WebProNews

Tag: Coca-Cola

  • Twitter Works to Make Advertisers Feel Safe

    Twitter Works to Make Advertisers Feel Safe

    Twitter is taking steps to ensure advertisers feel safe on its platform, a vital step for the company’s long-term growth.

    One of the biggest challenges social media companies face is balancing individuals’ right to express themselves with companies’ efforts to protect their brand. Facebook ran afoul of advertisers in June when the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) found many ads from high-profile companies placed alongside content that would be deemed racist and offensive. As a result, Coca-Cola, The Hershey Company, Levi Strauss & Co, Verizon, Mozilla, Upwork, REI, Patagonia, Ben & Jerry’s, The North Face and Eddie Bauer were just a few of the companies that pulled their advertising from the platform.

    Twitter is working to prevent that kind of scenario, with a new focus on brand safety, according to Business Insider.

    “We want every brand to feel confident advertising on Twitter,” said Sarah Personette, Twitter VP of global client solutions, in an interview. “Brand safety is a critical component to that.”

    The company has committed to audits by the Media Rating Council. Certification by the MRC is considered the gold standard, providing some assurance the platform’s systems are operating without bias. Twitter is also planning to announce third-party partnerships in the coming weeks, aimed at promoting brand safety.

    At a time when Twitter is working to stay relevant amid the onslaught of newer platforms, and is trying to walk the moderation tightrope, this is a critical step for the company’s success.

  • High-Profile Companies Join Facebook Advertising Boycott

    High-Profile Companies Join Facebook Advertising Boycott

    Multiple high-profile companies have joined the ranks of those boycotting Facebook advertising over racist and violent content.

    Facebook has been under increasing pressure over what many perceive as a tolerance for racist and violent posts and groups, which Facebook says fall under free speech. In the wake of George Floyd’s death, and the renewed focus on equality, Facebook’s policy of non-interference isn’t flying with other companies.

    The movement comes following the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) calling out Facebook for tolerating posts and groups that promote racism and violence. A quick search by ADL researchers showed major companies’ ads side-by-side with content many would deem offensive.

    “Facebook has been claiming that it is effectively addressing hate on its platforms. ADL and others, however, have continued to expose egregious examples of online hate, misinformation and extremism across the company’s products, particularly on Facebook and Instagram,” reads the ADL’s open letter. “Whether or not these posts technically violate Facebook’s complicated guidelines around hate speech, as a result of the platform’s casual placement of ads, paid advertisements run a risk of being placed next to divisive (and sometimes blatantly hateful) content. Indeed, even a cursory investigation conducted by ADL’s analysts immediately surfaced examples of prominent brands’ advertising displayed on newsfeeds next to hateful and conspiratorial content. Although we have not spoken to these companies, we can assume that their intentions when buying advertising on Facebook did not include being displayed alongside such content.”

    As a result of the ADL’s open letter, company after company has pulled their advertising from Facebook and Instagram. Coca-Cola, The Hershey Company, Levi Strauss & Co, Verizon, Mozilla, Upwork, REI, Patagonia, Ben & Jerry’s, The North Face and Eddie Bauer are just a few of the organizations that have joined the boycott.

    The lost revenue appears to be having an impact, as Facebook has started announcing changes to their policies in response. Whether these changes will go far enough remains to be seen.

  • Microsoft Scores Five-Year Coca-Cola Contract

    Microsoft Scores Five-Year Coca-Cola Contract

    Microsoft has announced a five-year contract with Coca-Cola to modernize and standardize the beverage company’s software.

    The contract covers Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365 to provide an integrated solution, as opposed to the fragmented systems the company was using. An integration solution will also help Coca-Cola gain valuable insights from the data it collects. In particular, Dynamics 365 will apply artificial intelligence to drive insights.

    “At The Coca-Cola Company, innovation and growth are key pillars of our business,” said Barry Simpson, senior vice president and chief information and integrated services officer of The Coca-Cola Company. “This partnership with Microsoft allows us to really step change our employee experience through replacing previously disparate and fragmented systems. These platforms allow us to deliver relevant, personalized experiences as we network our organization.”

