Yesterday you may have noticed that your Facebook news feed was very red, and that there were a bunch of equals signs everywhere. This was the result of the Supreme Court beginning to hear arguments on California’s Prop 8 same-sex marriage ban. All of the red equals signs were simply marriage equality supporters, well, showing their support.
The red equals sign was a play on the standard blue and yellow equals sign logo for the Human Rights Campaign.
Today, Facebook has some quick numbers on the top-buzzing terms over the last day, and it looks like equality has won out.
According to Facebook’s Talk Meter, which looks at buzz around specific events, the term “Equality” was the most-used term surrounding the gay marriage debate. Facebook says its use was up 5,000% on Tuesday.
Also:
The top age group talking about the landmark cases yesterday, in advance of oral arguments, was the 35-44 range followed by 25-34 and 45-54.
Geographically speaking, people in Washington, D.C. were buzzing the most in anticipation of the hearings, followed by users in Utah, Oklahoma, Arkansas, California, Oregon, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Colorado.
Here’s Facebook’s full list of the top ten terms buzzing on the network on Tuesday.
Equality
DOMA
Supreme Court
Perry
Kennedy
Prop 8
Kagan
SCOTUS
Scalia
Defense of Marriage
Don’t expect the Facebook buzz for same-sex-related and Supreme Court-related topics to die down today. Tuesday, the court heard arguments on California’s Prop 8. But today, the court will begin to hear arguments on the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which barred many federal agencies from recognizing same-sex marriage (in terms of some benefits and such). Many high-profile tech companies and other American businesses (including Facebook) have filed a amicus brief arguing that DOMA is simply bad for business.
The first weekend of the 2012 NCAA tournament lived up to sports fans’ expectations. There were close games, blowouts, and everything in between. We also saw big name favorites live up to the hype and deliver commanding performances.
But of course, what does everybody want to see?
Yes, there were a few notable upsets – the two most shocking happening when a couple of #15 seeds knocked off a couple of powerhouse #2 seeds. It was the first time in history that two #15s were victorious in one tournament. And as you would expect, those two games sent social media sites like Twitter and Facebook on fire with comments – especially when Lehigh defeated the mighty Dukies.
Social TV analytics company Bluefin Labs tracked social media comments across all the games over the weekend (Thursday – Sunday). According to their research, 2.46 million comments were made, making an average of 49,000 comments per game. And the winner, the most buzzed-about game of the 48, was Lehigh and Duke:
As you can see, it wasn’t even that close. By the word cloud provided, you can kind of figure out why that game drew such a huge response: bracket busting. Plus, the game did involve Duke losing, which tends to please about 95% of the country.
The other big upset, Norfolk State topping Missouri was also popular, drawing 158,000 comments. Purdue vs. Kansas probably grabbed the #2 spot because it was just a spectacular game. The games the came in 4th and 5th according to social media buzz, UK vs. Iowa State and Creighton vs. UNC both had dominating performances from the top seeds.
Matt Groening’s cartoon creation and The Fox TV series “The Simpsons” has set another record with the running of it’s recent milestone 500th episode on Sunday, February 19th. “The Simpsons” is now one of the longest-running sitcoms in television history, saddling up next to “Gunsmoke,” which holds the record with 635 episodes and closing in on “Lassie,” which was on for 588 episodes. The pop culture phenomenon has been creating laughter on the airwaves and couch potatoes for 23 straight seasons. To honor fans, the show opened with a montage of some of the best couch gag scenes from the past 23 years.
Sunday’s celebratory episode delivered an impressive 30% spike in viewership for Fox on an otherwise slow weekend evening. In honor of the show, two Super Simpson fans, Jeremiah Franco and Carin Shreve set a new Guinness World Record for longest continuous television viewing by watching a marathon 86 hours and 37 minutes of The Simpsons. The hoopla around this animated achievement has created an impressive buzz online where the Simpson’s has a remarkable presence and some 40 million Facebook fans.
In a Q&A with the Los Angeles Times on reaching the 500th episode, Matt Groening explains how the Internet enables constant criticism and analysis of every single episode of the show. Even if sometimes painful, Groening believes the great thing about the web is that it allows people to participate.
