WebProNews

Tag: GOP

  • Mitt Romney: Will He Become The Republican Nominee? RNC Chairman Says It’s Possible

    Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican Presidential nominee reiterated that he is not running for president amid speculation that he could be the Republican nominee in the event of a contested Republican National Convention in July. However, Romney said he would gladly accept it if given the chance.

    “I don’t think anyone in our party should say, ‘Oh no, even if the people of the party wanted me to be president, I would say no to it.’ No one is going to say that,” Romney told NBC’s Meet the Press.

    Although Mitt Romney insisted on numerous occasions that he is not joining the race, it is possible that someone who is not running for president could be nominated, according to Steffen Schmidt, a political science professor at Iowa State University.

    A contested convention only happens when the candidates fail to gather the required number of delegates to secure the nomination. “If nobody has enough delegates, then the negotiation begins,” Schmidt explained. “For example, Donald Trump would go to Carson delegates or Rubio delegates and say back me, support me, I’m the most like what you want.”

    If none of the delegates is able to collect a majority, that is when someone like Romney, who is not running, could be considered for a nomination. Schmidt added that the party could also tweak some rules to allow Romney to be placed in as the candidate.

    Mitt Romney remains positive that such a “brokered” or “contested” convention would never happen. However, RNC Chair Reince Preibus maintains that there is a tiny possibility that such scenario would occur.

    Mitt Romney said he is planning to endorse any of Donald Trump’s three rivals but insisted that he is not running. “I can tell you this: I’m not a candidate. I’m not going to be a candidate. I am going to be endorsing one of the people who is running for president.”

  • ‘House Of Cards’ Promotes Season 4 Premiere Through Fake Campaign Ad

    Netflix picked the perfect spot to announce the return of its hit political drama series, House of Cards.

    Viewers who were tuned in to the final Republican Presidential Debate late last Tuesday were treated to what seemed like an ordinary campaign advertisement, until the smug face of Frank Underwood appeared in the last frame.

    The ad features several political campaign clichés including pictures of hard work and progress accompanied by the usual lines found in conventional political rhetoric.

    “It’s a new day in America,” says the narrator, enumerating promises that are all-too-familiar to the American voter during election season. He goes on to say that these “promises” will finally be fulfilled by Underwood, who is described as “a man who refuses to settle, putting people before politics.” Kevin Spacey, who brilliantly plays the conniving and mercurial Underwood in House of Cards, is seen feign-signing an important document, after which he faces the camera and says, “America, I’m only getting started.”

    Netflix Uses the GOP Debate to Promote New Season of House of Cards

    It is also revealed at the very end of the ad that season 4 of House of Cards will premiere on March 4th of next year. The fake URL FU2016.com is also a real website that “entices” visitors to join the movement of “Inequality, Dishonesty, and Entitlement.” It also enables visitors to create their own custom “FU” advocacy poster and save it as an image in one’s computer.

    In the fourth season of House of Cards, viewers can expect to see how Frank Underwood handles his job as re-elected president of the United States without his wife, Claire – played by Robin Wright – who decides to leave him ithe season 3 finale.

    House of Cards is based on a novel by British politician and author Michael Dobbs and adapted from a BBC mini-series of the same name. Its first season premiered in February 2013 and has received several accolades from various award-giving bodies including the Emmys, Webbys, Critics’ Choice, and People’s Choice to name a few.

  • Sarah Palin’s Incompetence To Blame For GOP’s Dysfunctional Activity, Says Bill Daley

    The current candidacy of billionaire celebrity Donald Trump has caused people – especially Democrats – to question the stability and “sanity” of the GOP. The latest individual to chime in is former Chief of Staff to President Obama, Bill Daley.

    Daley wrote an article in the Opinions section of The Washington Post website, in which he stated that the chaos that is currently surrounding the GOP presidential primary was triggered by the decision of Senator John McCain to have Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate in the 2008 presidential elections.

    In the article, Daley narrowed down the culprit to Palin’s “blatant lack of competence and preparedness,” which he says “needs no belaboring.” He further explains that Palin’s campaign strategy, which involved reason-deprived and flashy “never compromise” declarations gave way to Trump’s similarly-veined platform – to “make America great again.”

    AlterNet’s Janet Allon points out that Palin is in rather “good” company; she isn’t the only Republican figure whose mental and intellectual abilities have been questioned.

    In 2010, former Delaware senatorial candidate Christine O’Donnell appeared in advertisements declaring that she is “not a witch” after a video of herself admitting to “dabbling in witchcraft” was shown on Real Time with Bill Maher.

    Former Missouri Representative Todd Akin got embroiled in a huge controversy in 2012 when he coined the term “legitimate rape” in an interview about abortion. Palin got wind of Daley’s comments and took to social media to express her derision. “The Left’s failed agenda is my fault? Well maybe that’s a fine birthday gift for Mom today! Happy birthday, Mom!” she posted on her Facebook and Twitter pages as a caption to the Daley article.

    Former Georgia congressman John Linder came out with an article of his own, reacting to Daley’s commentary, and in effect, defending Palin and the Republican Party.

    His article, which was published Wednesday on The Blaze, enumerated the numerous accomplishments of the Republican Party in an effort to counter Daley’s accusations of “incompetence”.

    Linder went on to criticize President Obama’s administration and made an exhaustive list of its “failures.” He ends his retaliation by suggesting that Daley should know better than to attack Palin and the Republicans.

