WebProNews

Tag: content farms

  • Don’t Expect a Lot of eHow Content to Be Removed from YouTube

    Demand Media shared with WebProNews, some further insights into its content strategy on the video side of things. In light of the recent discussions surrounding Google’s Panda update, and its impacts on YouTube and Demand Media, we thought it would be worth taking a closer look at the relationship these enormous web entities have with one another.

    YouTube was a clear winner (along with other Google properties and other video sites) after the Panda update. Various Demand Media properties were impacted negatively, and the company announced last week that its flagship eHow property experienced a 20% decline in search referrals following the update. It’s interesting that YouTube would go up, and eHow would go down, considering that earlier this year (as the company’s IPO approached), Demand Media CEO Richard Rosenblatt told All Things Digital’s Peter Kafka, “We’re the largest supplier of all video to YouTube, over two billion views…”

    Quinn Daly, Demand Media’s SVP, Corporate Communications, tells WebProNews that while it is Demand Media (not just eHow) that is the biggest supplier of video to YouTube, it is the company’s Expert Village brand that has the largest number of videos from Demand Media on YouTube.

    Of course the Expert Village brand has been rolled into eHow. If you go to ExpertVillage.com, you’ll be greeted with an eHow header, and the following message:

    Liked Expert Village? You’re gonna love eHow.

    All of the Expert Village videos you’ve come to count on now live at eHow.com – and that’s only the beginning. With two million articles and videos, plus a supportive community, eHow empowers you with the kind of help and advice you need to accomplish your goals each day.

    Expert Village YouTube channel

    On the Expert Village YouTube channel, it shows 1,898,439,921 total upload views. The eHow channel boasts 112,350,956 total upload views. Based on my own experiences, eHow-branded videos seem to appear more frequently in Google search results. This is just an observation, however, and is inconclusive.

    Last week, Demand Media held its quarterly earnings call, and announced some new clean-up efforts around its content strategy, and eHow in particular. These efforts include the deletion of some articles, and further editing of others. This content comes from Demand Media’s writers’ compensation program, a user-generated content effort, which the company has now completely shut down. Much of this content is/was on eHow.

    Given that Demand Media is the biggest supplier of video to YouTube, and that Google has taken some criticism on how YouTube has performed following the Panda update (criticism namely from HubPage CEO Paul Edmondson), we wondered if Demand Media was pulling any videos in these new efforts.

    Daly tells us, “The efforts around UGC content on eHow.com were primarily articles. There was a short time that people could also upload videos as well but we removed that function. None of that UGC content was distributed on YT.”

    “There are no UGC videos from the WCP program on YT; so in that context, there is no content coming down,” she says. “That said, the body of work on YT is always changing; we are adding new video and working to review older content that may no longer meet our quality standards, so I can’t say that there will be NO content coming down from YT because that wouldn’t be accurate.”

    YouTube recently dropped an interesting stat, in that 30% of YouTube videos make up 99% of views. Edmondson is bringing Google’s competitive practices into the Panda conversation, at a time when Google faces regulatory scrutiny over them.

  • Demand Media Announces 20% Decline in eHow Search Referrals Due to Panda

    Demand Media Announces 20% Decline in eHow Search Referrals Due to Panda

    As you may know, Demand Media released its quarterly earnings report, reporting an increase in revenue (including for its content business specifically), and even a 32% increase in pageviews. In addition to that, the company made some new announcements about how it intends to continue its quest to increase quality of content. More on these here:

    Demand Media Earnings Report – Revenue Up, Questions Remain
    Demand Media Deletes eHow Articles, Edits Others in Quality Clean-up Initiative

    After the report, Demand Media held its earnings call, in which Richard Rosenblatt talked about the company’s news some more. He also referenced the Google Panda update. He kept it brief, but said they experienced a net decline of 20% in eHow search referrals due to changes, and a decline of 12% in total pageviews for eHow. This followed an unexpected spike in Q1 traffic from the initial algorithm change (the original U.S. update).

    “This is a real impact to our business and we take it very seriously,” he said.

    Rosenblatt promised to keep everyone up to date on the progress in the next earnings call. Meanwhile, the new strategies aimed at boosting content quality may help. We’ll see. Keep in mind, they’re also deleting some content.

    Demand Media stock is up in afternoon trading. It’s currently at 16.31 as of the time of this writing.

    Clarification: We originally referred to the 20% as “traffic” when it should have been “search referral traffic” specifically.

  • Demand Media Deletes eHow Articles, Edits Others in Quality Clean-up Initiative

    Demand Media Deletes eHow Articles, Edits Others in Quality Clean-up Initiative

    It’s a big day for Demand Media, with that earnings report and all. It will be very interesting to see how the stock goes.

    We had the opportunity to chat with Larry Fitzgibbon, Demand Media’s EVP, Media and Operations, and Jeremy Reed, SVP, Content & Editorial ahead of the company’s earnings call and they shared some news beyond the financials with us. They all have to do with increasing the quality of content on the company’s properties (namely eHow).

    For one, the company is totally ditching its writers’ compensation program. The shut down of the program was actually announced last year, but today, they announced that they’re shutting it down entirely. Some of the content will get taken down, and some of it will be put back through the Demand Studios editing process. In some cases, Fitzgibbon tells us, writers had solid content, while in others had content that just didn’t “meet the quality bar” on editorial guidelines. This program dates back to shortly after the company first acquired eHow. Much of the content has remained out there in the wild – in search results – not doing much in the way of positively influencing perception about the site’s quality.

    The company has been rigorously trying to get that perception up, and while it’s not always immediately clear whether a piece of content came from this program, the perception should indeed be raised, if less-than-stellar content appears less frequently in Google’s search results. The site was of course already hit by the Panda update, and this is no doubt a move aimed at improvements in that area – at least in part. The company would not comment on the Google side of things specifically, but you can put the pieces of the puzzle together.

    eHow recently launched a redesign with a new “curation layer” aimed at providing feedback from users to the company so content can be further analyzed in terms of how helpful it is, and then either be removed or put back into the editorial process for improvements. They didn’t have any numbers to reveal, in terms of just how much positive/negative feedback they’re receiving, other than to say, “We’re getting hundreds of thousands of pieces of feedback.” Fitzgibbon did comment that they don’t necessarily look at it as positive/negative, but just useful data and “feedback that is actionable”.

    Now, Demand Media’s philosophy is geared more toward making sure the “right people are writing the right content”. This is line with recent partnerships they’ve made and job postings they’ve put out. As previously reported, they have partnership with celebrities like Rachael Ray and Tyra Banks for food and fashion content respectively. We recently looked at a posting calling for qualified business writers.

    The company is also looking at new formats for eHow, they tell us. An example would be an interview-style assignment for a writer, which would bring in some expert content without necessarily having to form a partnership like those with Ray and Banks. Think about an interview with a prominent wedding planner to provide tips on the subject.

    Over time, perhaps we’ll gain more clarity in terms of how effective these new strategies are. We’ve speculated before that Google’s domain-blocking feature may have contributed to recent declines in search visibility. We’d be very interested to know how this works, when sites take drastic measures to improve quality after that.

    Update: On the earnings call, the company announced that eHow has seen a 20% decline in search referral traffic since Panda.

  • Demand Media Search Data Released Ahead of Earnings Call

    Demand Media Search Data Released Ahead of Earnings Call

    Demand Media has its earnings call tomorrow, and many people are no doubt eagerly awaiting what the company has to say. After recently going public, Google rolled out its Panda update in the U.S. which seemed to leave the company in the clear for the most part, but when they launched the update globally and made more tweaks in the U.S. things worked a bit differently.

    Demand Media’s stock has not been doing so great since then. At the time of this writing, it’s currently at $15.75 per share. That’s about $5 less than just after the damage hit.

    Conductor, which has the Searchlight SEO Platform, has released some data about Demand Media’s search visibility (eHow specifically) post-Panda.

    eHow post-panda according to Conductor

    Conductor Senior Research Analyst Nathan Safran says, “We compared search visibility for the 2,000 high-ranking keywords (84% started out pre-Panda above the fold on the SERPs) pre-Panda (Feb. 13th) to this past week (April 27).”

    “When comparing e-how’s search visibility pre-Panda to post Panda nearly three-quarters (72%) of keywords dropped in rank.  Perhaps most tellingly, 42% of keywords dropped from prime visibility positions above the fold (position 4) while 17% dropped entirely off Page 1.”

    It will be very interesting to see what Demand Media has to announce tomorrow. The company has been making moves to improve the quality (and perception) of its flagship content site eHow. Recently they launched a redesign with a new feedback feature that is designed to indicate to the company when certain pieces need more work.

    In addition to that, they’ve been forming partnerships with celebrities to add authoritative voices to certain categories, and are hiring qualified professionals to write on business topics.

  • Google Panda Update Victim HubPages Posts Quality Standards in Recovery Effort

    We’ve covered HubPages a number of times since Google’s Panda update originally launched, as they were one of the victims that lost significant search visibility as a result. Since the update, the site has been making various adjustments to its editorial policy and certain features.

    Interestingly enough, a Googler actually posted a guest post to the HubPages blog before the Panda update rolled out globally, providing tips for HubPages writers to put out better content for AdSense. Since the global roll out, HubPages announced changes like the removal of a “news capsule” feature, and tightening up its policy on affiliate links.

