WebProNews

Tag: Facebook IPO

  • Facebook Offers 70 Million More Shares, Heads To Court Over IPO

    Facebook announced on Thursday that it is offering 70,000,000 new shares of its Class A common stock, with 27,004,761 shares being offered by the company itself and 42,995,239 shares being offered by certain selling stockholders, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is offering 41,350,000 shares.

    The company plans to use the net proceeds from the offering for working capital and “other corporate purposes.” The company won’t receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by stockholders, but expects that the majority of the net proceeds Zuckerberg will receive “will be used to satisfy taxes he will incur in connection with his exercise, in full, of an outstanding stock option to purchase 60,000,000 shares of Class B common stock.”

    J.P. Morgan, BofA Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Barclays are serving as joint bookrunners for the offering, with BNP Paribas, Citigroup, RBC Capital Markets, Credit Suisse, HSBC, Standard Chartered and Piper Jaffray serving as co-managers.

    Starting at the close of trading on Friday, Standard & Poor’s plans to include Facebook Class A common stock in the S&P 500 index. Shares will be offered primarily to index funds whose portfolios are based on stocks included in the index, Facebook says.

    Facebook stock is on the decline in pre-market trading.

    On Thursday, a judge ruled that Facebook and numerous banks will have to face a lawsuit alleging that the company misled investors about its health ahead of its IPO.

    Reuters shares a statement from Facebook: “We continue to believe this suit lacks merit and look forward to a full airing of the facts.”

    Meanwhile, Facebook begins running a potentially major source of revenue today with its new autoplay video ads, which it thinks can give television advertising a run for its money.

    Image: Mark Zuckerberg

  • Facebook Stock Rallies, Nearly Hits Its IPO Price

    For the first time since the IPO, Facebook stock approached $38 a share today.

    It didn’t actually hit that significant number (that’s what the stock started out at back in May) – but it came close. Really close. Its high for the day was $37.96 – an increase of nearly 7% from its opening.

    For Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of Facebook family, this must feel pretty good. After debuting strong in May 2012 – hitting $45 shortly after the IPO, Facebook’s stock began to fall, and fall hard. At its low point in August of 2012, the stock price dipped below $18 – less than half of the original price. The most cited reason for Facebook’s problems was a distrust from investors – mainly Facebook’s inability to monetize mobile. Sure, users continued to grow – but for the Street, it was all about those advertising successes (and lack thereof).

    This recent uptick in Facebook’s stock began last week, when the company posted strong Q2 earnings with a revenue of $1.81 billion. Revenue from advertising shot up from 61% in Q2 2012 to 88%. More importantly, mobile ad revenue accounted for 41% of Facebook’s ad total ad revenue for the quarter – up 11% year-over year.

    That seemed to be the impetus, and Facebook’s stock began to climb.

    Here’s what Facebook’s stock has looked like over the past month or so. I guess you can call it a comeback.

    Also, Facebook announced today that they are starting a new mobile game publishing program – one that will generate even more revenue. And according to reports, those long-rumored video ads are soon coming to your news feed at $2.5 million a pop.

  • Facebook and Its IPO Made San Mateo County the Highest-Paid County in America

    According to figures just released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Facebook’s May 2012 IPO made San Mateo county, California the most well-paid area in the country.

    The average weekly worker wage in San Mateo County, California (home to Facebook’s Menlo Park campus) was $3,240 in Q4 of 2012. That’s over a thousand dollars a month more than the second-place county, New York, NY ($2,107). It’s an increase of over 107% from Q4 2011. Overall, the average weekly wage in all of America increased 4.7%.

    That amounts to a $1,677 a week increase in San Mateo, compared to a $45 increase overal in the U.S. That average salary for San Mateo county workers comes out to $168,480.

    Of course, in the time between Q4 2011 and Q4 2012, Facebook launched their IPO. We knew it would make a bunch of Facebook employees millionaires – but we didn’t know just how massive of an effect it would have on the economy of the area.

    As you may expect, the specific industry in San Mateo County that gained the most over the past year was “computer systems design services.” That particular sector accounted for $6.8 billion of total wages in Q4 – or $82,891 per week.

    Of course, this doesn’t signify weekly take home pay. “Wages” includes things like stock and stock options.

    “That kind of a jump can only be explained by what’s happening with stock and stock options from recent IPOs. It will be interesting to see if that wealth bump is reflected in giving back to the community,” said Doug Henton of a local San Meteo consulting firm.

    Basically, Facebook’s IPO singlehandedly made one county the most well-paid county in the entire United States. Whoa.

    [via The Wall Street Journal]

  • New Facebook Lawsuit, Same Old Facebook IPO Gripe

    A new lawsuit filed by a Facebook shareholder claims that the company knew about downward trends in revenue tied to increased user defection to mobile from desktop use.

    Gaye Jones says that such information was shared with key investors.

    “The defendants were unjustly enriched because they realized enormous profits and financial benefits from the IPO, despite knowing that reduced revenue and earnings forecasts for the company had not been publicly disclosed to investors,” says the lawsuit.

    This is definitely not the first time that a lawsuit has been filed with a nearly identical claim.

    Soon after Facebook’s stock price began to plummet, a flood of lawsuits poured in accusing Facebook of concealing severe reductions in revenue growth due to the increase in mobile users and Facebook’s perceived inability to monetize mobile.

    So, new lawsuit, similar complaint.

    Jones’ new lawsuit is a derivative suit, which means that the investor “seeks to step into the shoes of the company and any money recovered from Zuckerberg and others would be paid to Facebook, not shareholders.”

    Four previous derivative suits have been dismissed after a U.S. District Judge ruled that the shareholders did not own stock when Facebook allegedly deceived them before the IPO. Plus, he said that Facebook indeed “repeatedly made express and extensive warnings” about the trend toward mobile. In this case, Jones did in fact own Facebook stock since February 2012, months before the IPO filing in May.

    Back in January, Facebook stock rode an upward trend and topped $30 for the first time in nearly six months. As of right now, the price sits at just over $27.50.

    [Reuters]

  • Facebook Wants to Keep “FB” on the Nasdaq Exchange

    As of yesterday, Facebook executives have decided it’s a good idea to keep their stock, ticker symbol “FB”, listed on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange.

    Previously the company had debated taking their shares over to the NYSE after Nasdaq experienced a devastating computer glitch that left big bank trading desks flying blind on the morning of their IPO launched.

    Currently, Facebook, the Nasdaq, and Facebook’s lead underwriters are facing investor lawsuits stemming from the botched IPO. More recently, Facebook has put a lot of the blame on the Nasdaq for poor trading performance and decrease investor confidence.

    While Facebook and its underwriters are seeking to consolidate their lawsuits, Nasdaq is being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators for the alterations they made to computer codes which they say led to the computer communication breakdown.

    In the meantime, Nasdaq has taken steps to compensate investors who incurred loses on the first day of Facebook trading as a result of the glitch. Facebook, on the other hand, still claims they carried out the IPO in a way that complies with all regulatory guidelines, and with full financial disclosure to investors.

    So, as we wait to see what the outcome of these lawsuits and investigations will be, Facebook has decided there couldn’t be any harm in sticking with the exchange they originally chose. I think it’s a really good idea to stick with the Nasdaq. I don’t think investors, the Nasdaq, or Facebook can sustain anymore upheaval surrounding the IPO. It’s wise to buckle down and get all the non-sense cleared up first.

    Stability should be the strategy going forward. Hopefully, going public wont be seen as Facebook’s first step to going down the tubes when we look back. While the way the deal went down hurt investor confidence and jaded many other internet property’s decisions to go public, it could just be a temporary setback if they play their cards right.

  • Facebook Underwriters Unsure About Q2 Performance

    Estimates of Facebook’s second quarter financial performance are starting to pour in, and not surprisingly, the social network’s lead underwriters are predicting some of the lowest numbers.

    The general estimation for Facebook revenue comes in at around $1.16 billion and $0.12 per share. Morgan Stanley is saying it will be more like $1.11 billion with $0.10 per share. Goldman Sachs says $1.125 billion and $0.11 per share.

    Also noteworthy, half of Facebook’s underwriters initiated coverage with a hold rating, while Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs have it at a Buy recommendation.

    Currently, Facebook shares are trading around $32.67 which is pretty good considering their price fell as low as $25 just a few weeks ago. It’s unlikely that shares will return to their $38 per share target price they were selling for on the first day of the IPO, but things are looking somewhat promising.

    Scott Devitt of Morgan Stanley starts coverage as Overweight with a target price of $38, but sees it falling as low as $22 or rising as high as $52. Heather Bellini of Goldman Sachs is giving Facebook a Buy rating at a $42 target price.

    On the flip-side, Justin Post of Merrill Lynch gives Facebook a Neutral rating with a $38 target price. Spencer Wang of Credit Suisse also gave them a Neutral rating, but put the target price at $34.

    Obviously, we will just have to wait and see what happens. Overall Facebook is doing a lot better than some could have predicted. Of course, they are left with a lot of lawsuits and investigations to contend with as a result of their totally dysfunctional IPO launch, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t going to perform over the longterm. We’ll keep you posted.

  • SEC Investigates Nasdaq and NYSE After Facebook IPO Breakdown

    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) isn’t buying that Nasdaq’s much publicized computer glitch on the opening day of Facebook’s IPO was the root cause for all the confusion.

    In fact, they have seen a couple other cases of so called, trading communication breakdowns coming from the NYSE, and now they want answers.

    According to Nasdaq, they rewrote some computer code in an effort to jump start trading on the day of the IPO, and believe that is what could have led to the breakdown.

    While the SEC is concerned that stock exchanges aren’t properly testing their equipment, they are also looking into whether the Nasdaq violated rules when it rewrote the code. More importantly, the agency’s enforcement unit has opened several cases to investigate the controls currently in place at all stock exchanges.

    The SEC is also looking into whether some exchanges are giving preferable treatment to high-end customers and firms who repeatedly place large orders. Trust in the exchanges is an integral part of the system and regulators are working to make sure guiltiness are being enforced.