  • Donald Trump Is Certainly Winning the Google Search Battle

    Donald Trump Is Certainly Winning the Google Search Battle

    Google Trends has produced an interactive county-by-county map of the most-searched Republican Presidential candidates – and it’s monochromatic.

    That dark red represents Donald Trump, who is pretty much dominating Google searches across the country – unless you head to Wisconsin, where Scott Walker receives the bulk of the attention.

    After Walker, Jeb Bush wins a handful of scattered counties.

    Check out Google’s map:

    If you look at the second-most searched candidate, there’s a lot more Bush.

    Donald Trump is a lot of things. Ignored is not one of them – at least at this stage in the competition. Twitter recently provided data on overall mentions on its platform over the past month, and it’s not even close. Trump received 2.7 million mentions, and his closest competitor was Scott Walker with 354,000 total mentions in the time period.

    Real Clear Politics’ aggregate polling data has trump up 10.4 points over Jeb Bush.

  • Donald Trump Praised by Comedian Jackie Mason for Having a Big Mouth

    Donald Trump got high praise from comedian Jackie Mason recently when the veteran comic appeared on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.”

    Trump has gotten a mix of responses lately for his outspoken views on immigration. He lost some business partners and gained the ire of what appears to be the entire country of Mexico when he announced his candidacy.

    “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Trump said when he announced his run for president. “They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

    Many have flocked to support Trump, saying that he is simply saying out loud what needs to be said.

    “So this guy just saved thousands of lives by the fact that he has such a big mouth and tells the truth,” Jackie Mason said of Trump.

    Donald Trump is not just catching flak from liberals over his statements, but also from members of the party he hopes will nominate him to run for president. He has particularly gone head to head with Jeb Buch and Marco Rubio over his statements about Mexican immigrants.

    Jackie Mason says establishment Republicans “can’t tolerate” Trump’s outspoken attitude “and they are making him into the clown.”

    “They are the clowns!” Mason shot back.

    Mason further argued that the GOP “stinks because all of the Republicans have accomplished nothing, and they talk about all of these issues and do nothing about it for a whole lifetime.”

    Mason says Donald Trump made everyone uncomfortable, but it had to be done.

    “And as soon as he dramatized the issue (of illegal immigration), they got panicky and the only guy that made sense disturbed them and it panicked them. Because it proves that they are doing nothing, and he’s accomplishing something by telling the truth.”

    “And he’s making a fool out of them by being honest. And an honest person is intolerable amongst thieves.”

    Some are of the opinion that Trump may be good for the party because he says out loud the things that other think silently. But that does not mean he can win the primary, much less an election. When asked about Trump’s actual chances of being elected, Mason was positive.

    “There’s no question about it that not only does he stand a chance, but I see it as very strong possibility that he is going to bury all of them, and he is going to come out the big winner.”

    Mason then said what many are saying about Trump’s run and outspokenness.

    “The silent majority is back, and we’re going to take our country back.”

  • Eva Longoria Compares Donald Trump Comments to Hitler

    If Eva Longoria is right, Donald Trump may have what it takes to be the leader of a country. The question is: which country?

    In a single speech, Trump polarized a passionate base, marginalized an entire race, angered a foreign nation, and launched himself to the top of his political party’s polls.

    Speaking on the topic of illegal immigration from Mexico, Trump drew his sand line clearly.

    “When Mexico sends its people they aren’t sending their best,” Trump said when he announced his candidacy. “They are bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they are rapists and some are good people but I speak to border guards and they tell us what we’re getting.”

    Eva Longoria was interviewed at a National Association of Latino Independent Producers luncheon last week. She was asked about her response to Trump’s comments.

    “Everybody’s been coming to me for a comment on it,” Longoria said at first, “and I’ve refused to comment on it. I feel like I don’t want to bring any more attention to the words because they’re nothing that I agree with, obviously.”

    Longoria reasoned that open opposition to Trump’s remarks would just make things worse.

    “What I think he doesn’t understand, and what people don’t understand, is words create emotional poison,” Longoria said. That’s what they do. They create emotional poison.”

    She then invoked the specter of the man who did this with greatest effectiveness.

    “Hitler moved a nation with words, just words.”

    So Longoria veered away from personally responding to the particulars of what Trump said.

    “It struck a chord within our community that touched our emotions so deep that I don’t want to contribute to that poison being spread. Because if I contribute, it’s just going to bring more attention to the original comments. I’m like, ‘You know what? I am not going to contribute to your emotional poison that you are spreading.’”

    Nonetheless, she does admit that Trump should have known that he would catch hell for his comments.

    “But, that being said, I think there’s a lot of movement happening already. You have to expect this backlash if you say something like that. You have to expect a backlash.”

    Indeed, Donald Trump is giving the GOP cause for concern, leading to other GOP leaders distancing themselves from his remarks.

    Donald Trump’s remarks have caused such a furor in Mexico that piñatas of his likeness are becoming popular, llowing Mexicans to bash away at The Donald and his combover.

    Another observant journalist sought to remind Donald Trump that his own signature line of men’s suits are made in Mexico.

  • GOP Wishing Donald Trump Would Go Away?

    The GOP is having a hard enough time as it is. The last thing they need is an opportunistic also-ran like Donald Trump distracting voters.

    Donald Trump threw down the gauntlet of red meat when he announced his candidacy by offending all of Mexico and all the Mexican immigrants that the GOP is already so desperate to win over to their side of the aisle.

