WebProNews

Tag: Facebook IPO

  • Facebook IPO Pushes Investors off the Stock Market

    Sometimes something is just a bad investment, and as time goes on, the shares you purchased in the company just lose more and more value. At other times, as with the Facebook IPO, it is clear that you were swindled.

    When a big bank like Morgan Stanley suppresses a valuable forecast which they know would certainly stall trading if introduced on the eve of the IPO, then selectively informs other big banks and investors, then it is what’s know as a “screw job”, a term made popular by one of my college investments instructors. “Screw job”, refers to one getting f*%#ed over by someone offering a junk investment.

    Imagine yourself as a Facebook investor, or maybe you are, this thing has to have you pretty upset. Now, that’s is not to say that the stock is worthless. Many experts still believe Facebook shares will perform over time. The larger point here for individual investors is that every time big banks promote a stock as, “the next big thing”, it turns out to be a gimmick to generate some revenue off the general public’s uninformed position in the trading game.

    Many people are fed up and experts are warning that this will be the last straw for many small investors. Wall Street, in their minds, represents a losing game. A game rigged for big banks and large investment firms to make money, while smaller investors and outsiders are left holding the bag. The bag of, you know what.

    Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago attorney who represents retail investors comments on the sentiments of his clients:

    “This is clearly the latest in a long string of events that is eviscerating the confidence investors have in the market,”

    “The perception is Wall Street jiggered this IPO so the underwriters made money, Facebook executives made money and the small investor got left holding the bag.”

    Steve Sosnick, an equity risk manager for Timber Hill LLC, also comments on the frustration of retail investors:

    “If you have a lot of angry people out there, they’re going to express their anger in different ways,”

    “One of them may be with their feet.”

    As you know, some investors have already decided to seek retribution in court, and have filed lawsuits in New York, California, and soon, almost inevitably, in Massachusetts.

    We also learned that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is closely examining what they refer to as “issues” with the IPO. Mary Schapiro, chairman of the SEC commented to the press at a recent Senate Banking Committee hearing.

    Schapiro comments:

    “I think there is a lot of reason to have confidence in our markets and in the integrity of how they operate, but there are issues that we need to look at specifically with respect to Facebook,”

    To add to the fun, federal regulators are looking into the Nasdaq computer glitch and going through last Friday’s Facebook trades with a fine-toothed comb searching for any evidence of non-sense on Nasdaq’s end. Combine this with Facebook’s less than stellar trading prices on the stock market this week, and you can see why some people are calling this the worst IPO of the decade.

    According to some, $14 is a better price for shares offered in the Facebook IPO, but right now trades are still plugging along at almost $32, so I would say they’re still doing okay despite all the controversy. We’ll keep you posted as the Facebook IPO and big bank scandal continues to unfold.

  • Fidelity has Confirmed their Client’s Facebook Trades

    If you haven’t heard about Facebook’s disastrous IPO debut, I welcome you out of your cave and am happy to give you an update. Essentially, the Nasdaq stock market delayed the 11AM start by as much as thirty minutes while they worked out a computer glitch that left big bank trading desks blind as to who bought what, and at what price.

    Shortly after that, stock prices surged to about $45, but then quickly returned to their $38 target price and stayed there until close at 4PM. Starting monday, shares took the gradual path down to the low $30 range, and have now stabilized at about $32 per share. Unfortunately for Facebook, it has also come to light that Morgan Stanley, one of the IPO’s largest underwriters, concealed a critical financial forecast just before the launch of the IPO.

    Now that investors and the Securities and Exchange Commission has gotten word of the concealed documents, Facebook and its underwriters have been hit with a slew of lawsuits and formal inquiries regarding the event. Also, the Nasdaq and federal regulators have been busy sorting through the trades from Friday trying to nail-down the particulars of each deal and working to ensure everyone received their shares and at a fair price.

    Yesterday, Morgan Stanley announced that they will be working to get their customers the best prices on the shares they purchased during the IPO launch. And today, Fidelity investment and brokerage firm announced they have already accounted for all the shares their clients purchased last Friday, but are still working with the Nasdaq and federal regulators to resolve any further issues.

    According to Reuters, the Nasdaq had all orders, completed or not, back to member firms before 2PM last Friday. Fidelity issued their own notice for clients explaining, “we realize that some customers still have questions about how these delays may have affected their trading activity”, and “we understand that Nasdaq is working with federal regulators to determine what, if any, accommodation might be made. However, customers should assume that any shares of Facebook stock currently credited to their accounts are owned by them and available for trading”.

    To reassure customers of Fidelity that they will get the best possible outcomes from the situation the notice further exclaimed, “we will continue to work with the industry to get NASDAQ to come to a resolution that addresses the concerns of our customers”. So at least Fidelity is on top of ensuring their end of the bargain was properly upheld. Hopefully we can expect the same from all the banks involved.

    We will keep you updated on the current happenings with the Facebook IPO and the Morgan Stanley concealed documents scandal. Check back with Webpronews for regular updates.

  • comScore Submits Latest Top 50 Websites

    comScore’s latest report on the top web properties in the U.S., based on data from its Media Metrix service, puts Google Sites on top for the month of April, 2012:

    comscore rankings

    Microsoft and Yahoo! are almost tied for the #2 spot, while Facebook, AOL and Amazon round out the top six. comScore reports that general web traffic regarding news sites was up in April, and also noted that sites relating to beauty and style had also gained popularity. Jeff Hackett, executive VP of comScore states, “The general news category reached an all-time high in April, reaching 5 out of 6 U.S. internet users during the month.”

    General news sites were up 12% in April at 183 million hits, and Yahoo! News came in at #1, with 89.1 million viewers. HPMG came in second, and CNN came in third, with 59.4 and 57.4 million hits respectively.

    As for the top 50 ad focus ranking, Google Ad Network saw 204 million unique visitors, with a 92.2% reach, taking the top spot. Interestingly, Facebook came in at #16, with 158 million visitors, reaching 71.6%

    comscore rankings

    During the aftermath of Facebook’s IPO ordeal, investors have been weary of Facebook’s inability to monetize its ad content, especially for mobile, the mode of which more and more users are adopting to access the site. Still, Facebook’s April ad focus ranking isn’t so bad realistically – Sure, Google’s Ad Network blows it out of the water, but Zuckerberg and Co. still compete with the likes of Yahoo! Sites, and Microsoft. Though, these rankings don’t really define actual results – GM recently pulled its ad campaign from the social network, and on a much smaller level, a New Orleans pizza joint getting its start was unable to sell even one pizza using Facebook ads.

  • Tech Stocks: Facebook Debacle Makes Investors Wary

    Tech stocks are on a decidedly downward spiral after the Facebook IPO mutated from a highly-anticipated event into a throbbing headache for investors. As a result, tech stocks, initial public offerings in particular, will most likely be given a wide berth by those who are waiting for the things to cool down after last Friday’s disaster.

    In case you’ve been unplugged for past week or so, here’s a handy recap of what’s going on: Following the problematic Facebook IPO seven days ago, reports started circulating that Morgan Stanley, the firm who handled the aforementioned company’s underwriting, cut forecasts before the shares went on sale. Unfortunately, only major investors were made aware of the alteration, leaving the rest of the country in the dark.

    Scott Sweet, senior managing partner of the IPO Boutique, shared his thoughts on the subject with MarketWatch. “I think it will freeze the IPO market until there is some stability and some answers as to what went wrong with Facebook. IPOs, as you know, are inherently risky by nature, and here we had the ‘found money’ blow up.”

    Morgan Stanley, of course, claims they were in “compliance with all applicable regulations”. However, that won’t stop the investigation that’s underway, which may ultimately alter the landscape of IPOs as we currently know it. Additionally, Nasdaq is facing scrutiny after delaying the sale for nearly 30 minutes on Friday.

    Facebook shares were up to 3% on Wednesday, though they’re still down 15% from their IPO price.

  • Facebook Adds New Analytics Tool for Brands

    Facebook stock, as of now, sits at $33.03, and some speculate that there truly is no limit on how low it can go. One of several factors that might’ve contributed to the sensational IPO’s less than stellar performance is a possible fear regarding the company’s future, especially since the mobile version of the site, which more and more users are accessing, offers even less ad content than the desktop version. Some have even speculated that Facebook was aware of this, and may have issued a reduced earnings guidance on the eve of its IPO, which is a company’s forecast of how good business will be in the future. Either way, Facebook stock has essentially tanked, and the social network is scrambling to figure out how to make more money from ads, especially after GM discontinuing their campaign with the company, which made headlines.

    Yesterday, the social network made a change which allowed advertisers to bypass Facebook sales reps while purchasing ads – Facebook home page and news feed ad space can directly be set up through Ads API and Power Editor tools, without having to consult with a Facebook ad representative. The platform continues to roll out new features related to ad content sans any official announcements, most recently adding a tab that displays the percentage of brand page fans who were reached as well as ‘liked’ posts. Here are some screen grabs of these new feature:

    fb ads

    fb ads

    Page owners now have an extra analytical tool to get a better handle on how well their brand is doing on the social network. Facebook told Mashable that the new feature is available for the old-style pages, as well as the newer timelines, but adds that “we are slowly rolling this back to Page owners with a slightly updated design.” It can be assumed that the “updated design” is the timeline, which seems to be slowly be taking over the entire site.

  • Facebook Making Ad Purchases Easier

    Facebook stock closed at $31.99 per share yesterday, and some speculate that there truly is no limit on how low it can go. One of several factors that might’ve contributed to the sensational IPO’s less than stellar performance is a possible fear regarding the company’s future, especially since the mobile version of the site, which more and more users are accessing, offers even less ad content than the desktop version. Some have even speculated that Facebook was aware of this, and may have issued a reduced earnings guidance on the eve of its IPO, which is a company’s forecast of how good business will be in the future. Either way, Facebook stock has essentially tanked, and the social network is scrambling to figure out how to make more money from ads.

    The most recent change is the ability to buy Facebook home page and news feed ad space directly through Ads API and Power Editor tools, without having to consult with a Facebook ad representative. Here is a graphic courtesy of AllFacebook that describes the placement offerings users can now adjust on their own:

    facebook ads

    Still, advertisers will need to go through ad reps to buy logout placements and for Reach Generator services. And, the changes don’t apply to mobile – which seems to have been a main point. Though, the changes will likely make an impact in ad sales – time will tell how significant.

    In related news, billionaire investor and general life-coach Mark Cuban points at that, realistically, mobile isn’t going to be the end of Facebook, and people need to chill.

  • Mark Cuban Informs You About Facebook

    Mark Cuban, financial guru, is known for his candid and sometimes contradictory financial (or life) advice. Typically I enjoy his commentary because he likes to cut right to the core of a topic and clear the air of the convoluted bullshit that sometimes surrounds financial arguments. In this case, he swats down some non-sense about what plagued the Facebook IPO and why it isn’t performing at the level some expected.

    It comes to us in five chunks of information he blasted out on his blog site yesterday. I’ll try to summarize as best I can, but you can also follow the link to his post. To begin with, he explains why the individual investors on Wall Street are going to be getting the shaft from now on. Essentially he wants us to understand that big investors and banks are just using disinformation to screw us out of our hard-earned dollars. I think gets the nail right on the head with that, but it’s definitely nothing new.

    Second, he warns about the activity on secondary trading markets and how they can mess with the values company’s are placing on themselves. I’ll let him explain that a little further. Here’s a segment from the post:

    “Can you imagine how pissed you would be if you bought a boatload of Facebook thinking you got in at a better than IPO price only to watch the price on the open market post IPO drop below the price you paid in the private market ? Ouch.”

    “The law of unintended consequences is that the dynamics for how private companies are valued and are able to raise Pre IPO rounds could quickly change if the prices and volumes on SecondMarket and its competitors declined significantly.”

    His third point keeps right on with a company’s valuation and how it really isn’t an indicator of anything. Share prices are ultimately dictated by supply and demand. Again he comments:

    “Valuation has no relevance what so ever. Conventional wisdom says the buyers of stocks will try to determine the value of a stock before they buy or sell and make the appropriate rational decision. Not even in a Richie Rich cartoon does that happen.”

    His fourth point is the pinnacle of the conversation. It has to do with mobile browsing and, as I have already said before, cuts right to the core of the issue. I’ll summarize. Do you really think people are going to start watching movies, going on Facebook, checking out YouTube videos explicitly on the mobile web? Essentially he believes you are an idiot if you buy into the notion that mobile will kill Facebook.

    Reasons? People have limited data plans and cannot afford to only use mobile devices for online entertainment. Second, the amount of desktop internet viewers is increasing every year. Third, the only other alternative you have to your mobile device is television if you decide to disconnect your home computer from the internet. I think that just about covers it. I’ll throw in that most mobile device screens are rather diminutive in size and not what I want to curl up to on the couch. He poses the question, do you really think mobile viewing is going to put Facebook under?

    Here’s exactly how he put it:

    “Bottom line, if you think mobile will displace online usage from PCs then you should immediately short Google and other ad plays and buy TV stations and networks. If you can’t buy an ad effectively on mobile and no one is using a PC to connect to the internet any more, then the only way to reach an audience is going to be via good old tv. And all that over the top video noise, forgettabout it.”

    The fifth point and grand conclusion to his post is that he purchased about 150.000 shares of Facebook for around $32 per share. So obviously he’s not banking on the shares being worthless by any means. I like what he’s saying and think it could be some good advice for evaluating future investments, especially tech IPO’s.

