WebProNews

Tag: IOC

  • USOC 2024 Determining Potential US Olympic Bid

    On Tuesday, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) expressed much interest in narrowing down its field of potential cities to make a bid to host the 2024 summer Olympics.

    “The dialogue is really around which cities do we think can put together a bid that is going to be a fantastic bid and which cities do we think have the opportunity to win… Before we make a final decision we need to get into fairly detailed discussions with hopefully a smaller number of cities so our objective is to be in that position within the next couple of months,” stated USOC chief executive Scott Blackmun.

    Last year, the USOC sent out 35 letters to the biggest cities in the United States to gauge the interests US cities had in hosting the Olympics once again.

    The list is expected to be narrowed to two or three finalists within the next month, with San Diego being the only city to have submitted a formal bid thus far.

    The United States has not hosted an Olympics since the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Utah and has not hosted a Summer Olympics since the 1996 games in Atlanta, Georgia.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z33rvWOh8N0

    Part of the reason the USOC has had issues in cementing a US Olympic bid was due to tense relations with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) over revenue sharing.

    In an open-ended contract created with the 1996 Olympic games in Atlanta, the USOC received a 20 percent share of global sponsorship revenue and a 12.75 percent cut of U.S. broadcast rights deals. When the US went to apply to host the 2012 Olympics in New York, it received a huge amount of backlash from the IOC due to the international community feeling that the US shares were excessive.

    In 2012, however, the USOC and IOC came together to enter into negotiations to settle the dispute. Since that time, Blackmun and the USOC have gotten back in the good graces of the IOC and have decided to submit another bid.

    “We’ve received plenty of encouragement from multiple IOC members about a bid,” USOC chairman Larry Probst said.

    At the current time, the leaders to host the 2024 summer Olympics in the United States are San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. and San Diego.

    Image via YouTube

  • India’s Olympics Ban Lifted By IOC

    India’s Olympics Ban Lifted By IOC

    India is back in the game, officially. After being suspended by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in December 2012, India has been reinstated in the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi.

    The suspension is a result of the country’s refusal to ban a corruption-tainted official, Lalit Bhanot, from running for elections in the Indian Olympic Association and consequently getting a top post. One of the requirements of the IOC is that persons who have been convicted or charged are not eligible to run for positions within the organization.

    Bhanot had been charged with corruption and had spent almost a year in jail prior to being elected to the Indian Olympic Association. The Indian association refused to abide by the changes demanded by the IOC, and the situation created a deadlock, extending up to the start of the Winter Games.

    When the Sochi Games started, the saffron, white, and green flag of India was not seen during the opening ceremony parade, but its three athletes were. The delegation, composed of luger Shiva Keshavan and two skiers, marched under an IOC flag.

    Before the Winter Games and knowing the situation they were in, Keshavan found a way to represent his country. And what better medium to wear his colors proudly than his uniform? A close look at the white suit shows not only the colors of the Indian flag, but the names of some of the donors who supported the luger.

    So what made the IOC end India’s suspension?

    On February 9, the Indian Olympic Association held a general assembly and elected a new set of officers. The IOC was in attendance to observe the proceedings, and the delegates reported that the Indian association complied with all of the Committee’s requirements.

    The lifting of the suspension means that Keshavan and his countrymen can now race under their own national flag and walk behind it on February 23, during the Games’ closing ceremony. The lifting of a ban of a national committee during the Games is a first in Olympic history.

    http://youtu.be/h4wFFB_AatM

    Image via YouTube

  • Sarah Burke Memorial Stickers Banned By IOC

    The International Olympic Committee is remaining firm in their decision to ban the athletes from wearing the Sarah Burke memorial stickers during the Olympic games.

    Burke, a Canadian freestyle skier, was killed two years ago, in January 2012, after sustaining injuries while training, in Park City, Utah. Since then, fellow athletes have been mourning her death, and wanted to wear a sticker on their helmets to honor their fallen friend.

    However, the IOC made the decision to ban the stickers, saying that they do not allow “political statements” to be made during competitions. IOC spokesman Mark Adams addressed the issue, on Monday, saying that they understand that she should be remembered, but they did not feel that this was the appropriate time or place to do so.

    “She really needs to be well remembered, I think, and absolutely, we want to help the athletes to remember her in some way and there are all sorts of things we can do,” Adams said. “From our side we would say that the competitions themselves, which are a place of celebration, are probably not the right place to really do that and we like to keep that separate.”

    Adams suggested that the athletes put together some kind of commemoration, and offered to allow them hold the commemoration at the Multi Faith Centre. “For us it is a question of what is appropriate and where would be the best place,” Adams explained. “As I say, we are very keen to help people who want to have a remembrance or do something and to do that in what would be the appropriate place.”

    Several athletes are not satisfied with the alternative option, and have taken to their social media accounts to voice their infuriation.

    “I ride with a Sarah sticker on my snowboard and helmet always,” Torah Bright, an Australian snow boarder, wrote in a post on Instagram. “The IOC however, considers Sarah stickers ‘a political statement’ and have banned them. WOW. Sarah is a beautiful, talented, powerful women, whose spirit inspires me still. She is a big reason why skier pipe/slope are now Olympic events.”

    Do you think the memorial stickers should be allowed? Leave your comments below.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Olympics Drops Wrestling From Its Core Sports Lineup

    The International Olympic Committee (IOC) today announced its 25 “core sports” for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games. Notably absent from the list was wrestling – a sport that has been part of the olympic games since the very first olympics in 1896.

    That doesn’t mean that wrestling won’t be an event at the Olympics, however. The sport will now have to compete with other “shortlisted” sports for inclusion in the 2020 games. Baseball/softball, karate, roller sports (inline skating), sport climbing, squash, wakeboarding, and wushu are other shortlisted sports that will make presentations to the IOC executive board at a meeting in St. Petersburg in May. Following that meeting the executive board will choose which of the shortlisted sports to include in the 2020 games.

    From an IOC statement:

    In an effort to ensure the Olympic Games remain relevant to sports fans of all generations, the Olympic Programme Commission systematically reviews every sport following each edition of the Games.

    The 25 core sports that will definitely be included in the 2020 games are athletics, rowing, badminton, basketball, boxing, canoeing, cycling, equestrian, fencing, football, gymnastics, weightlifting, handball, hockey, judo, swimming, modern pentathlon, taekwondo, tennis, table tennis, shooting, archery, triathlon, sailing and volleyball.

    The location for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games will be chosen in September 2013 at the 125th IOC Session. The candidate cities are Istanbul, Tokyo, and Madrid.

  • Four Olympians Lose Medals Over Steroid Use

    The International Olympic Committee (IOC) today announced that four athletes who competed in the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens will be stripped of their medals after analysis of stored urine samples revealed “adverse analytical findings.”

    Yuriy Bilonog, Svetlana Krivelyova, Ivan Tsikhan, and Iryna Yatchenko have all been ordered to return their medals and diplomas to the IOC “as soon as possible.” Bilonog, the Ukrainian who won the gold medal in men’s shot put, and Krivelyova, the Russian who won the bronze medal in women’s shot put, both tested positive for oxandrolone metabolite. Tsikhan, who won the silver medal in men’s hammer throw, and Yatchenko, who won the bronze medal in women’s discus throw, are both from Belarus and tested positive for methandienone metabolite. Both oxandrlone and methandienone are anabolic androgenic steroids.

    In addition to these four athletes, the IOC stated that it has one case still pending.

    The IOC and the World Anti-Doping Agency decided to re-test “a number” of samples from the 2004 Games after targeted testing based on intelligence and new methods of detection. The committee keeps urine samples for eight years after each Olympic Games so they can be re-tested when new detection methods are discovered or when new substances are added to the list of banned substances.

  • Olympics Committee Says Its Okay to Post Images

    Olympic Organizers are now saying spectators are allowed to upload photos from the London games, after originally saying that it was not okay to do so.

    The terms on an Olympic ticket read:
    “Images, video and sound recordings of the Games taken by a Ticket Holder cannot be used for any purpose other than for private and domestic purposes and a Ticket Holder may not license, broadcast or publish video and/or sound recordings, including on social networking websites and the internet more generally…”

    And the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) internet guidelines says:

    “Participants and other accredited persons can post still photographs taken within Olympic Venues for personal use. It is not permitted to commercialise, sell or otherwise distribute these photographs.”

    These instructions clearly say that images cannot be broadcast, published, or otherwise distributed. That pretty much eliminates social media posts.

    But The @London2012 official twitter account posted these messages a few days ago:

    (1 of 3) Social media info: anyone attending @London2012 events is welcome to take pictures in venues… 5 days ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    (2 of 3) …& it’s ok to share pics from venues on social media as long as it’s not to make money. We’re keen to see & share them!… 5 days ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    (3 of 3) …If you want to find out more about the @Olympics and social media, have a read of this: http://t.co/BIrMbTt6 5 days ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Which clearly say it is okay to post photos on social media.

    In reality, neither of these rules matter, because IOC officials will have no way of policing every attendee for pictures posted on their social media accounts.