    “When Mexico sends its people they aren’t sending their best,” Trump said when he announced his candidacy. “They are bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they are rapists and some are good people but I speak to border guards and they tell us what we’re getting.”

    These comments, and others that double down on them, may get Donald Trump loads of press, but they have lost him his deals with NBC and other media outlets for his Miss USA and Miss Universe business

    Now the GOP itself is heaving sighs of frustration over Trump’s statements.

    “Donald Trump’s comments are hurtful for the cause of Republicans who want to reach out not just to Latinos but across many different ethnic barriers,” said Ben Domenech, who specializes in GOP strategy for landing Hispanic voters. “The problem with those comments is made worse by the fact that people will continue to confuse Trump with a Republican, which he is not, as opposed to thinking of him as an entertainer, which he is.”

    Rick Perry said, “I don’t think Donald Trump’s remarks reflect the Republican Party.”

    Rather than back off his remarks, Trump insists, “If you look at the statistics of people coming, you look at the statistics on rape, on crime, on everything coming in illegally into this country it’s mind-boggling!” Trump told CNN’s Don Lemon in an interview Wednesday. “Somebody’s doing the raping! I mean somebody’s doing it! Who’s doing the raping?”

  • Miss USA Picked Back Up for TV; Trump Sues for $500 Million

    The Miss USA enterprise, run by tycoon and equal opportunity offender Donald Trump, has finally found a channel to land on. After the NBC network unceremoniously severed ties with Donal Trump following his statements that Mexicans were “rapists,” the Miss USA ogle-fest has now landed on Reelz. Yep, Reelz.

    What’s worse, network insiders claim that they got the event for a song because no one else wanted to touch it.

    Reelz Channel paid “no more than $100,000” to license Donald Trump’s Miss USA pageant, according to the insider. And the CEO of the network is already distancing himself from Trump.

    Reelz CEO Stan E. Hubbard said his network “does not endorse Trump’s comments regarding Mexicans. I am not a supporter of Donald Trump for president.”

    The Miss USA catastrophe is just one of many that The Donald has gotten himself into by virtue of the announcement of his running for President. Not, his actual running, mind you, but simply the announcement.

    Trump said at his campaign announcement that Mexicans crossing U.S. borders are “bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists, and some, I assume, are good people.”

    Univision and Televisa dropped Trump and Miss USA like a hot combover. NBC responded to Trump’s statements by issuing one of their own.

    “Donald Trump’s opinions do not represent those of NBC, and we do not agree with his positions on a number of issues, including his recent comments on immigration. At NBC, respect and dignity for all people are cornerstones of our values. Due to the recent derogatory statements by Donald Trump regarding immigrants, NBCUniversal is ending its business relationship with Mr. Trump.”

    And that’s how Donald Trump ran for President and lost his biggest ally in his Miss USA endeavors. Trump claims he is not taking this setback lying down. Speaking on The O’Reilly Factor, Trump said of his former Miss USA partners:

    “I just sued Univision for 500 million dollars. It was just filed. The papers were just filed so that will be interesting. Because Univision, I have a signed contract for five years on the pageants they have no right to terminate. They didn’t even send me a letter, they terminated with a PR statement. They called me also – one of the top people at Univision so apologetic, ‘Donald. we shouldn’t be doing this, I know that. We’ll pay you whatever money you need or whatever money you want.’ They have a five-year contract without termination and they terminated with a PR statement so we just sued them for $500 million.”

  • Ben Carson Isn’t Yet Running, May Not Win, But Can’t Lose

    Gatewood Galbraith was a perennial candidate in Kentucky for years. The Lexington-based attorney is something of a folk hero in the state, especially now that he has died. Stickers and spray-painted images of Gatewood made with stencils appear on street signs, overpasses, and other handy displays around Lexington.

    Gatewood — for he is known by his first name throughout the state — was an open marijuana smoker and advocate who used his regular runs at the Governor’s mansion as platforms to bring the issue of pot and hemp into the public debate arena. He spoke truth to power and won the hearts of liberal Kentuckians. He never won an election. But he never lost either.

    In his book The Last Free Man in America, Gatewood explained that a mentor had once told him that, “An attorney who runs for public office … never loses.”

    Gatewood went on to explain that running for office, even if one loses the election, boosts the public profile of the person running. It puts them in the homes of people with money. It allows them to give speeches, travel, meet influencers and leaders of business.

    Even if you lose, you win.

    Ben Carson has not officially declared that he is running for President of the United States in 2016. His business manager Armstrong Williams bought airtime for what is being called a documentary and an infomercial. It is titled “A Breath of Fresh Air: A New Prescription for America.” It aims to “introduce” Ben Carson to America.

    It is also being called the first campaign ad of the 2016 presidential election season.

    Think back a moment to the 2012 election cycle. In the end, it came down to the RNC-anointed Mitt Romney and incumbent Barack Obama. But during the Republican primary season before the general run, one candidate after another took a turn leading polls.

    Michele Bachmann came out of the gate strong from the Iowa Caucus, but fizzled fast.

    Jon Huntsman went down early because he was not considered “conservative enough”.

    Buddy Roehmer appealed to young people, especially during the #occupy events of those months, but he was also ignored by party leaders.

    Rick Santorum ran hard to eliminate the stain on his reputation and name.

