WebProNews

Tag: Forrester

  • Google’s AppSheet Automation Now Available

    Google’s AppSheet Automation Now Available

    Google has made its low-code automation tool, AppSheet Automation, generally available.

    Google bought AppSheet, one of the leading no-code development platforms, at the beginning of 2020. The company has been building on that acquisition by developing AI-based automation to help organizations automate their business processes.

    Automation is more important than ever as companies and industries try to return to normal. According to Forrester, “automation has been a major force reshaping work since long before the pandemic; now, it’s taking on a new urgency in the context of business risk and resiliency… As we emerge from the crisis, firms will look to automation as a way to mitigate the risks that future crises pose to the supply and productivity of human workers.”

    Google is clearly working to position AppSheet Automation as the platform of choice for companies looking to improve their automation.

    Last fall, we announced early access for AppSheet Automation, a significant addition to AppSheet, our no-code development platform, that leverages Google AI to make it easier to automate business processes. Today, as part of our mission to further support the future of work, we are making AppSheet Automation generally available (GA). AppSheet Automation empowers even those without coding skills to reshape their own work with powerful new features including smarter extraction of structured data from documents and compatibility with a wider range of data sources like Google Workspace Sheets and Drive.

    Google says companies around the world are already using AppSheet. AppSheet Automation should open up important new possibilities.

  • Study Shows Google Apps For Work Saves Businesses Big Money

    Study Shows Google Apps For Work Saves Businesses Big Money

    Google commissioned Forrester Consulting to look at the total economic impact (TEI) of the value Google Apps for Work customers get out of the product. The study spans three years of organizations’ use of it, including the moving from legacy on-premise solutions to Google’s cloud-based product.

    Google for Work president Amit Singh says, “To quantify the complete value of Google Apps for Work, including collaboration and productivity benefits, they interviewed six of our current customers. They then aggregated each piece of customer feedback to create a representative composite organization on which to base the development of a Total Economic Impact model.”

    “The composite organization is a global B2B multinational services company with 10,000 employees using Google Apps for Work and $4 billion in annual revenue,” he adds. “The analysis they completed showed that this composite organization would realize millions in collaboration and mobility efficiencies in the course of three years.”

    According to the findings, Google Apps for Work generated a risk-adjusted $17.1 million in benefits and ROI of 304%. It also suggests that the collaboration tools save employees about two hours per week, which adds up to over $8 million in savings over the three-year period. It also says the ability for employees to work from anywhere and join meetings remotely saves about $5 million in 3 years, while decommissioning legacy servers, software and phone systems saves another $4 million.

    Take a look at the infographic Google is sharing:

    googleworkinfo

    Images via Google

  • Percentage Of B2B Commerce Happening Online On The Rise

    Percentage Of B2B Commerce Happening Online On The Rise

    B2B e-commerce in the United States is projected to reach $1.13 trillion by 2020, according to Forrester, which just released its new report US B2B eCommerce Forecast: 2015 to 2020. That’s up from $780 billion this year, according to the firm.

    In 2020 B2B e-commerce will constitute 12.1% of the total $9.39 trillion US B2B commerce market, it says. Forrester analyst Andy Hoar sums up some of the report’s key points in a blog post.

    Changes to B2B buyer preferences. Today, 74% of B2B buyers research at least one-half of their work purchases online. In addition, 30% of today’s B2B buyers complete at least half of their work purchases online. With that percentage nearly doubling to 56% by 2017, B2B sellers will see a significant volume of offline business move online in the next few years.

    The opportunity for B2B firms to reduce the cost to serve customers. B2B companies report cutting their cost to serve dramatically by migrating customers online. In addition, in a 2013 Forrester survey, 56% of B2B eCommerce executives said that they have certain customers that they can only profitably support online.

    The value of building loyal multichannel B2B customers. Omnichannel customers spend more than single-channel, offline-only customers. For example, 60% of B2B companies report that their B2B buyers spend more overall when those customers interact with multiple channels. Omnichannel B2B customers are also more likely to become repeat and long-term customers.

    B2B e-commerce is growing rapidly in other parts of the world as well.

    B2B e-commerce from Chinese SMEs jumped by 30% in 2014, according to recent data from iResearch data.

    Citing data from B2B-Center, Pymnts.com reports that online corporate and government purchases “ballooned by 40 percent” in the first nine months of last year compared with the same period of the prior year.

    IndianRetailer.com recently looked at a Walmart report projecting that India’s B2B e-commerce industry will grow to $700 billion by 2020 from $300 billion.

  • Forrester Looks At The Hows And Whys Of B2B Ecommerce

    Forrester Looks At The Hows And Whys Of B2B Ecommerce

    Forrester has a new report out looking at B2B ecommerce finding what it describes as “solid evidences on the impressive financial successes achieved by companies that have taken the lead in implementing B2B ecommerce.”

    The report found that 89% of respondents agreed that implementing ecommerce increased annual company revenue by an average of 55%. 98% all of them said their ecommerce solution was important in meeting their goals to grow revenue, and 90% said it was for attracting new customers. 90% also said it was important to improving customer retention/satisfaction. 92% said it was important in lowering costs, and 89% said it helped them gain a competitive market advantage.

    88% of respondents said they agreed that implementing ecommerce drove higher profitability per order, and 84% agreed that it drove lower cost per order. 81% said it increased average order value.

    12% said 50% of their revenue booked by their ecommerce system is incremental revenue for the company. 16% said 40% to 49% of it was. 27% said 20% to 29%, and only 2% said 0% to 9%.

    “While the value of eCommerce solutions for selling to businesses online is undeniable, many B2B companies balk at the thought of a complex and costly implementation process,” the firm says. “B2B companies should carefully define project goals and objectives, involve users throughout the implementation process, and engage with knowledgeable experts, both internally and externally.”

    42% of respondents said they have deployed their current core ecommerce solution as software-as-a-service (SaaS)/platform-as-a-service (PaaS) and hosted off site. 24% said theirs is a hybrid (started SaaS, plan to transition to on-premises). 17% said on-premises. 8% said they started as SaaS and have already transitioned to on-premises. 9% started on premises and have either already transitioned to SaaS or are doing so.

    You can find the study available for download here.

    Image via Forrester

  • Forrester Says Marketers Need To Be Using Google+

    Forrester Research surveyed 60,000 adults in the U.S. about the social sites they use, and 22% said they visit Google+ each month, which is the same as they got for Twitter, and greater than what they heard for LinkedIn, Pinterest, or Instagram.

    This is one of the reasons Forrester’s Nate Elliott (yeah, the guy that said brands are becoming “disillusioned” with Facebook) thinks “every marketer should use Google Plus.”

    “On average, top brands have collected 90% as many fans on Plus as on Twitter (In fact, the brands we studied have more followers on Google Plus than on YouTube, Pinterest and Instagram combined.),” he writes. “Second, and more importantly, Google Plus generates much more brand engagement than you think. Recently we studied more than 3 million user interactions with more than 2,500 brand posts on seven social networks. The result? Brands’ Google Plus posts generated nearly as much engagement per follower as their Facebook posts — and almost twice as much engagement per follower as their Twitter posts.”

    You can find Forrester’s report on “The Case For Google Plus” here. It’s worth noting that this came out on March 31st, in case you’re thinking “April Fools’ joke”.

    In fact, Shareaholic also released some interesting findings this week about engagement after the click. According to them, YouTube and Google+ are much better for generating on-site engagement than Facebook.

    As brands grow increasingly frustrated with the way they’re being treated on Facebook. Networks like Google+ and Twitter are only going to look more appealing, and studies like these could just nudge some in the Google direction.

    Images via Forrester, Shareaholic

  • Forrester: Brands Are Disillusioned With Facebook

    Facebook is failing marketers, according to Forrester’s Vice President and Principal Analyst, who says he’s talked to brands, who are becoming increasingly frustrated.

    This isn’t the first time Nate Elliott has criticized Facebook. Last fall, he wrote an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg about Facebook failing marketers, generating a fair amount of industry discussion. In that, he told the CEO that a Forrester survey of nearly 400 marketers and eBusiness executives told the firm that “Facebook creates less business value than any other digital marketing opportunity.”

    He included this graph:

    Facebook

    And that was before the company implemented its devastating News Feed algorithm changes, which all but killed organic visibility for brands who spent years acquiring “likes” from customers who wanted to see updates in their feeds.

    Even since then, Facebook has started cramming in more content from Pages users actually haven’t liked.

    But organic reach is one thing. Paid is another, right? According to Elliott, Facebook’s paid ad products “aren’t delivering results for most marketers” either.