    “Coca-Cola is a pioneer and forward-thinking leader in its industry,” said Judson Althoff, executive vice president, Worldwide Commercial Business, Microsoft. “Today, the company is taking its digital innovation a step further, leveraging Dynamics 365, Microsoft 365 and Azure to better connect people and opportunities through breakthrough productivity and powerful information management that will drive continued business success over the next decade.”

    The contract is a big win for Microsoft as it continues to make headway in the cloud marketplace.

  • Brominated Vegetable Oil Eliminated From Powerade

    Coca-Cola has now eliminated a controversial ingredient from its line of popular Powerade sports drinks.

    According to an Associated Press report, some Powerade flavors sold in at least three states and Washington, D.C. no longer list brominated vegetable oil as an ingredient. A Coca-Cola spokesperson told the AP that Powerade is “BVO-free,” but provided no further details of the change. Bottles of Powerade can still be found on store shelves containing brominated vegetable oil, suggesting that the switch has occurred only recently.

    Brominated vegetable oil is an emulsifier commonly used in soft drinks, particularly those with citrus flavoring. In addition to Powerade, Fanta Orange, Fresca, Mountain Dew, and other sodas include the ingredient.

    Brominated vegetable oil was generally recognized as safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until 1970. Since that time, the use of the ingredient has been heavily restricted in the U.S. Use of the ingredient as a food additive is limited to just 15 parts per million. The ingredient is banned for use in food in the European Union and in Japan, where brominated vegetable oil use was banned in 2010.

    The news of Coca-Cola dropping brominated vegetable oil from Powerade comes just over one year after the company’s main competitor did the same for its sports drink. In January 2013 PepsiCo announced that it was eliminating brominated vegetable oil from its citrus-flavored Gatorade sports drinks. PepsiCo still includes the ingredient in its Mountain Dew soft drink.

    The move for companies to voluntarily eliminate brominated vegetable oil from their sugary drinks is a relatively new one. Attention was brought to the issue through a popular Change.org petition started by a young woman from Mississippi. The petition points out that brominated vegetable oil has been patented as a flame retardant by some chemical companies and questions why the ingredient is still used in U.S. sports drinks when other countries obviously receive versions of the same drinks without it.

    Image via Coca-Cola

  • Coca Cola’s ‘America The Beautiful’ Ad Causes Controversy

    This year Coca Cola ditched its lovable polar bears, opting instead for  for a more arousing Super Bowl commercial.

    Coca Cola chose to go with an ad that they had to have known would spark controversy — but some call that good marketing. After all, the Super Bowl came and went and we’re still talking about the commercial.

    The commercial in question is dubbed “It’s Beautiful”. The ad features a selection of people representing several ethnicities and singing the patriotic song “America the Beautiful” in eight different languages some of which were English, Hindi, Arabic and Tagalog.

    The commercial even show two men rollerskating with their daughter. According to GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation), this was the first Super Bowl ad to feature a gay family.

    The ad seemingly attempted to show America as an inclusive and culturally diverse country but many people were not thrilled.

    The main point of contention with the ad, especially among Conservatives,  is that “America the Beautiful” was not sung entirely in English. The view of many is that America is a country routed in its own culture and traditions, part of that culture is the use of English. However, it should be noted that America does not have an official language.

    “If we cannot be proud enough as a country to sing ‘America the Beautiful’ in English in a commercial during the Super Bowl, by a company as American as they come — doggone we are on the road to perdition,” said Allen West, former GOP Rep.

    Many took to social networks like Twitter to express their dissatisfaction with Coca Cola’s ad.

    As you might expect, there were some in favor of the multilinguistic ad.


    Image via YouTube

  • Coca-Cola, “America the Beautiful” Ad Causes Stir

    These days, people love to be outraged. Whether their outrage comes from a tweet they’ve seen and found offensive, or from a song they think is inappropriate, it doesn’t take much for some people to get all bent out of shape over nothing.

    So it wasn’t surprising to learn that a lot of people took to Twitter yesterday to complain about a Super Bowl commercial that showed “America the Beautiful” being sung in different languages.

    The controversial ad came from Coca-Cola, and it pretty much followed the same concept of a lot of Coke commercials from the past.

    In the spot, the “America the Beautiful” song starts out in English, but eventually it’s sung in other languages to represent two things: One, that people all around the globe enjoy Coca-Cola and that somehow binds us together, and two, that America is a true melting pot with a multitude of different cultures.