    Newt Gingrich won the South Carolina primary, which had traditionally meant he would go all the way to the general. But he did not. In fact, he curiously failed to register in time for primaries in other states.

    Then there was Herman Cain. Some said he was a serious threat to Democrats because he was African-American. He could steal away the black vote.

    But Cain fizzled fast when, like Sarah Palin before him, he could not answer questions about issues of national importance. He was accused of sexual misconduct. He never made it to face Obama.

    Ron Paul’s approach seemed to be much like Gatewood in Kentucky: run frequently as a means of highlighting what is wrong, not necessarily to win. Party desperation floated him a long distance, but in the end he too came up short against Romney.

    Week after week, one candidate then another took the spotlight, touted as The One. The One who could beat Obama. The One we’ve been waiting for. The One who would keep the GOP from having to nominate a Mormon who had implemented Obamacare’s predecessor in his own state.

    Romney got 52% of the GOP primary vote. The rest was split between Paul, Santorum, and Gingrich. Cain, Bachmann, et al, were also-rans.

    But did they lose?

    Since Herman Cain’s “loss” he now has a conservative radio show that airs in the same markets as Limbaugh and Hannity. He has an online “TV channel,” much like Sarah Palin’s. And he has over a million likes on his Facebook page.

    And, wouldn’t you know it, Herman Cain is ready to run again.

    Rick Santorum has also seen progress since his loss. He published two books. He got an online column with a conservative site for a while.

    Santorum also told Meet the Press, “I’m open to looking into a presidential race in 2016.” And he told RealClearPolitics, “I’m doing everything right now as if I’m running,” he said. “So we’re moving forward and trying to line up supporters — both grassroots and donors.”

    Newt Gingrich has published books for years, even conducting book signings along the campaign trail, boosting sales and making his appearances pay. Before the primary, Gingrich owned shares in a booking agency owned by his daughter that handled speaking engagements for both himself and fellow candidate Rick Santorum.

    Elections are good for business. Deep-pocketed idealists hand over millions to run promotional ads for businessmen who continue to reap the benefits long after they “lose.”

    Ben Carson is jumping into that realm early. Is he concerned about wearing out his welcome as a candidate? Did he give any thought to holding his announcement, a la Hillary Clinton, so as to stay fresh with voters ahead of the election season?

    Ben Carson already has six books in English, two in Spanish, and a DVD to sell. Why wait?

  • Republicans Made Their Own Retro Platformer Starring an Elephant Named Giopi

    The National Republican Senatorial Committee, the group whose only purpose is getting Republicans elected to the US Senate, has turned to nostalgic gaming to help with its cause.

    The NRSC has built its own retro platformer called Gioipi: 2014 Mission Majority. Combining funky chiptune jams and an unbelievably spry pachyderm with strong GOP messaging, Giopi is available to play right now.

    The game stars Giopi (Ghi-ah-pee? Jai-op-pie?), a patriotically-attired elephant. His goal is to acquire golden keys while avoiding various Democratic foes along the way.

    In level one, Giopi must avoid the dreaded “Taxers.”

    In level two, you encounter “Mudslingers,” described as Democrats who hurl false and empty rhetoric.

    Obama soundbites like “If you like your doctor you will be able to keep your doctor” and “You didn’t build that” play when you vanquish an enemy.

    When you get to level three, you’re told that you’ve collected enough keys to unlock a “large group of volunteers who will knock on doors and make phone calls.”

    “We are here to win back the majority, and to get our nation back on track after a tough few years under the Obama administration. Keep your eyes on the goal!” says Giopi.

    Level four is where shit gets real. Not only are you battling taxers and mudslingers, but you’re also dodging other members of the Obama administration. Your task in the final level is to activate six “switches,” which represent states electing a Republican Senator.

    I’d like to tell you what happens when you beat the game, but I gave up trying to get the game to work past level three after about ten minutes. In lieu of knowing what actually happens, I’ll just assume that Ted Cruz rides down the side of a mountain in a blaze of blinding white light and sends Harry Reid plunging into the fiery depths of Mount Doom.

    The game’s a bit glitchy all around. Though you can supposedly log in via Facebook or Google+, I could only get the game to load via email sign-in after about three tries. And of course, the aforementioned black screen of death prevented be from fulfilling my true destiny.

    Final verdict: the required 60/100. Had a blast. Would play again, if it would let me.

    Image via NRSC, YouTube screenshot

  • Mitt Romney Crushes New Hampshire Poll; 2016 Bid?

    If someone was to grab you on the street and ask you who you thought the leading candidate for the 2016 Republican nomination for President would be, a plethora of names could tumble from your mouth – Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, etc. etc. The last name many would expect to hear on that list would be two-time failure Mitt Romney. However, in a recent poll released by the University of New Hampshire, Romney would win the presidential nomination by a landslide if the vote was held today.

    The poll, conducted by WMUR, showed that despite 20 percent of the people in New Hampshire not even knowing which party they would vote for in the 2016 election, 39 percent of them would vote for Mitt Romney. Romney’s next closest challengers, Rand Paul and Chris Christie, finished at seven percent, while Jeb Bush pulled in six percent of the vote.

    The poll comes on the heels of another poll from Quinnipiac University in which 45 percent of voters believed that the United States would be better off today if Romney would have been elected in 2012 instead of Barack Obama.

