WebProNews

Tag: browsers

  • Internet Explorer Is Pretty Much Dead

    Yes, this is a headline from 2015. You might think that Microsoft’s much-maligned web browser has been dying for years – and you’d be right. But now it’s seemingly official. Microsoft is abandoning the Internet Explorer brand.

    Microsoft has already announced its brand new web browser, codenamed Project Spartan. And we’ve had more than subtle hints that IE was on the way out. But speaking at an event on Monday, Microsoft’s Chris Capossela all but nailed the final nail in the coffin.

    From The Verge:

    …the software maker has now confirmed that it will use a new name for its upcoming browser successor, codenamed Project Spartan. Speaking at Microsoft Convergence yesterday, Microsoft’s marketing chief Chris Capossela revealed that the company is currently working on a new name and brand. “We’re now researching what the new brand, or the new name, for our browser should be in Windows 10,” said Capossela. “We’ll continue to have Internet Explorer, but we’ll also have a new browser called Project Spartan, which is codenamed Project Spartan. We have to name the thing.”

    Apparently, IE will still exist in some small way, in some enterprise versions of Windows 10. But it’s clear that Microsoft is looking for a new name altogether. According to Microsoft, recent research has shown that folks are receptive to the “Microsoft” brand, and that test browser names paired with “Microsoft” have tested very well.

    And most efforts to change public opinion on IE haven’t really gone that well.

    With all this in mind, it’s possible that whatever browser Project Spartan becomes could have the word “Microsoft” in it in some way. It’s now definitive that the browser will not be a new iteration of Internet Explorer.

    Image via IE, Twitter

  • Shareaholic Browser Report: Safari Is On The Rise

    Shareaholic has released its latest Browser Share Report, which indicates that Safari is creeping up in market share.

    The data comes from 250 million web users visiting over 200,000 publishers in Shareaholic’s network. Here’s how it shook out over the past eight months:

    “As someone responsible for a website, you should make it a point to know which the most popular browsers your audience uses are,” notes Shareaholic’s Danny Wong. “Armed with that information, you can go ahead and build digital experiences that work seamlessly across those specified browsers. The following data reveals the world’s most popular browsers, including their respective market shares and how much those shares have grown or declined since our last published study.”

    Chrome hasn’t seen much movement in recent months, though it still dominates the landscape. Safari’s combined share of Safari plus Safari in-app has jumped about five percentage points to approximately 26%. This is attributed to “explosive growth” in Safari in-app usage.

    “Last month, Apple announced its Q2 2014 earnings report which revealed earnings that beat Wall Street analyst expectations due to still strong iPhone sales. It is no wonder why Safari is performing so well,” notes Wong.

    Out of all the browsers analyzed, only Safari’s in-app browser and the stock Android browser saw significant growth. Over half of them were actually in decline. Opera Mini’s share grew, but at the expense of Opera’s desktop browser.

    Check out Shareaholic’s blog for more visualizations.

    Image via Shareaholic

  • Chrome Is Now the Most Popular Browser in the U.S.

    Back in May of 2012, Google’s Chrome browser overtook Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser and became the most popular browser in the world. Now, just a little over a year later, Chrome has finally topped Internet Explorer in the United States.

    As of June, 2013, Chrome is the most used browser in the U.S. The news comes to us from StatCounter, who just published their Internet Wars Report for the past year. It appears that Chrome took most of its users from Internet Explorer, but also sucked a few away from Mozilla’s Firefox.

    “In the United States, IE lost the number one spot in terms of internet usage for the first time in June 2013. Chrome has now taken the number one spot in the US at 34.02% (up from 23.84% 12 months ago). Over the same time frame IE has declined to 32.46% (from 40.89%). Firefox has also lost share in the US, down from 19.83% to 16.86%,” says StatCounter.

    That means that in the last year, Chrome has seen a 42.7% increase from where it was in July of 2012.

    Chrome continues to dominate worldwide, only increasing its lead over Internet Explorer in the past year:

    In other news from StatCounter’s report, Samsung has passed Apple in terms of worldwide mobile internet usage for the first time. Google still dominates the search game, with Bing only making marginal gains in the past year.

  • Internet Explorer 10 Adoption Slow Going, Still Strong Overall

    In a perfect world, everybody who uses Internet Explorer would be on the latest version so all the problems affecting IE8 wouldn’t be happening. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on who you ask, IE10 is only available on Windows 8. That means Microsoft’s latest browser isn’t doing super well in its second month on the market since Windows 8 isn’t doing that well either.

