WebProNews

Tag: Google lawsuit

  • Facebook, Google Get Sued by Washington State Over Political Ad Records

    Facebook, Google Get Sued by Washington State Over Political Ad Records

    Washington has filed a lawsuit against Facebook and Google over their inability to show their records on who purchased political ads on the platform. The two companies were reportedly paid millions for political ads but have failed in publishing key information, like the advertiser’s address, that’s required by law.

    Washington legislation mandates that advertisers collate and store key information on political ads, including the advertiser or buyer’s name and address, cost of the ad, and the candidate’s name, party or the proposal that’s being opposed or supported.

    The lawsuits have been filed by the Bob Ferguson, the Attorney General of Washington State. Ferguson stated in a press release that “Washingtonians have a right to know who’s paying for the political advertising they see.”

    Washington law states that anyone has the right to visit an advertiser and ask for information regarding political ads. The lawsuit claims that both Facebook and Google did not or could not provide this information when a reporter requested them. As a matter of fact, the two companies have not complied with this law since 2013. Now the Attorney General is thinking of levying fines and injunctions against the two corporations.

    The lawsuits filed by the Attorney General are noteworthy as they follow on the heels of increased criticism regarding the involvement of technology companies in perceived election manipulation and the dissemination of “fake news.”

    Facebook and Google have already taken steps to manage this problem. For instance, Mark Zuckerberg’s company will establish a political ads archive and will reportedly label all such advertisements. Google is also set to develop an online archive of political ads that ran on its platform. Facebook is also now demanding identity verification for all issue-based and election advertisements. However, it seems these measures are not enough and the general public remains skeptical that they will make a difference.

    The two companies have been given 20 days to reply to the lawsuit filed by the state of Washington.

    Rob Leathern, Facebook’s Director of Product Management, has revealed that the company is introducing tools that will “set a new standard for transparency in digital advertising.” He also added that Attorney General Ferguson has asked crucial questions and that Facebook is looking forward “to resolving this matter with his office quickly.”

    Meanwhile, a spokesperson from Google stated that the company is “committed to transparency and disclosure in political advertising” and that they’re already reviewing the complaint and will soon be coordinating with the office of the Attorney General.

    [Featured image via Pixabay]

  • Google and Oracle Ordered to Reveal Shill Bloggers

    Google and Oracle Ordered to Reveal Shill Bloggers

    The court battle between Google and Oracle has been long and brutal for both companies. Each was forced to submit data and information to the court that they would rather have kept secret. When Oracle’s claim that Google illegally used Java patents in its Android mobile OS was finally dismissed, the entire debacle ended up looking as if it was just a huge money sink. For Oracle especially, the lawsuit was a longshot bet that didn’t pay off.

    With a trial as large and as complicated as this one, though, the wrap-up of the trial is still being conducted. One of the loose ends the judge in the case, U.S. District Judge William Alsup, wants tied-up is who Google and/or Oracle may have paid to write about the case, including bloggers, journalists, commentators, and authors. Alsup’s court order makes it clear that he believes such information might be valuable in case of appeal or remand. From the court order:

    The Court is concerned that the parties and/or counsel herein may have retained or paid print or internet authors, journalists, commentators or bloggers who have and/or may publish comments on the issues in this case. Although proceedings in this matter are almost over, they are not fully over yet and, in any event, the disclosure required by this order would be of use on appeal or on any remand to make clear whether any treatise, article, commentary or analysis on the issues posed by this case are possibly influenced by financial relationships to the parties or counsel. Therefore, each side and its counsel shall file a statement herein clear identifying all authors, journalists, commentators or bloggers who have reported or commented on any issues in this case and who have received money (other than normal subscription fees) from the party or its counsel during the pendency of this action. This disclosure shall be filed by NOON ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 17, 2012.

    It will be very interesting to see just how much each of these companies invests in tailor-made press coverage. It will also be a revealing look into just how deep the paid blogosphere goes. With a lawsuit as nasty as this one, in which both companies’ CEOs were dragged into the courtroom to testify, it comes as no surprise that the battle extended beyond the court room and into the tech press.

  • Google Faces Class-Action Suit: Violation of Privacy

    Yes, more complaints over Google’s new privacy policy. This time they come from consumers in New York and California who claim the new policy directly violates the old policy which claims it will not share information from one service with another, Google owned or not.

    Both plaintiffs bring a class-action suit against the technology representing all users holding accounts from August 2004 through the beginning of March of this year when the new policy went into effect. The lawsuits claim that Google is in violation of the Federal Wiretap Act, the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, and several other federal and state laws regarding electronic privacy and communication storage.

    If you remember before the new privacy policy went into effect March 1st, most of Google’s products had separate policies that addressed privacy concerns. The introduction of the new unified policy caused a lot of ruckus for users, lawmakers, and other interest parties.

    These lawsuits seem to be an inevitability for Google who ignored a slew of complains, not the least of which was from the European Union, asking the technology giant to delay the launch of their new policies. There’s no way to tell what the court will rule on these cases, but it seems Google has pushed users over the edge with their increasing efforts to bring the public more relevant adds, as they put it.

    Lets see what others are thinking about these new lawsuits:

    Another day, another #privacy lawsuit – Google faces class action lawsuits against new privacy policy http://t.co/xMs06NpI #socmed 1 hour ago via HootSuite ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Class action lawsuit filed against #Google over changes to #Privacy Policy Rules http://t.co/pUXSTLD8 Google’s lawyers are really busy !!! 9 hours ago via TweetDeck ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Google users sue company over ‘deceptive’ privacy changes: Three men have filed a lawsuit against Google Inc. ov… http://t.co/e0HWrgXV 12 hours ago via twitterfeed ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Evil Google doesnt care. Period. @esqcounsel: Google ignores small claims privacy lawsuit – The Inquirer http://t.co/yR1sXBAt via @INQ 1 day ago via Gravity! ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Just filed for a default judgment against #Google in my lawsuit over their recent #privacy policy changes 1 day ago via Seesmic ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Facebook, Twitter, 16 Others Sued for Alleged Privacy Issues http://t.co/MKCGRRmz 2 days ago via twitterfeed ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Just filed for a default judgment against #Google in my lawsuit over their recent #privacy policy changes 1 day ago via Seesmic ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto