WebProNews

Tag: Campaign 2012

  • Celebrate Election Day with a Bad Lip Reading of the Debates

    Hopefully, by the end of the night (or early tomorrow morning), we’ll know who won the 2012 Presidential election. Even if something strange happens and we have to wait a little while for the official results, one thing is certain: the campaigning is over. The ads are done, the debates are done. America, it’s over.

    In celebration of that, Bad Lip Reading has just unveiled their awesome take on the 2012 debates – the first Presidential debate, the VP debate, the town hall debate, and the foreign policy debate.

    So, go vote and make your voice heard. And then sit back and watch Obama, Romney, Biden, and Ryan spew nonsense. I’m sure that plenty of you feel that that’s been going on for months already, but I’m pretty sure none of the candidates have mentioned Mufasa until now.

  • On Election Night, Gloat to Your Political Frenemies with These GIFs

    On election night, the chances are pretty high that your Facebook and Twitter streams will be inundated with policial posts. Some of your friends will rejoice, others will be apoplectic. Thus is the nature of bitter political contests. Many users will simply stay off social media in an effort to avoid the political bickering – but if you want to throw yourself into the fray, you’ll need a few GIFs as ammunition.

    If your candidate is victorious (and assuming we have a victor on election night), you may want to antagonize your friends by rubbing it in – just a little bit. If you have a little troll inside of you waiting for the perfect opportunity to strike, let me offer eight GIFS to link to when responding to a politically-charged status update or tweet.

    First, if President Obama is reelected:

    (image)

    (image)

    (via)

    (image)

    (image)

    (via)

    And if Mitt Romney wins:

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

    (image)

    (via)

  • The Electorate Isn’t Completely Uninformed, and We Can Give Some Credit to Facebook

    The pessimist inside every participating member of a democracy thinks that the electorate is full of completely uniformed voters who will pick candidates based on their tie color, much like a disinterested sports follower will pick March Madness teams based on their mascots. While there is plenty of evidence to suggest that they may be correct, a new study from Pew shows that at least a significant chunk of the electorate is at least attempting to inform themselves through online videos.

    Of course, breaking from the ranks of the uninformed doesn’t imply that you’ll break from the ranks of the misinformed, but that’s a whole other argument.

    Voters in 2012 have a distinct advantage over voters of the past. The internet and the rise of online video has given them a wellspring of information. Sorting through all of it to find the good and weed out the bad is one thing – but at least it’s all there for the taking. Pew’s study finds that a significant portion of registered voters are viewing and sharing online political videos this election season.

    55% of all registered voters and 66% of internet-savvy registered voters say they’ve taken to the interwebs to watch online political videos this season. Here’s a more specific breakdown:

    • 48% of internet-using registered voters watch video news reports online about the election or politics
    • 40% watch previously recorded videos online of candidate speeches, press conferences, or debates
    • 39% watch informational videos online that explain a political issue
    • 37% watch humorous or parody videos online dealing with political issues
    • 36% watch political advertisements online
    • 28% watch live videos online of candidate speeches, press conferences, or debates

    And Pew says that 40% of internet-using voters have accessed said political videos via social media recommendation.

    Is there a party line discrepancy? Not really, says Pew:

    “There are very few partisan differences when it comes to watching political videos, or to having them recommended by other people. Democratic and Republican voters are equally likely to have watched political videos online this election season, to have recommended online political videos to other people, and to have received such recommendations from others. However, registered voters who identify as liberal are more likely to have had political videos recommended to them on a social networking site this election season than moderate or conservative voters.”

    Information is out there, if you’re willing to find it. In future elections, the availability of streaming and static video will only increase. While we can’t know the exact content of the videos this sample of the electorate accessed, we do know that over half were engaged enough to seek it out.

  • Google Breaks Out the Political Scorecards in Time for Election Day

    Guys, it’s almost over. The 2012 Presidential race has made the final turn and has entered the homestretch. Like any good horse race, this is the most exciting time – especially if you’re living in one of the highly-contested swing states.

    Did I say exciting? I meant unbearable, excruciating, exhausting, and miserable. If you’re in Ohio, Virginia, Florida, or a handful of other states – chances are you’re up to your eyeballs in campaign ads. Now, thanks to Google, we can see just exactly how much each candidate is spending in these key swing states, as well as get some insight into how the candidates are being searched across the network.

    The Google Politics & Elections team has just published this infographic on spending, searches, and new results in eight key swing states. What we see is a big spending gap between President Obama and Mitt Romney, with the former taking a pretty big lead. We also so that in most areas, President Obama has garnered more search interest. Check it out:

    Swing State Spending and search interest from Google

    Google has also put out a scorecard of some Google-related stats including Google+ followers, YouTube views and subscribers, and search interest (nationwide):

  • Foursquare Unveils New Voting App for Election Day

    Today, Foursquare unveiled the new “I Voted” app. Powered by the Google Civic Information API, the app will give you everything you need to know to make you a good citizen and informed voter.

    Well, maybe not a truly informed voter – Foursquare isn’t run by magicians. But it will give you some basic info on where to be, what you’ll need, and what your choices are on November 6th.

    “Connect the ‘I Voted’ app to your Foursquare account today. You’ll be able to find your polling station and learn about the candidates and propositions that will be on your ballot ahead of time,” says Foursquare. It will also provide you with voter ID requirements in whatever state you’re voting in.

    Foursquare says that the voting initiative is a combined effort with Engage, the Voting Information Project, Pew, and the New Organizing Institute.

    If information wasn’t enough of an incentive to connect the “I Voted” app, they’re also offering a special election day badge for anyone who includes the #ivoted hashtag inside their check-in and the polling location.

    One of the more interesting parts about the announcement is the unveiling of election.foursquare.com. As of now, it’s just a gateway to the “I Voted” app. But the company tells users to check back on election day to “see America voting in real time.” There’s also a map on the page, so I’m assuming we’re going to get to see voters checking in at their polling places all across the country. Pretty cool.

    A few days ago, Google launched their own voter information tool.

  • Twitter’s New Interactive Map Shows Where Political Tweets Mattered the Most

    Back in August, Twitter launched their own Political Index (TPI) to track Twitter users’ general feelings about the Presidential candidates. The index is calculated using an algorithm that weighs the sentiment of tweets mentioning Obama or Romney as compared to hundreds of millions of tweets on various other topics. Whatever number pops out is a percentile score, showing that tweets about said candidate are more positive than X% of all tweets.

    For instance, President Obama’s TPI is 32, unchanged from yesterday. Mitt Romney’s TPI is 25, down 3 points from yesterday.

    Today, Twitter is unveiling another politically-themed analytics dashboard – this time in the form of a Political Engagement Map. Instead of looking at how everyone’s tweets reflect on the candidates like the TPI, this new interactive map looks at how the candidate’s tweets resonated with everyone.

    “Here’s how it works: Select Tweets, represented by a bar, from the left or right columns. Tweets are organized by engagement level, and the size of the bar indicates the level of engagement that Tweet received. Hovering over the bar previews the Tweet text, and clicking on it will show you the state by state engagement level. You can also search for specific terms to see Tweets from @BarackObama and @MittRomney about the topics that matter most to you,” says Twitter.

    As of now, the most engaged the population ever was with a single tweet was on September 6th:

    That tweet saw the highest engagement in Kansas, Mississippi, Texas, Georgia, District of Columbia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Florida, Connecticut, North Carolina, Nevada, and New Mexico. It saw the lowest in Idaho, New Hampshire, Vermont, and New Jersey.

    Of course, “engagement” on Twitter entails retweets, favorites, and replies and such. Engagement doesn’t necessarily equate to support, or even any sort of positive feedback.

    Once you’re done looking at the varying engagement levels of a single tweet across the states, you can re-filter the map to show “noteworthy reactions,” or places where the tweet was an outlier (meaning it saw a higher or lower engagement level than usual in that state). For Obama’s college tweet, the state of South Carolina showed a very noteworthy reaction.

    You can also click on each state to see the list of tweets that made the most noise there. The state view will also tell you which five political topics saw the most engagement in that state. For instance in Kentucky, gay rights tweets from Obama showed the most resonance. Among tweets coming from Mitt Romney, it was the topic of energy and the environment that saw the most buzz.

  • Calculate How Much Obama & Romney Are Willing to Spend on Your Vote

    It’s no secret that both the Obama and Romney teams are doing all they can to get your vote on November 6th, and they have been for quite some time. Much of that effort is directed toward your online activities, as the campaigns want to know what you browse and how you click – as it helps them better target the ads you see across the interwebs.

    A recent report from a tracking software monitoring company suggests that these efforts are being ramped up considerably as we approach election day. They found 76 different tracking programs on President Obama’s campaign site, up from 53 in May. They also found 40 on Mitt Romney’s site, compared to 25 in May.

    This data mining is used is a way similar to online retailers, who compile information on online shoppers and show them relevant ads onsite and on other sites using tracking cookies. This makes sense, when you think about it. Picking a candidate for higher office is just one big shopping adventure, right?

    But just how much are you worth to the candidates? Online privacy company Abine has created a tool to calculate how much your vote is worth, in a tangible dollar amount.

    All you have to do is answer a few questions about your voting and online habits, and the tool takes from various sources to give you a number. For instance, my vote was worth $30.

    Vote worth calculator

    Here’s what Abine has to say:

    “The Obama and Romney campaigns have been tracking your online activity to determine how you will likely vote and how much they should spend to influence your vote (or maybe secure a campaign contribution). The 2012 Presidential Election Val-You calculator uses your answers to seven questions and data from the campaigns’ finance reports, the 2010 U.S. Census and Abine’s proprietary tracking data about online tracking to estimate your actual value to the campaigns based on the characteristics online tracking can unearth – your demographics, voting history, online activity, etc.”

    If you’re in Ohio, let’s say, with a history of voting both ways – I’m sure your designated ad spend will be through the roof. Consistent voters living in Alabama – I’m guessing you’re not that high on the campaigns’ ad blitz list.

  • Google Compiles Voting Info into One Easy Tool

    Google knows that people use their service to find information on voting: when, where, how, who, etc. In order to make it a little easier, Google has compiled all of this information into one place, and they call it their Voter Information tool.

    You can access the tool here. Just enter your home address and that’s it.

    The voter tool shows your election-day polling location, as well as early voting locations (if applicable). On the right, you have a full summary of the ballot you’ll see in the voting booth – including national and local races. Each candidate on the ticket is provided with links to their Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, and official campaign sites.

    Here’s what the tool looks like when you enter your address:

    “The tool is easy to embed on any website and is open source so developers can modify it to create custom versions. We’re working with a number of media partners to ensure the tool is accessible across the web, and partners like Foursquare and AT&T are doing great work building apps on our Civic Information API.

    We hope this tool will help make getting to the polls and casting your ballot as simple as possible,” says Google in a blog post.

    Google’s Voter Information Tool is nestled within their larger Politics & Elections hub, which also provides election trends, insights, results, and links to various other resources on Google+ and YouTube.

  • Sick of Politics on Facebook? Give Them the Boot with New Chrome Extension

    Back in August, a new Chrome extension popped up that allowed users to block any post relating to anything that popped out. With a click of your mouse, you could remove all your friends’ mentions of their babies from your news feed, replacing them with photos of cats, cars, porn – whatever you wanted, really.

    Now, baby photos have been usurped by political posts to take the annoyance crown. It’s election season, and if you’re tired of “participating” in the national political discourse – there is a way out.

    From the makers of unbaby.me comes unpolitic.me, “a chrome extension that removes politics from your FB and Twitter feeds permanently––by replacing the BS with awesome stuff.”

    “[It’s] the surest way to ride out the rest of the election without bothersome posts, opinions, and links from your politically savvy ‘friends.’ Install the app. Refresh your Facebook newsfeed. Enjoy an Obama AND Romney free life,” says the extension’s creators, Side Project.