    Despite having sold 60 million Windows 8 licenses since launching at the end of October, the latest browser marketshare numbers from Net Applications shows that Internet Explorer 10 hasn’t even cracked one percent yet. Being exclusive to Windows 8 isn’t doing the browser any favors. There’s a beta for IE10 on Windows 7, but it has received little to no publicity from Microsoft. It probably didn’t add much to these numbers.

    That being said, Internet Explorer is still king. Overall, the browser still has a majority of the browser marketshare at 54.77 percent. When broken down, the constantly hacked Internet Explorer 8 is used the most with 23 percent of the marketshare and the much safer Internet Explorer 9 coming in 21 percent.

    As for the other browsers, Firefox and Chrome are still battling it out for second place. Firefox was in the lead in December with 19.82 percent of the market while Chrome lagged closely behind with 18.04 percent. Safari and Opera came in at 5.24 percent and 1.71 percent respectively.

    In mobile browsers, Apple Safari for iOS is still by and large the dominant force with 60.56 percent of the marketshare. The generic Android browser and Opera Mini are the only other mobile browsers with percentages in the double digits with 22.10 percent and 10.71 percent respectively. Chrome is picking up pace, however, as it has increased from 0 percent to 1.48 percent in only a year. Not bad for a relative newcomer to the mobile browser scene.

  • Internet Explorer Use and Murder Rates Have an Interesting Relationship

    Correlation (n.) – the state or relation of being correlated; specifically : a relation existing between phenomena or things or between mathematical or statistical variables which tend to vary, be associated, or occur together in a way not expected on the basis of chance alone (Merriam-Webster)

    Causation (n.) – a.) the act or process of causing b.) the act or agency which produces an effect (Merriam-Webster)

    You decide.

    (image)

    [Altonncf via ILoveCharts, Tumblr]
    [Lead Image source]

  • ‘Safari’ Wasn’t Named ‘Freedom’ Because That Sounded Like a Feminine Hygiene Product

    Steve Jobs apparently liked the name “Freedom” for a web browser. Makes sense – Apple’s foray into the browser world could have been seen as “freedom” from the oppressive rule of Internet Explorer. But “Freedom” was nixed, in part to concerns that Apple’s yet-to-be-released browser should not be named after a feminne hygiene product. At least that’s how the story goes.

    And the story comes from Don Melton, a retired programmer who is best known for working on the Safari project. He details how Safari got its name in a blog post.

    Here’s how it all went down in the summer of ’02:

    As I remember, Steve just started saying some names out loud — I suppose trying them out to see how they felt in his mouth and to his ears. Which is not as odd as it seemed then — it’s a good technique now that I think about it.

    I don’t recall all the names, but one that stands out is “Freedom.” Steve spent some time trying that one out on all of us. He may have liked it because it invoked positive imagery of people being set free. And, just as possible and positive, it spoke to our own freedom from Microsoft and Internet Explorer, the company and browser we depended on at the time.

    Of course, all I could think about was, “Please don’t let us name the browser after a feminine hygiene product!” But cooler heads and filthier minds prevailed. Apparently, I wasn’t the only one in the room with that concern. So, after some discussion about its actual merits, “Freedom” moved off the candidate list.

    According to Melton, Safari had a couple of internal names that were never really considered – they were just what the folks working on the project called it. “Alexander” was one of them. So was “iBrowse,” which Melton says “became a part of an elaborate joke that later appeared on a team shirt.”

    Anyway, when someone on the team would really annoy me about needing to know the final name, I would often say something like, “I’ve just heard from Scott Forstall and it’s ‘iBrowse’ for sure.” Which really meant, “Don’t bug me with that shit right now.” This is how to endear yourself to your engineers

    Eventually, Jobs chose a name. Here’s Melton describing his reaction when he was told that the browser he’d been working on would ship as “Safari”:

    I honestly didn’t know what to think. My mind was a blank because I just didn’t expect it. The name seemed to come out of nowhere. It sounded more foreign at that moment than its actual origin.

    ‘It doesn’t suck,’ I finally offered.

    Melton promises us more on the Safari story, but he’s saving that for a later date. It’s hard to imagine it not being called Safari, but then again we’d be saying the same thing about Freedom, if that wound up winning out.

    [Don Melton]

  • Google Updates WhatBrowser.org; 43 Languages, Mobile Support

    Google says that no matter which browser you choose, you should at least be informed on whether or not it’s updated and what the other options are. Three years ago, they created a site that answers those questions and more.

    Although WhatBrowser.org is a Google creation, they don’t simply recommend that everyone switches to the newest version of Chrome. For instance, accessing WhatBrowser with Firefox will suggest that you can try Chrome, Opera, or Safari. Not IE, it’s important to note.