A surprise for the show was the guest appearance of controversial WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. In the episode, the residents of their beloved hometown, Springfield, decide to send the Simpsons into exile by kicking them out of town for all the trouble they have caused over the years. Marge and Homer go to Assange in an attempt to clear their names. The show’s executive producer Al Jean told Entertainment Weekly, “There was discussion internally whether or not to have him on the show, but ultimately we went ahead and did it.”
The response to the 500th episode has been mixed but very nostalgic. Even the strongest critics have to admire its longevity and faithful fans joke that it could go on forever. Bill Oakley, one of the longtime veteran Simpsons writers treated his Twitter following to a list of episodes that were written but never made it on air.
After teasing the crowd with 30 seconds of glorious movie footage, The Avengers teaser trailer that was shown during the Super Bowl, left those wanting more Avengers footage panting. However, if you were paying attention, there was a “Extended Look at Facebook.com/Avengers.” disclaimer following the teaser, and thanks to Marvel, the extended version of the teaser is now available; however, it still leaves this writer wanting more.
Of course, I’m just being greedy. With that in mind, the extra 30 seconds of the “extended look” makes all the difference in the world. First, here’s the Super Bowl preview:
Truth be told, seeing The Hulk at the end was enough for me, but, the additional 30 or so seconds only adds to the anticipation:
And with that, May 4 can’t get here soon enough. Twitter agrees:
@Metal_Hammer Metal HammerSo we’ve all seen the badass new Avengers trailer and now we’re wondering which is the most metal of the gang. We’re gonna go with Thor.3 hours ago via web · Reply · Retweet · Favorite · powered by @socialditto
Considering what 2012 as in store in the way of summer movies — The Avengers, Spider-Man, The Dark Knight Returns — which one is going to win the summer box office? As it stands, my money is still on the third Batman movie, although, The Avengers is going to pose a stern challenge.
Because of the emo/Twilight reboot approach the new Spider-Man movie is going for — all so Sony doesn’t lose the rights to the movie property — I don’t see it contended with the other two, but then again, considering the success of the Twilight series, people seem to like “woe is me” teenagers, especially when they are super-powered.
Anyone spending a decent amount of time on Twitter this week has probably already noticed that people are excited about Sunday’s Super Bowl. Since the AFC and NFC Championships games concluded and we locked in our Super Bowl matchup, it seems like everyone involved in the game has had their turn as a trending topic – Brady, Eli, Belichick, Victor Cruz.
And it doesn’t hurt that the NFL has made #superbowl a promoted hashtag. Between the actual game, all of the pre-game theatrics, and then the commercials – Twitter is set to be dominated by the Super Bowl all week.
Social media agency Banyan Branch has already been monitoring the Twitter trends surrounding the Super Bowl and have discovered a couple of interesting things. First, and most unsurprising, the Quarterbacks seems to be getting the most chatter. Out of those Quarterbacks, Tom Brady is being discussed the most on the site.
The most interesting trend that they found was that people are actually talking about the Giants more as a team, but talking about people on the Patriots as individuals more. “Giants” beat the “Patriots,” but “Belichick” and “Brady” beat “Coughlin” and “Manning.”
Will the Three Stooges remake be such a monumental mistake, the Farrelly brothers will forever regret making it? According to some experts out there, yes, it will be. The reason for such a stance? The new Three Stooges trailer, which is about as bad as something can be, but don’t take my word for it.
Check it out for yourself:
So yeah, like Slash Film said, this is what happens when passion projects go bad. In the case of the Three Stooges remake, not only have things appear to have gone bad, they have gone really, really bad. This is apparently what happens when you digress away from the original conception to such a degree.
You see, the Three Stooges remake was comprised of an entirely different cast, one that could’ve made this film into something incredibly interesting, even for the non-Stooge fans out there. Since this isn’t a movie blog, per se, you can read more about the evolution of the movie at Wikipedia, but let’s just say the cast we could’ve had and the cast we’ve been given present two entirely different possibilities.
Instead, we get folks from the Jersey Shore showing up.
This indicates the direction the Farrley brothers settled on was the misguided path, especially if the Twitter reaction is anything to go by. Since the trailer hit the tubes this afternoon, the reaction to it has been a strong trend on Twitter. It’s so bad, in fact, I’m left pondering whether or not if the early reaction is so negative, would the creative teams behind the project simply abandon it, even as they are ramping up for the release?
In the case of the Stooges remake, one can only hope:
@eelyajekim Michael Leespending two hours just to get a court date or spending a minute & forty-five seconds watching the three stooges. don’t know which is worse.2 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
@dberga Daniel BergaminiYou know how you update THE THREE STOOGES? You don’t cast the JERSEY SHORE cast to play themselves.54 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
Agreed.
@alexriviello Alex RivielloI’m glad that Three Stooges trailer has all the hot babes I remember from the original show.36 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
@PeterHoare Peter HoareI really hope that The Three Stooges bombs terribly so I never have to sit through another trailer like that ever again.6 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
But then there are those who didn’t think it was that bad, bringing truth to the “different strokes for different folks” saying, although, there is something to be said about enjoying quality as well:
@kdhusanj Karan wow there’s a Three Stooges movie coming out 😀 my dad & I used to watch reruns together all the time, can’t wait!9 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
I don’t know the guy, but the fact that he’s on the fence about the remake, especially after the trailer, makes me question the level of his Three Stooges “obsession.”
Here’s an idea: instead of test audiences for future movies, this is how all quality control for consumable entertainment should be done. Release a portion of it to the public and gauge the social media reaction. If the reaction is as bad it is for The Three Stooges, perhaps an alternative route would be better. In the case of The Three Stooges, the better route was the one that included this:
The iPhone 5 hasn’t even been announced and already people are sure that they are going to buy it. That’s the takeaway from a survey reported by RBC Capital today.
Of course, the next-gen Apple smartphone doesn’t have to be officially announced for people to speculate about its arrival. The most up to date rumors put the iPhone 5 release somewhere in early-to-mid October, with a possible pre-sale kicking off in late September.
According to the survey, 13% say that they are very likely to purchase the iPhone 5, whenever it arrives. 18% say they are somewhat likely. That means that 31% said that that are very/somewhat likely to grab the device when it launches. That’s 6% more than the demand for the iPhone 4 prior to its launch in 2010.
These numbers jump up when talking to existing iPhone users. 66% of them say that they will upgrade to the iPhone 5 when it comes out.
Another interesting stats from the survey is that 54% of current Sprint subscribers and 53% of current T-Mobile subscribers say they are very/somewhat likely to but the iPhone 5 if and when it arrives on their network. The latest reports indicate that it will probably launch on Sprint and possibly launch on T-Mobile.
There’s a new Spider-Man movie coming out next summer, and in a move that’s seemingly to stem the hype the upcoming Batman movie is getting, Sony and Columbia Pictures have released their trailer to the Internet. It’s not a bad looking preview, all things considered, and because of that, Twitter users are responding in volumes. This also demonstrates just how effective Twitter can be when it comes to generating buzz, even for a movie that’s a little under a year away.
While I’m not necessarily a fan of origin stories, especially when Sam Raimi nailed it so well in the 2002 version, the new trailer looks better than I gave the idea credit for, but then again, that’s the nature of making a good preview:
Unlike the upcoming Batman movie’s teaser trailer, Twitter is reacting to the new Spider-Man very well. Granted, it’s not like Twitter hates the Dark Knight, it’s just that the teaser did exactly that: It didn’t reveal much about Chris Nolan’s latest excursion into Gotham City. The Spider-Man trailer, on the other hand, shows views quite a bit of what they can expect next summer, and while I’m normally against movie gimmicks, the first-person perspective of Spidey swinging through New York City was better than I first thought.
As indicated, the new trailer has thrust the “Spiderman” keyword to Twitter trend status, although, quite a few are wondering why Eduardo Saverin is in it:
@MattBinder Matt BinderNot sure if the new Andrew Garfield movie is a Spiderman reboot or a Social Network reboot where Eduardo Saverin gets sweet revenge.2 hours ago via Favstar.FM · powered by @socialditto
@timoni timoni westThe whole time I’m watching the new Spiderman I’m just gonna be like “Don’t you need to catch the Caltrain back to Palo Alto, Spidey?”2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
Meanwhile, some people feel the need to correct those who spell “Spider-Man” wrong:
@Brelston Brett ElstonSpiderman is trending. I will take this opportunity to tell you all it’s SPIDER-MAN. As opposed to Batman, Superman. #wellicare2 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
Not everyone is a fan of the idea of a remake, either:
@luckyshirt luckyshirtThe Spiderman reboot is happening too soon.
It’s like remaking this morning’s breakfast, but making the eggs a little sadder.4 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto
@FilmLandEmpire Laurent de AlbertiWell… I am actually, very, very impressed by Spiderman trailer. Seems darker in tone, maybe more character focused?3 minutes ago via web · powered by @socialditto
Apparently, the implication of that last tweet was that Raimi’s versions of Spider-Man was not character focus. Apparently, that Twitter user had their eyes closed during Spider-Man 2. Nevertheless, the hype is clearly building for what may be another record-breaking Spider-Man movie. Couple that with the incredibly successful Dark Knight franchise, a record-breaker in and of itself, and it looks like next summer may see two movies battling it out to see which one can break the most box office records.
The launch of Google Buzz did not go well, as you may remember. Automatic opt-ins and privacy scares created quite a stir. But Google’s putting the matter behind it, as the search giant has settled a class action suit by agreeing to create a privacy-centric fund.
Google is supposed to contribute $8.5 million to the fund, and according to an official release, most of the money "will go to organizations focused on Internet privacy education and policy, and will make additional efforts to educate users about the privacy aspects of Buzz."
That should be the end of the dispute. After all, Google has changed quite a lot about Buzz since its initial launch, and the company seems to have won over its critics.
Gary E. Mason, a counsel for the plaintiffs, stated, "We feel this settlement has many benefits to class members, including providing a significant amount of money to non-profit groups committed to educating users about Internet privacy and ensuring that Buzz users can join this on-line community without compromising their privacy."
Plus, although this isn’t a point Google’s liable to celebrate, it doesn’t seem like anyone even uses Buzz anymore.
Google should at least be glad to put the PR fiasco behind it, and you can bet the company will be more careful in the future.
Original Article: YouTube announced that it will be streaming the red carpet footage of the Twilight: Eclipse premiere this evening. It’s that big a deal.
"The scene from Hollywood may look nothing like Forks, but all of your favorite vampires and werewolves will be there giving live interviews and greeting fans," says YouTube’s Thomas Henry. "Many of these Twilight faithful have been waiting for up to three days in order to catch a glimpse of their favorite pale-faced friends."
The coverage starts at 5:30 p.m. PT tonight. Watch it here.
If you can’t tune in live (and you still actually want to see it), you will still be able to watch the footage on the Twilight YouTube channel.
Learn about some online marketing strategies they’ve been using for this film here.
As I talked about a couple weeks ago, Google has been making some moves that could greatly increase Google Buzz’s shot at more widespread adoption. This includes the addition of some features, and perhaps more importantly, the release of the Buzz API (announced at Google I/O).
Recent feature additions include a reshare button (basically the Buzz version of the retweet), the release of an XHTML version of Buzz (which can be accessed from many mobile devices like those running Android pre-2.0, BlackBerry, Nokia S60, and Windows Mobile), greater email integration, and the official Buzz Buttons (which can go a long way for the strategic branding of Buzz across content sites all over the web). Do you think Google is improving Buzz?Tell us what you think.
The API should lead to a much richer ecosystem around Buzz, with third-party apps finding new ways for users to get involved with the service – much like third-party apps have done for Twitter.
Famous tech blogger Robert Scoble appears to think Buzz may be ready for a comeback (it did release to much hype, but that has since fizzled out for the most part). He wrote an interesting post highlighting 9 reasons why such a comeback could be possible. Among these are superior mobile features (compared to other social networks), the addition of features in general (he says its getting "close to matching FriendFeed", a service Facebook found significant enough to acquire itself), a good search tool, and possible SEO opportunities to name a few.
He also lists some "significant negatives", which include a lack of noise control, lists, clients, and brands. Read his entire analysis here.
Google’s own Matt Cutts weighed in as well, saying, "Do you remember when you first started on Twitter, and you didn’t know quite what to do with it? Who do I follow? What do I say? I didn’t really "get" Twitter for months. But as I found interesting people to follow and got the hang of it, I began to see the appeal of Twitter and started using it more often. I’ve noticed Buzz is tracing that same trajectory for me: an initial burst, followed by a bit of a slump, and then a steady climb as I found people that make Buzz interesting."
Again the API could go a long way in this regard for a lot of people. Scoble’s point about brands is a very strong one though. I would include celebrities in that category. Remember stars like Oprah and Ashton Kutcher did for Twitter? You just don’t hear that with Buzz.
Gmail might be considered both an advantage and a disadvantage for Buzz. Being a feature of Gmail, it automatically gets in front of Gmail users (though certainly not all actually use it). At the same time, Buzz being a feature of Gmail may be keeping others away from it. Scoble notes that it’s not available as a service that’s separate from Gmail and that it’s "a real bummer."
Buzz just may find its niche in the social web though, if it hasn’t already. It was never presented as a replacement for Twitter or Facebook (at least by Google). In fact, the company has tried hard to distance Buzz from such services, and has repeatedly referred to Buzz as simply a node, and a node that promotes an open web at that.
Some are probably still turned off by the initial privacy fiasco that Buzz launched with, but as Facebook continues to show, privacy concerns don’t necessarily impede growth.
Do you think Buzz has a bright future? Share your thoughts.
Google is starting to make some significant moves that may give Google Buzz a significant boost. For example, this week, a "Reshare" button was announced. This is essentially Google’s version of the retweet. If you follow a Buzz user who posts an interesting update, you can hit the "reshare" button (down with the comment, like, and email buttons) to repost that post to your own Buzz stream.
Reshare only works for public posts. Private posts will not have the reshare link. However, you can reshare posts yourself publicly or privately. If a lot of people you follow reshare the same post, the similar posts will be collapsed.
"You’ll notice that resharing creates a new post, effectively forking the conversation. To fork or not fork was a decision we debated for a while," says Buzz software engineer Sam Goto. "Ultimately, we think forked conversations help create more varied, intimate discussions around a single item. We realize people may want a non-forking version too, so we’re thinking about how to do that as well."
"When there is a chain of reshares, the names of all of the people who publicly reshare the post appear on the original item, even if they’re not directly connected to the original author," Goto explains. "If you share something that ends up getting passed around by lots of other people, it’s pretty cool to see that."
It’s also worth noting that you can "like" a reshare, and that will not translate to a "like" for the original post. This means you can like a comment without liking what the comment is about.
Google also announced that it’s releasing an XHTML version of the Buzz website which can be accessed from many mobile devices like those running Android pre-2.0, Blackberry, Nokia S60, and Windows Mobile. This could go a long way for getting Buzz used by mobile users across a broader range of devices.
Google Buzz launched earlier this year to a great deal of hype – and why not – a potential Facebook/Twitter competitor from the giant that is Google – but much of the "buzz" about Buzz has faded in the months since. In fact, most of the discussion in the media about Buzz has been centered around privacy issues (though that has become considerably less rampant…Facebook has filled that role nicely).
Adding features, such as the reshare feature is a start, but what may have a more significant impact was an announcement that came last week.
During Google I/O, I attended a session in which Google quietly announced the launch of the Buzz API. The news was generally overshadowed by other Google announcements, such as the unveilings of Google TV and FroYo, but with developers getting access to the Buzz API, there is room for much to be done around the service in terms of third-party apps, which should ultimately make Buzz much more useful. That’s what happened with Twitter. Developers like TweetDeck, Boxee, Buzzzy, Klout, Meebo, Seesmic, Vinehub, Shareaholic, and other have already taken advantage of the Buzz API.
It’s hard to say if the general public will find a real need for Buzz alongside Facebook, Twitter and other services, but as Google grows its presence in mobile via Android, and soon into television via Google TV, there will be more potential gateways for Buzz adoption, as well as integration.
Is Buzz headed in the right direction? Do you think Buzz use will explode? Share your thoughts.
In a session here at Google I/O called "What’s the hubbub about Google Buzz APIs," Google announced, well, Buzz APIs.
The session was aimed at "taking a deep dive into building with the Buzz APIs and the open standards it uses, which include ActivityStrea.ms, PubSubHubbub, OAuth, Salmon, and Webfinger."
Chris Chabot, developer advocate at Google announced the launch and a number of partners that have helped the company get it started. Among these: Seesmic, Tweetdeck, and Ping.fm.
The Buzz APIs were introduced under the labs label, as Chabot says, "a few things still need to be developed. We’re still talking to the community."
The APIs utilize Acivitystrea.ms, which defines who performed the action, what they did, and when. There can be other bits of info like mood, context, or location. Everything is geo-enabled.
With Buzz, you can choose whether you want your posts to be completely public or if you want particular people to be able to read them. There are precautions taken within the code that prevent private posts from being used in the APIs. "We don’t want to accidentlly expose private data," says Chabot.
Documentation for the Buzz APIs can be found here.
Google’s Rick Klau points out that homepage for Google Profiles is missing a pretty obvious feature – search. While Google profiles are tied into your Google account as a whole, when it comes to Google Buzz, your Google profile is essentially your Wall. All your Buzz posts appear here, and so do any of your personal links you want people to see.
It is somewhat surprising that Google, being the search giant that it is, does not have a search feature here, where new users could look for other people they know. If you were looking at joining a new social network, you’d probably want to see if you have friends that are already using it. How much could this be impeding the growth of Google Buzz?
Granted, Facebook, the king of social networks doesn’t have a search feature, but look at Twitter’s home page. Search is very prominent. In fact, they made it this way in the era of everybody trying to figure out why they should be using Twitter. Google Buzz still has some convincing to do of its own.
Buzz has often been presented as a Gmail feature, but the profile is really the center of any user’s Buzz presence.
Even if a user does not wish to use Buzz, they may still find value in having a Google profile, given that they appear in search results.
Klau notes that if you use Chrome, you sill have a way to search through profiles, and if you visit your own or somebody else’s existing profile, you will find a search box at the bottom.
"Yes, adding a search box to the Profiles page is going to happen Real Soon Now," says Klau.
That will be one improvement. I’m thinking they should consider adding a Search Buzz field to individual profile pages as well – not to search for users, but to search for content. Remember how much more useful Twitter became with a search feature (granted, there is a Search Buzz button within Gmail)?
Earlier this year Google added a new product to the already overflowing social-space. Its name was Buzz and it instantly found itself in the same category (mainly for the built-in Gmail userbase) alongside both Twitter and Facebook. Based on all the hype surrounding Buzz, it seemed we were getting ready for the fight of social-space supremacy.
Fast-forward a few months
After the initial hype-fest died down, and the dust settled, most of the positive buzz has dissipated. What we’re left with are privacy concerns, a rampant spam problem and copyright issues from users. In an effort not to be totally negative in regards to Buzz, it should be noted that Google has been very quick addressing / fixing certain aspects of the service.
This past week we asked the question, “Would you consider Google Buzz to be a flop?” on our WebProNews Facebook page. We were surprised by some of the answers left by our fans. My personal favorite comes from Steve Blaze; he states that Google Buzz is the biggest flop since the Edsel. (For those of unfamiliar with the Edsel, it was a brand of car from the Ford Motor Company with a disastrous history so therefore “Edsel” has become synonymous with failure).
One has to ask, why is Google having such a hard with social media? In many ways Google was a pioneer of social media, with their Orkut service (which is still immensely popular in both India and Brasil – but now the US where it counts).
Recently Chitika, an online advertising network, did some research within their network and found some interesting data pertaining to Buzz.
The report goes on to say… ”February 9th, 2010 – the day Buzz was launched – the search engines lit up with queries. The Chitika network saw about 1,500 searches that day for the term “Google Buzz,” approximately 15 times the number of searches for “Twitter.”
However, those searches dropped off quickly – on February 10th, there were 580 searches; on the 11th, 147. From the 12th on – only three days removed from Buzz’s much-hyped launch – searches for Google Buzz failed to break three digits, and in most cases elicited less than 10 searches per day. During the same time, searches for Twitter remained fairly stable, averaging about 87 searches per day.”
What are some possible fixes for Google Buzz?
Social media users want services that make there experience easier… not just another service that brings nothing new to the table. There are numerous things that Google could add / tweak to make Buzz more user friendly, specifically here are 5 things that I would like to see…
1.) Lists – Twitter has them and so should Buzz.
2.) Groups – Again, Twitter has them so should Buzz.
3.) Hide all comments – until I want to see comments" option.
4.) Comment moderation – block directly from the comments (like on FriendFeed).
5.) Content filter – Don’t show me any photos from Picasa or posts from a specific user.
Something else that would’ve made this list is Buzz not pulling tweets in real-time. It appears as though this issue maybe getting fixed, a recent message from Josh Wills, an engineer on the Buzz team, explained…
"Okay, change is out everywhere. Here’s the scoop: we’re doing an experiment where we’re going to trust the timestamps on tweets (and by "experiment," I mean rolling it out to everyone, everywhere, all at once.) The net effect of this should be to do away with "tweet dumping", where you’re buzzing along and a whole bunch of tweets show up all at once because we just crawled them and push your page all around. Now, if a tweet shows up at the top of the stream, it will be because it just happened, or because a buzzer commented on it.
Personally, I really like Twitter, and I want better integration between Twitter and Buzz. My hope is that this is a temporary change until we work out a way to play nicely together that is beneficial to everyone."
So Google Buzz might not be exactly what we expected when it first launched earlier this year… but only time will tell if it becomes a major player in the social-space.
Do you see Google Buzz becoming a major player? Or will it just fizzle out?Tell us what you think.
Ready or not, Google Maps fans, here Google Buzz comes. Following all other sorts of product integrations, Google’s now made it possible to combine its Google Buzz layer of data with the desktop version of Google Maps.
This really does make for a significant trend. In just the past month or so, we’ve discussed a Buzz widget for Android, the integration of Buzz with Google Apps, the blending of Buzz and Gmail for mobile, and a tie-in with Blogger.
Of course, whether these steps are entirely welcome may be a different story, considering that the majority of Buzz users appear to be bots and an international group of data protection authorities is still protesting Google’s rollout of the service.
We’ll leave all that alone for the time being, though, and move on to the most recent development. A post on the LatLong Blog explained it by stating, "We’ve received a lot of requests to make the Google Buzz layer available on desktop Google Maps, and today we’re doing just that."
The post then continued, "To view the Google Buzz layer from your computer, go to Google Maps in your web browser and select Buzz from the More… menu in the top right corner of the map. Find an interesting area like your neighborhood and select any available icon to see what’s going on there. In the post’s window, click on the name to see the author’s public profile, the timestamp to comment on the post, or the place to see it in Maps."
It looks like Google isn’t going to be able to put Buzz’s initial privacy problems behind it anytime soon. Late yesterday, representatives from Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, and the UK all signed a letter expressing concerns about the service and Google’s privacy practices in general.
The data protection authorities weren’t too hard on Eric Schmidt (to whom the open letter was addressed); they recognized that Google’s participated in many discussions regarding privacy, and that the company’s just one of many operating in a similar fashion. Also, they applauded the manner in which Google responded to complaints about Buzz.
Still, what follows is definitely the takeaway point: "It is unacceptable to roll out a product that unilaterally renders personal information public, with the intention of repairing problems later as they arise. Privacy cannot be sidelined in the rush to introduce new technologies to online audiences around the world."
Then the data protection authorities later stated that they’d "like to receive a response indicating how Google will ensure that privacy and data protection requirements are met before the launch of future products."
So it looks like Google will face a lot more international scrutiny due to its mishandling of Buzz’s launch, even if the company isn’t hit with any immediate sanctions or fines.