    “Brands and agencies are now openly talking about their discontent,” he writes in a new blog post (via Business Insider). “Every day I talk to brands that are disillusioned with Facebook and are now placing their bets on other social sites — but few of them want to go on the record. Lately, though, more brands and agencies have started speaking openly to the media about how Facebook is failing them. One former Facebook advertiser referred to Facebook as ‘one of the most lucrative grifts of all time.’”

    That would be James Del, head of Gawker’s content studio in a recent DigiDay article. The rest of his statement was, “First, they convinced brands they needed to purchase all their fans and likes — even though everyone knows you can’t buy love; then, Facebook continues to charge those same brands money to speak to the fans they just bought.”

    “Marketers are worried many of their fans are ‘fake,’” continues Elliott. “Many marketers and many publishers are reporting that huge percentages of their fans come from emerging markets where they didn’t expect to find an audience. The kicker? They’re saying many of those fans don’t seem to interact with people or with branded content — they seem to do little other than ‘like’ thousands and thousands of brand pages. The conclusion some marketers are coming to: The paid ads Facebook encourages them to buy often lead to ‘fake’ fans generated by ‘like farms.’”

    He goes on to mention that one B2B marketer told him that Facebook’s “constant rule changes” are the biggest problem they have, and concludes that marketers don’t believe Facebook will ever “live up to its promise and become a valuable marketing channel.”

    This hasn’t stopped Facebook from raking in the ad dollars. In January, Facebook reported that its ad revenue was up 75% year-over-year at $2.34 billion (with 53% of that from mobile, which itself was up 23%).

    And yes, on the organic side of Facebook’s News Feed, things really are that bad. Earlier this month, research from Ogilvy found that the average organic reach of content published on brands’ Facebook Pages had fallen to 6% by last month (compared to 12% in October).

    As you can see, it’s even worse for Pages with more likes. Way to reward the brands creating the most engagement, Facebook.

    Those are some depressing lines, eh? They don’t exactly look like they’re about to change paths in March do they?

    Images via Forrester, Ogilvy

  • Forrester Report Finds Behavioral Marketing Data Is Working, But 45% Aren’t Capturing Data

    Forrester Report Finds Behavioral Marketing Data Is Working, But 45% Aren’t Capturing Data

    Forrester has put out a new report commissioned by Silverpop, surveying 157 U.S. marketers on behavioral data and automation.

    “Of the findings, the most notable might be that while marketers who leverage buyer insight / data in their campaigns experience significant biz benefits above their peers, behavioral data still remains, per Forrester, ‘the greatest untapped marketing asset’—with only 45% actually capturing this data in a way that’s both efficient and actionable,” a spokesperson tells WebProNews. “Having data is important, but remember, brands have to be able to use it—this means consolidating it within a single unified database for easy handling, etc. ”

    Essentially marketers have a lot of data, but it’s inherently disorganized and messy.

    The study was conducted in May, and found that when asked to assess the potential gain of taking specific actions with prospective customers based on their behaviors across channels, ROI and customer satisfaction/loyalty were the biggest perceived benefits (44%/42%).

    It also found that behavioral marketers are getting more sales. In the B2B space, they attributed 34% of total sales pipelines to behavioral marketing (about 10% higher than their peers at 26%). B2C marketers attributed 26% of their revenues to their behavioral programs (with peers at just 21%).

    “While marketers have come a long way in automating their efforts, not all are using marketing automation at its full potential and incorporating buyer behavior into their campaigns in order to deliver the most personal and engaging customer experiences possible,” said Bryan Brown, Silverpop director of product strategy. “Data is the fuel that powers today’s digital marketing campaigns and no insight is more valuable than what buyers tell you based on the actions they take. By capturing and then quickly acting on this behavioral data, marketers can form very rewarding individual relationships that lead to revenue and a deep sense of loyalty that can last a lifetime.”

    The report can be found here (download page).

    Image: Forrester

  • Surprise, Someone Else Says Facebook Is Dead In The Water

    George Colony, CEO of Forrester Research, doesn’t think that Facebook is going to survive in the world of technological competition in the future. In fact, he thinks they’re “toast.”

    Speaking at the keynote of Forrester’s European forum in Paris, Colony had this to say about the biggest social network in the world:

    “I think Facebook is toast. The company is in major trouble around mobile engagement and the app Internet.”

    Of course, Colony’s concern with Facebook is not uncommon. The “someone else” part of the title refers to highly publicized comments from one analyst back when Facebook’s stock price was really (really, really, really) hurting. Ironfire Capital’s Eric Jackson said that Facebook would “disappear in the way that Yahoo has disappeared” within the next 5 to 8 years.

    His concern? Facebook’s ability to monetize mobile, which he predicted as the force that would dominate the future.

    Forrester’s Colony echoed those sentiments today. According to PCWorld, he said that “mobile engagement, built on architectural change brought about by the app internet will replace the broader Web as the focus of innovation and change.”

    And apparently, Facebook won’t be a part of that.

    Facebook’s IPO blunder was no doubt a wake up call for many investors and prospective investors. And the company struggle to monetize mobile was always at the center of that doubt, especially after Facebook amended their IPO filing to state that they “do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the use of Facebook mobile products, and [their] ability to do so successfully is unproven.”

    It’s still unclear whether Facebook will be able to truly monetize mobile and if it will bring in an untold stream of revenue, but some recent reports suggest that the company may have reason to hope. In a period following the point where Facebook began offering mobile-only ad options to advertisers, mobile ads performed very well. Much better, in fact, than desktop ads (whether they be News Feed or right-side) or all other ad packages combined. One ad partner even found that the mobile-only Sponsored Stories ads had a 25x higher click-through rate than Sponsored Stories on the desktop.

    And as you know, Facebook is always looking at new ways to boost ad revenues. Two rumored services in the pipeline include a real-time bidding platform as well as location-based mobile ads.

    Colony isn’t the first, and I’m sure he won’t be the last to call time of death on Facebook. Of course, much does depend on mobile – realm that is undeniably expanding at a substantial rate. This also isn’t Colony’s first prediction to make news. Back in late 2011, he predicted the burst of the social startup bubble.

  • Forrester CEO Expresses Misgivings About Mark Zuckerberg

    George Colony, who founded Forrester Research about 17 years ago and continues to act as its CEO, knows a thing or two about both the tech industry and leadership. Unfortunately for Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, that means a harsh new critique is likely to garner lots of attention over the next few days.

    (more…)

  • Forrester Analyst Lauds Google TV

    Forrester Analyst Lauds Google TV

    Google TV made something of a splash when it was first announced, earning bloggers’ approval and even some early commitments from would-be buyers.  Then everyone moved on to the next big news story.  But today, a Forrester analyst returned to the subject, claiming Google TV "is a bigger deal than you think."

    GoogleTo drive his point(s) home, Forrester analyst James McQuivey put together a 1,050-word post.  "TV matters in a way that nothing else does" was one of his more noteworthy arguments.

    "Each year, the TV drives roughly $70 billion in advertising and an equal amount in cable and satellite fees, and another $25 billion in consumer electronics sales," McQuivey pointed out.  "Plus, viewers spend 4.5 hours a day with it . . . .  Google’s goal is to get into that marketplace, eventually appropriating a healthy chunk of the billions in advertising that flow to and through the TV today with such painful inefficiency."

    And with regards to the odds of Google succeeding, the analyst later wrote, "[T]he base layer of high-speed connectivity to and in the home can support Google’s ambitions.  Plus, there’s enough content online between YouTube, Hulu, and Netflix, to make it worth the bother of connecting the TV . . ."

    Then there are Google’s partnerships to consider, with its alliance with Sony looking especially likely to provide its TV platform a way into people’s homes.

    Google TV seems liable to enjoy another wave of positive press (and in effect, free advertising) now that all of these points have been laid out.

  • 33% Of Online Pop. Pegged As “Conversationalists”

    Although you probably guessed as much, people who occasionally update their Facebook status or post something on Twitter represent a significant portion of the online community.  And today, Forrester pegged the exact portion at 33 percent.

    Forrester’s been classifying online people as inactives, spectators, joiners, collectors, critics, and creators for quite some time, and its statistics regarding these groups have provided valuable about how the online landscape is changing.

    The problem, as Forrester analyst Josh Bernoff noted earlier, is that these categories didn’t leave much room for normal Facebook and Twitter users.

    So the conversationalists classification was introduced to represent Twitter users and Facebook users who make at least one status update per week.  Exactly 33 percent of online folks should fall into this grouping, and Bernoff added, "They’re 56% female, more than any other group in the ladder."

    Also, "While they’re among the youngest of the groups, 70% are still 30 and up."

    The above diagram pretty well shows the breakdown of other groups.  Now we just get to sit back and see how quickly people travel up the ladder as the social Web gains momentum.

    Related Articles:

    > Twitter Earns Itself A Candy Heart Phrase

    > Employers Using Social Networks To Screen Employees

    > Content Can Now Go Viral More Easily With Facebook