    For the truly technologically-challenged among us, Google also provides a short description of what a browser actually is. They also let users know that updating your browser, whichever one it may be, is necessary because it’s faster, safer, and more feature-rich.

    With that in mind, Google has made some changes to the site, which they announced in a Chrome blog post.

    “To reflect the changing browser landscape, we’ve completely revamped whatbrowser.org. The site has been fully rebuilt in HTML5, localized in 43 languages, and now works on mobile, too. The site also highlights why it’s so important to use a modern browser and keep it up to date: doing so saves you time, keeps you safer, and lets you do more online. The browser you choose is up to you; hopefully whatbrowser.org can help,” says Google Product Manager Jeff Chang.

    With the internet reaching more and more people across the world every day, searches like “what’s a browser” and “what browser am I using” will continue to see volume. Google’s WhatBrowser.org ranks near the top for many of these types of searches.

    For fun, if you’re interested, you can take a journey through four years of the browser wars here. The visualization takes you from June 2008 to June 2012 – from a world dominated by Internet Explorer to one where Chrome and Firefox take up plenty of real estate.

  • Both iOS & Android Users Pretty Content with Default Browsers

    Safari is a perfectly acceptable browser to most iOS users, and the default Android browser is perfectly acceptable to most Android users. That’s that takeaway from a new study from ad network Chitika, who analyzed recent mobile browser usage in the U.S. and Canada.

    Chitika looked at hundreds of millions of online impressions from their ad network during a week-long span, and found that outside web browsers and still struggling to gain any ground on default browsers, when it comes to their usage on the two popular mobile operating systems. According to their study, 85.03% of the iOS web browsing share belonged to Safari, while 91.26% of the Android web browsing share belonged to the default Android browser.

    Although users of both OS seem content with sticking to their default browsers, it appears that iOS users are a bit more adventurous. Around 15% of iOS users opt for a non-default browser, with Google Chrome leading the way at 3.07%. The remaining 12% or so is spread out among many other mobile browsers including Firefox, Dolphin, Atomic, Mercury, and more.

    When it comes to Android users, Opera is the #2 browser with 5.83% of the share. Chrome sees 2.34% usage, while Firefox only comes in at 0.56%.

    mobile browser share

    Chrome for iOS, which launched to immediate popularity, continues to receive its first batch of updates and bug fixes. Google also just released an update for Chrome for Android which they say makes the browser more secure.

    Meanwhile, Apple just released iOS 6, which included updates to Safari. These included full-screen mode, iCloud tabs, offline reading lists, and the ability to snap photos or take videos without ever leaving the app.

    [Image courtesy Virtualwayfarer, Flickr]

  • New Kindle Fire Devices Point Users To Trending Web Content

    It looks like Amazon has gone with Microsoft’s Bing as its default search engine on the new Kindle Fire devices’ Silk browser, but the browser also has some other new things in store, compared to the previous version.

    The latest version of Silk has improved page load speeds, improved HTML5 support, and some UI changes. Here’s what it looks like:

    New Silk browser

    It also comes with a new Trending Now feature, which will direct users to popular pages around the web.

    Amazon says it “alerts our customers to pages that have experienced an unusual increase in their level of traffic, usually a good indicator that the page or topic may be particularly noteworthy right now.”

    Here, you can see how it appears from the New Tab page:

    Trending Now

    It also has an additional new content discovery feature called “Selected Sites,” which simply shows other sites Amazon thinks you’ll find interesting.

    [h/t: TechCrunch]

  • Chrome For iPhone, iPad Gets First Update

    Chrome For iPhone, iPad Gets First Update

    Google announced its first update for Chrome on iPhone and iPad in version 21 / 21.0.1180.77.

    The update adds the ability to share directly from Chrome to social networks and email. Other features include: “more actionable” sync sign in error messages, improved detection for the welcome tour, and fixes for pages loading blank in Incognito mode.

    Not a huge update, but an update nonetheless, for the highly anticipated mobile version of the popular browser. Google launched the iOS version of Chrome in June. Here’s a hands-on in case you’ve yet to test the waters.

    In other Google-related browser news, Google has extended its partnership with Opera to remain the default search provider.

    Chrome’s operating system counterpart, Chrome OS, also got some tweaks this week. More on that here.

  • Ex-Mozilla Employee Knows Why Firefox Is Losing To Chrome

    It’s no secret that Firefox is losing the browser wars to Google Chrome. Everybody loves the simplicity and ease of use that Chrome brings with it. I would use Chrome if I didn’t have Waterfox and its wonderful 64-bit version of Firefox. It turns out that even a former Mozilla employee, Jono DiCarlo, recognizes this and lays out what he feels is wrong with Mozilla’s flagship product.

    So what’s the main thing that’s killing Firefox’ popularity? The blog post is titled “Everybody hates Firefox updates” so I think you can guess. DiCarlo says that he had an experience all too common last month with a Canadian woman who said she switched to Chrome because “Firefox kept breaking her extensions and asking her to restart.”

    DiCarlo then goes on to say that everybody who has stopped using Firefox all tell him the exact same thing. The browser either broke their extensions, asked them to restart or both. He points out that the main culprit was the “rapid release process” that has Firefox becoming more like Chrome with an update going out every six weeks. This is where things start to get interesting.

    DiCarlo writes that many people in the Mozilla community came out against the proposed plan. Mozilla is a community driven product that obviously cares about the users and developers above all else, right? Not in this case as he says that the order came from the top-down that Firefox was to enter into the “rapid release process.”

    So here we are on Firefox 14 and it seems that there hasn’t been a lot of work done on the product since it hit Firefox 4. Sure, it has a few fancy new bells and whistles, but it’s essentially the same Firefox I’ve been using all my life. The updates don’t seem to really do anything for me and that’s problem according to DiCarlo. He says that there’s a disconnect between software developers and users with the developers not being able to see updates as anything but good. The users only see it as one more chance for the developers to screw them over.

    We now know that updates suck, and why to an extent. To give us the full story, DiCarlo lists the three things that make updates the worst possible thing:

  • The download/restart takes forever and interrupts your work with a bunch of intrusive dialog boxes.
  • The update may break stuff that you counted on, either by removing features you were using, or by breaking compatibility with other software you use. Maybe the developers never tested your use case, or worse – they tested for it but decdided it didn’t matter because only 2% of users used it. Tough luck to you if you’re one of those 2%.
  • If they changed the interface, your productivity will be lower than usual until you’ve spent a bunch of time learning a new interface. Even if the new interface is “better”, in some theoretical way, to some hypothetical average user, re-training yourself to use it is nothing but a time sink.
  • If anything, DiCarlo wants software developers to take a lesson from Firefox’s mistake – “make sure the benefit to the users outweighs the pain” when it comes to updates. Firefox has been bleeding users everyday for the past few years and the update process has definitely been the main culprit. If Firefox wants to become a bigger player in the browser wars again, they must become user friendly to all instead of just some.

    Interestingly enough, he says that Mozilla also worked its way to ruin by trying to compete with Chrome. He says that the company was constantly comparing Firefox to Chrome and thinking of ways to fight fire with fire instead of fire with water. Even though Opera doesn’t command the audience that Firefox or Chrome does, it’s still immensely popular among its users because they do something different.

    So what advice does DiCarlo have for Mozilla? Make updates suck less and maybe work in a way to make them less obtrusive to users. Chrome delivers updates silently without the user ever knowing they received it, but Firefox still loves to alert you whenever it has downloaded a new update. Making the process as painless as possible is key if my favorite browser wants to ever get anywhere. I really don’t want to see Firefox ending up like Thunderbird, but it could happen if they don’t stop to take the users’ needs into account first.

    UPDATE

    A Mozilla spokesperson reached out to us with a statement in regards to this story:

    Jono’s analysis is interesting, but outdated. Regular Firefox updates are good news for users and for the Web but only when they don’t interrupt what you’re doing. Today’s Firefox updates are applied in the background with no interruptions; they even keep your Firefox Add-ons compatible between releases. The result is that our users always have a fast, beautiful and secure browsing experience. Regular releases also let us get new features to our users faster than ever before, and we can listen to their feedback to improve things, just as we did with updates in 2011.

  • Take A Journey Through Four Years Of The Browser Wars

    Oh how things have changed since 2008, when most of the world was browsing the web via Internet Explorer. It’s no secret that IE has been leaking market share over the past few years, but now we have a pretty visualization that shows exactly how the globe became a little less reliant on Microsoft’s revolutionary web browser.

    Ok, “a little less reliant” is putting it a bit mildly. In July of 2008, IE held over two-thirds of the browser landscape (66.87%). Nearly four years later, in June of 2012, IE owned just 32.49% of the share – a figure that puts it in a dead heat with Google’s Chrome browser.

    All of these figures come from independent web analytics company StatCounter, who today released their “Evolution of the Worldwide Browser Landscape.” It’s a pretty fascinating look at how the world diversified in terms of how they browse the interwebs.

    Check it out below:

    And for the lazy, here are the two graphs from July 2008 and June 2012 back-to-back:

    statcounter web browser usage 2008

    statcounter web browser usage 2012

    Of course, it’s hard to look at this and see anything other than a story of how Internet Explorer lost its mojo – but StatCounter makes a point to say that IE is not giving up browser supremacy without a fight:

    IE is not taking Chrome’s challenge lying down. From May to June, IE increased its usage share by two-tenths of one percentage point, the first monthly increase since October/November 2011. On a weekly basis, while Chrome overtook IE in week 20 (14 – 20 May 2012), by week 24 (11 – 17 June 2012) IE had staged a fight-back and was exactly equal with Chrome in terms of browser usage for that seven-day period.

    Still, we have to declare that the last four years have been won by Chrome, and it’s not even close. While Firefox, Safari, and Opera barely made any gains (and lost a bit of share in Firefox’s case), Chrome was basically the sole browser stealing all of IE’s pie.

  • Chitika Insights: June Market Share Reports [Infographic]

    Yesterday, the Chitika Online Advertising Network released their June Insights Reports and there are a number of findings which may catch your attention.

    While the reports are packed with great information on everything from who the top search engine provider is, to who the top cellphone manufacturers are, one thing stands out in all the reports. Not much has changed.

    Each report features not only the company’s current market share, but also how much it has changed since last month. What you’ll find is that a company’s hold on a market is more than just a fleeting trend. Typically, significant events must occur for any of these players to either gain or lose any great momentum.

    At the top of the list is Chitika’s graphic on the operating system market. No surprises here, Windows comes out on top by a very large margin. Also making the list are Mac and Linux.

    #3

    Next, we have their graphic on the web browser market. There are quite a few competitors here, but again, no real surprises. Internet Explorer is at the top of the list as you would expect.

    #4

    Next, they provide us with a great graphic on the search engine market. Guess who comes out on top here? That’s right, Google all the way.

    #1

    Finally, we have the mobile manufacturing market. It’s pretty self-explanatory, it is an infographic after all.

    #2

    So, there you have it. That’s how things are shaping up when you look at June 2012. I don’t know if we’ll see this changing anytime soon.

  • This Is How Many People Use Chrome [Google I/O]

    Google I/O day 2 has kicked off, and Chrome is one of the big points of focus today. Google just announced that there are now 310 million active Chrome users, making Chrome the most popular browser in the world, globally.

    According to the company, those 310 million users combined are typing 60 billion words, downloading a terabyte of data, and saving 13 years worth of time every day.

    Chrome numbers

    During the keynote, Google hyped up the idea that they’re going to be reaching a lot more people via mobile devices, and yesterday, the company announced that Chrome for Android is out of beta, so that will certainly help.

    Yesterday, Google announced that 400 million Android devices have been activated.

    It just so happens that Google just announced Chrome for the iPhone and iPad. That should make a pretty big difference too. More on that shortly.

  • Google Just Fixed A Bunch Of Bugs In Chrome

    Google released a big stable channel update for Chrome: Chrome 20 (20.0.1132.43). Along with it comes over 20 bug fixes and rewards.

    Many of the bugs, Google says, were detected using AddressSanitizer.

    Google lists them as follows:

    • [118633] Low CVE-2012-2815: Leak of iframe fragment id. Credit to Elie Bursztein of Google.
    • [Windows only] [119150] [119250] High CVE-2012-2816: Prevent sandboxed processes interfering with each other. Credit to Google Chrome Security Team (Justin Schuh).
    • [$1000] [120222] High CVE-2012-2817: Use-after-free in table section handling. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [$1000] [120944] High CVE-2012-2818: Use-after-free in counter layout. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [120977] High CVE-2012-2819: Crash in texture handling. Credit to Ken “gets” Russell of the Chromium development community.
    • [121926] Medium CVE-2012-2820: Out-of-bounds read in SVG filter handling. Credit to Atte Kettunen of OUSPG.
    • [122925] Medium CVE-2012-2821: Autofill display problem. Credit to “simonbrown60”.
    • [various] Medium CVE-2012-2822: Misc. lower severity OOB read issues in PDF. Credit to awesome ASAN and various Googlers (Kostya Serebryany, Evgeniy Stepanov, Mateusz Jurczyk, Gynvael Coldwind).
    • [$1000] [124356] High CVE-2012-2823: Use-after-free in SVG resource handling. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [$1000] [125374] High CVE-2012-2824: Use-after-free in SVG painting. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [128688] Medium CVE-2012-2826: Out-of-bounds read in texture conversion. Credit to Google Chrome Security Team (Inferno).
    • [Mac only] [129826] Low CVE-2012-2827: Use-after-free in Mac UI. Credit to the Chromium development community (Dharani Govindan).
    • [129857] High CVE-2012-2828: Integer overflows in PDF. Credit to Mateusz Jurczyk of Google Security Team and Google Chrome Security Team (Chris Evans).
    • [$1000] [129947] High CVE-2012-2829: Use-after-free in first-letter handling. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [$1000] [129951] High CVE-2012-2830: Wild pointer in array value setting. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [Windows only] [130276] Low CVE-2012-2764: Unqualified load of metro DLL. Credit to Moshe Zioni of Comsec Consulting.
    • [$1000] [130356] High CVE-2012-2831: Use-after-free in SVG reference handling. Credit to miaubiz.
    • [131553] High CVE-2012-2832: Uninitialized pointer in PDF image codec. Credit to Mateusz Jurczyk of Google Security Team.
    • [132156] High CVE-2012-2833: Buffer overflow in PDF JS API. Credit to Mateusz Jurczyk of Google Security Team.
    • [$1000] [132779] High CVE-2012-2834: Integer overflow in Matroska container. Credit to Jüri Aedla.
    • [$500] [127417] Medium CVE-2012-2825: Wild read in XSL handling. Credit to Nicholas Gregoire.
    • [64-bit Linux only] [$3000] [129930] High CVE-2012-2807: Integer overflows in libxml. Credit to Jüri Aedla.

    Google notes that details of some of the bugs may be kept secret until everyone has a chance to update to the latest version.

    We’re sure to get plenty more Chrome news today at Google I/O, as yesterday was primarily about Android. Google did, however, announce that Chrome For Android is now out of beta, and if you have the right device, you can start using it.

    Keep an eye on our Google I/O coverage here.

  • Firefox 13 Home and New Tab Pages Get Redesigns

    If it works for another browser, why not incorporate it into your own, right? Much like Internet Explorer introduced tabbed browsing based off of the success of Firefox, Firefox is taking at least one page from Google Chrome’s playbook; the one regarding what to display when a user clicks a the “new tab” button.

    With that in mind, two of Mozilla’s new features for Firefox 13 are now live with redesigns for the Home Page and for New Tab page. The New Tab page is where the Chrome emulation comes to mind because when users click “new tab,” they are greeted with a page that looks like the following:

    New Tab Page
    Click for larger image

    As you can see, the New Tab page features thumbnails of frequently-visited sites so users can have quicker access to these pages. These thumbnails can be added or removed based on user discretion. Mozilla’s engineers also introduced a memory-saving feature as well:

    Firefox loads tabs on demand when restoring a browsing session to more quickly get you to Web pages. Firefox first loads the tab you are currently viewing, then loads background tabs when you click them. It’s an improvement that makes Firefox start faster and use less memory.

    As for the Home Page update, when a new browser session is opened (or the “home” button is clicked), aside from the whatever web page the user selected as their homepage opening, there’s also a toolbar with the following icons available, “bookmarks, history, settings, add-ons, downloads and sync preferences with one-click shortcuts.”

    An example:

    Firefox Home Page
    Click for larger image
    Over at the Firefox’s YouTube page, there’s a video of these new features in action:


    The final update includes the addition of a new language version of Firefox. According to the Firefox blog, Vannak Eng and his team have introduced the official language of Cambodia, Khmer, into the Firefox lexicon. There are over 85 languages supported by Firefox, and Khmer is just the latest in this ever-growing list.

  • Facebook Boots Chrome, Adds Opera To Supported Browser Page

    This is not as much of a big story as it is fuel to a previous rumor. According to a screencap courtesy FavBrowser, Facebook has ditched Chrome on its recommended browser landing page and opted to suggest users download the latest version of Opera instead.

    You can’t check out that page though, as it no longer exists – you’ll be redirected to the homepage (if you try to access it via Safari on mobile you get an error page). But you can check out this cached version.

    Of course, the significance of this lies in a recent rumor that has Facebook acquiring Opera Software, makers of the Opera browser.

    Now, as far as that rumor goes, it makes sense. Facebook hasn’t been shy about big acquisitions lately, and this would in no way be as earth shattering as a recent sepia-toned purchase. Then again, it’s not like Facebook has a clean plate right now.

    Naturally, an Opera sighting on an official Facebook page will perpetuate the rumors. But it’s not like Facebook has gone nuclear on Chrome. A quick look at Facebook’s help page on supported browsers looks like this:

  • Facebook May Be Looking to Purchase Opera [RUMOR]

    According to a source close with Pocket-lint, Facebook is said to be on the prowl to acquire Opera Software, maker of the Opera web browser.