    It would, however, be easy to find a person who is posting on a third party blog or online news publication, and that is what they are trying to prevent. People trying to make money by selling or distributing photos of Olympic athletes.

    The Twitter posts are most likely a PR move from the Olympic Committee, who realize along with everyone else, trying to prevent people from posting pictures on the internet is an impossibility.

    Besides, everybody knows NBC owns the Olympics and anything that happens while they are going on. No one is allowed to report the Olympic Games except NBC and their affiliates, who would like to own the media for the rest of eternity. Thank you.

    (I wonder if it’s okay to post that insignia for the London games? It’s also interesting to note, any image you see of the Olympic logo always has NBC’s logo above the Olympic Rings and is always much larger.)

    [Source: paidcontent]

  • Tweet Away, Olympians, Says IOC

    Tweet Away, Olympians, Says IOC

    Although it’s a pretty well known fact that athletes and Twitter have had a messy relationship in the past, the International Olympic Committee has decided that social media buzz would be good for the 2012 Olympics.

    Not only will Olympics athletes be allowed to use Twitter during the London games next year, but the committee is actively encouraging the practice. Here’s what the IOC has to say in their social media, blogging and internet guidelines for 2012:

    The IOC actively encourages and supports athletes and other accredited persons at the Olympic Games to take part in ‘social media’ and to post, blog and tweet their experiences. Such activity must respect the Olympic Charter and must comply with the following. Broadly speaking, the IOC wants people to share their experiences through social media. As a general rule, the IOC encourages all social media and blogging activity at the Olympic Games as long as it is not for commercial and/or advertising purposes.

    Athletes are also being warned that any content deemed vulgar or inappropriate could lead to actions as serious as the removal of Olympic accreditation (I’m looking at you, Phelps). This would basically kick them out of the games.

    The committee also outlines a specific format that they want all blogging and tweeting activity to take – autobiographical. They want the athletes’ tweets to comment on their personal experience at the games, not report on the games in general, as say a journalist would do.

    However, any such postings, blogs or tweets should be in a first-person, diary- type format and should not be in the role of a journalist – i.e. they must not report on competition or comment on the activities of other participants or accredited persons, or disclose any information which is confidential or private in relation to any other person or organization. A tweet is regarded in this respect as a short blog and the same guidelines are in effect, again, in first-person, diary-type format.

    As far as media updates to social networks? The IOC is now allowing photos to be shared. Videos can also be shared, but only if they are taken outside the actual venues. During the 2008 Beijing Olympics, photos and videos were strictly prohibited from being uploaded to social media sites and blogs – for copyright reasons.

    So it would seem that the IOC believes that the games can benefit from their athletes interacting with fans via social media. Although the IOC is being a little restrictive on the content, it still shows that they are embracing the new technology, especially Twitter.

    The debate surrounding athletes and Twitter use continues to rage. On one hand, some feel like Twitter is a great way for athletes to communicate with fans. They feel that there shouldn’t be restrictions put on the athletes by the commissioners of various sports organizations. On the flip side, people cite the foul-ups of people like Larry Johnson and Rashard Mendenhall to make the point that Twitter should be restricted.

    This weekend on ESPN radio in Chicago, NFL QB Donovan McNabb let the world know his feelings about the popular microblogging site – he’s no fan.

    First of all, I’m not a fan of Twitter. Nothing against their program or what they have, but as an athlete I think you need to get off twitter. All these social networks of you tweeting about you watching a game when you want to be playing in it, but you’re mad you’re not playing in it, so you’re gonna criticize someone that’s playing in it. I don’t believe that that’s the right deal. That’s not professional by any means and you know we are all in a fraternity, so if you see a guy who’s struggling this isn’t the time to jump on him or kick him while he’s down because that same guy will come against you and kinda blast your team out the water, so I think for an athlete to be ‘twittering’ is the wrong move. It’s one of those things to leave to the fans and let them comment on certain things, but athletes need to get off Twitter.

    If we can look past the fact that McNabb sounds like an old man railing against them crazy kids and their hippity hoppity and their World Wide Compuserves, he does make one interesting point. Tweeting out your feelings about team performance can do damage to the “fraternity” that he describes. But to say that “athletes” need to get off Twitter is quite the blanket statement.

    Although the NFL and NBA have had rules about Twitter in place for years now, other sports organizations have taken a different stance on the issue. Last month, UFC president Dana White announced that he would be giving bonuses based on how many Twitter followers his fighters amassed. He also announced prizes for the “most creative” tweeters.

    What do you think about athletes and Twitter? Let us know in the comments.