Google Buzz, which still seems to be struggling to catch on with any sort of mainstream audience (or even a sizable niche one), has been given another opportunity to connect with people. Blogger users will now be able to promote their posts with the new-ish product.
Chang Kim, a Blogger product manager, explained on Blogger Buzz late yesterday, "[W]e’re excited to announce that Blogger has made it easy to share to Google Buzz via the Share button in the Blogger navigation bar. Just click ‘Share’, choose Google Buzz, and you’ll be able to customize your message before posting to Buzz."
Then one more interesting comment followed. Kim wrote, "We are committed to make the sharing experience better on Blogger: more updates are on their way, so please stay tuned."
Anyway, it should be interesting to see if Buzz gets a boost in popularity thanks to this development. To be fair, the move isn’t an illogical one. As the above picture shows, Blogger users could already promote their posts through Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader; it would almost be stranger if Google didn’t add its latest "social" product to the list.
This step follows a pattern that involves pairing Buzz with Google Apps and Gmail for mobile, too.
Earlier today, we reported that Google Buzz is, in a sense, getting serious – it’s supposed to be integrated with Google Apps in the near-ish future for the sake of enterprise and government users. But it’s getting sort of casual, too, landing in Gmail for mobile this afternoon.
No app downloading or menu digging is required in order to make this combination work. iPhone and Android device users can take advantage of the development just by visiting Gmail.com.
Then, as software engineer Alex Kennberg explained on the Official Google Mobile Blog, "[Y]ou’ll see buzz in your inbox on your phone just like you do in the desktop version of Gmail, complete with the little Google Buzz icon."
Also, "When you open a buzz post from your inbox, you can perform all the standard functions, such as liking the post or commenting, just as you can from the desktop Gmail inbox."
Making Buzz more accessible might help solve its popularity problem, insofar as current users are liable to act as advertisements for the service while playing around with it in public. There’s a chance people will transition from being light users to heavy users as they get the option to interact with it more, too.
Google Buzz should get another shot at life in a few months’ time. A new report’s indicated that the service, which has so far been a flop with normal users, will finally be integrated with Google Apps and given a chance to operate in more formal environments.
Kim Hart wrote earlier this morning, "Government agencies that have adopted Google’s Gmail service may start to notice their employees sharing more personal information. . . . In a few months, Google wants to incorporate its social networking Buzz feature into enterprise versions of Gmail, The Hill has confirmed."
This may seem a little counterintuitive; since Buzz has upset regular people, tossing it at individuals who know government secrets, deal with large sums of money, and/or have an increased need to manage professional reputations is potentially unwise.
Google’s learned some lessons about privacy and tweaked Buzz since its initial launch, though, increasing the odds that this rollout will go well. Also, the enterprise environment represents another opportunity for Buzz to shine, given that the tool is suited to simplifying long, multi-participant email conversations.
It should be interesting to see how Google Apps users respond to this move as the integration plans become more definite.
Congressman John Barrow (D-GA) along with a number of other lawmakers sent a letter last week to the Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz calling for the protection of consumer privacy rights and an in-depth review of Google’s public release of personal consumer information
"We are writing to express our concern over claims that Google’s ‘Google Buzz’ social networking tool breaches online consumer privacy and trust," said Congressman Barrow.
"Due to the high number of individuals whose online privacy is affected by tools like this – either directly or indirectly – we feel that these claims warrant the Commission’s review of Google’s public disclosure of personal information of consumers through Google Buzz," said Congressman Barrow.
The letter to the FTC highlights the need for companies to include consumer privacy protections and online safety measures as they develop new technology online and gain access to more consumer information. Congress man Barrow and other members of the Energy and Commerce committee asked a number of questions to assist in the evaluation of online privacy practices and to protect consumer data.
The letter comes after a number of consumer complaints concerning Google Buzz, including cases where users’ private information was publicly disclosed without their notice or consent.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center ("EPIC") has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission claiming that Google Buzz engaged in unfair and deceptive practices that violated Google’s privacy policy, user expectations of privacy, and federal wiretap laws.