    Now, HubPages has released an overview of its recently added standards. These include:

    • First Capsule Standards:  We no longer allow the use of Amazon, eBay, News, RSS, Comment, or Link capsules as first full-width capsules
    • Word-to-Product Ratios: For every Amazon or eBay product featured in a Hub, there must be at least 50 words of original text
    • Pixelated Images: Pixelated (grainy) images are no longer allowed on Hubs (and keep in mind, watermarked images were never permitted)
    • Affiliate Links: We no longer allow Hubs to link (directly or through redirects) to affiliate or commerce sites which are prohibited under the HubPages rules (e.g. Clickbank and sites that sell eBooks, promote dubious offers, contain a lead capture form, redirect users to unwanted websites, or contain pop-ups, pop-unders, or other features that interfere with sight navigation)
    • Over-Saturated Topics: If you publish a Hub on a topic that is overly saturated on HubPages.com (e.g. MLM, 6 pack abs, forex, acai berry, etc.), your Hub will be held to a higher editorial standard, and you will not be permitted to include links to affiliate offers (though you are still welcome to include links to trustworthy sites such as major news sites or Wikipedia)
    • Duplicated Content: While we used to allow some duplicated content (e.g. if it also existed on your blog and so long as you did not link back to the source), it is now required that all content published on HubPages be unique to the site

    HubPages says it will send emails to authors letting them know which “Hubs” require revision, and they’ll have two weeks to amend them. Otherwise, they’ll be unpublished. However, they can be resubmitted for publication later and will be reviewed again.

    They’ve also added automatic alerts, letting users know when they’re at risk of violating one of their guidelines.

    Earlier this week, we looked at how Demand Media’s eHows is taking content quality more seriously, based on a job posting paying $17-20 per article (up from $10-15) with strict qualifications requiring a degree in business, finance, or law, and “extensive experience in business writing.”

  • eHow Getting Serious About Quality

    eHow Getting Serious About Quality

    Demand Media is getting serious about increasing the quality of eHow content. This has become clear after talks we’ve had with the company, as well as various presentations and interviews they’ve given.

    They also launched a major redesign last month, that came with a feedback feature for users to let the company know whether or not any given article was useful. They’ve been making partnerships with celebrities who are generally considered authorities in their industries, as well as a partnership with Getty Images, to get quality images on content.

    A job opening from eHow Money, posted on PublishersMarketplace.com is further evidence that they’re doing more to attract quality authors. The gig pays $17-20 per article (up from $10-15) and has strict qualifications requiring a degree in business, finance, or law, and “extensive experience in business writing.”

    eHow Money is a channel of the eHow site, and includes sub-categories like “Saving & Spending,” “Real Estate,” “Career,” and “Your Business”. The “Your Business” category is broken down into “Starting a Business,” “Managing Employees,” and “Running a Business”. These categories are broken down even further, and so forth.

    We reported that Demand Media was looking for more business content writers last month, when they tweeted as much, and noted that any expansion in content here is significant, because there’s a good chance people looking to start a business or improve their existing business will be seeing articles from this section a lot, as they search Google for advice on various aspects of business life.

    Granted, that was before the most recent round of the Panda update, where eHow took a significant hint in Google search visibility, based on various data sets from different firms. Still, there are plenty of search queries where eHow is in fact still ranking very well. Currently, for example, for a Google search on “how to evaluate employee performance,” I’m seeing an eHow article rank at the very top.

    It’s good to know that Demand Media is requiring the above qualifications and paying a bit more, as this should (in theory) attract a higher caliber of writing.

    The Panda update didn’t do anything to help Demand’s stock, and the company can downplay the significance of Google traffic to its success all it wants, but losing a large amount of Google traffic isn’t good for any site, particularly one running Google AdSense.

    The more quality content users happen across on eHow, the less likely they’ll be to immediately seek a different search result (Google’s looking at this). Also the less likely they’ll be to block the domain from future searches (Google’s looking at this too). Users might even click the +1 button to send a signal to Google that the articles are in fact high quality, and worthy of top ranking. Maybe.

    Regardless of how eHow continues to perform in search, quality content is also the kind of content that people like to share with others in their social networks. Less dependence on Google for traffic is always a good thing too. Of course if the article is doing well (in terms of shares) on social networks, Google will likely see that and consider it in its rankings too.

  • Google Panda Update Victim HubPages Tweaks Approach to Boost Search Visibility

    HubPages, one of the big victims of Google’s Panda update announced that it is making some changes aimed at getting back in Google’s good graces to bring its content back up to a better level of search visibility.

    “Enhancing readers’ experience on the site will improve our visibility with searchers, and reward those Hubbers who spend the time and energy to publish truly remarkable Hubs,” writes HubPages’ Jason Menayan. “We are about to implement a few more changes to improve the overall experience of our site, aimed at removing content that offers dubious value to the HubPages community of writers and readers.”

    Of course this is not the first time HubPages has addressed content quality for its users. In fact, shortly before this most recent roll-out of Panda (the global/English language one), a Google staffer actually wrote a guest post on the HubPages blog, giving users tips on how to make their content better for AdSense. Then the site got hit by Panda again.

    Now, HubPages is removing its “News Capsule” feature.

    The feature, originally deemed a way to make hubs (HubPages articles) more relevant, has now been determined to add little value to users and the page. Menayan says the links it generated often were only distantly related to the topic.

    The News Capsule from HubPages on Vimeo.

    They’re also tightening up on affiliate links. With the exceptions of Amazon and eBay, they will no longer be allowed in HubPages articles if they point to sites that sell eBooks, promote dubious offers (like watching TV online for free), contain a lead capture form, contain pop-ups, pop-unders or other features that interfere with site navigation, or redirect users to unwanted sites.

    “Redirects themselves are innocuous, but we will be able to track the full path of redirected links, and if any of the redirects pass through or to a prohibited link, then that redirected link will also be prohibited,” says Menayan. “So, if a bit.ly link passes through a clickbank link (a prohibited affiliate link), for example, then that specific bit.ly link on that Hub will be not allowed.”

    In addition, all affiliate links are being disallowed in certain topic areas that are becoming “saturated with low-quality Hubs published by affiliate marketers”.

    This is in reference to topics like acai berries, forex, and six-pack abs, though articles about these topics will still be allowed – just not with affiliate links.

    Finally, HubPages will send out automatic alerts to authors if their hubs don’t comply with the new guidelines.

    Earlier this week, HubPages CEO Paul Edmondson raised an interesting point about the Panda update and its impact on HubPages vs. its impact on Googles’ own YouTube (that would be the opposite impact – YouTube was a clear winner, as were several other video content sites).

    “It appears HubPages has been impacted by this while YouTube has not, despite HubPages having a more strict content policy,” he wrote.

    YouTube itself then dropped an interesting stat in an unrelated blog post of its own, saying only 30% of All YouTube Videos Make Up 99% of Views.

    Another interesting point of note is that eHow (The Demand Media-run content site, which escaped the wrath of the initial U.S. Panda update, but was hit in the most recent version) is the biggest supplier of video to YouTube.

  • Google Panda Update Winners, Losers, and Future Considerations

    So the controversial Google Panda update is now live throughout the world (in the English language). Since Google’s announcement about this, data has come out looking at some of the winners and losers (in terms of search visibility) from both SearchMetrics and Sistrix. Hopefully we can all learn from this experience, as search marketing continues to be critical to online success.

    Has Panda been good to you? Comment here.

    Throughout this article, keep a couple of things in mind. The SearchMetrics and Sistrix data are limited to the UK and Europe. The Panda update has been rolled out globally (in English). It seems fair to assume that while the numbers may not match exactly, there are likely parallel trends in visibility gain or loss in other countries’ versions of Google. So, while the numbers are interesting to look at, they’re not representative of the entire picture – more a general view.

    Also keep in mind that Google has made new adjustments to its algorithm in the U.S. In the announcement, they said the new tweaks would affect 2% of queries (in comparison to 12% for the initial Panda update). Also note that they’re now taking into consideration the domain-blocking feature in “high confidence” situations, as the company describes it. So that may very well have had an impact on some of these sites in the U.S.

    As there were the first time around, the new global version of Panda has brought with it numerous interesting side stories. First, let’s look at some noteworthy sites that were negatively impacted by the update.

    eHow

    eHow managed to escape the U.S. roll-out of the Panda update, and actually come out ahead, but the site’s luck appears to have changed, based on the SearchMetrics/Sistrix data. According to the SearchMetrics data, eHow.co.uk took a 72,30% hit in visibility. eHow.com took a 53,46% hit. Sistrix has eHow.co.uk as its top loser with a -84% change.

    eHow Hit by Panda in the UK

    In the U.S. after looking at some queries we tested before, it does appear that eHow has lost some positioning in some areas – most notably the “level 4 brain cancer” example we’ve often referenced to make a point about Google’s placement of non-authoritative content over more authoritative content for health terms.

    EzineArticles

    EzineArticles, which was heavily impacted the first time around got nailed again, based on the data. SearchMetrics, looking at UK search data has EzineArticles with a drop in search visibility of as much as 93.69%. Sistrix, looking at Europe, has the site as its number 2 loser with a change of -78%.

    This is after an apparently rigorous focus on quality and guidelines following the U.S. update.

    Mahalo

    You may recall that after the U.S. update, Mahalo announced a 10% reduction in staff. “All we can do is put our heads down and continue to make better and better content,” CEO Jason Calacanis told us at the time. “If we do our job I’m certain the algorithm will treat us fairly in the long-term.”

    Since the global roll-out, we’ve seen not indications from Calcanis or Mahalo that more layoffs are happening. “We were impacted starting on February 24th and haven’t seen a significant change up or down since then,” he told us.

    Still, the SearchMetrics UK has Mahalo at a 81.05% decrease in search visibility. The Sistrix data has the site at a -77% change.

    “We support Google’s effort to make better search results and continue to build only expert-driven content,” Calcanis said. “This means any videos and text we make has a credentialed expert with seven years or 10,000 hours of experience (a la Malcolm Gladwell).”

    HubPages

    HubPages was hit the first time, and has been hit again. SearchMetrics has the site at -85,72%. Sistrix has it at -72%.

    An interesting thing about HubPages is that a Googler (from the AdSense department) recently did a guest blog post on the HubPages blog, telling HubPages writers how to improve their content for AdSense.

    Suite101

    Suite101, another one of the biggest losers in the initial update, was even called out by Google as an example of what they were targeting. “I feel pretty confident about the algorithm on Suite 101,” Matt Cutts said in a Wired interview.

    Suite101 CEO Peter Berger followed that up with an open letter to Matt Cutts.

    This time Sixtrix has Suite101 at a -79% change, and SearchMetrics has it at -95,39%. Berger told us this week, “As expected by Google and us, the international impact is noticeably smaller.”

    Xomba

    Xomba.com had a -88,06% change, according to the SearchMetrics data. They also had their AdSense ads temporarily taken away entirely. This doesn’t appear to be related to the update in anyway, but is still a terrible inconvenience that got the company and its users a little bit frantic at a time while their traffic was taking a hit too.

    Google ended up responding and saying they’d have their ads back soon. All the while, Google still links to Xomba on its help page for “How do I use AdSense with my CMS?”

    A lot of price comparison sites were also negatively impacted. In the UK, Ciao.co.uk was a big loser with -93,83% according to SearchMetrics.

    You can see SearchMetrics’ entire list of losers here.

    The Winners

    As there are plenty of losers in this update, somebody has to win right? The big winners appear to be Google, Google’s competitors, news sites, blogs, and video sites. A few porn sites were sprinkled into the list as well.

    All winner data is based on the SearchMetrics data of top 101 winners.

    Google properties positively impacted:

    – youtube.com gained 18.93% in visibility.
    – google.com gained 6.14% in visibility.
    – google.co.uk gained 3.99% visibility.
    – blogspot.com (Blogger) gained gained 22.8% visibility.
    – android.com gained 33.92% in visibility.

    Google competitors positively impacted:

    – yahoo.com increased 9.47%
    – apple.com increased 15.19%
    – facebook.com increased 9.14%
    – dailymotion.com increasd 17.80
    – wordpress.com increased 18.62
    – msn.com increased 8.13%
    – metacafe.com increased 6.45%
    – vimeo.com increased 18.85%
    – flickr.com increased 12.39%
    – typepad.com increased 43.86%
    – tripadvisor.co.uk increased 7.81%
    – mozilla.org increased 19.44%
    – windowslive.co.uk increased 29.46%
    – live.com increased 6.62%

    News sites, blogs, and video sites positively impacted include (but are not limited to):

    – youtube.com – 18.93% visibility increase
    – telegraph.co.uk 16.98% visibility increase
    – guardian.co.uk – 9.73% visibility increase
    – bbc.co.uk – 5.46% visibility increase
    – yahoo.com – 9.47% visibility increase
    – blogspot.com (Blogger) – 22.8% visibility increase
    – dailymail.co.uk – 12.72% visibility increase
    – dailymotion – 17.8% visibility increase
    – ft.com – 16.17% visibility increase
    – independent.co.uk – 21.53% visbility increase
    – readwriteweb.com – 152.46% visbility increase
    – thegregister.co.uk – 13.47% visibility increase
    – itv.com – 22.38% visibility increase
    – cnet.com – 14.21% visibility increase
    – mirror.co.uk – 24.87% visibility increase
    – mashable.com – 22.61% visibility increase
    – wordpress.com – 18.62% visibility increase
    – techcrunch.com – 40.72% visibility increase
    – time.com – 55.24% visibility increase
    – metacafe.com – 6.45% visibility increase
    – reuters.com – 36.82% visibility increase
    – thenextweb.com – 3.85% visibility increase
    – zdnet.co.uk – 34.04% visibility increase
    – vimeo.com – 18.85% visibility increase
    – typepad.com – 43.86% visibility increase

    Bounce Rate Significance?

    SearchMetrics sees a pattern in the winners, in that time spent on site is a major factor. “Compare the winners against the losers,” SearchMetrics CTO and Co-Founder Marcus Tober tells WebProNews. “It seems that all the loser sites are sites with a high bouce rate and a less time on site ratio. Price comparison sites are nothing more than a search engine for products. If you click on a product you ‘bounce’ to the merchant. So if you come from Google to ciao.co.uk listing page, than you click on an interesting product with a good price and you leave the page. On Voucher sites it is the same. And on content farms like ehow you read the article and mostly bounce back to Google or you click Adsense.”

    “And on the winners are more trusted sources where users browse and look for more information,” he continues. “Where the time on site is high and the page impressions per visit are also high. Google’s ambition is to give the user the best search experience. That’s why they prefer pages with high trust, good content and sites that showed in the past that users liked them.”

    “This conclusion is the correlation of an analysis of many Google updates from the last 6 months,” he adds. “Also the Panda US and UK updates.”

    The Future

    It doesn’t look like Panda is slowing down search marketing ambition:

    Even Post Panda Search Marketing To Reach $19.3 Billion In ’11, Mobile On Rise http://bit.ly/e5PsgH #Mediapost 2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

    Well, SEO isn’t getting any easier, so that makes sense. Beyond the Panda update, it’s not like Google is going to slow down in its algorithm tweaks. As webmasters and publishers get used to the latest changes, more continue to pour out.

    In an AFP interview, Google’s Scott Huffman says his team tested “many more than” 6,000 changes to the search engine in 2010 alone. 500 of them, he said, went on to become permanent changes. What are the odds that number will be lower in 2011?

    Huffman also told the AFP that plenty of improvements are ahead, including those related to understanding inferences from different languages.

    And let’s not forget the Google +1 button, recently announced. Google said flat out that the information would go on to be used as a ranking signal. Google specifically said it will “start to look at +1s as one of the many signals we use to determine a page’s relevance and ranking, including social signals from other services. For +1s, as with any new ranking signal, we’ll be starting carefully and learning how those signals affect search quality over time.”

    Make friends with Google’s webmaster guidelines.

    Have you been impacted by the global roll-out of Panda? For better or worse? Let us know in the comments.

  • Google Does Guest Post for Panda Victim HubPages

    Google Does Guest Post for Panda Victim HubPages

    HubPages was one of the big Panda victims from based on the often-cited Sistrix report. The company never denied this.

    “We are confident that over time the proven quality of our writers’ content will be attractive to users,” HubPages CEO Paul Edmondson told us soon after the Panda update was first launched in the U.S. “We have faith in Google’s ability to tune results post major updates and are optimistic that the cream will rise back to the top in the coming weeks, which has been our experience with past updates.”

    With that, it’s interesting that Google has taken to the HubPages blog to tell HubPage writers how to make better content for AdSense.

    Specifically, Thomas Tran, a Googler since 2008, who works “mainly in AdSense newbies education,” talked about “how to drive quality traffic” to “hubs” (HubPages articles), so they can increase their AdSense ads click-through-rates and earn more money.

    Google has been talking about more open communication with webmasters, but it’s interesting that they’re going so far as to write guest posts on publishers’ blogs aimed at helping writers have more success. I wonder if they’ll write for eHow, Suite101, or other sites that churn out content for AdSense dollars.

    Tran’s four basic tips to writers are:

    1. Write authentic, non-scripted, easy-to-read and structured content.

    2. Get inspiration from Google AdWords Keyword tool and the Top Search Queries from the Google Webmaster Tools.

    3. Use unique and accurate titles.

    4. Promote your hubs internally and externally.

    He elaborates on each of these points in the post.

    Based on Compete’s data, it looks like HubPages was on a steady increase in traffic from month-to-month, until February, when Panda hit. Edmondson told us some content went up, and some went down. When asked if articles are written specifically for search, he said, “It’s up to our writers. We let them choose what they wish to write within our editorial policies. We offer tools and education for our users to become better online writers – this includes – among a vast array of things – best practices for search.”

    “SEO has to be an important part of any publisher’s traffic sources,” he added. “We make SEO tools available to our writers, its up to them whether they want to use it or not. We are very sensitive around not abusing search engine practices and will take down articles that are obviously trying to game the system.” More on our conversation with Edmondson and with a HubPages writer here.