    But, a lot of people didn’t see things that way, and they were highly offended as a result. From there, a #BoycottCoke campaign was created.

    “An insulting commercial to our incredible country,” wrote one person. “America the beautiful in a different language is just unacceptable,” wrote another. “Disrespecting my country with that awful commercial,” wrote a third.

    However, a good number of people responded to the #BoycottCoke negatively, and blasted the folks who are supporting it. “So several Americans are #BoycottCoke because they felt the commercial was un-American,” one person Tweeted. “Grow up USA. Welcome to multiculturalism.”

    “Welcome to America,” another person wrote. “Now speak any language you like. That is freedom. Don’t #boycottcoke.”

    Now whether the controversy behind the Coke commercial goes away quickly or whether it makes people debate each other for a long period of time remains to be seen, but better believe that it won’t take too long until folks are outraged yet again. For some reason, being outraged and offended all of the time is the new American way.

    Image via YouTube

  • Coca-Cola Laptop Theft Could Endanger 74,000 People

    The Coca-Cola Company made the announcement on Friday that they recently had a possible security breech when several of its company laptops went missing.

    The soft drink corporation said that several of their employee laptops were stolen from the Coca-Cola headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, and could have compromised the information of over 74,000 people.

    Reportedly, these laptops contained data that revealed private information including names, addresses, social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and credit card information – for thousands of employees, both in the United States and Canada.

    Although the laptops disappeared months ago, they were recovered in December, with no known issues.

    The company did discover the theft quickly, and immediately notified about 18,000 of its employees that had their social security numbers stored on them, with the remaining 56,000 that had less sensitive information, such as drivers license numbers as well.

    Coke spokeswoman Ann Moore said the laptops were stolen by a former employee who had been assigned to maintain or dispose of equipment.

    Ms. Moore said the security breach included personal information of about 4,500 individuals who were company contractors or vendors. Credit-card information for fewer than 10 people was on the stolen laptops, she said.

    What is extremely questionable is the fact that even though Coca-Cola maintains a policy that all company computers be encrypted, the stolen laptops had not received their customary encryption protection.

    Because of this possible threat to its employee’s personal information and the breach it might cause, Coke is offering its employees a year of free identity theft protection as an apology.

    Coke said the laptops were later retrieved and it has “no indication” the personal information had been misused.

    In a memo by Coca-Cola to its employees, they wrote, “To expedite the process, we brought in extra crews that worked long hours, including throughout the holiday period and on weekends, to sort through the data.”

    Coke said that as of Friday, no arrest has been made.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons

  • Coca-Cola Stolen Laptops Held Personal Employee Info

    The Wall Street Journal reports that up to 74,000 of former and current Coca-Cola employees’ personal information could be compromised due to a recent Atlanta headquarter theft.

    An employee, who was promptly fired, was assigned to dispose of the laptops but instead attempted to steal them late last year. The laptops were once assigned to human resources staff, and held social security numbers, credit card numbers, drivers license numbers and other personal information.

    Although Coca-Cola was notified of the information on the laptops on the tenth of December last year, it only began to inform employees on Friday. Coca-Cola explained the wait on needing to investigate the content on the laptop, and if any of the information was misused. Coca-Cola released in a statement that the company “brought in extra crews that worked long hours, including throughout the holiday period and on weekends, to sort through the data” in order to give precise information to the employees as well as the public in their official statement.

    Coca-Cola has concluded that no information has been used for malicious purposes, and that they notified employees affected within the legal time period.

    The breach affects not only Atlanta Coca-Cola employees, but all North American employees of the largest beverage company in the world. The company sold its first bottle of Coke in Atlanta on May 8, 1886, and has played a major part in the city’s economy since.

    No arrests have been made in regards to the attempted theft, along with no explanation as to why the laptops were discarded before the information on them were not encrypted. Much information is being withheld at the time due to the ongoing law enforcement investigation. If you feel that you may be affected by this incident, look for correspondence from Coca-Cola this week, or contact the headquarters at (404)676-2121.

    Image via WikiCommons

  • Monster Drinks: Is Coca Cola Looking to Buy Them?