  • Big Investors Named in Facebook IPO Debacle

    In the wake of dwindling share prices following the Facebook IPO, Facebook has been accused of sharing certain information with key investors, leaving individual investors high and dry once the share prices took a nose dive. A Facebook executive has reportedly told analysts that business wasn’t as good as they initially thought. This info was given to large investors, but not small investors.

    We already know the underwriters who were sued by small investors for not giving them the information. Now we know at least two investors that were given information by these underwriters. According to The Wall Street Journal, Capital Reasearch & Management and Fidelity Investments, either backed out, or expressed concern over the new number they were given:

    Capital Research & Management wanted to buy into the Facebook Inc. initial public offering. But days before the IPO, an underwriting bank on the deal warned the big investment firm about Facebook’s dimming revenue prospects.
    The Los Angeles firm, armed with information from a May 11 “roadshow” meeting with underwriters and Facebook, along with similar estimates of its own, slashed the number of shares it intended to buy.

    Fidelity Investments was among big clients that were told by analysts or bank sales staff of the declining Facebook financial picture, people familiar with the matter say. The nation’s third-largest mutual fund firm expressed frustration to Morgan Stanley about Facebook valuations based on the dimming prospects for the company, the people say.

    [source: BusinessInsider]

  • Facebook Hit With Class Action Lawsuits Following Fubar IPO

    Whenever we here at WebProNews have speculated or reported on class action lawsuits filed against Facebook, the nature of those complaints has almost always had to do with the social networking giant’s dubious handling of user privacy. Given the remarkably awful situation that has plagued Facebook since its initial public offering this past Friday, the company has found a new way to attract class action lawsuits: pissing off investors.

    Berger & Montague, P.C., a law firm specializing in class action suits, alleges that Facebook, Morgan Stanley & Co. (the lead underwriter for Facebook’s IPO), J.P Morgan, and Goldman Sachs all failed to provide accurate information about Facebook’s decline in earnings growth to all Facebook investors prior to Friday’s IPO. According to a statement from Berger & Montague, while Facebook luminaries were out and about on the road show leading up to the IPO, the company guided the underwriters to materially lower their earnings forecast for 2012, leading each of the underwriters to reduce Facebook’s earnings estimates for the second quarter and full fiscal year 2012.

    Individual executives from Facebook were singled out in the suit, as indicated by the case’s extraordinarily long name:

    Goldrich Cousins P.C. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, David A. Ebersman, David M. Spillane, Marc L. Andreesen, Erskine B. Bowles, James W. Breyer, Donald E. Graham, Reed Hastings, Peter Thiel, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co.

    This lawsuit joins two (at least) other legal claims that have been filed against Facebook and its underwriters since the underwhelming and financially disastrous IPO. Three investors filed a lawsuit against Facebook for similar reasons in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, citing that the underwriters only shared the information of Facebook’s decreased earnings growth to a select few investors while leaving out others.

    As if the pile-on wasn’t high enough, a second law firm, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dow, also filed a class action law suit against Facebook yesterday for yet again the same reason: Facebook mislead investors by failing to disclose the fact that its revenue growth was slowing. Darren Robbins, a partner in the firm, told the Los Angeles Times that the fallout of Facebook’s IPO is “deeply troubling.”

    “The notion that the lead underwriters would contemporaneous with a road show and a filing of the registration statement receive information and thereafter materially reduce revenue projections for the very period the IPO occurred is nothing less than shocking,” Robbins said.

    “You’re telling one group of folks and giving them access to one thing while people are putting up more than $15 billion worth of cash,” he said. “There’s a reason why you have multiple investigations.”

    When asked for a comment about the lawsuits, a Facebook spokesman indicated that the company intends to stand its ground. “We believe the lawsuit is without merit and will defend ourselves vigorously,” he told WebProNews.

    I’d wager a bet – or is that too soon, since we’re talking about Facebook? – that Facebook is really super happy that it hired a law firm that specializes in class action defense all the way back in March.

    (This article has been updated from its original copy. It’s been edited to add the comment from Facebook’s spokesperson.)

  • VEVO Sees Increase in Facebook Traffic

    VEVO Sees Increase in Facebook Traffic

    Music video distribution service VEVO had said it planned to expand in 2012 back in March, and launched in 6 new countries, and also unveiled a redesign. And the new look and functionality has worked, as the platform has seen a 600% boost in Facebook-published content viewership.

    VEVO’s new player has taken advantage of Facebook’s Open Graph, and saw six times as many Facebook-watched videos since February, putting the latest count at 4.5 million. New user regristration is also up by 142%, with the platfrom adding 500,000 new members. VEVO Facebook impressions were up 181% as well, at 171 million.