    Just like their previous extensions, this content-blocker allows users to create a keyword blacklist upon launch. They provide you with a pre-populated list, which includes keywords like romney, obama, election, voting for, republican, democrat, ron paul, 47 percent, binders, debate, and many more. But if you have a friends that won’t shut up about a certain topic like “immigration reform,” or another former candidate like “Rick Santorum,” you’ll have to add them manually.

    Once your blacklist is set, you can then add multiple feeds to serve as the content generators for your replacement posts. By default, your friends’ political posts will be replaced with photos of cats from Instagram.

    All that’s left to do is sit back and enjoy your Facebook news feed the way it was meant to be enjoyed – full of posts about people’s lunch and app suggestions.

    [via BuzzFeed]

  • The Debates Drew 24 Million Streams, Says YouTube

    The Debates Drew 24 Million Streams, Says YouTube

    With the Presidential debates in our rear-view mirror and the election less than two weeks away, YouTube has taken some time to reflect on the viewership numbers from their live streams. 2012 was the first year that YouTube streamed the debates, and according to them, they had a pretty successful debut.

    According to YouTube, the four debates had 24 million views worldwide. Those views came from people of 215 countries.

    Naturally, the United States had the highest viewership. Here’s the rest of the top 10, in terms of viewers (in order):

    Canada; Australia; New Zealand; United Kingdom; Mexico; Brazil; Singapore; Japan; and France.

    YouTube says that the live streams weren’t the only times the debates saw international interest:

    “The worldwide interest didn’t stop with the live streams. The New York Times’ uploads of the first three debates have seen close to 13 million views, making them the most-viewed videos on their channel ever. Outside the United States, these videos have been viewed most heavily in the U.K, Canada, India, Germany, Australia and France — with almost half the views coming from outside the U.S.”

    You can check out all of this campaign season’s debates below (all three Presidential and the one Vice Presidential).

  • Watch the Third Party Candidates Debate Live on YouTube

    Watch the Third Party Candidates Debate Live on YouTube

    Tonight, the final Presidential debate takes place between Democratic incumbent Barack Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney. And although those are the two candidates for America’s highest office that you hear about the most, there are actually other people running to be President.

    You won’t see them at tonight’s debate (third parties haven’t been invited since Ross Perot in 1992), but you can watch them debate each other, live, on YouTube.

    Participants in the minor candidate debate include Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party), Jill Stein (Green Party), Virgil Goode (Constitution Party), and Rocky Anderson (Justice Party). You can watch the debate on the Ora TV YouTube channel starting at 9 pm ET on Tuesday, October 23rd. Al Jazeera will also carry the live stream. No major television networks will carry the “Free and Equal” debate.

    Former CNN host and broadcasting legend Larry King will moderate the contest. Interested viewers can still submit possible debate questions to Larry King via Facebook, Twitter, and reddit. You can find those submission portals here.

    The third-party debate is being sponsored by Free and Equal Elections, a non-profit organization whose goal is to “ensure an fair an open electoral process for all.”

    “It is our belief that a true democracy fosters a climate where all voices are heard regardless of political party or persuasion,” they say. “An electoral process where every individual has a chance of winning is vital in a democracy and we here at Free and Equal will continue to ensure every voice is heard by making the electoral process fair and open for every participant.”

    No matter your political beliefs, I think most of us can agree that the more ideas, viewpoints, and solutions that we allow to break into the public discourse, the better. This is just another example of the internet succeeding where television failed.

  • Romney’s Binders Full of Women Remark Gives Birth to Crappy Flash Game

    Romney’s Binders Full of Women Remark Gives Birth to Crappy Flash Game

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: this election is weird, and it’s being made weird by the internet. And I’m not saying this is a bad thing – at all. All I’m saying is that it’s hard to imagine having social networks like Twitter and Facebook around with their current reach during Bush v. Gore or Clinton’s impeachment.

    Mitt Romney sure knows that the internet has probably changed elections forever. He saw a gaffe, slip of the tongue, misunderstood statement, calculated dig at half the population – whatever you want to call it – go viral this week. His “binders full of women” remark at Tuesday’s town hall debate blew up almost instantly and has yet to really die down.

    And now, you can play a hastily-made flash game based on the pop culture phenomenon. Yes, the instructions make no sense, and yes you are given the really odd time limit of 80 seconds (?), but you do get to catch falling silhouettes of women in a binder. In front of the White House.

    Anyway, play it or don’t play it. All I can do is lead a politically exhausted voter to water.

    [via Kotaku]

  • Jimmy Kimmel Proves Our Electorate Is Made Up of Liars

    Who do you think won this year’s First Lady debate? Ann Romney? Michelle Obama? I’m sure whoever came off as more knowledgeable and agressive without being condescending is the victor in the eyes of the public.

    Oh, there’s no such thing as a First Lady debate? Right.

    Don’t tell that to these liars. Jimmy Kimmel took to the streets to ask people who they thought performed better in the non-existent contest. It’s great to know that people have such strong opinions coming directly from their ass.

    Make sure you watch the whole thing, a surprise lurks at the end:

  • Second Presidential Debate Sees 7.2 Million Tweets

    Last night’s town hall debate saw the two Presidential candidates go at it for a little over an hour and a half on topics both foreign and domestic (mostly domestic). We’ve already told you how the Twittersphere reacted to one particular moment involving binders full of women, and now we have the official tweets statistics from Twitter themselves.

    According to the social media site, 7.2 million tweets concerning the debate were sent last night during its 90-minute duration. For comparison, last week’s Vice Presidential debate saw 3.5 million tweets and the first presidential debate saw over 10 million total tweets.

    Out of those tweets, most of them were about the economy (28%). 17% were about taxes and 16% were about foreign policy. At last week’s VP debate, foreign policy won the night with 26% of the total tweets.

    If you think Romney’s “binders” remark or one of various sparring matches between the candidates would have been the most-tweeted-about moment of the night, you’re wrong. Romney’s response to an audience member’s question on immigration actually won the night with 109,560 tweets per minute (TPM). Obama telling Romney that he’s “the last person to get tough on China” came in a close second with 108,619 TPM. Finally, Romney’s discussion on tax rates received 107,386 TPM.

    If you missed last night’s town hall debate, you can watch it in its entirety below:

  • Binders Full of Women: The Comment That Launched a Thousand Social Media Pages

    Last night’s second Presidential debate saw the two candidates clash over mostly domestic issues, with a few foreign issues sprinkled in. The town hall format meant that audience members got to ask the questions, and one particular response from Mitt Romney to a question on gender equality in the workplace led the social media world to go crazy creating pages and accounts.

    Here’s Romney’s statement, for context:

    An important topic, and one which I learned a great deal about, particularly as I was serving as governor of my state, because I had the chance to pull together a cabinet and all the applicants seemed to be men.

    And I – and I went to my staff, and I said, “How come all the people for these jobs are – are all men.” They said: “Well, these are the people that have the qualifications.”

    And I said: “Well, gosh, can’t we find some – some women that are also qualified?”

    And – and so we – we took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet. I went to a number of women’s groups and said: “Can you help us find folks,” and they brought us whole binders full of women.

    And with that, “Binders full of women” exploded across Facebook and Twitter. Social insight firm Topsy says that Twitter activity spiked to its highest point of the night during the discussion of discrimination in the workplace. Tweets containing the word “women” peaked at 24,170 per minute at that time.

    Many of them, I would expect, also containing the words “binder” and “full.”

    The odd phrase received plenty of Twitter backlash, most of it looking something like this:

    And within ten minutes of the utterance, Twitter accounts like @BindersofWomen and @mittsbinder were born. @RomneyBinders also now has over 33,000 followers.

    Facebook users also joined the party, creating dozens of “binders full of women”-related pages and groups. A quick search of “women binders” will show you this. Facebook’s Politics and Government team says that Romney’s “binders” comment shop up 213,900% at one point.

    Out of all those pages, one stands proud as the leader. Binders Full of Women has already amassed 243,000 followers and is growing by about 5,000 likes every half an hour or so. Within an hour of being created last night, the group had already garnered over 80,000 likes.

    Binders Full Of Women

    Gov. Romney clearly misspoke. What he meant to say was that his platform wants to bind women to the 19th century.

    The page even had Facebook employees impressed with its rapid growth:

    There’s even a “Binders Full of Women” Tumblr that already has dozens of posts.

    (image)

    (image)

    As you would expect, the Obama campaign team is jumping on the phrase as well:

    People say that the internet has made this campaign unlike any other campaign in history. Man, are they right.

  • Vice Presidential Debate Saw 3.5 Million Tweets

    Last week’s first Presidential debate broke a Twitter record. With over 10 million total tweets coming in from start to finish, it became the most tweeted-about event in U.S. politics. Could the Vice Presidential debate live up to that sort of social media chatter?

    Not quite. But it did draw an impressive crowd.

    Twitter confirms that last night’s VP debate garnered 3.5 million total tweets from the beginning to the end. When the time is not a factor, 4 million tweets were sent out concerning Joe Biden and Paul Ryan’s contest.

    According to Twitter, 26% of those tweets concerned foreign policy, 21% were about the economy, and 16% specifically dealt with the topic of taxes. Twitter also highlights the top moments of the debate in terms of “tweets per minute.” Biden’s “Now you’re Jack Kennedy?” quip won the night with a spike of 58,275 TPM. Paul Ryan’s statement that “they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar turning Medicare into a piggybank for Obamacare” came in second, with 55,540 TPM.

    Twitter also identifies the winning buzzword of the night. Unsurprisingly, it was “malarkey.”

    If you missed last night’s Vice Presidential debate, you can watch it in its entirety below:

  • Use Your Facebook Data to Smear Yourself with a Negative Political Ad (It’s Fun, I Promise)

    Use Your Facebook Data to Smear Yourself with a Negative Political Ad (It’s Fun, I Promise)

    There’s a new project out from PBS NewsHour that allows anyone to create political ads for themselves with Facebook data. It’s called Ad Libs, and it’s a fun and informative way to show voters exactly how cookie cutter political ads really are.

    “Do you know how political campaign ads work? How they’re built? What they’re meant to tell you? Most political ads follow a rigid set of guidelines and fall into one of a few categories. We’ve put together a few samples for you to customize with your information and imagination. It’s fun, it’s fast, and you’ll never watch campaign ads the same way again!” says PBS.

    The Ad Lib ad maker allows you to make character ads (pro) and attack ads (negative). Within the attack ads, you can either use the “attack character” or “attack credentials” template.

    Making your own attack ad (against yourself) is easy. Once you log in via Facebook, a boilerplate attack ad begins to play. The video stops at key moments to allow you to insert images and quotes from your Facebook profile.

    First, you’ll choose an unflattering picture. The Ad Libs ad maker puts it in black and white, because we all know that black and white means bad when it comes to political ads. Next, you’ll be asked to choose an “out of context newspaper quote,” which means one of your statuses. You’re then asked to chose even more out-of-context quotes based on your statuses.

    You can replay your video once it’s made, or share it to Facebook. In the end, you’ll have a hilarious attack ad against yourself that looks something like this:

    Of course, you can make a positive ad – but where’s the fun in that?

    [via Gizmodo]

  • Vice Presidential Debate Streaming Live on YouTube [Reminder]

    If you want to see the current Vice President of the United States and the man that could assume that role battle it out face-to-face, tonight’s your only chance.

    At 9 pm ET, Joe Biden and Paul Ryan will meet for the only Vice Presidential debate of the campaign season. The debate will take place at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky and will cover topics both domestic and foreign policy oriented. The debate is scheduled to run for an hour and a half.

    If you don’t have access to a television but do have internet access, you’re in luck. That’s because YouTube is continuing their live coverage of the big political events of the year with a live stream of tonight’s debate, starting at 9 pm.

    YouTube says that last week’s first Presidential debate was one of their biggest live-streamed events ever. YouTube streamed it through their new Elections Hub launched back in August. YouTube will also be streaming the final two Presidential debates later this month.

    Here are some top moments from past Vice Presidential debates:

    YouTube is not the only place to watch the debate live. Xbox LIVE members can also stream tonight’s contest on their consoles, and they can also interact by answering poll questions throughout the duration.

    Head on over to YouTube’s Politics and Elections Hub for more election-themed videos as you wait for the debate.

  • Twitter May Actually Spur People into Making Political Donations

    We already know that this year, social media is a bigger part of the election than ever before. During the Republican National Convention, 4 million tweets were generated about the event. That number more than doubled the amount of tweets sent globally on election day 2008 – concerning all topics. A week later, the Democratic National Convention saw over 9.5 million tweets generated. Last week’s Presidential debate saw more than 10 million tweets (it was the most tweeted event in the history of U.S. politics). Generally, people are more politically engaged on social media this year and candidates are trying harder to reach voters via the medium.

    Now, a new study from Twitter and data analytics firm Compete suggests that developing a Twitter strategy is not just about reaching people to change their minds or lock in a vote. Twitter interaction with voters can actually drive campaign donations in a meaningful way, according to the company.

    According to the study, simply being a Twitter user increases a person’s likelihood of visiting a campaign donation page, by 68%. But it’s exposure on Twitter that really ups the chances.

    “This likelihood increases when Twitter users are exposed to political Tweets either from political handles they follow, retweets by users they follow, Promoted Product campaigns by a political handle, or searches on political terms. Twitter users exposed to any of these kinds of political Tweets are almost twice as likely (97%) as other Twitter users to visit an online political donation page,” says Twitter in a blog post.

    Amount of exposure to political materials on Twitter also plays a big role in donation likelihood. A user exposed to political tweets, promoted tweets, or retweets on 3-7 successive days saw a 31% spike in their likelihood of visiting a donation page (on top of that of a single exposed user); if the user was exposed on 8+ straight days, that chance increased another 76%. Persistence is apparently the right course of action for campaigns – at least on social media.

    According to the study, these “lifts” in donation likelihood did not vary red to blue. Among users, party lines had no impact on the stats.

    Whether or not these Twitter users are actually making donations once they get to the campaign page is unknown. But getting them there is half the battle, right?

  • Google Maps Hot-Button Political Search Terms Across the U.S.

    If you weren’t aware, Google has info on our searches just sitting around. Since we, as a nation, make millions and millions of searches every week, you’d expect that Google has quite a bit of that information.

    Today, they’ve put it to good use by taking some specific search terms and cross referencing them by region to come up with this fun little map of the United States based on popular campaign issues.

    “The United States is a nation composed of unique regions, values, and identities. During presidential election years the media narrative tends to focus on a handful of key swing states. Here on the +Google Politics & Elections team, we wanted to take a step back and examine the nation as a whole. We took seven hot-button political issues and mapped how their +Google search interest varied by state,” says Google Politics in a Google+ post.

    Compiling roughly a year’s worth of searches, Google looked at terms related to gun control, abortion, social security, gay marriage, national debt, tax cuts, and marijuana legalization.

    Where search terms regarding “abortion” were the most searched probably won’t surprise you. The bulk came from southern states like Mississippi, Texas, and Georgia. New York and D.C. also logged high search quantity for the term. States in the west dominated the “national debt” searches, including Idaho, Montana, Utah, and North & South Dakota. My home state of Kentucky led searches on marijuana legalization.

    No comment.

    Check out Google’s map below:

  • First Presidential Debate Undergoes a Bad Lip Reading

    If you missed the first Presidential debate, don’t worry – there are still two more to go. And even if there were no more televised contests it would be cool, because Bad Lip Reading has you covered.

    The folks at BLR have tackled the debate, putting their spin on the Denver showdown between President Obama and Mitt Romney. As a voter, would I suggest getting your information from a Bad Lip Reading episode? Probably not. But I can confirm that it’s a lot more interesting than what was televised last Wednesday.

    Check out Mitt Romney’s slightly Beavis-like giggle below:

    If you’re looking for more Bad Lip Reading goodies from the past few weeks, including some takes on Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan by themselves check here.