    Aside from glitches with the exchanges, federal lawmakers are also pushing for reform in the way public offering are priced and the disclosure of that information. More specifically they have expressed concern over how much power banks have in the process. U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa sent a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday informing them that new rules are needed.

    Early last week, Facebook filed documents with the courts hoping to consolidate investor lawsuits stemming from the IPO. They also blamed Nasdaq for a majority of the problems claiming their malfunction scared off investors and eroded demand.

    If you remember, Facebook stock sunk down to the $25 range for awhile, but it has slowly crept back up to $33. They still haven’t gotten anywhere near the $38 per share opening day price, but it looks like that are at atleast stable in the lower $30’s.

    So hopefully we’ll see some resolve to these investigations and lawsuits sometime soon. It’s only been a month since the IPO, but it seems like the list of headaches coming out of the event for everybody just keeps growing. It can’t be good for anyone’s business. We’ll keep you updated on all things Facebook.

  • LivingSocial Not Going Public Anytime Soon

    In light of the totally botched Facebook IPO, it’s no wonder many tech companies are in no hurry to go public.

    According to LivingSocial CEO Tim O’Shaugnessy, you can add LivingSocial to that list. Despite recent losses for the company, they are aren’t hurting for the capital an IPO would bring in.

    LivingSocial was recently able to raise $600 million in venture capital with Amazon controlling nearly 30% of the company.

    While LivingSocial isn’t as popular as their closest competitor, Groupon, they aren’t looking to be acquired either. In fact, they invested heavily last year in ways to diversify and grow their business. Currently, Groupon is holding about 60% share of the daily deals market, and LivingSocial is holding 26%. There’s definitely room for growth.

    The Washington, D.C.-based company is expanding regardless of not finding the diversity it needs to grow in the market. The D.C. City Council, and local business professionals are working on a tax abatement for LivingSocial in order to help them expand their operation within the city and attract more top-level talent to the tech laden area.

    So while it looks like LivingSocial is joining the long list of tech companies totally off-put by the idea of going public, they have no desire to be acquired and continue to advance efforts to grow their business, and diversify their daily deal offerings.

    Facebook aside, LivingSocial need only look at Groupon, their closest competitor, to see going public isn’t necessarily a fast-track to success.

  • Nasdaq Glitch Blamed for Facebook’s Abysmal IPO Performance

    As we reported on Friday, Nasdaq is getting the blame for Facebook’s botched IPO launch and the subsequent poor trading performance in the days that followed.

    The remarks come from a court filing by Facebook and Morgan Stanley who seek to combine more than 40 state and federal lawsuits brought against Facebook and their lead underwriters stemming from the events of their May 18th initial public offering.

    Essentially, the filing states that Facebook and their underwriters didn’t do anything illegal or out of the ordinary regarding the IPO, and that the poor trading performance is more the result of Nasdaq’s, now infamous, trading desk computer glitch than anything else.

    The court filing explains:

    “The commencement of trading in Facebook shares was delayed as a result of problems with Nasdaq’s software systems, which impaired the orderly execution of trades and price levels,”

    Facebook also released all of the communications they had with the Securities and Exchange Commission in a separate filing in the months before the IPO period. This is a common practice for a company after the confidential period during an IPO ends.

    In the meantime, Facebook shares are trading up around $32, which should come as a relief to investors. The stock climb seems to coincide with ComScore’s latest report on the effectiveness of the company’s advertising model. According to ComScore, Facebook brand advertising does result in a significant lift when it comes time for consumers to purchase and select on brand over another.

    So, while we might not see Facebook trading back trading at $38 per share, there still seems to be a lot of interest in owning stock in the company. As with any investment, only time will tell.

  • Why Facebook Isn’t a Bad Investment for Everyone

    Back on the 12th of June, Harvard Business Review (HBR) published an article explaining how so many investors were enticed by Facebook’s public offering and why it wasn’t a good idea, according to their principals of investment, to jump on the investment.

    The first point they raise involves small investors, and the mentality they took when evaluating the investment. According to HBR, there were many who rushed out and to open their first investment account just to take advantage of Facebook’s offering. They believed it was the next big thing and just had to be a part of it.

    As many of us already know, and it is easy to say in retrospect, Facebook has already been around too long to be the next big thing. In fact, Facebook was the next big thing half a decade ago. So those operating under this premiss were already at least five years behind the trends.

    Also according to HBR, many people believed it was a sound investment because of a psychological phenomenon commonly referred to as Availability Bias. They specifically reference a man who took $5000 of his own money, then borrowed another $5000 from his mother, and put it all in Facebook (this was all the money he had).

    With the above imagery in mind, consider the definition of Availability Bias:

    “Availability Bias: When confronted with a decision, humans’ thinking is influenced by what is personally relevant, salient, recent or dramatic. Put another way, humans estimate the probability of an outcome based on how easy that outcome is to imagine.”

    Now this is a very reasonable explanation for the man’s mistake however, if you are making your very first investment, without the aid of a professional, it is just plain stupidity to invest your entire nest egg (savings), and part of someone else’s, in something you feel as a gut reaction, or shorthand to an informed decision.

    Gut reactions are typically reserved for someone who has knowledge of the playing field and has learned a lesson or two.