    As a whole, VEVO logged 254 million video streams worldwide during Q1, 2012, a 32% jump from Q4, 2011. iPhone and iPad views were up as well, at 28% and 22% respectively. Engagement is also up as well, with viewers watching an average of 4.3 videos in March, up from 3.8 in February, spending 15.2 minutes on the site, up from 13.1.

    Like all things associated with Facebook, there is typically a bump in exposure – thing is, it’s not yet clear if the social network will figure out a way to better monetize this sort of thing, mainly via its ad content. It’s IPO has turned into a bit of snafu, and its stocks are doing far less than stellar. Time will tell how things play out for the potential next Myspace.

  • Facebook Might Switch to NYSE after Nasdaq Failure

    Facebook stock closed at $31.99 per share yesterday, and some speculate that there truly is no limit on how low it can go. One of several factors that might’ve contributed to the sensational IPO’s less than stellar performance was an alleged technical problem at NASDAQ early on, which has prompted some investors to sue, and likewise drew the attention of the SEC and FINRA.

    Now Facebook might consider listing with the New York Stock Exchange, in the wake of its embattled IPO, according to two sources familiar with the matter. These sources told CNBC that NYSE officials have been reaching out to Facebook concerning a possible switch. Though, NYSE states that no discussions have occurred, and that these dealings wouldn’t “be appropriate at this time” regardless. The anonymous sources added that Facebook is open to talks.

    Nasdaq’s technical glitches have so far been one of the larger excuses for the problems experienced during initial FB trading, to where investors lost money because their buy, sell or cancellation orders weren’t going through. Nasdaq officials maintain that all order confirmations were filed at 1:50pm ET on the day of the IPO, though as of Tuesday, many investors still hadn’t received any order confirmations, which prompted all sorts of intrigue.

    If Facebook were to decide to switch, David Wield, a former Nasdaq vice chairman, states, “It’s not hard (to switch listings), – Both firms (NYSE and Nasdaq) handle this sort of things all the time.”

  • Facebook Wants You to Buy Premium Ads Via Power Editor, API

    Can you recall back to February when Facebook was still a private company but was planning to flip into the public realm in a few months? Remember back then at the company’s marketing conference when COO Sheryl Sandberg and friends pitched Facebook to businesses and announced a new series of advertising options on the website, such as premium ads? This was the first leg of Facebook’s attempt to start making money off of its mobile platform.

    You could be forgiven for having let that day slip from your mind given how all of the news these days about Facebook’s struggling Nasdaq performance, but Facebook doesn’t want you to forget about those premium ads. Especially now of all times.

    That may be why Facebook is attempting to jog the memory of advertisers by introducing a new tool to ease the purchase of premium ads. Facebook may soon add the capability to purchase premium ads through the use of the the site’s power editor, a tool that lets advertisers mass edit ads as well as monitor how those ads are faring out in the wild. The company is said to be collaborating with developers and advertisers in order to come up with more ways for businesses to buy ads – features that may be rolling out in a matter of weeks.

    In addition to adding the ability to purchase ads within power editor, look out for a second ad-purchasing tool through Facebook’s API.

    Regardless of whether the ads actually do anything for advertisers, Facebook is really trying to expedite the management of the premium ads lately. In March, the company launched a handy-dandy demo tool for premium ads so that businesses could get a clearer glimpse of what their ads were going to look like once they were officially deployed.

  • Facebook Stock Closes at $32 on Wednesday

    Facebook Stock Closes at $32 on Wednesday

    Facebook stock is once again closing in the $30 price range at $31.99 as the Nasdaq market closed at 4PM today. It opened at $31.37, rose as high as $32.50, and dipped as low as $31.36. So not a lot of variety there. Of course, the stock prices themselves haven’t really been the news as far as the Facebook IPO goes.

    Earlier today we found out that regulators are undertaking an investigation to find out what happened with a revised forecast that was drafted last week showing Facebook having diminished revenues for the remainder of 2012. Apparently, Morgan Stanley concealed the report as Facebook’s IPO roadshow raised investor interest, but tipped off a select few about the reduced forecast just before the IPO.

    We also learned that several major Facebook shareholders have filed lawsuits against Facebook and its underwriters for suppressing the reports and allowing them to make what otherwise might be called “bad investments”. The state of Massachusetts has also launched an investigation of the events and has subpoenaed documents relating to the revised forecast.

    To make matters worse, the Securities and Exchange Commission says they are also looking into several issues surrounding the Facebook IPO. I believe their focus is centered on the revised forecasts as well, but also Facebook’s S-1 documents and Nasdaq’s communication issue at the beginning of trading on Friday.

    Aside from that, Morgan Stanley has also announced they will be reviewing every trade from Friday’s IPO launch and adjusting the trades to reflect the fairest market price. So that’s some good news for Facebook investors.

    All and all, things really aren’t looking that great for Facebook and their biggest underwriters. Of course, we will be keeping track of all these IPO dealings and filling you in as news becomes available. Check back regularly for updates.

  • Morgan Stanley to Adjust Facebook Prices for Retail Customers

    Morgan Stanley to Adjust Facebook Prices for Retail Customers

    Good news for early Facebook IPO investors who may have been a victim of Nasdaq’s computer communication glitch, Morgan Stanley is reviewing all of the trades that went through on that day. As you remember, trading was delayed by a half hour Friday morning as big bank trading desks attempted to verify who bought what and at what price. The issue was quickly resolved, but the delay caused a temporary spike in trading that quickly settled back down to the $38 targeted per share price.

    The market closed at just over $38 on Friday. The weekend didn’t reflect any prominent trading either and by monday at 4PM, Facebook closed at $34. Tuesday saw more declines and closed at just over $31 and trades today haven’t strayed too much from that price range. In fact, it looks like $30 would have been an ideal price range for the offering.

    Anyway, the trading reviews from Morgan Stanley are welcome news for many investors who may have overpaid. Reuters obtained a copy of the official memo put out by the bank regarding their review of the trades on Friday.

    Here are a few key statements taken from Morgan Stanley’s memo:

    “All orders are currently being reviewed for best execution pricing,”

    “We expect there will be a number of price adjustments. The largest adjustments will be processed first over the next several days and the remaining adjustments will be completed as quickly and as thoroughly as possible.”

    The news of the review comes as several investors in New York, California, and most likely Massachusetts filed lawsuits over revenue projections that were allegedly kept secret during Facebook’s promotional IPO investors roadshow and subsequent IPO launch. The lawsuits in California in New York are over damages sustained from being misinformed about the health of the investments.

    Massachusetts has yet to actually file a suit, but officials have subpoenaed documents relating to the revenue forecasts. Meanwhile investors and experts in the financial sector are calling the sequence of events an outrage. It has all the workings of a really great scandal.

    Oh, I almost forgot, Wall Street regulators are now investigating the allegations that some of the big bank investors were tipped off about the revised earnings projections, while others were left in the dark. Some banks have even come forward to say they believe Facebook fudged some of their own numbers to make investments seem more favorable. It just keeps getting worse. Check back regularly and we’ll keep you informed as this thing evolves.

  • Facebook IPO Earns Zuckerberg $1.1 Billion

    Facebook IPO Earns Zuckerberg $1.1 Billion

    When Facebook launched it’s IPO on Friday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg contributed 30.2 million of his own shares in the company to the sale. Those shares, as it turns out, sold for $37.58 each, netting Zuckerberg a cool $1.1 billion dollars.

    Unfortunately, however, Zuckerberg doesn’t get to do a Scrooge McDuck impression and go swimming in all that money. According to the LA Times, the bulk of that money will go to filling Uncle Sam’s money bin in the form of taxes. Zuckerberg, however, still has another 503.6 million shares of the company, meaning that he’s still worth billions of dollars

    Just how many billions of dollars those shares are worth, though, has fluctuated wildly over the past few days. Shortly after opening on Friday, Facebook’s stock price briefly shot up to $42 per share, a significant jump over its $38 per share IPO price. Since then, however, the stock has mostly been on a downward slide, and is currently trading at $31.88 per share (though that’s 2.84% higher than its opening price this morning).

    Facebook's Stock Price

    At the current price, Zuckerberg’s remaining shares are worth a little over $16 billion. Facebook’s market cap, meanwhile, is sitting at $68.14 billion. Facebook’s IPO has performed poorly thus far to say the least, and with the controversy brewing surrounding Morgan Stanley’s revised revenue report, it may be a long while before the stock shows much gain.

  • Facebook IPO Scandal: Was the Nasdaq Glitch Real?

    Perhaps we are all overreacting to the Facebook/Nasdaq/Morgan Stanley issue by calling it a scandal. But experience has taught many of us a valuable lesson; if it looks like a fish, swims like a fish, and smells like a fish, it’s probably a fish. As we just reported last hour, Investors in New York and California have filed lawsuits against Facebook and its underwriters for failing to disclose a revised financial forecast that revealed reduced income for Facebook throughout 2012. Also, Massachusetts state has subpoenaed the documents surrounding the revised forecast from a Morgan Stanley financial expert.

    In an effort to pacify those who are conspiracy theorists, or just to indulge those pissed off about the whole thing, I thought it would be nice to offer some details about how the Facebook IPO scandal might have played out. First you have Facebook on tour promoting their IPO. Next, they learn that a shift in the number of users on mobile is hurting their potential for increased ad revenue. They react and update their SEC S-1 paperwork to reflect the threat.

    The big banks get their financial experts working on how the mobile threat might actually diminish revenue for Facebook in the current financial quarter and beyond. The reports come out and reflect what Facebook already knows and told the SEC (and the general public if you’re prone to reading such documents). The big banks fail to release the financial reports because they are worried the bad press will hurt investor interest in the stock.

    Big investors and Facebook insiders get word of the poor revenue forecast, decide to dump some of their shares in the IPO as well. Facebook, in the meantime Facebook decides to capitalize on the early overwhelming demand for shares and offers $50 million more and jacks up the price. On the first day of trading they dump a ton of shares all over the institutions offering them and keep just enough to make it look like they got burned too.

    Finally, on opening day, they claim a big computer glitch occurred that kept them from recognizing that anybody had cancelled their order for Facebook shares. In the meantime, a couple of folks made a lot of money on what experts might be inclined to call, a “bad investment”.

    Again, I am not saying any of this happened. It is just a conspiracy theory from someone who has to report on all these puzzle pieces. So that’s my disclaimer. I am not a Facebook insider nor do I have first hand knowledge of any of the events. The stories I link to however, are based on fact, and are real news.

  • Facebook and IPO Underwriters Sued by Investors

    If you thought Facebook was in the news a lot for their patent lawsuits, welcome to IPO litigation. Interested parties are crawling out of the woodwork to contest the bullshit events that surround Facebook’s IPO and everyone involved. As we just reported this morning, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has subpoenaed documents pertaining to Morgan Stanley’s revised revenue forecast the week before the Facebook IPO. The gist of that report is a decreased ad revenue projected for the company spanning the remainder of 2012.

    Now, Reuters has gotten word that some of Facebook’s largest shareholders have filed a suit in New York claiming top executives involved in the IPO concealed critical documents during the IPO’s promotional investor roadshow. Which, actually, we already know they did. The lawsuit was filed today in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan. Obviously the investors are suing for losses and damages stemming from what can only be called a “bad investment”. The complain reads,”the value of Facebook common stock has declined substantially and plaintiffs and the class have sustained damages as a result,”. On Tuesday, a similar case was filed in California relating to the exact same issue.

    As I mentioned this morning, It seems the reaction to the reduced earnings projections was to issue more shares and increase the price of them. If you remember, Facebook added over 50 million shares to the IPO just days before the offering. Now even more suspicious, is the huge amount of shares voluntarily offered by Facebook insiders and early investors, also just before the IPO. It seems like they knew the stock would decline shortly after the offering.

    So it appears a lot of people got rich off the IPO, but unfortunately for some, a lot of people are also going to be sued. So much for the much anticipated Facebook IPO. It may not go down as one of highest revenue generating offers, but it may be one of the biggest scandals. We’ll keep you posted as new information becomes available.

  • Investor Sues Nasdaq Over Facebook IPO

    Investor Sues Nasdaq Over Facebook IPO

    Maryland Facebook investor Phillip Goldberg has just filed a complaint against Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. regarding “badly mishandled” trades upon the social network’s IPO. Goldberg aims to represent a group of investors who saw orders not processed correctly, which prompted them to lose money. Goldberg went through Charles Schwab to try to trade shares, and perhaps ran into some snags – The screen below is what I’d encountered when I’d tested out a trade on the day of the IPO:

    facebook ipo

    Goldman claimed that Nasdaq had acted negligently, stating, “Orders placed by investors seeking to purchase Facebook shares during the first trading day often took hours to execute. In the meantime, the investors seeking to purchase those shares had no idea if their trades had executed, and, accordingly, had no idea if they owned Facebook shares at all.”

    Nasdaq or Facebook have yet to comment, though technical glitches have so far been the general excuse for the problems experienced during initial FB trading, to where investors lost money because their buy, sell or cancellation orders weren’t going through. Facebook just settled on a lawsuit concerning its Sponsored Stories feature, and as more details emerge regarding possible misleadings during the IPO, it’s possible the network might end up in court again. There is a chance that a bit of hot water will ensue for underwriters of the IPO, if rumors of Facebook’s revised revenue reports have merit.

  • Facebook IPO Revised Revenue Report Scandal

    Probably not surprising to most of you, big banks, and underwriters of the Facebook IPO deal, had inside information on the company’s inevitably shrinking revenues before trading even began. As we reported yesterday, Morgan Stanley’s financial forecasters issued a revised report early last week detailing an over 6% decline in revenue for the second quarter of 2012. The revisions stems from an update Facebook made to SEC S-1 documents stating a threat to financial health form the large population of users switching to mobile.

