into something probably around the fall time frame.”

  • Privacy Issues Holding Back Online Behavioral Advertising

    More and more marketers are shying away from online behavioral advertising (OBA) over concerns about consumers’ privacy, according to new report by the Ponemon Institute.

    The report, "Economic Impact of Privacy on Online Behavioral Advertising," found 70 percent of companies agreed behaviorally targeted advertising significantly increased marketing and sales performance, but most have limited their online ad budgets over privacy concerns.

    The majority (98%) of companies said they have restricted OBA because of privacy concerns, while 63 percent said OBA was their most effective form of marketing.

    Larry-Ponemon "These numbers are disconcerting both in terms of the percentages and the potential economic impact," said Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder, Ponemon Institute.

    "These data clearly indicate that, in spite of a belief that behavioral advertising is their most effective marketing channel, companies are holding back hundreds of millions of dollars from online marketing simply because of a lack of confidence that privacy concerns can be overcome"

    The study concludes that companies are clearly concerned with the protection of consumer privacy and are sensitive to consumer unease with online behavioral advertising. The study recommends that advertisers, regulators, and privacy advocates work together to better address privacy concerns through improved disclosure models, consumer education, and effective consent mechanisms.