WebProNews

Tag: Domains

  • Google Launches .SOY, Its First U.S. TLD

    Google announced the launch of its first US top-level domain – .SOY. The company is targeting a U.S. Hispanic audience, saying the TLD “opens up a new place on the web for everyone to celebrate Hispanic culture – regardless of country of origin or language preference.”

    Soy means “I am” in Spanish. Google says in a blog post:

    .SOY is a space for this influential community to create, discover and connect with culturally relevant content and ideas online. It’s a place where you can build a website for your growing small business or new business venture, or share your passion with the world. When you visit a site that ends in .SOY, you’ll know it was created with a Latino audience in mind.

    Google has partnered with a handful of Hispanic organizations and small businesses. The following are on .SOY domains: Hispanic Heritage Foundation; ELLA Institute; LATISM; Webs; Starfish*Global; Republica; Pix-l Graphx; and Queen of Tacos.

    Google has also set up its own site at HolaGoogle.soy. You can claim a domain via iam.soy.

    Image via Google

  • Amazon Buys .Buy Domain for $4.6 Million

    Amazon Buys .Buy Domain for $4.6 Million

    In yeah that makes a lot of sense news, Amazon has reportedly purchased the highly-coveted new .buy top level domain, and apparently the company beat out Google in the process.

    Domain Name Wire reports that Amazon bought the .buy domain for $4,588,888. Other companies in the running in ICANN’s auction were Google and Famous Four Media.

    Google also lost out on another domain it was vying for – .VIP. That sold for just of $3 Million to Minds + Machines, a top level domain reseller.

    ICANN’s auction also had .tech up for bid – and it sold for the highest price, $6,760,000. Domain Name Wire suggests that this is probably either a record for a top level domain acquisition or pretty close to a record high.

    It is expected that these new domains will open up later this year.

    Considering a majority of Amazon’s business involves people buying stuff, .buy must’ve seemed like a no-brainer for the company. It’s likely that Amazon will register the most lucrative .buy names, and sell the rest for premium bucks. At least that’s what I’d do.

    Though Amazon now owns .buy, there’s one gTLD the company won’t have the rights to. In July of 2013, ICANN nixed Amazon’s attempt to own the .amazon domain.

    Domain Name Wire via The Next Web

  • Sarah Palin Forgets to Cover All Her Domain Bases

    Earlier this week, Vice Presidential runner-up and Facebook celebrity Sarah Palin launched the Sarah Palin Channel, an online television channel that will “go beyond the sound bites and the media’s politically correct filter to get to the truth,” according to Palin. The truth will run you $9.95 a month.

    The site features a video, various blog entries, ‘Sally’s Word of the Day’, a Quote of the Day, and Image of the Day, a National Debt counter, and a countdown to President Obama’s last day in office. I assume that when the latter hits zero, so will the debt counter. I think that’s how it works.

    As you would expect, the Sarah Palin Channel resides at sarahpalinchannel.com.

    But when you’re starting out a new online venture, you have to cover all your domain bases. That’s why www.fb.com, www.thefacebook.com, and even www.facbook.com all redirect to Facebook. You have to assume there will be some domain confusion at some point.

    But Palin failed to snatch up arguably the most logical secondary domain name for her site – THEsarahpalinchannel.com.

    It’s ok. Someone else did.

    Currently, thesarahpalinchannel.com features a photo of Palin, saying it’s the “only Sarah Palin Channel on the internet with a definite article in the address!”

    Image via screenshot, Comedy Central video

  • ICANN To Court: ccTLDs Aren’t Property

    ICANN To Court: ccTLDs Aren’t Property

    ICANN (The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) told a U.S. federal court in the District of Columbia, that a ccTLD (country code Top-Level Domain ) can’t be considered property. For this reason, it says, it can’t be attached by plaintiffs in a lawsuit, when they’re trying to obtain assets of countries they say have supported terrorism.

    ICANN General Counsel and Secretary John Jeffrey explained, “We filed a Motion to Quash in the US federal court today, to ensure that the court has the essential information about how the Internet’s domain name system (DNS) works. While we sympathize with what plaintiffs may have endured, ICANN’s role in the domain name system has nothing to do with any property of the countries involved.

    “We explained in our Motion to Quash, that country code Top-Level Domains (ccTLD) are part of a single, global interoperable Internet which ICANN serves to help maintain, he continued. “ccTLD’s are not property, and are not ‘owned’ or ‘possessed’ by anyone including ICANN, and therefore cannot be seized in a lawsuit.”

    The comments come after terrorism victims successfully won lawsuits against Iran, Syria and North Korea. Plaintiffs served ICANN with “writs of attachment” and subpoenas seeking info to help them seize those countries’ ccTLDs in an effort to recover assets from them.

    ccTLDs (and related IP addresses) specifically targeted by the plaintiffs include .IR (Iran), .SY (Syria) and .KP (North Korea). Also being targeted, according to ICANN, are internationalized top-level domains in non-ASCII characters for Iran and Syria.

    ICANN’s filings can be found here. The “Writs of Attachment” can be found here.

    Image via ICANNnews/YouTube

  • Facebook Connects Mobile App Ads To Pages

    Facebook announced that it is aligning mobile app ads to other ad formats by connecting them to Facebook Pages and adding social context, such as indicating when a friend like a Page. It’s also adding like, comment, and share buttons.

    Facebook’s Calvin Grunewald said in a blog post, “Desktop (canvas) app ads, have always included like, comment, and share buttons, but will now be connected to a Facebook Page as well. These changes will offer you consistency amongst all your Facebook ads, and will have the added benefit of social context.”

    Advertisers won’t be able to create or edit app ads in the old format beginning on July 2nd. All old-style app ads will be migrated to the new style on August 6th. If you don’t connect your ad to a Page, Facebook will create a new Page for it. There’s an API solution for connecting it here.

    Facebook has also changed how Domain Insights determines domains for which posts, clicks, and impressions are recorded.

    “This update will make it easier for you to see all of your Facebook traffic if you use multiple subdomains,” explains Grunewald. “Previously we would only show the event of the domain for which it occurred. Within the next couple of days we will now show each event against the domain as well as each of the parent domains.”

    More on the changes here.

    Image via Facebook

  • GoDaddy To Try This IPO Thing Again

    GoDaddy To Try This IPO Thing Again

    Set to go public, GoDaddy has filed its S1 with the SEC, proposing an initial public offering of shares of its Class A common stock.

    Rumors had been heating up earlier this year that the company would move ahead with an iPO, but it’s now official. From the press release:

    Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. are acting as lead joint book-running managers for the proposed offering, Barclays Capital Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and RBC Capital Markets, LLC are acting as book-running managers for the proposed offering, and KKR Capital Markets LLC and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated are acting as co-managers for the proposed offering.

    The offering will be made only by means of a prospectus. A copy of the preliminary prospectus, when available, may be obtained from Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by telephone at 1-866-803-9204; or Citigroup, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Ave., Edgewood, NY 11717 or by calling (800) 831-9146.

    A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective.

    The company filed for an IPO about eight years ago, but backed out under the leadership of Bob Parsons. The company was acquired by private equity firms three years ago.

    Image via YouTube

  • Google’s ‘Rules Of Thumb’ For When You Buy A Domain

    Google has a new Webmaster Help video out, in which Matt Cutts talks about buying domains that have had trouble with Google in the past, and what to do. Here’s the specific question he addresses:

    How can we check to see if a domain (bought from a registrar) was previously in trouble with Google? I recently bought, and unbeknownst to me the domain isn’t being indexed and I’ve had to do a reconsideration request. How could I have prevented?

    “A few rules of thumb,” he says. “First off, do a search for the domain, and do it in a couple ways. Do a ‘site:’ search, so, ‘site: domain.com’ for whatever it is that you want to buy. If there’s no results at all from that domain even if there’s content on that domain, that’s a pretty bad sign. If the domain is parked, we try to take parked domains out of our results anyways, so that might not indicate anything, but if you try do do ‘site:’ and you see zero results, that’s often a bad sign. Also just search for the domain name or the name of the domain minus the .com or whatever the extension is on the end because you can often find out a little of the reputation of the domain. So were people spamming with that domain name? Were they talking about it? Were they talking about it in a bad way? Like this guy was sending me unsolicited email, and leaving spam comments on my blog. That’s a really good way to sort of figure out what’s going on with that site or what it was like in the past.”

    “Another good rule of thumb is to use the Internet Archive, so if you go to archive.org, and you put in a domain name, the archive will show you what the previous versions of that site look like. And if the site looked like it was spamming, then that’s definitely a reason to be a lot more cautious, and maybe steer clear of buying that domain name because that probably means you might have – the previous owner might have dug the domain into a hole, and you just have to do a lot of work even to get back to level ground.”

    Don’t count on Google figuring it out or giving you an easy way to get things done.

    Cutts continues, “If you’re talking about buying the domain from someone who currently owns it, you might ask, can you either let me see the analytics or the Webmaster Tools console to check for any messages, or screenshots – something that would let me see the traffic over time, because if the traffic is going okay, and then dropped a lot or has gone really far down, then that might be a reason why you would want to avoid the domain as well. If despite all that, you buy the domain, and you find out there was some really scuzzy stuff going on, and it’s got some issues with search engines, you can do a reconsideration request. Before you do that, I would consider – ask yourself are you trying to buy the domain just because you like the domain name or are you buying it because of all the previous content or the links that were coming to it, or something like that. If you’re counting on those links carrying over, you might be disappointed because the links might not carry over. Especially if the previous owner was spamming, you might consider just going a disavow of all the links that you can find on that domain, and try to get a completely fresh start whenever you are ready to move forward with it.”

    Cutts did a video about a year ago about buying spamming domains advising buyers not to be “the guy who gets caught holding the bag.” Watch that one here.

    Image via YouTube

  • Cutts On How Google Views “Sister Sites”

    In the latest “Webmaster Help” video from Google, Matt Cutts takes on the following question:

    Is there any way Google identifies “sister” websites? For example, relationships between eBay.co.uk and eBay.com? Does linking from one to the other taken as paid or unnatural? And I’m strictly talking about good, genuine ccTLDs for businesses?

    “It is the case that we try to interpret as best we can the relationships there are on the web,” he says. “At the same time it’s very helpful if you can tell us a little bit about what your sites are so that we ca return the correct content to users regardless of which country they’re coming from. So let’s look at the spectrum. On one hand, you’ve got ebay.co.uk and ebay.com, and we need to know that those are somehow related, and then on the other hand, we’ve got all the way down to somebody who has a hundred different websites all about medical malpractice or something like that.”

    On the ccTLD case, he adds, “It is the case that we try to figure out that those sites are related, but we are doing the best we can, and if we get a little bit more help, then we can say, ‘Oh, this is a German user. They should get ebay.de or yoursite.de.’ If it’s a French user, they should get the .fr version…that sort of thing. So the best way to help is to use something called hreflang. You can do that inside of a webpage, where you can mark up, ‘Hey, on ebay.com, a French version of this page is over here, and the German version of this page is over here, or if you don’t want to have that in all the different pages on your site, you can also make a sitemap. And you can just say, ‘Okay, over here is one version for a country, here’s another version for a country.’”

    He says doing this is really helpful because Google tries to determine where users are coming from, what their language is, and then show them the best version of your page. If you tell Google what the right versions are, they’re less likely to screw it up.

    He cautions that they might or might not trust links between any given sites on “any given basis.” For the most part, he says, however, that he wouldn’t worry about them being seen as paid or unnatural, because it’s pretty normal.

    He does advise against linking to all versions of the the site in the footer because it looks spammy. I’m pretty sure he’s covered all this before.

    When the sites aren’t about different languages or countries, and you have a bunch of sites, then he says you should be a lot more careful about your linking.

    Image via YouTube

  • WordPress.com Now Offers 12 More TLDs

    WordPress.com is now offering users twelve new top-level domains. You can now register domains with the following TLDs for new or existing sites:

    .com.br
    .net.br
    .info
    .biz
    .mobi
    .mx
    .es
    .nl
    .be
    .fm
    .tv
    .in

    WordPress.com now offers a total of seventeen TLD options for those buying domain names. The others are .com, .net, .org, .me, and .co.

    You can register for any of these regardless of where you live (though you might want to look into how search engines view them with regards to location, as it could have an effect on your search visibility).

    Here’s a video Google put out on the subject last year:

    If you already run a site on WordPress.com, and wish to grab a domain with one of the new options, just go to Store, and then “My Domains”.

    In other domain news, ICANN announced this morning that he number of new gTLDs that have been delegated has surpassed 175. They expect the number to be over 1,300 within the next few years.

    Image via WordPress

  • ICANN: Over 175 New gTLDs Delegated So Far

    ICANN announced on Monday at ICANN 49 in Singapore that the number of new gTLDs that have been delegated has surpassed 175.

    The month of March has seen the approval of .NYC, .Cologne, .AXA, .Webcam, .Trade, .Jetzt, .世界 (xn--rhqv96g) – Chinese for “world/shijie,” .DNP, .Ink, .机构 (xn--nqv7f) – Chinese for “agencies/institutions,” .संगठन (xn--i1b6b1a6a2e) – Hindi for “organization/sangathana,” .组织机构 (xn--nqv7fs00ema) – Chinese for “organization,” .орг (xn--c1avg) – Russian for “organization/org,” .Koeln, .Bid, .Okinawa, .Vote, and .Voto.

    They delegated roughly forty of them in February and nearly fifty in January. You can see the full list of those delegated dating back to October 23rd here. Note that the list is not updated in real time.

    “After completing the New gTLD Program, a new gTLD becomes part of the Internet when it is delegated,” ICANN says. “This means it is introduced into the Internet’s authoritative database, known as the Root Zone.”

    ICANN says that over 1,300 of them could become available within the next few years. The delegation process will continue on a rolling basis.

    Image via YouTube

  • Demand Media Earnings Continue To Suffer Google’s Wrath

    Demand Media reported its financial results for Q4 and fiscal 2013 on Tuesday. The company continues to suffer at the hands of Google algorithm changes (it just so happens that this week marks the three-year anniversary of the Panda update).

    While things seemed to be going better for Demand Media after it navigated around its initial Panda obstacles, somewhere down the line, Google’s algorithm caught up with the company’s properties (specifically eHow) once again. Last quarter, the company reported revenue decline thanks to the lost of search referrals, and this report paints a similar picture.

    Revenue declined by 6% to $96.7 million for the quarter, and the outlook isn’t looking much better.

    CFO Mel Tang said, “We need to fix eHow.”

    On top of that, parking revenue and domain sales are down 33% for the year, compared to 2012.

    Interim CEO Shawn Colo said, “The fourth quarter was highlighted by solid performance from Society6, Content Solutions and our registrar business, offset by continued declines in the Company’s core eHow business. Additionally, we have made steady progress against key initiatives, such as product improvements on Society6 and relaunching the Livestrong.com website, while continuing to prepare for our upcoming spin-off of Rightside Group. I continue to be excited about long-term strategic opportunities within our large and growing markets.”

    Demand Media stock is down nearly 10% on Wednesday morning.

    Since the earnings call, the company has announced a new strategic advertising partnership with Healthline, which will see the latter creating digital ad solutions and exclusively representing key categories for LiveStrong.com.

    Here’s the release in its entirety:

    SANTA MONICA, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD), a leading digital content & media and domain name services company, today reported financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

    “The fourth quarter was highlighted by solid performance from Society6, Content Solutions and our registrar business, offset by continued declines in the Company’s core eHow business. Additionally, we have made steady progress against key initiatives, such as product improvements on Society6 and relaunching the Livestrong.com website, while continuing to prepare for our upcoming spin-off of Rightside Group,” said Shawn Colo , Interim CEO of Demand Media. “I continue to be excited about long-term strategic opportunities within our large and growing markets.”

    Financial Summary
    In millions, except per share amounts
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 Change 2013 2012 Change
    Total Revenue $ 96.7 $ 103.1 (6 %) $ 394.6 $ 380.6 4 %
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 55.4 $ 62.3 (11 %) $ 230.4 $ 227.0 1 %
    Registrar Revenue 38.6 34.5 12 %   148.2   134.2 10 %
    Total Revenue ex-TAC(1) $ 94.0 $ 96.8 (3 %) $ 378.6 $ 361.2 5 %
    Income (loss) from Operations $ (11.3 ) $ 6.1 NA $ (18.5 ) $ 8.7 NA
    Adjusted EBITDA(1) $ 18.0 $ 29.4 (39 %) $ 88.4 $ 103.4 (15 %)
    Net income (loss) $ (11.5 ) $ 4.7 NA $ (20.2 ) $ 6.2 NA
    Adjusted net income(1) $ 3.0 $ 10.8 (72 %) $ 23.2 $ 34.3 (32 %)
    EPS – diluted $ (0.13 ) $ 0.05 NA $ (0.23 ) $ 0.07 NA
    Adjusted EPS – diluted(1) $ 0.03 $ 0.12 (75 %) $ 0.26 $ 0.39 (33 %)
    Cash Flow from Operations $ 9.7 $ 26.0 (63 %) $ 76.2 $ 91.0 (16 %)
    Free Cash Flow(1) $ 8.3 $ 17.1 (51 %) $ 44.4 $ 62.3 (29 %)
    ____________________
    (1) These non-GAAP financial measures are described below and reconciled to their comparable GAAP measures in the accompanying tables.

    Q4 2013 Financial Summary:

    • Total revenue ex-TAC declined 3% year-over-year, with 12% year-over-year growth in Registrar revenue offset by an 11% decline in Content & Media revenue ex-TAC. Excluding the acquisitions of Society6 and Name.com, total revenue ex-TAC decreased 15%.
      • Registrar revenue grew 12% year-over-year, primarily due to the addition of Name.com, which was acquired at the end of Q4 2012. Excluding the acquisition of Name.com, Registrar revenue increased 2%.
      • Owned & Operated revenue decline of 5% was driven primarily by reductions in search engine referral traffic, offset by revenue of $8.4 million from Society6, which was acquired at the end of Q2 2013. Excluding the acquisition of Society6, Owned & Operated revenue decreased 23%.
      • Network revenue ex-TAC declined 31% due primarily to $3.5 million less revenue from the Company’s YouTube Channels as well as declines in the Company’s Social Media and Network Monetization businesses, offset partially by growth in Content Solutions.
    • Adjusted EBITDA decreased 39% year-over-year, primarily reflecting the negative impact from search engine referral traffic on high-margin revenues and a mix shift to lower margin commerce and Registrar revenue.

    “We generated over $8 million of free cash flow in the fourth quarter and over $44 millionfor the year,” said Demand Media’s CFO Mel Tang . “We will continue to invest our free cash flow into our strategic content, commerce and new gTLD initiatives.”

    Business Highlights:

    Content & Media:

    • January 2014 US and Worldwide comScore Rankings:
      • On a consolidated basis, Demand Media ranked as the #19 US web property and Demand Media’s properties reached more than 88 million unique users worldwide.
      • eHow.com ranked as the #27 website in the US and reached more than 50 million unique users worldwide.
      • Livestrong / eHow Health ranked as the #3 Health property in the US, with more than 20 million unique users worldwide.
      • Cracked ranked as the #5 Humor property in the US, with more than 8 million unique users worldwide.
    • In Q4 2013, our Content Solutions business, which delivers custom and hosted content marketing services to partners, grew revenue ex-TAC 50% year-over-year to$2.8 million.
    • During Q4 2013, Society6 had a record $8.4 million of revenue and its sales on Cyber Monday increased 73% year-over-year. Society6 also expanded its product line-up to include mugs, baby onesies, kids T-shirts and a calendar created in collaboration with the artist community.

    Domain Name Services:

    • Launched our back-end registry platform in Q4 2013, powering the launch for over 60 new gTLDs and over 150,000 domain registrations to date.
    • Signed our first registry operator agreements with ICANN in Q4 2013, and have signed 14 agreements to date, including .dance, .democrat, .immobilien and .ninja, which are currently in their ‘sunrise’ launch phase.
    • Our registry entered into its first agreements with registrars to distribute our owned gTLDs, with over 40 signed to date.
    • Our eNom and Name.com registrar channels signed agreements with new registry operators to distribute new gTLDs and have launched over 80 new gTLDs to date.
    Operating Metrics:
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 %
    Change
    2013 2012 %
    Change
    Content & Media Metrics:
    Owned and operated websites
    Page views(1) (in millions) 4,054 3,354 21 % 16,348 13,192 24 %
    RPM(2) $ 11.38 $ 14.55 (22 )% $ 11.96 $ 13.53 (12 )%
    Network of customer websites
    Page views(1) (in millions) 2,245 4,530 (50 )% 16,793 18,989 (12 )%
    RPM(2) $ 5.30 $ 4.38 21 % $ 3.03 $ 3.58 (15 )%
    RPM ex-TAC(3) $ 4.12 $ 2.98 38 % $ 2.08 $ 2.55 (18 )%
    Registrar Metrics:
    End of Period # of Domains(4) (in millions) 15.0 13.7 9 % 15.0 13.7 9 %
    Average Revenue per Domain(5) $ 10.47 $ 10.09 4 % $ 10.36 $ 10.19 2 %
    ____________________
    (1) Page views represent the total number of web pages viewed across (a) our owned and operated websites and/or (b) our network of customer websites, to the extent that the viewed customer web pages host the Company’s monetization, social media and/or content services.
    (2) RPM is defined as Content & Media revenue per one thousand page views.
    (3) RPM ex-TAC is defined as Content & Media revenue ex-TAC per one thousand page views.
    (4) A domain is defined as an individual domain name registered by a third-party customer on our platform for which we have begun to recognize revenue.
    (5) Average revenue per domain is calculated by dividing Registrar revenue for a period by the average number of domains registered in that period. Average revenue per domain for partial year periods is annualized.

    Q4 2013 Operating Metrics:

    • Owned & Operated page views increased 21% year-over-year to 4.1 billion, driven primarily by mobile page view growth on our core Owned & Operated sites, which more than offset significant declines in search engine referral traffic. Owned & Operated RPM decreased 22% year-over-year, reflecting the mix shift to lower yielding mobile page views as well as lower direct display advertising, offset partially by increased revenue from Society6.
    • Revenue per visit to our Owned & Operated Content sites was $0.05, up 25% year-over-year.
    • Network page views decreased 50% year-over-year to 2.2 billion, reflecting the Company’s decision in Q3 2013 to focus its monetization efforts on its Owned & Operated properties. Additionally, there were lower reported page views from its Pluck customers. Network RPM ex-TAC increased 38% year-over-year, reflecting higher monetization of our Social Media and Monetization page views.
    • End of period domains increased 9% year-over-year to 15.0 million, driven by the acquisition of Name.com, with average revenue per domain up 4% year-over-year, due to higher average revenue per domain on Name.com.

    Business Outlook:

    The following forward-looking information includes certain projections made by management as of the date of this press release. The Company does not intend to revise or update this information, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future. Due to a variety of factors, actual results may differ significantly from those projected. The factors that may affect results include, without limitation, the factors referenced later in this announcement under the caption “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” These and other risk factors are discussed in more detail in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Due to the planned separation of the Company’s domain name services business and evolution of its content and media business, the Company is replacing quarterly and annual guidance with a discussion of expected short and long term trends.

    In 2014, the Company expects the following:

    • Slightly declining revenue year-over-year driven by the Company’s shift away from traditional branded display sales and continued declines in eHow coupled with product and ad format changes to improve user experience, offset partially by growth in Society6, Content Solutions and Registrar revenue.
    • Adjusted EBITDA margins in the mid-teens, reflective of the inclusion of $8-$10 million of annual gTLD operating expenses post the launch of our first gTLDs inFebruary 2014, $10-$15 million of operating expense related to content remediation and infrastructure ramp for Society6 and Content Solutions, and a revenue mix shift to lower margin commerce and domain name services revenue.
    • Significant free cash flow generation.

    Longer term, the Company expects the following:

    • Demand Media standalone revenue driven by a return to growth in eHow, as well as our growing Content Solutions and commerce businesses contributing a significantly higher percentage of total revenue.
    • Rightside revenue driven by growth in domain name services revenue from the new gTLD opportunity, partially offset by continued declines in domain parking revenue.
    • For both businesses, we expect margin expansion and to continue to generate significant free cash flow.

    Conference Call and Webcast Information

    Demand Media will host a corresponding conference call and live webcast at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time today. To access the conference call, dial 877.430.7751 and reference conference ID 51526222. To participate on the live call, analysts should dial-in at least 10 minutes prior to the commencement of the call. A live webcast also will be available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s corporate website athttp://ir.demandmedia.com and via replay beginning approximately two hours after the completion of the call.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we use certain non-GAAP financial measures described below. The presentation of this additional financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the tables captioned “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures” included at the end of this release.

    The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release are the primary measures used by the Company’s management and board of directors to understand and evaluate its financial performance and operating trends, including period-to-period comparisons, to prepare and approve its annual budget and to develop short and long term operational plans. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA has been the primary measure used by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors to establish the funding targets for and fund its annual bonus pool for the Company’s employees and executives. We believe our presented non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) management frequently uses them in its discussions with investors, commercial bankers, securities analysts and other users of its financial statements.

    Revenue ex-TAC is defined by the Company as GAAP revenue less traffic acquisition costs (TAC). TAC comprises the portion of Content & Media GAAP revenue shared with the Company’s network customers. Management believes that Revenue ex-TAC is a meaningful measure of operating performance because it is frequently used for internal managerial purposes and helps facilitate a more complete period-to-period understanding of factors and trends affecting the Company’s underlying revenue performance of itsContent & Media service offering.

    Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted EBITDA) is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before income tax expense, interest and other income (expense), depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, as well as the financial impact of acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, net gains or losses on withdrawals of interest in gTLD applications, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities and (4) expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that this non-GAAP financial measure reflects the Company’s business in a manner that allows for meaningful period-to-period comparisons and analysis of trends. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of the Company’s underlying recurring revenue and operating costs, which is focused more closely on the current costs necessary to utilize previously acquired long-lived assets. In addition, management believes that it can be useful to exclude certain non-cash charges because the amount of such expenses is the result of long-term investment decisions in previous periods rather than day-to-day operating decisions. For example, due to the long-lived nature of a majority of its media content, the revenue generated by the Company’s media content assets in a given period bears little relationship to the amount of its investment in media content in that same period. Accordingly, management believes that content acquisition costs represent a discretionary long-term capital investment decision undertaken at a point in time. This investment decision is clearly distinguishable from other ongoing business activities, and its discretionary nature and long-term impact differentiate it from specific period transactions, decisions regarding day-to-day operations, and activities that would have an immediate impact on operating or financial performance if materially changed, deferred or terminated.

    Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Adjusted EPS) is defined by the Company as Adjusted Net Income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Adjusted Net Income is defined by the Company as net income (loss) before the effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, accelerated amortization of content intangible assets removed from service, acquisition and realignment costs, the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, net gains or losses on withdrawals of interest in gTLD applications, and any gains or losses on certain asset sales or dispositions, and is calculated using the application of a normalized effective tax rate. Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (1) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (2) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, (3) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities, and (4) expenditures related to the separation of Demand Mediainto two distinct publicly traded companies. Management does not consider these expenses to be indicative of the Company’s ongoing operating results or future outlook.

    Management believes that Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS provide investors with additional useful information to measure the Company’s underlying financial performance, particularly from period to period, because these measures are exclusive of certain non-cash expenses not directly related to the operation of its ongoing business (such as amortization of intangible assets acquired via business combinations, as well as certain other non-cash expenses such as purchase accounting adjustments and stock-based compensation) and include a normalized effective tax rate based on the Company’s statutory tax rate.

    Discretionary Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as net cash provided by operating activities excluding cash outflows from acquisition and realignment activities, including expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies, and the formation expenses directly related to its gTLD initiative, less capital expenditures to acquire property and equipment. Free Cash Flow is defined by the Company as Discretionary Free Cash Flow less investments in intangible assets and is not impacted by net payments for gTLD applications, which were $3.9 million and $18.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, or net proceeds from the withdrawal of interest in gTLD applications, which were $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Management believes that Discretionary Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow provide investors with additional useful information to measure operating liquidity because they reflect the Company’s underlying cash flows from recurring operating activities after investing in capital assets and intangible assets. These measures are used by management, and may also be useful for investors, to assess the Company’s ability to generate cash flow for a variety of strategic opportunities, including reinvestment in the business, pursuing new business opportunities, potential acquisitions, payment of dividends and share repurchases.

    The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations because they do not reflect all items of income and expense, or cash flows that affect the Company’s operations. An additional limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not have standardized meanings, and therefore other companies may use the same or similarly named measures but exclude different items or use different computations. Management compensates for these limitations by reconciling these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures within its financial press releases. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial information used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore comparability may be limited. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure. The accompanying tables have more details on the GAAP financial measures and the related reconciliations.

    About Demand Media

    Demand Media, Inc. (NYSE: DMD) is a leading digital media and domain name services company that informs and entertains one of the internet’s largest audiences, helps advertisers find innovative ways to engage with their customers and enables publishers, individuals and businesses to expand their online presence. Headquartered in Santa Monica, CA, Demand Media has offices in North America, South America and Europe. For more information about Demand Media, please visit www.demandmedia.com.

    About Rightside

    Rightside™ inspires and delivers new possibilities for consumers and businesses to define and present themselves online. The company, with its affiliates, is a leading provider of domain name services, offering one of the industry’s most comprehensive platforms for the discovery, registration, development, and monetization of domain names. This includes 15 million names under management, the most widely used domain name reseller platform, more than 20,000 distribution partners, an award-winning retail registrar, the leading domain name auction service through its NameJet joint venture and an interest in more than 100 new Top Level Domain registry operator agreements or applications through Rightside affiliate, United TLD Holdco Limited, trading as Rightside Registry. Following its planned separation from Demand Media, Rightside will be home to some of the most admired brands in the industry, including eNomName.com, andNameJet (in partnership with Web.com). Headquartered in Kirkland, WA, Rightside has offices in North America, Europe and Australia. For more information please visitwww.rightside.co.

    Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regarding the Company’s future financial performance, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, financial condition, operating performance and results of operations, including certain assumptions related thereto. Statements containing words such as guidance, may, believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, project, projections, business outlook, and estimate or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Potential risks and uncertainties that could affect our operating and financial results are described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (http://www.sec.gov) on March 5, 2013,as such risks and uncertainties may be updated in our annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, information under the captions Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These risks and uncertainties include, among others: our ability to complete a separation of our business into two separate public companies and unanticipated developments that may delay or negatively impact such a transaction; the possibility that we may decide not to proceed with the separation of our business as previously announced if we determine that alternative opportunities are more favorable to our stockholders; the impact and possible disruption to our operations from pursuing the separation transaction; the expectation that the separation transaction will be tax-free; revenue and growth expectations for the two independent companies, and the ability of each company to operate as an independent entity, following the separation transaction; changes in the methodologies of internet search engines, including ongoing algorithmic changes made by Google as well as possible future changes, and the impact such changes may have on page view growth and driving search related traffic to our owned & operated websites and the websites of our network customers; the impact of product and ad format changes to improve user experience; changes in our content creation and distribution platform, including the possible repurposing of content to alternate distribution channels, reduced investments in intangible assets or the sale or removal of content; our ability to successfully grow adjacent lines of business such as commerce and content solutions as part of our growth strategy; the effects of shifting consumption of media content from desktop to mobile; our ability to successfully pursue and implement our gTLD initiative; our dependence on material agreements with a specific business partner for a significant portion of our revenue; changes in amortization or depreciation expense due to a variety of factors; potential write downs, reserves against or impairment of assets including receivables, goodwill, intangibles (including media content) or other assets; and our ability to retain key personnel. From time to time, we may consider acquisitions or divestitures that, if consummated, could be material. Any forward-looking statements regarding financial metrics are based upon the assumption that no such acquisition or divestiture is consummated during the relevant periods. If an acquisition or divestiture were consummated, actual results could differ materially from any forward-looking statements. The Company does not intend to revise or update the information set forth in this press release, except as required by law, and may not provide this type of information in the future.

    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries

    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year endedDecember 31,
    2013 2012 2013 2012
    Revenue $ 96,661 $ 103,142 $ 394,598 $ 380,578
    Operating expenses:
    Service costs (exclusive of amortization of intangible assets shown separately below)(1) (2) 55,127 48,865 204,763 181,018
    Sales and marketing (1) (2) 9,587 12,823 46,445 46,501
    Product development (1) (2) 10,920 9,719 44,187 40,708
    General and administrative (1) (2) 18,677 16,171 73,277 63,025
    Amortization of intangible assets 13,685 9,460 44,409 40,676
    Total operating expenses 107,996 97,038 413,081 371,928
    Income (loss) from operations (11,335 ) 6,104 (18,483 ) 8,650
    Interest income 5 8 21 42
    Interest expense (668 ) (157 ) (1,642 ) (622 )
    Other income (expense), net (12 ) (34 ) (61 ) (111 )
    Gain on sale of assets 1,666 4,232
    Income (loss) before income taxes (10,344 ) 5,921 (15,933 ) 7,959
    Income tax expense (1,177 ) (1,172 ) (4,241 ) (1,783 )
    Net income (loss) $ (11,521 ) $ 4,749 $ (20,174 ) $ 6,176
     
    (1) Stock-based compensation expense included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 700 $ 679 $ 2,778 $ 2,820
    Sales and marketing 851 1,597 5,328 6,118
    Product development 1,084 1,283 5,186 6,452
    General and administrative 3,120 3,823   14,092 15,978
    Total stock-based compensation expense $ 5,755 $ 7,382 $ 27,384 $ 31,368
    (2) Depreciation expense included in the line items above:
    Service costs $ 3,352 $ 3,663 $ 14,213 $ 14,452
    Sales and marketing 84 108 379 453
    Product development 203 238 865 1,025
    General and administrative 1,527 1,025 5,044 3,728
    Total depreciation expense $ 5,166 $ 5,034 $ 20,501 $ 19,658
    Net income (loss) per share – basic $ (0.13 ) $ 0.06 $ (0.23 ) $ 0.07
    Net income (loss) per share – diluted $ (0.13 ) $ 0.05 $ (0.23 ) $ 0.07
    Weighted average number of shares – basic 90,310 86,140 88,534 84,553
    Weighted average number of shares – diluted 90,310 88,444 88,534 87,237
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In thousands)
    December 31,
    2013
    December 31,
    2012
    Assets
    Current assets
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 153,511 $ 102,933
    Accounts receivable, net 33,301 45,517
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets 7,826 6,041
    Deferred registration costs 66,273 57,718
    Total current assets 260,911 212,209
    Property and equipment, net 42,193 35,467
    Intangible assets, net 88,766 91,746
    Goodwill 347,382 266,349
    Deferred registration costs, less current portion 12,514 11,320
    Other long-term assets 25,322 20,906
    Total assets $ 777,088 $ 637,997
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
    Current liabilities
    Accounts payable $ 12,814 $ 10,471
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 34,679 40,489
    Deferred tax liabilities 22,415 18,892
    Current portion of long-term debt 15,000
    Deferred revenue 84,955 75,142
    Total current liabilities 169,863 144,994
    Deferred revenue, less current portion 16,929 15,965
    Long-term debt 81,250
    Other liabilities 13,041 4,847
    Stockholders’ equity
    Common stock and additional paid-in capital 611,039 562,703
    Treasury stock (30,767 ) (25,932 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income 502 15
    Accumulated deficit (84,769 ) (64,595 )
    Total stockholders’ equity 496,005 472,191
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 777,088 $ 637,997
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 2013 2012
    Cash flows from operating activities:
    Net income (loss) $ (11,521 ) $ 4,749 $ (20,174 ) $ 6,176
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization 18,851 14,494 64,910 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 5,755 7,382 27,384 31,368
    Gain on other assets, net (1,666 ) (4,232 )
    Other 691 1,134 3,038 1,717
    Net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions (2,375 ) (1,722 ) 5,237 (8,612 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities 9,735 26,037 76,163 90,983
    Cash flows from investing activities:
    Purchases of property and equipment (3,986 ) (5,283 ) (26,746 ) (17,708 )
    Purchases of intangibles (3,509 ) (4,647 ) (16,772 ) (13,237 )
    Proceeds from gTLD withdrawals, net 2,740 5,616
    Payments for gTLD applications, net (3,546 ) (16,200 ) (3,949 ) (18,202 )
    Cash paid for acquisitions (397 ) (73,626 ) (17,480 )
    Change in restricted cash (855 )
    Other 473 942
    Net cash used in investing activities (8,225 ) (26,130 ) (114,535 ) (67,482 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:
    Long-term debt borrowings 50,000 120,000
    Long-term debt repayments (3,750 ) (23,750 )
    Debt issuance costs (1,936 ) (144 )
    Repurchases of common stock (4,913 ) (4,835 ) (8,869 )
    Proceeds from exercises of stock options and contributions to ESPP 253 1,451 4,746 12,467
    Net taxes paid on RSUs vesting and options exercised (834 ) (6,151 ) (4,575 ) (9,496 )
    Other (180 ) (258 ) (620 ) (524 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 45,489 (9,871 ) 89,030 (6,566 )
    Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents (17 ) (19 ) (80 ) (37 )
    Change in cash and cash equivalents 46,982 (9,983 ) 50,578 16,898
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 106,529 112,916 102,933 86,035
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 153,511 $ 102,933 $ 153,511 $ 102,933
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 2013 2012
    Revenue ex-TAC:
    Content & Media revenue $ 58,022 $ 68,633 $ 246,397 $ 246,399
    Less: traffic acquisition costs (TAC) (2,644 ) (6,332 ) (15,989 ) (19,441 )
    Content & Media Revenue ex-TAC 55,378 62,301 230,408 226,958
    Registrar revenue 38,639 34,509 148,201 134,179
    Total Revenue ex-TAC $ 94,017 $ 96,810 $ 378,609 $ 361,137
    Adjusted EBITDA:
    Net income (loss) $ (11,521 ) $ 4,749 $ (20,174 ) $ 6,176
    Income tax expense 1,177 1,172 4,241 1,783
    Interest and other expense, net 675 183 1,682 691
    Gain on gTLD application withdrawals, net(1) (1,666 ) (4,232 )
    Depreciation and amortization 18,851 14,494 64,910 60,334
    Stock-based compensation 5,755 7,382 27,384 31,368
    Acquisition and realignment costs(2) 1,880 314 6,113 446
    gTLD expense(3) 2,875 1,061 8,428 2,650
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 18,026 $ 29,355 $ 88,352 $ 103,448
    Discretionary and Total Free Cash Flow:
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 9,735 $ 26,037 $ 76,163 $ 90,983
    Purchases of property and equipment (3,986 ) (5,283 ) (26,746 ) (17,708 )
    Acquisition and realignment cash flows(2) 2,861 25 4,587 25
    gTLD expense cash flows(3) 3,239 974 7,152 2,198
    Discretionary Free Cash Flow 11,849 21,753 61,156 75,498
    Purchases of intangible assets (3,509 ) (4,647 ) (16,772 ) (13,237 )
    Free Cash Flow $ 8,340 $ 17,106 $ 44,384 $ 62,261
    Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS:
    Net income (loss) $ (11,521 ) $ 4,749 $ (20,174 ) $ 6,176
    (a) Stock-based compensation 5,755 7,382 27,384 31,368
    (b) Amortization of intangible assets – M&A 3,872 2,572 13,162 10,904
    (c) Content intangible assets removed from service 2,387 237 2,453 2,055
    (d) Acquisition and realignment costs(2) 1,880 314 6,113 446
    (e) Gain on gTLD application withdrawals, net(1) (1,666 ) (4,232 )
    (f) gTLD expense(3) 2,875 1,061 8,428 2,650
    (g) Income tax effect of items (a) – (f) & application of 38% statutory tax rate to pre-tax income (632 ) (5,473 ) (9,962 ) (19,262 )
    Adjusted Net Income $ 2,951 $ 10,842 $ 23,173 $ 34,337
    Adjusted EPS – diluted $ 0.03 $ 0.12 $ 0.26 $ 0.39
    Shares used to calculate Adjusted EPS – diluted 90,911 88,444 89,428 87,237
    (1) Net gains on withdrawals of interest in gTLD applications, included in gain on other assets, net.
    (2) Acquisition and realignment costs include such items, when applicable, as (a) non-cash GAAP purchase accounting adjustments for certain deferred revenue and costs, (b) legal, accounting and other professional fees directly attributable to acquisition activity, (c) employee severance payments attributable to acquisition or corporate realignment activities and (d) expenditures related to the separation of Demand Media into two distinct publicly traded companies. Management does not consider these costs to be indicative of the Company’s core operating results.
    (3) Comprises formation expenses directly related to the Company’s gTLD initiative that did not generate associated revenue in 2013 or 2012.
    Demand Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Unaudited GAAP Revenue, by Revenue Source
    (In thousands)
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 2013 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites $ 46,127 $ 48,796 $ 195,546 $ 178,511
    Network of customer websites 11,895 19,837 50,851 67,888
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 58,022 68,633 246,397 246,399
    Registrar 38,639 34,509 148,201 134,179
    Total Revenue $ 96,661 $ 103,142 $ 394,598 $ 380,578
    Three months ended
    December 31,
    Year ended
    December 31,
    2013 2012 2013 2012
    Content & Media:
    Owned and operated websites 48 % 48 % 49 % 47 %
    Network of customer websites 12 % 19 % 13 % 18 %
    Total Revenue – Content & Media 60 % 67 % 62 % 65 %
    Registrar 40 % 33 % 38 % 35 %
    Total Revenue 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

     

    Source: Demand Media, Inc.

    Images via Demand Media

  • Google To Well-Established Sites: Don’t Coast On Your Laurels

    Google has released some new advice to webmasters of well-established businesses with domains that have been around for a long time. Keep up with the times, or you’ll be left behind.

    Said advice comes in the form of a “Webmaster Help” video from head of webspam, Matt Cutts. A webmaster asked, “I have been in business for over 14 years with my domain, and see much newer domains passing me. Any algorithms to protect older domains/sites in business from newer sites with more spam?”

    Cutts decided to “answer a slightly different question,” leaving off the “more spam” and simply focusing on the older domains vs. newer domains aspect.

    “The advice that I’d give to you as the owner of a site that’s been around for fourteen years is to take a fresh look at your site,” he says. “A lot of times if you land on your site, and you land on a random website from a search result, you know, even if they’ve been in business for fifteen years, fourteen years, sometimes they haven’t updated their template or their page layout or anything in years and years and years, and it looks, frankly, like sort of a stale sort of an older site, and that’s the sort of thing where users might not be as happy about that.”

    “And so if you do run an older site or a very well-established site, I wouldn’t just coast on your laurels,” he adds. “I wouldn’t just say, ‘Well I’m number one for now, and everything is great,’ because newer sites, more agile sites, more hungry sites, more sites that have a better user experience – they can grow, and they can eclipse you if you don’t continue to adapt, and evolve, and move with the times. So I wouldn’t say just because you are a domain that’s well-established or has been around for a long time, you will automatically keep ranking. We’ve seen plenty of newer domains and businesses bypass older domains.”

    Of course it’s unclear whether or not the person asking the question actually had an old, stale site. There are over 200 signals Google takes into account, but “keeping up with the times” is clearly going to have to be something businesses need to consider if they hope to maintain a significant online presence.

    This probably doesn’t necessarily mean complete design overhauls every year, but perhaps some gradual tweaking is in order as time goes on. What are those outranking you doing better than you?

    Image via YouTube

  • Demand Media Further Prepares For Rightside Domain Spin-Off

    Demand Media announced that it has filed a Form 10 registration statement with the SEC in preparation for the spin-off of its domain services business, which it recently announced would be called Rightside.

    “The Form 10 filing marks another key milestone for the planned separation and spin-off in 2014, as we have steadily been making progress in establishing Rightside as a leading player in the domain name services industry,” said Shawn Colo, Demand Media’s Interim President and CEO who will also be a Director of Rightside following the separation.

    Rightside also announced that it has hired a new CFO and Head of Marketing – Tracy Knox and Kelly Johnson respectively.

    “We are excited to welcome Tracy and Kelly to the Rightside team. They will play important roles in helping to accelerate company growth and build brand awareness,” said Taryn Naidu, who will become CEO of Rightside. “Each brings a wealth of experience, innovative thinking and strong leadership skills that will prove invaluable at a time when we are bringing to market our first new gTLD extensions. They will round out the seasoned executive team in place today and be an integral part of our success as we help usher in this new era of the Internet.”

    Knox will lead the company’s financial operations including accounting and financial reporting, treasury and investor relations. Johnson will oversee all marketing and strategic branding efforts for the Rightside brand.

    Image via Rightside

  • Google: Your Various ccTLDs Will Probably Be Fine From The Same IP Address

    Ever wondered if Google would mind if you had multiple ccTLD sites hosted from a single IP address? If you’re afraid they might not take kindly to that, you’re in for some good news. It’s not really that big a deal.

    Google’s Matt Cutts may have just saved you some time and money with this one. He takes on the following submitted question in the latest Webmaster Help video:

    For one customer we have about a dozen individual websites for different countries and languages, with different TLDs under one IP number. Is this okay for Google or do you prefer one IP number per country TLD?

    “In an ideal world, it would be wonderful if you could have, for every different .co.uk, .com, .fr, .de, if you could have a different, separate IP address for each one of those, and have them each placed in the UK, or France, or Germany, or something like that,” says Cutts. “But in general, the main thing is, as long as you have different country code top level domains, we are able to distinguish between them. So it’s definitely not the end of the world if you need to put them all on one IP address. We do take the top-level domain as a very strong indicator.”

    “So if it’s something where it’s a lot of money or it’s a lot of hassle to set that sort of thing up, I wouldn’t worry about it that much,” he adds. “Instead, I’d just go ahead and say, ‘You know what? I’m gonna go ahead and have all of these domains on one IP address, and just let the top-level domain give the hint about what country it’s in. I think it should work pretty well either way.”

    While on the subject, you might want to listen to what Cutts had to say about location and ccTLDs earlier this year in another video.

  • Webmasters Think Google Has Eased Up On EMD Sites

    Back in 2012, Google launched the EMD update, which the company described as a small update, affecting 0.6% of English-US queries to a noticeable degree. It was designed to demote low quality exact match domain sites.

    We don’t really hear that much about the update anymore, but there were quite a few complaints from webmasters hit by it when it launched.

    There is some new discussion in the webmaster community with people thinking Google has eased up on this repeating update.

    Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points to some chatter in the Webmaster Word forum, and more people chimed in in the comments of his post saying they’ve been seeing more EMD sites ranking for various industry-specific searches.

    Gareth Miller suggests that they didn’t really punish low quality EMD sites, calling it “another case of Google doing something and then exaggerating its impact to discourage spammers from pursuing the tactic”

    I don’t know. I wouldn’t say Google exaggerated it, considering they said it was small to begin with, though I’m sure he has a valid point about Google discouraging spammers.