    Essentially once a Facebook user switches to mobile usage, they view less ads, thereby rendering current advertising efforts less efficient and less effective. Facebook did the appropriate thing. They listed the threat in their financial report and immediately began the arduous process of addressing their shortcomings in the mobile user category. Any healthy confident organization would have handled the situation the same way; they would view it as a challenge and an opportunity for growth.

    Anyway, back to the revised reports from the big banks involved. Apparently nothing official went out, but Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and JP MOrgan executives were all briefed about the revised forecasts through conference calls and personal conversations long before IPO trading even kicked off. Of course, now the Securities Division of the Massachusetts Commonwealth has subpoenaed the documents and wants to know a lot more about the scenario, and so do the rest of us.

    Take a look at the revised full-year revenue forecasts for the big banks involved:

    Morgan Stanley — $4.854 bln (new)from $5.036 bln (old)

    Bank of America — $4.815 bln (new) from $5.040 bln (old)

    JPMorgan — $4.839 bln (new) from $5.044 bln (old)

    Goldman Sachs — $4.852 bln (new) from $5.169 bln (old)

    Lowered estimates for second-quarter 2012

    Morgan Stanley — $1.111 bln (new) from $1.175 bln (old)

    Bank of America — $1.100 bln (new) from $1.166 bln (old)

    JPMorgan — $1.096 bln (new) from $1.182 bln (old)

    Goldman Sachs — $1.125 bln (new) from $ 1.207 bln (old)

    Lowered 2013 Earnings per share estimate

    Morgan Stanley — 83 cents (new) from 88 cents

    Bank of America — 64 cents (new) from 66 cents

    JPMorgan — 66 cents (new) from 70 cents

    Goldman Sachs — 63 cents (new) from 68 cents

    According to Reuters, executives had these numbers by May 10th, a full week before the Facebook IPO even launched. Yet there we were just days before the IPO seeing millions more shares being released and the price growing almost $10 per share from what the original estimations were. So I can only conclude that the response to decreased revenue forecasts was to jack up the price and offer more shares. Seems counterintuitive to me, but I’m no Wall Street guru. I just figure, if I know somethings going to be worth less, I can’t, in good conscience, really justify charging the public more.

    My conscience aside, it doesn’t seem on the up and up to the SEC so they are getting involved, and my guess is, they will be going through the whole Facebook IPO with a fine-toothed comb. We’ll see. Check back for new news as the story unfolds.

  • Facebook IPO: Morgan Stanley Subpoenaed In Massachusetts

    Yesterday morning we brought you news that Morgan Stanley had lowered Facebook’s revenue forecast in the days before the company’s IPO, but that the news was kept quiet during the IPO roadshow that led up to the IPO on last Friday.

    As you might expect, this news has drawn the attention of a variety of authorities. Yesterday afternoon, Mary Schapiro, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, announced that her agency would be examining the irregularities surrounding Facebook’s IPO. Now it seems that the state of Massachusetts is also getting in on the act. According to a report from Reuters late yesterday, William Galvin, Masschusetts Secretary of Commonwealth, has issued a subpoena to Morgan stanley. According to a statement obtained by Reuters, the securities division of Secretary Galvin’s office is concerned with “the analyst’s discussion with certain institutional investors about the revenue prospects for Facebook.”

    Requests for comment to Morgan Stanley, the office of the Massachusetts Secretary of Commonwealth, and Facebook have not yet been returned. We will bring you more information about this story as it unfolds.

  • Facebook Says “No” to Paper Stock Certificates

    Those collectors who were hoping to frame their paper stock certificate for their Facebook shares are out of luck. According to AllFacebook, Facebook has changed its mind and will not be offering paper stock certificates, even as a collectible. GiveAShare.com will, however, offer collectors a certificate that is similar to an official one, with statements from Facebook’s transfer agent showing account numbers for stock holdings. OneShare.com will provide a similar service.

    Facebook, in its IPO filing, had originally planned to issue the paper stock certificates. According to AllFacebook, CNNMoney and OneShare.com, which were planning on selling Facebook shares that would come with a frame or plaque, had far more orders than usual for the stock certificates. There is no official word on why Facebook has changed its stance and decided against issuing the certificates.

    Facebook’s IPO has been considered lackluster, at best. The company’s lowered stock price is being blamed on a combination of NASDAQ technical glitches and secret, last-minute changes in revenue projections. The technical difficulties could be due to large retail buyer demand, possibly these collectors who simply wanted one share of Facebook to show off on their wall. As for the revenue projections, Wall Street is blaming the IPO underwriters.

    (via AllFacebook)