    Anyone who has either visited a gas station or been around teenage boys for any length of time in the past ten years is probably familiar with Monster, which is a specific, popular brand of energy drink. The drink has a sort of cult following behind it (often made up of the aforementioned teenage boys), and has become even more popular over the years by inextricably linking itself to the popular Call of Duty video game franchise, as well as building awareness and publicity for young athletes.

    Monster’s publicity is not all good, however. The company and its energy drinks have been under fire lately because of allegations that the brand markets to children. This is problematic because the drinks are not particularly healthy; in fact, they are often harmful, and have even proven to be deadly on occasion, as is the case of the incident that lead to the current lawsuit. The lawsuit rests on the accusation that, although Monster drinks are proven to be harmful to “children, pregnant women, and people sensitive to caffeine,” the company still markets its goods to children.

    Despite this recent bout of bad publicity, however, there are rumors abounding that Coca-Cola may take steps to acquire Monster Beverage Corp. Rumors such as these are not uncommon, and the two companies have negotiated previously, although nothing was settled upon. The possibility is becoming more and more concrete, however, as Coca-Cola is looking seriously into expanding into the energy drink market.

    Monster has seen tremendous growth in its worth since the first talks with Coca-Cola back in 2011, rising from being worth around $11 billion to $16 billion. Although the cost would now be higher, Jack Russo, an analyst at Edward Jones & Co., thinks that it would still be profitable for Coca-Cola to make the purchase. He was quoted as saying, “A transaction like this would give a buyer a huge, huge base in the energy drink category.”

    Russo was also careful to warn, however, that lawsuits and other existing problems and stigmas surrounding the energy drink market certainly need to be taken into account. “Certainly any buyer that wants to get into this category has to look at the regulatory environment and see that there are a lot more alarm bells going off about energy drinks,” said Russo. That brings up the question, then, of whether or not Coca-Cola will decide that Monster’s profitability is worth its somewhat infamous stigma.

    What do you think? Would it be a good move for Coca-Cola to buy out Monster?

    Image via Twitter.

  • How Prohibition Made Soda the King of Beverages

    A new book by author Tristan Donovan called Fizz: How Soda Shook Up The World was excerpted this week in the Atlantic, and he argues that Coca-Cola has the 1920’s Prohibition movement to thank for its rise to glory.

    As most history buffs will tell you, the 1919 enactment of the Volstead Act (a product of the Temperance Union combined with the Anti-Saloon League) ushered the United States into an era of alcohol prohibition. Shortly after it was passed, the pharmacy/drug store became the first stop on the road to getting hammered.

    Donovan writes that “in 1921 alone, pharmacists withdrew more than eight million gallons of medicinal whiskey from federal warehouses, twenty times the amount they dispensed before Prohibition.”

    Prohibition agents quickly got wise to the scheme, and “suspect medicine” started being rapidly seized from local pharmacies. Donovan notes one 1929 raid in Meridian, MS that netted the feds a soda fountain liquor ring after reports of young men and women “getting hilarious” while drinking Coca-Cola.

    The fountains in question dispensed a mixture of Coke and something called “Jake,” a dangerous black-market alcohol concoction. Jake was made from fermented Jamaican ginger plants, but it contained a highly toxic adulterant that was supposed to fool the feds. After a couple weeks of selling Jake-laced cola, between 15,000 and 100,000 people were rendered impotent or crippled for life from the toxic effects (the way these people walked would be referred to as “Jake leg”).

    As any teenager could tell you, when adults say you shouldn’t have something, one often simply wants the forbidden fruit that much more. The Jazz Age appeal of drinking saw hundreds of people of both sexes and all ages booze their way through Prohibition using mixed drinks and chasers, which were uncommon until alcohol was illegal.

    Donovan wrote, “In speakeasies they would order “set ups” of cracked ice and ginger ale or club soda into which they could discreetly slip a measure of bathtub spirit from their handy and oh-so-chichi hip flasks. Cola may have overtaken ginger ale as America’s favorite fizz by the dawn of the Jazz Age, but the appeal of the latter as a mixer drove its sales to new highs in the 1920s.”

    Nobody knows exactly where ginger ale came from, but most attribute its origins to an American apothecary named Dr. Thomas Cantrell, who popularized a sweet, dark, yeast-fermented drink around 1850. A second beverage inspired by Cantrell’s, Vernor’s 1866 ginger ale, had created a reputation for being so fizzy that its consumers often sneezed. Vernor’s still exists today as America’s oldest soda brand.

    Neither of their ginger ales held a candle to the third brand, none other than Canada Dry. Created by a Canadian pharmacist named John McLaughlin, he promoted his ale as “the champagne of ginger ales” at the suggestion of his wife.

    Ginger ale became one of the most popular mixers. Indeed, it became so popular that in 1923, two businessmen from either side of the Canada-U.S. border decided to buy his business for a million in cash. They directly appealed their business to Prohibition-era drinkers, and in under 4 years, sales of 1.7 million bottles turned into 1926’s 50 million. Surveys of the era suggested three out of four ginger ale bottles were used by alcohol drinkers to mask the taste of bootleg liquor.

    None of the ginger ales, however, could compare with the empire that would become Coca-Cola. If you want to read more about the fantastic journey of soda pop, which includes many curious anecdotes about the beginnings of the Coca-Cola corporation’s modern advertising campaign, you should check it out here.

    [Image via Wikimedia Commons]

  • Diet Coke’s Artificial Sweetener Causes Sales Drop

    There have been a lot of growing concerns lately over the artificial sweeteners used in Diet Coke and other foods and beverages. We’ve heard for years about how certain artificial sweeteners can cause cancer and heart disease and contributes to obesity (which the FDA says isn’t true). Now America’s favorite diet soda, Diet Coke, is experiencing a bit of a drop-off in sales because people are worried about the safety of its artificial sweetener, aspartame.

    Steve Cahillane, president of Coca-Cola America, acknowledged that Diet Coke sales were down three percent last year because of growing concerns over artificial sweeteners. Cahillane made the surprising admission during a conference call with industry analysts on Tuesday.

    Diet Coke sales “are under a bit of pressure as people are questioning ingredients [and] ingredient safety,” said Cahillane. “There are headwinds that we’re facing,” Cahillane added. “This is just one of them.”

    Despite the drop in sales, Cahillane says that Coca-Cola isn’t changing Diet Coke’s recipe anytime soon. Diet Coke is still the number two selling soda in the world, right behind Coca-Cola. Even though safety concerns are an issue with Diet Coke (and pretty much all diet soft drinks), it’s easy to see why the Coke execs aren’t looking to change things up anytime soon.

    Are you concerned about artificial sweeteners or will you keep drinking Diet Coke or another diet beverage? Respond here.

    Is Aspartame Dangerous?

    While the American Cancer Society says that researchers haven’t found any solid proof that aspartame is linked to cancer in humans, there is some proof of an increase in blood cancer in lab animals. This alone isn’t enough to get aspartame labeled unsafe, though. The American Cancer Society also says that no other health issues have been linked conclusively to aspartame.

    The FDA also says there isn’t enough proof that aspartame is dangerous enough to ban it. The “FDA finds no reason to alter its previous conclusion that aspartame is safe as a general purpose sweetener in food.”

    Image via YouTube

  • Sprite for Hangovers: The Ultimate Cure?

    From hot coffee to cold showers, humans have anxiously sought the mystical remedy that is the perfect hangover cure. However, thanks to a Chinese food study that was published in the September 2013 issue of Food and Function, that painful, drunken search has finally come to an end… in the form of a 12-pack of Sprite from the nearest store.

    While excess alcohol consumption notoriously leads straight to the land of headache and nausea, the chemical breakdown is more responsible for the pain than all that beer and whiskey last night.

    The researchers narrowed down the specific chemical byproduct that’s causing hangovers: acetaldehyde, which eventually becomes acetate when it’s digested by the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). Acetaldehyde is formed when ethanol is metabolized by alcohol dedhydrogenase (ADH).

    The study’s objective involved finding a method to quickly purge acetaldehyde from the body, and the research team tried 57 different beverages, teas, and carbonated drinks to see their effect on ADH and ALDH metabolism rates. Herbal teas tended to slow down the process, which would probably leave one feeling hungover for a longer period, while carbonated drinks like Sprite and soda water sped up the ALDH activity. In theory, increased ALDH would speed up the conversion process, shortening the length of a hangover.

    An expert in medical science from the University of Exeter in the UK, Edzard Ernst, commented to ChemistryWorld that, while interesting, “These results are a reminder that herbal and other supplements can have pharmacological activities that can both harm and benefit our health.”