    Apparently, if these sites are appearing as frequently as some say, it didn’t discourage them enough.

    Of course there are plenty of EMD sites that do offer quality content, and deserve to rank just as much as the next site. We talked about this with Todd Malicoat (aka: Stuntdubl) last year.

    Image: DenverLawyers.com

  • This Small Company Is Battling Amazon For The Next .COM

    XYZ.com is bringing the new domain extensions .xyz and .College to the Internet as part of the new gTLD program. It’s also in a battle with Amazon and others to bring .Now to market.

    Do you expect to get any domains with new gTLDs? Anything in particular you’re leaning toward? Let us know in the comments.

    The company consists of a small team of about five people battling against giants like Amazon, Google and Donuts. Co-founder Daniel Negari is the youngest gTLD applicant at 27 years old. The company is prviately funded by its co-founders, and has been going through the application process for a few years.

    The company wants .XYZ to be the next .COM, as opposed to going after niche markets like some of the other players launching new gTLDs. We had a conversation with Negari about where the new gTLDs will take the Internet, and what role XYZ.com aims to play in that.

    “The new TLDs offer Internet users choice when selecting a domain name,” he says. “There are currently over 250 million domain names registered in the world, and almost half of them are .coms. That means it’s nearly impossible for people to register their first, second, or maybe even 5th choice in a domain name, without paying potentially thousands of dollars.”

    “Overall, we will see a lot of success from the new domain extensions because it is a win-win situation, especially for the average website user,” he adds. “The Internet has only existed for 24 years and is still in its infancy. The new extensions are a huge step towards getting more people online and leveraging all of the potential opportunities of being constantly connected to a stream of data, news, and information.”

    Asked about the benefits to a business or webmaster in choosing a .XYZ domain over something else, Negari tells WebProNews, “.xyz is a low-cost, high-volume domain extension for every website, everywhere. Anybody can register the domain name they really want at a competitive price (we expect the base MSRP to be under $9.99).”

    One important consideration in selecting domains for those who want global sites is using characters that are global themselves.

    “.xyz makes sense as a globally adoptable domain extension since X, Y, and Z are recognized as the last three letters of the Latin alphabet,” says Negari. “There is no language barrier, unlike most other extensions, since XYZ serves more as a universal symbol than an English word with a dictionary meaning. It is also three letters like other popular extensions today, like .com, .net, and .org.”

    “With .xyz, users are not limited or labeled by their domain extension,” he says. “As a flexible, ‘true generic’ extension, people can register .xyz domain names for any purpose and receive instant recognition. We have coined the phrase ‘Generation XYZ.’ This is the idea of combining the three major generations (Generations X, Y, and Z) to create a whole new generation inspired by the Internet and its limitless potential. We are introducing .xyz to the world so that people everywhere can sure their passions, cultivate knowledge, and express themselves. We think of .xyz as more than just a domain extension – it is a global community.”

    As Negari points out, a lot of the new extensions coming out are very niche-specific, which makes them less valuable to some types of businesses and websites. Selecting such a domain has a several consequences, he says.

    “First, because these domain extensions are not necessarily meant to be high-volume, they may have a higher price tag than true generic extensions (for example, .pw starts at $20, .pro starts at $26, and .tv starts at $30 on eNom),” he says. “Second, by getting a domain name with a niche extension, users are able [to] easily convey what type of website they are or the industry they are in. But what if they are in multiple markets? Or if there are multiple domain extensions with the same meaning (like .store and .shopping; .car, .cars, .auto, and .autos), people may get confused and visit the wrong site. Although there are obvious benefits in getting a niche extension, not all users want to be boxed in.”

    “Third, because of these natural market limitations, most niche extensions may never see widespread adoption,” he adds. “While a specific extension may be best suited for a certain type of user, it can hurt the brand’s perceived reputation by having a domain name that isn’t immediately recognizable. Eventually, some of these users may choose to switch to something more popular.”

    In addition to .XYZ, XYZ.com is launching the .College TLD, which obviously carries more of a niche connotation – one of education. One might expect this to compete with .EDU.

    “.edu is a very specialized and exclusive domain extension, with only about 7,000 domain names registered,” Negari explains. “Only US accredited universities are able to register .edu domain names. And even they are limited to one .edu domain name per institution. That means universities can’t get individual .edu domain names for their colleges (approximately 18 on average per university), departments, campus programs, and staff. .College addresses this need, in addition to many others.”

    “There are over 30,000 recognized colleges and universities in the world, which means about 23,000 are not able to register their institutions name under the .edu extension,” he says. “.College is a global education-related domain extension meant to create greater consistency in institutional presence online all over the world.”

    “But .College isn’t just for schools,” Negari notes. “It is a 100% and unrestricted domain extension, meaning anyone can register a .College domain name for any purpose. It can be used by an unlimited number of organizations and individuals, including non-traditional education, tutoring services, online education, corporate training, recruitment, test preparation, events, special interest groups, university research parks, startups, and students.”

    For some reason, Hamburger University comes to mind.

    XYZ.com expects a million registrations for .XYZ domains in the TLD’s first year of existence.

    “We have done extensive market research and analysis to determine how we can best position .xyz to succeed and maximize accessibility to all Internet users,” says Negari. “We understand how big the market is, and we have detailed strategies in place to attract individuals and organizations in every major industry.”

    “Ultimately, we believe widespread adoption stems from ensuring affordability, generating early brand awareness, and connecting with the people all over the world who are interested in .xyz,” he says. “We are a small but experienced team playing the underdog role against big players like Amazon, and I think users appreciate our bold, expressive style.”

    The company is marketing the TLD globally, and says it has received a lot of positive feedback from users around the world, but especially in countries with high internet usage and growth. Negari specifically names the US, Germany, China, India, and Canada. XYZ.COM itself is currently available in English, German, and Spanish, with Chinese, and will launch in other languages soon.

    “Our preregistration tracking is in line with the timelines we have in place, and we expect these numbers to continue to increase, especially as we begin to go deeper into our multi-million dollar marketing campaign in the coming months,” Negari tells us. “My team and I have developed numerous longstanding relationships in the domain name industry with a very strong understanding of the market. We have acquired and sold over $100 million in domain names. We have already have registry operating experience after successfully launching .com.de.”

    “ICANN has offered their key support and endorsement of our domain extension. .xyz has everything in place – capital, expertise, support, brand positioning, and dedication – to become a major innovator on the internet as it continues grow at an exponential rate,” he says.

    While XYZ.com is still competing with five other applicants (including Amazon) for the .NOW TLD, it has already created a .Now website and Twitter account in preparation for the acquisition, as the company expects to win the auction.

    “.Now is one of the few three-letter words that has the flexibility to be used across all industries and activities, and is generally a term understood by most people, even if they don’t speak English,” Negari says. “.Now is for companies who are trying to incite customers to action (i.e. buyit.now). But it can also be used for fundraising, events, interest groups, content sharing, or anything else people can think up. It’s can be instantly applicable to just about anything.”

    “It makes sense for a large retailer like Amazon to be attracted to .Now domain names because it can be applied to multiple verticals, like general e-commerce, their new grocery delivery service, music and video downloads, and for their Android app store,” he notes.

    Negari is excited, however, to be able to go head to head with giants at such a young age, and with such a small company.

    What business benefits do you see to new gTLDs? Discuss in the comments.

  • Yahoo Is Auctioning Off These ‘Premium’ Domain Names (Stuff Like Sandwich.com And Religious.net)

    Yahoo just announced that it is auctioning off over a hundred “premium” domain names.

    “When you’re a company that’s been around as long as Yahoo, there are lots of fun things that you stumble across,” says Kevin Kramer, Deputy General Counsel for Yahoo. “This year, we found a huge list of domain names that the company has owned for quite some time.”

    “As we discussed what to do with them, it became obvious that it was time to set them free…back into the wild of the Internet. Surely, creative people, businesses and entrepreneurs could come up with something great to do with them. They could even spark some brand new ideas or companies.”

