WebProNews

Tag: Domains

  • GoDaddy Readies For New TLDs With Afternic Acquisition

    GoDaddy announced on Thursday that it has acquired domain name aftermarket company Afternic as it prepares for new TLDs. The company will keep Afternic’s staff in the Boston Area.

    GoDaddy CEO Blake Irving had this to say: “Having the right domain name is vital, no matter your venture. GoDaddy is working to bring the ‘domain aftermarket’ together with new registrations and make both super-simple to access. Our customers need an easy way to buy the name they want, regardless of whether it’s new or has been registered previously. This acquisition forms a registrar-led process that creates faster and more trusted transactions across the board.”

    The company says the acquisition bolsters ICANN’s upcoming TLD program with Afternic’s Domain Listing Service (DLS) including names at over 100 different registrars (including 18 of the top-20).

    “The success of the new TLDs and the aftermarket relies on a tight-knit group of diverse registrars and Afternic has done tremendous work to bring everyone together,” said GoDaddy Vice President and General Manager Mike McLaughlin.

    Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

    GoDaddy is also acquiring domain parking service SmartName and NameFind, a service aimed at helping entrepreneurs find brand names for their businesses. GoDaddy says NameMedia will continue to operate its BuyDomains.com marketplace and website development group, and CEO Kelly Conlin will remain in the role, while also becoming a strategic advisor to the Afternic management team.

    Image: Afternic

  • Demand Media Gets New SVP Of Technology For United TLD

    Demand Media announced on Wednesday that it has appointed recent hire Wayne MacLaurin to Senior Vice President of Technology for United TLD, a subsidiary of the company.

    The company says United TLD is investing in infrastructure to become a leader in the new gTLD space. With his new role, MacLaurin is responsible for managing the technology roadmap and day-to-day operation of the registry systems.

    “We’re thrilled to welcome Wayne to the Demand Media team in his new role,” said Taryn Naidu, executive vice president of Demand Media’s Domain Services business. “As a former colleague, I know Wayne possesses a rare combination of leadership, technical prowess and business acumen. He gets things done, without cutting corners, and has built an excellent reputation in our industry through his technical contributions in the ICANN community and beyond.”

    MacLaurin was most recently CTO at Sedari, a registry consulting and outsourcing service. He has also served as CTO of the Momentous Group of Companies, a domain name marketing services group from Canada.

    From 2010 to 2012, MacLaurin served as Executive Director of the Domain Name System Operations Analysis and Research Center.

    During a recent earnings call, Demand Media said it was still on track to have its media and domain businesses split by the end of the year or early next year.

    Image: Wayne MacLaurin (Twitter)

  • Say Goodbye To GoDaddy Girls And Hello To ‘Ass-Kicking’ Small Businesses

    If you haven’t seen it yet, GoDaddy has a new ad out, and it stars Jean-Claude Van Damme. Yes, that Jean-Claude Van Damme. Why are we telling you about this? Well, it’s not just a commercial. It’s significant because it’s the first step in a big shift in branding strategy from the company that has generated a great deal of controversy over the years, including from its ads themselves. Earlier this year, they were dubbed “tasteless” by Forbes.

    GoDaddy is the top domain registrar in the world by far, according to ICANN, so the company obviously has a direct link with a whole lot of businesses. Abandoning the scantily clad women strategy, GoDaddy is turning things around and focusing on businesses. Small businesses.

    What do you think of GoDaddy’s ads? Do you prefer the old strategy or the new one? Like both strategies? Neither? Let us know in the comments.

    Here’s a look at the top ICANN registrars worldwide (via webhosting.info):

    Top ICANN Registrars

    How much of that do you think is a result of the company’s marketing efforts? How often do you see television commercials for any of these other registrars? GoDaddy, regardless of what you think of its past commercials, has clearly been quite effective in its marketing endeavors. If nothing else, the Super Bowl ad spots always got people talking (even if perhaps more so in earlier years).

    Well, GoDaddy wants to keep people talking about its ads, even if it’s trying a different strategy. Here’s the latest spot in case you haven’t seen it (it ran multiple times during Thursday night’s NFL season opener).

    While it does feature an abundance of Van Damme spreading his legs in classic Van Damme fashion, there is a clear business focus here. The commercial is about a baker, and it ends on the message: “More Business. More Ready. It’s go time.”

    The company tells us this is the beginning of a major launch in new brand strategy targeting small businesses.

    The “It’s go time” line Van Damme says at the end of the ad is a new company-wide “messaging transformation,” GoDaddy says.

    Van Damme

    “This is the radical shift we knew we had to make and it’s more than just marketing,” said GoDaddy CEO Blake Irving. “A brand is a promise to our customers and a commitment to understand their needs. Our mission is to ‘fight the good fight for the go getter’ … the small business owner … or anyone who labors for the love of it and wants the benefits of the latest technology without having to be an expert.”

    Irving took over as CEO of GoDaddy in January, and according to the company, there has been “an intense focus on products and personnel” since he did. The company has acquired talent and executives from Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, eBay and Intuit. It also recently acquired M.dot and Locu, both for its website creation tool efforts.

    Along with the new marketing strategy, GoDaddy has unveiled a new site design and interface with a streamlined checkout process, and has re-built its Website Builder product. They’ve also put out this video of people talking about the tool:

    Notice that none of the women are taking their clothes off.

    On the shift in advertising approach, GoDaddy says Van Damme represents the “ass-kicker inside every small business owner,” and the ad is one of two that people will see on TV (it will debut during the NFL season-opener on NBC tonight).

    “This is definitely different for us, but you’ll see we still have a sense of humor,” said GoDaddy Chief Marketing Officer Barb Rechterman. “We think Jean-Claude is hilarious. ‘The muscles from Brussels’ certainly helps make the commercial memorable, but the story also illustrates the struggles and time constraints many small business owners face every day. Our job is ‘to be there’ for these small business owners who want to attract more customers with beautiful websites that are easy to create and affordable to maintain.”

    GoDaddy has also released a “Manifesto of Kick Ass” for small businesses:

    Again, nobody taking their clothes off.

    The company says the new strategy comes after “months of intensive research, customer segmentation, customer surveys and employee input.”

    Will it pay off? Is the right direction for GoDaddy’s brand strategy? Let us know what you think.

  • Jean-Claude Van Damme Spreads His Legs For New GoDaddy Small Business Ad

    GoDaddy knows how to advertise to get people’s attention. If there’s one thing the company is known for outside of domains, it’s that.

    For years, the company has run ads (including many Super Bowl ads) with the “sex sells” angle. Now, in what a spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews is a “permanent shift” away from the GoDaddy girls to a new strategy, they have tapped screen legend Jean-Claude Van Damme to spread his legs (in true Jean-Claude Van Damme fashion) to sell the “More business. More ready.” angle.

    Brace yourself.

    Van Damme

    Van Damme

    Van Damme

    Van Damme

    Van Damme

    The ad kicks off a new brand strategy the company is launching, targeting small businesses.

    The “It’s go time” line Van Damme says at the end of the ad is a new company-wide “messaging transformation,” GoDaddy says.

    “This is the radical shift we knew we had to make and it’s more than just marketing,” said GoDaddy CEO Blake Irving. “A brand is a promise to our customers and a commitment to understand their needs. Our mission is to ‘fight the good fight for the go getter’ … the small business owner … or anyone who labors for the love of it and wants the benefits of the latest technology without having to be an expert.”

