WebProNews

Tag: Firefox

  • Yahoo Tries Another Aggressive Tactic To Get People To Change Default Search

    Yahoo Tries Another Aggressive Tactic To Get People To Change Default Search

    Yahoo is pretty serious about trying to get users to choose its search engine as their default experience. Since last fall, we’ve seen the company try a variety of strategies. Now, they’re even trying to get people to switch to Yahoo when they…install Java updates.

    That’s the word form The Wall Street Journal, which reports that the company announced a partnership with Oracle that will see users (starting this month) who install or update Oracle’s Java software getting prompted to make Yahoo the default search for their web browser. This is a big deal considering that Java is the most popular programming language and Java software is reportedly installed on 89% of desktop computers.

    The Journal shares a screenshot of what users will see, which is a dialog box prompting them to “Get the best of the web with Yahoo” with a checkbox to “Set Yahoo as your homepage and default search engine on Chrome and Internet Explorer, plus get Yahoo as your new tab page on Chrome.”

    It continues: “By clicking “Next” and accepting Yahoo Search offerings, your use is subject to the Yahoo Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. De-selecting the checkbox above declines these optional search offers and proceeds with the rest of the install process.”

    So you’ll even have to uncheck the pre-checked box to avoid having Yahoo take over your browser.

    A Yahoo spokesperson told the publication, “We have definitely made sure that our onboarding process is one that is highly transparent and gives users choice.”

    This is only the latest in a series of movies Yahoo has made to try and increase its users through the changing of their default browser search experiences. As you probably know, Yahoo became the default experience in Firefox in the U.S. through a deal with Mozilla.

    Since then, it has displayed a link at the top of its homepage telling visitors to “Upgrade to the new Firefox” if they’re using another browser such as Chrome.

    We recently found that they were emailing users to tell them to “stay secure & protected across the web” by downloading Firefox. These emails said nothing of search, and were all about how Firefox is “loaded with features that protect your personal information and keep you safe online.”

    These were sent by Yahoo. Not Mozilla.

    Google has responded to some of Yahoo tactics by also trying to convince Firefox users to switch back. I’d imagine that as Yahoo continues its aggressiveness, Google will likely ramp up its own. This is an interesting battle to watch for sure.

    Lead image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Yahoo Emails Users To Tell Them To Stay Safe With Firefox

    Yahoo Emails Users To Tell Them To Stay Safe With Firefox

    Yahoo really wants its users to to “stay secure & protected across the web,” and thinks the best course of action for them to attain such security is to get Firefox. At least that’s the message the company is sending Yahoo Mail users:

    As you can see, the message is strictly in the interest of users’ safety.

    “Firefox is loaded with features that protect your personal information and keep you safe online,” it says.

    Yahoo couldn’t possibly want you to use Firefox because it recently took over the default search experience in the web browser. Wonderful scare tactics, Yahoo.

    Those who have been following the search industry closely know that Yahoo and Google have been battling for Firefox’ users preferences. Yahoo wants to make sure people use Firefox in the first place, and that when they do, they don’t switch back to Google. Google is desperately trying to get people to switch back.

    In case you haven’t been following, the partnership between Yahoo and Mozilla began in November, and Yahoo saw some pretty positive early results in search market share as a direct result of that partnership, though things seem to have slowed down.

    Since the beginning, Yahoo has included a link to get Firefox on the top of its homepage and other popular properties.

    Eventually, Google started putting out messages and mini-tutorials like this:

    Google also started telling Firefox users who visited its homepage to set the default experience back to Google with a message saying, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default search engine.”

    Then, Google started showing big ad-like messages at the top of unrelated search results pages, telling users to switch search engines:

    Users who click “learn how” are presented with this:

    If you click “no thanks,” it just disappears. If you ignore Google’s prompt, it goes away after two or three searches.

    Earlier this year, Google’s then-CFO Patrick Pichette was asked about Yahoo’s partnership with Mozilla on Google’s recent earnings call. He said:

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them….partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    I thought Google was going pretty far with the big ads on search results pages, but I think I have to declare Yahoo the frontrunner now for most intrusive browser begging.

    Mozilla is reportedly ramping up its marketing efforts, so this may be related to that, but it does come with a big Yahoo logo on the top. The from line is also Yahoo.

    Images via Yahoo, Google

  • Is Google Looking Desperate in Firefox?

    Is Google Looking Desperate in Firefox?

    Google is getting louder about wanting Firefox users to switch their default browser back to its search engine.

    As you may know, Mozilla replaced Google with Yahoo as the default search provider in Firefox in the United States back in November. This led to Yahoo gaining some market share in the months after.

    Unfortunately for Yahoo, that growth seems to have stalled. Based on data from StatCounter, Google hit its lowest share in the U.S. in January, while Yahoo reached its highest in over five years. That Yahoo growth flatlined in February, however, though the search engine was mostly able to hang on to the additions it already made.

    search market in the u.s.

    Since Yahoo and Mozilla made the deal, Yahoo has been displaying a message at the top of its homepage and other properties, encouraging users to “upgrade to the new Firefox”.

    Google has also been displaying messages trying to get users to switch their default search experience back to Google Search for a while. In January, it put out this little video guide:

    Google also started telling Firefox users who visited its homepage to set the default experience back to Google with a message saying, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default search engine.”

    Now, Google is taking things up a notch. It’s actually showing big ad-like messages at the top of unrelated search results pages, telling users to switch search engines:

    If you click “learn how,” you’re presented with this:

    If you click “no thanks,” it just disappears. If you ignore Google’s prompt, it goes away after two or three searches.

    Search Engine Land describes this strategy as “begging” and “desperate” on Google’s part.

    Outgoing Google CFO Patrick Pichette was asked about Yahoo’s partnership with Mozilla on Google’s recent earnings call. He said:

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them….partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    It’s interesting to see how far Google is going to get Firefox users to switch back. Soon, it could be implementing a similar strategy in Apple’s Safari browser. Google’s deal with Apple to remain the default search experience there is set to expire soon. We don’t know exactly when, but we know it’s soon.

    It’s possible that Apple could go with Google again, but speculation that it will go with another search engine like Yahoo or Bing (at least in the U.S.) has been picking up. Yahoo and Microsoft have both been said to be ready to battle for the spot. On Yahoo’s earnings call, CEO Marissa Mayer was pretty clear about really wanting to have Yahoo as the default on Safari. She said:

    The Safari platform is basically one of the premiere search engine in the world, if not the premiere search engine in the world. We are definitely in the search distribution business. I think we stated that really clearly in the past and I think with Mozilla and also in addition we brought Amazon and eBay onboard with smaller distribution partnerships in Q4, we are in search distribution business and anyone who is in that business needs to be interested in the Safari deal.

    The Safari users are among the most engaged and lucrative users in the world and it’s something that we would really like to be able to provide. We work really closely with Mozilla to ultimately bring to their users an experience that they designed and that they feel really suit those users and we welcome the opportunity with any other partner to do the same, particularly one with Apple’s volume and end user base.

    As Kara Swisher, who was liveblogging the event, said, “Mayer appeared to practically salivate at the prospect if Apple throws over Google for someone else. Issue: Microsoft. Another issue: Yahoo search technology would have to be majorly upgraded.”

    Earlier this week, Search Engine Land’s Greg Sterling predicted that Apple will not renew its Google deal (again, at least in the U.S.), saying both parties have reasons not to renew. He wrote:

    In 2011, Macquarie Capital estimated that Google earned $1.3 billion in search-related revenue from its default position on Safari. Of that, Google was supposed to have paid Apple over a billion dollars. In 2013, Morgan Stanley also estimated that Google paid Apple over $1 billion annually for the privilege of being the Safari default.