    Furthermore, it is very unwise, and probably violates the most elementary rule of investments, to take all your resources and bet them on one horse (one company’s stock). I think everyone knows, whether you’re investing $500 or $10,000, balance is the key.

    For instance, If you have a lot invested in risky up and coming technology stocks, it is also a good idea to balance those investments with something mature, stable, and not likely to go away anytime soon.

    When investors pull their money out of high-risk areas because of a huge loss, they usually funnel that capital back into stable investments, and can temporarily create gains in large, stable stocks. The whole balance theory.

    The HBR does give some excellent advice in their article to help people with future investments:

    * Focus on discovering customers’ needs. When you discover unmet customer needs, you naturally create a differentiated offering with true market value. Easy to say, but the trick here is to make sure you really are looking for customers’ needs — not just convincing yourself that customers need what you, or everyone else, want to make.

    * Pursue a long-term strategy. In an effective strategy, short-term moves should be leading you toward a desired outcome in the long term. A collection of opportunistic bets, no matter how sure they seem in the moment, is not a strategy. Would any solid personal financial plan have advocated liquidating mutual and bond funds to bet the farm on Facebook?

    * Don’t follow the herd. We’re all human, and there’s emotional comfort in doing what everyone else is doing. Recognize that feeling — and then make sure that you’re not letting it cloud your judgment. Be vigilant and actually evaluate each investment opportunity on its merits, not on its media profile.

    These are great pieces of advice, but as I already alluded to, this type of thinking is more common sense, and probably not even remotely typical of savvy investors. Most people who play the stock market don’t expect to invest $10,000 one day and have $35,000 appear the next day; it’s not a get rich quick scheme.

    Investments guru, Mark Cuban explained what he thought about the Facebook IPO, but it wasn’t an abysmal assessment as one might expect. He purchased huge amounts of Facebook shares as well, and he believes it was a wise investment.

    His first point was to say that big investors always exploit stupidity on the market, because they know it always works. Essentially, financial firms use disinformation to manipulate market behavior. Experts predicted the Facebook IPO would have one of the biggest small investor turnouts in history, and it did. Big banks and Nasdaq hyped the hell out of it.

    Mark Cuban comments on the Facebook IPO and shares of the company:

    “Can you imagine how pissed you would be if you bought a boatload of Facebook thinking you got in at a better than IPO price only to watch the price on the open market post IPO drop below the price you paid in the private market ? Ouch.”

    “The law of unintended consequences is that the dynamics for how private companies are valued and are able to raise Pre IPO rounds could quickly change if the prices and volumes on SecondMarket and its competitors declined significantly.”

    “Valuation has no relevance what so ever. Conventional wisdom says the buyers of stocks will try to determine the value of a stock before they buy or sell and make the appropriate rational decision. Not even in a Richie Rich cartoon does that happen.”

    “Bottom line, if you think mobile will displace online usage from PCs then you should immediately short Google and other ad plays and buy TV stations and networks. If you can’t buy an ad effectively on mobile and no one is using a PC to connect to the internet any more, then the only way to reach an audience is going to be via good old tv. And all that over the top video noise, forgettabout it.”

    Cuban purchased a boatload of Facebook shares himself, but again, it’s not his only investment, and he’s not expecting all the return on his investments a week later. He believes it could end up being a valuable investment, but not because everyone he knows uses it.

    If you are letting the availability of information already in your head replace good old fashion research, you’re selling yourself short. If you follow the herd when it comes to investing, you are probably headed where most herds end up. At the slaughterhouse.

    It’s good to take calculated risks, but not blind leaps. Facebook may yet prove to be a valuable investment, but like all good things, it doesn’t happen overnight. Also, when prices are low, like Facebook shares are right now, it’s the time to buy, especially if you can afford the gamble.

  • Facebook Blames Nasdaq and Wants to Consolidate IPO Investor Lawsuits

    The one month anniversary of Facebook’s much anticipated initial public offering is close at hand, and the social networking giant has yet to address investor concern or the countless lawsuits which have been filed against the Nasdaq, Mark Zuckerberg, or even Facebook itself.

    According to what an inside source told the New York Times, Facebook intends to file a motion to consolidate all of the lawsuits regarding the IPO. They also plan to pass some of the blame off on the Nasdaq stock exchange. Facebook’s lead underwriters, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs, plan to join the social networking site in this motion.

    Despite very poor stock performance since the day of the IPO, Facebook and the Nasdaq considerer the IPO a success, but obviously can’t deny it is not without its faults.

    So while we wait to see what the lawsuits will bring, Facebook hasn’t been slacking. Just days after the IPO they continued their global expansion plans opening a new office in Dubai committed to serving advertising demands in the Middle East and North Africa.

    Facebook also took action to address their shortcomings in the mobile advertising arena and made some much needed refinements to the platform. Even more important, ComScore released a new study that supports Facebook’s advertising model, claiming that exposure to branded advertising does indeed result in a significant lift when it comes time for consumers to purchase.

    Also noteworthy, Facebook just took on a several interns and hired some new talent. In fact, it looks like they just filled about 25 positions and are still hiring. Inside Facebook published a list of new hires and another list featuring all the positions which have been taken down from their careers website, presumably already filled.