    Here are 29 domains Yahoo is currently listing on Sedo:

    ChillerTheater.com
    WebServer.com
    TheBroadcastNetwork.com
    FinalCountdown.com
    Vivas.com
    Sandwich.com
    Transmissions.com
    Crackers.com
    Cursed.com
    CyberJokes.com
    GlobalWhoIs.com
    Westerns.com
    Laun.com
    Batoota.com
    Sled.com
    JumpCut.com
    DotBank.com
    iRecruiter.com
    PoliceScanner.com
    WebCal.com
    Fonzo.com
    Religious.net
    Jockeys.com
    MYM.com
    Raging.com
    BlogSport.com
    AirTrafficControl.com
    TrueStory.com
    AV.com

    Presumably, we’ll see the rest in time. Prices for these range from $1,000 to $1.5 million.

    Now, feel free to speculate about why Yahoo owns AirTrafficControl.com.

  • Demand Media Names Domain Services Business, CEO

    Demand Media announced today that it has a new brand name for its soon-to-be spun off domain services business, and it has appointed a CEO to run it.

    The new brand will be Rightside, and the CEO will be current Demand Media EVP of Domain Services, Taryn Naidu. Wayne MacLaurin will serve as CTO and Rick Danis as General Counsel. David Panos will be appointed Chairman of the Board, and and Shawn Colo, Demand Media’s Interim President and CEO, will be appointed as a Director of Rightside in connection with the separation.

    Demand Media announced the resignation of CEO and Chairman Richard Rosenblatt last month.

    “Establishing the leadership team and brand identity of the proposed new company marks an important milestone in achieving our plan to separate our business into two distinct market leaders,” said Colo. “I am pleased to announce a very strong executive team led by Taryn. This team has a wealth of industry experience, has played an integral role in building the largest wholesale domain registrar and is driving the transformation of this business into one of the largest end-to-end domain name service providers in the world.”

    “Rightside’s mission will be to help millions of businesses and consumers define and present themselves online. We’re able to deliver on this through our distribution network of more than 20,000 active partners, one of the leading domain services technology platforms, a large number of applications for new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs), and a deep bench of industry talent,” said Naidu. “It’s an exciting time for us, as new gTLDs start going live this year and our path to becoming an independent public company as a leader in our industry progresses.”

    Last week, Demand Media announced that its United TLD subsidiary became an ICANN accredited gTLD registry, that its eNom and Name.com have signed the 2013 ICANN RAA, and that the company has joined the newly launched Domain Name Association.

    Rightside will be based in Kirkland, Washington. It includes eNom, Name.com, United TLD and NameJet.

    Upon Rosenblatt’s resignation, the company indicated that it was still evaluating the timing of the spin-off. The company will no doubt have some comments about it on Thursday when it shares its Q3 financials.

  • Demand Media Announces Significant Steps For Domain Business

    Demand Media has a few pieces of domain-related news this morning. Its United TLD subsidiary is now officially an ICANN accredited gTLD registry, eNom and Name.com have signed the 2013 ICANN RAA, and the company has joined the Domain Name Association.

    Regarding the first two bits of news, a spokesperson for the company tells WebProNews, “These are significant steps forward in preparing the domain services business for over a thousand new domain name extensions coming to market – starting as early as later this year.”

    “The speculation is over. New gTLDs are coming to market before the year ends and, with these ICANN contracts, Demand Media is ready to go as both a platform through which these names will be available, as well as bringing specific new gTLDs such as .DANCE and .DEMOCRAT to market,” said Taryn Naidu, executive vice president of Domain Services for the company. “We made a commitment to our business partners and customers that we would lead the way in opening up a new form of expression on the web – and we are delivering.”

    New domain extensions will begin to come online in November. Others from United TLD will include .ACTOR, .ARMY, .ENGINEER, .NINJA, .PUB and .SOCIAL.

    Of the RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement), Demand Media senior vice president and vice-chair of ICANN’s Registrar Stakeholder Group, Jeff Eckhaus, said, “This process was truly community driven and collectively organized; we worked to ensure that everything we did would better serve the customer – the person or organization registering a domain name. By signing on to the RAA, both eNom and Name.com have proven that they are fully prepared to support new gTLDs as they come to market in the months ahead.”

    As noted, Demand Media has also joined the Domain Name Association (DNA). This is a new nonprofit that launched today to support the growth and development of the domain name industry. Board members include Eckhaus, United TLD’s Statton Hammock, ARI’s Adrian Kinderis (Chair), Google’s Job Lawrence, Donuts’ Jon Nevett, FairWinds Partners’ Elizabeth Sweezey and GoDaddy’s Richard Merdinger.

    Earlier this month, Demand Media announced that longtime CEO Richard Rosenblatt was stepping down, but indicated that its plan to separate the domain business from the media business is still going forward, though the timing was still being evaluated.

    Last week, ICANN introduced the first four new gTLDs.

    Image: Demand Media

  • GoDaddy Announces That It Acquired Ronin Back In April

    Domains giant GoDaddy announced on Wednesday that it has acquired Ronin, an online bookkeeping company.

    Interestingly, the acquisition was made all the way back in April, and the company has since fully integrated Ronin into GoDaddy Online Bookkeeping. The product combines Ronin with the company’s previous acquisition of Outright.com.

    “One of our primary goals is to make the ‘business of business’ easy, and GoDaddy Online Bookkeeping does that by taking the headache out of knowing their numbers,” said GoDaddy Senior Vice President, Business Applications Steven Aldrich. “Our customers love our product – but they wanted us to provide invoicing capabilities. We knew Ronin provided an unparalleled experience, so we started discussions. It soon became clear – we needed the team at Ronin to be on our team and we needed to seamlessly integrate invoicing into our product. The end result is GoDaddy Online Bookkeeping.”

    “GoDaddy and Ronin share a vision of giving small businesses the best tools to succeed online,” said Ronin Founder Lu Wang. “The ease and speed of integrating with GoDaddy’s culture and technology, combined with the ability to reach 12 million customers, is a tremendous opportunity. Joining the GoDaddy team has given us the access to the resources and smart people who we’ve wanted.”

    The acquisition of Ronin marks five for GoDaddy in fifteen months. Others, in addition to Outright, include M.dot, Locu and Afternic. GoDaddy says each one was tapped because of their small business elements, which is line with GoDaddy’s newly revamped strategy targeting small businesses.

    Terms of the Ronin deal were not disclosed.

    Image: GoDaddy

  • Pinterest Wins Complaint Against ‘Serial Cybersquatter’

    Pinterest Wins Complaint Against ‘Serial Cybersquatter’

    Pinterest has won an injunction against a known cybersquatter who will be forced to give up the rights to over 100 domains that utilize pinterest.com typos to direct users away from Pinterest.com, and to his own locations filled with ads and spammy links.

    Qian Jan reportedly registered over 100 domains – mostly Pinterest typos – like “pinterests.com” and “ponterest.com.” Pinterest filed the complaint last year.

    Pinterest demanded an injunction that would transfer all ownership of the offending domains, as well as monetary damages. The San Francisco judge ruled in Pinterest’s favor, granting the injunction and damages – although not the entire amount that Pinterest requested.

    According to court documents the defendant in the case, Qin Jian is a “serial cybersquatter” who has “registered and owns hundreds of domain names that are very similar to the mark of several large companies.

    Of course, Pinterest’s claims was that Jian’s various instances of “typosquatting” hurt their bottom line, directing millions of potential visitors away from their site.

    According to All Things D, Pinterest was awarded $7.2 million in damages out of a possible $12 million.

    “This is a good outcome for the people who use Pinterest. We’ll continue to work to protect pinners and our trademarks,” said a Pinterest spokesperson.

    2013 09 30 [20] Order Granting Default Judgment Against Defendant in Re …

    Of course, Pinterest isn’t the first company to file and succeed in such disputes (companies have a pretty good track record with this). Both Facebook and Google have won such cybersquatting cases over the past few years.