    There are a few reasons for why this sounds plausible and one or two for why it doesn’t. The most obvious reason that lends any validity to this rumor is the fact that Facebook’s money has been burning a hole in its pocket lately. In a little over a month, Facebook has acquired or absorbed Lightbox, Karma, Bolt Peters, and, perhaps most notable, Instagram. The company just ballooned its coffers after the company’s initial public offering one week ago and, in spite of seemingly everyone except Facebook being very upset with the its shares’ performance so far, Facebook does have some more money to burn.

    More, Facebook has been upfront about the fact that it’s losing revenue traction due to more users accessing the site via mobile app than through the actual webpage. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, heading into the company’s IPO, tried to assuage investors’ concerns about Facebook’s mobile problem by telling them that the mobile frontier is the company’s top priority. If Facebook were to pick up Opera, the acquisition would add a very established mobile browser to the company’s inventory of mobile tools. Also, assuming that time is of the essence in turning Facebook’s mobile platform into a source of revenue growth, purchasing a respected browser like Opera would curtail any time lost spent on building a Facebook browser from scratch.

    Beyond adding a slick, respected browser into its quiver, an acquisition of Opera would give Facebook a really nice browser-based email client, too.

    It’s been all but officially verified by Facebook that it is developing its own search engine, too. Analysts have already speculated that a Facebook search engine would take a huge bite out of Google’s dominance of internet search. Combine a Facebook search engine and a Facebook browser and a Facebook email client and, well, you’ve got yourself some pretty plump Facebook fruit to attract advertisers.

    Plus, if Facebook really wants to take a legitimate run at toppling Google, this would be a pretty firm push in that direction.

    However, Facebook’s passed on big-time purchases before. Microsoft reportedly tried to sell its search engine, Bing, to Facebook last year. Zuckerberg declined the offer, though, saying that Facebook had too much on its plate at the time.

    Facebook’s plate has hardly gotten any less crowded since then; really, the company’s added a second and third helping onto the plate without even clearing off what was there in the first place. Between the IPO mess and the impending class action lawsuits happening as a result of it, an FTC probe into the company’s acquisition of Instagram, and trying to find a way to earn back investors’ trust, Facebook’s got its big, blue hands full.

    In the end, it’s a matter of what Facebook wants to prioritize: cleaning up its act with its nascent yet lackluster existence as a publicly traded company, or trying to keep moving forward with its agenda as a technology company. Then again, the company could take the Double Dare challenge and go after both goals at once. Not impossible, but it could lead to some haphazard decisions.

    For what it’s worth, Thomas Ford, Opera System’s senior communications manager, says Opera Systems is mum on the subject of a Facebook acquisition. He told WebProNews, “We do not respond to market rumors and we have no comment to the rumor addressed in the question.”

  • Yahoo Axis: How It Works With iOS

    Yahoo Axis: How It Works With iOS

    Yahoo revealed its new browser called Axis today. Well, it’s a browser for mobile, at least. On the desktop, it’s more of a browser extension. While it’s noteworthy that Yahoo would even put out a browser, it’s also noteworthy that Yahoo has loaded the browser with a huge emphasis on search, and a different take on search.

    While there have been some issues with the launch for the desktop, Yahoo Axis is live and available for the iPad and iPhone. The company put out a couple of videos demonstrating how it works on both devices:

    The way it works is that if you have a webpage up, you can enter a web address to navigate, like any other browser. You can slide the page down, however, and reveal the search feature, where you can enter keywords and slide through results horizontally.

    It works pretty much the same way on both the iPad and the iPhone, though after trying it on both, I have to say the tablet better lends itself to Axis. You could really say that about any mobile browsing experience though. Browsing is just better on a bigger screen. In fact, Adobe put out a study a couple weeks ago, finding that the share of website visits from tablets grew about 10 times faster than the rate of smartphones within two years of market introduction. About 80% of that traffic came from iPad devices, the company told WebProNews at the time.

    One may wonder why Yahoo hasn’t released Axis as a full desktop browser, but it would be hard to enter the market and immediately compete with Chrome, Firefox and IE. Yahoo seems to be going for an area where Chrome isn’t yet widely available. If it can gain traction with iPhone and iPad users (and potentially Android users), perhaps a full desktop browser might stand a better chance.

    Yahoo itself does have a huge audience. According to its realtime homepage counter, the Yahoo Homepage already has over 52 million views today (at 6:30AM Pacific). I’m guessing a good chunk of that audience has an iPhone and/or an iPad.