    So it seems like things are going as expected for Facebook despite the slew of lawsuits and ongoing investigations. We’ll keep you informed as news becomes available about the IPO lawsuits and whatever else pops up.

  • UBS Lost $350 Million on Facebook IPO Trades

    Earlier this week we reported that the Nasdaq stock exchange had set aside $40 million to compensate investors who were hurt financially by the computer glitch that plagued Facebook trading early on during the IPO launch. You might recall, the glitch left big bank trading desks blind to who bought what and at what price.

    UBS was one of the investors who was effected by the glitch. The problem is, they lost over $350 million on the deal. It stems from Nasdaq’s failure to confirm their Facebook trades. Originally they wanted a million shares, but after not getting confirmation, they repeatedly entered their order. Of course, in the end, they ended up with far too many shares–one million for each time they entered their order.

    According to CNBC, UBS is preparing a lawsuit against the Nasdaq for damages stemming from glitch. Officially UBS doesn’t disclose their losses until the end of a financial quarter. They also say they are exploring other options for recouping the funds.

    UBS comments on the loses incurred from Nasdaq trading during Facebook’s IPO launch:

    “Consistent with our policy on market comments on our positions or intra-quarter performance, we are not disclosing the amount of the loss, which is not material to UBS,”

    “We are continuing to consider avenues to recover our losses in this matter, but have not yet taken legal action.”

    Yesterday, the compensation plan devised by Nasdaq was met with huge criticism by big investors who called it a scam and an attempt to turn a confidence eroding event into a competitive advantage. Of course, by now you probably know this is not the first party to take legal action against the Nasdaq for the computer glitch.

    We’ll have to wait and see what happens with all this hubbub caused by the glitch, but I’m not sure the courts will find Nasdaq responsible. I would have thought issues like UBS experienced would have been dealt with by the end of the first day of trading on May 18th. I guess progress is slow. We’ll keep you posted.

  • Facebook Stock Rises after ComScore Finds Ads Work

    Yesterday, ComScore released details of their latest study on Facebook advertising and the news is pretty good. Despite many claims and self-report surveys declaring the ads simply don’t work, research suggests repeated exposure to branded messages, does in fact, impact subsequent purchasing decisions.

    In what could be a strange coincidence, Facebook shares are on the rise again today. Currently stocks are trading $27.28 up from $26.55 this morning. It’s not a monumental increase, and it’s still a far cry from the $38 they were asking on the IPO launch day, but it’s something.

    The results of the ComScore study will be revealed at the upcoming ARF Audience Measurement 7.0 conference in New York next week. Essentially what they found is that prolonged and repeated exposure to brand messages does influence consumer’s attitudes and opinions when it comes time to actually purchase. In other words, exposure to paid Facebook ads does lead users to select one brand over another.

    Along with the study, ComScore will also publish a new white paper entitled, The Power of Like 2: How Social Marketing Works, which features critical new insights on the impact of media exposure. Their press release regarding their latest findings criticizes previous surveys that report on Facebook’s effectiveness, and claim there’s an inherent problem with their methods.

    ComScore comments in their release:

    In this particular case, it appears that the research method used was a survey, which asked users about whether or not they had ever been influenced to purchase as a result of exposure on Facebook. While surveys can be useful in assessing ad effectiveness lifts across attitudinal dimensions such as brand awareness, favorability and purchase intent, people tend not to provide very accurate assessments of their own behavior. And their accuracy in recalling their own behavior over an extended period of time can be especially unreliable. People might be able to accurately tell you how many times they have eaten at a restaurant in the past week, but they would probably do a poor job estimating that number over the past three months.

    This inability to accurately recall past behavior also seems to be evident in another survey response where a higher percentage of Facebook users say they are spending less time on the site today vs. six months ago. comScore’s behavioral measurement of engagement, where time spent on sites is electronically and passively observed, indicates the opposite – that time spent per user is actually up a few percent in that period. In the case of the internet, people spend time doing dozens if not hundreds of things online each day. It is highly unlikely that their recall of the exact sites they visited, the amount of time they spent there or their specific exposure to brand messages will be closely aligned with what actually happened.

    More importantly, people generally don’t like to believe that advertising actually has an effect on their behavior, even though time and time again various forms of advertising research have shown that it does. So, how people respond to a question asking whether or not Facebook advertising (or any other advertising for that matter) has affected their purchase behavior may end up having little correlation with their actual behavior.

    It’s a bit of good news for Facebook and possibly for investors, after all, revenues are pretty much hinged on advertising growth. Is it the reason for their shares increasing in price? I don’t know if we can claim that, but it may factor in. We’ll know a little more next week after ComScore publishes their findings and presents at the conference. We’ll keep you posted.

  • Nasdaq Scrutinized for Facebook IPO Investor Compensation Plan

    Yesterday, Nasdaq announced it was finally making some reparations to investors who were effected by the mysterious computer glitch that plagued Facebook trading the morning of the IPO launch.

    You might recall, they set aside over $40 million in order to handle claims made by larger investment firms who either couldn’t buy, or couldn’t sell at the current market price due to the glitch.