    The Daily Mail was told by consultant hepatologist Dr. Rajiv Jalan of University College Hospital in London that young people produce more ADH than their elders, leaving them feeling more chipper after a weekend bender. However, as we age, our brains shrink into the hollow chasm of our skulls, allowing more room for the alcohol-induced swelling that causes hangover-related headaches.

    [Image via Wikimedia Commons]

  • Apple And Google Are Now Bigger Than Coke

    Apple And Google Are Now Bigger Than Coke

    The big Best Global Brands report from Interbrand has been released, and for the first time, Coca-Cola is not the number one brand. It actually fell to number three, with Apple and Google holding the first and second spots respectively.

    In fact, Coca-Cola is sandwiched in between tech companies, with IBM holding the number four spot, followed by Microsoft at number five and GE at number six. Rounding out the top ten are McDonald’s at number seven, Samsung at number eight, Intel at number nine and Toyota at number ten.

    Global Brands

    Some other noteworthy tech and Internet companies on the list are Cisco at number thirteen, HP at number fifteen, Oracle at number eighteen, Amazon at number nineteen (one of the “top risers”), SAP at number twenty-five, eBay at number twenty-eight, Seimens at number forty-five, Facebook at number fifty-two, Nokia at number fifty-seven, Dell at number sixty-one, and Adobe at seventy-nine.

    It will be interesting to see if Coca-Cola can climb back up next year, but it’s not looking good, considering recent stories about its products contributing to obesity, and things like this:

    Of course, it’s not as though Apple and Google are without their brand problems. Apple’s new iPhone has already shown that its fingerprint sensor security technology is hackable, and Google is frequently in the news for privacy-related issues.

    “Every so often, a company changes our lives—not just with its products, but with its ethos. This is why, following Coca-Cola’s 13-year run at the top of Best Global Brands, Apple now ranks #1,” said Jez Frampton, Interbrand’s Global CEO. “Tim Cook has assembled a solid leadership team and has kept Steve Jobs’ vision intact – a vision that has allowed Apple to deliver on its promise of innovation time and time again.”

    The total value of all 100 brands listed in the report is $1.5 trillion (up 8.4% from last year). Apple’s brand value, according to Interbrand, is $98.3 billion.

    Chart: MarketingCharts

  • Coke Formula Claim Goes Up For Auction

    Coke Formula Claim Goes Up For Auction

    Every few years someone pops up with a claim that they’ve uncovered the legendary formula for Coca-Cola. The soft drink company has kept the formula a carefully guarded secret for decades, and always shoots down claims. In 2011, public radio show This American Life spoke with one of the people who claim to have the original formula, but Coca-Cola officially denied the authenticity of the recipe:

    Now, another person has come forward with what they believe to be the world’s most sought-after formula. According to an NBC 11 report, a Ringgold, Georgia man named Cliff Kluge states that the has “accidentally” found the formula.

    The man told reporters that he and his wife bought a box of letters at an estate sale. The box contained a cola recipe that Kluge believes is the real deal. He states that it is very similar to the recipe uncovered by This American Life.

    Kluge is now auctioning off the formula on eBay, asking for a starting bid of $5 million and a Buy Now price of $15 million.

    Coca-Cola has stated, as it always has, that this formula is another in a series of failed attempts to recreate Coca-Cola, and that the only copy of the real thing is locked in a vault in Atlanta.

  • Spotify Gets New Funding From Goldman Sachs, Coke [Report]

    Spotify has attracted a new $100 million round of funding, valuing the company at nearly $3 billion, according to various reports.

    According to the New York Times’ Media Decoder, Coca-Cola is becoming a minority investor in the company as part of the round, and that Goldman Sachs is contributing about half of the investment, with Coca-Cola contributing 10% and Fidelity Investments also contributing 15%.

    News came out in April that Spotify had partnered with Coca-Cola. The announcement was that Spotify would provide technology for Coca-Cola Music globally. Coke would integrate Spotify into its Facebook Timeline media.

    “Coca-Cola is the most recognized and respected brand in the world and we are proud to be their music partner,” Spotify CEO Daniel Ek said at the time. Spotify and Coca-Cola both believe that music, technology and creativity can connect people around the globe.”