    There is one bit of information most sources are leaving out of the New Hampshire poll, however. The study was conducted by calling 669 New Hampshire adults and asking them who they supported. 669! A number that barely scratches the surface of eligible voters in the state, and a number that is not near big enough to extrapolate national trends.

    Unfortunately, though, there is more than one source which suggests Romney would have a successful 2016 bid if he chose to do so. Much like the New Hampshire and Quinnipiac polls, a website in the state of Alabama conducted a poll which resulted in Romney accruing 63.67 percent of the vote when people were asked, “Who should be the presidential nominee for the Republican Party in 2016?”

    There is also a petition online right now with the purpose of “drafting” Romney to become the next Republican presidential nominee. Surprisingly, the poll has 54,382 supporters at the current moment.

    While many would not consider Romney a front-runner for the nomination by any means, the proof is in the pudding. And who knows? Perhaps the third time’s the charm for good ol’ Mittens. Only time will tell.

    Image via YouTube

  • Ann Coulter Calls Dave Brat Win a “Massive Wakeup Call” to GOP

    Ann Coulter thinks Dave Brat’s recent victory over Republican incumbent Eric Cantor in last Tuesday’s primary election is a good thing for the Republican party.

    The conservative political commentator joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Live to discuss the shocking election results.

    “Amnesty loses big,” Coulter told Kelly. “The idea that this will hurt the Republicans in 2016 is insane.”

    Coulter believes Cantor lost the primary due to one key issue: his support of amnesty for 11 million illegal aliens.

    Cantor, who has served as House Majority Leader since 2011, spent significantly more on his campaign than Tea Party-backed Brat ($5 million vs. less than $150,000.)

    But Brat, an economist and professor at Randolph-Macon College, played up Cantor’s support of amnesty and Coulter believes that was the key to Brat’s impressive victory.

    “Whenever the voters know an election is about immigration, they will always vote against more immigration – especially amnesty,” Coulter wrote on her website.

    She insists Brat’s win is a defeat for amnesty versus a victory for the Tea Party.

    In general, Coulter doesn’t support the Tea Party: “… the big, national tea party groups are mostly shysters and con-men raising money for their own self-aggrandizement.”

    But in mid-April she threw her support behind Brat:

    “If you don’t think the Republican Party should speak exclusively for Wall Street, Silicon Valley and the Chamber of Commerce, then you have to support … Dave Brat … challenging the amnesty-addled Eric Cantor in Virginia’s 7th Congressional District.”

    In the short term, Coulter told Kelly, she hopes Brat’s victory over Cantor will “shut down any more happy talk about amnesty this year.”

    In the long term, she hopes the GOP will see it as a wakeup call. In fact, she’d like them to declare a moratorium on immigration.

    “I like Israel’s immigration policy: instant, unapologetic, unsentimental deportation of illegal aliens.”

    Image via YouTube

  • Rick Perry Likens Homosexuality to Alcoholism

    In his 2012 presidential bid, Texas governor Rick Perry was known for his verbal gaffes, perhaps the most famous of which coming during a debate in which Perry forgot which part of the federal government he wished to abolish.

    Many have not considered Perry to be a viable candidate in the 2016 elections, yet his actions imply otherwise, making visits to early voting states such as Iowa and South Carolina. And while Perry may have learned many things during his first foray into the race for president, speaking skills were apparently not on the list.

    During a visit to the Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco on Wednesday night, Perry sought to push less-restricted economic practices onto California, imploring the state to follow the example set by Texas: “I’m not here to dis California. I’m here to lay out what we’ve done in [Texas], economically, and let you decide which one of those economic policies best suits you.”

    Despite his assurances, however, Perry did dis California, albeit most likely not on purpose.

    During the question and answer session with the audience, Perry fielded a question about whether or not he thought that reparative therapy for homosexuals, a practice now deemed acceptable and appropriate by the state of Texas, really worked: “I don’t know. I’m not a psychiatrist, I’m not a doctor,” responded Perry.

    Commonwealth Club interviewer Greg Dalton then asked the logical follow up question: Is it [homosexuality] a disorder?

    Perry’s answer resulted in several, audible gasps:

    Whether or not you feel compelled to follow a particular lifestyle or not, you have the ability to decide not to do that. I may have the genetic coding that I’m inclined to be an alcoholic, but I have the desire not to do that, and I look at the homosexual issue the same way.

    In a state which has banned reparative therapy from licensed professionals to minors, Perry’s answer was perhaps the most wrong answer he could have given.

    In response to Perry’s inane comment Wednesday night, the Human Rights Campaign released a simple, yet effective, reply:

    Although he may not have the ‘genetic coding’ to think before he speaks, Rick Perry, M.D. should have a real conversation with actual doctors before voicing his expertise on these issues. Every major mental health and medical organization in the country has condemned practices aimed at changing a person’s sexual orientation.

    Unfortunately for Perry, this is not the first time he has expressed such views. In his 2008 book, On My Honor, Perry likened homosexuality to alcoholism once again, saying, “Even if an alcoholic is powerless over alcohol once it enters his body, he still makes a choice to drink. And, even if someone is attracted to a person of the same sex, he or she still makes a choice to engage in sexual activity with someone of the same gender.”

    If there’s one upside for the Perry campaign, it’s this – If Perry decides to run for President in 2016, he will not have to worry about spending money to campaign in California… or New York… or Massachusetts… or Washington… (You get the picture.)

