WebProNews

Tag: gTLD

  • Amazon Buys .Buy Domain for $4.6 Million

    Amazon Buys .Buy Domain for $4.6 Million

    In yeah that makes a lot of sense news, Amazon has reportedly purchased the highly-coveted new .buy top level domain, and apparently the company beat out Google in the process.

    Domain Name Wire reports that Amazon bought the .buy domain for $4,588,888. Other companies in the running in ICANN’s auction were Google and Famous Four Media.

    Google also lost out on another domain it was vying for – .VIP. That sold for just of $3 Million to Minds + Machines, a top level domain reseller.

    ICANN’s auction also had .tech up for bid – and it sold for the highest price, $6,760,000. Domain Name Wire suggests that this is probably either a record for a top level domain acquisition or pretty close to a record high.

    It is expected that these new domains will open up later this year.

    Considering a majority of Amazon’s business involves people buying stuff, .buy must’ve seemed like a no-brainer for the company. It’s likely that Amazon will register the most lucrative .buy names, and sell the rest for premium bucks. At least that’s what I’d do.

    Though Amazon now owns .buy, there’s one gTLD the company won’t have the rights to. In July of 2013, ICANN nixed Amazon’s attempt to own the .amazon domain.

    Domain Name Wire via The Next Web

  • ICANN Says Amazon Can’t Own .Amazon Domain Name

    ICANN finally wrapped up the application process for new generic top level domain names last year. The results of which are still far from over, however, as the nonprofit now has to sort through all the applications and decide who to award the new gTLDs to. Amazon and Google both applied for a lot of domains, but Amazon’s request for its namesake has already been rejected.

    The Wall Street Journal reports that ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee has rejected Amazon’s request for the .amazon gTLD. The rejection stems from the Committee saying its unfair for Amazon to control the gTLD. Some assume that this means South American countries objected to Amazon owning the gTLD for the river that runs through most of the continent.

    For many in the world, however, Amazon no longer refers to a river, but rather the multinational online retailer. With the .amazon gTLD, the retailer could offer “a unique and dedicated platform for Amazon.” Some potential examples could be music.amazon or movies.amazon. With those examples, you can see why Amazon would love to control the gTLD.

    Of course, trying to own the gTLD for a geographic location probably wasn’t going to work out in Amazon’s favor. South American countries would obviously want to use the .amazon gTLD for their own purposes, whether it be for tourism or conservation Web sites. Amazon might still be able to use the .amazon gTLD, but it won’t be able to exclusively own it.

    So, where does this leave other companies that sought to own their namesake in gTLD form? Well, Google isn’t exactly a geographic location, and nobody else can really claim to own the Google name. As far as I’m concerned, Google will probably be granted the .google domain name.

    It’s going to be interesting to see if Apple meets a similar fate to Amazon. It only applied for one gTLD – .apple. Like Amazon, the word apple isn’t exclusive to the company. I find it hard to believe that ICANN would hand Apple exclusive control of the .apple gTLD, but it’s possible.

    Speaking of which, Amazon isn’t entirely out of the game just yet in regards to the .amazon gTLD. ICANN can still vote to approve Amazon’s request for the gTLD, but the Wall Street Journal notes that its rare for the nonprofit to go against the rulings of its Governmental Advisory Committee.

  • Google Might Be Willing To Let You Use That .Fun Domain You Always Wanted

    Early last year, ICANN opened up applications for generic top-level domains. At the end of it all, it was revealed that Google applied for 101 gTLDs. Now more details are starting to emerge on what Google plans to do with them.

    CNET reports that Google sent a letter to ICANN last week about its intentions for the gTLDs it had applied for. Most of the letter is spent dispelling the fear that new gTLDs will stifle competition on the Internet by giving Internet giants like Google a distinct advantage on the Web over smaller startups and competitors. The most interesting part of the letter, however, is this one paragraph:

    After careful analysis, Google has identified four of our current single registrant applications that we will revise: .app, .blog, .cloud and .search. These terms have been identified by governments (via Early Warning) and others within the community as being potentially valuable and useful to industry as a whole. We also believe that for each of these terms we can create a strong set of user experiences and expectations without restricting the string to use with Google products.

    What this means is that Google recognizes some of the gTLDs it applied for would better serve the company if others could use them. In a report from last year, it was presumed that Google would be saving the above gTLDs for its own products, or perhaps leasing them out only to certain partners. This new revelation from Google seems to indicate that the company is willing to open these domains to the public.

    Of course, it should be noted that Google does not own these domains yet. Other companies, like Amazon, has also applied for many of these same gTLDs. That being said, Google is planning to do something with these domains if it can obtain them. The question now is what that something is.

    Most seem to think that Google will use these domains to enter the lucrative domain registrar business. Such a move would put Google in direct competition with Go Daddy and others offering similar services. With domains like .soy and .fun potentially on offer, who wouldn’t want to register through Google?

  • New ICANN CEO Lays Out The Future Of The Internet Under His Watch

    ICANN is sort of like the Justice League of the Internet. They are a NGO that’s dedicated to protecting the Internet from any one stakeholder from gaining too much power. They are the people behind the expansion of the gTLDs earlier this summer that led to Google and Amazon bidding over domain names like .book and .talk. The group now has a new CEO and he has a plan to keep the Internet like it always has – free of any one stakeholder’s influence.

    On June 22, ICANN announced that Fadi Chehadé was to become the next CEO of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Since the announcement, it was expected that Chehadé would take on the role of CEO starting October 1. That’s why it’s a surprise that he has announced his rise to the position of CEO starting today. He relieves Akram Attalah of his duties as interim CEO who will now return to his prior position as COO.

    “I have spent the past two months asking myself and many others from all over the Internet community worldwide the same questions,” said Chehadé. “How can ICANN work better with its stakeholders to bring all interested parties to the table to debate and agree how to improve the DNS? How can we ensure that all global citizens can share an open Internet which is sustainable and resilient?”

    Chehadé says that his plan puts stakeholders first. He will be amassing a team to help speed up Internet engagement across the world. He will also be expanding the roles of his key officers to help oversee the new initiatives from ICANN including the creation of multiple new gTLDs.

    ICANN will also be establishing many of its top brass in European regions to help “strengthen ICANN’s international engagement at all levels.” This includes Tarek Kamel, senior adviser to the CEO, who will be in charge of developing an effective strategy to boost Internet penetration in Africa.

    “I’ve spent the summer putting the right team in place – looking deep within ICANN and beyond to find the best mix of talents to help me to fulfill ICANN’s mission,” said Chehadé. “Frankly I am impressed and humbled by what these diverse leaders bring to the table. I’ve been fortunate to have great support from the ICANN Board as well as the staff and I know that we will be able to build upon the organization’s many achievements.”

    He will also be making many other departments report directly to him. Most corporations would rather have a supervisor below them to take care of the smaller details, but it looks like Chehadé is up for the challenge. Here’s hoping the new management can help prevent more incidents like those that plagued the gTLD registrations earlier this year.

  • ICANN Still Rules The Internet Whether You Like It Or Not

    If you know anything about the Internet, then you know about ICANN. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has power over the the most important parts of the Internet – domain names, IP addresses and protocol numbers. That kind of power comes with great responsibility and the US Department of Commerce agrees that ICANN is the only one capable of doing it.

    The Register reports that the US Department of Commerce has agreed to extend ICANN’s rule over the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority for the next three to seven years. The news was confirmed by the National Telecommunication and Information Administration last night. The most important part of the deal is that ICANN has retained the power to add and remove top-level domains as they see fit.

    The retention of that power is essential as ICANN recently hosted the largest digital land grab in history with companies from all over the world paying to own various generic top-level domains, or gTLDs. Companies like Google and Amazon applied for scores of domains to either use for their own purproses or lease out for individuals to run Web sites with the .soy domain.

    All of this doesn’t means that ICANN is free to as they wish with the entirety of the Internet like they used to. The NTIA published a press release that details the new regulations that ICANN must adhere as the overlord of the IANA.

    Based on input from the global community, NTIA added new requirements. Those include a clear separation between the policy development associated with the IANA services, and implementation by the IANA functions contractor; a robust company-wide conflict of interest policy; a heightened respect for local national law; and a series of consultation and reporting requirements to increase transparency and accountability.

    While some may not like ICANN’s approach to ruling the Internet, they are not alone. They have to work with multiple stakeholders from around the world to actually get anything done. It’s the kind of approach that has worked well for the Internet and maintains a level of equality for all who wish to surf the Web (local governments blocking access to sites notwithstanding).

    Besides, if you don’t like ICANN, you can at least agree that it’s better than the UN controlling it. Here’s hoping ICANN can keep it that way when the UN meets later this year to discuss a possible take over of the Internet.

  • Does Google Want To Get Into The Domain Provider Business?

    It’s no secret that Google applied for 101 gTLDs in ICANN’s recent yard sale. The company applied for all kinds of domains from .tech and .soy to the usual suspects like .google and .youtube. It seems that there might be more at play here beyond Google wanting to just start out strong in the Internet land grab race.

    CNET has dug up Google’s plans for its gTLD applications and it’s pretty surprising. It would appear that Google wants to offer up many of the domains it has applied for to the public. In that sense, Google would become a competitor to Go Daddy by selling the domains to places like .book and .shop.

    It makes sense for Google to walk this path when the other tech companies did not. Offering domains allows Google to have its hand in one more of the Internet’s cookie jars. Whereas Apple and Microsoft just want to have domains for their own personal use, Google is on track to becoming everything to everyone. Offering domains is just the next step in this strategy.

    As you can see in this excellent graphic from CNET’s James Martin, Google will be offering some domains to everybody, some to select parties and reserving the rest for its own internal operations:

    Google Wants To Get Into The Domain Provider Business

    We can ignore the Google only domains for now because it’s pretty obvious what they’re going to be used for. It’s far more interesting to speculate on the domains that will be used by all or select parties. Starting with the domains that will be leased out to anybody, it’s interesting to note that Google is offering things like .book and .buy while domains like .music and .movie will only be offered to some.

    Using the specific examples of .music and .movie, more than just professional studios offer these services. When Google is willing to allow anybody to register a domain of .book for their newest novel, but requires something else for anybody interested in using .music; it’s causes a little concern. Will Google allow an independent artist to register a .music domain, or do they have to be signed with a major label to gain access?

    The ICANN gTLD registry has the amazing potential to open the Web to more targeted domains that make it easier for people to find what they want. If Google wants to get in the business of offering their domains to the public, that’s fine. They should not, however, allow for abuse on either side. Independent artists and businesses have just as much a right to domains like .movie and .car that the major players in these businesses do. Here’s hoping Google is less than stingy with their domains.

    It’s important to note that Google might not end up with even half of these domains. Many of them were applied for by multiple parties and it’s up to ICANN to decide who gets them. Most of the domains could end up in another party’s hands. It’s still pretty wild to consider that Google could one day be the steward of such powerful new domains like .film and .phd.

  • What Does Google’s gTLD Applications Say About The Company?

    ICANN revealed the list of generic Top-Level Domains today and there was something interesting to be found in it. Aside from Top Level Domain Holdings Limited, Google was a definite contender for most gTLDs applied for. The search giant applied for over 101 new gTLDs and will probably get most of them. Can we gather anything about Google’s aspirations with these applications?

    Here’s the full list of domains that Google has applied for:

    ADS
    AND
    ANDROID
    APP
    ARE
    BABY
    BLOG
    BOO
    BOOK
    BUY
    CAL
    CAR
    CHANNEL
    CHROME
    CLOUD
    CORP
    CPA
    DAD
    DAY
    DCLK
    DDS
    DEV
    DIY
    DOCS
    DOG
    DOT
    DRIVE
    EARTH
    EAT
    ESQ
    EST
    FAMILY
    FILM
    FLY
    FOO
    FREE
    FUN
    FYI
    GAME
    GBIZ
    GLE
    GMAIL
    GMBH
    GOO
    GOOG
    GOOGLE
    GUGE
    HANGOUT
    HERE
    HOME
    HOW
    INC
    ING
    KID
    LIVE
    LLC
    LLP
    LOL
    LOVE
    MAIL
    MAP
    MBA
    MED
    MEME
    MOM
    MOTO
    MOV
    MOVIE
    MUSIC
    NEW
    NEXUS
    PAGE
    PET
    PHD
    PLAY
    PLUS
    PROD
    PROF
    RSVP
    SEARCH
    SHOP
    SHOW
    SITE
    SOY
    SPOT
    SRL
    STORE
    TALK
    TEAM
    TECH
    TOUR
    TUBE
    VIP
    WEB
    WOW
    YOU
    YOUTUBE
    ZIP
    みんな (Everyone)
    グーグル (Google)
    谷歌 (Google)

    The list is a little intimidating to be honest. It really does seem like Google has applied for just about everything that makes sense as well as a lot of things that make little to no sense. The obvious domains like .google and .gmail were guaranteed to show up. What’s up with the weird domains like .family, .mom and .baby? According to Google’s Chief Internet Evangelist, Vint Cerf, the strange domains were acquired because they have “interesting and creative potential.”

    Another oddity is that Google applied for these domains under a company named Charleston Road Registry. Every other big tech company from Microsoft to Apple filed for domains using the company’s name. Was there a reason Google wanted to be different aside from just being different? We’ve reached out to Google and will update this story when he hear back.

    For the time being though, it’s always fun to speculate on things that Google may be planning. It seems that Google may just be buying up domains to be prepared for anything. It’s a far cry from Apple who just applied for .apple and none of their products. Google applied for all of their major products and then some. Could these be future products in the pipeline at Google or are they just setting up domains just in case?

    It’s also interesting to point out that Google was the only one who applied for a lot of these domains. Whereas domains like .music and .movie had multiple applicants, there were some domains that came out of left field like .soy and .dog. The domains just seem too specific and direct to be just random placeholders.

    It will be interesting to see if any of these new domains pan out over the coming months and years once they go live. I personally can’t wait to see what Google does with .soy. I hope they get into the health food business.

  • ICANN Reveals List Of gTLD Applicants With .App Being The Most Popular

    After numerous delays and a last minute call for new applicants, ICANN has finally closed registration for new generic Top-Level Domains. As expected, ICANN has now published the list of applicants and the domains they applied for. There are some interesting applications in here, so let’s take a look.

    Before we get into this, it’s important to understand what the gTLD is all about. The new system from ICANN allows businesses, or regular people if they have the cash, to apply for a new generic Top-Level Domain. This means that people will soon be able to access a site not only with .com or .net, but with a whole host of new domains like .microsoft or .apple, both of which were applied for by their respective companies.

    Aside from Microsoft and Apple, Google obviously applied for .google, but also .goog. Other interesting company choices include .acer, .abc, .aol and .fire. The domain .fire is interesting because it was registered by Amazon presumably for its Kindle Fire device.

    Speaking of Amazon, the company filed for 76 different gTLDs with the most obvious being .amazon. The company also filed for gTLDs covering numerous areas like .buy, .music, .mail and .author.

    Google, filing its gTLDs under Charleston Road Registry, applied for over 101 domain names including .and, .android, .are, .baby, .blog, .book, .music, .fun, .game and .lol.

    Microsoft applied for very little compared to the others with only a little over 10 gTLDs. These include .bing, .docs, .hotmail and .office.

    As for Apple, they only applied for the one domain – .apple. It’s odd as I figured they would want to snag domains for .iphone or .ipad, maybe even .itunes. Nobody else grabbed those domains so at least Apple doesn’t have to worry about some Chinese company claiming to own .ipad.

    Interestingly enough, .app was the most applied for gTLD. Thirteen different companies applied for the domain including Amazon, Google, multiple entities of Dot App, and other smaller companies.

    One of the more interesting details of the new gTLD system is that ICANN is now allowing non-Roman alphabet domain names. This has led to many companies applying for domains in Japanese, Chinese, Arabic and Russian. While the majority of applications were for Roman alphabet domains, there were quite a number of foreign language applications with most being in Chinese.