    There has been no official announcement or statement from Spotify at this point.

  • Coke And Pepsi Contain Small Amounts Of Alcohol

    Paris-based National Institute of Consumption (INC) has released a study saying that more than half of leading colas contain the minute traces of alcohol. The study found that even the big brands, like Coke and Pepsi, contain .0001 percent or 10mg in every liter. The amount is minuscule, but the figures will still be enough to upset the thousands of Muslims who regularly drink Cola because their religion forbids them from drinking alcohol.

    Of 19 colas tested, the nine which did not contain alcohol were made by brands including Auchan, Cora, Casino, Leader Price and Man U-Cola. Ten which had traces of alcohol in them included Coca-Cola, Pepsi Cola, Coca-Cola Classic Light and Coke Zero.

    Michel Pepin, scientific director for Coca-Cola France, said: ‘It is possible that traces of alcohol come from the process’ of making Coca Cola according to its secret recipe. He insisted, however, that Coca-Cola drinks were provably ‘soft’ and recognized as such ‘by the government authorities in which they are sold’. Mr Peppin went on to add that “the Paris Mosque has provided us with a certificate stating that our products can be consumed by the Muslim community in line with the religious opinions of the Committee of the Mosque of Paris.”

    Coca-Cola was invented in 1886 by the American John Pemberton and was originally patented as a medicine which could cure everything from headache to impotence. It has since gone on to dominate the international soft drinks market and is now a US icon sold in more than 200 countries.

    Art courtesy of coca-cola-art.com

  • This Coke Machine May Give You Much More Than A Beverage

    From time to time, Coca-Cola will set up what it calls a Coca-Cola Happiness Machine. Basically, it’s a Coke machine that gives away prizes.

    The company has taken to social media to promote the machine and drum up interest in Coke (as if that’s lacking), posting about it on Twitter and YouTube.

    People who use Coke’s Happiness Machine may get things like Soccer balls, cupcakes, digital cameras or bicycles, to name a few. The company is giving away 4,000 prizes throughout the summer, from the machine, which will reside outside of the World of Coca-Cola at Pemberton Place in downtown Atlanta.

    “Unlike in the past, people now can plan to visit a Coca-Cola Happiness Machine,” said Russell Jacobs, General Manager of Retail and Attractions for The Coca-Cola Company. “With this machine, the question is no longer where will happiness strike again, but when – and who knows, you might be next.”

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

  • Obesity and Coca-Cola Do Not Go Hand in Hand, CEO Claims

    Obesity in adults and children has been linked to a number of foods and beverages over the years. According to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sugary drinks such as Coca-Cola are to blame, as well. So concerned is he about the expanding waistline of his citizens that Bloomberg is attempting to impose a ban on these 16-ounce liquid calorie bombs. What about going back for refills, you ask? I’m sure he’s working on that problem right now.

    In an attempt to separate themselves from such negative press, Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent recently sat down with the Wall Street Journal for an interview, which was published on Monday. During the chat, Kent spoke frankly about Bloomberg’s plan to rid the city of their extra pounds by limiting their intake of sugary beverages.

    According to Kent, the company doesn’t feel they are responsible for the increasing number of obese individuals who are currently living — and dying — in our country. So ridiculously overweight are we that the United States recently ranked as one of the heaviest nations in the world. In case you were wondering, that’s not an accolade to be particularly proud of. Unless, of course, unchecked gluttony is your reason for living.

    “We’ve gone from being a single-beverage, single-brand company to now 500-plus brands, 3,000 products. Eight hundred of these products we’ve introduced in the last four or five years are calorie-free or low-calorie,” Kent said in defense of his products. “It is, I believe, incorrect and unjust to put the blame on any single ingredient, any single product, any single category of food.”

    If Bloomberg has his way, Coca-Cola, along with other carbonated beverage manufacturers, will see their products dispensed in limited quantities at restaurants, delis, and various entertainment venues. The ban, oddly enough, does not include diet, fruit, dairy or alcoholic drinks, the latter of which are notoriously high in calories.

  • Colorless Coca-Cola Can Could Reduce Pollution

    Here is an artist’s conception of a can of coke that uses no paint, which can introduce pollutants into the environment when they are printed and when when they are borken down for recycling. The project comes from award winning artist Ryan Harc of London. The convex shape is imprinted on the can giving it both form and texture without introducing pollutants during the printing process.