    Well, this proposal to compensate the investors isn’t sitting well with some folks, and they think it’s darn right illegal. William O’Brien, chief executive of Direct Edge Holdings, addressed a conference put on by Sandler O’Neill and Partners, and told them, the Nasdaq compensation plan is a, “shameless attempt to turn a big investor-confidence-eroding event into a competitive advantage. I think Nasdaq’s going to have to go back to the drawing board. We’re going to vigorously object in any form we can“.

    Other investors at the event seemed to agree with O’Brien and shared in his sentiments calling the deal, “a bad idea” and the wrong way to go about correcting the problem. Of course, we all saw this coming. In our coverage yesterday, I raised the question of whether the Nasdaq proposed compensation would spur-on as many lawsuits as the Facebook IPO itself.

    I guess it’s just another thorn in everybody’s side stemming directly from Facebook’s much anticipated, and now notorious, IPO. I’m sure they’re all celebrating, “we finally went public, and now everybody hates us”. As always, we’ll keep you updated on all the shenanigans with the Facebook IPO. Oh yes, I almost forgot, Facebook stock closed at $26.31 today, not really any change to report there.

  • The Facebook IPO and the Silicon Valley Real Estate Market [INFOGRAPHIC]

    While we’re all well aware that Facebook’s IPO has gone less-than-swimmingly for most everyone involved, there could be one metric where the Facebook’s foray into the public has had a upward trending effect.

    Online real-estate company Zillow looked at the data and found that the Silicon Valley housing market is hot – really hot. They looked at the median home values in Menlo Park as well as other areas surrounding it like Palo Alto, Los Altos Hills, and Woodside. They discovered that Silicon Valley home values are not only up to 15x the median home value around the country, but there has been significant movement that ocrrresponds with the Facebook IPO

    Not only that, but in the roughly three-month window between Facebook filing for the IPO and the actual IPO, million-dollar house listings in Menlo Park began to take a larger chunk out of the entire pool – 87% more.

    To put the Silicon Valley housing uptake in perspective, Zillow points out that you could buy roughly 24 homes in Detroit with $1 million. In Menlo Park, $1 million will buy you one 1500 square foot home.

    Check out the full infographic below:

  • Facebook Stock on the Rise as Nasdaq Sets Aside Millions to Compensate Investors

    Good news all the way around for Facebook investors. Despite sluggish trading and constantly declining stock prices, today’s trading took a turn for the better. While trading started out at a record low $25.52, it actually jumped up to over $27 for a short time. The Nasdaq closed with the shares trading at $26.81.

    Also adding to the bright side is Nasdaq’s $40 million they’ve set aside for investment firms who may have gotten screwed by the technical glitch which plagued trading during Facebook’s IPO launch. As you may recall, the glitch left big bank trading desks wondering who bought what and at what price.

    Nasdaq says it will reimburse the firms who either couldn’t sell or couldn’t buy when the price they thought they were paying was available. The delay was only about thirty minutes, but apparently it caused enough confusion to tie up investors until after the market closed.

    Nasdaq will issue the compensation in the form of cash and credits towards fees collected for trading rights on the Nasdaq market. There isn’t any word on how many firms they expected to file claims or if the planned $40 million would be enough to cover all the losses, but it sounds like the process could result in just as many lawsuits as the Facebook IPO itself, which is quite a few.

    As you might recall, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, the Nasdaq, and many of the deals underwriters like Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs have all found themselves facing lawsuits after the IPO launch. Not to mention the events leading up to the IPO have spurred investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Wall Street Regulators, and even Congress. In fact, the Facebook IPO seems to have pissed off everybody, even Facebook users.

    But, Facebook will take all the good news it can get, and rising stock prices and Nasdaq investor compensation sounds pretty good to me. As for the lawsuits, we’ll have to wait to see how they play out. My guess would be that you can’t sue someone over a bad investment anymore than you can sue the state for not buying the winning lottery ticket.

  • Mark Zuckerberg Sued For Unloading Facebook Stock

    Mark Zuckerberg and mega-social media site Facebook have both been in the news quite a bit recently, between the company’s disastrous IPO and the many, many people who are unhappy with it. Now, a class-action lawsuit is being brought against Zuckerberg by some of those unhappy investors, who claim the mogul unloaded a huge amount of stock on inside information that it wasn’t worth its estimated value.

    Zuckerberg is no stranger to legal battles; last year he was sued over a Facebook page that garnered a wave of backlash from the Jewish community, and just a week after the company went public, they were sued for hiding “unfavorable growth forecasts” before the IPO. Oh, and there was that whole Winklevoss scandal.

    This lawsuit, however, could get big very quickly. It claims that JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley all tipped off only the investors with the largest stake in the company about the serious undervalue of the stock well before the IPO, leaving everyone else who invested their hard earned dollars in the dust. As of Monday morning, shares had fallen to around $26.00 apiece, far below the initial $38.00 projected value.

    Former Wall Street analyst Henry Blodget spoke up on behalf of investors, calling the insider trading allegations “absurd and unfair.” He goes on to say that the SEC should change their rules about such information being shared, asserting that every investor has the right to know what’s going on with the IPO.

    “This is an absurd and unfair practice,” he said. “The estimates themselves are material information–the consensus of smart, well-trained analysts who have worked with the company’s management to develop realistic forecasts. Most investors don’t even know that these estimates exist, let alone that they’re whispered verbally to only a handful of big investors. All potential investors should have easy access to these estimates, as well as to any logic underlying them. The SEC needs to change the rules here.”

    While the exact amount of Zuckerberg’s sold shares isn’t known, rumors put it around a billion dollars, and that adds up to a lot of angry stockholders. There have been accusations that Zuckerberg himself is to blame for the disastrous IPO on the grounds that he is an egomaniac who allowed the company to offer inflated projections in order to justify Facebook’s $100 billion valuation. That, in turn, leads many people back to the idea that Facebook will be struggling in the years to come and may fall off or disappear completely within the next five years.

    Speculation on Facebook’s staying power has been a topic of conversation practically since the company was founded, especially since there are so many competing social media sites. And while Facebook has grown exponentially with the help of advertising and incorporating their brand into other sites via login links, they have sadly neglected their mobile app. That, says Ironfire Capital’s Eric Jackson, could prove to be their downfall.

    Facebook has acknowledged the glitch in their Matrix, even stating in their IPO filing that if users continue to choose mobile devices over PCs for their Facebooking needs, it will negatively affect the company because they can’t keep up with demands. That acknowledgement may not bode well for the company in light of this lawsuit, and it begs the question of whether or not insider trading was indeed an issue right before the IPO. Did Zuckerberg use that information for his own gain and bail while he still could? What does he know that we don’t?

    The fact that the company’s head honcho took off on a honeymoon right after the stocks began to tank isn’t sitting well with investors, either. Since he’s been traveling with his new bride, Zuckerberg hasn’t had time to comment on this latest news and what it might mean for his company, but it looks like this case could get nasty pretty quickly as the very people who are supporting Facebook are demanding answers and accountability from its owner.

    RT @AskKissy LOL. Mark got over.. Aren’t you glad you couldn’t afford to buy the stock? http://t.co/mmDLvsoT
    2 minutes ago via UberSocial for Android · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    When are people going to realize Zuckerberg is a horrible person? “Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Banks Sued Over IPO” http://t.co/wJIwuKEN
    27 minutes ago via Tweetbot for iOS · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

    I guess someone is having a more stressful day than me…Mark Zuckerberg Sued For Unloading Facebook Stock #WebProNews http://t.co/LyD1A4Ip
    46 minutes ago via Tweet Button · powered by @socialditto
     Reply  · Retweet  · Favorite

  • Could Twitter be Acquired by Google in Light of Facebook IPO Fallout?

    Could Twitter be acquired by Google? It seems like a rather outlandish idea, but thanks to the recent flop by Facebook in their efforts to go public, smaller internet companies like Twitter may find acquisition by an established giant like Google to be an attractive offer. In fact, Google’s mergers and acquisition team has been mulling over the idea for some time.

    While Twitter may not be ready to go public in its current capacity, it doesn’t look to be far off either. On the other hand, the Facebook IPO should be a sharp reminder that success is not only in the eye of the beholder. According to Business Insider, both parties, Twitter and Google, may be open to the idea of an acquisition.

    Twitter has some serious work left to do with securing ad revenues and illustrating performance before it can sell itself to shareholders. So maybe the safety of Google would be a better choice, and a faster route to success. Business Insider actually raises some very pertinent arguments in their coverage on the subject, here’s how they summarized the whole affair:

    * It’s becoming obvious that Twitter’s business model will be ads in users Twitter streams, targeted through contextual matching – something that Google is better at than anybody.

    * Twitter cofounder and executive chairman Jack Dorsey is spending less time at the company again, prefering to work on his other company, Square. That leaves a professional, non-founding CEO Dick Costolo in charge – one who has already sold a company to Google once in his career. Why wouldn’t he do it again?

    * Google organizes the Web for desktops, through pull. Twitter organizes the Web for mobile, through push. The Internet will be mostly mobile by the end of the decade.

    We’ll have to wait to see if there’s any substance to this speculation, but it would make a great deal of sense, and be a powerful partnership, if Twitter were to be acquired by Google. If both parties are willing, it could just be a matter of time and logistics.

  • Nasdaq Hopes to Appease Facebook Investors with Modest Compensation

    The Nasdaq OMX Group hopes to make up for that small-but-disastrous glitch on the day of Facebook’s initial public offering by compensating affected investors who were trying to get in on the early trading. According to the Wall Street Journal, the exchange organization has been notifying brokers that it plans to submit the proper filings tomorrow in order to begin the process of compensating investors.

    Nasdaq’s technical fumble delayed the IPO for about half an hour and left brokers wondering whether or not their trades had actually been confirmed. Some of those traders didn’t find out until hours later whether their purchases went through, which was well after it was starting to look like Facebook’s stock was stalling.

    Today’s new low for Facebook shares, $25.75, likely only adds kindling to the fiery anger felt by brokers who were unexpectedly and unwittingly left holding Facebook shares that they likely wouldn’t have kept if they’d have known what the actual fate of their share purchases were.

    Nasdaq OMX plans to use roughly $10.7 million that was gained from the organization’s “own unexpected position in Facebook shares” in addition to the standing $3 million cap on compensation reserved for exchange customers negatively affected by system outages. That may be about as far as Nasdaq cares to go in ameliorating the toxic situation investors find themselves in, though, because if the group doles out much more than that it could start to eat into their profits. That seems like shoddy, selfish math guaranteed to prolong the bitter taste in the mouths of investors should that $13 million not cover the losses suffered by investors.

    And bitter they may continue to be, as the Journal points out that total losses suffered on behalf of retail investors lost more than $100 million due to the craptastic Facebook IPO. Nasdaq might want to start brokering some peace with investors tomorrow, but paying out only a tenth of what was lost because of Facebook’s IPO errors likely won’t appease too many investors.

  • Facebook Stocks Finds New Low at $25.75

    Facebook Stocks Finds New Low at $25.75

    It seems like everyday marks a new low for the folks over at Facebook. Today, stock prices slipped below the $26 mark to $25.75. Considering shares started out at $38, I would say the IPO has lost almost all of its momentum. But, perhaps it speaks to the climate on Wall Street overall.

    Groupon also experienced record low stock prices earlier this week. Their shares slipped below $10 just as the lockup period from their IPO expired. Shareholders seemed eager to dump their stake in the company as their quarterly performance almost always disappoints and the value of the shares has never even approximated the price most investors paid during the IPO. In fact, their market capitalization just sunk below the $6 billion Google offered them a couple years ago to buy them out.

    Of course there’s more to Facebook’s bad news than just falling stock prices. The social media platform and its underwriters are facing a huge onslaught of lawsuits stemming from a number of issues surrounding their IPO. The first, and most prominent of those issues being a revised revenue forecast which conveniently only found its way into big investor’s hands despite being released almost ten days before the IPO.

    Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and the biggest underwriters in the IPO like Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs all face lawsuits brought forth by investors in California, New York, Massachusetts, and the list seems to grow larger everyday. I dare say it’s trendy to sue Facebook these days.

    Aside from lawsuits, Facebook’s IPO has also been the launching point for several investigations. Interested parties include Wall Street Regulators, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Congress. For various reasons, they are all taking a closer look at Facebook and their actions leading up to the IPO.

    So Facebook shares are not doing good, and it sounds like the executives aren’t doing much better. While the networking site is just as popular as ever, we have to wonder if this IPO nonsense is just the first step into major decline for the company. We’ll keep you posted as new information comes in about Facebook shares, Wall Street trading, new IPO lawsuits and/or big bank scandals.

  • Facebook Will Lose Dominance and “Disappear” Before 2020, Says Analyst

    The catastrophe better known as Facebook’s falling stock prices is a strong foreboding of the company’s relatively imminent exit from the internet’s grownup table, according to one analyst. Today, Ironfire Capital’s Eric Jackson told CNBC’s Squawk on the Street that Facebook will “disappear in the way the Yahoo has disappeared” within the next 5 to 8 years.

    Jacksons big reason behind this projection? Facebook’s struggle to monetize their mobile app.

    This idea isn’t new, and it isn’t disputed by Facebook. Prior to going public, Facebook amended its IPO filing to reflect these concerns:

    We do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the use of Facebook mobile products, and our ability to do so successfully is unproven. We believe this increased usage of Facebook on mobile devices has contributed to the recent trend of our daily active users increasing more rapidly than the increase in the number of ads delivered. If users increasingly access Facebook mobile products as a substitute for access through personal computers, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our mobile users, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected.

    Shortly after Facebook’s stock price began to tank, a class-action lawsuit was filed that accused the company of concealing “a severe and pronounced reduction” in revenue growth predictions dealing with mobile:

    “Facebook was then experiencing a severe and pronounced reduction in revenue growth due to an increase of users of its Facebook app or website through mobile devices rather than a traditional PC such that the Company told the Underwriter Defendants to materially lower their revenue forecasts for 2012,” said the lawsuit.

    It went on to accuse Facebook (and Morgan Stanley) of failure to disclose this information prior to the IPO.

    So, with Facebook’s mobile quandary on his mind, Jackson goes on to explain that Facebook is in a generation of web companies focused on the social web. He says that the next generation of companies are ones focused predominantly on monetizing mobile – and that Facebook will have a hard time doing that.

    “The world is moving faster, it’s getting more competitive, not less, and I think those who are dominant in their prior generation are really going to have a hard time moving into this newer generation,” he said. “Facebook can buy a bunch of mobile companies, but they are still a big, fat website and that’s different from a mobile app.”

    Remember, Facebook currently has over 900 million users and is an undisputed heavyweight online. Could they lose their seat at the table within the next decade? Can you really imagine a world where Facebook isn’t a huge player? Despite the aforementioned challenges, it’s hard to imagine Facebook dropping that far in just five years. But who knows? The world of web companies is volatile and unpredictable and even a giant like Facebook isn’t immune to fluctuations, as we are all well aware.

    Could Facebook “disappear” in the next few years? Let us know what you think in the comments.