    If these figures were correct at the time, they’re likely out-of-date today. If anything, there’s more mobile search volume and more revenue than in 2011 or 2013. Google’s net profit from Safari is substantially less than the $1 billion it probably pays Apple. Google is therefore probably willing to bet that its net will go up if it walks away from the deal.

    He also noted that Google probably assumes it will get users to switch back and/or get them using its search app. It most likely would get many users back, and it would also most likely implement an aggressive switchback campaign as it’s doing in Mozilla. Still, it’s going to be an interesting narrative to watch.

  • Firefox Deal Continues To Help Yahoo, Hurt Google

    Firefox Deal Continues To Help Yahoo, Hurt Google

    In November, Yahoo and Mozilla entered a partnership that made Yahoo the default search experience on Firefox, replacing Google, which had held the spot for the past decade. The deal showed some great early results for Yahoo in terms of search market share, but the question about whether or not people would switch back to Google remained. So far, it seems that many are choosing to stick with Yahoo.

    StatCounter just put out its latest report on the subject, and found that Google is at its lowest share in the US since it’s been recording the data.

    This is the first time Google has fallen below 75%, the firm says. Yahoo, on the other hand, reached its highest US search share in over five years. They’ve been tracking these stats since July 2008.

    “Some analysts expected Yahoo to fall in January as a result of Firefox users switching back to Google. In fact Yahoo has increased US search share by half a percentage point,” said StatCounter CEO Aodhan Cullen. “It will be fascinating to see if these gains continue.”

    StatCounter also looked specifically at U.S. search share by Firefox users finding that Yahoo-on-Firefox usage nearly tripled from November to January going from 9.9% to 28.3%. During that timeframe, Google fell from 81.9% to 63.9%.

    “When we removed Firefox usage from the US search data, Yahoo’s gains and Google’s losses were erased,” said Cullen. “This highlights the importance of the default search option and the significance of the upcoming Safari search deal for the major players.”

    And Yahoo is hungry for that Safari deal. Last week, Yahoo reported its Q4 earnings, and CEO Marissa Mayer talked about the Firefox deal and the coveted Safari spot.

    “The Safari platform is basically one of the premiere search engines in the world, if not the premiere search engine in the world,” she said during a Q&A session. “We are definitely in the search distribution business. I think we stated that really clearly in the past and I think with Mozilla and also in addition we brought Amazon and eBay onboard with smaller distribution partnerships in Q4, we are in search distribution business and anyone who is in that business needs to be interested in the Safari deal.”

    “The Safari users are among the most engaged and lucrative users in the world and it’s something that we would really like to be able to provide,” she added. “We work really closely with Mozilla to ultimately bring to their users an experience that they designed and that they feel really suit those users and we welcome the opportunity with any other partner to do the same, particularly one with Apple’s volume and end user base.”

    As far as Firefox goes, it’s going to be interesting to see the market share changes for this month after more people presumably upgrade to the latest version of the browser. Yahoo is still encouraging users to do so from its homepage. Meanwhile, Google is encouraging Firefox users to switch back.

    Google also reported its earnings last week, and vaguely commented on the Yahoo Firefox deal.

    CFO Patrick Pichette said:

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them.

    And so that’s the strategy that we’re using and we just don’t comment on any of our – we’ve never commented on any of our deals, so we want comment on Mozilla either.

    Firefox users generated 14% of US internet usage in January according to StatCounter.

    Images via StatCounter

  • Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google Responds To Yahoo’s Firefox Deal On Earnings Call

    Google released its Q4 and fiscal year 2014 financial results on Thursday with full year revenue up 19% year-over-year at $66 billion and revenue of $18.1 billion for the quarter, which was a 15% year-over-year increase.

    During the company’s conference call, CFO and Senior Vice President Patrick Pichette was asked about the impact of Yahoo’s deal with Mozilla to replace Google as the default search experience in the Firefox browser. here’s what he had to say (via Seeking Alpha’s transcript):

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them.

    And so that’s the strategy that we’re using and we just don’t comment on any of our – we’ve never commented on any of our deals, so we want comment on Mozilla either.

    The subject came up again a bit later in the call, and Pichette had a little more to say:

    So on the issue of partnerships, Google has a lot of partnerships, right, it’s got – it’s an anchor of our strategy, because that actually gives us distribution, distribution is good. And so we also we look for partnerships in many spaces.

    Partnerships have to be win-wins, and in that sense, right, we’ll always look for those combinations. But also at the end of the day, there’s a second piece of the strategy, which is, as I said earlier, building amazing product, because if you build the amazing products then people want to distribute you product.

    And so that’s why, we have a meet in the whole search team that actually do this amazing job through the knowledge graph and all of the other elements of search, and no matter what the device, no matter the location, no matter the time of day. If we give you the answer as you’re looking for and 10 clicks less than it was before and then even faster and better all the time, that’s what wins, and that’s the core of what we’re focused on, and then people will find the way to get the Google.

    So, yes, partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    Google has already been showing concern about losing Mozilla. It definitely matters. Google has been trying to get people to switch back with messages like this:

    And one on the Google homepage in the Firefox browser, which says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default engine.”

    Yahoo also reported its earnings this week, and Mayer talked more about her company’s deal with Mozilla. She appears to be quite excited about it, and is clearly thirsty for a similar partnership with Apple to replace Google as the default experience in Safari. Whether or not that happens remains to be seen. Microsoft and Google both want that too.

    Last week, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014, which looked at the impact of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” the report said. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” it added. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    According to that report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Here’s Google’s full earnings release:

    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – January 29, 2015 –  Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG, GOOGL) today announced financial results for the quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

    “Google’s full year revenue for 2014 was $66 billion, up 19% year on year,” said Patrick Pichette, CFO of Google, “and this quarter, our revenue was $18.1 billion, despite strong currency headwinds.”

    Q4 Financial Summary

    Google Inc. reported consolidated revenues of $18.10 billion for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 15% compared to the fourth quarter of 2013. Google Inc. reports advertising revenues, consistent with GAAP, on a gross basis without deducting traffic acquisition costs (TAC). In the fourth quarter of 2014, TAC totaled $3.62 billion, or 22% of advertising revenues.

    Operating income, operating margin, net income, and earnings per share (EPS) are reported on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP measures, as well as free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, are described below and are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measures at the end of this release.

    • GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP net income (including net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.74 billion, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • GAAP EPS (including impact from net income (loss) from discontinued operations) in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.
    • Non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin exclude stock-based compensation (SBC) expense from continuing operations. Non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS exclude SBC expense from continuing operations, net of the related tax benefits, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations.
    • In the fourth quarter of 2014, the expense related to SBC from continuing operations and the related tax benefits were $1,201 million and $255 million compared to $873 million and $184 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. In addition, net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    On October 29, 2014, we closed the sale of Motorola Mobile business. Financial results of Motorola Mobile are presented as Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 through the date of sale.  The sale resulted in a gain of $740 million, net of tax, which was included in Net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2014.  All references to results of our operations have been retroactively restated for all prior periods to exclude the results from Motorola Mobile.

    On April 2, 2014, we issued shares of Class C capital stock as a dividend to our stockholders. Except for the number of authorized shares and par value, all references to share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for all prior periods shown to reflect the stock split, which was effected in the form of a stock dividend.

    Q4 Financial Highlights

    Revenues and Monetization – Google Inc. revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 were $18.10 billion, representing a 15% increase over fourth quarter of 2013 revenues of $15.71 billion.

    Sites Revenues – Our sites generated revenues of $12.43 billion, or 69% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014. This represents an 18% increase over fourth quarter 2013 sites revenues of $10.54 billion.

    Network Revenues – Our partner sites generated revenues of $3.72 billion, or 20% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.   This represents a 6% increase over fourth quarter 2013 network revenues of $3.52 billion.

    Other Revenues – Other revenues were $1.95 billion, or 11% of total revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014.  This represents a 19% increase over fourth quarter 2013 other revenues of $1.65 billion.

    International Revenues – Our revenues from outside of the United States totaled $10.23 billion, representing 56% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 58% in the third quarter of 2014 and 56% in the fourth quarter of 2013. Our revenues from the United Kingdom totaled $1.66 billion, representing 9% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 10% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Foreign Exchange Impact on Revenues – Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the third quarter of 2014 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $541 million higher. Excluding gains related to our foreign exchange risk management program, had foreign exchange rates remained constant from the fourth quarter of 2013 through the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 would have been $616 million higher. In the fourth quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit of $148 million to revenues through our foreign exchange risk management program, compared to $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Reconciliations of our non-GAAP international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange and hedging to GAAP international revenues are included at the end of this release.

    Paid Clicks – Aggregate paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, increased approximately 14% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 11% over the third quarter of 2014. Sites paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads we serve on Google owned and operated properties across different geographies and devices including search, YouTube engagement ads like TrueView, and other owned and operated properties including Maps and Finance, increased approximately 25% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 18% over the third quarter of 2014. Network paid clicks, which include clicks related to ads served on non-Google properties participating in our AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content, and AdMob businesses, decreased approximately 11% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 7% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Cost-Per-Click – Average cost-per-click, which includes clicks related to ads served on Google sites and the sites of our Network members, decreased approximately 3% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 3% over the third quarter of 2014. Cost-per-click for Google sites decreased approximately 8% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and decreased approximately 8% over the third quarter of 2014. Network cost-per-click increased approximately 6% over the fourth quarter of 2013 and increased approximately 10% over the third quarter of 2014.

    Traffic Acquisition Costs – Traffic acquisition costs (TAC), the portion of revenues shared with Google’s partners, increased to $3.62 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $3.31 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. TAC as a percentage of advertising revenues was 22% in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 24% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    The majority of TAC is related to amounts ultimately paid to our Network members, which totaled $2.66 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014. TAC also includes amounts paid to our distribution partners who distribute our browser or otherwise direct search queries to our website, which totaled $968 million in the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Other Cost of Revenues – Other cost of revenues, which is comprised primarily of data center operational expenses, content acquisition costs,  revenue share payments to mobile carriers and original equipment manufacturers, and hardware inventory costs, increased to $3.30 billion, or 18% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $2.94 billion, or 19% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Operating Expenses – Operating expenses, other than cost of revenues, were $6.78 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, or 37% of revenues, compared to $5.03 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, or 32% of revenues.

    Depreciation and Loss on Disposal of Property and Equipment and Amortization Expenses – Depreciation and loss on disposal of property and equipment and amortization and impairment of intangibles and other assets were $1.27 billion for the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $1.04 billion for the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) – In the fourth quarter of 2014, the total charge related to SBC from continuing operations was $1,201 million, compared to $873 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. We currently estimate SBC charges for grants made to employees prior to December 31, 2014 to be approximately $4.30 billion for 2015. This estimate does not include expenses to be recognized related to employee stock awards that are granted after December 31, 2014.

    Operating Income – GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.40 billion, or 24% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $4.43 billion, or 28% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $5.60 billion, or 31% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating income of $5.30 billion, or 34% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Interest and Other Income, Net – Interest and other income, net, was $128 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $112 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Income Taxes – Our effective tax rate was 16% for the fourth quarter of 2014.

    Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations – Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $967 million, compared to a net loss of $506 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. Net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 includes a gain of $740 million, net of tax, from the sale of Motorola Mobile business.

    Net Income – GAAP consolidated net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $4.76 billion, compared to $3.38 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP consolidated net income was $4.74 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to $4.57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.91 on 688 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $4.95 in the fourth quarter of 2013 on 682 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter of 2014 was $6.88, compared to $6.70 in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures – Net cash provided by operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2014 totaled $6.36 billion, compared to $5.24 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. In the fourth quarter of 2014, capital expenditures were $3.55 billion, the majority of which was for real estate purchases, production equipment, and data center construction. Free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of liquidity, is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. In the fourth quarter of 2014, free cash flow was $2.81 billion compared to $2.98 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013.

    We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures.

    A reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities, the GAAP measure of liquidity, is included at the end of this release.

    Cash – As of December 31, 2014, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $64.40 billion.

    Headcount – On a worldwide basis, we employed 53,600 full-time employees as of December 31, 2014, compared to 51,564 full-time employees as of September 30, 2014.

    WEBCAST AND CONFERENCE CALL INFORMATION

    A live audio webcast of Google’s fourth quarter and fiscal year 2014 earnings release call will be available at http://investor.google.com/webcast.html. The call begins today at 1:30 PM (PT) / 4:30 PM (ET). This press release, the financial tables, as well as other supplemental information including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, are also available on that site.

    We also announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business and financial performance, SEC filings, notices of investor events and our press and earnings releases, on our investor relations website (http://investor.google.com) and our investor relations Google+ page (https://plus.google.com/+GoogleInvestorRelations/posts).

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include statements regarding our investments in areas of strategic focus, our expected SBC charges, and our plans to make significant capital expenditures. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, unforeseen changes in our hiring patterns and our need to expend capital to accommodate the growth of the business, as well as those risks and uncertainties included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  and our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, which are on file with the SEC and are available on our investor relations website at investor.google.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Additional information will also be set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of January 29, 2015, and we undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law.

    ABOUT NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP EPS, free cash flow, and non-GAAP international revenues. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures,” “Reconciliation from net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow,” and “Reconciliation from GAAP international revenues to non-GAAP international revenues” included at the end of this release.

    We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. Our management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures that may not be indicative of our recurring core business operating results, meaning our operating performance excluding not only non-cash charges, such as SBC, but also discrete cash charges that are infrequent in nature. We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical performance and liquidity as well as comparisons to our competitors’ operating results. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income excluding expenses related to SBC, and, as applicable, other special items. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by revenues. Google considers these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the effect of SBC, and as applicable, other special items so that Google’s management and investors can compare Google’s recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types that companies can use under FASB ASC Topic 718, Google’s management believes that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes SBC allows investors to make meaningful comparisons between Google’s recurring core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing Google’s management with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating Google’s own recurring core business operating results over different periods of time. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income versus operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes some costs, namely, SBC, that are recurring. SBC has been and will continue to be for the foreseeable future a significant recurring expense in Google’s business. Second, SBC is an important part of our employees’ compensation. Third, the components of the costs that we exclude in our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that our peer companies exclude when they report their results of operations. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and EPS. We define non-GAAP net income as net income excluding expenses related to SBC and, as applicable, other special items less the related tax effects, as well as net income (loss) from discontinued operations. The tax effects of SBC and, as applicable, other special items are calculated using the tax-deductible portion of SBC, and, as applicable, other special items, and applying the entity-specific, U.S. federal and blended state tax rates.  We define non-GAAP EPS as non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted average outstanding shares, on a fully-diluted basis. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that Google uses non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we exclude from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS the tax effects associated with SBC and, as applicable, other special items. Without excluding these tax effects, investors would only see the gross effect that excluding these expenses had on our operating results. The same limitations described above regarding Google’s use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS. Management compensates for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP EPS together with net income and EPS calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after the acquisition of property and equipment, including information technology infrastructure and land and buildings, can be used for strategic opportunities, including investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions, and strengthening the balance sheet. Analysis of free cash flow also facilitates management’s comparisons of our operating results to competitors’ operating results. A limitation of using free cash flow versus the GAAP measure of net cash provided by operating activities as a means for evaluating Google is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash balance from operations for the period because it excludes cash used for capital expenditures during the period. Our management compensates for this limitation by providing information about our capital expenditures on the face of the statement of cash flows and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Google has computed free cash flow using the same consistent method from quarter to quarter and year to year.