    HubPages then posted a message to users, regarding the update, conveying a continued quest to boost quality:

    As we continue to adjust our way through the most recent Google algorithm changes, we are actively reviewing how we can improve the HubPages experience and make adjustments to improve the site and experience. As mentioned in previous posts, we have already made some changes, primarily focused at weeding out lower quality content that adds little to no value to the site and community and to optimize the advertising layouts. In the upcoming weeks, I expect to announce further changes we will implement aimed at improving sitewide experience and quality of Hubs. We have various methods for measuring “quality” including HubScore, community ratings and feedback, link quality, etc.

    I appreciate everyone’s patience as we devise and implement our next course of action. The most important effect of the next wave of changes will be to our writers who will benefit from a rise in the overall quality of content published on HubPages and the removal of lower quality content that tends to decrease traffic and visitors’ experience to the site. I see a lot of great discussions in the forums and am encouraged to see so many active members of the community that are just as concerned and motivated to improve the site as we are.

    More on ranking in Google now that the Panda update has gone global.

  • EzineArticles Tells Authors How to Get Accepted Post Panda

    If you’ve been keeping up with the fallout from Google’s Panda algorithm update, you’ll know that EzineArticles has been reported to have been one of the hardest hit sites. Last week, CEO Christohper Knight gave an update about the site’s traffic.

    He said, they lost between ten and thirty-five percent of their traffic, but Google has yet to roll out the update internationally, and that could mean more bad news for the sites that have already seen their traffic slides since the U.S. update.

    EzineArticles CEO Chris Knight Gives Update on Traffic After Google Panda Algorithm Update

    Shortly after the update, EzineArticles quickly set out some new quality guidelines and site tweaks aimed at getting its content back in Google’s good graces. Now they’re giving users tips to help them “create high quality articles that will have a much better chance of being approved”.

    EzineArticles’ Director of Online Education runs them down on the company blog. They include:

    – Matching author names between the byline and the author in the resource box.

    – Limiting links to a maximum of 4 (2 self-serving and 2 non-self-serving). Keeping the self-serving ones in the resource box is recommended.

    – Content delivering on the article title

    – Limiting referenced material, with the majority being original content. I wonder how many will simply choose to forego credit where it’s due.

    – Properly formatting articles with now grammatical errors and “plenty of white space”

    – Limiting resource box to 15% of the total number of words in the article.

    – Limiting use of any one keyword to no more than 2% of the total amount of words in the article.

    EzineArticles is also encouraging authors to pay close attention to their writing analytics, which include article stats like total views, URL clicks, clickthrough rates, EzinePublisher (which indicates the number of times an article has been picked up by an ezine publisher), number of times article has been emailed, comments, and votes/ratings.

    It will be interesting to watch EzineArticles’ traffic patterns in light of the continued focus on quality improvement.

  • Quora vs. eHow: Where’s the Better Quality?

    Quora vs. eHow: Where’s the Better Quality?

    Ok, the title is a trick question. There’s no concrete answer to this. You’ll find a mix of quality across both Quora and eHow. Furthermore, these sites are two different animals, but there is some overlap. Both sites have more than just how-to content, but both sites also have a great deal of how-to content.

    Have you had a better experience with content on Quora or on eHow? Let us know.

    It is this realization that led me to this piece to begin with. Browsing Quora, looking for some interesting conversations, I came across this one for, “How should you wash clothes?” Yes, that’s Quora, not eHow. The thread has actually been open since June of last year.

    Quora gets a lot of press for content about companies – people with direct knowledge of situations answering questions about said situations. Apparently it’s also a how-to site. Do a Quora search for “how to” and you will be inundated with search results. Among those, you’ll find some of the kinds of content Quora is more well-known for, but you’ll also find things like “How can I learn to love salads?”, “How do you learn to love yourself?”, “How is sunscreen thought to cause cancer?”, etc.

    Quora How To Results better than eHow?

    We’ve called out Google in the past for ranking apparently non-authoritative content from eHow for cancer related queries, so it seems only fair to address that last Quora example as well. Quora is not ranking high in Google’s results for that, and I have to wonder whether or not it was before the Panda update. That would be interesting to know.

    The top answer itself comes from someone who is following medical and cancer topics on Quora, but her bio does not appear to be present. It would be helpful for these types of answers to know something about the person who is answering. Is this person a doctor, for example? We don’t know. We just know that other Quora users (including co-founder Charlie Cheever in this case) liked the answer enough to vote it up. I wonder if Quora might be more useful with required bios. Of course, then the whole online anonymity debate comes into play.

    One interesting thing about Quora is that it had a feedback system built-in from the get go – something eHow has just implemented with its new redesign.

    eHow Helpful button - curation layer

    Quora answers are voted up or down by users, and there are links for “thank” and “not helpful”.

    Someone posted the question on Quora, “Is Quora trying to copy eHow?” but it has not been answered at this point. Seems like a good place for Quora’s founders to jump in.

    Your Quora experience is what you make of it. You choose the people and topics to follow, so if you’re a user, you can keep it at least somewhat relevant to your needs. We talked before about how Quora’s experience is about the content more than it is about the service itself. A lot of high profile people have had plenty of interesting things to say on Quora. The same could be said for Twitter and other services.

    In fact, the same can actually even be said for eHow, as it continues to make more partnerships to bring authoritative (or at least celebrity) voices to its content. It’s a different format, but again, there is some overlap.

    I find it interesting that Quora users seem to be churning out more and more of the kind of content that usually gets associated with content farms and alleged content farms – “how-to” stuff in particular.

    In some ways, one might even consider Quora a direct competitor to a site like eHow, but Quora isn’t dominating the search results the way eHow does. Of course, Quora’s model is not to create content based on what people are searching for. Quora starts with questions, and people answer those questions (some likely hoping to be found in search results as a result – not to get traffic per se, but at least to be viewed as an authority on a given subject).

    As far as who has the better quality, it depends on the topic, and it depends on your opinion. Google is certainly holding eHow in higher regard for the examples I’ve seen. Searching for “How should you wash clothes?” I see wikiHow ranking at the top, followed by eHow, and this is the exact title of the Quora piece, mind you (it’s not for wikiHow or eHow). The Quora result doesn’t even appear in the first ten pages.

    Should Quora results appear more for Google searches? Less? Tell us what you think.

  • Decreasing Google Dependence: A Growing Trend

    John Citrone, editor at the online writing community Xomba.com, says Xomba saw Google’s Panda update coming, and started preparing last summer, when it started to draw up a plan to prepare for an “algorithmic shift” from Google.

    “Around the first of the year, we began creating a new site design with new community networking features for people who want to express themselves in more than 140 characters,” he tells WebProNews. “Our new design will reduce or eliminate our dependence on Google to bring us traffic through its search results; our focus is to build a community of people who want to network with each other and share their experiences and their passions.”

    “Xomba’s approach to revenue sharing is similar that of HubPages and the like, but we will no longer emphasize that aspect of writing at Xomba,” he says referring to one of the sites that got hit hard by the Google Panda update. “We are, instead, changing the way people approach writing online.”

    “We were lucky, considering the broad-reaching impact the Google changes have meant for sites like ours,” Citrone tells us. “We have been preparing for this for quite a while, so though we may have experienced an immediate hit, we are confident that our site relaunch will not only put us where we were pre-algorithmic shift, but will also mean more independence for us in the future.”

    “In the past, Google was our primary source of traffic, but last summer we decided to make changes that would offer us more flexibility and independence,” he continues. “We knew this would be important if we wanted to remain viable in the long-term.”

    “Since we are moving toward building a community of users, we will capitalize on integrating with existing social networks like Facebook and Twitter,” he adds. “We have created a host of networking features within the site as well, to offer our users greater command over where their content is posted and how it is being viewed. We’re more interested in building a community similar to Twitter or Tumblr than competing with ‘low-quality content farms.’”

    While most content sites rely on Google or search in general for the bulk of their traffic, Xomba’s approach reflects a newer way of thinking throughout the web – that less dependence on search (and being less at the mercy of algorithms) is a better approach for a sustainable business. In other words, it’s best not to put your eggs all in one basket.

    Sites are likely to find their best traffic sources to come from the channels in which they put the most effort into. If SEO is your game – and you really take it seriously – you probably get most of your traffic from search. If you ignore SEO, but spend endless hours improving your social strategy, you probably get more from social channels. Of course a good mix is ideal, but the point is, there are potential traffic sources besides Google.

    That said, Google is an incredible force on the web with its huge share of the search market. It’s hard to trump Google visibility, but people are spending a great deal of time these days using social channels, and compelling content is what people are sharing.

    “Last summer, we decided to push our users toward posting substantive content and promoting it through networking features,” says Citrone. “We even went so far as to change our posting rules to raise the ‘quality’ bar. We want users to post content they care about. Our position is that content that is well-put-together, content people inject with their own passion, will find an audience. It’s also something they can be proud of and promote independently, without relying solely on Google.”

    “All user-generated content sites could be considered content farms,” he says. “But let’s be clear: We don’t employ writers nor do we instruct our users on what to write about. The term ‘content farm’ has taken on a stigma that is unbecoming, and it certainly is not what we are about. We want people coming to Xomba because the content is strong, entertaining and substantive. If it hits high in search engines, great. If not, it’s still worthwhile. That’s what matters to us.”

    Sites most commonly lumped into the content farm category (the actual definition of the phrase is widely debated) are also going out of their way to improve quality. Demand Media, which is often the first company associated with this label in the public eye (though the company itself will have no part of it) has been particularly vocal about improving its quality – even long before the Panda update – and even long before its recent IPO.

    The fact of the matter is that most sites with large amounts of content have a wide spectrum of quality. Demand Media’s properties are included in that. Demand has been making high-profiles deals with brands and celebrities to enhance the quality and perception of the content it offers. The company has also put an increasing amount of focus on social media – less dependence on Google.

    Demand Media is looking at implementing some kind of “curation layer” to its content, which the company has said will be a way of “using (something like) Facebook” as a way to give feedback on how helpful articles are. They would then use that feedback to improve the quality of content.

    HubPages has taken steps to improve its own site search – a good way to keep visitors from going right back to Google to continue searching for what they’re looking for.

    “We foresaw the Google changes and have been working hard preparing for them over the last year,” Citrone tells us. “This seems to have kept us in front of the curve. Specifically, over the last couple of months we’ve informed our users that we’re raising the standards for acceptable content.”

    “The new website is being built with a philosophy similar to websites like Twitter, but for people who want to write more than 140 characters,” he says. “There’s a high demand for this kind of community, especially now with the fall of ‘low-quality’ ‘content farms.’ Our success should not be determined by changes in any search engine algorithm, but by the acceptance and enthusiasm of our audience.”

    Xomba Redesigns Site, Hopes to Reduce Dependence on Google For Traffic
    Xomba is in its final design stages and is ready to launch its new design strategy next month. While we have yet to see how effective Xomba’s redesign will be itself, the philosophy behind it is dead on. Create a great user experience that makes people want to use your site. The best traffic is direct. That’s the traffic that sticks around for a while and comes back after it’s gone. Never stop looking for ways to improve the user interface of your own site.

    As far as referral traffic, Google should not be ignored, but there is also a growing number of potential new sources as more ways to share become available – new social channels, new mobile apps, etc.

  • Google Panda Update: Lack of Consistency on Quality?

    We’ve been talking with a lot of people who have had their sites impacted negatively by Google’s recent “Panda” algorithm update. Our thinking is that the more sides of the story we hear, the more webmasters and content producers will be able to learn from it. With that, we had a conversation with Paul Edmondson, CEO of HubPages, which made the list of the hardest-hit sites.

    Have you gained additional insight into the Panda Update as time has progressed? Share in the comments.

    HubPages, which launched in 2006 as a social content community for writers to write “magazine-like articles”,  pays 60% from the ad impressions to the writers. You may find how-to articles, not unlike those you would find at eHow, but also in a variety of other styles. Authors on HubPages publish nearly 3,000 “Hubs” a day, over 7,000 comments and thousands of questions and answers and forum posts, according to Edmondson. Last year, there were over 13,000 total incremental pieces of content a day, he said.

    When directly asked if HubPages is a content farm, Edmondson told us, “Actually, HubPages is to articles what YouTube is to video. Like YouTube where enthusiasts post videos of their choice, our community write articles about whatever they wish and are passionate about. This covers a wide range of content from poetry to recipes, and pretty much everything in between. Writers choose what they write about, and they own their content.  In return, they stand behind the content, build readership and interact within the HubPages community.”

    Paul Edmondson of HubPages Talks QualityOn where HubPages stands out compared to sites from Demand Media, Associated Content, and others, Edmondson said, “First, we think authors rule! We align our interests with our authors – and this is key to our long-term success. At HubPages, authors choose what they write about and they own the content they write.  We also share impressions with the author for as long as the content is published on HubPages.  Our incentives are aligned with the authors’ needs. At its core, HubPages is a passionate community of writers. The value that is created goes well beyond the revenue opportunity,” he said. “To have a truly healthy ecosystem, writers need social interaction, feedback and praise.  To this end, HubPages has offered the ability to fan authors – which turned out to be commonly known as ‘follow’ in 2006.  Some authors have thousands of followers for everything they publish.  We also developed an accolade system to give back positive feedback and encouragement.  When these items are combined, HubPages is revealed to be a very unique collection of people, with authentic voices, sharing their knowledge with the world.”

    When asked how frequently HubPages articles rank among the top results for searches in Google,   Edmondson said,  “Some of our content ranks very high, and some isn’t in the index at all. We don’t have the data to answer this question for every piece of content and the potential search terms that a Hub could rank for in the search results.”

    When asked if articles are written specifically for search, he said, “It’s up to our writers. We let them choose what they wish to write within our editorial policies. We offer tools and education for our users to become better online writers – this includes – among a vast array of things – best practices for search.”

    “SEO has to be an important part of any publisher’s traffic sources,” he said. “We make SEO tools available to our writers, its up to them whether they want to use it or not. We are very sensitive around not abusing search engine practices and will take down articles that are obviously trying to game the system.”

    We had a separate conversation with a HubPages writer, who for this article will just go by the name Chuck. He is a college economics instructor. Chuck tells us,  “HubPages is a very good site for earning money.  This has been both my experience as well as that of other writers on the site who have published Hubs on their earnings experience.”

    Chuck says the freedom to write on whatever topics a writer wants to write about is one of the main things that makes HubPage attractive. “This not only allows writers, including me, to focus on topics that interest or excite us but also gives us freedom to explore new areas of writing.  I find that this freedom offers me an opportunity to challenge myself as well as the opportunity to broaden the range of my writing.  It also lets me test the money making potential of other areas outside my immediate area of interest and expertise.”

    Chuck says the HubPages team is constantly updating the site by regularly giving writers new tools to work with. “These changes and updates also include continual updating of the look and feel of the site which keeps it fresh and new-looking for visitors,” he says. “HubPages has an excellent training area on the site which enables both new and existing users to learn how to use the various tools as well as allowing all of us to keep our skills current in other business aspects of the site.”

    “The Professionalism and quality of the site attracts good writers which in turn attracts increasing numbers of viewers which benefits all of us,” he continues. “The HubPages team puts a strong emphasis on marketing which not only continually brings in new viewers and writers, but also enables the team to keep writers informed about current reading tastes and habits of visitors.”

    “HubPages is also a good social networking site,” he adds. “ It offers the opportunity to meet and interact with others from around the world both through exchanges on Hubs as well as in the Forums.  In addition to learning from the writings of others and comments left on my Hubs and those of others that I read, I have met and been in direct contact with a few people both Hubbers and visitors which have resulted in some mutually beneficial exchanges of information.  These exchanges have included my receiving some photographs from fellow Hubber Ralph Deeds which I was able to use on 2 of my Hubs.  On my Hub about Mathew Juan I was contacted by a visitor who not only provided me with additional information for my research but I was also able to provide him with some information which he used to update his website.  I received a nice email from a local artist whose work I wrote about on my Hub about Public Art who requested permission to use my photos in his advertising.  I have had other, similar exchanges, on of which I am still following up on and which might lead to some paid writing assignments.”

    Chuck says he’s never written for Demand Media, Associated Content, or Suite101 (all of which have seen some impact from the Panda update – some more than others). “However, I have done some writing for TheInfomine.com, MyGeoInfo.com, Xomba.com and SheToldMe.com,” Chuck says. “ Most of my writing on all of these have consisted of articles related to Hubs I have written (but not copies) with links back to my related Hub article. I have collected a few dollars in Google Adsense money from these but am reconsidering keeping my AdSense code on them as I believe it was Jimmy The Jock in his piece on Success Stories who said that he found he made more Adsense earnings by not having ads on outside sites as more of the readers then tended to go to his Hubs rather than wandering off to an ad on the other site.  His experience showed him that bringing the people to HubPages generated more ad clicks.”

    Last week, HubPages launched a new ad platform. “Changing the long-held equation between advertisers and individual online writers, HubPages is launching its HubPages Ad Program that will give its writers access to the premium ad rates that so far have been restricted to giant publishers,” Edmondson said.  “This offering is the first time that any online writer will be able to access significant advertising revenues, as available via premium advertising networks and direct sales, while retaining all rights to their own content.Individual writers have always been considered too small to be worth advertiser attention and the agency model wasn’t built to work with millions of content producers. While the democratization of content has occurred, the earning power has not been available until now.  HubPages is leveraging its size and scale as a top 50 site (Quantcast) to negotiate better ad money on behalf of our writers.”

    Edmondson addressed the Panda update on the HubPages blog recently, saying that they hadn’t seen it consistently drive traffic to better-quality Hubs. “On one hand, some of our best content has seen a drop in traffic; simultaneously, we have seen traffic rise on Hubs that are just as great,” he wrote. “We are taking this seriously — behind the scenes, we have been crunching data and focusing on making sure that we are doing everything right from our side. We have an editorial policy and internal system that rewards original useful content, and this aligns with what Google wants, too.”

    “We have several internal quality metrics that make up HubScore and we have deeply analyzed things like content length, view duration, Hub Hopper ratings, and HubScore,’ he added. “These elements have been compared to changes in Google referrals, and again, based on the way we rate content quality, the fluctuation so far looks random at this stage of the update. We believe that a change of this size will take a settling-in period. We have reached out to Google and will continue to study the update.”

    Like any other site that has user-generated content or a massive amount of articles, it stands to reason that there is a mix of both good and bad quality content on HubPages – not unlike YouTube. It’s how Google ranks the content in search results that ultimately matters to users of the search engine, which at this time accounts for the majority of Internet users. HubPages’ quality metrics are probably not identical to Google’s quality metrics, but it’s interesting that Endmondson thinks some of the site’s best content was negatively impacted. My guess is that HubPages is not alone in this.

