WebProNews

Tag: Jeff Dean

  • Google Reorganizing Labor to Answer ChatGPT

    Google Reorganizing Labor to Answer ChatGPT

    Google has issued a “code red” and is reorganizing labor in response to the traction ChatGPT has gained.

    ChatGPT is an AI-driven chatbot released by OpenAI. The chatbot has gained considerable traction and praise, while still receiving criticism for failing in many of the same ways as previous chatbots.

    Google is one company that is trying to find an answer. When ChatGPT gained traction, the company held an all-hands meeting to address employee concerns that Google was being upstaged and could lose its competitive edge. Executives emphasized their desire to proceed slowly, lest the company’s reputation be hurt by less than stellar results.

    According to Business Insider, Google appears to be taking significant steps to catch up. CEO Sundar Pichai has been involved in meetings that have resulted in a reorganization of labor. Personnel in Google’s research, Trust and Safety division are being tasked with assisting in AI development. Other divisions have been similarly involved.

    The company will have to strike a fine balance between protecting the integrity of its search business while simultaneously keeping up with the broader AI industry.

    “This really strikes a need that people seem to have but it’s also important to realize these models have certain type of issues,” Google AI head Jeff Dean said in the initial all-hands meeting.

  • Google Moving Slowly on AI Chatbots Over ‘Reputational Risk’

    Google Moving Slowly on AI Chatbots Over ‘Reputational Risk’

    Amid the ruckus over OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google execs have made it clear they are in no hurry to jump on the chatbot bandwagon.

    ChatGPT is one of OpenAI’s most well-known innovations and has gained widespread recognition. According to CNBC, Google employees expressed concerns about ChatGPT, especially given Microsoft’s backing of OpenAI. Given Google’s background in AI, employees were concerned the company could be falling behind.

    “Is this a missed opportunity for Google, considering we’ve had Lamda for a while?” read one top-rated question at a company all-hands meeting.

    In response to, CEO Sundar Pichai and Google AI head Jeff Dean emphasized that Google already has similar capabilities as OpenAI and ChatGPT, but that the company needed to be extra careful since so many people rely on Google for quality answers.

    “This really strikes a need that people seem to have but it’s also important to realize these models have certain type of issues,” Dean said

    Interestingly, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman seemed to endorse Google’s caution, admitting ChatGPT was not production-ready.

  • Google AI Chief Ignites Firestorm Over ‘Marginalized Groups’ Tweet

    Google AI Chief Ignites Firestorm Over ‘Marginalized Groups’ Tweet

    Google AI Chief Jeff Dean ignited a firestorm of comments on Twitter by inviting “marginalized groups” to work with Google researchers.

    Jeff Dean was at the center of the controversial firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru, a world-renowned AI ethics researcher in late 2020. At the time, Google tried to pass the situation off as Gebru resigning, but she and her team made it clear she had been fired, over an issue of academic integrity. Gebru had co-authorized a paper highlighting the dangers of certain times of AI, including the type Google regularly uses. Gebru’s co-lead, Margaret Mitchell, was fired some time later, after her outspoken support for her colleague.

    Google has already faced severe backlash for its actions. Multiple researchers and engineers have quit, independent researchers have started turning down the company’s funding, the company was removed as a sponsor for a high-profile AI conference and its remaining researchers have petitioned the company to respect academic integrity, one of the pivotal points of contention leading to Gebru’s exit.

    With such a background, it’s hard to fathom what Dean was thinking with his recent tweet, in which he said:

    I encourage students from historically marginalized groups who are interested in learning to conduct research in AI/ML, CS or related areas to consider applying for our CSRMP mentorship program! We have 100s of researchers @GoogleAI who are excited to work with you.

    Needless to say, the reaction was swift and severe, with many Twitter users asking how he could possibly expect marginalized groups to trust Google after its actions. The criticism is especially notable since the company is accused of marginalizing a Black woman, and never taking responsibility, let alone attempting to fix it.

    The backlash appears to have been swift enough to cause Dean to remove his tweet, as it is no longer available at time of writing. 

    Google’s mishandling of this situation continues to be an astounding case study of what not to do.