    GoDaddy is also unveiling a new website design and interface with a “streamlined” checkout process and a re-built Website Builder product.

    On the shift in advertising approach, GoDaddy says Van Damme represents the “ass-kicker inside every small business owner,” and the ad is one of two that people will see on TV (it will debut during the NFL season-opener on NBC tonight).

    “This is definitely different for us, but you’ll see we still have a sense of humor,” said GoDaddy Chief Marketing Officer Barb Rechterman. “We think Jean-Claude is hilarious. ‘The muscles from Brussels’ certainly helps make the commercial memorable, but the story also illustrates the struggles and time constraints many small business owners face every day. Our job is ‘to be there’ for these small business owners who want to attract more customers with beautiful websites that are easy to create and affordable to maintain.”

    Here’s GoDaddy’s “Manifesto of Kick Ass”:

    According to the company, the new strategy comes after “months of intensive research, customer segmentation, customer surveys and employee input,” and since Irving took over as CEO early this year, there has been “an intense focus on products and personnel”.

    Indeed, the company has gained talent and senior leaders from Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, eBay and Intuit, and acquired start-ups M.dot and Locu.

    Images: GoDaddy (YouTube)

  • Google Talks Geotargeting And Generic ccTLDs

    Google’s latest Webmaster Help video deals with ccTLDs and geotargeting – specifically Google’s view of a developer grabbing a ccTLD that is generally associated with a country they’re not actually in. Here’s the exact question:

    As memorable .COM domains become more expensive, more developers are choosing alternate new domains like .IO and .IM – which Google geotargets to small areas. Do you discourage this activity?

    “I want you to go in with your eyes open,” Google’s Matt Cutts responds. “Because you can pick any domain you want, but if you pick a domain like .ES or .IT because you think you can make a novelty domain like GOOGLE.IT (‘Google It’), you know, or something like that, be aware that most domains at a country level do pertain to that specific country, and so we think that that content is going to be intended mainly for that country.”

    He does note that there are some ccTLDs that are more generic like .IO, which stands for Indian Ocean, but there are “very few” domains that are actually relevant to that. A lot of startups were using it, and it was something that was more applicable to the entire world, he says. For reasons like this, Google periodically reviews the list of ccTLDs, looking for things that are in wider use around the world. This way, it can view sites with these domains as more generic.

    Here’s a list of the domains Google considers generic.

    Cutts talked about this topic in another video earlier this year, specifically responding to the question:

    We have a vanity domain (http://ran.ge) that unfortunately isn’t one of the generic TLDs, which means we can’t set our geographic target in Webmaster Tools. Is there any way to still target our proper location?

    You can see his response to that one here.

    On a semi-related note, last week, WordPress.com started letting users register .CO domains.

  • WordPress.com Now Lets Users Register .CO Domains

    Automattic announced today that it has added .CO as a new top-level domain option for WordPress.com users. This joins other options like .ME, .COM, .NET, and .ORG. It will cost you $25 a year for a .CO domain.

    To register for a .CO domain, go to Store and Domains in the dashboard, and type in the .CO domain you wish to register in the “Add a Domain” field.

    Add a domain

    After that, it will ask you for more details, such as contact info, and if you want to add Private Registration to the purchase (an additional $8), then you will register the domain, and make your payment. Once you go through all of that, you’ll activate it by going to Store and Domains in the dashboard, and selecting the button next to the domain, and clicking “Update Primary Domain.”

    According to Automattic, over 1.5 million .CO domain names have been registered in over 200 countries since 2010.

  • Google: You Probably Shouldn’t Link Your 20 Domains Together

    You know how Google has everybody afraid of links? People are also afraid to link to their own stuff in certain ways, and Google’s Webmaster Help video today pretty much indicates that this is with good reason.

    If you have a bunch of domains, you need to be careful about linking them to each other, because Google’s not a fan. Matt Cutts took on the following question in the video:

    Should a customer with 20 domain names link it all together or not, and if he links it should he add nofollow to the links not to pass PageRank?

    “Well first off, why do you have 20 domain names?” Cutts begins. “You know, if it’s all ‘CheapOnlineCasinos’ or “MedicalMalpracticeInOhio,’ you know, that sort of stuff, having 20 domain names there can look pretty spammy, and I probably would not link them all together. On the other hand, if you have 20 domain names and they’re all versions of your domain in different countries, right – Google.co.za, Google.fr, Google.de – that sort of thing, then it can make a lot of sense to have some way to get to one version of the domain to a different version.”

    “But even then,” he adds. “I probably wouldn’t link all the domains even in the footer, all by themselves, because that’s a little bit strange. I’d probably have one link to a country locator page, which might even be on domain.com, and you might have flags or something like that, so there are ways to get to those other domains. And as long as there’s a good way for users to get there, then search engines will be able to follow those links as well. Just make sure that they’re normal static HTML links, and we’ll be able to follow, and the PageRank will flow, and all of that sort of thing. So if there’s a really good reason for users to do it – maybe you could have a dropdown where you could pick your country or something like that – then it might make sense.”

    “But having the country top-level domains is one of the only areas where I can think of where you’d really need to have twenty different domains,” says Cutts. “In theory, you might have a blog network, but even then, you know, I’ve seen very large blog networks, and you’ve got that footer at the bottom that has a lot of unrelated domains, and at some point it gets pretty big. Even then, you’d probably only have like ten domains, and maybe a few posts on each domain that are linking to each other, so at the point where you have 20, unless there’s a really good reason, I would be a little bit leery of just doing some massive cross-linking scheme between all of them.”

    So it appears that even if you’re not trying to “scheme” per se, Google might view it as a scheme, if you link your own web properties together in a way that it doesn’t like. Of course, there’s always nofollow.

  • Demand Media Announces Designs.com Platform For gTLDs

    Demand Media Announces Designs.com Platform For gTLDs

    Demand Media announced that later this year, it will launch Designs.com, as the new gTLDs become available. The site will feature a platform to create designs for sites utilizing the new domain extensions.

    “The goal is to have easy ways for folks who have registered a new gTLD to quickly find categorized templates and tools for building a website,” a spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews.

    New Designs.com sites will be included with the registration of the domain extensions, such as .dentist and .social. Designs.com will be integrated into the purchase process of partnering domain and web hosting providers.

    “A consumer using .FAN needs features related to sharing, ‘liking’ and growing a community, while a professional using .ARCHITECT needs features related to a strong visual portfolio and self-promotion,” says Nick Nelson, GM of Designs.com. “Until today, tools and templates have been designed for no-one in particular. New gTLDs are for specific audiences, so we must have tools that create a web presence with the same tailored approach, making the website and web address inseparable.”

    Designs.com will feature a point-and-click design tool, and customers can see right away how their site will look on mobile devices. It will also include access to drag-and-drop social media tools.

    You can see the introductory video here.

  • Google Updates Indexing To Treat TLDs Differently

    Google has been updating its indexing systems to treat some TLDs differently than in the past. Some country-code TLDs are being treated as generic TLDs.

    The list, which may still change more over time, of generic country code TLDs is as follows: .ad, .as, .bz, .cc, .cd, .co, .dj, .fm, .gg, .io, .la, .me, .ms, .nu, .sc, .sr, .su, .tv, .tk and .ws.

    Google’s Pierre Far shared the news in a Google+ post (via Search Engine Roundtable).

    Pierre Far

    Expanded list of ccTLDs treated as Generic ccTLDs

    Over the past few months, we've been updating our indexing systems to treat certain country country-code TLDs as generic TLDs; that is, even though the top-level domain has a country code, we would treat it, by default, as not targeting a specific country. Now that all the pieces are in place, we also updated our Help Center article listing the TLDs we treat as gTLDs:

    http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1347922

    The latest addition includes the quite-popular (and personal favorite 🙂 ) .io.


    Geotargetable domains – Webmaster Tools Help
    Generic top-level domains (gTLDs) don’t target specific countries. If your site has a generic top-level domain, such as .com, .org, or any of the domains listed below, and targets users in a particula…

    Google’s Matt Cutts recently did a Webmaster Help video discussing location and ccTLDs. If you’re reading this article, you might find it helpful. You can get the gist of it in text if you click the link, in case you don’t feel like sitting through the two-and-a-half-minute video.

  • The Pirate Bay Moves To The Caribbean To Avoid Domain Seizure

    Last week, The Pirate Bay moved to Iceland’s .is domain in hopes of escaping the ever watchful eye of the entertainment industry and its army of lawyers. It seemed that the infamous site would be safe for at least a while, but that has turned out not to be the case.

    TorrentFreak reports that The Pirate Bay has moved yet again. Those looking for the site will now be directed to a .sx domain. The .sx TLD belongs to the small island nation of Sint Maarten, a constituent country owned by both The Netherlands and France.

    So, what prompted the move to a new domain? It seems that the Swedish authorities have finally moved to take the .se domain that The Pirate Bay operated under for over a year. While they were at it, the authorities also filed a motion to seize the .is domain that The Pirate Bay recently moved to last week.

    The folks behind The Pirate Bay saw this coming earlier this year, and have long since vacated the .se domain. Those visiting the site’s .se domain will be redirected to the new .sx domain though. If the authorities are successful in seizing the domain, those visiting the .se or .is domains will no longer be automatically redirected to whichever home The Pirate Bay decides to move to.

    Of course, this latest development might bring a novel legal fight to the forefront as Sweden argues it has jurisdiction over the .is domain because it’s owned by a Swedish national. The company that operates the .is domain – INSIC – told TorrentFreak that Sweden’s argument may not hold much weight in court because the domain is still owned by INSIC, an Icelandic company subject only to Icelandic laws.

    In short, The Pirate Bay might get to keep the its .is domain if Sweden’s jurisdiction argument doesn’t hold up in court. Even if it does, The Pirate Bay can fall back on its new .sx domain. If that fails, The Pirate Bay still has hundreds of TLDs in which it can fall back on. Like I said last year, The Pirate Bay is in a war of attrition and it’s winning.

  • Google On Buying Spammy Domains: Don’t Be The Guy Left Holding The Bag

    In the latest Webmaster Help video from Google, Matt Cutts takes on an interesting topic. Can you buy a domain that has been penalized by Google for spam, clean it up and recover rankings?

    Well, it depends, and Cutts explains why.

    “This is a tricky question because on the one hand there’s algorithmic spam, and then there’s manual spam, and all manual spam does have an eventual time out, so if you were to completely clean up all the content on the domain, [and] do a reconsideration request, in theory, that domain can recover,” says Cutts. “However, on the algorithmic side, if there are a ton of spammy links that the previous owner built up, that can be a little bit hard to go through, and try to clean up and get all those links taken down, and make a list of all those links.”

    He continues, “The way to think about it is, there are a lot of spammers out there that do basically what’s known as a ‘churn and burn’ tactic, where they just use as many techniques to try and make a domain rank as they can, and then as soon as that domain is awful or bad, or Google has caught it, then they sort of movie on, and they go on to some other exploit, and they try to tackle it with another domain. Now what you don’t want to do is be the guy who gets caught left holding the bag.”

    Long story short: how bad do you really want this domain?

  • Google Kills Blocked Sites Feature

    About two years ago, when Google was in the early stages of the Panda update, it launched another means of helping users get more quality results in front of them. This one, unlike the Panda update, left it more up to the users, giving them more control of their own. That was the domain blocking feature.

    The feature has now been killed. Late last year, people were noticing that the feature wasn’t working. Now, Google has officially acknowledged its demise.Google says in a message on its Inside Search site (via Search Engine Roundtable):

    The Blocked Sites feature is no longer available. To block particular sites from your search results, we recommend the Personal Blocklist Chrome extension from Google. You may also download your existing blocked sites list as a text file.

    Google doesn’t offer much in the way of explanation as to why they killed the feature. Most likely, it wasn’t being used a whole lot, and really, isn’t the feature kind of an admission that Google is not getting results right?

    At least for those who want to continue blocking sites, Google provides an alternative. That’s more that Google Reader users got.

  • RSS.com Is Now for Sale with a $200K Asking Price

    If you’re the owner of RSS.com, there’s probably no better time than now to try and sell it.

    On the heels of Google’s decision to kill their popular Google Reader RSS feed product and the outrage spawned by that decision, Ron Sheridan is trying to sell RSS.com. The asking price? $200,000.

    He initially acquired the doman for $125,000.

    The sale is being brokered by WebsiteBrokerage.com, who also represents brand.com, geo.org, and haircare.com

    RSS.com still boasts its plans, which is to “launch a high quality RSS reader, married to a crowd sourced, crowd curated RSS feed directory.”

    They says that this “community approach will allow users to drill down to top subject matter content and experts quickly and efficiently.”

    That plans never really worked out for Sheridan, and now he’s looking to sell.

    With Google Reader on the way out, there’s now a giant void that must be filled (unless you think RSS is dead). Digg has announced plans to build their own Reader replacement. Existing feed readers like Feedly and Newsblur are looking to capitalize on the many Google Reader users looking for an alternative. Will someone step up and bring RSS.com’s plans to life? 200 large is a pretty hefty asking price, but who knows?

    [via The Next Web]

  • Demand Media Announces Domain Business HQ In Dublin

    Demand Media announced today that it is opening its largest international office in Dublin, which will serve as the company’s international headquarters for its domain business.

    Last month, the company announced that it intends to split its content and domain businesses apart.

    Demand Media’s international presence currently includes offices in Toronto, Buenos Aires and London. The company says the Dublin team is focused on preparing for the big new TLD push, which will come to market this year.

    “We are excited to expand our business into the thriving tech scene of Dublin,” said Demand Media EVP of emerging markets, Dave Panos. “At such an exhilarating time in the domain services industry with the upcoming launch of new TLDs, we are eager to recruit creative and high-energy professionals who are up to the challenge of taking the lead in the changing Internet landscape.”

    The Dublin operation will be led by the newly hired David Ryan from Electronic Arts.

    “With his experience creating efficiencies inside of large operations, identifying and participating in high-growth markets, and creating value within smaller start up environments, David Ryan is certain to lead our Demand Media Dublin team to success in a new market,” continued Panos. “Our ramped up efforts internationally further illustrate Demand Media’s commitment to this historic TLD launch.”

    Ryan served as senior director at EA.

    In other news, Demand Media announced on Tuesday that it has acquired e-learning content site Creativebug, which it says will cater to the Etsy and Pinterest crowds.

  • Matt Cutts Talks Location And ccTLDs

    In Google’s latest Webmaster Help video, Matt Cutts discusses location and ccTLDs. Specifically, he responds to the following user-submitted question:

    We have a vanity domain (http://ran.ge) that unfortunately isn’t one of the generic TLDs, which means we can’t set our geographic target in Webmaster Tools. Is there any way to still target our proper location?

    “We’ve seen this trend – as the domain name space gets a little more exhausted in .com, people get creative, and so Matt Mullenweg at WordPress grabbed ma.tt, for example, which is a really creative URL, but something that people don’t think about is: what is .tt? Or what is .ge?” says Cutts. “It’s Georgia, you know, there’s a lot of startups that have been using .io, which is the TLD for the Indian Ocean, I believe. So you have to think hard about is it the case that this is going to be known as an international area? If your’e just using .es because you can find some cool word that ends in .es, most people using that domain are targeting Spain. So that is our assumption – that you’re targeting Spain.”

    He says that some people want .li to be associated with Long Island, but it’s really associated with Lichtenstein, and that’s how Google views it.

    “In some sense, it comes down to a little bit of a call about when a domain becomes truly generic. When it becomes appropriate for the entire world. So .co, which used to be, I think, Columbia, might be more generic now, where everybody’s using it as if it is another .com, but some domains, I would put some thought into. Just because it’s a cool URL, a lot of the times we’re going to be looking at it and thinking, ‘Hmm, this is actually related more to Lichtenstein that it is to Long Island, and so even though people want to do a Long Island business, we’re more likely to think that it’s in Lichtenstein.”

    He goes on to suggest that you post on Webmaster forums and “rally your case,” and do a blog post that says, “.iO is mostly startups, and this should not be related to this country…” Still, he says, Google has to look at the data and look at the domains that are in use, and make a judgment call.

  • Demand Media To Split Into Two Public Companies, Earnings Released

    Demand Media announced today that its board of directors has authorized a plan for the company to explore separating into two separate public companies – one for its media business and one for its domain business.

    CEO Richard Rosenblatt said, “Both businesses have grown to become leaders in their respective markets, and we now want to provide additional operational and strategic flexibility to drive sustainable growth. We believe a separation will position each business to better pursue its specific strategic priorities and vision, as well as improve transparency for investors and enable the capital markets to better assess each company’s value, performance and potential.”

    “We intend to appropriately capitalize both companies to pursue their distinct growth opportunities, such as the upcoming launch of new generic Top Level Domains that is a transformative event for our domain services business, as well as further diversifying our content offerings in our media business,” he added.

    Demand Media expects a potential transaction to come within the next nine to twelve months. In the meantime, the company will work with outside advisers to develop plans for the the board’s further consideration and approval.

    The company also just released its Q4 and Fiscal 2012 financial results.

    On the earnings call, Rosenblatt said the company intends to increase its investment in its people, its content production, and its gTLD initiative. On the content side of things, it will evolve its content production arm (Demand Studios), and expects to double its investment in content this year, further develop its algorithm, add additional quality improvements (like those that helped it achieve recovery from the Panda update), and expand production capabilities.

    The company will also increase distribution by expanding its partner network, which doubled revenues in 2012. Rosenblatt says he expects its revenues to double again this year.

    They’re also planning on launching eHow in two more countries this year (after launching in Germany in Q4).

    Rosenblatt says they’ll diversify into new content models, and will expand beyond their core ad-driven model with new paid opportunities including subscription video and elearning content.

    On the gTLD front, he noted that Amazon and Google were the biggest players, and that their participation will lead to a bigger market for everyone.

    Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout last year, and was ranked at number 13 in January, according to comScore. The company reached over 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January, and eHow (which was once famously hit by Google’s Panda update) was ranked number 12 in the U.S. with 62 million unique visitors in January.

    “We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,” said Rosenblatt. “We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.”

    “As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off,” he added. “If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.”

    Here’s the earnings release in its entirety:

    SANTA MONICA, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Feb. 19, 2013– Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD), a leading digital media and domain services company, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

    “We finished the year on a high note, posting record fourth quarter results and completing our fifth consecutive year of record revenue and Adjusted EBITDA,” saidRichard Rosenblatt, Chairman and CEO of Demand Media. “We improved content quality and diversified our distribution channels by successfully revamping our content platform in 2012, and are now prepared to significantly increase our content investments in 2013. In addition, we became a leader in the generic Top Level Domain opportunity, due to substantial investments we made in 2012. We plan to increase this investment ahead of the expected launch later this year.”

    Rosenblatt added: “As a result of these two different growth opportunities, we also announced today that our Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of our business into two independent publicly-traded companies via a tax-free spin-off. If approved, the separation will facilitate better operational and strategic flexibility, enabling each business to focus on its distinct priorities and growth opportunities.”

    Financial Summary
    In millions, except per share amounts
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 Change 2011 2012 Change
    Total Revenue $ 84.4 $ 103.1 22% $ 324.9 $ 380.6 17%
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 49.9 $ 62.3 25% $ 193.0 $ 227.0 18%
    Registrar Revenue 31.4 34.5 10% 119.4 134.2 12%
    Total Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 81.3 $ 96.8 19% $ 312.4 $ 361.1 16%
    Income (loss) from Operations $ (4.8 ) $ 6.1 NA $ (13.1 ) $ 8.7 NA
    Adjusted EBITDA(1) $ 23.7 $ 29.4 24% $ 86.0 $ 103.4 20%
    Net income (loss) $ (6.4 ) $ 4.7 NA $ (18.5 ) $ 6.2 NA
    Adjusted net income(1) $ 6.8 $ 10.8 60% $ 21.9 $ 34.3 57%
    EPS – diluted $ (0.08 ) $ 0.05 NA $ (0.27 ) $ 0.07 NA
    Adjusted EPS(1) $ 0.08 $ 0.12 50% $ 0.25 $ 0.39 56%
    Cash Flow from Operations $ 27.2 $ 26.0 (4)% $ 85.3 $ 91.0 7%
    Free Cash Flow(1)(2) $ 18.3 $ 17.1 (7)% $ 19.5 $ 62.3 219%
     
    (1) These non-GAAP financial measures are described below and reconciled to their comparable GAAP measures in the accompanying tables. Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA.
    Reconciliations for both measures are available on the investor relations section of the Company’s website.
    (2) In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in generic Top Level Domain (“gTLD”) applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.

    Q4 2012 Financial Summary:

    • Content & Media revenue ex-TAC grew 25% year-over-year, driven by 24% page view growth on the Company’s owned & operated properties as well as 37% growth in network RPMs ex-TAC, reflecting higher revenue from network content partners.
    • Registrar revenue grew 10% year-over-year, driven by an increase in the number of domains on our platform, due primarily to growth from new partners.
    • Adjusted EBITDA increased 24% year-over-year, resulting in 110 basis points of margin expansion to 30.3% of Revenue ex-TAC. This improvement was driven by the growth in higher margin Content & Media revenue and operating leverage.

    “In 2012 we generated over $60 million of free cash flow, which more than funded our acquisition of Name.com and the repurchase of nearly $9 million of our common stock,” said Demand Media’s CFO Mel Tang. “We plan to continue reinvesting our strong cash flows into long-term growth opportunities, such as our gTLD initiative as well as growing and diversifying our content offerings.”

    Business Highlights:

    • Demand Media ranked as a top 20 US web property throughout 2012, and ranked #13 in January 2013.(1)
    • Demand Media reached more than 125 million unique visitors worldwide in January 2013.(1)
    • eHow.com ranked as the #12 website in the US, with 62.0 million unique users inJanuary 2013.(1)
    • LIVESTRONG.COM/eHow Health ranked as the #3 Health property in the US inJanuary 2013.(1)
    • Cracked ranked as the #1 Humor property in the US in January 2013.(1)
    • On December 31, 2012, Demand Media acquired retail registrar Name.com, expanding its registrar platform as it prepares for the historic release of new gTLDs.
    • During the fourth quarter of 2012, Demand Media repurchased approximately 572,000 shares of common stock for $4.9 million under its Board-authorized $50.0 million share repurchase program. To date, the Company has repurchased approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock for $30.8 million.
    • On February 19, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a plan to explore the separation of its business into two distinct publicly traded companies.

    (1) Source: comScore.

    Operating Metrics:
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    % %
    2011 2012 Change 2011 2012 Change
    Content & Media Metrics:
    Owned and operated
    Page views(1) (in millions) 2,696 3,354 24 % 10,378 13,192 27 %
    RPM(2) $ 14.53 $ 14.55 $ 15.14 $ 13.53 (11 )%
    Network of customer websites
    Page views(1)(in millions) 4,935 4,530 (8 )% 17,436 18,989 9 %
    RPM(2) $ 2.81 $ 4.38 56 % $ 2.77 $ 3.58 29 %
    RPM ex-TAC(3) $ 2.18 $ 2.98 37 % $ 2.06 $ 2.55 24 %
    Registrar Metrics:
    End of Period # of Domains(4) (in millions) 12.7 13.7 8 % 12.7 13.7 8 %
    Average Revenue per Domain(5) $ 10.08 $ 10.09 $ 10.08 $ 10.19 1 %
    ____________________
    (1) Page views represent the total number of web pages viewed across (a) our owned and operated websites and/or (b) our network of customer websites, to the extent that the viewed customer web pages host the Company’s monetization, social media and/or content services.
    (2) RPM is defined as Content & Media revenue per one thousand page views.
    (3) RPM ex-TAC is defined as Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC per one thousand page views.
    (4) Domain is defined as an individual domain name paid for by a third-party customer where the domain name is managed through our Registrar service offering.
    (5) Average revenue per domain is calculated by dividing Registrar revenue for a period by the average number of domains registered in that period. Average revenue per domain for partial year periods is annualized.
    Beginning July 1, 2011, the number of net new domains has been adjusted to include only new registered domains added to our platform for which the Company has recognized revenue. Excluding the impact of this change, average revenue per domain during the three months and year ended December 31, 2012 would have increased 1% and decreased 4%, respectively, compared to the corresponding prior-year periods.

    Q4 2012 Operating Metrics:

    • Owned & Operated page views increased 24% year-over-year, driven primarily by strong traffic growth on eHow.com and LIVESTRONG.COM. Owned & Operated RPMs were relatively flat year-over-year.
    • Network page views decreased 8% year-over-year to 4.5 billion, due primarily to lower traffic from our social media partners. Network RPM ex-TAC increased 37% year-over-year, reflecting higher revenue from our growing network of content partners, primarily YouTube.
    • End of period domains increased 8% year-over-year to 13.7 million, driven primarily by the addition of higher volume customers and continued growth from existing resellers, with average revenue per domain flat year-over-year.

    Business Outlook

    The following forward-looking information includes certain projections made by management as of the date of this press release. The Company does not intend to revise or update this information, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future. Due to a variety of factors, actual results may differ significantly from those projected. The factors that may affect results include, without limitation, the factors referenced later in this announcement under the caption “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” These and other factors are discussed in more detail in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Excluding $5 to $10 million of estimated expenses in 2013 associated with the formation of the Company’s gTLD initiative, the Company’s guidance for the first quarter endingMarch 31, 2013 and fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 is as follows:

    First Quarter 2013

    • Revenue in the range of $100.0 – $102.0 million
    • Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $94.0 – $96.0 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $23.5 – $25.5 million
    • Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.07 – $0.08 per share
    • Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 – 90.0 million

    Full Year 2013

    • Revenue in the range of $435.0 – $443.0 million
    • Revenue ex-TAC in the range of $410.0 – $418.0 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA in the range of $110.0 – $115.0 million
    • Adjusted EPS in the range of $0.39 – $0.43 per share
    • Weighted average diluted shares 89.0 – 91.0 million

    Conference Call and Webcast Information

    Demand Media will host a corresponding conference call and live webcast at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time today. To access the conference call, dial 877.565.1268 (for domestic participants) or 937.999.3108 (for international participants). The conference ID is 90583374. To participate on the live call, analysts should dial-in at least 10 minutes prior to the commencement of the call. A live webcast also will be available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s corporate website at http://ir.demandmedia.com and via replay beginning approximately two hours after the completion of the call.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we use certain non-GAAP financial measures described below. The presentation of this additional financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations” included at the end of this release.

    Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure is the same, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules posted on the investor relations section of our corporate website athttp://ir.demandmedia.com. The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release are the primary measures used by the Company’s management and board of directors to understand and evaluate its financial performance and operating trends, including period to period comparisons, to prepare and approve its annual budget and to develop short and long term operational plans. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is the primary measure used by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors to establish the funding targets for and fund its annual bonus pool for the Company’s employees and executives. We believe our presented non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) management frequently uses them in its discussions with investors, commercial bankers, securities analysts and other users of its financial statements.

    Revenue ex-TAC is defined by the Company as GAAP revenue less traffic acquisition costs (TAC). TAC comprises the portion of Content & Media GAAP revenue shared with the Company’s network customers. Management believes that Revenue ex-TAC is a meaningful measure of operating performance because it is frequently used for internal managerial purposes and helps facilitate a more complete period-to-period understanding of factors and trends affecting the Company’s underlying revenue performance of its Content & Media service offering.

    Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before income tax expense, other income (expense), interest expense (income), depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, as well as the financial impact of acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect the Company’s business in a manner that allows for meaningful period to period comparisons and analysis of trends. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period to period comparisons of the Company’s underlying recurring revenue and operating costs, which is focused more closely on the current costs necessary to utilize previously acquired long-lived assets. In addition, management believes that it can be useful to exclude certain non-cash charges because the amount of such expenses is the result of long-term investment decisions in previous periods rather than day-to-day operating decisions. For example, due to the long-lived nature of a majority of its media content, the revenue generated by the Company’s media content assets in a given period bears little relationship to the amount of its investment in media content in that same period. Accordingly, management believes that content acquisition costs represent a discretionary long-term capital investment decision undertaken at a point in time. This investment decision is clearly distinguishable from other ongoing business activities, and its discretionary nature and long-term impact differentiate it from specific period transactions, decisions regarding day-to-day operations, and activities that would have an immediate impact on operating or financial performance if materially changed, deferred or terminated.

    Adjusted Earnings Per Share is defined by the Company as Adjusted Net Income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Adjusted Net Income is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before the effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, accelerated amortization of intangible assets removed from service, acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions, and is calculated using the application of a normalized effective tax rate. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share provide investors with additional useful information to measure the Company’s underlying financial performance, particularly from period to period, because these measures are exclusive of certain non-cash expenses not directly related to the operation of its ongoing business (such as amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, as well as certain other non-cash expenses such as purchase accounting adjustments and stock-based compensation) and include a normalized effective tax rate based on the Company’s statutory tax rate.

    Discretionary Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as net cash provided by operating activities excluding cash outflows from acquisition and realignment activities, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, and expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, less capital expenditures to acquire property and equipment. Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as Discretionary Free Cash Flow less investments in intangible assets and is not impacted by gTLD application payments, which were $18.2 million in 2012. Management believes that Discretionary Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow provide investors with additional useful information to measure operating liquidity because they reflect the Company’s underlying cash flows from recurring operating activities after investing in capital assets and intangible assets. These measures are used by management, and may also be useful for investors, to assess the Company’s ability to generate cash flow for a variety of strategic opportunities, including reinvestment in the business, pursuing new business opportunities, potential acquisitions, payment of dividends and share repurchases.

    The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations because they do not reflect all items of income and expense, or cash flows that affect the Company’s operations. An additional limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not have standardized meanings, and therefore other companies may use the same or similarly named measures but exclude different items or use different computations. Management compensates for these limitations by reconciling these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures within its financial press releases. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial information used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore comparability may be limited. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure. The accompanying tables have more details on the GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations.

    About Demand Media

    Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD) is a leading digital media and domain services company that informs and entertains one of the internet’s largest audiences, helps advertisers find innovative ways to engage with their customers and enables publishers, individuals and businesses to expand their online presence. Headquartered in Santa Monica, CA, Demand Media has offices in North America, South America and Europe. For more information about Demand Media, please visit www.demandmedia.com.

    Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regarding the Company’s future financial performance, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, financial condition, operating performance and results of operations, including certain assumptions related thereto. Statements containing words such as guidance, may, believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, project, projections, business outlook, and estimate or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among others: our ability to complete a separation of our business as announced herein and unanticipated developments that may delay or negatively impact such a transaction; the possibility that we may decide not to proceed with the separation of our business as announced herein if we determine that alternative opportunities are more favorable to our stockholders; the possibility that we decide to separate our business in a manner different from that disclosed herein; the impact and possible disruption to our operations from pursuing such a separation transaction announced herein; our ability to retain key personnel; the high costs we will likely incur in connection with such a transaction, which we would not be able to recoup if such a transaction is not consummated; the expectation that the transaction announced herein will be tax-free; revenue and growth expectations for the two independent companies following the separation of our business; the ability of each business to operate as an independent entity upon completion of such a transaction; changes in the methodologies of internet search engines, including ongoing algorithmic changes made by Google as well as possible future changes, and the impact such changes may have on page view growth and driving search related traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; changes in our content creation and distribution platform, including the possible repurposing of content to alternate distribution channels, reduced investments in intangible assets or the sale or removal of content; our ability to successfully launch, produce and monetize new content formats; the inherent challenges of estimating the overall impact on page views and search driven traffic to our owned and operated websites based on the data available to us as internet search engines continue to make adjustments to their search algorithms; our ability to compete with new or existing competitors; our ability to maintain or increase our advertising revenue; our ability to continue to drive and grow traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to effectively monetize our portfolio of content; our dependence on material agreements with a specific business partner for a significant portion of our revenue; future internal rates of return on content investment and our decision to invest in different types of content in the future, including premium video and other formats of text content; our ability to attract and retain freelance creative professionals; changes in our level of investment in media content intangibles; the effects of changes or shifts in internet marketing expenditures, including from text to video content as well as from desktop to mobile content; the effects of shifting consumption of media content from desktop to mobile; the effects of seasonality on traffic to our owned and operated websites and the websites of our network customers; our ability to continue to add partners to our registrar platform on competitive terms; our ability to successfully pursue and implement our gTLD initiative; changes in stock-based compensation; changes in amortization or depreciation expense due to a variety of factors; potential write downs, reserves against or impairment of assets including receivables, goodwill, intangibles (including media content) or other assets; changes in tax laws, our business or other factors that would impact anticipated tax benefits or expenses; our ability to successfully identify, consummate and integrate acquisitions; our ability to retain key customers and key personnel; risks associated with litigation; the impact of governmental regulation; and the effects of discontinuing or discontinued business operations. From time to time, we may consider acquisitions or divestitures that, if consummated, could be material. Any forward-looking statements regarding financial metrics are based upon the assumption that no such acquisition or divestiture is consummated during the relevant periods. If an acquisition or divestiture were consummated, actual results could differ materially from any forward-looking statements. More information about potential risk factors that could affect our operating and financial results are contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endingDecember 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(http://www.sec.gov) on February 24, 2012, and as such risk factors may be updated in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, information under the captions Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

    Furthermore, as discussed above, the Company does not intend to revise or update the information set forth in this press release, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future.

    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Revenue $ 84,415 $ 103,142 $ 324,866 $ 380,578
    Operating expenses
    Service costs (exclusive of amortization of intangible assets shown separately below) (1) (2) 40,198 48,865 155,830 181,018
    Sales and marketing (1) (2) 9,325 12,823 37,394 46,501
    Product development (1) (2) 9,462 9,719 38,146 40,708
    General and administrative (1) (2) 13,803 16,171 59,451 63,025
    Amortization of intangible assets 16,393 9,460 47,174 40,676
    Total operating expenses 89,181 97,038 337,995 371,928
    Income (loss) from operations (4,766 ) 6,104 (13,129 ) 8,650
    Other income (expense)
    Interest income 4 8 56 42
    Interest expense (151 ) (157 ) (861 ) (622 )
    Other income (expense), net (75 ) (34 ) (413 ) (111 )
    Total other expense (222 ) (183 ) (1,218 ) (691 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes (4,988 ) 5,921 (14,347 ) 7,959
    Income tax expense (1,438 ) (1,172 ) (4,177 ) (1,783 )
    Net (loss) income $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
     
    (1) Stock-based compensation expense included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 711 $ 679 $ 2,052 $ 2,820
    Sales and marketing 1,416 1,597 4,857 6,118
    Product development 1,364 1,283 5,013 6,452
    General and administrative 3,263 3,823 16,934 15,978
    Total stock-based compensation expense $ 6,754 $ 7,382 $ 28,856 $ 31,368
    (2) Depreciation included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 3,770 $ 3,663 $ 16,075 $ 14,452
    Sales and marketing 127 108 423 453
    Product development 308 238 1,466 1,025
    General and administrative 861 1,025 2,994 3,728
    Total depreciation $ 5,066 $ 5,034 $ 20,958 $ 19,658
    Income (loss) per common share:
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Cumulative preferred stock dividends (3) (2,477 )
    Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (21,001 ) $ 6,176
    Net income (loss) per share – basic (0.08 ) 0.06 (0.27 ) 0.07
    Net income (loss) per share – diluted (0.08 ) 0.05 (0.27 ) 0.07
    Weighted average number of shares – basic 83,592 86,140 78,646 84,553
    Weighted average number of shares – diluted 83,592 88,444 78,646 87,237
    ____________________
    (3) As a result of the Company’s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, all shares of the Company’s preferred stock were converted to common stock.
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In thousands)
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012
    Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 86,035 $ 102,933
    Accounts receivable, net 32,665 45,517
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets 8,656 6,041
    Deferred registration costs 50,636 57,718
    Total current assets 177,992 212,209
    Property and equipment, net 32,626 35,467
    Intangible assets, net 111,304 91,061
    Goodwill 256,060 267,034
    Deferred registration costs 9,555 11,320
    Other long-term assets 2,566 20,906
    Total assets $ 590,103 $ 637,997
    Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
    Current liabilities
    Accounts payable $ 10,046 $ 10,471
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 33,932 40,489
    Deferred tax liabilities 18,288 18,892
    Deferred revenue 71,109 75,142
    Total current liabilities 133,375 144,994
    Deferred revenue 14,802 15,965
    Other liabilities 1,660 4,847
    Total liabilities 149,837 165,806
    Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    Common stock and additional paid-in capital 528,042 562,703
    Treasury stock (17,064 ) (25,932 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income 59 15
    Accumulated deficit (70,771 ) (64,595 )
    Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) 440,266 472,191
    Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ 590,103 $ 637,997
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Cash flows from operating activities:
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization 21,459 14,494 68,132 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 6,741 7,382 28,730 31,368
    Other 1,128 1,134 3,491 1,717
    Net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions 4,322 (1,722 ) 3,520 (8,612 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities 27,224 26,037 85,349 90,983
    Cash flows from investing activities:
    Purchases of property and equipment (4,222 ) (5,283 ) (18,246 ) (17,708 )
    Purchases of intangibles (5,294 ) (4,647 ) (49,283 ) (13,237 )
    Payments for gTLD applications (18,202 )
    Cash paid for acquisitions (38 ) (16,200 ) (31,010 ) (17,480 )
    Other (855 )
    Net cash used in investing activities (9,554 ) (26,130 ) (98,539 ) (67,482 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net (145 ) 78,480
    Repurchases of common stock (13,336 ) (4,913 ) (17,064 ) (8,869 )
    Proceeds from exercises of stock options and contributions to ESPP 3,242 1,451 7,599 12,467
    Net taxes paid on RSUs vesting and options exercised (364 ) (6,151 ) (725 ) (9,496 )
    Other (168 ) (258 ) (1,354 ) (668 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (10,771 ) (9,871 ) 66,936 (6,566 )
    Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents (18 ) (19 ) (49 ) (37 )
    Change in cash and cash equivalents 6,881 (9,983 ) 53,697 16,898
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 79,154 112,916 32,338 86,035
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 86,035 $ 102,933 $ 86,035 $ 102,933
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures to Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Revenue ex-TAC:
    Content & Media revenue $ 53,032 $ 68,633 $ 205,450 $ 246,399
    Less: traffic acquisition costs (TAC) (3,111 ) (6,332 ) (12,495 ) (19,441 )
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC 49,921 62,301 192,955 226,958
    Registrar revenue 31,383 34,509 119,416 134,179
    Total Revenue ex-TAC $ 81,304 $ 96,810 $ 312,371 $ 361,137
    Adjusted EBITDA(1):
    Net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    Income tax expense 1,438 1,172 4,177 1,783
    Interest and other expense, net 222 183 1,218 691
    Depreciation and amortization(2) 21,459 14,494 68,132 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 6,754 7,382 28,856 31,368
    Acquisition and realignment costs(3) 271 314 2,099 446
    gTLD expense(4) 1,061 2,650
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 23,718 $ 29,355 $ 85,958 $ 103,448
    Discretionary and Total Free Cash Flow:
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 27,224 $ 26,037 $ 85,349 $ 90,983
    Purchases of property and equipment (4,222 ) (5,283 ) (18,246 ) (17,708 )
    Acquisition and realignment cash flows 602 25 1,670 25
    gTLD expense cash flows(4) 974 2,198
    Discretionary Free Cash Flow 23,604 21,753 68,773 75,498
    Purchases of intangible assets (5,294 ) (4,647 ) (49,283 ) (13,237 )
    Free Cash Flow(4)(5) $ 18,310 $ 17,106 $ 19,490 $ 62,261
    Adjusted Net Income:
    GAAP net income (loss) $ (6,426 ) $ 4,749 $ (18,524 ) $ 6,176
    (a) Stock-based compensation 6,754 7,382 28,856 31,368
    (b) Amortization of intangible assets – M&A 2,974 2,572 12,773 10,904
    (c) Content intangible assets removed from service(2) 5,898 237 5,898 2,055
    (d) Acquisition and realignment costs(3) 271 314 2,099 446
    (e) gTLD expense(4) 1,061 2,650
    (f) Income tax effect of items (a) – (e) & application of 38% statutory tax rate to pre-tax income (2,707 ) (5,473 ) (9,229 ) (19,262 )
    Adjusted Net Income $ 6,764 $ 10,842 $ 21,873 $ 34,337
    Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted $ 0.08 $ 0.12 $ 0.25 $ 0.39
    Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted(6) 86,758 88,444 88,541 87,237
    ___________________
    (1) Effective Q1 2012, the Company began reporting Adjusted EBITDA instead of Adjusted OIBDA. While the dollar value of each measure does not differ, a comparison of the historical reconciliation of both measures is provided in our supplemental financial schedules available on the investor relations section of our corporate website.
    (2) In conjunction with its previously announced plans to improve its content creation and distribution platform, the Company elected to remove certain content assets from service, resulting in accelerated amortization expense of $5.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, and $1.8 million and $0.2 million in the first and fourth quarter of 2012, respectively.
    (3) Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, and (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities. Management does not consider these costs to be indicative of the Company’s core operating results.
    (4) Comprises formation expenses directly related to the Company’s gTLD initiative that did not generate associated revenue in 2012.
    (5) In 2012, the Company invested $18.2 million in gTLD applications, which did not impact its recurring Free Cash Flow metric.
    (6) Shares used to calculate non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income per share – diluted include the weighted average common stock for the periods presented and all dilutive common stock equivalents at each period. Amounts have been adjusted in 2011 to reflect the revised capital structure following the Company’s initial public offering which was completed on January 31, 2011, whereby the Company issued 5,175 shares of common stock and converted certain warrants and all of its previously outstanding convertible preferred stock into 62,155 shares of common stock as if those transactions were consummated on January 1, 2011.
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited GAAP Revenue, by Revenue Source
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites $ 39,172 $ 48,796 $ 157,089 $ 178,511
    Network of customer websites 13,860 19,837 48,361 67,888
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 53,032 68,633 205,450 246,399
    Registrar 31,383 34,509 119,416 134,179
    Total Revenue $ 84,415 $ 103,142 $ 324,866 $ 380,578
    Three months ended Year ended
    December 31, December 31,
    2011 2012 2011 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites 46 % 47 % 48 % 47 %
    Network of customer websites 16 % 19 % 15 % 18 %
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 63 % 67 % 63 % 65 %
    Registrar 37 % 33 % 37 % 35 %
    Total Revenue 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

     

    Source: Demand Media, Inc.

  • SEO Factors To Consider When Choosing A Domain Name

    The old saying “a stitch in time saves nine” couldn’t be more applicable than when it comes to launching a new website. It pays to take the time “make your list and check it twice.” Making the right choices before you launch a website can save a lot of time later.

    Obviously, one of the of the most important decisions you’ll need to make when launching a new site is your domain. Since about ⅔ of consumers use search engines to help make buying decisions, search engine traffic is critical to the success or failure of most websites. This results in SEO being a common decision-making factor for choosing a domain.

    How will my domain name impact SEO?

    There are two primary ways your domain will impact your future SEO efforts and search rankings:

    • Keywords
    • Branding

    Let’s examine each of these in more detail.

    Keywords

    Historically, many SEOs chose domain names that included their target keyword phrases. For example, if you wanted to rank for the keyword green widgets, you might use a domain such as greenwidgets.net (exact match domain or EMD) or greenwidgetsshop.com (phrase match domain or PMD). The presence of the keyword phrase in the domain made it easier to gain a high ranking for that keyword phrase.

    With the introduction of recent algorithms such as the Penguin update and the Exact Match Domain (EMD) update, Google has changed how they view domains that include keywords. Is it still worthwhile to choose a domain that includes your target keyword phrase? Let’s look at the data.

    Should you choose a domain name with your keywords in it?

    Our recent Google’s EMD Update study found that after the Google EMD Update:

    • Average EMD site ranking decreased from #13.4 to #26.6
    • Average PMD site ranking decreased from #39.7 to #47.7

    Dr Pete also has some excellent data on EMDs in his article Are Exact-Match Domains (EMDs) in Decline?

    From this data, we can draw the conclusion that EMDs (and PMDs) no longer provide the same ranking boost that they used to. However, EMDs can, and in many cases do, still rank well. Our advice regarding keywords in your domain is:

    • If you already own an EMD or PMD, you don’t necessarily need to get rid of it
    • If you’re buying a new domain, an EMD or PMD isn’t necessarily bad, but branding factors are more important
    • If you can buy a domain that includes one or more of your keywords without sacrificing any branding considerations, that may be a good choice

    Branding

    It may interact with SEO in a less obvious way, but branding is actually the most important SEO consideration for purchasing a new domain. Your online brand (how people perceive and remember you) will directly impact your SEO efforts and results. Why? It’s simple:

    • “Brands are the solution, not the problem. Brands are how you sort out the cesspool.” ~Google CEO Eric Schmidt
    • Google likes brands, because users like brands. Which site would you rather read, link to, or share with your friends – NYtimes.com or your-ny-news-stuff.com ?

    See The Rise of Brands in Google’s Relevancy Algorithms.

    A strong online brand means users are more likely to click on, read, share, and link to a website…all of which will help the site gain higher Google rankings.

    Choosing a domain as the foundation of your online brand

    The first step in building a strong online brand is choosing a good domain. Choose a domain that is:

    • Memorable. You have no hope of building a brand if users can’t remember your name.
    • Unique. A generic sounding name, such as musicsite.com won’t have the same impact as a unique domain name.
    • Relevant. Some domains are industry-neutral, whereas others are clearly relevant to a specific industry (example: WebMD).
    • Not error-prone. For instance, a domain such as example.ws is a branding nightmare, because users will tend to type example.com instead. Delicious changed its domain name because so many users got confused by their non-standard domain.
    • Short. Most well-known online brands are 1-2 words or less. SEOmoz suggests sticking to a domain of 15 characters or less.

    Remember that your domain is just the start of building a brand – an essential step, but only the first step.

    Bonus Tip: Avoid Hyphens

    If mysite.com is taken, should you buy my-site.com? No. Here are 3 reasons to avoid hyphenated domains.

  • Demand Media’s eNom Teams Up With Parallels On TLDs

    Demand Media announced today that its domain registrar eNom’s Top Level Domain (TLD) program is included in the latest version of Parallels Plesk Panel and in Parallels Domain Name Network.

    “The Internet is undergoing an historic change, and our valuable relationship with eNom enables us to provide solutions and information to educate customers who want to be on the forefront of this revolution,” said John Zanni, VP of marketing and alliances for Parallels. “Access to the new TLD space will tremendously benefit our customers, and eNom makes this possible.”

    Parallels customers will be able to participate in “all aspects of the initial phases” of the new TLD launch, the two companies say. That means during the “sunrise” and “landrush” periods.

    “The excitement around new TLDs is growing, and our integration with Parallels helps validate this,” said Chris Sheridan, VP of business development for eNom. “Through these integrations, we’re opening up the opportunity for a new group of businesses and consumers to become actively involved in the innovative new TLD market. eNom’s session on new TLDs is aimed at educating attendees on this exciting time for the web.”

    The services, called “eNom New TLD Extension for Parallels Plesk Panel”, will be available through the Server Management Extensions in the Service Provider interface or from the Parallels Partner Products site.

    Sheridan will be speaking about the new TLDs program at Parallels Summit next week in Vegas.

  • GoDaddy Now Offers Websites to OfficeMax Customers

    If you’re a small business looking to set up a web presence, you’ll soon be able to get started by walking into OfficeMax.

    GoDaddy and OfficeMax have just announced a partnership that allows for the sale of GoDaddy website bundles inside OfficeMax stores nationwide. That means that you can visit any of the 900 OfficeMax locations and buy a domain name for $12.99.

    Or, you can opt for a premium package that offers 999 pages, 10 email addresses, a domain name, SEO strategy, and online storage for 250 bucks.

    “An in-store presence at OfficeMax gives Go Daddy the opportunity to help small business owners and entrepreneurs who are looking to grow their businesses,” said Go Daddy Vice President of Marketing Teri Dhooge. “The Internet is at the heart of today’s economy. If you’re not building an online presence, you’re missing opportunities to capture new customers, yet, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly seventy-five percent of businesses don’t have a website. Partnering with OfficeMax means we can help more people leverage the power of the Internet – people who may not realize how easy it can be.”

    “The introduction of Go Daddy websites and domain names in our stores is the first of many steps we’re taking to provide entrepreneurs with industry-leading solutions for starting, running and growing their business,” said Michael Lewis, executive vice president and president of Retail at OfficeMax. “Having a digital presence is instrumental to business success, as it’s increasingly where consumers and businesses go to research and shop. Together with Go Daddy, we’re offering a complete array of products and services to help small businesses boost their online visibility, reach customers and drive sales in the digital space.”

    GoDaddy says that out of their 11 million customers, over 70% are small or medium-sized businesses.

    [via Mashable]

  • Google Isn’t Blocking Domains In Search Results Like It’s Supposed To

    Google is not blocking domains users tell it to from search results.

    Early last year, in Google’s efforts clean up the quality of its search results, the search engine launched a feature that let users block domains from search results that they didn’t want to see in their future results. Tired of some content farm showing up every time you search for something? Go ahead and tell Google you don’t want results from that domain, and you should be all set.

    Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately for any sites frequently being blocked), Google doesn’t seem to be acknowledging these requests from users any longer. It’s unclear at this point whether this is or intentional or not, but it seems to be on the surface.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points to a Google Web Search help thread pointing out that users have been experiencing this issue for sometime, and was able to confirm that Google was not showing the feature in search results for him, and that blocking a site from Google’s “Blocked Sites” settings page also did not work.

    We also confirmed this on our end. The feature in the actual results simply is not there, and blocking from the settings just isn’t working. I searched “how to tie a tie,” and blocked a domain from the settings. The settings page listed the domain as blocked afterwards, but the domain still appeared in the search results.

    Block domains

    Note: Nothing personal against the site in the screenshot. Just a random test, which I removed from the blocked list.

    We’ve reached out to Google for comment, and will update accordingly.

    Google has been quietly making other changes to Search. Yesterday, we told you about Google’s changes to SafeSearch results, which were not accompanied by any announcement.

  • The Best Drunken SEO Pitch You’ll Hear Today

    The Best Drunken SEO Pitch You’ll Hear Today

    McCollum & Griggs LLC, a Kansas City law firm has put out a humorous clip featuring a voicemail they claim comes from West Coast SEO company. The guy, who the firm says is drunk (which does appear to be quite possible, based on the audio) claims to be from Microsoft.

    “We’re pretty sure this guy is not from Microsoft,” Phil Singleton, CEO of Kanasas City Web Design, which handles the firm’s site, tells WebProNews.

    “An SEO & Internet marketing company on the West Coast tried to sell a domain name related to personal injury law to Kansas City attorneys, McCollum & Griggs, LLC,” David McCollum from the firm explains in the video description. “After a couple days of civil discussions with the domain seller, the lawyers politely passed on the opportunity after discussing with their Kansas City SEO firm. The next day, the supervisor (or owner) called back and left a drunken rant on the attorneys’ voicemail.”