    We’ve still seen examples in the wild, where Google continues to rank less authoritative content over more authoritative results. We’ve referred to the “level 4 brain cancer” example several times, which continues to show an eHow article as the top result over actual experts in the brain cancer field. In fact, one of our own articles is even showing up on the first page now (presumably from having referenced it a few times). While we’re flattered that Google would consider us enough of an authority on the subject, I think users would still prefer to see more useful advice from a medical standpoint.

    Another interesting side story to this whole Google search quality thing is that Google has a patent application out for essentially what Demand Media does – suggesting topics for people to write about based on search. Are we going to see Knol results “filling in the gaps”? More on that here.

    Many of the sites hit hardest by the Panda update are trying to find ways to become less dependent on Google. It’s wise not to be too dependent on any one traffic source anyway, but the Panda update has really driven this point home. HubPages has taken some time to improve its own internal search. As Mike Moran said in a recent article, this is a good way to keep from driving your visitors back to Google to find what they’re looking for.

    For additional insight:  Google “Panda” Algorithm Update – What’s Known & What’s Possible

    Thoughts on Google’s search quality post-Panda? Share in the comments.

  • Demand Media Redesigns eHow with Quality Control Feature

    Demand Media has launched a redesign of eHow.com. The company says it’s putting more focus on better quality content.

    A Demand Media representative tells WebPoNews, “With the site overhaul, eHow.com is growing to be more than just a ‘how-to’ site to a place which provides much more educational content including new feature-length articles produced by in-house studio writers as well as new high-definition video series.”

    eHow Redesign from Demand Media

    eHow Redesign from Demand Media

    I probably don’t have to tell you that there is a fair amount of controversy surrounding the eHow brand, particularly among enthusiasts of the search world. eHow often dominates Google’s search results for a vast range of queries. It is often labeled a “content farm,” and many expected it to get hit hard by Google’s Panda (some call it “Farmer”) algorithm update. eHow, however, was not hit hard by the update, and actually gained while a plethora of other sites saw their rankings and traffic plunge.

    Still, Demand Media has stressed recently that it is not completely reliant on Google for traffic, and is putting more and more focus on social media to decrease said dependence even more. It probably helps that Demand Media continues to expand its offerings in social media in general. Much of the media attention DM gets is on its content side of things, but it also has a social platform (which it is currently expanding more into Facebook itself via a partnership with Buddy Media), a variety of branded social apps, etc. among other things.

    Social is a big part of the eHow redesign too. For one, the new design features Facebook’s new comments system, which should instantly insert more eHow visibility into users’ Facebook news feeds.

    eHow Redesign From Demand Media Comes with Facebook Comments system
    “eHow.com has evolved into an indispensable resource that millions of people rely on,” said Gregory Boudewijn, general manager at eHow. “People know and trust the eHow brand and we felt a responsibility to evolve the consumer experience. The new design is focused on making it easier for visitors to find the solutions they seek. At the same time, we created unique destination channels for the categories where our audience is most passionate and we’ll continue to deliver new features and quality content for these audiences.”

    The new eHow has six primary content channels: Home, Money, Style, Health, Family, and Food. Everything else falls into “more”.

    eHow's New Content Categories
    Also added, is that “curation layer” that the company has referred to several times recently. This is an important part, as it is one of the ways Demand Media will work to improve and maintain quality of content. It (at least in part) comes in the form of a “Helpful?” button that users can use to provide feedback.  The button remains at the side of the article as the reader scrolls, so it is always visible on the page. It offers simple yes/no options.

    If you click yes, it brings up a box with a message like, “Thanks for helping us to make eHow better for everyone,” and includes a Facebook “like” button.  If you click no, it asks, “Why not?” and gives options that the user can check, including:

    – Too general/no useful information
    – Information is out of date
    – Information is inaccurate
    – Article needs more photos
    – Article is offensive
    – Wasn’t what I was looking for

    The feedback from these buttons, which appear on every article and video, are funneled directly to the editorial team, so they can monitor and improve the content. They will look at content that gets negative feedback, and determine whether it’s worth improving, or just getting rid of entirely.

    Along with the redesign, eHow is debuting a new hi-def video series called Curbside Eats today for its Food category. Demand Media also launched its Tyra Banks-branded Type F site the other night, and the company says it will continue to look for similar celebrity partnerships to bring authoritative brands to its content.

  • Will Google Fill In Its Own Search Gaps, Demand Media-Style?

    Last year, a Google patent application was released for “Identifying inadequate search content“.  This is described as, “systems and methods for identifying inadequate search content are provided. Inadequate search content, for example, can be identified based on statistics associated with the search queries related to the content.”

    Bill Slawski, who frequently writes about Google patents, discussed this last summer, talking about how Google might suggest topics for users to write about. It sounds a little like Demand Media’s model doesn’t it?

    Patrick Altoft gets credit for bringing this back into the conversation, in light of Google’s Panda update, which came down hard on some sites often referred to as content farms (though not so much on Demand Media’s eHow, interestingly enough). He suggests some ways that Google could go about implementing such a system, including: selling story ideas to publishers, working with partners to get them to write content, giving the data away in their keyword research tool, creating an aggregation system similar to how reviews are pulled into Google Places,  or adding wiki style user contributions sections to search results.

    Google has historically not been in the business of creating content, and I wouldn’t expect them to go that route now. The wiki idea is interesting. Wikis seem to have done pretty well against the Panda update. wikiHow was one of the top winners according to some reports.

    Google does have the wiki-like Knol, which is still in beta. What if Google started promoting it more aggressively, and integrated the system described in this patent to help push it beyond beta status?

    Alternative search engine DuckDuckGo has a feature called the zero-click result, which is similar to some of the instant answer-type results Google gives. DDG recently added wikiHow to the list of sites whose content is displayed in this type of result. What if Google followed suit, but with its own wiki-style results based on topics it suggested itself? Who knows where Google’s gaps are better than Google?

    Here’s an interesting quote from Google’s Udi Manber, all the way back in 2007: “A knol on a particular topic is meant to be the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read. The goal is for knols to cover all topics, from scientific concepts, to medical information, from geographical and historical, to entertainment, from product information, to how-to-fix-it instructions. ” (emphasis added)

    Manber added, “Google will not serve as an editor in any way, and will not bless any content. All editorial responsibilities and control will rest with the authors. We hope that knols will include the opinions and points of view of the authors who will put their reputation on the line. Anyone will be free to write. For many topics, there will likely be competing knols on the same subject. Competition of ideas is a good thing.”

    Currently, anyone can try to edit a knol post, and the changes are sent as suggestions to the post’s author. They can then either be accepted or rejected. It’s a bit different than the traditional wiki, but there are some pretty obvious similarities.

    In some people’s eyes, there’s a pretty fine line between wikis and content farms. We’ve spoken with wikiHow founder Jack Herrick (who also ran eHow before selling to Demand Media) about the quality differences between the two types of sites. His analysis is worth reading if you’re interested in that.

    If Google implemented such a system, it would no doubt be the target of a great deal of criticism, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they wouldn’t do it.

    Who knows what Google’s actual plans are with this patent? Either way,  it’s an interesting topic of discussion. Perhaps the real question is what SHOULD Google do with this? A gap in quality search results is a gap. It’s hard to say that content from a content farm isn’t better than no relevant content whatsoever. How would you like to see the gaps filled?

  • Suite101 CEO Writes Open Letter to Google’s Matt Cutts

    Google basically called out Suite101 as the poster child site of what its “Panda” algorithm update was aimed at. Reports have found the site to be one of the hardest hit, and while the site has often been mentioned in the same breath as sites like eHow in the past, eHow has apparently gained from the update.

    When asked about it in a recent Wired interview, Google’s Matt Cutts said, “I feel pretty confident about the algorithm on Suite 101.”

    We had reached out to Suite101 prior to the publication of that article, but only since it was published, have we heard back. A representative for Suite101 pointed us to an open letter to Matt Cutt from CEO Peter Berger, in response to the comments from the Wired piece. Here is a sample of the letter (read the whole thing in its entirety here):

    Peter Berger, CEO of Suitie 101 Talks about SEO , Quality, and the long tailWe have certainly noticed that within the last week Google has stopped sending our content as many readers as it had in the past, resulting in a decline of 30% in overall traffic. We have been working to understand what separates successful content on our site from negatively impacted content, and have also tried to compare how other sites on the web rank for given Google queries.

    We do not get the sense that this “Panda” algorithm update is about filtering out “low quality” content. We do appreciate that Google is constantly trying to improve immediate user relevance for given search queries. That means that Google has to experiment with evaluating measurable properties of content in alternative ways. Engineers might refer to these properties or signals as “quality” (within the context of a given search query), but please do understand that when a representative of Google describes entire sites as “low quality” outside of engineering circles, this can be perceived as insulting by people who associate “quality” rather with an individual piece’s execution, angle and craft, and who have taken great pride in creating it.

    We take it that concise, high quality writing is a signal that Google de-emphasized with its algorithm update. That is a legitimate business decision, even if some of the content we currently publish does not benefit from it. Other factors have become more important, and we will try to understand them, and work to help those of our writers who feel that Google is the best distribution channel for their thoughts to improve their articles.

    For the sake of the web as the rich ecosystem it is, we hope that Google stays committed to:

    * a page-by-page evaluation of the web’s content, emphasizing its actual “content” over its display and polish

    * respect of copyright, diligently ensuring original content is not outranked by scraped content

    * impartiality in terms of content’s ownership, including treating publicly listed corporations’ as well as Google’s own content not differently from the rest of the web

    Another level of depth may be added to this discussion if the word “quality” were more fully defined. “Quality” without much more precisely defining it, especially when the quality mentioned does only seem to be a quality signal relating to a given search query, leaves a lot still misunderstood…

    We spoke with Berger last year, long before this update was realized, but during a time when search quality was really starting to come into question as content farm sites were really on the rise.

    Berger told us, “Every week, several thousand people apply to become Suite101 writers. While we only accept a portion of applicants based on our non-negotiable quality standards, we do have many successful writers on our site who do not consider themselves ‘writers.”
    “We see it as Suite101′s mission to enable people – anyone who can write well and with deep understanding of a subject – to achieve their goals,” he said. “These might be earning money, addressing large audiences, building up a personal professional brand, or simply enjoying creative freedom in a nurturing, peer-oriented environment.”

    Cutts has yet to respond to the letter, at least in the comments section, but it hasn’t been live very long, and Cutts is keeping pretty busy from the sound of things.

  • Retrevo Says Google Update Pushed Bigger Brands Up

    Consumer electronics shopping site Retrevo was among those sites hurt by Google’s recent algorithm update. The company tells us that bigger brands are now favored over their content for searches where they were ranking well before.

    Co-founder and VP of Marketing Manish Rathi tells WebProNews, "We saw ranking for us go up for some pages and go down for some pages on Google. The net effect has been marginally negative – single digit in percentage terms and with negligible business impact. In our assessment, the marginal drop in ranking for some pages is attributed to bigger brands (CNET, Amazon and CE brands) gaining over us where we used to be ahead of them."

    Manish Rathi of Retrevo Talks Impact of Google Update"We have built a brand around consumer technology that is trusted by more than 6 million users every month," says Rathi. "Retrevo’s value map, real-time review, user manuals and accessory compatibility is a novel way to help consumers navigate the ever-confusing technology shopping space." 

    "Search engines continue to make tweaks to improve the user experience for the right reason and we believe as Retrevo’s brand becomes stronger over time, we will get our fair share of the recognition against bigger brands such as CNET and Amazon," Rathi adds. "At the end of the day, we live and die by the belief that if you do the right thing for your customers, you will be a winner."

    Retrevo often publishes studies about consumer electronics, looking at things like tablet purchases, mobile shopping habits, connected TV operating systems, etc. 

    According to Crunchbase, it is now one of the largest consumer electronics shopping and review sites online. Main competitors are listed as PC World and CNET Reviews.

    For more from our series on casualties from the recent Google algorithm update, see the following articles:

    Google Algorithm Update Casualties Speak
    Google Algorithm Update to Get "New Layer" to Help "Falsely Caught" Sites
    EzineArticles Aims to Get Rankings Back, Following Google Algorithm Update
    Google Update Costs Mahalo Employees Their Jobs
    Calacanis on Google Algorithm Aftermath and Impact on Mahalo
    Google Algorithm Update Helps (Not Hurts) eHow
    Did Google’s Algorithm Update Go Far Enough on Content Farms?
    Demand Media Responds to Google Content Farm Update
    Google Finally Cracks Down on Content Farms

  • AdSense and Its Relationship to Search Rankings

    AdSense and Its Relationship to Search Rankings

    Many of the lower quality sites Google targeted with its algorithm update rely on Google AdSense ads for revenue. Many low quality sites have been created over the years just to make AdSense money. Obviously Google knows this, but when some of the big sites often labeled as content farms churn out mass content, there is potentially a lot of money to be made for both that content site and for Google. So a question like, "Does your advertising spending with Google influence your position in Google’s natural search?" isn’t exactly unheard of.

    In a recent Google Blog post, Matt Cutts wrote

    One misconception that we’ve seen in the last few weeks is the idea that Google doesn’t take as strong action on spammy content in our index if those sites are serving Google ads. To be crystal clear:

    – Google absolutely takes action on sites that violate our quality guidelines regardless of whether they have ads powered by Google;

    – Displaying Google ads does not help a site’s rankings in Google; and

    – Buying Google ads does not increase a site’s rankings in Google’s search results.

    That’s Google’s "crystal clear" position on the matter. Whether you want to believe it or not is up to you. This will likely be questioned for years to come – never proven or disproved. With eHow still ranking so well in Google, the disbelief of some will no doubt continue. 

    Jason Calacanis on Content Farms and Huffington PostJason Calacanis, who has been in the headlines today due to layoffs at Mahalo, shared some thoughts on Quora about Google search quality and its relationship to AdSense. On whether or not ad spend with Google influences natural search position, Calacanis,  whose site Mahalo was hit hard by the Google algorithm update (hence those layoffs), says, "No way."

    He wrote:  "These two sides of the business have a 100 foot chinese wall between them. I know, because over three companies and tens of millions of dollars in google adsense revenue I can tell you that when we had an issue with Google search even *ASKING* the revenue side resulted in a response like ‘you don’t want us to ask Google search quality for help because they will not listen to us or even let us in the building. Church and state in my experience."

    "Now, I do think that Google *might* be alerted to the existence of a site via things like google chrome, google analytics and google adsense," he added. "This means that the google spider might crawl your site quicker because of these services, but it doesn’t impact your rank in any way."

    He goes on to say that he thinks people get "conspiracy theorist" about it. Like many conspiracy theories, it may not ever go away. 

    Google did devalue a lot of sites that use AdSense. 

    Another Goolger (in the same Quora thread) poitned to this page as the most basic explanation of what affects a site’s ranking.

  • Google Algorithm Update Casualties Speak

    Google Algorithm Update Casualties Speak

    Last week, Google launched a major update to its algorithm, which was positioned as one that would go after content farms. While some sites that are often attached to that label were in fact hurt by the update, some other sites that aren’t generally considered content farms became casualties as well. 

    Was your site impacted by Google’s algorithm update? For better or worse? Let us know

    Now, it’s important to note that Google did not come out and use the phrase “content farm” when it announced the update, but the company used language similar to what it has used in the past when talking about content farms. In a nutshell, the algorithm was supposed to be aimed at reducing rankings for lower quality content. Those who found their rankings impacted negatively are not thrilled with having their content deemed as such, and some of the sites that were apparently devalued, do raise some eyebrows. 

    Take, for example, Cult of Mac. This is a tech blog that covers Apple news. It is often linked to by other sources, and frequently appears on Techmeme as a source. A lot of Apple enthusiasts visit the site on a regular basis for updates. Leander Kahney, the site’s editor and publisher, wrote a scathing post about Google’s update, proclaiming, “We’ve become a civilian casualty in the war against content farms…Why us? We have no idea. The changes Google has made to its system are secret. What makes it worse is that Google’s tinkering seems to have actually improved Demand Media’s page rank, while killing ours…We’re a blog, so we aggregate news stories like everyone else. But our posts are 100% original and we do a ton of original reporting…”

    “We can go toe-to-toe with any other tech news site out there,” he wrote. “We break a ton of stuff. Go take a look at MacRumors, which is very good at giving credit, and see how often we’re cited as the source of stories…Yes, we report other’s stories, just like Engadget, MacRumors, AppleInsider, Wired, Daring Fireball and everyone else. That’s the news business on the Web. It’s a flow, a conversation…The question is whether we add value — figure out what it means, if a rumor is credible, what the historical context is. We do that and we do it well. Plus we give clear credit where credit is due (unlike the original content stealers like Engadget and Mashable. Try to figure out what stories they ripped off from us).”  Note: those accusations appear to have been removed from the post. 

    Even PRNewswire, the press release distribution service was devalued by Google’s update. Kahney also defended that site, after a commenter on his post mentioned it. He said, “…and for your information, PR newswire isn’t a content farm either. It published press releases for thousands of companies. Crappy spam websites pull releases from its RSS feeds and republish it as pretend content — which may be why it was down ranked by Google.”

    Technorati got hit too. This site was once considered a darling among bloggers, and now apparently it’s been reduced to a low quality site clogging up the search results, based on Google’s doings. CEO Richard Jalichandra doesn’t appear to have acknowledged this:

    So Google changed its algo’s last week to redirect traffic away from content farms…….where did all the diverted traffic go?!less than a minute ago via Twitter for iPhone

    Other sites more often associated with the content farm label, though they’ll pretty much all do everything they can to distance themselves from it, were also hit by the update – sites like Associated Content (run by Yahoo), Suite101, HubPages, Mahalo, EzineArticles, and others. Reports have indicated that Demand Media’s eHow – the site most often associated with the label, was actually helped by the update.

    The notion that eHow was helped has been questioned. Erik Sherman at CBS looks at Compete data, and writes, “What seems to be a jump may be a normal increase, which raises the question of whether it would have been larger without the algorithm changes.” 

    However, if you do some searching in Google, you’ll probably notice that there is still a great deal of eHow content ranking well – and still under questionable circumstances (see “level 4 brain cancer” example discussed previously). 