  • Google Fires Second AI Ethics Lead

    Google Fires Second AI Ethics Lead

    Google has fired Margaret Mitchell, just a couple of months after its controversial firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru.

    Margaret Mitchell is a leading AI ethics researcher and co-led Google’s team for responsible AI development, along with Gebru. When Gebru was fired, something Google tried to pass off as a resignation, Mitchell was among the most vocal in her condemnation of the company’s actions.

    Mitchell was locked out of her company access in January, but not before she sent an email to Google condemning Gebru’s treatment.

    The firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru is not okay, and the way it was done is not okay. It appears to stem from the same lack of foresight that is at the core of modern technology, and so itself serves as an example of the problem. The firing seems to have been fueled by the same underpinnings of racism and sexism that our AI systems, when in the wrong hands, tend to soak up.

    Mitchell confirmed in a tweet Friday that she too has been fired.

    Google has blamed Mitchell for her firing in a statement sent to various outlets: “After conducting a review of this manager’s conduct, we confirmed that there were multiple violations of our code of conduct, as well as of our security policies, which included the exfiltration of confidential business-sensitive documents and private data of other employees.”

    The violations in question reportedly had to do with Mitchell using automated scripts to find examples of Gebru’s mistreatment.

    Interestingly, around the same time as Mitchell’s firing, Google’s AI head, Jeff Dean, issued an apology to Google staff upset by Gebru’s firing. Axios obtained a copy of the memo:

    I heard and acknowledge what Dr. Gebru’s exit signified to female technologists, to those in the Black community and other underrepresented groups who are pursuing careers in tech, and to many who care deeply about Google’s responsible use of AI. It led some to question their place here, which I regret.

    Many, including Dr. Gebru and other Googlers are not buying the apology, calling it a non-apology, and calling out the timing as an intentional effort to divert attention away from Mitchell’s firing.

    https://twitter.com/robruenes/status/1362891169907281922?s=20

    Similarly, Google appointed Dr. Marian Croak to lead the company’s responsible AI development efforts Thursday, just one day before Mitchell’s firing. Critics viewed Croak’s appointment as another thinly veiled attempt to draw attention away from accusations of racism and misogyny.

    Given Google’s decisions — or more accurately, their inability to make a good one in this situation — many find it more than a little concerning that one of the biggest AI developers seems to have utterly lost its way in the ethics department.

  • Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Criticized For Response to AI Researcher’s Exit

    Google CEO Sundar Pichai has sent an email to Google employees in an effort to address backlash the company is facing over Dr. Timnit Gebru’s exit.

    Timnit Gebru is one of the leading artificial intelligence ethics researcher in the world, widely respected for her expertise. An issue arose as a result of a research paper Gebru and other researchers were working on. The paper tackled the ethical issues with large-scale AI language models (LLMs), and was approved internally on October 8. According to Gebru, she was later asked to remove her name from the paper because an internal review found it to be objectionable.

    As Gebru later pointed out in an interview with Wiredresearchers must be free to go where the research takes them.

    You’re not going to have papers that make the company happy all the time and don’t point out problems. That’s antithetical to what it means to be that kind of researcher.

    Google’s head of AI, Jeff Dean, said the paper was not submitted with the necessary two-week lead time. Gebru’s team, however, wrote in a blog post supporting Gebru that “this is a standard which was applied unevenly and discriminatorily.”

    As a result, Gebru gave her supervisors some conditions she wanted met, otherwise she would work toward an amicable exit from the company. According to her team, the conditions “were for 1) transparency around who was involved in calling for the retraction of the paper, 2) having a series of meetings with the Ethical AI team, and 3) understanding the parameters of what would be acceptable research at Google.”

    Instead of working with Gebru, her supervisors accepted her “resignation” effective immediately. Gebru’s team is quick to point out that “Dr. Gebru did not resign,” (italics theirs) and was instead terminated.

    The company’s actions brought swift and vocal backlash. Some 2,351 Googlers, along with 3,729 supporters in academia, industry and civil society have signed a petition in support of Gebru at the time of writing. It seems Pichai and Company realize the situation is not going away without being addressed.

    In an email to employees, first published by Axios, Pichai attempted to do damage control, apologizing for what happened and vowing to do better in the future.

    So far, the email has not been met with praise. Gebru took to Twitter to criticize the lack of accountability, as well as the insinuation she was an “angry Black woman” for whom a de-escalation strategy was needed.

    Similarly, others are criticizing Pichai’s email for essentially being tone-deaf. Jack Clark, Open AIPolicy Director, is one such voice.

    In our initial coverage of this situation, we stated: “It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation.”

    In the aftermath of Pichai’s email, that statement continues to ring true.

    Here’s the email in full:

    Hi everyone,

    One of the things I’ve been most proud of this year is how Googlers from across the company came together to address our racial equity commitments. It’s hard, important work, and while we’re steadfast in our commitment to do better, we have a lot to learn and improve. An important piece of this is learning from our experiences like the departure of Dr. Timnit Gebru.

    I’ve heard the reaction to Dr. Gebru’s departure loud and clear: it seeded doubts and led some in our community to question their place at Google. I want to say how sorry I am for that, and I accept the responsibility of working to restore your trust.

    First – we need to assess the circumstances that led up to Dr. Gebru’s departure, examining where we could have improved and led a more respectful process. We will begin a review of what happened to identify all the points where we can learn — considering everything from de-escalation strategies to new processes we can put in place. Jeff and I have spoken and are fully committed to doing this. One of the best aspects of Google’s engineering culture is our sincere desire to understand where things go wrong and how we can improve.

    Second – we need to accept responsibility for the fact that a prominent Black, female leader with immense talent left Google unhappily. This loss has had a ripple effect through some of our least represented communities, who saw themselves and some of their experiences reflected in Dr. Gebru’s. It was also keenly felt because Dr. Gebru is an expert in an important area of AI Ethics that we must continue to make progress on — progress that depends on our ability to ask ourselves challenging questions.

    It’s incredibly important to me that our Black, women, and underrepresented Googlers know that we value you and you do belong at Google. And the burden of pushing us to do better should not fall on your shoulders. We started a conversation together earlier this year when we announced a broad set of racial equity commitments to take a fresh look at all of our systems from hiring and leveling, to promotion and retention, and to address the need for leadership accountability across all of these steps. The events of the last week are a painful but important reminder of the progress we still need to make.

    This is a top priority for me and Google leads, and I want to recommit to translating the energy that we’ve seen this year into real change as we move forward into 2021 and beyond.

    — Sundar

  • Google In Hot Water After Firing High-Profile AI Researcher

    Google In Hot Water After Firing High-Profile AI Researcher

    Google is facing major backlash after firing Dr. Timnit Gebru, one of the world’s leading AI ethics researchers.

    Google has already been accused by the National Labor Relations Board of spying on and terminating employees unlawfully. The accusation stems from the company’s efforts to discourage unionization.

    Now the company has fired Timnit Gebru, a leading, well-respected researcher specializing in AI ethics. Gebru announced her firing via Twitter:

    As Gebru points out, and as Google has stated, the company says it fired her for sending an email to employees in the Bain group, an email that was “inconsistent with the expectations of a Google manager.”

    At the heart of the issue was a research paper Gebru was working on, a paper that received pushback. Gebru provided conditions that she asked Google to meet—in regard to the paper she was working on—otherwise she planned to resign. Rather than negotiate, the company simply accepted her resignation immediately, effectively firing her.

    At the same time, Jeff Dean, the head of Google research, sent out a lengthy email to Google employees explaining why the company chose to fire Gebru. The company blamed its actions on Gebru’s email to the Bain group, in which she detailed the struggles she had experienced as a Black women at the company. Gebru’s email to the Bain group, as well as Dean’s response can be read here.

    It appears Google’s employees aren’t buying the company’s line, not surprising given how well respected Gebru is. To date, over 1,000 people have signed a petition in support of her. In addition, Dr. Alex Hanna, also a Google AI ethics researcher, called out the company for its “chilling” actions against Gebru:

    It goes without saying that Google is providing a case study in how not to handle this kind of situation. Given the scrutiny the company is under, this is certainly not going to help their case.