    Since I can only read Japanese (and not Chinese), let’s take a look at what companies like Amazon or Google are up to. Google applied for two Japanese domain names – みんな and グーグル. The first is “minna” in hiragana which means “everyone.” The second is just romaji for Google. Amazon applied for way more domains in Japanese with all of them being in Romaji. Some of the standouts include アマゾン which is Romaji for Amazon and ファッション, or fashion. Fashion is interesting as Amazon did not apply for the English equivalent.

    You can find the full list of applications at the ICANN Web site. Check it out to catch a glimpse of what may be the future of the Internet. I for one welcome the arrival of the .pizza domain.

  • Google Submits Generic TLDs

    Google Submits Generic TLDs

    The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers’ (ICANN) system for submitting applications for new generic top-level domains (gTLDs) just closed, after over 1900 applications were submitted. Google had submitted its own applications for new TLDs, falling into four categories:

    – Google trademarks, like .google
    – Domains related to our core business, like .docs
    – Domains that will improve user experience, such as .youtube, which can increase the ease with which YouTube channels and genres can be identified
    – Domains we think have interesting and creative potential, such as .lol

    For a bit of backstory, the ICANN application platform, called TLD application system (TAS), was taken down after a glitch was reported which allowed applicants to see each other’s user names and file names. ICANN set April 12th as the last day to submit applications before taking the system offline, after its board of directors approved an increase of the number of gTLDs from the current amount of 22 last June. ICANN, who moderates the address system of the internet, also began accepting non-traditional domain name endings this year, including ‘.sport,’ ‘,food,’ and ‘.bank,’ in hopes to prompt innovation in web commerce. Though, some critics have stated that the new extensions might only confuse consumers and force established online storefronts to spend millions on securing new versions of their brand web addresses.

    Either way, Google seeks to make the introduction of its new generic TLDs a good experience for web users and site owners. Google pledges to:

    – Make security and abuse prevention a high priority
    – Work with all ICANN-accredited registrars
    – Work with brand owners to develop sensible rights protection mechanisms that build upon ICANN’s requirements

    Google’s Vint Cerf, Chief Internet Evangelist, states, “We’re just beginning to explore this potential source of innovation on the web, and we are curious to see how these proposed new TLDs will fare in the existing TLD environment. By opening up more choices for Internet domain names, we hope people will find options for more diverse – and perhaps shorter – signposts in cyberspace.”

  • ICANN Finally Accepting gTLDs Applications Again

    It’s been a long and arduous road for ICANN since last month when their application system for new generic top-level domains went down due to a software glitch. The glitch allowed applicants to see each other’s usernames and file names. It was pretty bad, but things would return to normal at some point in the future.

    The future is now, or at least a future where people can start applying for gTLDs again. It was announced a few weeks ago that the application site would open again on May 22. Today is May 22 so you can start submitting applications once again. The new deadline has been set to May 30.

    The great thing about the new gTLDs system is that you can apply for a TLD that is in non-latin or non-English scripts. While we’ll still have the good old domains like .com or .org, there is a chance that we’ll see some awesome new domains like .もえ.

    ICANN fully expects that most of the applications were taken care of back in April when the application system was first taken down. The eight days between now and the final deadline are mostly for people who may not have finished the entire application process. You can still apply for a new domain though.

    In a statement on the ICANN Web site, they said that a review of the system logs have revealed two instances where a single file was not available to an applicant. That problem has been fixed and the applicant notified.

    You should get back to applying for a new TLD if you haven’t already. Of course, somebody might have already applied for the TLD that you want. PCWorld got their hands on the stats and found that there were over 2,000 applications in the system when it was taken offline. There were also 214 applications where ICANN had not received the application fee yet.

    If you have yet to apply for a TLD or were in the middle of finishing up the application, ICANN suggests that you review the TLD checklist. It’s a comprehensive checklist that goes over every detail including the $185,000 fee it takes to register a new TLD. Anybody want to foot the bill so that we can register .もえ as a top-level domain name? Either way, you can start the application process here.

  • What ICANN Should Do To Rebuild Trust After Security Breach

    During what was supposed to be the exciting early stages of an Internet domain name “revolution,” ICANN is finding itself in a heap of controversy over its new generic top-level domain program. In January, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers began rolling out its historic decision to open up the domain name market.

    The application process was supposed to end on April 12, but was shut down and postponed indefinitely after ICANN detected a technical issue in its TAS software. Furthermore, the glitch allowed some applicants to see the user or file names of other applicants.

    Does ICANN’s security glitch put the entire new gTLD program into question? What do you think?

    There have been many groups that have opposed ICANN’s decision from the start. The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) has been one of the biggest forces in speaking out against the move and, believes these recent developments are proof of the concerns they have raised all along.

    Dan Jaffe, Group Executive Vice President of Government Relations at ANA “It is of concern that the system that they said had to be moving forward rapidly has been closed down more than 18 days,” Dan Jaffe, the Group Executive Vice President of Government Relations at ANA, told WebProNews.

    ICANN has not been very forthcoming with the details about its glitch, which has raised even more concerns over the incident. Jaffe believes the issue is more than just a “glitch” since the system has been shut down for such a long time.

    ANA has reached out to ICANN requesting that it bring in a third party consultant to investigate the issue. It would like ICANN to release a full report explaining how the incident happened, who was impacted, and what ICANN is doing to make sure everyone involved is being treated fairly.

    “It’s a little hard, however, even if they extend the application period, if some groups have better information than all the others,” said Jaffe. “I don’t know they’re going to put everybody on the same footing.”

    Jaffe went on to say that ANA encouraged ICANN to ensure that its system was running effectively before the application process began. He pointed out that a program that was intended to transform the way people use the Internet needed to be handled with more “care and caution” than it was given.
    At this point, ICANN has not issued any type of response to ANA. The association, however, also reached out to the Commerce Department’s Larry Strickling asking that it get involved in addressing the concerns. Jaffe told us that he hopes the department presses ICANN for answers and doesn’t allow it to move forward with its plan until applicants are assured of protection.

    When asked if he thought the new gTLD program should be suspended as a result of these developments, Jaffe told us that he wasn’t sure if such a drastic measure was necessary. He would like to see ICANN take action on the “Do Not Sell” approach, which ANA has proposed, that would protect brands from applying for new top-level domains for defensive purposes, but, again, it has not received a response on it.

    “We think it’s inappropriate, and we are hopeful that ICANN would do something about it,” said Jaffe. “So far, they have not taken any steps to protect brand holders in that area either.”

    ICANN is currently notifying the applicants that were compromised and is expected to re-open the application process once everyone is informed, which is supposed to be by May 8. Here’s the latest statement from ICANN’s COO Akram Atallah on the issue that includes statistics of the breach:

    ICANN is in the process of notifying applicants whether they were affected by the software glitch that caused us to take the TLD Application System, or TAS, offline. As we announced earlier this week, we plan to complete this notification process on or before 8 May.

    As we notify applicants, we want to share some data that gives insight into the scope of the problem and the number of applicants affected.

    At the time we took the system offline, there were 1268 registered users and some 95,000 file attachments in the system. Of these, there were approximately 455 instances where a file name and the associated user name might have been viewed by another applicant. We are continuing to review system logs and packet-level traffic to confirm how many viewings actually did occur.

    Our review has determined that approximately:
    • 105 applicants might have had file names and user names viewed by another applicant.
    • 50 applicants might have viewed file names and user names from one or more other applicants.

    Work continues on enhancing system performance and testing the fix for the glitch.

    We recognize and regret the inconvenience to applicants as they try to plan their schedules and resources in anticipation of TAS reopening. As we have previously announced, we will keep the system open for at least five business days to allow applicants to assure themselves that their applications remain as they intended.

  • Legal Concerns Loom with ICANN’s Upcoming gTLDs

    ICANN’s controversial decision to open up the market for domain name endings is about to get even stickier as the registration process nears its deadline. According to numerous analysts, there will be an outburst of legal issues after the new generic top-level domain (gTLD) applicants are revealed to the public.

    The application window was scheduled to close April 12th, but it was extended after a technical glitch was detected in the TAS system. In an effort to take “the most conservative approach” to protect its applicants and their data, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) shut down its TAS system last Thursday when the issue was found. It was scheduled to reopen today but has since said it needs more time. An update is expected to be announced no later than Friday, April 20th.

    Once the application process is over, as many as 1,000 new domain name endings could be introduced. ICANN’s decision to open the floodgates on gTLDs has gone down in history as one of the most dramatic shakeups the Internet has seen, since it could greatly increase the existing 22 or so extensions that consumers are currently accustomed to.

    Do you see ICANN’s move as a positive or a negative for businesses? We’d love to know.

    Joe Luthy, Global Marketing Director at Melbourne IT Joe Luthy, the Global Marketing Director for Melbourne IT, told WebProNews that the new gTLDs would cover many different industries. He assisted more than 150 applicants through the registration process and said the diversity of the applications was unexpected.

    “It’s gonna be surprising, we believe, whenever the full list is revealed in May,” he pointed out.

    Although ICANN’s “Reveal Day” isn’t scheduled until the end of this month, Luthy said companies should already begin preparing for the news. He recommends that businesses start identifying their own brands and trademarks to see not only what rights they have, but also what they want to have in the future.

    “Right now, companies – whether they’ve applied or not applied – really need to start thinking about what’s important to them going forward,” he said.

    One issue that could pose a problem for a company is if an applicant has filed a name 
“confusingly similar” to its own. Another potential problem could be in the applicant’s intent of use.

    If a problem does arise, ICANN has allowed for a 60-day window, in which concerned parties can comment or object to an application. With infringement issues, a company has 7 months to file a formal objection to stop the application from going forward until the concerns are addressed or the application is withdrawn.

    “There’s going to be probably a lot of contention because there’s a number of companies out there applying for the same generic,” said Luthy.

    As he explained to us, several companies are fighting over the .eco domain ending and are looking at legal action even before the applicants have been released. Other similar issues are expected since endings such as .ritz could be used in a variety of ways.

    These concerns, and others, have brought ICANN’s move a lot of criticism, especially from the advertising community. In the below interview, Dan Jaffe, the Executive Vice President of Government Relations for the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), told WPN that ICANN’s move was both “reckless” and “premature.”

    “Unfortunately in the existing system, there are serious problems of cyber squatting, typo squatting, phishing, the placement of malware, [and] the inability to find out who, in fact, really owns Internet addresses,” he said. “We’re afraid unless these types of problems are resolved that suddenly opening the top-level domains to as many as 1,000 new top-level domains, which is a thousand percent increase over the existing systems, it would be very, very dangerous both to businesses and consumers. ”

    While Luthy believes legal conflicts will ensue after ICANN’s “Reveal Day,” he said most of them would come from the generic side since it is very competitive. Most brand owners, on the other hand, are simply trying to promote internal brands and services.

    ICANN has said this move would offer more opportunities to both consumers and brands. While time will tell whether or not this will, in fact, happen, Luthy is confident in ICANN’s decision.

    “Every innovation we’ve seen on the Internet has opened up a lot of opportunities [and] created a lot of new businesses,” he said. “I think we’re gonna see the same thing with the new TLDs.”

    The new gTLDs are expected to begin appearing late next year. ICANN has also said it will have future application windows, although it has not given any specific dates for them.

  • ICANN Delays Deadline For gTLD Applications

    Were you one of many potential domain owners trying to hurry the submission of your gTLD application to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers by today’s deadline? Thanks to reports of “unusual behavior with the operation of the system” at ICANN, you aspiring web domain owners have been granted one more week to finalize your applications, according to the organization.

    In a statement that was released today, ICANN recognized that a technical issue may have been interfering with the TLD Application System and therefore, in order to protect all applicants, the deadline to complete the application has been extended until 23:59 UTC on Friday, April 20, 2012. The statement continued, “ICANN is taking the most conservative approach possible to protect all applicants and allow adequate time to resolve the issue. Therefore, TAS will be shut down until Tuesday at 23:59 UTC – unless otherwise notified before that time.”

    Note, for you readers in the United States, 23:59 UTC means 19:59 EST, or 7:59PM.

    According to an ICANN spokesperson who spoke with Domain Incite, the technical issue was not the result of a cyberattack. “No application data has been lost from those who have already submitted the applications, so it should not pose problems for existing applicants,” ICANN said.

    ICANN has not yet commented on whether this deadline push-back will affect the date for when the organization will release a full list of gTLD applicants. The scheduled date for the list’s release is slated for the end of this month, April 30.

    As of March 25, ICANN said that there had been 839 registered users.

    If homework due dates ever taught me anything, just because you’ve gotten a deadline reprieve doesn’t mean you should wait until the absolute last second to get those applications finished. But tonight, at least, sleep a little easier.

    [Via The Telegraph.]

  • ANA on ICANN’s Expansion of Top-Level Domains: “Reckless and Premature”

    On January 12, ICANN began carrying out its controversial new plan. As WebProNews previously reported, the organization made the historical decision last year to expand the number of generic top-level domain (gTLD) names to an unlimited number. What this means is that the 22 domain name endings, including .com, .org, and others that currently exist, could turn into .brand going forward.

    Do you support ICANN’s plan to expand domain names to an unlimited number? Let us know your thoughts.

    The decision was reached with much opposition, especially from the advertising and marketing community. The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) has been the biggest force in speaking out against ICANN’s plan. It, along with 161 other organizations, formed the Coalition for Responsible Internet Domain Oversight (CRIDO) in order to raise awareness of their concerns.

    These organizations believe that the new gTLDs could be harmful to both brands and consumers. In the interview below, Doug Wood, the General Counsel for the ANA, told us ICANN’s plan was an unnecessary move.

    “Consumers have no problem finding what they’re looking for on the Internet through search engine technology,” he said. “This is more of a solution looking for a problem that doesn’t exist, and the costs that will be incurred by brands and then, ultimately, pushed on to consumers… is going to be far in excess of any justifiable cause.”

    Despite the criticism, ICANN began carrying out its plan earlier this month, a move that Dan Jaffe, the Executive Vice President of Government Relations for ANA, calls both “reckless” and “premature.”

    Dan Jaffe, Executive Vice President of Government Relations at ANAAs he explained to us, there are problems such as cyber squatting and phishing that exist in the current system. That said, he thinks that those issues need to be addressed before the floodgates are opened for new top-level domains.

    “Unfortunately in the existing system, there are serious problems of cyber squatting, typo squatting, phishing, the placement of malware, [and] the inability to find out who, in fact, really owns Internet addresses,” he said. “We’re afraid unless these types of problems are resolved that suddenly opening the top-level domains to as many as 1,000 new top-level domains, which is a thousand percent increase over the existing systems, it would be very, very dangerous both to businesses and consumers. ”

    ANA and CRIDO have reached out to ICANN on several occasions in an effort to get the decision reversed. The FTC and various officials in the U.S. government have also expressed their concerns, but Jaffe told us that ICANN has not responded.

    One of the big concerns that these groups have is that businesses will feel pressured to spend the $185,000 or more to keep a competitor or worse from buying their domain name. ICANN, however, says that it has protections in place such as its “Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy” that protect businesses from taking defensive measures.

    “They have put in several protections, but they have never run a pilot project to see if those various protections really work in the real world,” said Jaffe.

    “ICANN is running some of the fundamental areas of the Internet and, therefore, we want to make sure they run them properly or ICANN’s own future will seriously be undermined,” he added.

    Last week, ICANN announced that it has already approved 25 successful registrants for new domains. Jaffe told us that the full impact of the move would not be felt until April when ICANN stops accepting applications and reveals the new registrants.

    In the meantime, he is hoping that the U.S. Department of Commerce uses its Affirmation of Commitments authority and its oversight of the IANA contracts to get ICANN’s attention.

    “We think this is absolutely a top issue for the business community across the whole of the world,” he said. “[It] needs to be done appropriately, or it will severely undermine the trust that has begun to be built up to make the Internet one of the largest marketplaces in history, the largest marketplace in history.”