WebProNews

Tag: Mark Warner

  • Senator Mark Warner Wants to ‘Restart Antitrust’ Legislation

    Senator Mark Warner Wants to ‘Restart Antitrust’ Legislation

    After a contentious start for the new Congress, Senator Mark Warner is ready to “restart antitrust” legislation.

    The US has been increasingly trying to reign in Big Tech’s influence and power, but efforts have largely stalled. Senator Warner is determined to get the process going again.

    “Let’s restart antitrust,” Warner (D., Va.) told MarketWatch on Monday. “Lessons were learned [in 2022] and we can break through with kids legislation. Can’t we at least agree on kids safety?”

    In particular, Senator Warner wants to take aim at Section 230, the legislation that protects online platforms from legal liability resulting from the speech or actions of their users.

    “Section 230 has been this vast, get-out-of-jail free card,” Warner said,

    Warner also indicated improved interoperability between online platforms could be a main goal, as well preventing Big Tech companies from preferring their own products and services over those of competitors.

    The EU has already unveiled its Digital Markets Act (DMA) that achieves much of what Warner hopes to. Only time will tell if the US can pass similar legislation.

  • Lawmakers Propose $22.8 Billion to Boost US-Based Semiconductor Business

    Lawmakers Propose $22.8 Billion to Boost US-Based Semiconductor Business

    A bipartisan group of lawmakers has unveiled a bill aimed at using more than $22.8 billion to help bring more semiconductor manufacturing to the US.

    US officials have become increasingly concerned over the lack of US-based semiconductor manufacturing. In recent decades, the vast majority of the industry has moved overseas. The coronavirus has demonstrated the danger of relying on overseas production for components that are critical to so many industries. As the pandemic took a toll on China, American companies struggled to keep up with demand as a result of impacted supply chains.

    One of the first steps toward semiconductor independence was a deal reached with TSMC to build a $12 billion facility in Arizona. As the primary chip provider for Apple’s iPhones and iPads, as well as other tech companies, a US-based TSMC plant would help insulate supply chains from future disruptions.

    In the bill unveiled by US Senators John Cornyn and Mark Warner, as well US Representatives Doris Matsui and Michael McCaul, more than $22.8 billion will be used to bring even more semiconductor manufacturing to the US.

    “Semiconductors underpin nearly all innovation today and are critical to U.S. communications and defense computing capabilities. While Texas has been a leader in manufacturing this technology and the U.S. leads the world in chip design, most of those chips are manufactured outside the United States,” said Sen. Cornyn. “This legislation would help stimulate advanced semiconductor manufacturing capabilities domestically, secure the supply chain, and ensure U.S. maintains our lead in design while creating jobs, lowering our reliance on other countries for advanced chip fabrication, and strengthening national security.”

    “America’s innovation in semiconductors undergirds our entire innovation economy, driving the advances we see in autonomous vehicles, supercomputing, augmented reality, IoT devices and more. Unfortunately, our complacency has allowed our competitors – including adversaries – to catch up. This bill reinvests in this national priority, providing targeted tax incentives for advanced manufacturing in the US, funding basic research in microelectronics, and emphasizing the need for multilateral engagement with our allies in bringing greater transparency and attention to security and integrity threats to the global supply chain,” said Sen. Warner.

    Should the bill pass, it should provide a significant stimulus to US semiconductor efforts.

  • Google Backtracks on Misleading Search Results

    Google Backtracks on Misleading Search Results

    Google is apparently walking back a recent search redesign that made it difficult to distinguish ads from organic results, according to TechCrunch.

    Google was in the news recently for blurring the line between organic search results and ads, making it difficult to distinguish between the two. The move was important because Google only makes money when users click on ads, as opposed to organic results. Therefore, it’s in the company’s interest for users to click on as many ads, or sponsored links, as possible.

    The move did not sit well with anyone, however, with consumers, journalists and politicians alike slamming the search giant. As TechCrunch points out, Senator Mark Warner told the Washington Post:

    “We’ve seen multiple instances over the last few years where Google has made paid advertisements ever more indistinguishable from organic search results. This is yet another example of a platform exploiting its bottleneck power for commercial gain, to the detriment of both consumers and also small businesses.”

    The company has now acknowledged, via Twitter, that it needs to go back to the drawing boards to deliver an update that addresses user concern.

    “Here’s our full statement on why we’re going to experiment further. Our early tests of the design for desktop were positive. But we appreciate the feedback, the trust people place in Google, and we’re dedicating to improving the experience.”

    —Google SearchLiaison (@searchliaison) January 24, 2020

  • Facebook Emotion Experiment Prompts Senator’s Letter To FTC

    Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.) has written a letter to the Federal Trade Commission regarding Facebook’s controversial emotion experiment, seeking to have the commission examine the ordeal.

    “I come from the technology world, and I understand that social media companies are looking for ways to extract value from the information willingly provided by their huge customer base,” said Warner. “I don’t know if Facebook’s manipulation of users’ news feeds was appropriate or not. But I think many consumers were surprised to learn they had given permission by agreeing to Facebook’s terms of service. And I think the industry could benefit from a conversation about what are the appropriate rules of the road going forward.”

    Actually, as others have pointed out, Facebook didn’t even have the language in question in its terms of service at the time of the experiment. It was added later.

    The language may have changed, but Facebook told Forbes thist:

    “When someone signs up for Facebook, we’ve always asked permission to use their information to provide and enhance the services we offer. To suggest we conducted any corporate research without permission is complete fiction. Companies that want to improve their services use the information their customers provide, whether or not their privacy policy uses the word ‘research’ or not.”

    Here’s Warner’s letter (via AllFacebook):

    Warner Letter to FTC 7 9 14 by Mark Warner

    Facebook’s experiment has also drawn interest from the Information Commissioner’s Office in the UK, who is investigating the company.

    Various Facebook executives have defended the study, while acknowledging that they could have better communicated about it.

    Image via Senate.gov