    Image via YouTube

  • Lindsey Graham Wins South Carolina Primary

    In shocking news last night, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor lost in the Virginia primary to dark-horse Tea Party candidate and political newcomer, David Brat. This defeat for the Republicans follows disappointing news from the Mississippi primaries last week, in which incumbent Thad Cochran was forced into a runoff with challenger Chris McDaniel.

    Fortunately for the Republicans, they were able to rebound last night following a victory by veteran South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham.

    Much like Cantor and Cochran, Graham has faced much resistance and opposition from his home state for not being “conservative” enough. The Tea Party has been able to mount quite a vocal challenge based around Graham’s bipartisan approach to politics, singling out his soft stance on illegal immigration, his support of climate change legislation, and his approval of President Obama’s two Supreme Court nominations as reasons why Graham should be replaced in the Senate.

    Unfortunately for the anti-Graham populace of South Carolina, there were perhaps too many opponents running against 12-year incumbent.

    With almost all precincts reporting on Tuesday night, Graham held 57 percent of the popular vote, more than enough to avoid a runoff. His next closest opponent, State Senator Lee Bright, accumulated only 15 percent of the vote. None of Graham’s other 4 challengers broke double digits.

    Graham was able to fend off Tea Party opposition through multiple means, perhaps the most important being spending. Following his 2008 election, Graham recognized the potential future threat the Tea Party posed. Planning ahead, Graham began a hard campaign to raise as much money as possible. Over the span of six years, Graham was able to raise $12 million for his campaign – none of Graham’s challengers surpassed the $1 million mark.

    This huge surplus in funds allowed Graham to advertise himself to every voter in South Carolina through a variety of mediums: “He’s on every television station, he’s on every radio station and he’s just done his homework. He has effectively muted his opponents, because none of them can match him, dollar for dollar,” stated David Woodard, the Thurmond Professor of Political Science at Clemson.

    Graham was also able to quiet his opponents criticizing him for not being conservative enough by being consistent with his views. Many believe Cantor’s loss was due to his soft, wavering stance on immigration. While Senator Graham shares the same views on immigration as Cantor, he was able to overcome his opposition by sticking to his guns on other conservative issues, such as the repeal of Obamacare, pro-business legislation, and especially his warhawk foreign policy positions.

    “The reason I’m going to win the primary, overwhelmingly I hope, is I’m a Ronald Reagan Republican,” Graham stated during the South Carolina GOP debates last week.

    If the Republican party wants to avoid more crushing losses in the near future, perhaps they should look towards how Senator Graham ran his campaign. Or, taking another lesson from Graham, consult the Ronald Reagan playbook.

    Image via YouTube

  • Joni Ernst Wins GOP Primary in Iowa for US Senate

    In order to achieve a majority in the United States Senate after the next election cycle, the Republican Party must win six additional seats. Fortunately for conservatives, fate seemed to be smiling on the GOP Tuesday as Republican candidate Joni Ernst dominated her competition in the Iowa state primary in order to become the Republican nominee in the highly-anticipated Senatorial race this fall.

    Ernst’s victory makes her the first female to ever be nominated for the Republican Senate from Iowa. The 43-year-old state Senator and military commander faced stiff competition in her primary race from multiple sources: former energy executive and multi-millionaire Mark Jacobs, Rick Perry-backed attorney Matt Whitaker, radio host and Santorum-supported Sam Clovis, and car-salesman Scott Schaben.

    While most political pundits expected Jacobs to present the greatest challenge to Ernst (mainly due to his record-setting self-financed campaign expenditures of over $1.65 million), but it was Clovis who finished second to Ernst with 18 percent of the vote. Ernst more than doubled her competition, finishing with 56.2 percent of the votes.

    Ernst was able to run such a successful campaign mainly through the use of contextually-strategic television ads. Her first ad was entitled “Squeal” and featured Ernst discussing the hog castration skills she obtained growing up on an Iowa farm. In the video, Ernst states that she will use her castration skills in Washington to help “cut the pork.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Y24MFOfFU

    The video became so popular that it was even featured on late-night talk shows across the country, bringing in much needed outside support for Ernst’s campaign and leading to another viral ad.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3mG9fNOZp4

    Perhaps the most important outside support Ernst received was from former presidential nominee and Republican Mitt Romney. While Romney has directly helped Ernst by appearing in a television ad aired by the Chamber of Commerce and by making an appearance for Ernst on the campaign trail, his more important contributions have come indirectly.

    Both Ernst’s campaign manager and treasurer are former Romney staffers. The consulting group Ernst hired is headed by a former Romney adviser. And Ernst has also received much support from the PAC America Rising, headed by former Romney campaign manager Matt Rhoades.

    The greatest assistance from America Rising came with its release of a video showing Ernst’s Democratic opposition for the Senate seat in the fall, Bruce Braley, potentially alienating Iowa voters by insulting the most popular politician in Iowa, Charles Grassley, by calling him “a farmer from Iowa who never went to law school.”

    Coincidentally (or not), Ernst released her “Squeal” video, which spoke to her farming roots, the same day as America Rising released the Braley video, rocketing Ernst’s popularity amongst Iowa voters almost overnight.

    If Ernst wants to become Iowa’s first female Republican Senator, however, she is going to have to hope for much more outside help to come. As it currently stands, Braley has a five-point advantage in the early polls. That, coupled with the fact that he was unopposed in the primary and has a $2.3 million fund to pull from, puts Ernst at a disadvantage going into the fall campaign.

    Image via Facebook

  • Minimum Wage Hike Shut Down by GOP

    Minimum Wage Hike Shut Down by GOP

    The federally-mandated Minimum Wage has been at $7.25 an hour since 2009. If Senate Democrats, and President Obama, had had their way, that amount would have gone up to $10.10. But that effort has been brought to a grinding halt by the Republicans in the Senate.

    Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa (Dem) introduced the bill for a vote in the Senate. According to ABC News, the bill was evidently intended to be a midterm election ploy. The idea was to bring a measure to the floor that gave working Americans a raise, and dare the Republicans to vote it down.

    Senator Harkin nearly taunted the GOP prior to the vote. “Who’s going to vote to give these people a fair shot at the American dream? And who’s going to vote against it?”

    But vote against it they did. Of course, that’s not exactly how things work in the Senate. The vote was actually about whether to continue debate on the bill or to allow it to come to the floor for a vote. For the bill to be brought to the floor would have required 60 votes, but the motion to bring it to the floor went 54-42, along party lines.

    In an interesting procedural move, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid voted with the Republicans, which would allow him to call for another vote on the measure. This is because Democrats want to continue to keep this issue before Americans as the midterm elections draw nearer.

    Most Americans support the notion of raising the Minimum Wage, but those that oppose it fall almost exclusively into two camps: Tea Party Republicans and business leaders.

    The Guardian reports that President Obama made election year hay with this vote, saying, “By preventing even a vote on this bill, they prevented a raise for nearly 28 million hardworking Americans.” The president then tied the GOP’s stance to election activities, calling for Americans to voice their own will.

    “If there is any good news here it is that Republicans in Congress don’t get the last word on this issue or any issue. You do, the American people, the voters.”

    President Obama had previously thrown down the gauntlet on the Minimum Wage issue by signing an executive order to raise the minimum wage for all federal contractors to $10.10 an hour. So some people are already going to get that raise.

    But the GOP counters that such a raise is irresponsible.

    “You think you can pay somebody $10.10 an hour in a McDonald’s and it won’t have an impact on the cost of your Big Mac?” John Cornyn, the Republican Senate minority whip, said. “Well, you’re living in a fantasy world.”

    Image via YouTube

  • Sarah Palin Talks Waterboarding, Baptism

    Sarah Palin Talks Waterboarding, Baptism

    Former Governor of Alaska and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin gave a speech at the National Rifle Association’s annual convention in Indianapolis Saturday, in which she’d sensationally discussed her opinions concerning the Obama administration’s policy on terrorists and firearms.

    Regarding her views on how she would deal with suspected “enemies who would utterly annihilate America – they who’d obviously have information on plots,” Palin said, “if I were in charge, they would know that waterboarding is how we baptize terrorists.” The NRA crowd erupted in applause as Palin commented, “Oh, but you can’t offend them (the terrorists), can’t make them feel uncomfortable, not even a smidgen.”

    Here is a clip of Palin’s speech:

    Palin was able to further rile the audience while espousing her perspective regarding the constitutional right to bear arms. The former governor urged those in attendance to fight for their gun liberties, and stated that their efforts are “needed now more than ever because every day, we are seeing more and more efforts to strip away our Second Amendment rights.” Palin sees the Obama administration as attempting to further control the American people by attempting to further control their guns.

    Palin, always a polarizing political figure, ruffled some feathers with her baptism comment, as seen on Twitter:

    The baptismal waterboarding comment isn’t the first time Palin found a way to draw attention to herself and induce reaction. Academy Award winner Matt Damon had chimed in regarding Palin’s 2008 vice presidential bid:

    Palin also explained in her speech that “If you control oil, you control an economy. If you control money, you control commerce. But if you control arms, you control the people, and that is what they’re trying to do.”

    The Tea Party, among others, appeared to endorse aspects of Palin’s presentation:

  • Steve Israel: GOP Base Is Unfortunately “Animated by Racism”

    Steve Israel, Democratic congressman of New York and chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told CNN’s “State of the Union” that “to a significant extent, the Republican base does have elements that are animated by racism. And that’s unfortunate.”

    Israel has not been the only high ranking Democrat to call out the Republican Party on racism. “I think race has something to do with the fact that they’re not bringing up an immigration bill,” Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told ABC News, “I’ve heard them say to the Irish, if it were just you, this would be easy.”

    Republican Greg Walden was quick to deny the accusations, calling them “both wrong and unfortunate,” according to the Associated Press.

    Despite Walden’s denial, racism remains an ugly topic for GOP lawmakers. Michael Tomasky of the Daily Beast pointed out how many Fox News articles are plagued with racist comments made in the support of Republican policy. “Now I don’t know if the people making these comments and the larger group they represent constitute 5 percent of this base or 15 or 50. It depends in part on how you define ‘base,’” Tomasky wrote, “But look at the matter this way. Say you were a Republican political consultant. Would you ever in a jillion years suggest that your candidate take on racism within the GOP as a speech topic? You most certainly would not. Your candidate would be dead immediately.”

    One use of race in Democrats’ rhetoric may be due to anticipation of midterm elections this fall. “Very risky to accuse the GOP of outright, overt racism,” an anonymous Democratic strategist told the Washington Post, “midterms are about motivating your base, so perhaps that is what’s going on. I think more Democrats should take their cues from President Obama, who to my knowledge has never accused his opponents of being racially motivated.”

    According to the Washington Post, Democrats face an uphill battle in the polls. They speculated that a house changeover would be unlikely and asserted that several senate seats held by Democrats remain vulnerable.

    “There are still deep elements of racism in this country, and that element has indeed energized the GOP rank-and-file base,” wrote Susan Mulligan of US News & World Report, “Most Republicans in Congress oppose Obamacare, and it’s not because they have some racial issue with it; it’s because they believe it’s unwarranted and unwise federal government involvement with health care. But [racists] will vote for the GOP candidate for senator because the Democrat voted for the African-American president’s signature law.”

    Image via CNN, YouTube

  • Google Continues To Build GOP Presence

    Google is reportedly getting closer and closer with the Republican party, which may come as a surprise to some given that the company was one of the top contributors to the Obama campaign.

    The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the technology giant is broadening its outreach to the GOP, has hired a “string of Republican operatives” to help it build relationships with Republican lawmakers, and has “evened out” its campaign donations which had previously favored Democrats.

    It’s not news that Google has been contributing more and more to conservative functions. The company has been increasing its contributions since 2011, and according to the Journal, some of these directly oppose some of Google’s publicized stances on gay marriage, immigration and greenhouse gas reduction.

    In 2012, the company made headlines when it sponsored a Tea Party-hosted CPAC, which Google said was a perfect chance for it to promote its Google Politics & Elections dashboard.

    According to Politico, Google Innovation Evangelist Michele Weslander Quaid is joining the board of directors of Voter Gravity, a campaign tech company, which serves GOP candidates and conservative groups. It offers products like map-based walk lists, integrated phone banking and a mobile canvassing app.

    Among noteworthy Republicans Google has added to its staff are Rep. Susan Molinari, former George W. Bush aide Rob Saliterman and GOP campaign spokesperson Jill Hazelbaker, John McCain campaign vet Niki Christoff, foerm McCain general counsel Pablo Chavez, and former Republican Speaker of the House staffer Seth Webb.

    Image via Google

  • Fewer Republicans Now Accept Evolution Than Did in 2009

    The U.S. has always had an interesting relationship with the science of evolution. As a foundational part of modern biology, the fact that species change over time is rarely debated in scientific circles (though exactly how change occurs is the subject of a lively, ongoing debate). The religious culture in the U.S., however, has traditionally seen evolution and other sciences as an enemy to certain religious beliefs. This stance has resulted in an American populace of which one-third completely reject the idea of evolution.

    Pew Research today released a new survey looking at the beliefs of Americans with regards to evolution in 2013. The firm found that a full 33% of U.S. adults agree with the statement that “humans and other living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.” That leaves a slim majority of Americans (60%) agreeing that “humans and other living things have evolved over time.” Demonstrating just how religiously-colored Americans’ beliefs on evolution are, nearly half of those who accept evolution still believe that “a supreme being guided the evolution of living things for the purpose of creating humans and other life in the form it exists today.”

    Though these overall numbers have not changed significantly in the past few years of Pew’s polling on the subject, it is now clear that members of the Republican party are rejecting evolution at an increasing rate. Pew’s poll found that 48% of Republicans polled this year reject evolution, while only 39% said the same thing back in 2009.

    This represents one of the largest demographic shifts seen in Pew’s 2013 poll. Given that the overall numbers are similar from 2009 to 2013, this could mean that the Republican party is becoming less trustful of science, more religious, or both.

    White mainline protestants, which make up a large portion of the Republican party’s base, are the most likely religious group in the U.S. to reject evolution (64%). Black protestants come next in the list with 33% rejecting evolution, and around 20% of those unaffiliated with any religion still believe humans exited in their present form since the beginning of time – more than even white mainline protestants (15%).

    Democrats have shifted their views on evolution as well, though only slightly. 27% of Democrats now reject evolution, down 3% from the 30% who said the same in 2009. The Republican shift has widened the gap between the two main U.S. political parties’ acceptance of evolution, which widened from 10% in 2009 to 24% this year.

  • The GOP’s Rosa Parks Racism Tweet Draws Criticism

    On December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus in Montgomery, Alabama for a white person. As most people know, this refusal led to Parks being arrested, and she later became known as “The Mother of the Civil Rights Movement.” Many people celebrated Parks’ contributions yesterday, and one group has received a lot of criticism for their wording in a commemoration made on Twitter.

    The Republican National Committee (RNC) made a tweet yesterday thanking Parks for her role in the civil rights movement and for ending racism. The GOP already gets a lot of flak for policies that some believe to be racist, such as their stance on illegal immigration. As such, not many people were willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and just assume the tweet was incorrectly worded.

    Twitter users were very quick to point out that racism hasn’t ended, so the GOP amended their statement a few hours later. Check out the original tweet below.

    A spokesperson for the GOP said that the tweet was referring to RNC chair Reince Priebus’s statement regarding Rosa Parks and just accidentally left off part of the quote. Priebus’s statement said “We remember and honor Rosa Parks today for the role she played in fighting racism and ending segregation.”

    Here are some of the responses to the tweet:

    After receiving hundreds of angry comments about the tweet, the RNC posted a follow-up:

    Once some of the angry tweets were out of the way, a lot of Twitter users began having a little fun with the GOP’s Rosa Parks tweet. Using the hashtag #RacismEndedWhen, Twitter users came up with a bunch of funny comments that poked fun at the GOP.

    [Image via Twitter]