    Non-GAAP international revenues. We define non-GAAP international revenues as international revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and hedging activities. Non-GAAP international revenues are calculated by translating current quarter revenues using prior quarter and prior year exchange rates, as well as excluding any hedging gains realized in the current quarter. We consider non-GAAP international revenues as a useful metric as it facilitates management’s internal comparison to our historical performance.

    The accompanying tables have more details on the non-GAAP financial measures that are most directly comparable to GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations between these financial measures.

    Image via Google

  • Yahoo Really Wants That Apple Deal

    Yahoo Really Wants That Apple Deal

    Yahoo made some big waves in late 2014 when it partnered with Mozilla to replace Google as the default search experience in Firefox. Apple’s similar deal with Google is near its expiration, and Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seems really interested in that.

    Do you think Apple should drop Google and go with a different search provider like Yahoo or Microsoft? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Yahoo reported its Q4 earnings on Tuesday. During the conference call, Mayer said this about the Mozilla partnership in her prepared remarks (via SeekingAlpha’s transcript):

    External sources estimate that Mozilla has 3% to 5% of the North American search market. So this is a significant opportunity. We began serving Mozilla partly through December, so we’ve not yet had a complete calendar month of data on the deal but we are already impressed with the volume Mozilla search has brought to our marketplace and the insightfulness and agility of the Mozilla team…Our new partnership with Mozilla gives us reason to be optimistic that search will continue to be a growth story.

    During the question-and-answer session, Mayer was asked about Yahoo’s ongoing search partnership with Microsoft (which she reportedly hates) as well as the company’s new deal with Mozilla to become the default search experience in the Firefox browser. She said the “search alliance” hits the halfway point later in Q1, and that the deal has provisions that allow them to consider adjustments to its relationship with Microsoft. They’re actively exploring options and different models, she said.

    She said:

    On Mozilla overall we haven’t disclosed the financial arrangement between the two companies…it’s about 3% to 5% of the North America search market and overall, the volume’s been fantastic and the teams are just terrific to work with. That said it’s a really significant partnership and will always take time to equilibrate and tune our performance with the Mozilla traffic. And so we are very hopeful about it but at this point really too early to tell.

    There have been reports that Yahoo is also interested in taking Google’s place as the default search experience in Apple’s Safari browser, which would be huge for the company in terms of gaining more significant market share. Apple has in recent years been distancing itself more and more from Google. Mayer was asked about this during the Q&A as well. She said:

    The Safari platform is basically one of the premiere search engine in the world, if not the premiere search engine in the world. We are definitely in the search distribution business. I think we stated that really clearly in the past and I think with Mozilla and also in addition we brought Amazon and eBay onboard with smaller distribution partnerships in Q4, we are in search distribution business and anyone who is in that business needs to be interested in the Safari deal.

    The Safari users are among the most engaged and lucrative users in the world and it’s something that we would really like to be able to provide. We work really closely with Mozilla to ultimately bring to their users an experience that they designed and that they feel really suit those users and we welcome the opportunity with any other partner to do the same, particularly one with Apple’s volume and end user base.

    In other words, yeah, she really wants that deal. Kara Swisher who has covered Yahoo for years probably better than anyone else in the industry, liveblogged the earnings call, and commented, “Mayer appeared to practically salivate at the prospect if Apple throws over Google for someone else. Issue: Microsoft. Another issue: Yahoo search technology would have to be majorly upgraded.”

    In response to another question, Mayer went on to say more about Yahoo as a search partner in response to another question:

    Well certainly on search and across the board we pride ourselves on being the best partner in Silicon Valley. We work across the board with Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, we have different Samsung, we have different partnerships with all of these different providers and it’s not easy, they can’t look at each other but we work well with them.

    She said the reason they work so well is because of how flexible Yahoo is.

    In 2014, things started to get really interesting for Yahoo’s search business for the first time in a long time. 2015 may just shape up to be a major comeback year for the company on that front.

    Google is already showing concern about Yahoo’s place in Firefox. If Yahoo scores the Safari deal, it’s going to be a whole new ballgame.

    Google has been trying to get people to switch back with messages like this:

    And one on the Google homepage in the Firefox browser, which says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default engine.”

    Google also reported its earnings this week, and also discussed Yahoo’s deal with Mozilla a little. CFO Patrick Pichette said (via Seeking Alpha’s transcript):

    You’ve all heard the announcements about Mozilla. And so when we don’t comment on the details of any of our partnerships that we have, having said that, we continue to do two things that really matter. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

    And then the second piece is the way to win this in the long-term, right? It’s very simple. You just make wonderful products. And when you make wonderful products that are magical people will find them….partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

    Last week, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014, which looked at the impact of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” the report said. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” it added. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    According to that report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Do you think Google is in danger of losing any significant amount of market share? Do you think Apple will drop Google? Would it go with Yahoo? Tell us what you think.

    Note: This article has been updated from a previous version to include additional information.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Report Looks At Yahoo Firefox Deal’s Impact On Paid Search

    In November, Yahoo and Mozilla announced a new partnership, which would make Yahoo the default search experience in the Firefox browser beginning with version 34, which was released in early December.

    On Thursday, Merkle | RKG released its Digital Marketing Report for Q4 2014 (download page) looking at performance data and trends for Google, Yahoo, and Bing. It looks at a variety of aspects of search, but a section in the middle deals specifically with the effects of the Yahoo/Mozilla deal on paid search.

    “We’re now able to assess the impact of the deal on Yahoo’s share of Firefox paid search traffic, which grew from 12% at the beginning of December to 30% by the end of the year,” it says. “However, digging deeper reveals that Yahoo’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks has been in decline ever since the first big wave of updates in the second week of December. While the initial rollout saw Yahoo’s share rise to a peak of 43% on December 10th, that figure was just 36% by December’s end.”

    “This is primarily the result of users switching the default search engine of their browsers back to Google, as shown by the corresponding increase in Google’s share of Firefox 34 paid clicks throughout the month of December,” the report says. “All in all, it appears the deal will move about 2% or less of total paid search traffic from Google to Yahoo. This is far less than the 10%+ of paid traffic that stands to be on the table if Safari default search were to change hands, which news outlets have reported is a possibility in 2015.”

    Google has been showing concern about users sticking with Yahoo. It’s been showing Firefox users who visit its homepage a message saying, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default search engine.”

    On Wednesday, the company tweeted:

    According to the Merkle | RKG report, Bing and Yahoo outpaced Google in paid search growth, not only because of the Yahoo Firefox deal, but also rapid growth from Bing Product Ads.

    Images via Merkle | RKG, Google

  • Google Shows Concern Over Firefox Switch To Yahoo

    As you may know, Yahoo recently became the default search engine in Mozilla’s Firefox browser after Google had held the spot for a decade. As Yahoo’s search market share has already benefited from the switch, Google is telling Firefox users to switch back.

    On Wednesday, Google tweeted this helpful little video demonstrating how to change the default search experience, in case users who care enough about Google to follow the company on Twitter couldn’t figure out how to do that.

    Danny Sullivan points out that Google is now telling Firefox users who visit its homepage to set the default experience back to Google as well. It displays a message that says, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default search engine.”

    Yahoo itself has been telling visitors to its homepage to “upgrade” to the new Firefox:

    A couple weeks ago, StatCounter released some data on search market share in the U.S. finding that Yahoo saw its highest amount of that in over five years in December, thanks to its new Mozilla partnership.

    “The move by Mozilla has had a definite impact on US search,” said StatCounter CEO Aodhan Cullen. “The question now is whether Firefox users switch back to Google.”

    It will be interesting to see January’s data. Google is obviously worried enough about it to tweet out explanations on how to switch back.

    This week, comScore also put out its monthly look at U.S. desktop search engine rankings for December. From that:

    Google Sites led the U.S. explicit core search market in December with 65.4 percent market share, followed by Microsoft Sites with 19.7 percent (up 0.1 percentage points) and Yahoo Sites with 11.8 percent (up 1.6 percentage points). Ask Network accounted for 2 percent of explicit core searches, followed by AOL, Inc. with 1.2 percent.

    18.7 billion explicit core searches were conducted in December, with Google Sites ranking first with 12.2 billion (up 2 percent). Microsoft Sites ranked second with 3.7 billion searches (up 5 percent), followed by Yahoo Sites with 2.2 billion (up 21 percent), Ask Network with 372 million (up 5 percent) and AOL, Inc. with 222 million.

    As its share rises, Yahoo is also testing out a search results page layout that more closely resembles Google’s:

    You’d have to think a similar look and feel to Google could keep some used to the Google experience from Firefox from bothering to switch back compared to a more drastic change such as Yahoo’s current layout.

    Apparently Bing’s actually testing a similar look as well.

    This might not be a good time for Google to be losing any search market share, considering that analysts have already grown concerned by slowing growth in its core ad business.

    Images via Mozilla, Google, Yahoo, StatCounter, comScore

  • Firefox 35 Features Improved Video Chat With Firefox Hello

    Mozilla just launched Firefox 35, which includes improvements to its video chat offering. Firefox Hello was first introduced in testing in October. New functionality has been added to make it available for primetime in Firefox 35.

    Mozila is dubbing it “a simpler way to communicate”. It lets you make video calls to anyone using a WebRTC-enabled browser (like Firefox, Chrome, or Opera). It’s free, and you don’t have to sign up for an account to use it. Plus it’s built directly into the actual browser.

    Firefox Hello

    “Before Firefox Hello, making a video call meant giving up your email address and possibly more personal information as well as downloading software before you could start the conversation,” Mozilla says. “Now we’re making it even easier to say ‘hello’ by eliminating some of the call steps and allowing you to save and name your favorite conversations, so you can drop into them as soon as you click a link.”

    It utilizes a new rooms-based conversations model. To use it, just find the Hello icon in the menu bar or customization panel, and click “Start a conversation”. A window will open showing a self-view until the person you invited clicks on the link and joins the room. You should get an audio notification, and the Hello icon turns blue.

    Conversations have unique URLs. You can create multiple conversations and name them, so you can return to them later without having to start new ones with new links.

    “For those of you who want to contact someone directly, you just need to make sure both parties have Firefox Accounts,” Mozilla says. “If your contacts have a Firefox Account and are online, then you can call these contacts directly from Firefox. You can sign into your Firefox Account on every computer you use, so you can be reached at home or at work. If you have a Google account, you can easily import your contacts to your Hello address book. Simply select ‘Import Contacts’ from the address book and then sign into your Google account to give permission.”

    Firefox Hello was developed in partnership with Telefónica, and uses ToxBox technology. Mozilla says it will be testing features like screen sharing and online collaboration.

    Image via Mozilla

  • Yahoo Up, Google Down After Firefox Switch

    Yahoo Up, Google Down After Firefox Switch

    Well, it looks like that deal Yahoo struck with Mozilla is making a pretty significant difference in the U.S. search market. Obviously Google is still dominating by a very wide margin, but since the deal went into effect, Yahoo has reached its highest share of that market since 2009, while Google is down.

    Do you think this will turn into a more meaningful change in the search market? Will Yahoo continue to gain some of its share back or do you expect this to just be a small blip? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    This information comes from StatCounter, which says Google is at its lowest U.S. share since its been recording the data. The data is based on over 15 billion page views per month to over three million websites.

    Late last year, Mozilla’s long-time partnership with Google came to an end in the U.S. and in a handful of other countries. While Google has been the default search experience for a decade, obviously lending a great amount of queries to the search giant, that honor now goes to Yahoo in the U.S., Yandex in Russia, and Baidu in China. Google remains the default experience in other countries, but some of these could eventually change too.

    “This is the most significant long-term partnership for Yahoo in five years,” a spokesperson for Yahoo told WebProNews in November, adding that the company would also be introducing an enhanced search experience for Firefox users, before launching it to others.

    “In evaluating our search partnerships, our primary consideration was to ensure our strategy aligned with our values of choice and independence, and positions us to innovate and advance our mission in ways that best serve our users and the Web,” said Mozilla CEO Chris Beard. “In the end, each of the partnership options available to us had strong, improved economic terms reflecting the significant value that Firefox brings to the ecosystem.”

    Not only did Firefox switch default search engines in some countries, it added more options as well. In all, Firefox now has 61 different search providers pre-installed across 88 different language versions.

    Shortly after the latest version of Firefox (34) became available, StatCounter shared data suggesting a quick 3x jump in Firefox searches with Yahoo.

    Apparently things have been going pretty well with the partnership since then. Last month, Yahoo achieved its highest U.S. search share in over five years. Here’s how the share looked between November and December.

    It could actually be Bing, who is at risk of losing its ranking in terms of market share.

    “The move by Mozilla has had a definite impact on US search,” said StatCounter CEO Aodhan Cullen. “The question now is whether Firefox users switch back to Google.”

    According to the company, Firefox users represented just over 12% of US internet usage in December. Yahoo is doing its part to bump that number up. Since the integration went into effect, Yahoo has been telling users on its homepage to upgrade to the new Firefox, regardless of what browser they’re using. Even Chrome users, for example, see the message.

    It’s never been clearer how smart of a move it was on Google’s part to build Chrome and make it arguably the best browser the web has to offer. It’s also clear that it remains in the best interest of Google’s business at large that Chrome remains the market leader. Purely from a search standpoint, it means it can keep a default Google experience for more users without worrying about expiring partnerships and changes of heart from partners.

    Apple is another long-time partner who has been inching further and further away from Google. Apple’s deal with Google, which sees Google as the default experience on Safari, expires this year, and both Yahoo and Microsoft are reportedly eager to step in as a replacement. It remains to be seen if Google will lose another major browser partnership. If Apple elects to go a different route, we can probably expect the company to make some significant improvements to Safari to help it better compete with Chrome.

    In other Yahoo Search news, the Yahoo Directory, which basically put the company on the map, and was the Google of its day, is officially dead. Meanwhile, the company has added search to its Aviate Android app, enabling users to search apps, contacts, and the web from their homescreen. Yahoo acquired Aviate about a year ago.