    According to Harc: “A convex logo substitutes colorfully sprayed can. Naked can help to reduce air and water pollution occurred in its coloring process. It also reduces energy and effort to separate toxic color paint from aluminum in recycling process. Huge amount of energy and paint required to manufacture colored cans will be saved.Instead of toxic paint, manufacturers process aluminum with a pressing machine that indicates brand identity on surface.”

    The original design won the Biennale Internationale Design award at the end of 2010, but was never picked up by Coke. It’s a shame. This design would have caught on, or at least would have been popular as a promotional tool. At least for a short time.

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

  • Study Reveals Brand Preferences by Political Party: Are you a BMW or a Jeep?

    Buyology Inc.’s new study takes a look at subconscious brand attachments and reveals some interesting contrasts between Democrats and Republicans. What they found is that sometimes the values of your political party give rise to certain brand preferences.

    Not surprising, of the over 200 brands included in the study, the two parties mostly disagree about which are the best, but there was some consensus. Both Democrats and Republican agree that Coca-Cola is their favorite beverage. They also both indicate that Visa is their number one credit card of choice.

    Who is number one in technology and gadgets? They both chose Apple and Google as the top most desired brands (I am sure most would agree). Beauty products, which seems like an odd place to find consensus, had them both agreeing that Olay is their favorite brand.

    Gary Singer, Founding Partner & CEO of Buyology Inc. comments on the interesting results of the study:

    “Both candidates and brands have never fought harder for our affection and our votes,”

    “It’s never been more important to understand why people make the choices that they do. Brands can learn a lot by having a deeper understanding of the deep-seated connections that drive our decision-making.”

    So, now for the contrast you’ve all been waiting to hear about; are you a Jeep or a BMW? But I think you already know the answer to that one. If you’re a Republican, you most likely prefer a BMW, and if you’re a Democrat, you most likely desire a Jeep. Almost cliche, is it not?

    Republicans prefer Sharp for electronics and Democrats prefer Sony. As far as gaming systems, Republicans prefer XBOX and Democrats prefer Wii. Coffee? Starbucks for the Democrats and Dunkin’ Donuts for the Republicans.

    Most Democrats chose the NFL as their most desired sport, while Republicans chose MLB. The most desired restaurant? Republicans said Subway and Democrats said Wendy’s.

    As far as what they watch on television, Democrats like Animal Planet, and Republicans prefer the History Channel. Most Democrats prefer Progressive for insurance coverage, while Republicans typically go with Allstate.

    Interesting results. As with any good research study, the results seem to reflect what many could have guessed, especially when we are talking about automobiles and television programming preferences. I doubt this knowledge will help them do a better job running the country, but it’s still fun to take a look at.

    It makes me wonder, what’s going on with families that have a BMW and a Jeep in the driveway?

    (Image courtesy of Utahhousedemocrats.com)

  • Coca-Cola In Talks To Buy Monster Beverage Corp

    It was reported today by the Wall Street Journal that Coca-Cola is considering buying energy drink maker Monster Beverage Corp. On news that Coca-Cola was looking into the acquisition, Monster’s stock went up 11% pushing Monster’s market value to $11 billion. If Coca-Cola pulled this off it would be the largest ever acquisition for the world largest beverage maker.

    When asked about the possible purchase, a Monster spokesperson said, “it is the company’s policy not to comment on rumors.”

    This is not the first time in the last few years that rumors have circulated regarding Coca-Cola’s acquisition of Monster, due to the fact that Coca-Cola distributes the energy drink.

    The purchase of Monster by Coca-Cola would prove to be difficult because of the price tag attached. At $11 billion, any company in America would be hard pressed to come up with that kind of cash.

    Update:

    After trading for the day had ended, Coca-Cola was asked about a possible take over of Monster and this is what they had to say: “We are not in discussions to acquire the Monster Beverage Corporation.” They will consider a partnership but are not trying to acquire them.

    Update: Coca-Cola says it’s not in talks to buy Monster Beverage. $20 gain in $MNST shares evaporates. 19 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

    Coca Cola says it’s not in discussions to buy Monster Beverage, blames “Assy” taste. 20 minutes ago via Echofon ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto