WebProNews

Tag: Mark Zuckerberg

  • The Google+ Hall of Fame

    The Google+ Hall of Fame

    You’ve surely seen a Google+‘s most followed list by now, but someone’s taken the time and added some visualization to it, giving us the Google+ Hall of Fame. The pictures can even represent the standard HoF busts if you’d like, and that was probably the intention behind this little exercise.

    Pointed out on a post by Steve Rubel, the Google+ Hall of Fame page is a visual representation of the + accounts with the most followers. Naturally, the site is not affiliated with Google; instead, it’s the creation of Ralf Rottmann. It appears as if the information is pulled from Google+ using a JavaScript query, although, the data could be coming from the FindPeopleonPlus directory as well.

    @webpronews Chris, gpc.fm doesn’t use JavaScript to crawl Google+. It uses Python scripts and map reduce! Just FYI. 19 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    When the images are moused-over, the pop-up shows how many circles each person is featured in, which, in Google+ terms, is the same thing as being followed.

    Followers

    As you can see, Jesse Eisenberg reigns supreme with 403,000-plus followers. Meanwhile, the second-most followed person is Larry Page with 233,000-plus. Maybe one day, the most followed person on Google+ will, you know, post something. One can imagine it would be one of the most shared items in Google+‘s short existence — another thing people should keep in mind when discussing the shortcomings of the service.

    Facebook and Twitter certainly didn’t grow in one day. Or one month, for that matter.

    The Google Hall of Fame page also features a touch of class, for those of you who’ve been waiting for the women to show up. There’s a button that allows visitors to view the most followed women on G+. All hail Felicia Day and Marissa Miller, with 97,000-plus and 65,000-plus, respectively:

    Followers

    You can also tell the millennials out there haven’t caught wind of Google+, either. The Britney Spears account only has 13,000-plus followers. Further proof: only 52 people have the official Justin Bieber account in their circles. Oh, and Arianna Huffington has more followers than Spears, too.

    Clearly, the younger generation is largely ignorant of Google’s social media platform.

  • Facebook Launches Video Calling, Group Chat: Twitter Sounds Off

    We now know what Zuckerberg was talking about when he announced his “awesome” new thing last week. And no, much to the chagrin of millions, Facebook is not launching the dislike button.

    Rumors about the announcement ranged from the unveiling of a new iPad app to the launch of a new photo-sharing app for iOS. Reports emerged last Friday that Facebook would be partnering with Skype to bring live in-browser video chat to its 700 million + users.

    It appears as though the latter prediction is correct, as Mark Zuckerberg debuted video chat powered by Skype. The other two things that he unveiled were seamless group chat and a brand new chat design with an ever-present buddy list for easier connections. The buddy list will display the people to chat the most with, no matter whether they are actually online or not.

    The product announcement was advertised via global Facebook invite over the weekend. The event page linked to the Facebook Live page where the live stream was broadcast from Facebook HQ in Palo Alto.

    Zuckerberg said that this is “launching season 2011” and has been in the works for about 6 months. He also talked about the “narrative” of social networking and how it has been about active users and expanding connections to even more people.

    But the new way to judge growth isn’t about active users, he said, but about sharing. He added that Facebook had in fact hit 750 million users but they didn’t publicize it because that is no longer the metric on which they want to focus. 4 billion things are shared per day, and it is growing at a “exponential rate.”

    When asked bout his feelings regarding Google+, Zuckerberg said that Google represents an example of how companies that haven’t always looked at social are beginning to embrace it as important for the future. He also cited Netflix as an example of a company trying to incorporate social.

    Sure does seem like a pretty clear response to Google+‘s hangout feature.

    Some more on what Zuck said during the big reveal today can be found here.

    First, here are some reactions from the unimpressed part of the Twitterverse –

    So Facebook’s primary announcement is group chat and 1-on-1 video calling inside Facebook. Not exactly “awesome.” 18 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    Facebook video chat? I didn’t know it was 2005 already #fb 17 minutes ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto

    Facebook video chat, when it becomes mobile, let me know. 6 minutes ago via Twitter for Android · powered by @socialditto

    I love how facebook keeps talking about gandpa being able to video chat. All they did was make facebook a lot more confusing for grandpa. 7 minutes ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto

    so @facebook big announcement today was group chat and 1-to-1 video conferencing? is @google actually starting to pull ahead? #shocked 5 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    “Facebook can’t even get regular chat working, and now they’re integrating video chatting with it? LOL” – real talk from my roomie. 7 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Another trend on Twitter is “Zuck,” and people are giving him a pretty hard time for his public speaking chops –

    “And then we’re video-chatting…and it’s awesome.” – Zuck, you are too eloquent. #FacebookLive 34 minutes ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto

    Zuckerburg on Skype One-on-One chat in Facebook: “I just think this is super awesome.” Profound Zuck, profound. 3 minutes ago via Silver Bird · powered by @socialditto

    Zuck your cute and smart, but you’re boring the crap out of me. #facebooklive 2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    It’s quite true that haters always say more than fans on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, and the haters are out in full force on Twitter. There are plenty of excited users, however like this guy who is making use of the product already –

    Facebook video calling is working like RIGHT now. Did a video chat with two friends. 8 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    These people sure think it lives up to the “awesome” promise –

    Facebook skype ? Awesome! 2 minutes ago via Snaptu · powered by @socialditto

    The quality of video calling is awesome… #Facebook 6 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    What do you think? Does all of this qualify as the “awesome” announcement we were promised? Let us know in the comments.

  • Zuckerberg On Facebook’s Awesome New Things

    Facebook is currently holding a live announcement discussing the launch of three new Facebook integrations today, group chat, video calling (powered by Skype) and a new design for Facebook chat. During the product introduction portion, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg took the stage to introduce what he referred to as “Launching Season 2011.” During the opening segment, Zuckerberg took some time to discuss the vision surrounding the updates that were being announced.

    Essentially, social networking, in relation to getting people to join is not the primary motivation. From Zuckerberg’s perspective, the infrastructure is in place, Facebook is essentially ubiquitous with the public, and now, it’s time to build desired applications on top of the established infrastructure. He indicates this position by saying:

    The world generally believes social networking is everywhere. Over the next five years, the inflection is not on wiring the world, but on building cool apps…

    Understanding your position in the world is an important aspect, and Zuckerberg knows exactly where Facebook stands as an Internet property. With such a proliferation of Facebook users, he understands that sharing is now the focal point. According to his opening statements, sharing doubles on a year-to-year basis. For instance, this year, sharing is done twice as much as it was last year, and it’s growing on a yearly basis.

    In fact, sharing is the focal point for Facebook’s strategy going forward, if only because of how many people take part in it. During his comments, Zuckerberg revealed that “4 billion items are shared every day,” and now, Facebook wants to leverage and/or build tools that streamline the process. Furthermore, he stated that “sharing is growing faster than user growth,” and that sharing per person is growing even more. To Facebook, this is perhaps the most important metric in regards to what creations to concentrate on. From here, Zuckerberg proceeded to introduce the new products that are available now.

    Concerning the three products discussed, Zuckerberg offered his thoughts. Regarding the group chat feature, it’s pretty simple. According to the Facebook founder, “a lot of people asked for it,” and so, here we are. Because so many Facebook members are active in various groups, adding such a feature — which is activated by clicking a member and “adding” them to the chat — is an obvious move. The same applies to video chat, which is powered by Skype, although, Facebook users don’t have to have the software installed to enjoy it. As for the chat redesign, Facebook’s developers want to make use of the widescreen resolutions so many computer users have now, and if you have such a display, a freestanding buddy list will appear, allowing users to access the chat functions that much easier.

    These additions are about what people expected as the rumor mill churned, waiting for the announcement to become official. As for future applications, Zuckerberg revealed Facebook would rather rely on independent entrepreneurs who focus solely on app development to create upcoming Facebook apps. The reason for this has to do with focus. Facebook would rather focus on building a solid infrastructure that allows developers to build additional applications. Zuckerberg believes people who focus solely on application development would do a better job than large companies who have a great deal on their plates.

    Was that a subtle slam of Apple and/or Google?

    From there, Zuckerberg turned the proceedings over to his developers, who discussed the functionality of the new features. Essentially, the goal is this: Facebook has a lot of people who share and communicate via the Facebook platform and therefore, the new features will try to improve how users do things. Outside of that, independent developers will be looked at to increase the functionality beyond Facebook’s current strategy.

  • Facebook Blocks Google + Friend Exporter Extension

    Is this where the battle lines between Facebook and Google + are being drawn at? Is this the kind of response we can expect every time a developer creates a utility that exports existing Facebook contacts to the Google + environment? For some background, an up-and-coming web developer created a Google Chrome extension that allowed users to export contact information from Facebook to Google’s “why won’t you let us in” social platform.

    The extension, called, oddly enough, the Facebook Friend Exporter, did exactly what the title said it did. That is, until Facebook started blocking the extension from accessing its data. The developer in question, Mohamed Mansour, posted an explanation of why his creation stopped working:

    CRITICAL UPDATE:

    Facebook is trying so hard to not allow you to export your friends. They started to remove emails of your friends from your profile by today July 5th 2011. It will no longer work for many people.

    New version with a different design is currently deploying. You might have to do exports daily. It uses a different approach, and I will maintain this version. Just bear with me.

    While Mansour should be commended for his attempt at a workaround, should Facebook be receiving some guff for their strong-armed tactics in relation to Google +? Furthermore, is Facebook setting themselves up for some anti-trust issues by blocking an extension that populates another social media platform? Does that remove the natural competitive balance businesses are bound by? Or is Facebook finally protecting its users by enforcing some privacy standards?

    According to ZDNet, there are additional ways to import the desired data — the methods look a little bit like work — as Mansour pointed out the extension’s page, the desired data belongs to the users, not Facebook:

    Get *your* data contact out of Facebook, whether they want you to or not. You gave them your friends and allowed them to store that data, and you have right to take it back out! Facebook doesn’t own my friends.

    Clearly, Facebook and Mansour disagree on what belongs to the user and what belongs to Facebook. While your friends don’t “belong” to Facebook, apparently, the data they’ve entered does, at least according to those who blocked the Facebook Friend Exporter extension. With that in mind, it’s hard not to wonder how Mark Zuckerberg, who is the current king of Google +, at least in relation to the amount of friends in his various circles, populated his Google + account, and if he imported existing Facebook contacts into his Google + profile.

    Reaction to the extension block is about what one would expect: does Facebook’s actions officially kick-off the “Google + versus Facebook” war?

    RT @jorgemlee: Facebook is scared of migration to Google+, blocks export plugin. http://ow.ly/5wVZ2 38 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    … And the animosity between Google+ and Facebook begins: Facebook blocks friend exporter plugin http://on.mash.to/kR2S2Q #socialmedia 55 minutes ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    Who owns my life? | Facebook Blocks Friend Exporter Plugin http://ow.ly/5wUvo 59 minutes ago via HootSuite · powered by @socialditto

    Apparently, the answer to James’ question is “not you. At least not in regards to social media information.”

    Looks like Facebook are worried about Google+ if they’re blocking the Chrome extension to migrate your contacts http://t.co/S3XEMr1 1 hour ago via Twitter for Mac · powered by @socialditto

    FaceBook trying to block export of Friend details: The unacceptable side of capitalism? http://on.mash.to/kR2S2Q 2 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    The last featured tweet offers a perspective not often seen in the United States, and it gives good insight into how other parts of the world view these back and forth actions between to of the more successful Internet properties. Did Facebook overreact or are they merely protecting users’ privacy? Is Facebook setting itself up for some anti-trust issues with actions like blocking the Chrome extension? Let us know what you think in the comments.