    Yahoo’s most recent earnings report revealed that its search advertising business is outperforming its display business. While it’s certainly making efforts to improve the display side of things, the Firefox deal should play a pretty significant role in boosting the search ad business even more.

    Do you think Yahoo can make a significant impact in the search market after all these years? Let us know in the comments.

    Images via StatCounter, Yahoo

  • Yahoo Tells Users To ‘Upgrade’ To Firefox

    As you may know, Yahoo recently secured a five-year deal with Mozilla to become the default search engine for the Firefox web browser in the U.S. This went into effect with the latest Firefox release, which was launched last week.

    Now, Yahoo is going so far as to tell users on its various web properties, including its popular homepage, to “upgrade to the new Firefox.” They’re not just telling Firefox users to upgrade to the new version. They’re telling other users, like those using Chrome, to “upgrade” to it.

    You’ll also see it at Yahoo Sports, Yahoo Finance, and elsewhere.

    Yahoo stands to gain a lot if it can get more people to opt for Firefox over Chrome, as it could put a bigger dent in Google’s share of the search market. An early report from StatCounter after the latest version of Firefox was release found that a lot more people started searching with Yahoo. In fact, Yahoo saw a 3x jump in Firefox searches right after the update.

    The firm found that Yahoo usage on Firefox 34 was 29.4% compared to 9.6% for Firefox 33. Google search usage by Firefox users dropped from 82.1% to 63.5% as they upgraded to the new version, it found, and Bing declined from 6.5% on Firefox 33 to 5.8% on Firefox 34.

    Even ahead of the Firefox deal, Yahoo’s search business was looking up. This should help add some momentum to that, and help the company’s search revenue even more.

    Via TechCrunch

    Image via Yahoo

  • Yahoo Sees 3x Jump In Firefox Searches With Browser Update

    As you may know, Yahoo recently entered a five-year partnership with Mozilla to see Yahoo Search become the default search experience in Firefox. This is a big deal in search because the browser has had Google in this spot for the past decade. It gives Yahoo a chance to gain some searches it wasn’t otherwise getting.

    The first version of Firefox – 34 – to utilize Yahoo as the default launched this week, and it appears to already be helping Yahoo significantly.

    StatCounter says on December 2nd in the US, Yahoo search was used three times more on Firefox 34 than on Firefox 33.

    The firm found that Yahoo usage on Firefox 34 was 29.4% compared to 9.6% for Firefox 33. Google search usage by Firefox users dropped from 82.1% to 63.5% as they upgraded to the new version, it found, and Bing declined from 6.5% on Firefox 33 to 5.8% on Firefox 34.

    While this is obviously a limited data set, this brings up a pretty interesting point in that Mozilla’s move to Yahoo could actually hurt Bing. In the past, users who simply didn’t want to use Google may have switched their search preference to Bing, whereas now, perhaps they’re more likely to just leave it at Yahoo.

    We’ll look forward to seeing an update on these numbers as users have had more time to update their browsers and their search preferences.

    “Firefox 34 is still being rolled out so its usage is currently quite low. It will be interesting to see how this develops,” said StatCounter CEO Aodhan Cullen. “At the moment the change is having a negligible impact on overall search share in the US, but if this early usage trend on Firefox 34 continues then Yahoo could be on course to gain a number of percentage points.”

    According to StatCounter, on December 2nd, overall search share across all browsers in the US was 78% for Google, 12.4% for Bing and 7.9% for Yahoo.

    In the meantime, it seems Yahoo and Bing are vying to replace Google as the default experience for Apple’s Safari browser, which should have a significant impact on market share for either. It remains to be seen whether or not Apple moves away from Google here, but if past moves by the company are any indication, it’s a very real possibility.

    Yahoo’s most recent earnings report illustrated that its search business has begun to perform better than its display ad business. It’s deals to become the search provider for third-party services that give engines like Yahoo and Bing the best chance to gain some market share against Google.

    Image via StatCounter

  • Mozilla Is Working On Firefox For iOS

    Mozilla Is Working On Firefox For iOS

    A lot of things seem to be changing in Firefox Land since CEO Chris Beard took over this year. Recently, Mozilla announced a five-year partnership with Yahoo, which sees the search engine replacing Google as the default search experience in the Firefox web browser in the U.S.

    That alone was a huge move as it had been with Google for a decade. It has also added advertising to the browser experience, and launched some new privacy-related features and a developer-specific version of its browser.

    Another thing on Mozilla’s list is apparently getting iOS users to use the browser. While Firefox has been available for Android for years now, Mozilla has historically indicated that it wouldn’t be making the browser available for iOS. The problem has been that Mozilla can’t use its rendering engine on iOS as Apple requires browsers to use the WebKit engine that’s employed by Safari and Chrome.

    Under the new management, however, things may soon change. Mozilla executives indicated they want to get the browser on Apple’s popular operating system. After that sparked some interest in the blogosphere, Mozilla posted this statement to its blog:

    At Mozilla, we put our users first and want to provide an independent choice for them on any platform. We are in the early stages of experimenting with something that allows iOS users to be able to choose a Firefox-like experience.

    We work in the open at Mozilla and are just starting to experiment, so we’ll update you when we have more to share.

    That’s certainly a good start as far as Firefox fans are concerned. Unfortunately, Mozilla is pretty late to the game on this one, and will have to overcome longtime iOS users’ habits of using browsers like Safari and Chrome.

    Image via Joshua Wolford

  • Firefox Adds To Its New Search Efforts

    Firefox Adds To Its New Search Efforts

    Mozilla really wants to give you more non-Google ways of finding things. As you may know, it recently announced that it has entered into a five-year agreement with Yahoo, which will see the search engine become the default experience for the Firefox browser in the U.S. Mozilla has also secured Yandex and Baidu as the default search engines for Firefox in Russia and China respectively.

    When Mozilla announced all of this, it also mentioned that all in all, Firefox has 61 search providers across 88 different languages pre-installed. In the U.S., it will continue to have Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, eBay, Amazon, Twitter and Wikipedia in that mix.

    On Wednesday, Mozilla made another search announcement aimed at helping users search for things using the different engines more quickly.

    “How often have you done a web search, already knowing that you would click the first result that looked like a Wikipedia page?” asks Mozilla’s Philipp Sackl. “Quite often? Then Firefox is about to make your life easier. With the new one click searches, you can instantly find what you are looking for across the web.”

    “When typing a search term into the Firefox search box, you will notice two new things,” he explains. “First, we improved the design of search suggestions to make them look a lot more organized. And second: there is an array of buttons below your search suggestions. These buttons allow you to find your search term directly on a specific site quickly and easily.”

    You’ll be able to add additional search engines, as well as show and hide the ones that are included in the feature.

    Image via Mozilla

  • Yahoo Takes Major Search Partner Away From Google

    Yahoo may have lost its way in search over the years, but it would appear that CEO Marissa Mayer is determined to bring search back to the forefront. Going to head with her former employer in its specialty may not be an easy feat, but she’s doing everything she can, it would seem, to cement Yahoo’s brand back into search relevance. Keep in mind, Yahoo was the king of search at one point, and a lot of people are frustrated with Google for various reasons (look no further than the comment sections on our Google search articles for proof of that).

    Can Yahoo make a significant comeback in search? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Yahoo and Mozilla announced a strategic five-year partnership making Yahoo Search the default search engine for Firefox in the United States both on mobile and desktop.

    “This is the most significant long-term partnership for Yahoo in five years,” a spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews. “As part of this, Yahoo will introduce an enhanced search experience, which U.S. Firefox users will receive first in December 2014.”

    This is huge news for both parties as well as for search in general. Google has been the global default search experience in Firefox for the past ten years. While Chrome has emerged in the meantime, Firefox remains a popular browser, and should give Yahoo a significant boost in searches.

    Here’s what the desktop web browser market share looked like last month (via Wikipedia):

    The Mozilla Google deal came up for renewal this year, and Mozilla decided to review its competitive strategy and explore its options.

    “In evaluating our search partnerships, our primary consideration was to ensure our strategy aligned with our values of choice and independence, and positions us to innovate and advance our mission in ways that best serve our users and the Web,” said CEO Chris Beard. “In the end, each of the partnership options available to us had strong, improved economic terms reflecting the significant value that Firefox brings to the ecosystem. But one strategy stood out from the rest.”

    Firefox will on longer have a single global default search provider. Mozilla says it’s adopting a “more local and flexible” approach with different partnerships for different countries. While Yahoo is the U.S. partner, it’s Yandex in Russia and Baidu in China. In all, Firefox will have 61 different search providers pre-installed across 88 different language versions. Google will still be among those options, and it will continue to power Safe Browsing and Geolocation features in Firefox. Google will also remain the default in Europe.

    That could change, however, and given that Mozilla and Yahoo are now buddies, you have to wonder if Yahoo will eventually take the reins there too.

    Mayer said, “We’re thrilled to partner with Mozilla. Mozilla is an inspirational industry leader who puts users first and focuses on building forward-leaning, compelling experiences. We’re so proud that they’ve chosen us as their long-term partner in search, and I can’t wait to see what innovations we build together. Yahoo, we believe deeply in search – it’s an area of investment, opportunity and growth for us. This partnership helps to expand our reach in search and also gives us an opportunity to work closely with Mozilla to find ways to innovate more broadly in search, communications, and digital content.”

    “Our teams worked closely with Mozilla to build a clean, modern, and immersive search experience that will launch first to Firefox’s U.S. users in December and then to all Yahoo users in early 2015. The interactive and integrated experience also better leverages our world-class content and personalization technologies,” she said. “Search inspires us because we think it’s something that will change and improve dramatically, and because fundamentally, search is about human curiosity — and that is something that will never be finished.”

    “Search is a core part of the online experience for everyone, with Firefox users alone searching the Web more than 100 billion times per year globally,” said Beard. “Our new search strategy doubles down on our commitment to make Firefox a browser for everyone, with more choice and opportunity for innovation. We are excited to partner with Yahoo to bring a new, re-imagined Yahoo search experience to Firefox users in the U.S. featuring the best of the Web, and to explore new innovative search and content experiences together.”

    In recent years, Yahoo has become known more for its display advertising business than its search business, but in its most recent earnings report, it actually revealed that it’s doing better in search. The company saw its eleventh quarter of year-over-year search revenue growth with price-per-click up in most regions.

    “We continue to find ways to enhance the performance of our search ads through better user interfaces and higher quality traffic and as advertisers ultimately find our search ads more valuable,” Mayer said at the time.

    She also talked a little about search on the conference call that followed the earnings release. She said, “When we think about what will search look like, on a phone, on a smaller device 10 years from now, we think it looks pretty different then it looks today. We really like the Aviate technology that we acquired we’ve been looking at how can really enrich the experience such that its not a lot of different answers perfectly ranked but actually the one answer you need when you’re on the go, or you’re working in a more constrained display, real constrained screening environment.”

    More on the Aviate acquisition here.

    As you probably know, Yahoo made a deal with Microsoft in the pre-Mayer years, which saw Bing powering Yahoo search, but it’s become increasingly clear that Mayer isn’t a big fan of the deal, and it will likely end eventually. Having a partnership with Mozilla will help it better compete with both Google and Microsoft, which of course uses Bing for its Internet Explorer browser.

    Interestingly enough, it sounds like Bing doesn’t think it will really ever be able to take significant market share away from Google when it comes to core search.

    For what it’s worth, the Yahoo/Bing partnership saw its biggest paid search market share increase in five years in Q3.

    As far as Firefox goes, Mozilla is doing plenty to keep its flagship product relevant, which will only help Yahoo in the United States. It recently announced some major privacy-related initiatives, and that’s something that’s been on a lot of people’s minds, particularly since the whole NSA/PRISM scandal came to light. By the way, under the partnership, Mozilla says Yahoo will support Do Not Track in Firefox.

    Mozilla is also courting developers with a new Developer Edition of Firefox.

    As of this summer, Mozilla is under new leadership as Beard became CEO, though he’s been “deeply involved with every aspect of Mozilla” since 2004.

    Google’s dominance has been helped by partnerships like the ones it has held with Google and Apple over the years, but those are starting to break down. Apple has also been distancing itself from Google reliance in a variety of ways over the past couple years.

    Google is too big at this point to face any major threat, but losing such significant partnerships has to hurt it to some extent. And if you’ll recall, when Google released its latest earnings report, one of the storylines was whether or not Google’s core business is actually in trouble. Some analysts seem to think it might be as growth has slowed. Google has also seen twelve straight quarters of ad price decline.

    In case you haven’t noticed, Yahoo has been making a lot of acquisitions over the past couple years, and has been launching major overhauls to its core products while getting rid of others so it can focus on the ones that really matter. It’s hard to argue that Mayer hasn’t breathed new life into the company since she took over.

    Yahoo doesn’t have to become top dog in search again to have a major impact on the web and businesses. Either way, for the first time in a long time, it would seem that Yahoo has plenty to be excited about when it comes to search.

    Do you use Firefox? Yahoo Search? Do you you think Yahoo is headed in the right direction? Discuss.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Mozilla’s New Browser Ads Make Their Debut

    Mozilla announced in February that it would sell ad space in its popular Firefox browser through “Directory Tiles,” which would replace the nine blank tiles on the tab page with “pre-packaged content” for first time users.

    “Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for first-time users,” explained Mozilla’s VP of Content Services, Darren Herman at the time. “Some of these tile placements will be from the Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic location, and some will be sponsored content from hand-picked partners to help support Mozilla’s pursuit of our mission. The sponsored tiles will be clearly labeled as such, while still leading to content we think users will enjoy.”

    On Thursday, Mozilla and Mindshare North America announced a partnership, which will see the agency network provide its clients with access to these ad spot in the browser. The first client to go live is CVS Health.

    “We believe there is a huge gap in the marketplace around user participation in advertising: it’s non-existent at scale. We believe users will trust advertising if it’s transparent and they have control of their experience,” said Herman. “We built our own solution to show the world that putting the user first is possible and we will partner with different technology companies over the coming months to extend our principles beyond Firefox.”

    “We are excited for CVS Health to be one of the first launch partners with Mozilla’s new content initiative. We are always looking for ways to be innovative, break through the clutter, and bring first-to-market opportunities to our brands,” said Marisa Skolnick, Associate Director, Mindshare North America. “Mozilla has given us that opportunity and allowed us to help ideate and take a first look into future concepts.”

    GroupM, which is Mindshare’s parent company, will work with Mozilla to refine new ad products, and will provide “product advisory” through next year.

    Image via PR Newswire

  • Mozilla Puts Greater Emphasis On Privacy In Firefox

    Mozilla is celebrating ten years of Firefox with a handful of announcements. We told you about the launch of Firefox Developer Edition, which it had previously teased, but that’s only part of the celebration.

    The regular Firefox browser is getting a Forget button to keep browsing history private on shared computers or protect users from visits to suspicious sites.