    Still, Demand Media as a whole was not immune from the update. At least three of their sites were negatively impacted: Trails.com, Livestrong.com, and AnswerBag.com. After the update was announced,  Larry Fitzgibbon, Demand Media’s EVP of Media and Operations, said: “As might be expected, a content library as diverse as ours saw some content go up and some go down in Google search results. This is consistent with what Google discussed on their blog post. It’s impossible to speculate how these or any changes made by Google impact any online business in the long term – but at this point in time, we haven’t seen a material net impact on our Content & Media business.”

    Pia Chatterjee of HubPages tells us, “On our end we think that its really too soon to tell, as after any large update, all the traffic undergoes pretty serious upheaval. All these numbers will be very different in about 7/10 days. What is worrying is that the update did not seem to do what it was supposed to, which was penalize poor content. The fact that e-how has remained untouched is proof of that!”

    “Our CEO, Paul Edmondson says:  We are confident that over time the proven quality of our writers’ content will be attractive to users. We have faith in Google’s ability to tune results post major updates and are optimistic that the cream will rise back to the top in the coming weeks, which has been our experience with past updates.”

    EzineArticles CEO Chris Knight wrote a blog post about how his site was affected, and what he is doing to try and get back up in the rankings.  "While we adamantly disagree with anyone who places the ‘Content Farm’ label on EzineArticles.com, we were not immune to this algorithm change," he wrote. "Traffic was down 11.5% on Thursday and over 35% on Friday. In our life-to-date, this is the single most significant reduction in market trust we’ve experienced from Google." 

    To try and get back into Google’s good graces, EzineArticles is doing things like reducing the number of article submissions accepted by over 10% – rejecting articles that "are not unique enough". It will no longer accept article submissions through a WordPress Plugin. They’re reducing the number of ads per page. They’re raising the minimum article word count to 400. They’re "raising the bar" on keyword density limits. They’re removing articles considered "thin and spammy", and will put greater focus on rejection of advertorial articles. Submitted articles are required to be exclusive to the submitter (but won’t be required to be unique to EzineArticles).  

    Knight also considered adding a Nofollow attribute to links in the article, as “icing in the cake to further prove to Matt Cutts and Google” that they’re not trying to “game Google” or let their authors do so. Interestingly enough, Knight decided to hold off on adding Nofollow after complaints from authors. 

    The first author to complain, in fact, even said, “Not sure what Pollyanna planet you’re from but let me assure you, EzineArticles does not exist ‘to provide information that is beneficial to the readers.’ EzineArticles is a business, not a government organization or charity. EzineArticles was created to make its owner(s) money. There’s nothing wrong with that, but don’t fool yourself into thinking they’re a bunch of do-gooders. By the same token, the majority of us who publish on EzineArticles don’t do so to benefit readers. We too are running businesses, and EzineArticles helps our own websites get traffic and ultimately sales." 

    Yeah, I think Google frowns upon that whole “we’re not writing to benefit readers” thing. 

    Another element of this whole algorithm update is that so far, it is only active in the U.S. Once Google expands it into other countries, the sites that have seen their traffic drop off so far may be in for an even bigger shock. 

    By the way, there are a lot more sites impacted than those discussed in this article.

    In an interview with On the Media, Google’s Matt Cutts was asked: “You have so much market share; you are so much the only game in town at this point that you can enforce these things unilaterally, without hearing or due process, putting the whole online world more or less at your mercy. Is there any process by which the people who are affected by algorithm changes and updates can make a case for themselves?”

    Cutts responded: 

    We have a webmaster forum where you can show up and ask questions, and Google employees keep an eye on that forum. And, in fact, if you’ve been hit with a, what we call a “manual action,” there’s something called a “reconsideration request,” which essentially is an appeal that says, ah, I’m sorry that I was hiding text or doing keyword stuffing and I’ve corrected the problem, could you review this?

    And over time, we’ve, I think, done more communication than any other search engine in terms of sending messages to people whose site has been hacked or who have issues and then trying to be open so that if people want to give us feedback, we listen to that.”

    Cutts later said, “Any change will have some losses, but hopefully a lot more wins than losses.”

    It does seem that Google may be willing to ackwowledge some errors in judgement on the matter, if this exchange between Cutts and Kahney is any indication:

    @lkahney the appropriate people at the Googleplex have heard that report, I’m sure. Feel free to snag me at SXSW if you see me though.less than a minute ago via web

    @mattcutts awesome. let’s hope someone saw it and fixes it. i’m counting on you guys. tx for message. made my dayless than a minute ago via TweetDeck

    I wonder how many more people will be trying to snag Cutts at SXSW. 

    Update: Since this article was written, Cult of Mac has seen its Google rankings return to normal. More on this here.

    Were there more wins than losses with this update? How’s the search quality looking to you? Tell us what you think

    Read more of our ongoing Panda coverage:

    Google Algorithm Update Fallout, eHow Response
    Google Panda Update Winners, Losers, and Future Considerations
    EzineArticles Hit By Google Panda Update Again
    Google Panda Update Hits Demand Media’s eHow This Time
    Google Panda Update Benefits Google Properties
    Ranking in Google Now That Panda Has Gone Global
    Google Panda Update Winners: Video, News, Blogs, and Porn
    Google Panda Update Victim Xomba Loses AdSense Ads Too
    Google Panda Update Officially Goes Global (In English)
    Google Panda Update Launched in More Countries
    Google Panda Update – Made for Big Brands?
    Google Does Guest Post for Panda Victim HubPages
    Examiner’s Approach to Content Quality Post Panda Update
    MerchantCircle Goes From Panda Victim to Blekko Curator
    More here.

  • Calacanis on Google Algorithm Aftermath and Impact on Mahalo

    Calacanis on Google Algorithm Aftermath and Impact on Mahalo

    As previously reported, Mahalo is reducing its staff by 10% as a result of the loss of revenue and traffic from Google’s most recent algorithm update. We reached out to Calacanis for comment on the situation. 

    He told us, "All we can do is put our heads down and continue to make better and better content. If we do our job I’m certain the algorithm will treat us fairly in the long-term."

    "The 90+ members of our team are rallying around this challenge, and you will continue to see amazing content from experts with real credentials at Mahalo.com," he added.

    Hey @charliesheen, I’m having a rough week… any chance I can swing by for breakfast at your place?less than a minute ago via web

    Mahalo is re-evaluating its freelance content production strategy, and is even pausing it for the time being. The company’s video unit is still going strong, however, which Mahalo says is encouraging it to ramp up video production. 

    Google has been talking about refining the update, to let some of the higher quality content that got hit work its way back up in the rankings. We’ll see if Mahalo recovers. 

  • Google Algorithm Update to Get “New Layer” to Help “Falsely Caught” Sites

    As we discussed in another article, Google’s recent algorithm update aimed at content farms had some apparently unintended casualties. One of these was the Apple news blog Cult of Mac. Publisher Leander Kahney wrote a scathing post about the update, clearly furious over Google knocking their search rankings (and traffic) down as if they were a content farm. 

    News from the publisher, however, indicates that there is hope for some of those wronged by the update. As we reported before, Kahney was talking to Google’s Matt Cutts on Twitter about the issue:

     

    @lkahney the appropriate people at the Googleplex have heard that report, I’m sure. Feel free to snag me at SXSW if you see me though.less than a minute ago via web

    @mattcutts awesome. let’s hope someone saw it and fixes it. i’m counting on you guys. tx for message. made my dayless than a minute ago via TweetDeck

    Later, Kahney tweeted the following:

    @mattcutts Good news: CultofMac back to normal on Google today. They fix it @Googlplex, or is the algorithm getting better for everyone?less than a minute ago via TweetDeck

    Kahney also told Wired, who picked up the story, "The site is miraculously back. Everything looks great. I’m wondering if it was you talking to them, but it was back in the index pretty early this AM." 

    For some additional context there, the Wired piece discloses that Kahney was Wired.com’s managing editor and then news editor, until he left about two years ago to run Cult of Mac full time. This background in legitimate news (as opposed to content farming), coupled with Cult of Mac’s ongoing practice of legitimate news would no doubt be key indications of the site’s authority in search. 

    Google’s Amit Singhal told Wired that Google "deeply" cares about the high quality sites, but that Google won’t manually change "anything along these lines."  He continued: "Therefore any time a good site gets a lower ranking or falsely gets caught by our algorithm — and that does happen once in a while even though all of our testing shows this change was very accurate — we make a note of it and go back the next day to work harder to bring it closer to 100 percent…That’s exactly what we are going to do, and our engineers are working as we speak building a new layer on top of this algorithm to make it even more accurate than it is."

    There are a lot of site owners out there that feel they have been wronged by Google’s update. Most will tell you that they produce quality content. I guess as Google continues to add "layers" to the update, we’ll see how Google really feels about certain sites. 

    Demand Media’s eHow was expected to be devalued with the update, but reports indicate it was actually helped, though several other Demand Media properties were hit. It will be interesting to see if these properties find their way back up into the rankings. 

    Mahalo has gone so far as to start reducing its staff over the changes. It will also be interesting to see if Mahalo content finds its way back up, and if so, if those jobs are saved. Look at what EzineArticles is doing to try and get back into Google’s good graces.