  • Mark Zuckerberg: Google+ King

    Last week, reports emerged that Facebook CEO and sustainability enthusiast Mark Zuckerberg had decided to scope the competition and join Google+. This, of course, prompted everyone to speculate as to the validity of said account.

    It turned out that the Mark Zuckerberg Google+ account was not the work of mischievous trolls but actually an authentic account. This information was taken from a Saturday post by Robert Scoble that discusses a text he received from Zuckerberg. Check out the post –

    I guess he’s right. Why should people be surprised that Zuckerberg would jump on Google+? Even if you drop the whole “check out his competition” angle, Google+ is the hot new lady in town. Even billionaire CEOs can’t be immune to curiosity.

    And people sure seem to be curious about Zuckerberg. According to the Google+ Statistics page, he has amassed more followers than anyone else on the new service. Yep, more people have assigned Zuck a circle than Google CEO Larry Page.

    Uh, awkward?

    As of right now, just shy of 35,000 people “have Mark in circles.” Just under 24,000 have decided to follow Larry Page.

    Other notable people near the top of the list are Robert Scoble at #5, Matt Cutts at #6 and TechCruch’s MG Siegler at #9. Everybody’s first friend on Myspace, former President Tom Anderson is currently 17th.

    Zuckerberg has yet to post anything but has added 68 people to his circles. His about section reads “I make things.”

    What does all of this say about our obsession with Mark Zuckerberg? Well, it appears that certain film about him didn’t damage his rep too much. He’s still a fascinating figure to many. And I’m sure he will continue to reign atop the Google+ follower leaderboard, that is, until Lady Gaga joins.

  • Facebook’s Awesome New Thing: Skype-Powered Video Chat?

    Not to be outdone by Google and all the buzz (no pun intended) surrounding their brand new social project, Google +, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made an announcement of his own yesterday.

    Speaking to reporters at Facebook’s Seattle office, Zuckerberg said that his company would “launch something awesome” next week.

    What is this awesome thing that will blow us all away next week? Speculations ranged from the debut of the new Facebook app for the iPad to the launch of the much talked about Facebook photo-sharing app for iPhone.

    Today, some people received a vague invitation from Facebook that simply asked them to “please join us for an event at Facebook.” It is said to be an invite-only event and that space is limited. Here’s what the invite looks like –

    Those chat bubbles now make a lot of sense, as TechCrunch is reporting that Facebook plans to launch in-browser video chat powered by Skype. They base this on a source with “knowledge of the partnership.”

    The product has been built on Skype and will include a desktop component. It’s not clear to me whether that means it will just work if a user has Skype already installed on the computer, or if additional software will need to be downloaded even if the user already uses Skype. But from the user’s perspective, the product will be an in browser experience.

    Apparently this is not the entirety of Facebook’s huge new project, but definitely a part of it.

    This could be huge for both Facebook and Skype. Skype will now have access to a Facebook user base that more than quadruples its own. Facebook will look to make its service even more inclusive with seamless video chat that is launched straight from the page.

    And of course, Skype serves as a link between Facebook and Microsoft, who bought the service back in May.

  • Did Mark Zuckerberg Join Google Plus?

    Did Mark Zuckerberg Join Google Plus?

    As the world scrambles around, trying to get a Google Plus invitation — what, are you above eBay or something? — a rumor broke about perhaps the most famous social media person in the United States joining Google’s currently-exclusive social platform. I’m referring to Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. Did the person who stands to lose the most to Google Plus infiltrate the enemy or is someone spoofing the public?

    More than likely, it’s a spoof profile, but then again, hiding in plain sight is an effective measure as well. The reports of the Zuckerberg Google Plus account appeared in a couple of British publications, with the Daily Mail going as far as to post a screenshot of the account in question:

    Zuckerberg Plus

    Naturally, spoofing Mark Zuckerberg, or, well, anyone for that matter, is simply a process of using the person’s name and likeness. The more famous you are, the easier these materials are to come by, quite obviously. Consider the unending amount of fake Twitter accounts, and apply that to a new service everyone wants to be apart of. With that in mind, it’s probable that the Zuckerberg Google Plus profile is a fake, but then again, there’s the hiding in plain sight angle.

    The Inquirer has similar ideas, but it’s their description of the Daily Mail that wins the day:

    According to the ‘isn’t she fat?’ and ‘oooh, look who’s in a bikini’ UK newspaper the Daily Mail, the account might actually be fake, and Zuckerberg might not actually have created a public profile on a headline grabbing assault on his business after all.

    So? Real? Fake? Is Zuckerberg sleeping with the enemy, or is someone, to quote our friends across the pond, having a laugh, knowing the account couldn’t be ignored?

  • Winklevoss Twins Give Up, Will Not File With Supreme Court

    Well, folks, our national nightmare may be over.

    Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, aka The Winkelvii, have decided to take the money and run. “After careful consideration,” they said in a filing yesterday, “they have determined that they will not file a petition” with the Supreme Court.

    And so the super-wealthy will now stop pestering the super-wealthy in order to try and become more super-wealthy. Sounds good.

    This news comes as a little bit of a surprise, as the Winklevii had proven up until now that they were willing to take their case in front of anyone that would listen. Back in January of this year, they officially revived the lawsuit against Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg. They claimed that the settlement that was agreed upon previously ($20 million in cash and $45 million in stock) was not good enough. They said that the settlement was invalid because Zuckerberg had failed to disclose higher valuations of his company.

    They took their case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, who decided that the original settlement must be upheld. The chief justice in the case said at the time that “at some point, litigation must come to an end; the point has now been reached.” We thought that was the end.

    But oh how naive we were to the Winklevii resolve! Unsatisfied with the Court of Appeals’ ruling, they demanded that the same court rehear their plea, this time with the full court present instead of the three-judge panel used to make the first ruling.

    And the court again rejected their request.

    At that point, the Winklevii announced that they would be filing a petition of certiorari with the highest court in the land. And we all began to speculate with abject horror whether or not the Supreme Court would choose to hear the case.

    But it looks like we may never get to see the beautiful bronzed Olympians in front of the court. Facebook’s Andrew Noyes had this to say about the Winklevii’s decision:

    “We’ve considered this case closed for a long time, and we’re pleased to see the other party now agrees.”

    He also retweeted this –

    Lol RT @omarg: Winklevoss twins drop their Facebook lawsuit, go back to pitiable, loser lives of being attractive, athletic millionaires. 12 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    Unfortunately, the Winklevii have yet to tweet about their decision. It’s a shame, as everyone around here thoroughly enjoyed their excellent use of the hashtag.

  • Mark Zuckerberg is a Better Writer Than Paul Ceglia

    In the case of the guy who says he owns 84% of Facebook, recent developments have come in the form of a motion for expedited discovery. Last week we told you about the “Declaration of Mark Elliot Zuckerberg in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Expedited Discovery,” where the Facebook CEO once again indicated that he did not sign the purported contracts with Paul Ceglia, who claims to own a substantial part of the social network.

    The crux of Ceglia’s argument revolves around alleged emails sent by Zuckerberg that entitle him to a large chunk of the company. These emails surfaced in April, many months after Ceglia initially came forward with the claim.

    Naturally, the position of Zuckerberg is that the emails aren’t authentic, and that they were faked by Ceglia. As part of the recent motion for expedited discovery, a linguist has filed a supporting declaration that claims the questioned emails were not written by Mark Zuckerberg, and he can prove it with grammar and syntax.

    Professor Emeritus and former Linguistics Department Chair at California State University Fresno Gerald McMenamin analyzed the questioned emails provided by Ceglia with actual email writings by Mark Zuckerberg. He compared 11 different “style markers,” various instances of punctuation, spelling and syntax, and came to the conclusion that “it is probable that Mr. Zuckerberg is not the author of the question writings.”

    It is important to note that no single marker of these nine differing features is idiosyncratic to these writers. However, these nine contrasting markers constitute a unique set of markers. It would be improbable to find a single writer who simultaneously demonstrates both the questioned set and the known set.

    Based on the contrastingly-distinct style markers which the questioned excerpts and the known-Zuckerberg writings demonstrate, as well as the presence of no more than two minimally-significant similarities between [the two], I conclude that the known writings of Mr. Zuckerberg demonstrate a sufficiently significant set of differences vis-a-vis the questioned writings to constitute evidence that Mr. Zuckerberg is not the author of the excerpted question references.

    So this leaves a couple of options. First, if the emails are actually from Zuckerberg, it would mean that he is a wildly inconsistent writer. Second, Paul Ceglia, when crafting the fake emails, could have thought that specific idiosyncrasies would make them appear more authentic (incredibly incorrect, if this is the case). Lastly, Paul Ceglia is just a bad writer.

    I say this, because the specific differences all have actual Zuckerberg writing properly, with carefully chosen punctuation and word usage. Questionable Zuckerberg writes more haphazardly.

    First, the questioned emails have poor apostrophe usage.  For example, they leave out contraction apostrophes in words like “doesnt.”  Possessive apostrophes are also missing, as in words like “parents” when used possessively.  The questioned emails also say “sites” when using it to mean both “site is” and that the site is possessive.  In the known Zuckerberg emails, he properly places all apostrophes.

    The questioned emails also have multiple instances of run-on sentences, while the known Zuckerberg writings do not.  The questioned emails also fail to use commas to separate if/then clauses, while the known emails properly use this comma 85% of the time.  When it comes to spelling and capitalization, the questioned emails say “back end,” “internet” and “can not.”  The known Zuckerberg emails say “backend,” “Internet” and “cannot.”

    Other differences include sentence opening words – the questioned emails use a completely different and more formal set like “Further,” “Additionally” and “Thus.”  Zuck’s real emails begin sentences with “Okay” and “Anyhow.”

    Among all the differences, there are two similarities, however. Both sets of emails use “Thanks!” as a concluding phrase. Both also begin various sentences with “Sorry.”

    Since Ceglia’s entire lawsuit is contingent upon the validity of these emails, this could be a huge blow to it. Putting the actual case aside, this is fun because the word nerd in me just loves a language breakdown and analysis. Plus, it’s interesting to know that Zuckerberg is a very formal email writer. Whoever wrote those disputed emails is not.

  • Facebook Alleges More Criminal Behavior From Ceglia

    A filing has been submitted to a U.S. District Court in Buffalo New York, signed by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, indicating that he did not sign the contract presented by Paul Ceglia, who says he is entitled to a big chunk of Facebook.

    The filing is actually a “Declaration of Mark Elliot Zuckerberg in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery”. Zuckerberg says that he did sign a contract, but the one presented by Ceglia is not it. In the filing, Zuckerberg says, “I understand that Plaintiff Paul Ceglia alleges that Exhibit A is an agreement that entitles him to partial ownership of Facebook, and that he and I signed this document on April 28, 2003.”

    “I did not sign the document attached as Exhibit A to the Amended Complaint,” he says. He also says he didn’t receive any such emails as previously presented.

    Here is the document (hat tip to AllFacebook):

    Facebook’s defense is essentially that Ceglia altered a contract and made up emails. The company also hired private investigators, which have apparently found that he was also involved with land scams, adding to other criminal behavior in Ceglia’s past.

  • Mark Zuckerberg, Hunter, Sustainability Enthusiast

    After creating the most popular social networking site in the world (or stealing it, according to the Winklevii), what’s a 27-year-old Billionaire to do? It looks like Mark Zuckerberg’s next task is to get in touch with his sustenance.

    According to an email sent to Fortune, Zuck is attempting to only eat meat that he kills himself, personally.

    This isn’t the first challenge that Zuckerberg has given himself. He says that “every year in recent memory” he has “taken on a personal challenge.” Last year, it was to learn Mandarin Chinese. The year before that, it was to wear a tie every day.

    Well, this new venture is a little more challenging than putting on a tie in the morning. From the email to Fortune:

    This year, my personal challenge is around being thankful for the food I have to eat. I think many people forget that a living being has to die for you to eat meat, so my goal revolves around not letting myself forget that and being thankful for what I have. This year I’ve basically become a vegetarian since the only meat I’m eating is from animals I’ve killed myself. So far, this has been a good experience. I’m eating a lot healthier foods and I’ve learned a lot about sustainable farming and raising of animals.

    I started thinking about this last year when I had a pig roast at my house. A bunch of people told me that even though they loved eating pork, they really didn’t want to think about the fact that the pig used to be alive. That just seemed irresponsible to me. I don’t have an issue with anything people choose to eat, but I do think they should take responsibility and be thankful for what they eat rather than trying to ignore where it came from.

    Zuckerberg and his girlfriend Priscilla have been cooking everything from seafood to fowl to porcine, all killed by his hand. He started with a lobster, moved up to a chicken and has now made his way to pigs and goats. And he’s not wasting the animals – he is eating the chicken hearts, liver and feet.

    On his private Facebook page he posted a note to his friends on May 4th that said “I just killed a pig and a goat.”

    I say good for you Mark Zuckerberg. I am in full agreement that people like to distance themselves from what they eat, and you really should know what you are eating. Ground beef isn’t made by the grocery store, it’s the muscle and fat tissue of a cow. Know what you’re putting in your body – right on brother.

    At least when he is killing animals, he is using them for his own survival. Don’t know if I can say the same about Dr. Bob Parsons of GoDaddy and his infamous elephant killing video.

    I wonder if Zuckerberg’s awesome and Facebook famous dog Beast will assist him on the hunt.

    Lead Image Courtesy of Beast’s Facebook Profile

  • Winklevoss Twins to File with Supreme Court

    It looks like Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss plan to take their case to the highest power in the land. In a press release, the Winklevii announced that they plan to file a Petition for Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court.

    It might be worth it to take a brief look at how the famous twins got to this point – submitting a writ to the top court in the country.

    Zombie litigators Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss decided in January of this year that their agreed-upon settlement of $65 million dollars with Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook was inadequate. The settlement, consisting of $20 million in cash and $45 in stock, was awarded to the twins based on their claim that Zuckerberg stole the idea of Facebook from them while they were all students at Harvard University. I know, I know – you’ve seen the movie.

    So the Winklevii say that the $65 million settlement was based on fraudulent valuations of Facebook’s value, and that the settlement should be much more. They asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Fransisco to release them from the settlement so that they could attempt to extract more from Zuckerberg.

    In April, that appeals court reached the decision that the Winklevii must honor the agreement and cannot pursue the matter further. The judge in the case said in his statement that “at some point, litigation must come to an end.” Upon hearing this news, the Winklevii decided to take their $65 million and be happy pursue further litigation.

    Just a week later, the Winklevii asked the same Federal Appeals Court to rehear their claim. Apparently, the first decision was made by a panel of only 3 judges. The Winklevii requested that their case be heard by the entire 11 judge panel.

    After that request, Tyler Winklevoss created some interesting hashtags on Twitter and a Taiwanese animation company blew the twins out of their canoe with canon fire from Zuckerberg’s warship.

    Yesterday afternoon, the court of appeals rejected their request to rehear the case with a full panel.

    Well, today it seems as though the Winklevii are going to attempt to take their case to the last appeals court they have left – the Supreme Court. They say they will file a Petition of Certiorari, which is basically a request for the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s judgment.

    From the statement:

    The first is the Court’s holding that a party who is defrauded into entering into a settlement agreement cannot challenge the contract on the ground of fraud. Federal and state courts have long held that a settlement founded on fraud must be set aside. The Court’s decision conflicts with that body of precedent.

    The second issue is the Court’s holding that a routine agreement to hold statements made in a mediation confidential bars proof that Facebook committed securities fraud in the mediation. Numerous federal precedents, and the text of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, hold that an agreement to directly or indirectly waive rights under federal antifraud provisions of the securities laws is void. The Panel’s decision conflicts with that body of precedent.”

    Of course the Supreme Court doesn’t have to reopen the case as they have autonomy regarding what cases they choose to hear. But I have a feeling that this Winklevoss thing isn’t quite over. And like a member of the undead that still retains part of its melon, the Winklevii are not at the end of the road. They’ve got one more try. And I know we are all hoping that they can finally get their (430th) day in court.

    [Image: Shaun of the Dead]

  • Why Did Facebook Disable Mark Zuckerberg’s Account?

    Is Facebook in the process of eating its own? Is some kind of mutiny against Zuckerberg occurring, or is this just a case of mistaken identity? If you answered “yes” to the last option, you nailed it because the Mark Zuckerberg being discussed is not the same one brought to life by Jesse Eisenberg.

    Apparently, if you share a name with any of Facebook’s inner circle, you run the risk of having your Facebook page deleted. Just ask Mark Zuckerberg. No, not that one, either. According to a report in the LA Times, an Indianapolis attorney who has the apparent misfortune of sharing the Zuckerberg name had his Facebook profile disabled. Was this a case of Facebook acting in a over-protective manner, disabling an account they mistook for a parody profile? Or are they insistent on making sure there’s only one Mark Zuckerberg account?

    The mistaken Zuckerberg offered his take on the matter:

    “I was originally denied an account with Facebook two years ago because of my name, and I had to send them copies of my driver’s license, birth certificate and Indianapolis Bar Assn. license just to get them to believe that I exist and to allow me to set up my page,” Zuckerberg told the TV station in a statement.

    Zuckerberg — no, not that one — goes on to say this isn’t the first time he’s had such an issue with Facebook, although, this is apparently the first time his account has been suspended, which brings up an interesting point: If they had issue with Zuckerberg’s name in the past, why did they wait until 2011 to disable his account? Heavy workload?

    To better plea his case of shared identity, the mistaken Zuckerberg created IAmMarkZuckerberg.com, which he uses to differentiate himself from the Facebook wunderkind. Here, Zuckerberg’s testimony continues:

    I tell you all of this to make this point: I have put a lot of energy into becoming an exceptional bankruptcy attorney and establishing my good name nationally. If you had Googled Mark Zuckerberg in 2004, you would have found me. No one else. Mark S. Zuckerberg, bankruptcy attorney. If you had repeated the search two years later, you wouldn’t have found me at all. Now my name isn’t mine any more. The website HowManyofMe.com claims that only 1 Mark Zuckerberg exists in the entire United States. Which one do you think they’re counting?

    As for the mistaken Zuckerberg and his Facebook profile, according to a quote from a Facebook spokesperson, the account has been revitalized (confirmed):

    “Our reviewers look at thousands of pieces of content a day that are reported to them and of course make an occasional mistake. When this happens, and we’re notified about it, we work quickly to restore the content. We have reactivated this person’s account and sent him an email apologizing for the inconvenience.”

    Apparently, Facebook doesn’t keep their reviewers up-to-date on these kinds of things, considering the mistaken Zuckerberg already discussed previous issues with Facebook concerning his name. Perhaps they should have a list of users who are “allowed” to share names with other, more prominent members.

    It might help alleviate these kinds of mistakes in the future. Lead image courtesy of the mistaken Zuckerberg and his site.

    Update:

    WISHTV.com has a video interview with the mistaken Zuckerberg:


    The following quote reveals just how many hoops the mistaken Zuckerberg had to go through just get his account:

    “I was originally denied an account with Facebook two years ago because of my name, and I had to send them copies of my driver’s license, birth certificate, and Indianapolis Bar Association license just to get them to believe that I exist and to allow me to set up my page,” Zuckerberg said in a news release.

    “We went through this for about 4 months,” he told 24-Hour News 8.

    Um, is a Facebook account worth that much trouble?

  • Winklevii Refuse To Let Facebook Suit Die

    Winklevii Refuse To Let Facebook Suit Die

    Call it the little lawsuit that could.

    Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss are making a career out of prolonging litigation, as they come out of a recent appeals court ruling unhappy, and with more requests.

    As most of you I’m sure are quite familiar with the saga, I’ll keep the synopsis brief.  The Winklevii claim that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg ripped of their idea when he created the social media giant.  Although Zuckerberg vehemently denies this claim, the two parties reached a settlement of $20 million in cash and $45 million in stock options.

    In January, the Winklevii decided that this was not enough based on undisclosed Facebook valuations and elected to turn down the original agreement to pursue more in compensation.  On April 11th, an appeals court ruled that the original settlement must be enforced, and the Winklevii cannot back out of it.  This seemed like an end to a long litigation process.

    Not so fast, say the Winklevii.

    The twins are now asking a federal appeals court in San Francisco to rehear their request to nullify the original settlement.  The April 11th ruling was made by a panel of three judges, and now the Winklevii want their motion to be heard by the entire court.

    Jerome B. Falk Jr., lead appellate lawyer for the Winklevii said this as quoted in the NYT:

    “This appeal is not about whether our clients would be better off keeping the settlement proceeds (which admittedly are substantial) rather than proceeding with their lawsuit against Facebook. That is up to them to decide; it is not a question for the courts.”

    Tyler Winklevoss, the tweetiest of the twins tweeted about the new request:

    here’s the latest…http://tinyurl.com/3wdneja #FightForJusticeContinues 22 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Note the exotic hashtag he created.  Further inspection reveals that only one other person has jumped on board that hashtag, with the tweet “LET ME DIE.”  This is not the first excellent use of the hashtag by Tyler Winklevoss.  His #WonderWhoTheHarvardUpperclassemenWere tag didn’t exactly take off.

    Cameron Winklevoss, who has about 300 less followers than Tyler (Boom! Take that), has not yet tweeted about the continued litigation.

    I, for one, sure thought this was over when Mark Zuckerberg demolished the kayaking Winklevii in a Taiwanese animation last week.

     

  • Facebook, Ceglia, Winklevii Get Animated

    Facebook, Ceglia, Winklevii Get Animated

    As you probably already know, there has been quite a bit of news this week surrounding Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg and the people claiming that he ripped them off.

    First, an appeals court judge ruled that enough is enough in the Winklevoss Twins’ case, and ordered that they must accept the original #65 million settlement that they reached with Facebook.  The next day, zombie accuser Paul Ceglia arose to file updated claims against Zuckerberg, saying that he did in fact own a majority share of Facebook and provided emails that supposedly confirm it.

    All of these things and more are tackled in a one minute animated drama of epic proportions crafted by NMA TV.  Next Media Animation TV is a Taiwan-based company that makes animated videos about current news stories and pop culture events.  In the past, they have brought you “Glenn Beck Goes After Google,” “Paris Hilton Nabbed for Cocaine Possession” and  “Rod Blagojevich’s Trial Ends in Hung Jury.”

    The latest, entitled “Facebook lawsuit troll claims he owns 50%” pits Zuckerberg and Ceglia as commanders of opposing battleships and the Winklevii as two rowers in a canoe devastated by the cannon fire of the Facebook ship (Mark Zuckerberg vanquished the Winklevoss twins!)  There are explosions, a courtroom scene and Ceglia naked in a barrel.

    Enjoy.

    The Facebook ownership “battle” has also stretched into the world of twitter.  As we told you yesterday, some in the Facebook camp spent most of the day tweeting  about “douchebags” and Tyler Winklevoss started a snarky hashtag that nobody followed.

  • Winklevoss Tweets About Zuckerberg Email

    Tyler Winklevoss, half of the Winklevoss twins, which have been in an ongoing legal battle with Facebook, posted a snarky tweet today, after news came out of Paul Ceglia suing Facebook and revealing alleged email exchanges he shared with Zuckerberg.

    One of the alleged emails from Zuckerberg to Ceglia reads:

    I have recently met with a couple of upperclassmen here at Harvard that are planning to launch a site very similar to ours. If we don’t make a move soon, I think we will lose the advantage we would have if we release before them. I’ve stalled them for the time being and with a break if you could send another $1000 for the facebook (sic) project it would allow me to pay my roommate or Jeff to help integrate the search code and get the site live before them. Please give me a call so that we can talk more about this.

    Winklevoss tweeted:

    #WonderWhoTheHarvardUpperClassmenWere
    In an e-mail dated Nov. 22, 2003, Zuckerberg allegedly told Ceglia: “I (cont) http://tl.gd/9q6ted 7 hours ago via TwitLonger Beta · powered by @socialditto

    Excellent use of the hashtag. Look at how many have jumped on board:

    Winklevoss Does the Hashtag

    The message does reflect a certain “fictional” movie starring Jesse Eisenberg and a pair of Armie Hammers.

    Coincidentally, the Winklevoss twins have been the subject of some Facebook twittering today, as well (from the PR department):

    Serious DBs RT @alisonrosenthal: #douchebags Winklevii Undaunted, Plan to Seek New Hearing [NetworkEffect] http://t.co/YnVxmSW 8 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    I really love the word douchebag. It’s so descriptive and useful for select individuals. 8 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    Randi Zuckerberg chimed in as well:

    Totally agree @brandee (re: douchebag) Got honked @ today. At 9mos preggo I was taking “too long to climb into my car” & guy wanted my spot. 3 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    One can’t help but visualize Armie Hammer sitting at a computer in an office finding out that Facebook has been name calling.

  • Zuckerberg and Facebook Follow Winklevoss Twins’ Ordeal with New Round of Paul Ceglia Litigation

    Remember Paul Ceglia, the guy who claimed entitlement to the majority of Facebook (84%)? His story was all over the web last summer. Now, he’s back, having filed a new suit against Facebook, this time bringing a high powered law firm in DLA Piper, and a stack of new emails with him. Apparently, he’s now claiming to own half of the company.

    The emails are allegedly exchanges with Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg taking place in 2003 and 2004. Business Insider has published documents outlining the exchanges. The basic story is that Zuckerberg answered an ad Ceglia put on craigslist to help build a site called StreetFax. Zuckerberg allegedly told him about a project he was working on called “the face book” and discussion about things like the domain name, and using source code for StreetFax’s search engine.

    It also references (without names) the whole Winklevoss ordeal detailed in the Social Network film. The alleged email regarding that, says:

    I have recently met with a couple of upperclassmen here at Harvard that are planning to launch a site very similar to ours. If we don’t make a move soon, I think we will lose the advantage we would have if we release before them. I’ve stalled them for the time being and with a break if you could send another $1000 for the facebook (sic) project it would allow me to pay my roommate or Jeff to help integrate the search code and get the site live before them. Please give me a call so that we can talk more about this.

    Of course Ceglia wasn’t mentioned in the movie, and Facebook says the emails have been fabricated, reportedly calling Ceglia a “scam artist” and “convicted felon”.

    The convicted felon part is actually well-known. He was convicted of criminal fraud related to a wood-pellet company.

    Just yesterday, he 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the Winklevoss Twins/Divya Narendra settlement of $20 million in cash and $45 in stock will be enforced, despite the group’s efforts to get more.

    #FightForJusticeWillGoOn
    Statement from our appellate attorney Jerome Falk: “The Ninth Circuit has affirmed the (cont) http://tl.gd/9pqcs0 15 hours ago via TwitLonger Beta · powered by @socialditto

    Here are some interesting tweets coming out of Facebook:

    Winklevoss twins lose Facebook appeal http://t.co/qi16i5w via @brisbanetimes 19 hours ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto

    Serious DBs RT @alisonrosenthal: #douchebags Winklevii Undaunted, Plan to Seek New Hearing [NetworkEffect] http://t.co/YnVxmSW 8 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    I really love the word douchebag. It’s so descriptive and useful for select individuals. 8 hours ago via Twitter for iPhone · powered by @socialditto

    Well, yesterday was a three ring legal circus. Wonder what today holds… #needcaffeine 2 hours ago via TweetDeck · powered by @socialditto

    Ceglia’s claims are still being held in a great deal of skepticism, considering that he waited 7 years to ever bring any of this up. And where were these emails last year? His criminal background hasn’t done much to help his reputation either.

    Still, there sure seem to be a lot of “betrayal” stories out there related to the founding of Facebook and specificaly involving Mark Zuckerberg. Aside from the Ciglia, Eduardo Saverin (as told in The Social Network), and Winklevoss/Divya stories, let’s not forget Aaron Greenspan, another Harvard classmate of Zuckerberg’s that Facebook settled with over “The Universal Facebook”.

    BI suggests that DLA Piper even taking Ceglia’s case lends some amount of credibility to the notion that the emails may not be fake.

  • Winklevoss Twins / Facebook Battle Over?

    Winklevoss Twins / Facebook Battle Over?

    Earlier this year, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss as well as Divya Narendra decided that the settlement they had reached with Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook was no longer satisfactory.  They elected to turn down the agreement in order to seek more from the world’s largest social networking company.

    As most of you have been following this story since the beginning and/or have seen the Academy Award nominated faux-documentary The Social Network, we shall keep the background to a minimum.

    While all of the players in this suit attended Harvard University, the twins (from now on known as Winklevii) created ConnectU, a social networking startup.  They claimed that Zuckerberg ripped off their idea when he created Facebook, and feel as though they are entitled to a large percentage of its worth.  Zuckerberg denies the claim.  The original settlement was for Facebook to pay the Winklevii $20 million in cash and $45 in stock.  In January, the Winklevii argued that Facebook did not disclose certain internal valuations, and therefore their payout should have been much larger.

    Well, today the battle may be over as the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the original settlement will be enforced.  As quoted in Reuters:

    “At some point, litigation must come to an end,” Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote. “That point has now been reached.”

    So, the Winklevii were ripped off by the callous Zuckerberg or they scored a whole bunch of dough for doing absolutely nothing – either way it seems as though the drawn out litigation might be over.  Sadly, there now may not be enough material for Social Network 2 :  The Legend of Zucky’s Gold.

    (Image courtesy of AP)

  • Facebook, Zuckerberg Sued Over “Third Palestinian Intifada” Page

    This week, we told you about the public outcry against a Facebook page titled “Third Palestinian Intifada.” Many, including the Anti-Defamation League, demanded that Facebook remove the page, as it promoted a violent uprising against Jews in Jerusalem on May 15th of this year.  Facebook was hesitant to remove the page at first according to the ADL, but eventually took it down.

    Apparently they didn’t take it down fast enough.

    Today, Zuckerberg and Facebook have been named in a lawsuit filed by Larry Klayman.  Dubbed a “one man litigation explosion” by Slate, Klayman has made a living by filing odd and sometimes frivolous suits against the likes of Hugo Chavez, Hillary Clinton and his own mother.  The lawsuit accuses Zuckerberg of intentionally delaying the removal of the controversial page  “on information and belief to boost their revenues and the net worth of Facebook, which they have been marketing through the ‘legally challenged’ firm of Goldman Sachs.”

    Klayman argues that in the time Facebook delayed removal of the page, its contents were spread rampantly across the internet.  Basically, the damage had been done, it’s “out there,” says Klayman.

    Klayman, who is half Jewish, uses The Social Network to paint a picture of Zuckerberg as morally defunct and says that he has acted against his own Jewish people for the sake of financial gain:

    “As depicted in the award winning film ‘Social Network,’ Defendant Zuckerberg in particular lacks strong ethical and moral character, having cheated his partners out of their shares and/or ownership in Facebook early on, for which he was forced to pay large settlements once sued. Now, for financial reasons, he has marketed, used, and allowed to be used, Facebook against the interests of his own people, the Jewish people, and Plaintiff.”

    Apparently he though the film was a documentary.

    Klayman asks that the defendants be unable to have any anti-Semitic pages operating on Facebook ever again, oh, and a cool $1,000,000,000 in damages.

    I’m no legal scholar, but I’m not convinced Mr. Klayman has a case.  Let’s just say I won’t be the least bit shocked when this turns out to be Klayman’s idea of an April Fool’s joke.  Full text of the brief below.


    110331-Fbook-Complaint

  • Email Lives: Even Mark Zuckerberg’s Dog Uses It

    Ok, this is admittedly silly, but in light of recent conversations about email being in danger because of social media services like Facebook and Twitter, it seemed worth mentioning – especially when you consider that Facebook has suggested in the past that email is “probably going away”.

    You may recall earlier this month when Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his girlfriend Priscilla Chan got a dog named Beast and created a Facebook Page for it (Beast currently has over 75,000 fans by the way). Beast has posted the above photo with the text, “Just writing some emails. Typical morning.”

    I’ve got to wonder if it is typically Zuckerberg updating Beast’s page. He and Chan are listed as the only page owners. It’s funny to think about the young billionaire sitting around posting Dog photos while his company is taking over the world in so many ways.

    Beast has been fairly active on Facebook. There have even been a great deal more updates made to Beast’s page than to Zuckerberg’s. Of course, he does have a reputation for keeping things casual.

    In January, Facebook began rolling out its own messaging service and email addresses more rapidly, after introducing them in November.

    “We don’t expect anyone to wake up tomorrow and say, ‘Ok, I’m going to shut down my Yahoo Mail account or my Gmail account,” Zuckerberg said when the social inbox was introduced. He later added that maybe one day people will start to say that email isn’t as important as it was before, though it “will always be a part.”

    A recent report from comScore and the Pew Internet Project found that people are still using email quite heavily – just less for casual conversation.  “Overall, when you look at how many teens have ever sent an e-mail, it’s most of them, so it’s still being used,” said Amanda Lenhart, senior research specialist with the Pew Internet Project. “It just isn’t used for communicating with people you’re primarily communicating with in your life, namely your friends, and it’s absolutely true that text messaging and messaging through social networks has supplanted e-mail messaging to friends.”

    Other studies have found that social media services like Facebook and Twitter can help to drive email marketing.

    You can expect email to continue to grow along with mobile phone use as well. comScore recently found mobile email usage is seeing significant growth.

    It would also appear that more dogs are starting to adopt the popular communication channel.

  • Mark Zuckerberg Beast Dog Gets Facebook Page

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has a new dog that he shares with his girlfriend Priscilla Chan, and now the dog has its own Facebook page with thousands of fans (the number is already growing rapidly – it’s currently at about 3,400).

    The dog’s name is Beast, though he looks more like the Snuggle bear from the fabric softener ads. According to Beast’s page, he lives in Palo Alto with Zuckerberg and Chan, was born January 10, 2011, is a male, and his personal interests include: cuddlin, loving, and eating.

    “I am a Puli, which is a type of Hungarian Sheepdog. I was born in Grants Pass, Oregon and now I live in Palo Alto with Mark and Cilla. I am extremely cute,” his bio says.

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Beast the Dog

    Mark Zuckerberg Likes Beast the Dog

    Beast is sure to be the most popular dog since the Obamas’ dog Bo. In fact, if you go by the top ranking Facebook fan page for Bo, Beast already has him beat by a long shot.

    Some are calling Beast’s Facebook page a PR move to make Zuckerberg seem more likable. Can’t a guy just have a dog?

    Update: Since the time of this was originally written, Beast has learned to climb stairs (Breaking News!):

    BeastJust learned how to climb stairs. I'm such a champion.

    Beast also now has nearly 8,500 fans.