    Mozilla commissioned a survey from Harris Poll, which found that men are three times more likely to have visited an adult website and “wish they could forget it.” Men are also twice as likely than females to have visited an online dating site while already in a relationship (and again, wish they could “forget” it).

    Over half of young adults (19 – 34) have done something online they’d like to forget, while one in three women want to “forget an online shopping binge,” the survey finds. Men are more likely than women to clear their online browsing history daily.

    Firefox is also adding DuckDuckGo, a search engine that doesn’t collect or store search info, as a search option across Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android.

    Finally, Mozilla announced a new strategic initiative called Polaris to “bring together the best and brightest to explore new approaches to enhance privacy controls online.”

    A spokesperson said in an email, “Polaris will bring together Mozilla’s global community with industry experts from the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) and the Tor Project, and others, with an open call for participation. Initially, Mozilla is exploring an experimental tracking protection tool and working closely with Tor to test and strengthen their network.”

    More on Mozilla’s new announcements here.

    Image via Joshua Wolford

  • Mozilla Launches Firefox Developer Edition

    Earlier this month, Mozilla teased an upcoming version of Firefox specifically for developers. It’s now released Firefox Developer Edition.

    The browser replaces the Aurora channel in the Firefox Release process, and features will land in Developer Edition every six weeks, just like Aurora. This is after they have stabilized in Nightly builds.

    Developer Edition gives developers access to tools and platform features at least twelve weeks before they reach the main Firefox release channel. It will also include experimental tools.

    “For example, the Developer Edition includes the Firefox Tools Adapter, which enables you to connect the Firefox developer tools to other browsers such as Chrome on Android and Safari on iOS,” Mozilla says.

    The browser uses a separate profile from other versions installed on your computer so you can run the alongside one another. Default preference values are tailored for web developers. Chrome and remote debugging are enabled by default, for example.

    You can download and learn more about Firefox Developer Edition here.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google Discovers ‘POODLE’ Vulnerability In SSL 3.0

    Google announced that it has discovered a vulnerability (referred to as POODLE) in SSL version 3.0, the details of which can be found here. Bodo Möller of the Google Security Team found the issue along with fellow Googlers Thai Duong and Krzysztof Kotowicz. Makers of web browsers, including Google, are working on a fix.

    Möller writes:

    SSL 3.0 is nearly 15 years old, but support for it remains widespread. Most importantly, nearly all browsers support it and, in order to work around bugs in HTTPS servers, browsers will retry failed connections with older protocol versions, including SSL 3.0. Because a network attacker can cause connection failures, they can trigger the use of SSL 3.0 and then exploit this issue.

    Disabling SSL 3.0 support, or CBC-mode ciphers with SSL 3.0, is sufficient to mitigate this issue, but presents significant compatibility problems, even today. Therefore our recommended response is to support TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV. This is a mechanism that solves the problems caused by retrying failed connections and thus prevents attackers from inducing browsers to use SSL 3.0. It also prevents downgrades from TLS 1.2 to 1.1 or 1.0 and so may help prevent future attacks.

    Möller also notes that Chrome has supported TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV since February, and says it has “good evidence” that it can be used without compatibility issues. Chrome will also begin testing changes that disable the fallback to SSL 3.0. Some sites will break because of this, Google notes, adding that such sites will need to be updated quickly.

    Google hopes to have support for SSL 3.0 removed from its client products within the coming months.

    Mozillla says it has a plan for Firefox as well. SSL 3.0 will be disabled by default in Firefox 34, which will be released on November 25th. It’s releasing the code to disable it in Nightly immediately, and that will be promoted to Aurora and Beta in the coming weeks.

    Additionally Firefox 35 will support SCSV, which is described as a generic TLS downgrade protection mechanism. Mozilla says:

    For Firefox users, the simplest way to stay safe is to ensure that Firefox is configured to automatically update. Look under Preferences / Advanced / Update and make sure that “Automatically install updates” is checked.

    For users who don’t want to wait till November 25th (when SSLv3 is disabled by default in Firefox 34), we have created the SSL Version Control Firefox extension to disable SSLv3 immediately.

    Microsoft had this to say:

    Microsoft is aware of detailed information that has been published describing a new method to exploit a vulnerability in SSL 3.0. This is an industry-wide vulnerability affecting the SSL 3.0 protocol itself and is not specific to the Windows operating system. All supported versions of Microsoft Windows implement this protocol and are affected by this vulnerability. Microsoft is not aware of attacks that try to use the reported vulnerability at this time. Considering the attack scenario, this vulnerability is not considered high risk to customers.

    We are actively working with partners in our Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP) to provide information that they can use to provide broader protections to customers.

    Upon completion of this investigation, Microsoft will take the appropriate action to help protect our customers. This may include providing a security update through our monthly release process or providing an out-of-cycle security update, depending on customer needs.

    The company has further guidance, an FAQ, and a list of affected products available here.

    By the way, POODLE stands for “Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption”. This article at ImperialViolet.org has more technical information explaining it.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Firefox For Android Gets Chromecast, Roku Support

    Firefox For Android Gets Chromecast, Roku Support

    Mozilla announced that Firefox for Android will now let users send supported videos to their televisions via Roku and Chromecast.

    In a blog post, the company explains:

    You might be entertaining friends and want to share a clip from your recent vacation or a news video from sites like CNN.com. Whatever the reason, sending videos to your TV has never been easier. All you need to do is find and start to play a video in Firefox for Android. You’ll then see the ‘send to device’ icon in the video playback controls and the URL bar. Tap on the icon for a list of connected Roku or Chromecast device(s) that are on the same WiFi network. Simply select the device you want to send your video to.

    You can choose the content you want to view in your living room and can play, pause and close videos directly from the Media Control Bar in Firefox for Android. This appears at the bottom of the screen on your Android phone when a video is being sent and stays visible as long as the video is playing, even if you change tabs or visit new Web pages.

    Of course the Chromecast app itself lets you mirror your Android device’s screen (at least for the growing list of supported devices), and more and more apps (including Chrome) enable casting on their own.

    The addition of Roku support is the standout feature with Mozilla’s offering. While it doesn’t offer any specific plans, the functionality would seem to suggest that Firefox could add support for additional streaming devices.

    Image via YouTube

  • Mozilla Shows Off ‘Most Customizable Firefox Ever’

    Mozilla announced the launch of Firefox 29, which it calls its most customizable Firefox ever.

    It includes a new design, a customization mode, a new Firefox menu, new bookmarks, a new add-on manager, and enhanced sync powered by Firefox Accounts.

    “The first thing you’ll notice in Firefox is the beautiful new design that makes it easy to focus on your Web content,” says Mozilla. “The tabs are sleek and smooth to help you navigate the Web faster. It’s easy to see what tab you’re currently visiting and the other tabs fade into the background to be less of a distraction when you’re not using them.”

    “The Firefox menu has moved to the right corner of the toolbar and puts all your browser controls in one place,” it says. “The menu includes a ‘Customize’ tool that transforms Firefox into a powerful customization mode where you can add or move any feature, service or add-on. This level of Firefox customization puts you in control of your Web experience and is unmatched by any other browser.”

    The new Firefox Sync gives users access to the Awesome Bar browsing history, as well as saved passwords, bookmarks, open tabs, and form data across computers and Android devices.

    Mozilla also lists supported web platform and developer tools including WebRTC, WebAPIs, asm.js and Emscripten, Web Audeio API, CSS Flexbox, App Manager, and Extension APIs.

    Image via YouTube