    Of course, rumor has it that Chrome will be making its way to iOS.

  • Yahoo Axis Private Certificate Key Leaked at Launch

    Though the security issue has been resolved, Yahoo slightly botched the launch of Axis, its new mobile browser and desktop extension, by leaking its private certificate file in the source code of the Chrome extension. The private certificate was used to sign the extension, and could have been used to create a false extension that would be authenticated as officially from Yahoo.

    Nik Cubrilovic, an entrepreneur, hacker, and blogger at New Web Order, revealed Yahoo’s mistake in a blog post. There, he warned users of the danger the leak posed and demonstrated how the vulnerability could be exploited by creating his own, harmless, forged extension. From the blog post:

    The clearest implication is that with the private certificate file and a fake extension you can create a spoofed package that captures all web traffic, including passwords, session cookies, etc. The easiest way to get this installed onto a victims machine would be to DNS spoof the update URL. The next time the extension attempts to update it will silently install and run the spoofed extension.

    Cubrilovic, after realizing what dangers the leak posed, quickly reported the mistake to Yahoo. According to The Next Web, Yahoo responded by pulling down the Chrome extension and blacklisting the leaked certificate key. The Next Web quoted a Yahoo spokesperson as saying:

    Since discovering this issue we have immediately pulled down the chrome extension. We have blacklisted the exposed cert key with Google which has resolved the vulnerability. An updated chrome extension should be available within the next 30 minutes with this issue completely resolved. We take issues like this very seriously and are dedicated to working around the clock to ensure resolution. We apologize for any inconvenience.

    A new Chrome extension is already available for Axis. The mishap only slightly tarnishes what was otherwise a smooth launch for Yahoo’s new mobile browser. There have been no reports of any malicious software spread using the vulnerability, so score one for Cubrilovic and the rest of the white hat hackers of the world.

    (New Web Order via The Next Web)

  • Are Google Chrome’s Stats Inflated?

    Are Google Chrome’s Stats Inflated?

    Earlier this week, it was announced that Google Chrome had overtaken Internet Explorer as the number one browser in use, and the world rejoiced. However, thanks to the grey area surrounding prerendered web pages, these results may be somewhat dubious.

    As pointed out by PC Mag, via the Windows Internet Explorer blog, the site responsible for the Google Chrome claim was StatCounter, however, when factoring the results, StatCounter included prerendered pages in their results, something Net Applications, another site that tracks these trends, does not.

    With that in mind, Net Applications’ results concerning browser share is a little different. Let’s compare the two. First, StatCounter:

    Source: StatCounter Global Stats – Browser Market Share


    Now for Net Applications:


    As you can see, Net Applications still has Microsoft’s browser as the leader, by a wide margin. Furthermore, StatCounter has decided to stop counting prerendered pages, which is indicated by a mouseover message, which we’ve screencapped:

    StatCounter Disclaimer
    Click for full size image

    For those of you who can’t read small web print and didn’t click the image enlarge link, the text says that due to requests, StatCounter will be adjusting their browser stats to no longer include prerendered pages in the Google Chrome browser. These changes will be reflected from counts beginning on May 1, 2012. Currently, these counts are not viewable as of this moment.

    You can find out more about StatCounter’s position in their FAQ.

    With that in mind, prerendered pages doesn’t exactly explain why StatCounter’s count for IE is much less (32 percent) than Net Applications, which has IE with 54 percent of the browser share. According to the Microsoft blog post, this is due to “geoweighting browser usage baded on real world internet populations.” This topic is the subject of much scrutiny in their post, but suffice to say, after the geoweighting is factored in–something StatCounter does not do–StatCounter’s share for Internet Explorer increases to 44.6 percent, which is much closer to the Net Applications report.

    How about adding a curveball to these proceedings? Another trusted web resource, W3 Schools, also keeps browser stats of their own, which are apparently based on visitors to the W3Schools.com website. Observe the disparity between theirs and other services:

    April 2012 browser statistics:

    Internet Explorer – 18.3 percent
    Firefox – 35.8 percent
    Chrome – 38.3 percent
    Safari – 4.5 percent
    Opera – 2.3 percent

    Based on W3Schools’ numbers, Chrome and Firefox are absolutely smashing IE, which doesn’t fit with either of the prior reports. Apparently, people who visit W3Schools.com are experienced web users who have moved on from Microsoft’s browser.

    In other news, it’s pretty weird seeing a skyscraper ad for Snorg Tees at W3Schools.com.